addressing fidelity of implementation: from a cbam perspective

27
Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective Gene Hall University of Nevada, Las Vegas Email: [email protected] 1 Dr. Gene Hall

Upload: armani

Post on 19-Jan-2016

49 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective. Gene Hall University of Nevada, Las Vegas Email: [email protected]. Key Assumption. Change is a process , not an event There is a personal side An organization does not change until the individuals within it change - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Addressing Fidelity of Implementation:

from a CBAM Perspective

Gene HallUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas

Email: [email protected]

1Dr. Gene Hall

Page 2: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Key Assumption

• Change is a process, not an event

• There is a personal side

• An organization does not change until the individuals within it change

• There is developmental growth

• The innovation may be changed during implementation

2Dr. Gene Hall

Page 3: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Concerns Based Adoption Model

CBAM

User System Culture

Team

3Dr. Gene Hall

Page 4: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

New Practices

Tests

Page 5: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

5Dr. Gene Hall

Page 6: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Alternative Perspectives for Defining the Innovation

• Perceived Attributes (Rogers

• Philosophy

• Goals/Standards/Outcomes

• Implementation Requirements

• Functions

• Behaviors/Actions

6Dr. Gene Hall

Page 7: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

7Dr. Gene Hall

Page 8: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

8Dr. Gene Hall

Page 9: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

As Proposed by the Project Sponsor

As Specified in the Project Request

As Designed by the Senior Analyst

As Proposed by the Programmers

As Installed at Users Site

What the User Wanted 9Dr. Gene Hall

Page 10: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Developer Teacher A Teacher B

Teacher C Teacher D Teacher E 10Dr. Gene Hall

Page 11: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Components of Swing Innovation

Seat(a) (b) (c)

1 plank 3 planks tire

Hanger(a) (b) (c)

2 ropes 3 ropes 1 rope

Support(a) (b) (c)

tree sticks air11Dr. Gene Hall

Page 12: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Innovation Components and variations

Component 1: Grouping

Variation a: Individualized

Variation b: Several small groups

Variation c: One heterogeneous group

Variation d: One homogeneous group

Component 2: Materials Usage

Variation a: Uses a combination of materials

Variation b: Uses program materials only

Variation c: Uses textbook only

12Dr. Gene Hall

Page 13: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

IC Map elements

1) Component Name (dimensions, dim…)

a b c d

Variation Variation Variation Variation

- - - - - - -

example example example example

13Dr. Gene Hall

Page 14: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Key Questions

• 1. What would I see when the innovation is in use?

• 2. What would teachers be doing?

• 3. What would students be doing?

• 4. What I would is see/hear around the classroom?

14Dr. Gene Hall

Page 15: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Innovation Configuration Map for the Mathematics Program

Department of Defense Dependents Schools Arlington, Virginia

a

Teacher poses open-ended problem, highlights mathematical aspects and asks students to determine how to figure them out.

Open-ended questions are used to pose problems, not only at the beginning but also throughout the lesson.

Teacher uses mathematical language to present tasks/investigations.

b

Teacher identifies mathematical aspects of tasks/investigations and explains how to figure them out. Teacher directions are clear. Some mathematical language is used. Some open-ended questions are asked.

c

The teacher presents the activity with little or no explanation. Teacher uses little or no mathematical language. Some teacher directions are clear. Nearly all questions require one-word answers.

d

Teacher structures activity and directs students/ activity. Questions requiring one-word answers are used to check for student understanding. Isolated use of math vocabulary.

e

Teacher presents/explains isolated concept or procedure and assigns individual student work. Questions requiring one-word answers are used to check for student understanding. Isolated use of math vocabulary.

3) Teacher Poses Mathematical Tasks/Investigations {poses, frequency, open0ended questions, language}

15Dr. Gene Hall

Page 16: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Innovation Configuration Map for the Mathematics Program

a

The teacher guides the student sin making connections within the discipline of mathematics and/or to other subject areas.

The teacher elicits connections from the students based on the context of the lesson or investigation.

b

The teacher tends to state the mathematical and/or other subject area connections. Teacher elicitation of connections from the students is minimal

c

The teacher states only the mathematical connections in the lesson or investigation. The teacher makes no attempt to elicit connections from the students.

d

The teacher makes no attempt to communicate the mathematical connections in a lesson or investigation.

4) Teacher Helps Students in Making Connections {making connections among mathematical topics and/or other subject areas

Department of Defense Dependents Schools Arlington, Virginia

16Dr. Gene Hall

Page 17: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Innovation Configuration Map for the Mathematics Program

12) Focusing on Student Learning Student Communication Using Mathematical Language {sharing, language, student interaction, listening}

a

Students routinely share and explain their mathematical thinking in oral or written form. They listen and respond to ideas and other ways of thinking. Mathematical language is used regularly and correctly to describe and clarify. Disagreements are settled by recourse to mathematical reasoning.

b

Teacher has norms and procedures governing materials and student behavior. They are somewhat unclear or inconsistently applied.

c

Teacher has not clearly established norms and behaviors governing materials and student behavior.

d

Students talk to each other not about mathematics but about procedures or mechanics of the task. They only partially listen to what others say.

e

Students rarely share or explain their mathematical thinking or procedures in any form.

Department of Defense Dependents Schools Arlington, Virginia

17Dr. Gene Hall

Page 18: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

New Practices

Tests

Fidelity Low - - - - - - - - - Medium - - - - - - - - - Hi

18Dr. Gene Hall

Page 19: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Innovation ConfigurationMapping is

Reasons WHY…

IMPORTANTClarifying the vision

Turning philosophy into moving pictures

A tool for communicating what “it” is

A tool expanding possibilities

Self-monitoring

Identifying distinguishing features 19Dr. Gene Hall

Page 20: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Truth in packaging

Validating use in the outcome studies

Program Evaluation

Setting parameters for franchising

Target training (development and Delivery)

Testing effects of different configurations

To be able to point out what is NOT “it”

Reasons WHY…Innovation Configuration

Mapping isIMPORTANT

20Dr. Gene Hall

Page 21: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

One workshop IC ratings

TSP Summary of Teacher Configurations

Teacher 1.Units 2. Use of 3.Student 4. Process/ 5. Assessment Taught Materials Grouping Content SS __a__ __b_ __b__ __a__ ___c_

TT __a__ __c__ __c__ _b/a_ __c__

UU __a__ ___a_ ___a_ ___c_ __b__

VV __a__ ___a_ ___a_ __a__ ___a_

WW ___d_ ___c_ __c__ ___d_ __c__

XX __d__ ___b_ ___c_ _____ __c?_

21Dr. Gene Hall

Page 22: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

IC Map data Cluster Analysis IC Components

User# 1 3 6 7Lowest Cluster 1614 D D D F

0770 D G D F3566 D G C E

Low Cluster 7887 D C C E0025 C C C D

Highest Cluster 4335 A B B A3779 A B A A1002 A A A C3708 A A A B

Mixed Cluster 9676 C D B C 0717 B D B C

Majority A Cluster 0003 C B C C8084 A B B C4621 B B B C4126 B B B C6355 A B B B3308 B C B B8696 B B B B6995 B B B B

Majority B Cluster 3735 B B A D6865 B B B D0615 B C C C2799 B C B C2917 A B B D8927 B C B D

3679 B C B D 22Dr. Gene Hall

Page 23: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Concerns Based Adoption Model

CBAM

User System Culture

Team

23Dr. Gene Hall

Page 24: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

How does IC relate to student learning?

• Implementation Bridge

24Dr. Gene Hall

Page 25: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

New Practices

Tests

25Dr. Gene Hall

Page 26: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Dr. Gene Hall 26

Page 27: Addressing Fidelity of Implementation: from a CBAM Perspective

Thank You…

Hall & Hord (2001;2006, 2011). Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles and Potholes (Third Edition). Boston, MA:

Allyn and BaconHord, Stiegelbauer, Hall & George (2006)

Measuring Implementation in Schools: Innovation Configurations. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab.

Email: [email protected]. Gene Hall