advertising mpls labels in igps draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement
DESCRIPTION
Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement. Hannes Gredler . IETF86 March 2013. Motivation and Rationale. R-LFA implementation requires more tight integration of LDP and IGP B i-directional notification path between protocols - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Advertising MPLS labels in IGPsdraft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement
Hannes Gredler<[email protected]>
IETF86March 2013
![Page 2: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivation and Rationale
• R-LFA implementation requires more tight integration of LDP and IGP
• Bi-directional notification path between protocols
• MPLS transport label distribution are Session oriented protocols
• You need to have a session with a neighbor in order to receive/distribute bindings
• Interesting use cases for >1 hop distribution of transport labels
![Page 3: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
USE CASE #1INCREASE (R-)LFA COVERAGE
![Page 4: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Pathologic Topologies
![Page 5: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Add one-hop strict forwarding labels (stack ‘em)
![Page 6: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
USE CASE #2TE BY LABEL-STACKING
![Page 7: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
TE by label stacking per-neighbor labels
![Page 8: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
USE CASE #3ADVERTISING TE LSPS
![Page 9: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Advertise RSVP LSPs as Forwarding AdjacencyIssue: LSP path properties lost
![Page 10: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Advertise existing LSPs & EROs-> Allows path property correlation
![Page 11: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
USE CASE #4EGRESS WAN SDN CONTROL(ER)
![Page 12: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Current TE framework only offers egress Node control.-> No good Egress Link control
![Page 13: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SDN ECMP weight controller and per-neighbor label
![Page 14: Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062813/5681645d550346895dd62fb7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Next Steps
• Yesterday (20130313) submission isis-wg– draft-previdi-filsfils-isis-segment-routing-00– Core is advertising “segments” for source routing– IGP disseminates “segment”– Some similarities (IGP label)– Some discrepancies (Advertising existing labels,
Gloab labels)– Working with authors to assess draft merge