advocacy campaign 6.10.13

8/11/2019 Advocacy Campaign 6.10.13

1/32

TREND OF ENROLLMENT OFREGION V (BICOL) FROM SY

2002-2003 (GRADE I) TO SY 2011-

2012 (YEAR 4): BASIS FORINTERVENTION PROGRAM


2/32

EFA

GOALSCHALLENGE


3/32

The DepED ROV is facingchallenges for the next three

years in time of meeting the

EFA Goals by 2015, thedeadline set by the UNESCO


4/32

10-POINT BASIC

EDUCATION AGENDA


5/32

1) 12-year Basic Education Cycle;

2) Universal Pre-Schooling for All;

3) Madaris Education as a Sub-system within theEducation System;

4) Technical-Vocational Education as an Alternative

Stream in Senior High School;

5) Every Child-A-Reader Program) by Grade I;

6) Science and Math Proficiency;

7) Assistance to Private Schools as Essential

Partners in Basic Education;

8) Medium of Instruction Rationalized;

9) Quality Textbooks; and

10) Covenant with the Local Governments to Build

More Schools.


6/32

PREVALENCE

OFSCHOOL LEAVERS


7/32

The prevalence of school leavers among

Grade I has been noted over the past 10-year

basic education cycle. School leaver is the

most common problem of schools.

Interventions to reduce school leavers are

particularly important because the cohort

survival rate decreased remarkably. Schools

are an essential channel for intervention

because they offer access to large numbers

of pupils. Class advisers are the very persons

who should know the whereabouts of pupils.

In time of meeting the Education for All EFA)

goals and the DepEd ROV targets, there is a

need to conduct an intervention program.


8/32

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS


9/32

The elementary completionrate level is still far from theEFA target of 81.0 percent by2015. Likewise, the drop-outrate is 0.74 percent for theelementary level and 5.32percent for secondary level.Possible reasons were due tochild labor, poverty, health andsanitation, peace and order,

and other problems in a certainarea.


10/32

DepED Region V has

stepped up effort towards

the attainment of the

foregoing, but then it

continues to confront thechallenge of ensuring

greater participation of all

school-aged children,especially in the secondary

level.


11/32

In school year 2011-2012, the net

enrollment rate in elementary

level was 92.30 percent and

49.48 percent in secondary level

which is far below the MDG and

Education for All (EFA) targets.The cohort survival rate reached

76.78 percent for Grade VI in the

elementary and 73.14 percent forYear 4 in the secondary level.


12/32

THE FIVE (5)

BASICQUESTIONS


13/32

1. What is the actual

enrolment trend from SY2002-2003 (Grade I) to SY

2011-2012 (Year 4) along

male enrolment, female

enrolment, and region

total for male and female?


14/32

2. What transition grade or

level requires an

intervention programbased from the enrolment

trend?


15/32

3. What are the different

intervention programs

suggested by thedivision?


16/32

4. What are the reasons

why pupils/students

tend to leave theschool?


17/32

5. What are the status ofsome DepEd Programs

and Projects addressing

the problem on schoolleavers?


18/32

BRIEF REVIEW

OFLITERATURE:


19/32

A low percentage of

pupils reachedgrade six (6) but a

high percentage ofelementary

graduates made it tohigh school.


20/32

Low survival rates are due

to unstable economic

condition of families, poor

health and nutrition

among the learners, childlabor/employment, lack of

schools, and distance ofschools from the

residence of learners.


21/32

Results of the

NationalAchievement Test for

elementary and highschool indicate below

average performancein all subject areas.


22/32

School-age population

continues to increase,

but not all children

are in school, and

many children do not

finish basic education.


23/32

POLICY

THRUST

FY 2012-2015:


24/32

Increase school

participation, completion

and achievement at the

elementary and

secondary levels using alldelivery modalities

available, including the

strengthening of

alternative delivery

modes.


25/32

REGIONAL

STRATEGIES/DIRECT

IONS, 2012-2015


26/32

Putting pupils and

students in school andkeeping them in school

by reducing high leaverrate and by providing

them quality

education.


27/32

SYNTHESIS:


28/32

Based on the regional situational

overview, policy thrust and regionalstrategies/directions, it was found

out that the problem on school

leavers must be addressed in order

to come up with an intense

solutions so that the Medium-Term

Development Goal (MDG) and

Education for All (EFA) goals wouldbe achieved by 2015 as targeted.


29/32

To do it, each school in every

division throughout the region

must be evaluated and validatedin terms of the programs of the

department. Enrollment must be

checked because it is one factorthat affects the basic services of

the government due to budget

requirements. Quality education

can be attained if governmentfunds are utilized properly in the

different programs and projects.


30/32

Region TOTALMALE FEMALE


31/32

Total (MF)MALE FEMALE

School

Year

Actual

Enrollment

School

LeaversPercentage

Actual

Enrollment

School

Leavers

Percentag

e

Actual

Enrollment

School

Leavers

Percentag

e

GRADE I 2002-2003 187 819 101 311 86 508

28 323 15.08 17 030 16.81 11 350 13.12

GRADE II 2003-2004 159 496 84 281 75 158

8 978 5.63 5 157 6.08 3 841 5.11

GRADE III 2004-2005 150 518 79 124 71 317

14 687 9.76 9 017 11.4 5 727 8.03

GRADE IV 2005-2006 135 831 70 107 65 590

2 761 2.03 2 046 2.92 718 1.09

GRADE V 2006-2007 133 070 68 061 64 872

6766 5.08 3 554 5.22 3 075 4.74

GRADE VI 2007-2008 126 304 64 507 61 797

18 058 14.29 8 967 13.90 9 091 14.71

YEAR I 2008-2009 108 246 55 540 52 706

15 945 14.73 9 919 17.86 6 093 11.56

YEAR II 2009-2010 92 301 45 621 46 613

12 675 13.73 8 009 17.56 4 659 9.99

YEAR III 2010-2011 79 626 37 612 41 954

455 0.57 767 2.03 +274 +0.64

YEAR IV 2011-2012 79 171 36 845 42 228


32/32

DIVISION

GRADE I

ENROLLMENT

(SY 2002-2003)

YEAR 4 ENROLLMENT

(SY 2011-2012)SCHOOL LEAVERS %

Albay 26 580 12 771 13 809 51.95

Camarines Norte 16 724 7 764 8 960 53.57

Camarines Sur 52 414 20 495 31 919 60.89

Catanduanes 8 392 4 924 3 468 41.32

Iriga City

2 699

1 429

1 270

47.05

Legazpi City 4 477 1 689 2 788 62.27

Ligao city 3 473 1 611 1 862 53.61

Masbate City 3 567 1 310 2 257 63.27

Masbate Province

34 621

8 750

25 871

74.72

Naga City 5 003 2 763 2 240 44.77

Sorsogon Province 21 181 10 271 10 910 51.50

Sorsogon City 4 705 2 816 1 889 40.14

advocacy campaign 6.10.13

Documents