agri-environmental indicators and gis-based models - instruments to assess sustainability of land...
TRANSCRIPT
Agri-environmental indicators and GIS-based models
- Instruments to assess sustainability of land use systems on regional level
Karl-Otto Wenkel and Alfred SchultzInstitute for Landscape Systems Analysis
Centre for Agricultural Landscape andLand Use Research, Müncheberg
1 Conceptual determination, and thematic and spatial aspects of sustainability
2 Determination of sustainability indicator values using simulation models and spatial data (simulation model - GIS - coupling)
3 Exemplary case studies
Scenario case study (1): Crane habitat quality
Scenario case study (2): N leaching effects of organic farming
4 Conclusions - Research needs
Outline of presentation
Institute for Landscape Systems Analysis
environmental aspects
social aspects
economic aspects
so far no general and uniform understanding of sustainability, but
sustainability should address:
Conceptual determination of sustainability
Conceptual determination of sustainability
[one possible] Solution:
provide information on state and trends of
environment by using indicators
determinate indicator values by monitoring orsimulation
Problem:
conceptual and methodological determination of sustainability
What does it mean?
How can it be operationalized (that is quantitatively determined in order to evaluate and compare)?
agri-environmental indicator:
agri-environmental indicator is a measure of change, or the risk of change, in resources used or affected by land use systems
...
provides information that can be used to achieve economic, environmental and social goals
...
current state or future trends of indicator values can be observed, measured or simulated
Definition of agri-environmental indicator
Indicator classes of sustainable land use and indicator examples
habitat availabilityfor certain plants and animals
habitat availabilityfor certain plants and animals
environmental functions economic functions
social functions
sustainability indicators
agri-environmental indicators
soil fertility water availability biological integrity ...
available agricultural area biological productivity inhabitant's income ...
employment recreation value landscape scenery ...
Biological integrity - What is actually investigated ?
habitat availabilityfor certain plants and animals
habitat availabilityfor certain plants and animals
environmental functions economic functions
social functions
sustainability indicators
agri-environmental indicators
soil fertility water availability
biological integrity ...
available agricultural area biological productivity inhabitant's income ...
employment rate recreation value landscape scenery ...
availability of habitats for certain landscape specific plants and animals
structural properties of landscape (dissection, fragmentation, connectivity, shape, pattern)
diversity of landscape elements
development potential of landscape
Determination of sustainability - Indicators, monitoring and models
sustainability
operationalization by indicators
evaluation by monitoring and/or simulation
methodology for integrated sustainability assessment of land use systems
agri-environmental indicators
indicator monitoring systems
computer based indicator models future
trends
current states
Indicator and model based sustainability assessment
model based predictions ofagri-environmental
indicators
qualitative and quantitativespatial simulation models
hypotheses of policies andmanagement strategies
adaptation
separate and aggregatedevaluation of indicator values
model application
model selection
recommendations,proposals
indicator evaluationparticipative consent bystakeholders, scientists,
politicians
comparison of variants
variants
indicator evaluationparticipative consent bystakeholders, scientists,
politicians
hypotheses of policies andmanagement strategies
adaptation
separate and aggregatedevaluation of indicator values
model application
model selection
recommendations,proposals
qualitative and quantitativespatial simulation models
model based predictions ofagri-environmental
indicators
com parison of variants
variants
Sustainability assesssment - Selection and application of models
different indicators and different spatio-
temporal resolutions for different hierarchic
levels
landscape level
abiotic indicator biotic indicatorhabitat qualitywater quality
Sustainability assesssment - Hierarchic indicator selection (example)
general biotic landscape potential (landscape structure indicators, biotopes, biotope patterns and networks, landscape dissections, ...)
habitat quality of animals with large area demand within and across ecosystems and biotopes
habitat quality of animals with small area demand within specific ecosystems and biotopes
amount and quality of water in rivers and lakes (river catchment discharge)
amount and quality of ground water in subterranean catchments (regional aquifer)
ground water levels in damp ecosystems; ground water recharge and nitrate concentration
local level
ecotope, ecosystem level
recomm endations,proposals
qualitative and quantitativespatial simulation models
indicator evaluation
hypotheses of policies andm anagem ent strategies
adaptation
model application
model selection
participative consent bystakeholders, scientists,
politicians
comparison of variants
m odel based predictions ofagri-environmental
indicators
separate and aggregatedevaluation of indicator values
variants
Sustainability assessment - Decision Support Systems (DSS)
modell guided Decision Support
System
indicator evaluationparticipative consent bystakeholders, scientists,
politicians
biological productivity
hypotheses of policies andmanagement strategies
adaptation
separate and aggregatedevaluation of indicator values
model application
model selection
recomm endations,proposals
qualitative and quantitativespatial simulation m odels
biodiversity - biotic integrityhabitat model
nutrient balance
agroec osys tem model
soil degradation
c rop yield model
eros ion model
groundwater rechargelandsc ape w ater model
variants
comparison of variants
model based predictions ofagri-environm ental
indicators
Sustainability assessment - Indicator related component models
different spatio-temporal resolutions
for different hierarchic levels
Biotic Indicator: Animal habitats affected by agriculture
indicator evaluationparticipative consent bystakeholders, scientists,
politicians
model based predictionof habitat quality
hypotheses of policies andm anagement strategies
adaptation
evaluation of habitat quality,visualization
model application
model selection
managementactivities
neuro-fuzzy basedspatial habitat model
biodiversity - biotic integrity
variants
comparison of variants
spatial driving forces
habitat model
GIS themes
Selected bird species and indicator functions
Agricultural landscapes with multifaceted use, including grassland component; richly structured agricultural area
Open agrarian landscape with intact kettle-holes; richly structured, non-segmented landscape
Fire-bellied Toad (Bombina bombina)
Spacious open agrarian landscape; forests, swamps, mires, as factors of complexlandscapes; low-disturbance landscape
Common Crane (Grus grus)
Barn Owl (Tyto alba)
Institute for Landscape Systems Analysis
Scenario case study (1):
Investigation of potential Common Crane habitats in theUckermark-Barnim region
Scenario case study (1): Common Crane Habitat Quality
Situation
Particularly on account of economic reasons the intensity of production (fertilizers, pesticides) is decreased and a part of agricultural area is set aside.
Problem
What does happen with the quality of Common Crane breeding and resting habitats?
Scenario assumptions
10 % of agricultural area is set aside mineral fertilization is completely stopped
Scenario case study (1): Impact of set-aside
very good
unsuitablebad
acceptable
Potential quality
lakes, ponds
rivers, stream s
current land use situation
set-aside area is increased by 10 % of agricultural area
Voss, Wilkening, Lutze, Wieland & Schultz 2000
Scenario case study (1): Impact of stopping mineral fertilization
very good
unsuitablebad
acceptable
Potential quality
lakes, ponds
rivers, streams
mineral fertilization iscompletely stopped
current land use situation
Voss, Wilkening, Lutze, Wieland & Schultz 2000
Institute for Landscape Systems AnalysisInstitute for Land Use Systems and Landscape Ecology
Scenario case study (2):
Model based investigation ofN leaching effects of organic farming compared to present agricultural practice in Brandenburg
Scenario case study (2): N leaching from different farming systems
Situation
Under current agricultural practice N leaching can be a phenomenon with harmful effects on water quality dependent on site conditions and farming practice.
Problem
What does happen with N indicator variables when switching to organic farming?
Scenario assumptions
The whole agricultural area in Brandenburg is used for organic farming.
Scenario case study (2): Comparison of selected indicators
variable scenario conventionalfarming
present livestock density
scenario organic farming
present livestock density
relative changes(conventional = 100)
nitrate leaching fromagricultural land
(kg N ha-1)
67 32 48
nitrogen load ofpercolation water
(tons year-1)
121.350 57.828 48
groundwater rechargefrom agricultural land
(mm year-1)
127 111 87
nitrate concentration (mg NO3 l-1)
233 127 55
Shannon-Index 2.32 2.22 95.7
N2-fixation (tons year-1)
11.792 58.354 495
CO2-fixation intobiomass (tons year-1)
18.213 11.807 66
Kersebaum, Piorr & Stachow, 1999
Conclusions - Research needs
work to identify and define appropriate sustainability indicators in order to analyze and to evaluate the impacts of different land use systems is to continue
particular problems: indicators for slowly acting landscape processes and for long-term effects of pesticides and animal medicaments
methods to combine and weight different thematic indicators in order to evaluate and compare land use variants integratively
continue development of spatial models for ecological and socio-economic landscape indicators
deepen the knowledge on scale dependence or invariance of landscape processes