ah ccm 02.08.16 - item #6 - 248 castano
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Case # 614FSignificance & Compatibility
Review248 W. Castano
Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director
City Council MeetingAgenda Item #6
February 8, 2016
![Page 2: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CASE NO. 614F Consider a request of Kelly and Audra Kerr,
owners, for the significance andcompatibility review of the proposedreplacement structure located at 248Castano W. under Demolition ReviewOrdinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010) in orderto demolish and/or encapsulate 83% of theexisting roof and encapsulate 52% of thestreet-facing facade to add to the existingmain structure.
![Page 3: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SUMMARY The applicant is seeking to demolish
and/or encapsulate 83% of the existingroof and encapsulate 52% of the street-facing facade to add 1,423 sq. ft. to theexisting main structure.
![Page 4: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
SUMMARY The addition is proposed in order to add
a guest bedroom, master suite, masterbath, den, and utility room.
![Page 5: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
BACKGROUND
The property is zoned SF-A and islocated on the south side of CastanoAve. W., between Nacogdoches Rd.and Alamo Heights Blvd.
![Page 6: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
PROJECT LOCATION
![Page 7: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
POLICY ANALYSISLOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 14,250 14,250Main House Footprint 1,877 3,300Front Porch 177 448Side Porch 1 0 137Side Porch 2 0 0Rear Porch 0 48Garage Footprint 0 0Carport Footprint 500 500Shed(s) Footprint 0 0Breezeways 0 0Covered Patio Structure 0 0Other Accessory Structures 0 719Lot Coverage / Lot Area 2,554/14,250 4,433/14,250Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 18% 31%
![Page 8: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
POLICY ANALYSISFLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 14,250 14,250
Main House 1st Floor 1,877 3,300
Main House 2nd Floor 0 0
Garage 1st Floor 0 0
Garage 2nd Floor 0 0
Other Structures 0 0
FAR / Lot Area 1,877/14,250 3,300/14,250
Total FAR (45% or 50% with bonus) 13% 23%
![Page 9: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
POLICY ANALYSIS
The proposed structure is 22’ 7” in height(max allowed 35’) as measured fromaverage grade.
The proposed structure addition complieswith all regulations concerning setbacks,height, and looming standards.
![Page 10: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
POLICY ANALYSIS
The proposed structure addition will havean exterior comprised of wood siding tomatch the existing material.
The proposed roof will be comprised of acomposition shingle roof.
The existing 1,877 sq. ft. home was builtin 1920 according to the Bexar CountyAppraisal District.
![Page 11: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
EXISTING SITE PLAN
![Page 12: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
![Page 13: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
![Page 14: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
![Page 15: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
![Page 16: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
![Page 17: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
![Page 18: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
![Page 19: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
![Page 20: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
![Page 21: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
![Page 22: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
![Page 23: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
ARB RECOMMENDATION On January 19, 2016 the ARB reviewed the
request, found no significance in theexisting structure, found the proposedaddition to be compatible, and approved therequest.
![Page 24: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty
Responses received:
Support: (6)
Oppose: (0)
![Page 25: AH CCM 02.08.16 - Item #6 - 248 Castano](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051300/58e66ce71a28ab2a298b4957/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
QUESTIONS?