Case # 650FSignificance & Compatibility

Review248 W. Castano

Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director

City Council MeetingAgenda Item # 5

November 14, 2016

CASE NO. 650F Consider a request of Audra Kerr, owner, for

the significance and compatibility review ofthe existing structure located at 248 W.Castano under Demolition ReviewOrdinance No. 1860 in order to demolish100% of the exterior facing walls byencapsulation and replace the existingexterior finish materials with new exteriorfinish materials.

SUMMARY Encapsulate 100% of the existing main

structure with stucco, stone, and replaceexterior finish materials.

4

BACKGROUND

Zoned SF-A Located on the south side of W. Castano

Ave., between Nacogdoches Rd. andAlamo Heights Blvd.

Significance & compatibility review wasdone in January 2016 (2) additions to the existing structure Approved by the ARB & City Council

5

BACKGROUND

Original additions proposed used woodsiding to match the existing structure

Proposed change to the exterior, fromwood to stucco and stone, to match theexisting fireplace

Home additions are currently underconstruction

6

PROJECT LOCATION

7

POLICY ANALYSISLOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED

Lot Area 14,250 14,250Main House Footprint 1,877 3,270Front Porch 177 390Side Porch 1 0 137Side Porch 2 0 0Rear Porch 0 48Garage Footprint 0 0Carport Footprint 500 500Shed(s) Footprint 0 0Breezeways 0 0Covered Patio Structure 0 0Other Accessory Structures 0 719Lot Coverage / Lot Area 2,554/14,250 4,384/14,250Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 18% 30%

8

POLICY ANALYSISFLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED

Lot Area 14,250 14,250Main House 1st Floor 1,877 3,270Main House 2nd Floor 0 0Garage 1st Floor 0 0Garage 2nd Floor 0 0Other Structures 0 0FAR / Lot Area 1,877/14,250 3,270/14,250Total FAR (45% or 50% with bonus) 13% 23%

9

POLICY ANALYSIS

22’ 7” in height (max allowed 35’). Complies with regulations concerning

setbacks, height, and looming standards. Building Materials Stucco & stone Composition shingle roof

10

POLICY ANALYSIS

The existing 1,877 sq. ft. home was builtin 1920.

No evidence that the home was built by a noted architect belongs to a distinct architectural style or has any major historical significance

11

EXISTING SITE PLAN

12

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

13

APPROVED FRONT ELEVATION

14

PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION

15

APPROVED REAR ELEVATION

16

PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION

17

APPROVED LEFT ELEVATION

18

PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION

19

APPROVED RIGHT ELEVATION

20

PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION

21

22

23

24

25

ARB RECOMMENDATION

ARB reviewed project - October18, 2016. Found no significance in the existing structure. Found the modifications to be compatible with the

neighborhood. Approved the project as requested.

26

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners

within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty

Responses received:

Support: (5)

Oppose: (0)

QUESTIONS?