air quality in hong kong 2019 - aqhi
TRANSCRIPT
AIR QUALITY IN HONG KONG 2019
Air Science Group
Environmental Protection Department
The Government of the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region
A Report on the Results from the
Air Quality Monitoring Network
(2019)
Report Number : EPD/TR 1/20
Report Prepared by : Air Quality Information Section
Work Done by : Air Science Group
Checked by : T. Y. T. Lee
Approved by : Dr. Leung Kai-ming, Kenneth
Security Classification : Unrestricted
Summary
This report summarises the 2019 air quality monitoring data collected by the Environmental
Protection Department’s monitoring network comprising 13 general stations and 3 roadside
stations.
The air quality in Hong Kong has been continuously improving. The Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government has implemented a wide range of measures
targeting different local emission sources including motor vehicles, power plants and vessels.
On the regional front, the HKSAR Government has worked closely with the Guangdong
Provincial Government in cutting emissions in the Pearl River Delta Region.
As a result of the numerous emission control measures implemented over the years, the
concentrations of major air pollutants including respirable suspended particulates (RSP), fine
suspended particulates (FSP), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulphur dioxide (SO2) both at the
roadside and in ambient air have declined steadily since 1999, falling by 19% to 81%.
While we have seen evident improvement in the overall air quality of Hong Kong, there remain
challenges ahead. Roadside NO2 levels still exceed the Hong Kong Air Quality Objectives
(AQOs), despite falling 34% from its peak in 2011. Meanwhile, ambient ozone (O3), which is
mainly influenced by the regional photochemical smog problem, is still on a rise. The HKSAR
Government will strengthen its collaboration with Guangdong to further reduce emissions in
the region to alleviate the regional photochemical smog and O3 problems, and continue its
efforts to take forward additional measures to reduce local emissions.
As in previous years, concentrations of carbon monoxide and lead in 2019 remain at levels well
below their respective AQO limits.
---
C O N T E N T SC O N T E N T S
Summary Page
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Air Quality Monitoring Network 1
1.2 Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) 2
1.3 Statistical Analysis of Pollutant Concentrations 2
2. GASEOUS POLLUTANTS 2
2.1 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) 2
2.2 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) 3
2.3 Ozone (O3) 4
2.4 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 5
3. SUSPENDED PARTICULATES 6
3.1 Respirable Suspended Particulates (RSP) 6
3.2 Fine Suspended Particulates (FSP) 8
3.3 Lead (Pb) 8
4. TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS (TAPs) 9
5. VARIATION OF AIR POLLUTION LEVELS OVER TIME 9
5.1 Over a Day 9
5.2 Over a Year 11
5.3 Long Term Trends 12
Appendices
Appendix A Air Quality Objectives and their Compliance Status
Appendix B Air Quality Monitoring Operation
Appendix C Tables of Air Quality Data
List of Tables
Table No. Title Page
1. Classification of Air Quality Monitoring Stations by Land Use 12
Types
List of Figures
Figure No. Title Page
1. Locations of EPD’s Air Quality Monitoring Stations (2019) 1
2a. Sulphur Dioxide Monitoring 2019 (10-minute Average Statistics) 3
2b. Sulphur Dioxide Monitoring 2019 (24-Hour Average Statistics) 3
3a. Nitrogen Dioxide Monitoring 2019 (1-Hour Average Statistics) 4
3b. Nitrogen Dioxide Monitoring 2019 (Annual Average) 4
4a. Ozone Monitoring 2019 (Maximum 8-Hour Average Statistics) 5
5a. Carbon Monoxide Monitoring 2019 (1-Hour Average Statistics) 6
5b. Carbon Monoxide Monitoring 2019 (8-Hour Average Statistics) 6
6a. RSP Monitoring 2019 (24-Hour Average Statistics) 7
6b. RSP Monitoring 2019 (Annual Average) 7
7a. FSP Monitoring 2019 (24-Hour Average Statistics) 8
7b. FSP Monitoring 2019 (Annual Average) 8
8. 2019 Diurnal Variations of NO2 9
9. 2019 Diurnal Variations of RSP 10
10. 2019 Diurnal Variations of FSP 10
11. 2019 Diurnal Variations of O3 11
12. Monthly Variations of NO2, O3, RSP and FSP at Eastern 11
Monitoring Station in 2019
13. SO2 Long Term Trend 13
14. RSP Long Term Trend 14
15. FSP Long Term Trend 15
16. O3 Long Term Trend 16
17. NOx Long Term Trend 16
18. NO2 Long Term Trend 17
19. CO Long Term Trend 18
20. Vehicle Lead Emission and Ambient Lead Concentration 18
• General Air Quality Monitoring Station
General Air Qualily Moni toring Station with monitoring facilities for Toxic Air Pollutants
.t. Roadside Air Qu31ity Monltorin Station
".I ',
0
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
1. Introduction
1.1 Air Quality Monitoring Network
The Environmental Protection Department (EPD) operates a network of air quality
monitoring stations for measuring the concentrations of major air pollutants in Hong
Kong. In 2019, the network was composed of 16 monitoring stations, with 13 general
stations and 3 roadside stations monitoring ambient air quality and roadside air quality
respectively. Details of these monitoring stations are set out in Table B1 of Appendix B.
Additional monitoring facilities specifically designed for collecting Toxic Air Pollutants
(TAPs) samples have been installed at the Central/Western and Tsuen Wan monitoring
stations since 1997.
The monitoring network operated smoothly in 2019. The average monthly data capture
rate for the six air pollutants, namely sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2),
carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), respirable suspended particulates (RSP or PM10) and
fine suspended particulates (FSP or PM2.5) measured at all monitoring stations was
97.5%.
Figure 1: Locations of EPD’s Air Quality Monitoring Stations (2019)
Apart from EPD’s network, the Hongkong Electric Co. Ltd. (HEC) and the CLP Power
Hong Kong Limited (CLP) also operate a number of monitoring stations to assess the
ambient levels of SO2 and NO2 in the vicinity of their power generating stations. The
locations of these monitoring stations and the relevant monitoring results can be found on
the power companies’ web sites below:
1
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
HEC:
https://www.hkelectric.com/en/corporate-social-responsibility/caring-for-our-environme
nt/how-we-care-for-our-environment/air-quality-monitoring-statistics-annual-summary
CLP: https://www.clp.com.hk/en/about-clp/power-generation/cleaner-generation/air-quality-monitori
ng-statistics
1.2 Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA)
To ensure that the air quality data from the monitoring stations are highly accurate and
reliable, a quality system has been established in accordance with the Hong Kong
Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) criteria. Quality control and quality
assurance work was carried out in accordance with EPD's quality manuals and with
reference to international requirements. Performance audits and precision checks were
conducted to check if the accuracy and precision of the network attained our performance
goals. The details are set out at section B3.
1.3 Statistical Analysis of Pollutant Concentrations
In this Report, the concentrations of gaseous air pollutants are adjusted to a reference
temperature of 293K and a reference pressure of 101.325 kPa. The concentrations of
particulate matters are measured at real-time temperature and atmospheric pressure during
monitoring.
2. Gaseous Pollutants
2.1 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
SO2 is formed primarily from the combustion of sulphur-containing fossil fuels. In Hong
Kong, emissions from power stations and marine vessels are the major sources of SO2,
followed by fuel combustion equipment and motor vehicles.
Exposure to high levels of SO2 may cause impairment of respiratory function and
aggravate existing respiratory and cardiac illnesses. Even at lower levels, prolonged
exposure may also increase the risk of developing chronic respiratory diseases.
2
500
400
300
200
DO
/::' a 100 :t. '-' = 0
·~ " .. l;! 8 50
l - ± t t t 1 ± +
10-MinuteA 0
?.4-H<>m AQO
i 4- J - i J I = -
Min 10-min
t..,fa,c ?4hr .6\'PO&f. f Alwu,l A,,.,,,
Min J.41n Av.-..rn~
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Figure 2a: Sulphur Dioxide Monitoring 2019
(10-Minute Average Statistics)
Figure 2b: Sulphur Dioxide Monitoring 2019
(24-Hour Average Statistics)
SO2 was measured at all the 16 monitoring stations in 2019. As in previous years, SO2
concentrations remained low throughout the territory. All monitoring stations complied
with the Hong Kong Air Quality Objectives1 (AQOs) for SO2. The highest 10-minute
average (105 g/m3) and 24-hour average (22 g/m3) were recorded at Central/Western
and Kwai Chung general stations respectively. Both were well below the AQO limits.
2.2 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
The various chemical species of the oxides of nitrogen are collectively termed as nitrogen
oxides (NOx). From an air pollution standpoint, the most important NOx in the
atmosphere are nitric oxide (NO) and NO2. In the context of air pollution, these two gases
are often mentioned as NOx. They are usually produced in combustion processes.
Emissions from power stations, marine vessels and motor vehicles are the major sources
of NOx in Hong Kong. NOx emissions from motor vehicles have greater impact on
roadside air quality.
1 Details of the Hong Kong Air Quality Objectives can be found in Appendix A.
3
500
400
i 300
" 0
j fij 200 g 0 u
. . . ., .
100
. . . . ... . .. . . . 0
l~ O
100
-1 80 ! § 60
! IJ ., -«> g u
-- -.... - .. .... .... -lO
0
., I -Hour AQO . . , .
. . . .. . ... -•
.,_ --.... -
. .
. ... ...
. -
AnnualAQO -- -
.
. .
n
~~ lb At1ersge ± ."""""1Ave:age
Mm ltr Aoer,ge
,.... - -...
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
NO2 is mainly formed from the oxidation of NO emitted from fuel combustion.
Long-term exposure to NO2 can lower a person’s resistance to respiratory infections and
aggravate existing chronic respiratory diseases.
NO2 was measured at all the 16 monitoring stations in 2019. The highest 1-hour average
(366 g/m3) and the highest annual average (81 g/m3) were both recorded at Causeway
Bay roadside station. All general stations complied with the 1-hour AQO (200 g/m3
with allowance of 18 exceedances of AQO limit per year), whereas 7 general stations also
complied with the annual AQO (40 g/m3). Non-compliance with the 1-hour and annual
AQOs for NO2 were recorded at all the 3 roadside stations.
Figure 3a: Nitrogen Dioxide Monitoring 2019
(1-Hour Average Statistics)
Figure 3b: Nitrogen Dioxide Monitoring 2019
(Annual Average)
2.3 Ozone (O3)
O3 is a major constituent of photochemical smog. It is not a pollutant directly emitted
from pollution sources but formed by photochemical reactions between NOx and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) under sunlight. As it takes several hours for these
photochemical reactions to take place, O3 recorded in one place could be attributed to
4
400
350 ., .,
i 300
250
" 0 200 -~ " 1"0 !! 8
100
. . . . ?,.,fax 8br At-eag-e .,
f ., . .V-nual At'e'.age
-Hou AQO ?,,[m Sb At1enge
;o . - -• -· -· -- -· -· . -. - . -0
. .. ., ., . , . , . ..
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
NOx and VOCs emissions from places afar. Hence, O3 is more a regional air pollution
problem.
Being a strong oxidant, O3 can cause irritation to the eyes, nose and throat even at low
concentrations. At elevated levels, it can increase a person’s susceptibility to respiratory infections and aggravate pre-existing respiratory illnesses such as asthma.
O3 was monitored at all the general and roadside stations in 2019. 11 out of the 13 general
stations recorded non-compliance with the 8-hour AQO in 2019 (i.e. the 8-hour AQO
limit of 160 g/m3 was exceeded more than 9 times in the year). The highest 8-hour
average (337 g/m3) was recorded at Tuen Mun general station.
All the 3 roadside stations complied with the 8-hour AQO in the year. At the roadside, the
NO emitted from motor vehicles readily reacts with O3 to form NO2, thereby removing
O3. Because of such O3 scavenging effect, the O3 concentrations at the roadside stations
are significantly lower than those at the general stations.
In Hong Kong, O3 episode days are mostly associated with hot, fine and calm weather
conditions in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) Region, which favour the formation and
accumulation of O3 via photochemical reactions. Such weather conditions mostly occur
in summer and autumn, especially when Hong Kong and the PRD Region are under the
influence of outer subsiding air induced by a tropical cyclone located near Taiwan or the
Philippines.
Figure 4a: Ozone Monitoring 2019
(Maximum 8-Hour Average Statistics)
2.4 Carbon Monoxide (CO)
CO comes mainly from vehicular emissions although a small amount of it may also come
from flue gases of factories and power stations. When CO enters the bloodstream, it can
reduce oxygen delivery to the body’s organs and tissues. Typical symptoms of CO
poisoning include shortness of breath, chest pain, headache, and loss of co-ordination.
The health threat from CO is more severe for those who suffer from heart diseases.
CO was monitored at 9 stations, including 6 general stations and 3 roadside stations in
2019. Similar to previous years, both ambient and roadside CO concentrations remained
very low throughout the year. All the monitoring stations complied with the 1-hour
5
30000
25000
·i 20000
C .5! ;;; 15000 Jo ii u C 0
(.) 10000
5000
0 J. I J. i l
12000
10000
,.-. .e S000
" .~ "
6000
u s (.)
4000
2000
J J J J J
I-Hour AQO
.;r. l l l
8-HourAQO
"T -± l ± J
Max 1hr Average 1 Annua! Average
Min 1hr Average
MaxShr Avuage t Amual Anrage
~fin 8hr A,-erage
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
(30,000 g/m3) and 8-hour (10,000 g/m3) AQOs for CO. The highest 1-hour average
(2,620 g/m3) and 8-hour average (2,309 g/m3) were recorded at Causeway Bay roadside
station, both being well below the respective AQO limits.
Figure 5a: Carbon Monoxide Monitoring 2019
(1-Hour Average Statistics)
Note: CO was monitored at Tsuen Wan, Tseung Kwan O, Yuen Long, Tuen Mun, Tung Chung and Tap Mun general
stations and Causeway Bay, Central and Mong Kok roadside stations.
Figure 5b: Carbon Monoxide Monitoring 2019
(8-Hour Average Statistics)
Note: CO was monitored at Tsuen Wan, Tseung Kwan O, Yuen Long, Tuen Mun, Tung Chung and Tap Mun general
stations and Causeway Bay, Central and Mong Kok roadside stations.
3. Suspended Particulates
3.1 Respirable Suspended Particulates (RSP)
RSP refers to those suspended particulates with nominal aerodynamic diameters of 10
micrometres or less. Combustion sources, in particular marine vessels, diesel vehicles and
power plants, are the major regional and local sources of ambient RSP. Besides, RSP can
also be formed by photochemical reactions of NOx and VOCs as well as atmospheric
oxidation of gaseous pollutants, such as SO2 and NOx. Although to a lesser extent, crustal
derived dust and marine aerosols are also sources of RSP. In Hong Kong, RSP is
contributed mainly by the regional sources.
6
200
150 .
1 :I.
. . ., ., ., . .,
" 0 100 j fij g 0 u
24-Hour AQO
. .,
50 ·• ·• ·• .. . ·• . . . ·• ·• ·• ·• ·• ·• ·• ·•
. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. ..
100
so
i 60 '-' a Annua!AQO
·s 40 C ..
:,i 8
- -- - -- -- - - - - - - --20
0
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
RSP at high levels may cause chronic and acute effects on human health, particularly the
pulmonary function, as RSP can penetrate deep into the lungs and cause respiratory
problems. These effects are uplifted if high RSP levels are associated with higher levels
of other pollutants, such as SO2.
RSP was measured at all 16 monitoring stations in 2019. 10 of these stations were also
equipped with high-volume samplers to collect particulate samples for chemical analysis.
In 2019, all general and roadside stations complied with the 24-hour AQO (100 g/m3
with allowance of 9 exceedances of AQO limit per year) and the annual AQO (50 g/m3)
for RSP. The highest 24-hour average (154 g/m3) was recorded at Central roadside
station, while the highest annual average (43 g/m3) was recorded at Causeway Bay
roadside station.
Figure 6a: RSP Monitoring 2019
(24-Hour Average Statistics)
Figure 6b: RSP Monitoring 2019
(Annual Average)
7
JOO
"" ,,.
i g
100 0 e s j ,.
' . H-HourAQO . .
t- l l l J J ±~" .. ., .. . .. ., "° .. . ' .
Mu l41v A,,nc,t f "-1~, .....
M•l'hr Alwaee
-· ·i 4) ::. Alwua!AQO
• n ·o
i u ,.:> • Q u
-- - -- - - - -- - - -- - -
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
3.2 Fine Suspended Particulates (FSP)
FSP refers to those suspended particulates with nominal aerodynamic diameters of 2.5
micrometres or less, which is the finer component of RSP. FSP has the same emission
sources as RSP, which is also mainly contributed by regional sources. FSP is able to
penetrate to the deepest parts of the lungs because of its small size, hence posing a higher
risk to health. Besides, FSP also causes visibility impairment in air.
In 2019, full compliance with both the 24-hour AQO (75 g/m3 with allowance of 9
exceedances of AQO limit per year) and the annual AQO (35 g/m3) for FSP was
recorded at all general and roadside stations, with the highest 24-hour average (108
g/m3) and annual average (27 g/m3) both recorded at Causeway Bay roadside station.
Figure 7a: FSP Monitoring 2019
(24-Hour Average Statistics)
Figure 7b: FSP Monitoring 2019
(Annual Average)
3.3 Lead (Pb)
Lead (Pb) is the only criteria pollutant included in the AQOs that is also a TAP. In Hong
Kong, the sale and supply of leaded petrol, which is a known major source of lead, was
8
80
M
{' llO
i: 10 ·i ll() ii :!i i:...
-10 -~-~~- --~~--~--~-~-_,.,.... '-1111 ,~--,.... ill!ill ,._ll!ii! 20 l~-!lllj, ___ _ !lli!!! ... --'
24
Bi ur
-- - Central W,ir,i:e {Ut4i o) - ropMiin lR1ri3tl
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
banned from 1 April 1999. Pb was measured at 9 general stations and 1 roadside station in
20192. As in previous years, the Pb concentrations at the roadside and in ambient air
continued to linger at very low levels during 2019. The annual averages, ranging from 10
ng/m3 (at Central/Western, Kwun Tong, Shum Shui Po and Tseung Kwan O) to 13 ng/m3
(at Yuen Long), were well below the respective annual AQO limit of 500 ng/m3.
4. Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPs)
Two groups of TAPs, namely heavy metals and organic substances, have been regularly
monitored at Central/Western and Tsuen Wan stations since mid of 1997. Among the
various TAPs monitored, 8 of them are considered more important in terms of their health
impacts and their annual averages in 2019 are summarised in Table C6. Detailed
description of the TAPs monitoring operation is given in Appendix B4.
5. Variation of Air Pollution Levels over Time
The concentrations of air pollutants in the atmosphere can change over a day, over the
months of a year and in the period of several years.
5.1 Over a Day
The concentrations of most air pollutants generally follow the diurnal pattern of human
activities and traffic. For instance, higher levels of NO2, RSP and FSP are usually
observed in the morning and the evening rush hours when there are more traffic and
human activities. Likewise, the lowest concentrations often occur from midnight to dawn
when the traffic is at its minimum. This type of traffic induced diurnal pattern is much
more distinct for pollutant levels at the roadside.
Figure 8: 2019 Diurnal Variations of NO2
2 Lead was measured at Central/Western, Kwun Tong, Sham Shui Po, Kwai Chung, Tsuen Wan, Tung Chung, Yuen
Long, Tuen Mun and Tseung Kwan O general stations and Mong Kok roadside station.
9
60
1 IO
J ,10
.lO
io
10
so
40
30
20
10
-----2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 I? 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2() 21 22 23 Z,I
Hour
? J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 I? 13 14 15 16 17 18 l9 io l l n lJ ?4
Hour
- - - Cetur•I We1,1mi (lhba.n) ___,_ Tfll Mun (Ruml)
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Figure 9: 2019 Diurnal Variations of RSP
Figure 10: 2019 Diurnal Variations of FSP
The diurnal pattern of O3 is different from those of NO2, RSP and FSP. O3 is formed by
photochemical reactions of its precursor pollutants such as NOx and VOCs under
sunlight. Outside urban centres the ambient O3 levels start to build up before noon and
peak in the afternoon, when precursor pollutants are accumulated and sunlight is strong.
In urban areas and at the roadside, the lowest O3 concentrations are often observed during
rush hours. This is because a large amount of NO from rush-hour traffic acts as an
efficient scavenger of O3. At the roadside, O3 levels are significantly lower than those at
the general stations because of the scavenging effect due to higher concentrations of NO
from vehicular emissions.
10
20
80
60
40
20
0
1,0
100
l 80
·I 60
E 4U ! 20
0 i.n
2 J •I , 6 7 8 '!I 10 11 I? IJ 14 ll 16 17 18 19 20 ?I ?~ ll ?4
- t"IWNV.'IY lll)+ (Jtolldd,1•) _.,_ Tlf)MU11 {Run1I)
l •b "'" Apt M;1y Jun Jul Aus ""' O<I New Doc
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Figure 11: 2019 Diurnal Variations of O3
5.2 Over a Year
The concentrations of NO2, RSP and FSP are in general lower in summer than autumn and
winter for a number of reasons. The higher temperatures in summer months induce larger
mixing heights, which favour the dispersion of pollutants. The rain in summer helps to
wash out pollutants more frequently. The south-westerly monsoon in summer also helps
to replenish the region with cleaner oceanic air.
As regards O3, the highest monthly concentrations usually occur in October with more
favourable weather conditions (such as strong solar radiation, less clouds, low wind
speed, etc.) for O3 formation via photochemical reactions.
Figure 12: Monthly Variations of NO2, O3, RSP and FSP
at Eastern Monitoring Station in 2019
11
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
5.3 Long Term Trends
Air quality is affected by both emissions and meteorology. Over a short period, for
instance a few months to a year, air quality is more subject to variations in weather
conditions, such as stronger solar radiation which promotes photochemical smog
formation or more rainfall that cleans the pollutants from the air, even if the emission
levels remain more or less the same. Air quality is primarily affected by emission sources
in the long run. Therefore, a scientific way to assess air quality changes and the
effectiveness of emission control measures is to examine the long-term trend of annual
average pollutant concentrations over several years.
The long-term trends for the air pollutants presented in this section are based on their
annual average concentrations recorded from the relevant air quality monitoring stations
categorised into 4 groups of land use types, namely Urban, New Town, Rural and
Roadside as defined in Table 1.
Table 1: Classification of Air Quality Monitoring Stations by Land Use Types
Land Use
Type
Land Use Characteristics Air Quality Monitoring
Stations
Urban Densely populated residential
areas mixed with some
commercial and/or industrial areas
Central/Western, Eastern,
Kwun Tong, Sham Shui Po,
Kwai Chung, Tsuen Wan and
Tseung Kwan O
New Town Mainly residential areas Yuen Long, Tuen Mun, Tung
Chung, Tai Po and Sha Tin
Rural Rural areas Tap Mun (background station)
Roadside Urban roadside in mixed
residential/ commercial areas with
heavy traffic and surrounded by
many tall buildings
Causeway Bay, Central and
Mong Kok
5.3.1 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
Since the local implementation of the Air Pollution Control (Fuel Restriction)
Regulations in 1990 for restricting sulphur content of industrial fuels, the implementation
of the Air Pollution Control (Motor Vehicle Fuel) Regulations in 1995 for controlling
motor vehicle fuel quality, the introduction of ultra-low sulphur diesel for vehicle fleet in
July 2000 and the subsequent introduction of Euro V motor diesel in December 2007, SO2
concentrations in Hong Kong have shown a continuous declining trend.
In April 2014 and July 2015, the Air Pollution Control (Marine Light Diesel) Regulation
and the Air Pollution Control (Ocean Going Vessels) (Fuel at Berth) Regulation were
introduced respectively to further reduce SO2 emissions from vessels. Starting from 1
January 2019, the Air Pollution Control (Fuel for Vessels) Regulation was in effect,
which requires all ocean-going vessels to use compliant fuel within Hong Kong waters
irrespective of whether they are sailing or berthing.
On the regional front, the Governments of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong have
been working together to introduce a wide range of control measures, such as retrofitting
12
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
power plants with flue gas desulphurization devices, phasing out highly polluting
industrial plants in the PRD Region, introducing fuels with lower sulphur content, etc., to
reduce SO2 emissions in the Region.
As a result of the implementation of various fuel control measures, both the ambient and
roadside SO2 concentrations in 2019 remained low at 5 g/m3.
Figure 13: SO2 Long Term Trend
5.3.2 Respirable Suspended Particulates (RSP)
The ambient concentrations of RSP in the territory showed a primarily downward trend
between 1995 and 2002, followed by a rebound that peaked in 2004 which was caused by
the increase in regional background RSP levels. The ambient RSP concentrations then
continuously dropped to a level below the annual AQO limit from 2009 onwards,
reflecting a reduction in regional background RSP levels over the last ten years.
As a result of the implementation of various vehicle emission control measures in the last
two decades, the annual average of RSP concentration at the roadside in 2019 was
significantly reduced by 58% when compared with the 19993 level and has remained
below the annual AQO limit since 2015.
3 1999 is selected for comparison as this was the year when the Government started to implement a list of measures
to cut vehicular emissions.
13
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 9S 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 OS 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IS 19
~ URBAN --NEWTOWN --RURAL ~ ROADSIDE
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Figure 14: RSP Long Term Trend
5.3.3 Fine Suspended Particulates (FSP)
We started to monitor FSP at all our monitoring stations in 20114. Same as RSP, the
ambient concentrations of FSP in the territory showed an overall downward trend
between 2011 and 2019, reflecting a continuous reduction in regional background FSP
levels.
The roadside FSP levels also showed a discernible improvement in recent years. In 2019,
the annual average of FSP concentration at the roadside reduced by about 34% when
compared with the 2011 level and has complied with the annual AQO since 2014.
4 FSP were only monitored at four to five air quality monitoring stations between 1999 and 2010.
14
55
50
,::; 45 C
l 40
._g r.=:::::::llt::::::::::::~::,,....,... ____________ _!_An~n~ual~A~Q~O:__-! e 35 I 8 30
25
20
15
10 11 u 13 14 15 16
____ .... -........ __ ·-- ·------..
17 18 19
--URBAN ---- - NEW TOWN --RURAL ---ROADSIDE
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Figure 15: FSP Long Term Trend
5.3.4 Ozone (O3)
O3 is a complex regional air pollution issue. It is formed when precusors such as NOx and
VOCs undergo complicated photochemical reactions under sunlight. O3 can travel long
distances and affect areas downwind. On the other hand, O3 can react with some
pollutants like NO emitted from combustion sources (such as motor vehicles) and be
titrated. Hence the O3 concentrations measured at a particular location would depend on
the regional O3 background level, its local formation as well as titration effect.
As NO emissions from motor vehicles can react with and remove O3 in the air, areas with
heavy traffic normally have lower O3 levels than areas with light traffic. Tap Mun station
started monitoring O3 in 1998. As Tap Mun station is located in a remote rural area with
virtually no local emission, the O3 concentrations recorded could represent the regional
background levels of O3. This station has consistently recorded higher O3 levels than
those recorded in urban areas, but the gap has been narrowing steadily from over 100% in
the early 2000s to about 40% in recent years.
The rural O3 concentrations have shown a moderate upward trend since the early 2000s,
whereas the O3 levels in new towns and urban areas have exhibited relatively more
distinct rising trends. The rising trend of O3 levels in Hong Kong, especially those in new
towns and urban areas, could be attributed to the moderate increase in regional O3
background as well as the reduction in local vehicle emissions, the latter leading to less
NO in the air for titration with O3.
The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government and Guangdong Provincial
Government have been implementing a regional air quality management plan to, among
others, alleviate the photochemical smog and O3 problem by reducing O3 precursors
levels in the PRD Region.
15
0
0
'l"l!_ll" .. """•·---- .....
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Figure 16: O3 Long Term Trend
5.3.5 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
While the background NOx concentrations (i.e. rural area in Tap Mun) remained flat, the
annual averages of ambient NOx in urban areas and new towns exhibited moderate
declining trends between 1999 and 2019. During the same period, the roadside NOx
concentration showed a more distinct descending trend, reflecting the effectiveness of
various vehicle emission control measures implemented over the past decades. The
roadside NOx concentration in 2019 was 60% lower than that in 19995.
Figure 17: NOx Long Term Trend
5 1999 is selected for comparison as this was the year when the Government started to implement a list of measures
to cut vehicular emissions.
16
---------------------------~
120
.. ,,,, ,, .......... ._. ................... , , ............ __ .,..., .. , .. , ... .. ..................... , ....... .. 40 ~ ""'--=--'"'·:..:·:.::· :.:··::·:.:..... _________________ _:·.:::·-~,....::~;;:t
•• Annual AQO
20
90 91 92 93 9.1 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 0,1 05 06 07 OS 09 10 11 Jl l3 14 IS 16 17 18 19
--URBAN •····NEWTOWN --RURAL --ROADSIDE
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
NO2, a major component of NOx, is mainly formed from the oxidation of NO. The
oxidation can be promoted by the presence of a large amount of O3 and VOCs in the
ambient air. The ambient NO2 levels exhibited a slow ascending trend between 1990 and
2004, but the trend levelled off from 2005 to 2012 and has started to decline progressively
since 2013.
Roadside NO2 levels have been more difficult to reduce. However, the increasing trend of
its concentrations once recorded in the past, which could be caused by a combination of
the ageing of motor vehicles, increase in direct NO2 emissions from motor vehicles and
rise in regional background O3 concentration promoting the conversion of NO emitted
from motor vehicles to NO2, was reversed and started to drop from its peak in 2011. The
annual NO2 concentration at the roadside recorded in 2019 had reduced by 19% when
compared with the 1999 level.
To address the problem of the elevated roadside NO2 pollution, the Government has put
forward enhanced measures including supporting the transport trades to test green
vehicles, stepping up the control on emissions from petrol and liquefied petroleum gas
vehicles, providing incentives to accelerate the phasing out of old and polluting diesel
commercial vehicles, as well as tightening the emission standards for newly registered
motor vehicles.
Figure 18: NO2 Long Term Trend
5.3.6 Carbon Monoxide (CO)
The ambient concentration of CO in the territory remained at a very low level while the
CO concentration at the roadside had dropped to a level close to the ambient one in recent
years.
17
} -=--g -~
I u -0
.:l il 1
2000
1500
1000
500
0 1980
1600
1400
1200
400
200
0 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 OS 09 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
- URBAN -- --·NEWTOWN --RURAL --ROADSIDE
Figm·e 20: Vehicle Lead Emi~sion and Ambient Lead Concentration
19S5 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
--Ambiem lead conce.ntratio11 --Vehicle lead emission
250
200 fi t· ;; g " 150 0 'iii .E "' -0
l00 " u >
50
0
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Figure 19: CO Long Term Trend
5.3.7 Lead (Pb)
The Pb concentrations at the roadside and in ambient air have been lingering at very low
levels over the years since the oil companies took voluntary action in reducing the Pb
content of petrol in the eighties. Pb emissions from motor vehicles were further reduced
as a result of the introduction of unleaded petrol in April 1992 and completely eliminated
when the sale and supply of leaded petrol were banned in April 1999.
18
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Appendix A
Air Quality Objectives and their Compliance Status
Hong Kong Air Quality Objectives (AQOs) for 7 major air pollutants were set at levels to
protect public health in 1987. This set of AQOs was reviewed and updated with effect on 1
January 2014. The updated set of AQOs is given in Table A1. The compliance status of the new
AQOs has been used as the indicator of air quality in different districts in Hong Kong.
Table A1: Hong Kong Air Quality Objectives (AQOs)
Pollutant Averaging time Concentration limit [i]
(µg/m3)
Number of
exceedances of limit
allowed
Sulphur dioxide 10-minute 500 3
24-hour 125 3
Respirable suspended
particulates (PM10) [ii]
24-hour 100 9
Annual 50 Not applicable
Fine suspended
particulates
(PM2.5)[iii]
24-hour 75 9
Annual 35 Not applicable
Nitrogen dioxide 1-hour 200 18
Annual 40 Not applicable
Ozone 8-hour 160 9
Carbon monoxide 1-hour 30,000 0
8-hour 10,000 0
Lead Annual 0.5 Not applicable
Notes:
[i] All measurements of the concentration of gaseous air pollutants, i.e. sulphur dioxide, nitrogen
dioxide, ozone and carbon monoxide, are adjusted to a reference temperature of 293 Kelvin and
a reference pressure of 101.325 kPa.
[ii] “Respirable suspended particulates” means suspended particles in air with a nominal
aerodynamic diameter of 10 µm or less.
[iii] “Fine suspended particulates” means suspended particles in air with a nominal aerodynamic
diameter of 2.5 µm or less.
A1
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Compliance with the short-term AQOs
Table A2 shows the compliance status with the short-term AQOs (i.e. 10-min, 1-hour, 8-hour
and 24-hour AQOs) recorded at each monitoring station in 2019. 2 general stations and all 3
roadside stations complied with the 8 hour AQO for O3 and all general stations complied with
the 1-hour AQO for NO2. For other criteria pollutants including RSP, FSP, SO2 and CO, all
general and roadside stations complied with their respective short-term AQOs.
Table A2: Compliance Status of Short-Term Air Quality Objectives in 2019
Station O3 NO2 RSP FSP SO2 CO
8-hr 1-hr 24-hr 24-hr 10-min 24-hr 1-hr 8-hr
General
Station
Central/Western -- --
Eastern -- --
Kwun Tong -- --
Sham Shui Po -- --
Kwai Chung -- --
Tsuen Wan
Tseung Kwan O
Yuen Long
Tuen Mun
Tung Chung
Tai Po -- --
Sha Tin -- --
Tap Mun
Roadside
Station
Causeway Bay
Central
Mong Kok
Notes: “” Complied with the AQO “” Violated the AQO “--” Not measured
A2
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Compliance with the long-term AQOs
Table A3 shows the compliance status of the long-term (annual) AQOs for all monitoring
stations in 2019. All stations complied with the annual AQOs for RSP and FSP whereas 6
general and 3 roadside stations could not comply with the annual AQO for NO2 in 2019. For
lead, all 10 monitoring stations achieved full compliance with the long-term AQO in 2019.
Table A3: Compliance Status of Long-Term (Annual) Air Quality Objectives in 2019
Station Annual
NO2 RSP FSP Lead
General Station Central/Western
Eastern --
Kwun Tong
Sham Shui Po
Kwai Chung
Tsuen Wan
Tseung Kwan O
Yuen Long
Tuen Mun
Tung Chung
Tai Po --
Sha Tin --
Tap Mun --
Roadside Station Causeway Bay --
Central --
Mong Kok
Notes: “” Complied with the AQO “” Violated the AQO “--” Not measured
A3
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Appendix B
Air Quality Monitoring Operation
B.1 Network Operation The Air Science Group of the Environmental Protection Department operates the Air
Quality Monitoring Network which had 16 monitoring stations in 2019. Table B1 shows
the station site information. The measurement of respirable suspended particulates (RSP),
sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3) and carbon monoxide (CO)
concentrations have been accredited by the Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme
(HOKLAS) since August 1995. In addition, the measurement of fine suspended
particulates (FSP) concentration has been accredited by HOKLAS since August 2016.
In order to provide good representation of the air quality in areas of high population
density, the locations of the 16 monitoring stations were carefully chosen by referencing
to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) guidelines with
practical consideration of the unique congested high-rise development of Hong Kong.
The details of the parameters monitored at each monitoring station and a list of equipment
employed for measuring the air pollutants are summarised in Tables B2 and B3
respectively. In general, the concentrations of gaseous pollutants, RSP and FSP are
measured continuously by automatic analysers. Manually operated high volume samplers
using the gravimetric methods are also used regularly to measure RSP concentrations.
The concentrations of lead are measured in the subsequent elemental analysis of the RSP
samples by Government Laboratory using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission
Spectroscopy. In addition, meteorological parameters, including temperature and solar
radiation, wind speed and direction, are also recorded continuously at each station as
appropriate.
Wet and dry deposition samples are collected at 3 stations, namely Central/Western,
Kwun Tong and Yuen Long. The parameters measured for all wet and dry samples + - 2-include: conductivity, pH, Na+, K+, NH4 , NO3 , SO4 , Cl -, F-, Ca2+, Mg2+, formate and
acetate in the filtrate.
B.2 Data Processing and Dissemination At each monitoring station, signals from the continuous analysers and the meteorological
instruments are first stored in a data logger and then sent back to the Data Processing Unit
of the Air Science Group via dedicated broadband data lines for further processing. After
careful checking and validation, the monitoring data are disseminated to the public in the
following manner:
Hourly Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) reporting for individual station
Monthly release of the AQHI summary for all monitoring stations
Monthly updating the data in the Environmental Protection Interactive Centre
(EPIC) for the public to download air quality monitoring data
(https://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/epic/english/epichome.html)
Reporting of monitoring data in the annual reports “Air Quality in Hong Kong” and “Environment Hong Kong”
B1
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Ad hoc provision of air quality data to the public, academics and environmental
consultants upon request for the purposes of research and air quality assessment
The reporting and forecast of AQHI will help the public (particularly susceptible groups
such as the elderly, children and people with heart or respiratory illness) to decide on
taking precautionary measures when necessary. The monitoring results are also regularly
used to assist the formulation of air quality management plans and the evaluation of the
effectiveness of the current air pollution control programmes.
B.3 Quality Control and Assurance A quality policy is adopted to ensure that ambient air quality monitoring results from the
monitoring stations attain a high degree of accuracy and precision. A quality system has
been established in accordance with the HOKLAS criteria.
The accuracy of the monitoring network is assessed by performance audits. Performance
goal of 15% and 20% are adopted for suspended particulates (RSP and FSP) and
gaseous pollutants respectively. In 2019, 359 audit checks were carried out on the stations'
analysers and samplers. Based on the 95% probability limits, the accuracy varied from
-7.7% to 6.7% for gases, and from -9.2% to 6.6% for particulates. All parameters were well
within the specified performance goal as shown in Figure B1.
The precision, a measure of the repeatability, of the measurements is checked in
accordance with EPD's quality manuals. In 2019, 3098 precision checks were carried out
on the analysers and samplers. As shown in Figure B2 and based on the 95% probability
limits, the precision of the network varied between -5.6% and 5.4%, which was again
within the performance goal of 15% for both particulates (RSP and FSP) and gaseous
pollutants.
In addition to the above operation, a system audit to review the quality assurance activities
is carried out on an annual basis on the monitoring network. A report outlining the
deficiencies and corrective actions is compiled at the end of the audit.
B.4 Toxic Air Pollutants Monitoring Operation The Air Science Group installed in July 1997 additional monitoring facilities at Tsuen
Wan and Central/Western stations to measure regularly the levels of Toxic Air Pollutants
(TAPs) in Hong Kong. The TAPs being monitored can be broadly classified as volatile
organic compounds (e.g. benzene, perchloroethylene and 1,3-butadiene), dioxins and
furans (e.g. 2,3,7,8-TCDF and 2,3,7,8-TCDD), carbonyl compounds (e.g. formaldehyde),
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g. benzo(a)pyrene), and hexavalent chromium. Five
distinct methods were used to analyse the collected samples for target TAPs (please refer
to Table B4 for details). All these methods have stringent QA/QC criteria to ensure the
data quality. Sampling media used include stainless steel canisters, Sep-Pak cartridges,
polyurethane foams and bicarbonate impregnated filters. TAP samples are analysed by
the Government Laboratory.
B2
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table B1: Fixed Network Monitoring Stations: Site Information
Monitoring Station Address Area Type
Sampling Height Date Start
Operation Above
P.D.H.K.
Above
Ground
Central/Western
(Sai Ying Pun
Community
Complex)
2 High Street,
Sai Ying Pun
Urban:
Mixed residential/
commercial
82m 16m
(5 floors) Nov 1983[1]
Eastern
(Sai Wan Ho Fire
Station)
20 Wai Hang
Street,
Sai Wan Ho
Urban: Residential 28m 15m
(4 floors) Jan 1999
Kwun Tong
(Yue Wah Mansion)
407-431 Kwun
Tong Road,
Kwun Tong
Urban:
Mixed residential/
commercial/industrial
37m 25m
(7 floors) Jul 1983[2]
Sham Shui Po
(Sham Shui Po
Police Station)
37A Yen Chow
Street,
Sham Shui Po
Urban:
Mixed residential/
commercial
21m 17m
(4 floors) Jul 1984
Kwai Chung
(Kwai Chung Police
Station)
999 Kwai
Chung Road,
Kwai Chung
Urban: Mixed
residential/
commercial/industrial
19m 13m
(2 floors) Jul 1988[3]
Tsuen Wan
(Princess Alexandra
Community Centre)
60 Tai Ho Road,
Tsuen Wan
Urban:
Mixed residential/
commercial/industrial
21m 17m
(4 floors) Aug 1988
Tseung Kwan O
(Tseung Kwan O
Sports Centre)
9 Wan Lung
Road, Tseung
Kwan O, Sai
Kung
Urban: Residential 23m 16m
(2 floors) Mar 2016
Yuen Long
(Yuen Long District
Office Bldg.)
269 Castle Peak
Road,
Yuen Long
New Town:
Residential 31m
25m
(6 floors) Jul 1995
Tuen Mun
(Tuen Mun Public
Library)
1 Tuen Hi Road,
Tuen Mun
New Town:
Residential 31m
27m
(4 floors) Dec 2013
Tung Chung
(Tung Chung Health
Centre)
6 Fu Tung
Street,
Tung Chung
New Town:
Residential 34.5m
27.5m
(4 floors) Apr 1999
Tai Po
(Tai Po Govt.
Offices Bldg.)
1 Ting Kok
Road,
Tai Po
New Town:
Residential 31m
28m
(6 floors) Feb 1990[4]
Sha Tin
(Sha Tin Govt.
Secondary School)
11-17 Man Lai
Road,
Tai Wai, Sha
Tin
New Town:
Residential 31m
25m
(6 floors) Jul 1991
Tap Mun Tap Mun Police
Post Background: Rural 26m
11m
(3 floors) Apr 1998
Causeway Bay
1 Yee Woo
Street,
Causeway Bay
Urban Roadside:
Mixed commercial/
residential area
surrounded by tall
buildings
6.5m[5] /
7m[6]
3m[5] /
3.5m[6] Jan 1998
B3
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Monitoring Station Address Area Type
Sampling Height Date Start
Operation Above
P.D.H.K.
Above
Ground
Central
Junction of Des
Voeux Road
Central and
Chater Road,
Central
Urban Roadside:
Busy commercial/
financial area
surrounded by tall
buildings
8.5m 4.5m Oct 1998
Mong Kok
Junction of
Nathan Road and
Lai Chi Kok
Road,
Mong Kok
Urban Roadside: Mixed
commercial/
residential area
surrounded by tall
buildings
8.5m[5] /
10.9m[6]
3m[5] /
5.4m[6] Apr 1991[7]
Notes: P.D. = Principal Datum
[1] Central/Western station was relocated to the current address in October 2009.
[2] Kwun Tong station was relocated to the current address in April 2012.
[3] Kwai Chung station was relocated to the current address in January 1999.
[4] Tai Po station was relocated to the current address in February 2006.
[5] Sampling height for gaseous pollutants.
[6] Sampling height for suspended particulates.
[7] Mong Kok station was relocated to the current address in January 2001.
B4
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table B2: Summary of the Parameters Monitored in the Network (2019)
Monitoring
Station SO2 NOx NO NO2 CO O3 FSP
RSP MET
[3]Cont
[1]
Hi-Vol [2]
Central/
Western
Eastern
Kwun Tong
Sham Shui
Po
Kwai Chung
Tsuen Wan
Tseung
Kwan O
Yuen Long
Tuen Mun
Tung Chung
Tai Po
Sha Tin
Tap Mun
Causeway
Bay
Central
Mong Kok
Notes:
[1] “Cont” denotes continuous monitoring.
[2] “Hi-Vol” denotes high-volume sampling.
[3] “MET” denotes meteorological parameters such as temperature, wind speed, wind direction, etc.
B5
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table B3: List of Equipment Used in Measuring Air Pollutant Concentration
Pollutants Measurement Principle Commercial Instrument
SO2 UV fluorescence T-API 100E, T-API T100,
T-API T100U, TECO 43A, TECO 43i
NO, NO2, NOx Chemiluminescence T-API 200A, T-API T200, TECO 42i
O3 UV absorption T-API 400, T-API 400A,
T-API T400
SO2, NO2, O3 Differential Optical Absorption
Spectroscopy Opsis AR 500 System
CO Non-dispersive infra-red absorption
with gas filter correlation T-API 300, T-API T300, TECO 48C
RSP (PM10)
a) Gravimetric
b) Oscillating microbalance
c) Beta Attenuation
Tisch PM10+,
R&P TEOM Series 1400a-AB-PM10,
Thermo Scientific TEOM 1405-DF,
Met One BAM 1020,
T-API 602 Beta Plus
FSP (PM2.5) a) Oscillating microbalance
b) Beta Attenuation
R&P TEOM Series 1400a-AB-PM2.5,
Thermo Scientific TEOM 1405-DF,
Met One BAM1020,
T-API 602 Beta Plus
Table B4: Sampling and Analysis Methods Used in Measuring Toxic Air Pollutants
Toxic Air
Pollutants
Sampling
and Analysis
method
Sampling
Instrument
Sampling
Media
Sampling
Schedule
Sampling
Period
Benzene
USEPA
Method
TO-14A
Xontech
910A / RM
910A / ATEC 2200
Canister Twice per
month 24 hours
Perchloro-
ethylene
USEPA
Method
TO-14A
Xontech
910A / RM
910A / ATEC 2200
Canister Twice per
month 24 hours
1,3-Butadiene
USEPA
Method
TO-14A
Xontech
910A / RM
910A / ATEC 2200
Canister Twice per
month 24 hours
Formaldehyde
USEPA
Method
TO-11A
Xontech 925/
RM 925 /
ATEC 2200
DNPH coated
Sep-Pak
cartridge
Once per
month 24 hours
Benzo(a)pyrene
USEPA
Method
TO-13
Tisch
TE-1000
Quartz fibre
filter and
polyurethane
foam with
XAD-2 resin
Once per
month 24 hours
B6
Toxic Air
Pollutants
Sampling
and Analysis
method
Sampling
Instrument
Sampling
Media
Sampling
Schedule
Sampling
Period
Dioxin
USEPA
Method
TO-9A
Tisch
TE-1000
Quartz fibre
filter and
polyurethane
foam
Once per
month 24 hours
Hexavalent
Chromium
CARB SOP
MLD 039 Xontech 924
Bicarbonate
Impregnated
Filter
Once per
month 24 hours
20
I ~
t 10 "' 9.
if 5
l::i (I -• iil - 5 u .. :: -10
-15
-:!:O
-25
.:.0
I -
]Q
t }
, .. ,.;i
D ,Q ..
-!, .. .. l; -10
-IS
-20
_____________________________ Pe.-t'omurn~ ' _ l~PQlk1t.m,iJ.;;\0% ______ _
P'erf-0ffllaru:eo Oo:sl (IU1'/FSP), I'S%
00 OJ c;'onlµµ.laa,
l'iillilhil.t
P rfonnanccHJoaJ., LS'h
.. --..L
S02: N02 co RSP (Hi-Vol} RSP' FSP (Qinllmlllll'3) (Co111JIIIIOU5)
l"1llula11t
,-L"pp,,-Q~~-
OA\!ftV
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Figure B1: Accuracy of Air Quality Monitoring Network, 2019
Figure B2: Precision of Air Quality Monitoring Network, 2019
B7
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Appendix C
Tables of Air Quality Data
Table No. Title
C1. 2019 Exceedance of Short-Term Limits of Air Quality Objectives
C2. 2019 Monthly and Annual Averages of Air Pollutants
Concentrations
C3. 2019 Hourly Statistics of Air Pollutants Concentrations
C4. 2019 Diurnal Variations of Air Pollutants Concentrations
C5. 2019 Total Wet and Dry Deposition
C6. 2019 Ambient Levels of Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPs)
C1
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table C1: 2019 Exceedance of Short-Term Limits of Air Quality Objectives Pollutant: Sulphur Dioxide Pollutant: Carbon Monoxide
Station
No. of
exceedance
of limit vaue
1st
High
2nd
High
3rd
High
4th
High
1st
High
Central/Western 0 105 76 64 62 1970
Eastern 0 59 44 43 41 2170
Kwun Tong 0 50 44 43 41 2150
Sham Shui Po 0 44 44 43 41 2050
Kwai Chung 0 75 57 56 53 Tung Chung 2260
Tsuen Wan 0 48 48 46 45 Tap Mun 1360
Tseung Kwan O 0 30 26 26 25 Causeway Bay 2620
Yuen Long 0 53 50 44 42 Central 2440
Tuen Mun 0 61 57 48 45 Mong Kok 2280
Tung Chung 0 86 72 67 57
Tai Po 0 22 20 20 20
Sha Tin 0 35 34 27 27
Tap Mun 0 20 20 20 19
Causeway Bay 0 67 63 55 51
Central 0 55 49 46 42
Mong Kok 0 45 40 40 39
Pollutant: Sulphur Dioxide Pollutant: Carbon Monoxide
Station
No. of
exceedance
of limit vaue
1st
High
2nd
High
3rd
High
4th
High
1st
High
Central/Western 0 14 13 13 12 1835
Eastern 0 10 8 7 7 1935
Kwun Tong 0 14 13 12 11 1903
Sham Shui Po 0 16 15 15 14 1758
Kwai Chung 0 22 21 21 18 1874
Tsuen Wan 0 18 14 14 13 Tap Mun 1350
Tseung Kwan O 0 14 14 13 12 2309
Yuen Long 0 12 12 12 11 2205
Tuen Mun 0 13 13 13 12 2103
Tung Chung 0 21 19 19 18
Tai Po 0 12 12 10 10
Sha Tin 0 15 14 13 12
Tap Mun 0 13 13 12 12
Causeway Bay 0 17 14 12 11
Central 0 19 18 16 15
Mong Kok 0 19 15 13 10
Pollutant: Nitrogen Dioxide (1-hour limit value = 200 g/m3 ; allowable no. of exceedance of limit value = 18)
Station
No. of
exceedance
of limit vaue
1st
High
2nd
High
3rd
High
4th
High
5th
High
6th
High
7th
High
8th
High
9th
High
10th
High
11th
High
12th
High
13th
High
14th
High
15th
High
16th
High
17th
High
18th
High
19th
High
Central/Western 3 217 203 202 198 195 194 189 186 184 184 179 174 170 168 166 165 164 161 153
Eastern 4 211 207 205 205 193 184 179 169 157 153 152 150 150 146 145 143 139 136 136
Kwun Tong 10 272 216 213 210 206 205 205 204 203 202 192 192 191 190 190 189 187 187 184
Sham Shui Po 6 227 226 217 212 207 207 199 196 195 189 189 188 183 182 182 179 178 178 176
Kwai Chung 12 221 219 215 213 210 210 209 206 205 204 203 202 196 187 187 186 185 185 184
Tsuen Wan 2 207 203 197 193 192 191 190 190 189 185 183 183 182 182 180 179 179 178 177
Tseung Kwan O 3 218 215 213 198 191 189 183 178 175 169 168 167 164 161 160 160 156 156 155
Yuen Long 0 193 186 183 183 182 181 179 179 177 172 169 166 166 165 164 163 163 162 161
Tuen Mun 2 222 201 196 196 188 186 181 180 179 176 175 174 172 170 167 167 167 166 166
Tung Chung 0 178 176 166 165 165 163 163 160 159 159 159 154 154 152 152 150 149 149 149
Tai Po 0 189 182 180 169 164 161 158 156 156 156 154 150 150 148 147 144 142 142 142
Sha Tin 0 185 181 180 170 169 165 164 162 161 161 160 159 159 159 156 154 153 151 150
Tap Mun 0 132 90 77 76 76 69 67 64 64 60 59 58 58 57 57 56 56 56 56
Causeway Bay 121 366 362 356 354 349 348 345 329 329 327 325 323 317 316 313 311 295 291 287
Central 116 323 308 298 295 290 287 285 283 279 276 274 270 265 261 260 260 259 254 252
Mong Kok 88 317 303 294 291 288 281 278 275 273 272 272 266 266 261 258 252 251 250 248
0
0
0
0
0
0
(1-hour limit value = 30,000 µg/m3 ;
allowable no. of exceedance of limit
value = 0)
(10-minute limit value = 500 g/m3 ;
allowable no. of exceedance of limit value
= 3)
Station
Tsuen Wan
Yuen Long
No. of
exceedance
of limit vaue
0
0
0
(24-hour limit value = 125 g/m3 ; allowable no.
of exceedance of limit value = 3)
Station
Tsuen Wan
Tseung Kwan O
No. of
exceedance
of limit vaue
0
0
Yuen Long
Mong Kok
Tseung Kwan O 0
Tuen Mun
Causeway Bay
Central
Tuen Mun
Tung Chung
(8-hour limit value = 10,000 µg/m3 ;
allowable no. of exceedance of limit
value = 0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
C2
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table C1 (Cont.): 2019 Exceedance of Short-Term Limits of Air Quality
Objectives
Station
No. of
exceedance of
limit value
1st High 2nd High 3rd High 4th High 5th High 6th High 7th High 8th High 9th High 10th High
Central/Western 23 306 304 302 278 229 214 206 205 197 191
Eastern 17 304 270 266 265 219 185 184 180 175 169
Kwun Tong 5 240 228 214 190 172 154 150 150 150 150
Sham Shui Po 11 279 274 231 213 206 186 179 171 168 164
Kwai Chung 6 275 269 239 206 169 165 158 146 146 143
Tsuen Wan 14 296 288 246 238 196 192 190 179 174 171
Tseung Kwan O 33 299 297 253 249 214 205 201 192 186 185
Yuen Long 25 310 286 262 248 242 223 222 220 205 200
Tuen Mun 24 337 302 293 277 252 240 222 210 206 203
Tung Chung 28 325 296 260 256 255 238 236 235 234 208
Tai Po 27 297 269 256 251 227 224 218 216 209 197
Sha Tin 33 289 288 247 237 217 210 207 206 201 199
Tap Mun 51 260 255 254 251 251 231 218 216 215 212
Causeway Bay 3 235 213 168 135 118 117 116 111 109 108
Central 4 233 216 195 168 152 148 145 134 133 133
Mong Kok 1 177 157 137 135 134 133 129 127 126 125
Station
No. of
exceedance of
limit value
1st High 2nd High 3rd High 4th High 5th High 6th High 7th High 8th High 9th High 10th High
Central/Western 2 139 118 98 75 74 73 73 73 70 69
Eastern 0 96 85 74 71 69 69 67 67 66 66
Kwun Tong 0 99 92 78 76 75 74 73 73 73 73
Sham Shui Po 1 120 99 85 73 72 70 69 68 66 65
Kwai Chung 0 97 96 71 69 63 62 60 60 60 59
Tsuen Wan 2 123 111 85 78 76 75 71 71 69 65
Tseung Kwan O 0 79 77 66 65 65 63 63 61 60 60
Yuen Long 2 125 114 94 92 89 88 85 85 85 83
Tuen Mun 4 146 139 106 102 99 98 94 94 92 89
Tung Chung 2 123 120 91 89 85 83 80 77 76 75
Tai Po 2 141 126 85 82 74 70 68 66 66 65
Sha Tin 0 97 93 73 69 67 66 64 63 61 60
Tap Mun 0 74 74 73 68 66 66 66 65 64 64
Causeway Bay 3 151 127 114 94 87 83 83 82 82 80
Central 3 154 128 105 86 84 83 78 76 76 74
Mong Kok 3 130 111 103 80 77 76 75 75 74 74
Station
No. of
exceedance of
limit value
1st High 2nd High 3rd High 4th High 5th High 6th High 7th High 8th High 9th High 10th High
Central/Western 2 101 82 75 57 56 56 53 52 51 49
Eastern 0 64 60 48 45 45 45 43 40 40 40
Kwun Tong 0 69 63 55 55 52 48 45 45 45 44
Sham Shui Po 2 80 77 50 44 44 43 39 38 36 36
Kwai Chung 0 57 57 55 46 44 44 44 40 39 39
Tsuen Wan 1 86 74 63 57 56 56 53 50 48 47
Tseung Kwan O 0 59 53 48 48 42 41 40 39 39 38
Yuen Long 1 81 70 59 54 51 47 46 46 46 45
Tuen Mun 2 92 80 69 69 62 60 56 55 55 53
Tung Chung 1 82 74 64 63 59 55 54 53 52 52
Tai Po 1 98 69 66 63 54 52 51 48 47 47
Sha Tin 0 64 57 54 51 49 46 42 42 40 39
Tap Mun 0 53 51 44 39 38 38 37 36 35 35
Causeway Bay 3 108 86 81 64 63 60 59 58 54 54
Central 3 105 82 80 64 61 56 55 54 53 53
Mong Kok 3 94 78 77 59 58 58 56 56 56 55
Notes:
1. All concentration units are in microgram per cubic metre (µg/m3 ).
2. Shaded no. of exceedance of limit value respresents exceedance of the respective air quality objective.
3. Shaded concentration is higher than the limit value of the respective air quality objective.
Pollutant: Respirable Suspended Particulates (PM10) (24-hour limit value = 100 g/m3 ; allowable no. of
exceedance of limit value = 9)
Pollutant: Ozone (Daily maximum 8-hour limit value = 160 g/m3 ; allowable no. of exceedance of limit value = 9)
Pollutant: Fine Suspended Particulates (PM2.5) (24-hour limit value = 75 g/m3 ; allowable no. of exceedance of
limit value = 9)
C3
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table C2: 2019 Monthly and Annual Averages of Air Pollutants Concentrations
Pollutant: Sulphur Dioxide
Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Central/Western 3 2 5 6 4 3 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4
Eastern 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2
Kwun Tong 5 5 3 5 6 7 7 7 6 6 7 8 6 6
Sham Shui Po 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 9 7 6 6
Kwai Chung 8 7 9 12 12 6 6 6 8 8 10 7 8 8
Tsuen Wan 9 7 7 7 8 8 7 8 8 8 3 4 7 7
Tseung Kwan O 6 5 6 3 3 3 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4
Yuen Long 7 3 3 3 3 5 6 7 5 5 7 7 5 5
Tuen Mun 5 2 4 8 8 3 3 4 4 4 6 8 5 5
Tung Chung 13 10 3 3 6 7 9 4 5 4 5 6 6 6
Tai Po 3 2 2 2 3 4 5 4 7 6 6 6 4 4
Sha Tin 5 4 3 2 2 5 5 4 5 6 8 8 5 5
Tap Mun 3 7 5 6 6 5 2 3 5 6 8 8 5 5
Causeway Bay 6 4 4 4 4 6 6 4 5 5 5 8 5 5
Central 10 5 6 5 4 6 5 6 5 4 7 9 6 6
Mong Kok 5 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 6 4 4
Pollutant: Nitrogen Oxides
Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Central/Western 96 55 55 38 44 40 32 41 42 33 42 56 48 48
Kwun Tong 92 54 68 85 64 102 85 68 57 61 58 72 72 72
Sham Shui Po 111 79 70 63 60 58 54 67 60 58 68 84 69 69
Kwai Chung 123 77 87 95 83 110 101 89 80 73 83 97 92 92
Tsuen Wan 118 73 72 64 60 59 53 54 45 45 68 88 67 67
Tseung Kwan O 54 33 39 46 34 54 47 46 36 41 38 43 43 43
Yuen Long 111 61 66 55 46 47 45 55 57 54 68 91 63 63
Tuen Mun 121 72 74 58 62 55 49 57 58 54 72 96 69 69
Tung Chung 107 49 49 32 35 31 25 32 39 38 49 69 46 46
Tai Po 72 43 48 46 37 47 41 42 48 51 48 58 49 49
Sha Tin 62 34 37 39 32 43 37 39 39 41 43 52 42 42
Tap Mun 22 12 13 15 11 11 8 11 7 8 12 16 12 12
Causeway Bay 277 200 209 209 189 253 230 225 227 205 176 245 221 221
Central 239 161 174 149 156 186 171 172 172 148 143 187 172 172
Mong Kok 203 149 154 165 152 172 165 160 145 139 101 145 154 154
Pollutant: Nitrogen Dioxide (Annual limit value = 40 g/m3)
Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Central/Western 60 41 42 32 34 28 24 31 37 30 38 48 37 37
Eastern 53 38 43 36 37 28 26 33 35 39 38 46 38 38
Kwun Tong 54 35 42 49 39 50 47 44 43 48 43 50 45 45
Sham Shui Po 67 49 48 44 42 37 35 43 46 47 54 61 48 48
Kwai Chung 67 46 52 54 47 51 51 51 55 54 61 62 54 54
Tsuen Wan 71 50 51 44 41 35 32 37 34 36 58 64 46 46
Tseung Kwan O 36 21 27 31 22 31 29 31 28 33 29 30 29 29
Yuen Long 67 40 45 40 33 28 28 38 46 46 54 63 44 44
Tuen Mun 68 46 48 40 41 34 32 38 46 44 58 69 47 47
Tung Chung 64 33 32 24 25 20 16 23 32 33 42 51 33 33
Tai Po 50 30 34 34 28 31 28 31 39 42 39 44 36 36
Sha Tin 45 24 29 31 24 30 28 30 33 36 37 40 32 32
Tap Mun 18 10 12 12 9 9 6 9 6 8 11 14 10 10
Causeway Bay 91 68 77 76 71 68 66 77 98 96 87 93 81 81
Central 95 69 78 71 71 65 64 74 96 91 89 94 80 80
Mong Kok 94 70 77 79 77 69 69 77 87 85 71 81 78 78
Pollutant: Carbon Monoxide
Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Tsuen Wan 1030 873 815 688 579 422 396 441 423 513 729 849 645 645
Tseung Kwan O 911 655 749 399 328 314 371 451 462 564 593 651 538 538
Yuen Long 1054 745 576 429 397 481 607 514 529 676 704 836 629 629
Tuen Mun 975 802 807 702 561 600 522 580 679 786 669 646 693 693
Tung Chung 992 491 537 508 540 455 346 419 490 671 657 616 561 561
Tap Mun 680 602 569 414 410 205 285 402 479 630 634 704 501 501
Causeway Bay 1005 810 691 648 709 779 779 774 772 937 750 906 797 797
Central 1092 1042 799 312 849 888 780 934 836 907 816 865 845 845
Mong Kok 1030 899 897 724 905 852 700 739 810 741 730 725 813 813
C4
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table C2 (Cont.): 2019 Monthly and Annual Averages of Air Pollutants
Concentrations
Pollutant: Ozone
Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Central/Western 48 44 57 60 65 43 45 56 93 105 96 62 65
Eastern 53 46 58 60 68 44 43 54 90 101 93 63 65
Kwun Tong 49 48 58 51 64 28 26 42 81 90 89 59 57
Sham Shui Po 40 36 46 46 53 31 29 40 78 84 79 52 51
Kwai Chung 40 39 47 41 49 20 17 32 65 79 75 49 46
Tsuen Wan 39 38 47 44 51 27 28 43 76 83 65 42 49
Tseung Kwan O 69 64 73 64 78 38 38 56 94 104 103 79 72
Yuen Long 37 41 49 53 57 38 39 53 75 81 73 44 53
Tuen Mun 24 33 43 49 48 34 36 49 84 90 78 44 51
Tung Chung 35 42 55 61 63 46 48 60 81 93 83 48 60
Tai Po 51 51 60 58 63 37 39 55 82 89 86 60 61
Sha Tin 56 55 65 60 69 38 38 54 85 93 91 63 64
Tap Mun 71 65 75 73 84 51 50 67 105 119 113 82 80
Causeway Bay 22 22 30 27 33 16 17 21 35 47 49 26 29
Central 25 26 33 31 41 21 20 28 47 62 62 35 36
Mong Kok 24 22 29 25 31 15 13 21 49 55 63 33 32
Pollutant: Respirable Suspended Particulates (PM10) (Annual limit value = 50 g/m3)
Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Central/Western 51 31 29 23 25 13 19 21 31 38 43 39 30
Eastern 45 31 30 26 27 15 22 22 31 39 48 40 31
Kwun Tong 51 32 33 30 30 22 31 29 38 53 57 49 38
Sham Shui Po 48 31 30 26 27 18 24 25 34 40 48 43 33
Kwai Chung 41 26 27 23 23 16 21 21 29 36 42 37 29
Tsuen Wan 47 24 26 23 22 15 22 23 31 38 45 38 30
Tseung Kwan O 40 28 27 25 25 16 22 22 29 38 43 36 29
Yuen Long 52 28 33 25 26 15 23 26 39 53 65 58 37
Tuen Mun 67 35 37 29 29 18 26 29 44 50 64 60 41
Tung Chung 61 27 29 24 21 13 21 23 28 33 41 42 30
Tai Po 51 29 28 25 23 14 20 22 32 39 45 40 31
Sha Tin 44 26 27 24 23 16 22 20 26 32 38 37 28
Tap Mun 38 26 27 25 27 17 24 26 34 44 49 39 31
Causeway Bay 63 47 39 39 37 27 32 31 46 52 53 55 43
Central 58 36 34 30 29 21 26 26 37 44 51 45 37
Mong Kok 53 36 35 30 30 18 24 26 36 44 48 45 35
Pollutant: Fine Suspended Particulates (PM2.5) (Annual limit value = 35 g/m3)
Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Central/Western 36 21 20 17 16 8 12 15 21 26 26 26 20
Eastern 27 18 17 16 15 8 11 14 18 25 24 23 18
Kwun Tong 29 19 19 19 17 12 15 16 20 30 25 24 21
Sham Shui Po 31 18 18 16 15 9 12 14 19 23 24 22 18
Kwai Chung 26 16 18 16 14 10 13 14 19 25 24 22 18
Tsuen Wan 34 18 18 16 14 9 13 15 20 25 27 26 20
Tseung Kwan O 25 16 16 15 13 7 11 13 17 24 23 20 17
Yuen Long 31 13 17 16 15 10 14 16 23 28 28 25 20
Tuen Mun 41 23 24 19 17 10 14 17 26 32 35 34 24
Tung Chung 39 15 19 16 12 8 12 15 21 23 25 26 19
Tai Po 32 19 19 18 15 9 12 15 22 28 28 27 20
Sha Tin 27 15 15 16 13 10 12 12 17 21 21 22 17
Tap Mun 22 15 16 16 15 9 12 15 18 25 24 22 17
Causeway Bay 42 29 25 26 24 17 20 21 28 33 30 34 27
Central 38 22 22 21 19 14 16 18 24 30 30 29 24
Mong Kok 37 24 24 22 20 12 16 18 24 29 28 30 24
Notes: `
1. All concentration units are in microgram per cubic metre ( g/m3 ).
2. Shaded annual average represents exceedance of the respective air quality objective.
C5
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table C3: 2019 Hourly Statistics of Air Pollutants Concentrations Pollutant: Sulphur Dioxide
<----------------------------Percentiles-------------------------->
10 25 50 75 90 95 97.5 99 99.8
Central/Western 8544 97.5 2 2 4 5 7 9 11 14 21 4 43
Eastern 8616 98.4 0 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 14 2 31
Kwun Tong 8672 99.0 3 5 6 7 9 10 11 13 19 6 36
Sham Shui Po 8569 97.8 3 4 5 7 9 12 14 16 20 6 34
Kwai Chung 8656 98.8 5 6 8 10 13 15 18 21 26 8 51
Tsuen Wan 8412 96.0 3 6 7 8 9 11 12 15 22 7 41
Tseung Kwan O 8549 97.6 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 13 16 4 21
Yuen Long 8459 96.6 2 3 5 6 8 10 12 14 18 5 42
Tuen Mun 8632 98.5 2 3 4 7 9 10 12 15 21 5 37
Tung Chung 8388 95.8 2 3 6 9 10 12 15 19 25 6 37
Tai Po 8685 99.1 2 2 4 6 7 9 10 11 15 4 19
Sha Tin 8644 98.7 2 3 5 6 8 10 12 14 17 5 28
Tap Mun 8407 96.0 2 4 5 6 8 10 11 13 16 5 19
Causeway Bay 8528 97.4 2 3 4 7 9 11 13 16 23 5 43
Central 8695 99.3 3 4 5 7 10 12 14 18 25 6 38
Mong Kok 8597 98.1 1 2 3 5 7 8 10 14 23 4 31
Pollutant: Nitrogen Oxides
<----------------------------Percentiles-------------------------->
10 25 50 75 90 95 97.5 99 99.8
Central/Western 8639 98.6 13 20 36 59 92 127 169 234 391 48 535
Kwun Tong 8670 99.0 18 31 54 96 147 185 221 279 421 72 576
Sham Shui Po 8580 97.9 23 36 59 87 119 152 194 266 458 69 615
Kwai Chung 8650 98.7 29 50 80 118 164 199 244 320 436 92 602
Tsuen Wan 8340 95.2 19 35 56 81 116 156 218 307 400 67 509
Tseung Kwan O 8624 98.4 15 20 28 50 90 121 154 197 347 43 599
Yuen Long 8373 95.6 24 36 52 76 111 146 190 254 341 63 507
Tuen Mun 8638 98.6 25 38 57 86 126 159 205 260 324 69 463
Tung Chung 8408 96.0 11 18 32 59 97 127 165 230 313 46 389
Tai Po 8624 98.4 19 28 42 60 85 104 125 162 243 49 412
Sha Tin 8496 97.0 13 19 31 52 83 109 135 171 263 42 395
Tap Mun 8373 95.6 4 7 10 15 22 29 33 41 76 12 154
Causeway Bay 8629 98.5 60 108 190 298 421 503 584 682 877 221 1163
Central 8688 99.2 49 86 148 229 324 385 457 573 732 172 872
Mong Kok 8516 97.2 47 84 145 202 266 311 362 454 697 154 864
Pollutant: Nitrogen Dioxide (1-hour limit value = 200 g/m3; allowable no. of exceedance of limit value = 18.
Annual limit value = 40 µg/m3)
<----------------------------Percentiles-------------------------->
10 25 50 75 90 95 97.5 99 99.8
Central/Western 8639 98.6 12 18 32 50 69 84 101 120 159 37 217 3
Eastern 8619 98.4 13 22 36 50 63 72 83 99 136 38 211 4
Kwun Tong 8670 99.0 15 25 40 60 79 95 116 144 186 45 272 10
Sham Shui Po 8580 97.9 19 28 44 62 81 94 110 131 178 48 227 6
Kwai Chung 8650 98.7 22 35 50 67 90 111 129 150 185 54 221 12
Tsuen Wan 8340 95.2 16 27 42 59 81 101 118 141 178 46 207 2
Tseung Kwan O 8624 98.4 10 15 21 36 60 77 95 120 156 29 218 3
Yuen Long 8373 95.6 18 27 39 55 75 91 109 129 162 44 193 0
Tuen Mun 8638 98.6 18 27 42 61 83 100 115 132 166 47 222 2
Tung Chung 8408 96.0 8 14 26 45 67 82 99 117 149 33 178 0
Tai Po 8624 98.4 15 22 32 46 61 72 85 104 142 36 189 0
Sha Tin 8496 97.0 11 16 27 42 61 77 94 114 151 32 185 0
Tap Mun 8373 95.6 3 6 9 13 19 24 28 35 56 10 132 0
Causeway Bay 8629 98.5 35 52 76 101 128 153 181 213 290 81 366 121
Central 8688 99.2 32 51 74 102 132 154 178 214 253 80 323 116
Mong Kok 8516 97.2 34 52 75 97 123 141 164 202 250 78 317 88
Pollutant: Carbon Monoxide (1-hour limit value = 30,000 g/m3 ; allowable no. of exceedance of limit value = 0)
<----------------------------Percentiles-------------------------->
10 25 50 75 90 95 97.5 99 99.8
Tsuen Wan 8409 96.0 340 430 610 810 982 1120 1230 1380 1720 645 1970 0
Tseung Kwan O 8605 98.2 270 360 490 670 870 980 1099 1270 1544 538 2170 0
Yuen Long 8460 96.6 340 430 590 770 1000 1140 1250 1404 1690 629 2150 0
Tuen Mun 8669 99.0 458 540 660 810 980 1100 1190 1310 1587 693 2050 0
Tung Chung 8411 96.0 310 370 500 680 900 1050 1300 1520 1770 561 2260 0
Tap Mun 8401 95.9 260 350 480 620 770 900 980 1080 1282 501 1360 0
Causeway Bay 8607 98.3 530 630 750 920 1110 1260 1390 1610 2030 797 2620 0
Central 8667 98.9 540 700 840 1000 1170 1290 1420 1570 1900 845 2440 0
Mong Kok 8598 98.2 550 660 800 950 1090 1180 1260 1400 1758 813 2280 0
No. of
exceedance of
limit value
Station
No. of
hourly
data
Data
capture
rate (%)
Arithmetic
mean
Highest 1-
hour
No. of
exceedance of
limit value
Station
No. of
hourly
data
Data
capture
rate (%)
Arithmetic
mean
Highest 1-
hour
Station
No. of
hourly
data
Data
capture
rate (%)
Arithmetic
mean
Highest 1-
hour
Station
No. of
hourly
data
Data
capture
rate (%)
Arithmetic
mean
Highest 1-
hour
C6
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table C3 (Cont.): 2019 Hourly Statistics of Air Pollutants Concentrations
Pollutant: Ozone
<----------------------------Percentiles-------------------------->
10 25 50 75 90 95 97.5 99 99.8
Central/Western 8628 98.5 16 34 56 89 121 140 158 195 307 65 391
Eastern 8623 98.4 22 36 55 89 119 135 149 178 269 65 380
Kwun Tong 8614 98.3 10 23 52 85 112 126 137 154 210 57 317
Sham Shui Po 8485 96.9 10 22 43 73 101 118 133 170 253 51 361
Kwai Chung 8604 98.2 3 13 38 71 100 115 129 147 239 46 348
Tsuen Wan 8403 95.9 7 19 40 71 98 116 134 179 259 49 414
Tseung Kwan O 8603 98.2 17 34 66 104 133 152 166 188 266 72 387
Yuen Long 8430 96.2 10 22 44 74 105 129 157 209 281 53 415
Tuen Mun 8557 97.7 7 18 40 71 107 130 162 217 315 51 422
Tung Chung 8398 95.9 10 29 52 82 113 135 165 218 310 60 412
Tai Po 8686 99.2 10 27 53 88 118 140 164 201 274 61 374
Sha Tin 8569 97.8 11 27 55 94 125 146 168 199 263 64 349
Tap Mun 8398 95.9 26 44 73 109 141 161 176 203 264 80 319
Causeway Bay 8613 98.3 5 10 21 41 65 81 95 108 148 29 288
Central 8709 99.4 5 12 27 53 80 95 110 129 194 36 293
Mong Kok 8515 97.2 3 9 23 47 75 89 104 119 158 32 237
Pollutant: Respirable Suspended Particulates (PM10)
<----------------------------Percentiles-------------------------->
10 25 50 75 90 95 97.5 99 99.8
Central/Western 8592 98.1 10 15 26 40 54 66 77 103 153 30 200
Eastern 8491 96.9 12 17 27 42 56 66 73 86 115 31 179
Kwun Tong 8333 95.1 13 22 35 51 65 74 81 90 139 38 171
Sham Shui Po 8452 96.5 14 19 29 42 57 67 75 92 139 33 187
Kwai Chung 8528 97.4 11 17 25 37 49 60 69 86 115 29 136
Tsuen Wan 8565 97.8 11 16 25 38 55 66 79 106 144 30 166
Tseung Kwan O 8579 97.9 12 17 26 38 52 59 68 77 112 29 185
Yuen Long 8558 97.7 12 19 31 50 71 85 97 112 142 37 186
Tuen Mun 8572 97.9 15 22 34 54 75 90 105 128 164 41 204
Tung Chung 8588 98.0 10 16 25 38 57 71 88 119 147 30 203
Tai Po 8650 98.7 10 16 26 40 55 66 78 94 172 31 241
Sha Tin 8123 92.7 11 17 25 36 50 59 68 79 137 28 173
Tap Mun 8503 97.1 13 19 27 41 55 62 69 77 89 31 126
Causeway Bay 8419 96.1 19 28 40 55 70 81 91 110 173 43 233
Central 8478 96.8 15 22 32 46 62 74 85 112 168 37 235
Mong Kok 8685 99.1 14 20 31 45 62 72 84 108 155 35 202
Pollutant: Fine Suspended Particulates (PM2.5)
<----------------------------Percentiles-------------------------->
10 25 50 75 90 95 97.5 99 99.8
Central/Western 8592 98.1 7 10 18 26 35 45 54 75 110 20 145
Eastern 8510 97.1 5 10 16 24 32 39 45 55 76 18 117
Kwun Tong 8553 97.6 7 12 19 27 35 42 49 61 80 21 102
Sham Shui Po 8306 94.8 7 10 16 23 31 37 44 57 96 18 129
Kwai Chung 8518 97.2 7 11 16 23 31 37 44 57 71 18 90
Tsuen Wan 8565 97.8 6 10 17 25 36 45 55 72 103 20 126
Tseung Kwan O 8574 97.9 5 9 15 22 30 38 44 52 72 17 118
Yuen Long 8577 97.9 7 11 17 25 36 43 52 63 88 20 115
Tuen Mun 8573 97.9 9 13 22 32 44 52 64 76 101 24 124
Tung Chung 8588 98.0 6 9 15 25 36 47 60 78 101 19 124
Tai Po 8650 98.7 7 11 18 26 37 44 54 68 102 20 164
Sha Tin 8156 93.1 5 9 15 22 30 36 45 56 87 17 129
Tap Mun 8557 97.7 7 10 16 23 30 36 41 47 57 17 68
Causeway Bay 8419 96.1 12 18 25 34 44 53 61 76 120 27 167
Central 8478 96.8 9 14 21 30 39 49 59 79 115 24 152
Mong Kok 8685 99.1 10 14 21 30 40 48 58 78 109 24 143
Notes:
1. All concentration units are in microgram per cubic metre ( g/m3 ).
2. Shaded arithmetic mean represents exceedance of the respective air quality objective.
3. Shaded no. of exceedance of limit value represents exceedance of the respective air quality objective.
Station
No. of
hourly
data
Data
capture
rate (%)
Arithmetic
mean
Highest 1-
hour
Station
No. of
hourly
data
Data
capture
rate (%)
Arithmetic
mean
Highest 1-
hour
Station
No. of
hourly
data
Data
capture
rate (%)
Arithmetic
mean
Highest 1-
hour
C7
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table C4: 2019 Diurnal Variations of Air Pollutants Concentrations
Pollutant: Sulphur DioxideStation Hr01 Hr02 Hr03 Hr04 Hr05 Hr06 Hr07 Hr08 Hr09 Hr10 Hr11 Hr12 Hr13 Hr14 Hr15 Hr16 Hr17 Hr18 Hr19 Hr20 Hr21 Hr22 Hr23 Hr24
Central/Western 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Eastern 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Kwun Tong 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 6 6 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Sham Shui Po 5 5 5 7 6 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5
Kwai Chung 8 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 8
Tsuen Wan 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Tseung Kwan O 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4
Yuen Long 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5
Tuen Mun 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4
Tung Chung 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Tai Po 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Sha Tin 5 4 4 6 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Tap Mun 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Causeway Bay 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 4
Central 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 6 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 6 7 7 7 6 6 5 5
Mong Kok 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3
Pollutant: Nitrogen Oxides Station Hr01 Hr02 Hr03 Hr04 Hr05 Hr06 Hr07 Hr08 Hr09 Hr10 Hr11 Hr12 Hr13 Hr14 Hr15 Hr16 Hr17 Hr18 Hr19 Hr20 Hr21 Hr22 Hr23 Hr24
Central/Western 38 33 28 25 24 26 34 51 64 68 63 59 54 51 51 56 54 56 57 58 56 52 48 43
Kwun Tong 50 35 30 26 26 37 67 94 101 99 90 83 78 78 84 89 93 99 103 94 79 69 67 61
Sham Shui Po 53 42 36 34 35 39 56 77 89 89 79 77 75 78 80 85 90 93 94 86 76 70 66 61
Kwai Chung 71 53 47 42 41 49 77 113 130 123 107 100 96 99 106 110 117 122 127 113 99 89 85 80
Tsuen Wan 51 36 28 26 27 31 53 73 86 84 80 77 73 76 78 81 84 88 92 88 78 69 67 64
Tseung Kwan O 49 41 32 30 35 43 67 67 45 36 33 33 32 33 33 35 39 45 49 50 52 47 50 49
Yuen Long 56 49 41 37 38 45 73 96 81 65 58 53 50 53 55 61 68 73 79 83 79 75 73 67
Tuen Mun 61 52 46 41 40 51 68 90 91 82 75 70 64 64 66 68 73 83 89 87 83 77 72 65
Tung Chung 42 34 30 27 27 32 41 53 56 57 57 55 51 52 53 52 52 51 54 50 48 47 46 43
Tai Po 42 35 30 27 29 33 54 83 76 58 49 45 41 42 44 46 51 56 59 59 56 52 50 47
Sha Tin 42 36 30 27 26 29 46 62 60 47 38 33 30 29 31 36 41 45 50 54 54 52 51 48
Tap Mun 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 13 15 16 15 13 12 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 12 12 12 11
Causeway Bay 151 103 89 80 79 82 144 243 288 287 276 291 294 305 293 279 281 286 290 276 232 234 233 190
Central 114 93 81 73 70 74 111 174 258 249 241 230 205 187 205 212 209 233 262 220 177 159 147 139
Mong Kok 109 73 62 59 59 63 105 148 184 187 189 190 190 201 201 209 218 220 221 193 163 162 159 143
Pollutant: Nitrogen Dioxide Station Hr01 Hr02 Hr03 Hr04 Hr05 Hr06 Hr07 Hr08 Hr09 Hr10 Hr11 Hr12 Hr13 Hr14 Hr15 Hr16 Hr17 Hr18 Hr19 Hr20 Hr21 Hr22 Hr23 Hr24
Central/Western 31 27 23 21 20 21 27 39 44 45 43 41 39 38 40 44 45 47 49 49 46 42 39 35
Eastern 31 25 21 19 19 21 32 44 48 46 43 41 38 40 43 46 50 51 49 46 43 40 37 35
Kwun Tong 36 26 22 20 20 25 40 52 53 52 50 48 47 49 53 57 60 63 66 61 53 47 46 42
Sham Shui Po 39 31 27 25 25 28 39 49 53 52 49 49 49 52 55 59 64 67 69 64 57 51 48 45
Kwai Chung 44 34 30 27 27 31 43 55 61 61 57 57 58 61 67 70 75 77 77 70 61 56 53 50
Tsuen Wan 37 26 21 19 20 23 38 47 50 49 48 48 49 52 55 58 62 66 68 65 57 51 49 46
Tseung Kwan O 34 29 23 22 24 27 36 36 28 23 22 21 21 23 23 25 28 34 37 38 38 36 36 36
Yuen Long 41 37 32 29 29 33 42 49 46 41 38 37 36 39 41 46 52 57 61 61 57 53 51 48
Tuen Mun 42 37 33 30 30 35 43 50 50 48 46 45 43 44 46 49 54 63 67 64 60 55 50 46
Tung Chung 30 25 22 20 20 23 27 32 34 35 35 35 35 37 39 39 40 40 42 40 38 36 34 32
Tai Po 34 28 24 22 23 26 36 46 45 37 33 31 30 31 33 35 40 45 49 49 45 42 40 37
Sha Tin 34 29 24 22 22 24 33 39 38 32 27 25 23 23 25 29 34 38 43 46 45 42 41 38
Tap Mun 10 10 9 10 10 10 10 10 11 12 12 11 10 9 9 10 10 11 12 11 11 11 10 10
Causeway Bay 64 50 45 41 41 42 58 79 85 88 91 98 102 106 107 106 103 103 102 97 90 87 84 73
Central 59 51 46 42 40 42 55 75 95 95 95 96 93 92 98 102 102 106 112 102 88 80 74 70
Mong Kok 62 46 41 39 38 40 57 71 81 83 85 88 92 98 100 105 107 108 107 98 87 84 80 75
Pollutant: Carbon Monoxide Station Hr01 Hr02 Hr03 Hr04 Hr05 Hr06 Hr07 Hr08 Hr09 Hr10 Hr11 Hr12 Hr13 Hr14 Hr15 Hr16 Hr17 Hr18 Hr19 Hr20 Hr21 Hr22 Hr23 Hr24
Tsuen Wan 609 572 548 539 548 563 627 685 704 683 668 647 638 646 645 648 652 675 705 722 713 697 685 653
Tseung Kwan O 560 533 520 497 505 510 560 572 550 527 520 509 505 503 501 501 509 533 557 579 586 588 596 587
Yuen Long 639 622 600 585 578 584 637 676 651 617 602 590 586 586 584 587 600 625 670 701 712 700 688 670
Tuen Mun 683 665 656 638 667 681 686 738 719 701 697 683 678 678 674 675 681 696 725 736 743 733 712 695
Tung Chung 547 540 528 529 529 540 559 567 566 564 570 569 569 575 578 563 562 561 575 574 577 575 574 564
Tap Mun 482 491 491 495 498 503 517 526 530 524 518 516 506 503 496 494 495 492 490 491 492 492 492 490
Causeway Bay 762 746 718 691 689 663 688 758 788 843 864 840 839 835 823 837 821 829 866 901 904 864 798 762
Central 779 757 731 727 714 729 755 810 856 900 905 880 882 896 884 884 877 912 950 957 960 905 831 808
Mong Kok 799 786 767 730 762 737 734 778 814 823 819 802 800 802 815 820 831 861 901 910 891 863 832 828
C8
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table C4 (Cont.): 2019 Diurnal Variations of Air Pollutants Concentrations
Pollutant: Ozone Station Hr01 Hr02 Hr03 Hr04 Hr05 Hr06 Hr07 Hr08 Hr09 Hr10 Hr11 Hr12 Hr13 Hr14 Hr15 Hr16 Hr17 Hr18 Hr19 Hr20 Hr21 Hr22 Hr23 Hr24
Central/Western 63 65 67 67 66 63 56 47 44 48 55 64 74 80 82 80 77 72 67 64 63 63 62 62
Eastern 64 66 68 68 66 62 52 43 44 49 57 67 76 78 79 78 74 70 69 67 65 64 63 62
Kwun Tong 57 63 63 63 62 56 45 39 40 45 51 59 66 70 69 68 65 60 55 54 56 57 55 55
Sham Shui Po 52 56 58 57 56 51 41 34 34 40 47 55 61 64 64 63 57 49 45 45 48 50 49 49
Kwai Chung 45 51 52 52 51 46 37 29 30 35 44 51 58 60 59 57 51 45 41 41 43 44 43 43
Tsuen Wan 45 50 53 53 51 46 36 31 34 41 49 56 62 66 68 67 61 53 44 39 41 41 40 41
Tseung Kwan O 59 62 63 62 59 55 48 51 59 68 76 85 91 96 99 98 95 88 81 74 69 67 62 60
Yuen Long 43 42 44 44 41 37 29 27 36 48 60 71 82 88 90 85 77 66 55 47 44 43 41 40
Tuen Mun 46 46 47 47 45 39 32 28 33 41 50 60 71 79 83 81 73 60 49 44 43 43 44 45
Tung Chung 51 52 53 53 52 47 42 39 44 50 57 65 76 83 88 89 83 75 63 57 55 54 53 53
Tai Po 51 51 52 50 47 43 35 31 40 54 66 78 88 92 93 91 85 76 66 60 57 55 53 52
Sha Tin 52 53 56 55 53 50 41 39 47 59 71 81 89 95 97 93 86 79 69 61 56 53 52 50
Tap Mun 68 65 62 60 58 57 56 58 63 70 81 92 101 108 110 109 107 101 95 89 82 77 73 71
Causeway Bay 32 39 42 44 42 40 30 19 17 17 20 22 25 25 27 27 30 28 27 27 27 27 27 30
Central 41 45 48 49 49 46 36 26 20 22 25 29 36 41 40 38 37 33 28 30 33 36 37 37
Mong Kok 35 43 46 46 44 42 29 21 19 22 25 30 33 34 35 33 30 27 25 26 30 30 29 29
Pollutant: Respirable Suspended Particulates (PM10)
Station Hr01 Hr02 Hr03 Hr04 Hr05 Hr06 Hr07 Hr08 Hr09 Hr10 Hr11 Hr12 Hr13 Hr14 Hr15 Hr16 Hr17 Hr18 Hr19 Hr20 Hr21 Hr22 Hr23 Hr24
Central/Western 28 27 27 27 27 26 26 27 29 30 32 33 32 32 33 34 34 33 32 32 33 32 31 30
Eastern 32 31 30 30 29 28 28 28 29 30 31 32 33 32 33 34 34 33 33 33 34 33 32 32
Kwun Tong 34 32 33 32 32 32 31 33 35 39 42 43 43 39 42 44 43 43 41 40 40 39 38 37
Sham Shui Po 32 30 29 28 27 27 27 28 29 31 32 33 33 33 35 37 39 39 38 38 38 37 35 33
Kwai Chung 27 26 25 24 24 24 24 25 26 28 29 29 29 30 31 33 34 33 33 33 31 30 30 28
Tsuen Wan 28 26 25 24 24 24 24 25 26 28 30 31 31 33 35 35 35 34 34 34 34 32 30 29
Tseung Kwan O 29 28 27 27 26 25 25 26 26 27 28 29 29 29 31 32 33 33 33 33 32 31 30 30
Yuen Long 35 33 33 32 31 31 31 33 35 37 39 41 41 41 42 41 42 41 42 41 41 39 37 36
Tuen Mun 39 38 36 35 35 34 34 36 38 41 42 43 43 43 45 46 46 46 45 45 44 44 42 40
Tung Chung 28 27 26 26 25 25 25 26 27 29 31 33 34 35 37 38 37 35 33 32 31 31 30 29
Tai Po 30 29 28 27 27 27 27 28 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 32 32 32 33 33 33 33 32 32
Sha Tin 29 27 27 26 25 25 25 26 26 27 28 29 28 28 28 29 30 31 32 31 31 31 31 30
Tap Mun 29 28 28 28 28 29 30 30 31 31 33 33 33 34 34 34 34 34 34 33 32 31 30 29
Causeway Bay 39 35 30 29 29 28 31 37 41 45 48 48 47 49 51 50 50 51 51 53 53 49 47 44
Central 35 31 31 30 29 29 30 33 35 38 39 40 40 39 41 41 41 40 39 40 40 40 38 37
Mong Kok 33 30 28 27 27 27 28 31 33 35 37 37 38 39 41 41 40 39 40 42 42 40 37 34
Pollutant: Fine Suspended Particulates (PM2.5)
Station Hr01 Hr02 Hr03 Hr04 Hr05 Hr06 Hr07 Hr08 Hr09 Hr10 Hr11 Hr12 Hr13 Hr14 Hr15 Hr16 Hr17 Hr18 Hr19 Hr20 Hr21 Hr22 Hr23 Hr24
Central/Western 19 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 19 20 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 21 21 22 22 22 21 20
Eastern 18 17 17 17 17 17 16 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 18 19 19 18 18 19 20 19 18 18
Kwun Tong 19 18 17 18 17 17 17 18 19 21 22 22 22 21 22 23 23 23 22 23 23 23 21 20
Sham Shui Po 18 17 16 16 15 15 16 17 17 17 18 18 18 19 20 20 21 21 20 20 21 21 20 19
Kwai Chung 17 17 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 18 18 18 18 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 18
Tsuen Wan 19 17 17 16 16 16 17 17 18 19 19 20 20 22 23 23 23 22 22 23 23 22 21 20
Tseung Kwan O 17 17 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 17
Yuen Long 18 18 17 17 17 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 21 21 22 23 23 23 23 22 20 19
Tuen Mun 24 23 22 22 21 21 22 23 23 24 24 24 24 25 26 26 27 26 27 27 28 27 26 25
Tung Chung 18 18 17 16 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 23 22 21 21 20 20 19 19
Tai Po 20 19 19 18 18 18 18 19 20 21 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 21 21
Sha Tin 17 17 16 16 15 15 15 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 19 19 19 18
Tap Mun 16 16 16 16 16 17 18 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 18 18 17 16
Causeway Bay 25 22 19 19 18 18 19 24 26 28 29 29 29 32 32 31 31 32 33 35 36 33 31 29
Central 22 20 20 20 19 19 20 21 22 24 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 25 25 26 27 26 25 24
Mong Kok 22 20 19 18 18 19 19 21 22 24 24 24 25 27 27 27 26 26 27 29 30 28 25 23
Note:
1. All concentration units are in microgram per cubic metre ( g/m3 ).
C9
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table C5: 2019 Total Wet and Dry Deposition
(a) Wet Deposition
Monitoring Station Central/Western Kwun Tong Yuen Long
Wet Deposition (tonne/ha) 26166 15562 18289
Weighted Mean pH (based on
volume-weighted mean hydrogen ion
concentrations ([H+])
4.74 4.94 4.81
Weighted Mean pH (based on
volume-weighted mean pH) 4.98 5.22 5.05
Number of Samples 118 78 91
Filtrate
(kg/Ha)
+NH4 8.84 7.13 7.38
-NO3 45.37 27.38 33.33
2-SO4 32.85 19.67 22.03
Cl- 30.49 18.63 15.50
F- 0.67 0.42 0.51
Na+ 18.89 10.59 9.50
K+ 6.55 3.87 4.63
Formate 7.51 5.46 6.37
Acetate 5.53 3.49 4.84
Ca2+ 4.36 4.52 3.06
Mg2+ 2.30 1.29 0.89
* Note: The weighted mean pH is calculated from the pH values measured by the Government
Laboratory.
(b) Dry Deposition
Monitoring Station Central/Western Kwun Tong Yuen Long
Number of Samples 25 15 24
Filtrate
(kg/Ha)
NH4 + 0.56 0.82 0.11
-NO3 9.73 7.54 8.39
2-SO4 4.57 5.13 2.97
Cl- 9.06 10.39 3.93
F- 0.037 0.026 0.054
Na+ 6.83 5.25 2.68
K+ 0.47 0.39 0.31
Formate 0.19 0.12 0.22
Acetate 0.15 0.13 0.15
Ca2+ 4.39 4.39 5.42
Mg2+ 0.90 0.84 0.45
C10
Air Quality in Hong Kong 2019
Table C6: 2019 Ambient levels of Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPs)
Toxic Air Pollutants Concentration Unit Annual Averages [1]
Tsuen Wan [2] Central/Western
Heavy Metals
Hexavalent chromium
Lead [3]
ng/m3
ng/m3
0.11
11
0.11
10
Organic Substances
Benzene [2]
Benzo[a]pyrene
1,3-Butadiene
Formaldehyde
Perchloroethylene
Dioxins [4]
g/m3 ng/m3
g/m3 g/m3 g/m3
pgI-TEQ/m3
1.03
0.02
0.06
3.83
0.37
0.018
1.08
0.03
0.04
1.51
0.40
0.018
Notes:
[1] For TAP concentrations that are lower than the method detection limit (MDL), one half of the
MDL is used in calculating the annual averages.
[2] Due to the influence from renovation works at Princess Alexandra Community Centre and nearby
buildings of Tsuen Wan Station, the measurements of carbonyl compounds (formaldehyde) and volatile
organic compounds (benzene, 1,3-butadiene and perchloroethylene) at Tsuen Wan Station have been
temporarily relocated to Kwai Chung Station since January 2015.
[3] For lead, the reported figures are the respective 2019 annual average concentrations in the
elemental analysis of respirable suspended particulates.
[4] The ambient level of dioxins is expressed here as toxic equivalent (I-TEQ) concentration of
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) based on the International Toxic Equivalent Factors (I-TEF)
of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO/CCMS).
C11