all the fun of the fair: images of donnybrook fair by glew and watson
TRANSCRIPT
Irish Arts Review
All the Fun of the Fair: Images of Donnybrook Fair by Glew and WatsonAuthor(s): Brendan RooneySource: Irish Arts Review (2002-), Vol. 19, No. 1 (Summer, 2002), pp. 100-104Published by: Irish Arts ReviewStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25502842 .
Accessed: 12/06/2014 14:08
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Irish Arts Review is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Irish Arts Review(2002-).
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 195.78.109.54 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:08:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
PAINTING
All the Fun of the Fair
Images of Don ny brook Fair by G lew and Watson
Did Edward Glew's painting
of the colourful but
notorious Donnybrook Fair
borrow too much from
Samuel Watson's earlier
study of the same subject?
BRENDAN ROONEY
certainly thinks so.
In 1870, the Irish artist, Edward Lees Glew (1817-70), published Life in Dublin or Donnybrook Fair in
its Palmiest Days in Newark, New Jersey.1 In this sixty-eight page book, Glew provides an entertaining,
albeit selective, history of Dublin, a lengthy account of the development of Donnybrook Fair, and a
detailed description of his painting of that subject and its reception in the United States. Glew's style is
anecdotal and also polemical, as the text is interspersed with various political comments and asides. It is
not a manifesto, however, but essentially a vehicle for self-promotion, as the final self-congratulatory pages
present reprints of positive American reviews of his own painting entitled Donnybrook Fair (Fig 1) which
inspired the book. But what Glew fails to acknowledge is that his painting is, in fact, an embellishment of
a work (Fig 3) completed nearly two decades earlier by his compatriot, Samuel Watson (1818-67).
Biographical information about Glew is scarce.2 He was born in Dublin on 3 May 1817 and attended
Trinity College, but left university to become a portrait painter without completing his degree. It is not
known where, or from whom, he received his artistic training, but it may have been on the Continent.3 By
1849 he was sufficiently established to have six paintings, four of them watercolours, exhibited at the Royal
Hibernian Academy. However, this was also the last time he was to exhibit there as, within a couple of years,
he moved to Walsall in the English midlands. He founded a newspaper in Birmingham and, in 1856, pub
lished A History of the Borough and Foreign of Walsall, in the County of Stafford* He may also have worked in
Scotland. Glew subsequently moved to America, practising as a painter in New York, Philadelphia, Trenton,
and Newark where he died on 9 October 1870. In America, he contributed to the 'Saddle Bags' section of
:$C5?%^V$%
IIP*
f?&
t?All
1 00
?
IRISH ARTS REVIEW SIMMER 2002
This content downloaded from 195.78.109.54 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:08:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
the Northern Monthly Magazine and produced a series of works
entitled 'Pen and Ink Sketches' which were illustrated in the
Trenton Monitor. He appears to have been well regarded in
America and was described by a journalist with the Gazette and
Republican (10 Aug 1865) as 'courteous and obliging'. The fair at Donnybrook, which dated back to the 13th
century, commenced each year on 26 August and ran officially
for eight days.5 However, the Lord Mayor had the prerogative to
extend its duration, and festivities in the 19th century frequently
continued for over two weeks until 1837, when Lord Mayor
William Hodges restricted it to one week, excluding the
Sabbath.6 It drew huge crowds from all over the country and
served as an important occasion for the sale of livestock and
wares as well as the provision of entertainment. Contemporary
sources record that it was common practice for patrons to don
their finest clothes when visiting the fair and to indulge zealously
in the variety of food, drink, and entertainment available.
However, alcohol, high spirits, and a general disregard for
authority often led to unruly celebration and Donnybrook
eventually became identified with excess and abandon.
It was this chaos that Watson and, in turn, Glew attempted to
capture in their paintings. The apparent alacrity with which the
brawling men in Watson's painting make use of sticks (shillelaghs)
is alarming, but consistent with accounts of the excesses of the
fair.7 The press could be relied upon to emphasise more extreme
incidents, with headlines such as 'Riot at Donnybrook Fair' and
'A Drunken Man Eaten Up in a Great Measure by a Pig', which
appeared in The Times in August 1799 and February 1833 respec
tively. Though Glew contends that it was unusual for a fight to
'spread any sensation beyond the circle to which it was confined',
newspapers record that many became extremely violent and in
some cases resulted in serious injury and death. Glew claims that
a fight at the fair was 'regarded as an indispensable pastime' and
views such behaviour as, in effect, beyond censure. He talks with
mirth of regular bouts between executives of the law and 'the
McDonald men, or "mud-islanders'",8 which were considered
to be opportunities to settle scores. Other brawls were entirely
gratuitous, Glew stating that the character in his painting who
takes off his jacket as a challenge to fight does so lest he becomes
'blue mouldy for the want of a batin".9
Glew reflects in his text that at Donnybrook Fair, 'whiskey and
witticism, courting and cudgelling, frolic and fisticuff here reigned
supreme' and that ...to wend one's way through the motley crowds
amid the forest of tents, peep-shows, merry-go-rounds, unhitched donkey
carts, fruit stands, toy stands, impromptu cooking arrangements, and
all the other concomitants of an Irish fair, and at the same time escape
a kick from some irascible jack-ass, a trip up from some bewildered
"grunter, "
or a scalding from the steaming cauldrons of corned beef and
cabbage, which spread out in every direction, was a task by no means
easy to accomplish, especially so, when accompanied by the incessant
and deafening din arising from countless gongs, fifes, bag pipes, fiddles,
blowing of horns, croaking of ballad mongers, and the hoarse shoutings
of rival mountebanks...]0
Watson's picture provided Glew with a carefully-composed
model on which to base his own painting. He may have held
Watson in high regard and it is
interesting to note similarities
in their subject matter beyond
Donnybrook Fair. Watson, an
accomplished engraver and
book illustrator,11 produced
lithographs of a number of
Irish nationalist figures includ
ing William Smith O'Brien, Kevin O'Doherty, John
Mitchel, and Charles Gavan
Duffy.12 Glew himself produced a group portrait, exhibited at
the Royal Hibernian Academy in 1849, of the leaders of
the Irish Confederation in
council13 which featured both
Mitchel14 and Smith O'Brien
(Fig 2). The individual portraits in that painting were based
on daguerrotypes by Leon
Gluckman, lithographs of
which were produced by James
Henry and published in 1848.15
It is likely that Glew saw
Watson's A Scene at Donnybrook
Fair at the Royal Hibernian
Academy in Dublin, where it
was exhibited in 1846. It was
an impressive and elaborate view, probably unsurpassed in
ambition until Erskine Nicol exhibited his picture of the same
subject at the Royal Scottish Academy in 1860.
Glew's claims for the accuracy of his painting are unsound in
two respects. Firstly, though he almost certainly drew on personal
experience when working on Donnybrook Fair, the picture was
fundamentally based on Samuel Watson's observations, not his
own. Secondly, it is likely that Watson himself was somewhat
circumspect in his handling of the subject. A large number of
Irish painters and illustrators turned their attention to
Glew claims that a
fight at the fair was
'regarded as an
indispensable
pastime' and views
such behaviour
as, in effect,
beyond censure.
1 Edward Lees G lew
(1817-1870):
Donnybrook Fair, 1865. Oil on canvas.
104 x 161 cm.
(Private Collection)
2 Edward Lees Glew:
Leaders of the Irish
Confederation, exh
RHA, 1849. Oil on
canvas. 63 x 76 cm.
(National Gallery of Ireland)
al
SUMMER 2002 IRISH ARTS REVIEW
This content downloaded from 195.78.109.54 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:08:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
ALL THE FUN OF THE FAIR: IMAGES OF DONNYBROOK FAIR BY GLEW AND WATSON
Donnybrook Fair during the first half of the 19th century.16 Scenes of festive bonhomie, typically juxtaposed with debauchery
and chaos, satisfied a growing appetite for genre subjects in
Ireland. William Sadler,17 Daniel Maclise, c.182618 and George
Victor du Noyer,19 produced complex images of the fair, as did
Francis Wheatley and Samuel Lover. Erskine Nicol chose the fair
as the subject for a number of paintings, including A Shebeen at
Donnybrook (1851),20 his monumental Donnybrook Fair (1859), and
Whistling and Whittling (1855)21 in which a poster in the back
ground announces the abolition of the event. Artists were
evidently drawn to the variety of individuals visible there and the
vigour and comedy of their activity.
Glew obviously adopted the overall composition from
Watson's painting22 but introduced significant extra detail into the
right-hand foreground and omitted,
Ultimately, Glew
combined types and typical events,
which he extracted
from Watson's
model with new
elements, which he
found particularly
interesting, or
thought had
particular
significance for
Dublin and the fair.
or amended, some of the local
detail, such as Donnybrook
Church.23 For the comic and dra
matic, as distinct from journalistic
detail, Glew relies heavily on
Watson24 and makes little or no
changes to Watson's most animated
protagonists. He retains, for exam
ple, the figure in the centre who
recoils from a blow to the chin
with arms outstretched and a dog
tugging at his coat-tails and the
character who leaps from or over a
cart on the right of the composition
as well as the rather dishevelled fig
ure who delves in his pocket for
money to buy a couple of pigs from
an aproned vendor. Glew re-inter
prets other figures, making the
woman in the foreground of
Watson's picture who flees a brawl
(holding a glass in her outstretched
hand) come to the assistance of the
person who tumbles over a ram
pant pig. Further back, an old man
playing a fairground game in
Watson's picture is supplanted in Glew's by the pathetic figure of
'a wooden-legged pensioner ... engaged in shooting at a target for
hazel nuts.'25 Other figures receive similar treatment.26
Seamas O Maiti? has pointed out that by the 1840s signs at the fair with political content 'usually proclaimed that the
proprietor was a repealer.'27 This is certainly true of the images
of O'Connell that appear with equal prominence in Watson's
and Glew's paintings.28 Portraits of O'Connell, the celebrated
champion of Catholic Emancipation (achieved in 1829), were ubiquitous in 19th-century Ireland and represented a
significant part of what Fergus O'Fer rail has referred to as the
'O'Connell industry'.29
In Life in Dublin, Glew expands upon narratives that are not
obvious in the painting. He explains, for instance, that the two
most prominent figures in the tent to the left dance to the
celebrated Donnybrook jig, played by a 'characteristic blind
harper' and a 'half-boozy "ould boy" on the fiddle'.30 He also says
that a young man at the entrance to the tent 'tenderly opposes'
the 'bashful scruples' of his fianc?e by encouraging her to accept
another gentleman's invitation to dance.31 The young boys in the
foreground on the left engage in a game of 'prodding' for corned
beef and cabbage, while the figure who leans against the entrance
of the tent on the left plays the 'trump' or 'jew's harp' which Glew
claims was a favourite instrument among the youth of Dublin.
Glew even makes room for such unlikely characters as 'Peggy the
man', a milk vendor from Harold's Cross of uncertain gender,
who carries milk cans on the left of the picture.32 Young 'horse
boys' behind the tent play 'pitch and toss',33 while 'Oney', an older
gent whose expressed mission in life was to attend funerals,
stands in the foreground wearing a linen apron and ribboned
top-hat and holds a lone white cane which he assumed would sig
nify the importance of his role. In the foreground on the right
Zozimus (alias Mike Moran), a travelling composer, balladeer, and
raconteur, holds forth to a small but zealous audience, one of
whom, a young fruit-seller, is so absorbed that he drops his
wares.34 The indistinct character in the top hat and swallowtail
coat who stands at the shooting gallery with his back to the viewer
is, according to Glew, another well-known Dublin eccentric called
'Hewey. Glew mentions a number of amusements available to the
public, such as the 'Trick o' the loop' (taking place on a barrel in
the right foreground) and the 'Thimble rig (on the extreme right), both of which involved tricking gullible members of the public out of a ha'penny. Behind these, 'Sporting Molly from County
Down' sits behind her roulette wheel among her patrons, who
include 'Tibby-Tight Tisdall', the figure leaning forward with his
hands under his coat-tails.
Calvert's Royal Theatre, the sign for which is easily legible in
both paintings, was notorious for providing its audience with
vigorous rather than subtle performances of Shakespeare.35 These
elaborate travelling theatres became characteristic of the fair and
often featured raised platforms or balconies from which the
dramatis personae could attract their audience. Glew identifies
the figures of Hamlet, who leans against the rails to the right, in
his 'conventional cloak and hat with nodding plumes', the king
and queen 'in their glittering crowns and tawdry robes of state',
and Ophelia (on the left-hand side of the theatre front) who 'endeavors [sic] to sustain exhausted nature by diving into a
pot of "brown stout"'.36
Watson may well have included portraits of Donnybrook char
acters in his painting of 1842, but left no means of identifying
them. Glew, in contrast, describes many in detail. Just inside the
entrance to Paddy Kelly's tent on the right, the artist tells us,
the blind musician, Patrick Byrne, plays the harp. This tent, a
'rendezvous for all the literatteurs, wits and notables of the day'37
was an annual feature of the fair 38
and its introduction is Glew's
single most significant divergence from Watson's model. It not
only balances the composition, but it also provides Glew with the
opportunity to include portraits of some significant social and
political figures in Dublin. 'Cantering Jack', who was renowned
102 I
IRISH ARTS REVIEW SUMMER 2002
This content downloaded from 195.78.109.54 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:08:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
4
t?34- IM. 01
WT
44?
for his ability to run alongside mail coaches over long distances,
is obscured by Thomas Steele and Thomas Reynolds, the city
marshal,39 who are deep in conversation. 'Honest Tom Steele'
(1788-1848), as he became known, from County Clare, was a
Protestant landowner and soldier who in 1823 became a trench
ant supporter of Catholic emancipation and a close associate of
O'Connell.40 Significantly, by including him in the painting, Glew
necessarily dates the scene to before 1848. The portrait is specu
lative, or at least posthumous, which mitigates further Glew's
claims of authenticity. Representing the literary and artistic
community are the writer, William Carleton and the painter,
poet, and writer, Samuel Lover, who sit at a table just inside the
entrance to the tent. Carleton (1794-1869), born in Tyrone but
subsequently based in Dublin, wrote a number of books, such as
Traits and Stories of the Irish Peasantry (1832) which was seen as a
perspicacious analysis of the character of the Irish peasant and
was widely praised.
Ultimately, Glew combined types and typical events, which he
extracted from Watson's model with new elements, which he
found particularly interesting, or thought had particular signifi
cance for Dublin and the fair. The painting was exhibited in
March 1865 at the Grand Banquet of The Knights of St Patrick at
the Metropolitan Hotel, New York. Hanging above the speaker's
rostrum and lit with bright gas-jets, it was 'the most prominent
object in the hall'41 and commanded the attention of the large
number of journalists who reported on the event. Glew later
showed the painting at the Chicago Sanitary Fair, then in his
rooms at 21 East State Street, Trenton in July, and next at the
Annual Prize Exhibition of the Philadelphia Sketch Club, held at
the Philadelphia Academy of Fine Arts in December. He therefore
addressed an audience which he assumed would have no access to
Watson's picture or knowledge of any print after it42 and would
have had no reason to worry that the vagaries of the late 20th
century art market should place the two pictures before the
public for the first time and thus expose his deceit.43 In 1870, the
picture was in the possession of E D Bassford of the Cooper
Institute, New York, who purchased it without the knowledge of
the artist44 and valued it 'at no less than $12,000',45 This incident
prompted Glew to undertake the production of a 'mammoth
picture' of Donnybrook Fair, 'spread' according to the Newark
Morning Register (6 April 1870) 'over nearly sixty-four feet of
canvas'. It is unclear whether the painting, based on the exhibited
version, was completed before the artist's death.
Admittedly, at one point in Life in Dublin, Glew does confess
to taking liberties with his design. By depicting students from
Trinity College, who fight 'their natural antagonists, the coal
3 Samuel Watson
(1818-1867): A Scene at
Donnybrook Fair, 1847. Oil on
canvas. 130 x 213 cm. (Private
Collection)
(Courtesy of
Sotheby's)
SUMMER 2002 IRISH ARTS REVIEW |
103
This content downloaded from 195.78.109.54 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:08:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
porters',46 in their collegiate caps, he says that he was merely
taking advantage of the 'licence afforded to poets and painters'.47
However, this admission seems distinctly disingenuous when one
realises that a fight between 'town and gown',48 as Glew calls it,
takes place in the same part of Watson's composition and in that
case too, the students don mortar-boards.49
Glew's painting is well-executed and impressive, but strangely
unconvincing. Though Glew was by no means the first artist to
quote from another, few flaunted their plagiarism with such
audacity. Life in Dublin or Donnybrook Fair in its Palmiest Days is an
extraordinary exercise in self-aggrandisement. By comparing
Glew's painting favourably with Daniel Maclise's Snap-Apple
Night, David Wilkie's Penny Wedding and, even more improbably,
William Powell Frith's Derby Day, the American journalists cited
in Glew's text indulge the artist's fiction. On the other hand,
perhaps one should admire his opportunism and the confidence
with which he presents an Irish subject on a grand scale to an
American audience. S?amas O Maiti? has asserted that 'there
was a sense in which the Fair Green became a set on which the
fair-goers themselves became actors.'50 It might be said that it also
provided Glew with the opportunity for a grand performance.
Brendan Rooney is Research Fellow at the National Gallery of Ireland and the
author, with Nicola Figgis, of Irish Paintings in the National Gallery of Ireland
(2001), reviewed in this issue.
1 A copy of Glew's book is held in Yale University
Library. The author is extremely grateful to the
Yale Library for making the text available and to
the staff of the New York Public Library for their
assistance in tracing the book.
2 One relies on W Strickland, A Dictionary of Irish
Artists (Dublin 1913) and Glew's own comments.
3 A correspondent with the Trenton Monitor (31
July 1865) maintains that Glew was 'a graduate of
the best European Schools of Art', but does not
specify which.
4 Walter Strickland mistakenly claims that Glew
published the book in 1852.
5 For a detailed account of the development and
ultimate abolition of the fair, see S ? Maiti?, The
Humours of Donnybrook: Dublin's Famous Fair
and its Suppression (Dublin 1995). 6 See S ? Maiti?, 'Changing Images of Donnybrook
Fair 1800-1850', in D Cronin, J Gilligan and K
Holton (eds), Irish Fairs and Markets (Dublin
2001) p. 165.
7 EL Glew, Life in Dublin or Donnybrook Fair in its
Palmiest Days (Newark 1870) p.35. The phrase 'to have a Donnybrook' is still in use in American
English. 8 Glew (as note 7) p.38. 9 Glew (as note 7) p.44. The figure in question is
just left of centre, stretching out his fist.
10 Glew (as note 7) p.26. 11 Watson was reputedly one of the first artists to
practise chromo-lithography in Dublin. See
Strickland (as note 2) vol 2, p.509 12 Strickland (as note 2) vol 2, p.509. 13 The Irish Confederation, established in 1847,
comprised members of the Young Irelanders who
had seceded from the Repeal Association. It was
associated closely with militant nationalism.
Glew's group portrait was exhibited at the Irish
Exhibition at Olympia in 1888. For a discussion of
that event, see B Rooney, 'The Irish Exhibition at
Olympia, 1888', Irish Architectural and
Decorative Studies, vol I (1998) pp. 100-19
14 Mitchel (1815-75), a solicitor and Young Irelander, succeeded Thomas Davis as chief political writer
for The Nation. He became frustrated with the con
servatism of the Young Irelanders and resigned from both The Nation and the Irish Confederation
and established the United Irishman newspaper. He was convicted of treason-felony in May 1848
and transported to Tasmania.
15 A series of these prints is in the National Gallery of Ireland. The figures in the picture also include
Thomas Francis Meagher and John Martin.
16 See ? Maiti? (as note 6) pp. 164-79.
17 Private collection. See A M Dalsimer and V
Kreilkamp, America's Eye. Irish Paintings from
the Collection of Brian P Burns, exh. cat. Boston
College Museum of Art (Boston 1996) p.73.
18 Maclise's drawing is in the Victoria and Albert
Museum. See N Weston, Irish Artists in Victorian
London (Dublin 2001) p.28. 19 For a lithograph by W Collins after du Noyer's
drawing of 1830, see George Victor du Noyer 1817-1869: Hidden Landscapes, exh. cat.
National Gallery of Ireland (Dublin 1995) p.28. 20 See Christie's, Irish Pictures (9 May 1996). 21 See Gorry Gallery (April 1989) no 19. Nicol pro
duced an almost identical version of this picture in
watercolour which is also in a private collection.
22 According to Glew, the main thoroughfare was
named Sackville Street in honour of Dublin's main
street which 'in point of width and beauty may be
said to have no rival.' Glew (as note 7) p.27. 23 Glew does retain the distinctive large red house
visible in the background to the right of Watson's
composition, but places it much further away. A
new Catholic church, opened to the public in
Donnybrook in 1866, was dedicated to the
Sacred Heart 'in reparation for all the sins com
mitted on the Fair Green over the centuries'. ?
Maiti? (as note 5) p.51. 24 Watson himself may have been influenced by
Maclise. The dramatic manner in which a fruit
seller is upended by a pig trying to escape its
tether in his picture (a detail copied verbatim by Glew) may have been inspired by Maclise's draw
ing, The Pattern Tent, which was illustrated in A
M Hall's Sketches of Irish Character (1842). See
J Turpin, 'Maclise as a Book Illustrator', Irish Arts
Review, vol 2, no 2 (Summer 1985) p.24. 25 Glew (as note 7) p.49. The Royal Hospital in
Ki I ma in ham, where this veteran would have
resided, served as a retreat for old soldiers from
1684 until 1929.
26 For example, the two drunken male figures who
disappear arm in arm behind the drinks tent on
the left hand side in Watson's painting, stagger towards the viewer in the same position in Glew's
composition. 27 ? Maiti? (as note 5) p. 19.
28 In Watson's picture, the proprietor of this estab
lishment is 'Thos. [illegible] from Bally....bridge, while in Glew's, it is Larry Byrne from Greystones.
29 F O'Ferrall, 'Daniel O'Connell, the 'Liberator',
1775-1847, in B P Kennedy and R Gillespie (eds), Ireland: Art into History (Dublin 1994) p. 102. In
his essay, O'Ferrall provides a useful overview of
the proliferation of images of O'Connell and the
manner in which they were used.
30 Glew (as note 7) p.41. 31 Glew (as note 7) p.41. 32 Glew (as note 7) p.42. Peg, or Peggy the Man,
married Dandyorum, a friend of Zozimus, at the
fair. The ceremony was conducted by 'Tack'em' a
maverick German clergyman from Rathmines, who for a fee married any couple that presented
themselves to him. ? Maiti? (as note 5) p.26. 33 This game involved betting on the toss of a coin
or coins.
34 In 1842, Zozimus was charged with being drunk
and falling over a crippled man. He claimed in
court that he had been assaulted by the person in
question. ? Maiti? (as note 5) p.25. 35 Turnover was of paramount importance and per
formances were notoriously short. The theatres
were also frequently overcrowded which led to
regular fracas. See ? Maiti? (as note 5) p.24. 36 Glew (as note 7) pp.29-30. 37 Glew (as note 7) p.27. 38 Glew claims that the proprietor of Paddy Kelly's
Tent owned a tavern in D'Olier Street, Dublin dur
ing the period in which the painting is set. The tent
was named after Paddy Kelly's Budget which,
having been established in 1832, was the earliest
of a number of satirical social magazines to report on the fair. See ? Maiti? (as note 5) p. 19.
39 This Thomas Reynolds should not be confused
with his namesake who was the principal informer against the United Irishmen in 1798.
40 Steele was so dismayed by the death of O'Connell
in 1848 that he attempted suicide by throwing himself into the Thames from Waterloo Bridge. He survived, but died a few days later and was
buried beside O'Connell in Glasnevin cemetery. 41 New York Tribune (18 Mar 1865). 42 The detail in which Glew copies elements of
Watson's picture suggests that he may have
acquired an engraving after it. No such engraving is known, but as Watson was a skilled engraver, it
seems likely that one existed.
43 Glew's Donnybrook Fair was sold at Christie's
London in 1981 (18 Nov; lot 107) and Watson's
A Scene at Donnybrook Fair in Sotheby's Irish
Sale of 1997 (22 May, lot 189). 44 Newark Daily Journal (6 Apr 1870). 45 Newark Evening Courier (7 Mar 1870). Glew
attempted to buy the painting back from Bassford
for the price the wealthy shop owner originally
paid, but Bassford declined.
46 Glew (as note 7) p.35. ? Maiti? corroborates
Glew's suggestion that the coal-porters were par
ticularly prone to violent behaviour.
47 Glew (as note 7) p.35. 48 Glew (as note 7) p.35. This was evidently a well
used phrase, as ? Maiti? quotes it in a different
context from the Irish Penny Journal of 22 Aug 1840. See ? Maiti? (as note 6) p. 175.
49 ? Maiti? maintains that the main antagonistic
rivalry of the 18th century was that between 'the
Liberty weavers on the south side and the
Ormond butchers on the north side of the Liffey'. This had sectarian, rather than strictly class, ori
gins. ? Maiti? (as note 5) p.32. 50 ? Maiti? (as note 5) p.21.
104 I
IRISH ARTS REVIEW SUMMER 2002
This content downloaded from 195.78.109.54 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:08:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions