brakman, garretsen, and van marrewijk, 2008 figure 1.1 world bank regional classification
Post on 01-Apr-2015
221 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.1 World Bank regional classification
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
a. Land area, 2005
12%
7%
15%
4%
18%
18%
26% EAP
MNA
LAC
SAS
ECA
SSA
High
Figure 1.2 Life expectancy and regional shares of population, land, and income, 2005
b. Population, 2005
28%
5%
9%23%
7%
12%
16%EAP
MNA
LAC
SAS
ECA
SSA
High
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.2 Life expectancy and regional shares of population, land, and income, 2005
c. GDP, current $, 2005
7%1%
6%2%5%1%
78%
EAP
MNA
LAC
SAS
ECA
SSA
High
d. GDP, PPP, 2005
18%
3%
8%
8%
7%
3%
53%
EAP
MNA
LAC
SAS
ECA
SSA
High
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.2 Life expectancy and regional shares of population, land, and income, 2005
e. Life expectancy at birth, 2005
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
EAP MNA LAC SAS ECA SSA High
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.3 Characteristics of global regions, 2005
a. Birth & death rates (per 1000), 2005
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
EAP MNA LAC SAS ECA SSA High
birth rate death rate
b. GDP/capita (cons tant 2000 $), 2005
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
EAP MNA LAC SAS ECA SSA High
GDP/cap GDP/cap PPP
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.3 Characteristics of global regions, 2005
c. Pop. dens ity (people/km 2), 2005
34 27
307
20 31 31
119
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
EAP MNA LAC SAS ECA SSA High
d. Urban population (% of total), 2005
57
77
28
64
35
78
41
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
EAP MNA LAC SAS ECA SSA High
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.3 Characteristics of global regions, 2005
e. CO2 em iss ions (tons /cap), 2002
3.22.4
1.0
6.7
0.7
12.8
2.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
EAP MNA LAC SAS ECA SSA High
f. Aid (% of GNP), 2005
1.7
0.40.8 0.7
5.2
0.30
1
2
3
4
5
6
EAP MNA LAC SAS ECA SSA High
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.3 Characteristics of global regions, 2005
g. Arable land (hect./person), 2005
0.18
0.27
0.14
0.57
0.25
0.37
0.11
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
EAP MNA LAC SAS ECA SSA High
h. Exports (% of GDP), 2005
34.8
25.9
18.9
38.642.9
22.4
34.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
EAP MNA LAC SAS ECA SSA High
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.4 Sectoral distribution of GDP, global regions, 2005
Sectoral distribution of GDP (value added, share of total)
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
SSA MNA ECA SAS LAC EAP High
Services
Industry
Agriculture
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.5 Core – periphery structures in Europe (based on GDP pps)
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.6 The Rank-Size Distribution for India (Urban agglomerations, 2001)
Rank-size distribution for India (urban agglomerations, 2001)
ln(rank-1/2) = 19.032 - 1.1288 ln(s ize)
R2 = 0.9842
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
12 13 14 15 16 17ln(size)
ln(r
ank-
1/2)
Mumbai
Kolkata
Delhi
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.7 The Hard Disk Drive value chain
Substrate
Media
Motors
Head-StackAssembly
Head-GimbalAssembly
HeadFabrication
Semiconductors PCB Stuffing and OtherElectronics Assembly
Head-DiskAssembly
FinalAssembly
Testing
ComponentFabricationActivities
SubassemblyActivities
FinalAssemblyActivities
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.8 Gravity equation: german exports and distance, 2005
a. German exports, 2005 (million euro)
0
12
5 10ln(distance)
ln(e
xport)
USAFrance
Czech Rep
Poland
Netherlands
China
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.8 Gravity equation: german exports and distance, 2005
b. German exports, income adjusted 2005 (million euro)
0
8
5 10ln(distance)
ln(e
xport) - 0.9
79 ln
(GD
P)
USA
France
Czech Rep
Poland
Netherlands
China
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.9 Share of urban population in Europe
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
year
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.10 Share of world output, selected countries, 1960-2005
a. China, share of world output (% of total)
0
3
6
9
12
15
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
constant 2000 US $
PPP, cons tant 2000 int. $
b. Singapore, share of world output (% of total)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
cons tant 2000 US $
PPP, cons tant 2000 int. $
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.10 Share of world output, selected countries, 1960-2005
c. South Korea, share of world output (% of total)
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
cons tant 2000 US $
PPP, cons tant 2000 int. $
d. Japan, share of world output (% of total)
0
4
8
12
16
20
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
cons tant 2000 US $
PPP, cons tant 2000 int. $
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 1.11 Major orientation of the continents
Americas
Eurasia
AfricaAmericas
Eurasia
Africa
top related