1texas nodal nodal day-ahead market update special natf meeting july 19, 2010
Post on 03-Jan-2016
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1 Texas Nodal
Nodal Day-Ahead Market
Update
Special NATF Meeting July 19, 2010
2 Texas Nodal
Outline of Discussion
•Day-Ahead Market Design/Processes/Procedures
•Key DAM Integration (model, contingencies, LDFs)
•DAM configuration (shift factor cutoff, use of shadow price caps)
•Software and Data issues and impacts
•Other deliveries (Redacted Model, NPRR206 eFactor values)
•DAM Analysis• Analysis of July 15, 2010 DAM• Some case analysis for previous DAM
Agenda
3 Texas Nodal
Objective of Workshop today
• Focus on quality of solution:
• Shared understanding of design, process, integration
• Feedback from market on observed issues (software and data)
• How to improve/leverage market trial activities and scenarios
• Out of scope for workshop
• Debates on implemented design
• Significant changes in reporting of results
Meeting Objective
4 Texas Nodal
DAM Design/Processes/Procedures
• Section 4 Nodal Protocols Day Ahead Operations
• http://nodal.ercot.com/protocols/index.html
• MMS Business Requirements and Conceptual System Design
• http://nodal.ercot.com/docs/pd/mms/index.html#req
• http://nodal.ercot.com/docs/pd/mms/index.html#des
• DAM Operating Procedures
• http://nodal.ercot.com/readiness/markettrials/dam/index.html
DAM Design/Process/Procedures
5 Texas Nodal
DAM Procedure Summary
•0600 DAM Operator validates posting
•0700 Phase 2/Credit Validation
•1000 DAM submissions closed
•DAM sub-process summary: (next slide)
DAM Design/Process/Procedures
I. Day-ahead market – clearing process
Execute DAMExecute DRUC
Execute Ancillary Service Insufficiency Check
Execute PTP Options Derating
Execute DAM Clearing Engine
Midnight 0600 1000 1430 1800
Communicate DAM Results
Execute CRR Simultaneous Feasibility TestCalculate and Post AS Obligation
Validate Inputs from QSEs
Day-Ahead
• Calculate and assign AS Plan quantity to each QSE based on Load Ratio Share.
• Calculate and assign AS Plan quantity to each QSE based on Load Ratio Share.• Validate inputs from QSEs
including Offers, Bids, Trades, Schedules (Self-Schedules and DC Tie Schedules), and Self-arranged AS.
• Validate inputs from QSEs including Offers, Bids, Trades, Schedules (Self-Schedules and DC Tie Schedules), and Self-arranged AS.
• Evaluate all CRRs using the Day-Ahead hourly Network Model.
• Evaluate all CRRs using the Day-Ahead hourly Network Model.• Determine, prior to clearing the DAM, if there are sufficient AS offers to meet the AS requirements.
• Determine, prior to clearing the DAM, if there are sufficient AS offers to meet the AS requirements.• Derate CRR Options
declared for Real-Time settlement for the purpose for DAM clearing.
• Derate CRR Options declared for Real-Time settlement for the purpose for DAM clearing.• Post-process the outputs of DAM Clearing Engine, and • Publish and communicate the DAM results to Settlement and MIS.
• Post-process the outputs of DAM Clearing Engine, and • Publish and communicate the DAM results to Settlement and MIS.
• Determine Unit Commitments, Energy, AS and CRR awards by optimizing the system-wide economical benefits given bids and offers.
• Determine Unit Commitments, Energy, AS and CRR awards by optimizing the system-wide economical benefits given bids and offers.
Slide 6
7 Texas Nodal
Key DAM Integration
Original or Reduced AS Plan
DAM Sub-ProcessesAS Plan
Validated AS Offers
Validated Self-Arrangement
AS Insufficiency Check
Network model
Outage Schedule
CRR
SPS/RAP
Load Zone Distribution
Factors
CRR Oversold Quantities
DAM Pre Processing
NCUC
Post Processing
NSM
SFTDerating CRR
Options
QSE Notification of Awards
Post Market information
DAM Information to
Settlement
Validated COP’s
Validated CRR Offers/PTP
Obligation Bids
Validated (3 part supply) Energy Bids/
Offers
DAM Clearing Process
Generic Constraints
Dynamic Ratings
Hub Distribution
Factors
Resource Parameters
RMR Contract
Data
IUC
Validated Energy, AS, Capcity Trades, Self
Schedules, DC-tie Schedules
DRUC Notification
of AS Insufficency
Price Validation & Correction
AS Obligation
RMR Offer Creator
RMR Operator
Derated Quantities of CRR PTP Options
declared for Settlement in RT
Settlement
Weighted Shift
Factor
8 Texas Nodal
High-Level Inputs most frequently inquired about by market• Network Operations Model
• Loaded weekly from NMMS into MMS for DAM,RUC,SCED• Connectivity, Ratings, Thermal Constraints, Contingencies
• Outages • Transmission outages from OS at 0600 Day-Ahead
• SPS/RAP• SPS/RAP definition from NMMS/CIM model
• Shift Factors calculated in DAM process (different from SCED)• Dynamic Ratings• From EMS at 0600 Day-Ahead
• Load Distribution Factors (Zone, Hub)• EMS – Normally, the State Estimate output of 7 days ago. Holidays will be different
• QSE COP• Current day COP used for temporal constraints of next day• COP HSL/LSL used for capacity available next day
Other Observations and Analysis
9 Texas Nodal
DAM Configuration questions
• Shift Factor Cutoff
• Set to 0.001 for Resource Node
• No cutoff for Load Zone & HUBs
• DAM Penalty Factors
• Not used in pricing, only for setting priority
• Ancillary Services
• RegUp = 3,000,000 $/MW
• RegDn = 3,000,000 $/MW
• RRS = 2,000,000 $/MW
• NSPSIN = 1,000,000 $/MW
• Transmission constraints: 350,000 – 1,000,000 $/MW
DAM Configurations
10 Texas Nodal
DAM Software and Data issues in progress
• Link to current DAM trials issues list:
•http://nodal.ercot.com/readiness/markettrials/dam/index.html
•MMS5-P8 delivering last week of July
• Performance limitations
•Energy Only offer/Bids limit: 15,000 / PTP bids: 15,000 /CRR option offers: 2,000
•Full volume can result in long-running DAM (not observed in trials)
• Data highlights:
•Updated contingency definitions coming Aug 2
•EMS still tuning LDF
•Workaround for Generic (Non-thermal) constraints
•Ratings
DAM Software and Data issues
11 Texas Nodal
Other functionality delivering to market trials to enhance DAM
• NPRR206- Credit eFactors (MMS5-P8)
• NPRR102- Redacted Network Model (target July 23)
Other DAM deliveries
DAM Analysis
12 Texas Nodal
Contents
• Analysis of July 15th DAM– Summary of OD 7/15 – Unconstrained study– MCPC for Ancillary Services– Negative MCPE analysis
• Some issues from other days’ DAM– LZ energy clearing constrained– Opportunity cost in MCPC– Constraints binding in DAM which supposed to be protected by
SPS • CRR-NOIE Offers (options in DAM)
13 Texas Nodal
DAM Submissions for OD 7/15
VALID CANCELLED TOTAL MA Limit
CRR 446 1 447 2,000
PTP 128 1 129 15,000
EO 516 37 553 15,000
ASO 298 2 300
S-AS 103 8 111
3PO 406 12 418
COP 652 1 653
14 Texas Nodal
15 Texas Nodal
Analysis of July 15th DAM
•Overall System Offers/Bids & Clearance
16 Texas Nodal
Analysis of July 15th DAM
•Load Zones Bids & Clearance
Price Difference Between Load Zone and Hub
$/MWh
17 Texas Nodal
Unconstrained Energy Clearing VS Constrained Energy Clearing
18 Texas Nodal
Analysis of July 15th DAM
• 17 Secured Equipments is bounded.• 20 Contingencies have associated Binding Constraints.
Equipment Name Total Constrained Hours560_A_1 246150__D 211660__A 21970__C 15
ECRSW_FMR1 12428T428_1 10
VALIMP 106146__A 8
LA_PAL_VCAVAZ1_1 72500__C 6
SILASRAY_T1 5SILASRAY_T2 5CKT_907_1 3
ALAZAN_B_DAVI1_1 3TEN_CRD1_1 2TEN_CRD2_1 2
260_A_1 1
19 Texas Nodal
Ancillary Service Study
20 Texas Nodal
REGUP Price Spike Study
Hour AS Plan (MW)
Self AS (MW)
DAM Buy (MW)
MCPC ($/MWh)
Total offer (MW)
1 1115.00 73.30 1,042 400.00 4279.40
2 680.00 47.50 633 27.91 4279.40
24 790.00 53.40 737 29.95 4239.40
RegUp information for Hour 1, 2 and 24
RegUp Offer structure for Hour 1
21 Texas Nodal
SPP Deviation
22 Texas Nodal
Settlement Point SWEC_G1 Price Study
The offers/bids at settlement point SWEC_G1 has large influence on a binding constraint from STASW to NDLNE. There is a negative price offer (-37.5 $/MWh) at the SP all the day with different quantities for each hour. At hour 9, the quantity is the biggest one and it became the marginal unit to set the SPP.
23 Texas Nodal
Load Zone clearing constrained
• Currently, DAM enforce all transmission line and transformer constraints for all voltage level modeled by ERCOT system
• For some constraints, especially lower KV, only reducing load behind the constraints can solve the congestion
• DAM cannot control the individual load. Instead, DAM have to limit the total cleared energy only bids & PTP sink to limit the load amount behind the congested line
• OD 7/9 DAM
DELIVERY_DATE Hour
CONTINGENCY_NAME CONSTR_NAME
LIMIT
SHADOW_PRICE
SHIFT_FACTOR STL_PNT
max possible clearing
actually clearing
7/9/2010 18 SVICMAG9 N_VICT_VICTOR1_1 76 7970.34 -0.0172666 LZ_SOUTH -4401.561396 -4401.6
7/9/2010 19 SVICMAG9 N_VICT_VICTOR1_1 76 9106.81 -0.0172267 LZ_SOUTH -4411.756169 -4411.8
7/9/2010 20 SVICMAG9 N_VICT_VICTOR1_1 76 11350.7 -0.0150318 LZ_SOUTH -5055.948057 -5055.9
7/9/2010 21 SVICMAG9 N_VICT_VICTOR1_1 76 1458.02 -0.0141437 LZ_SOUTH -5373.41714 -5373.4
7/9/2010 22 SVICMAG9 N_VICT_VICTOR1_1 76 413.22 -0.0137344 LZ_SOUTH -5533.550792 -5533.6
Note: actually clearing includes the net of Energy Only Offer/Bids, PTP obl and CRR for real time.
24 Texas Nodal
Opportunity Cost in MCPC
• OD 4/28 DAM – Hour 900 RegDn MCPC = 1021.74 $/MWh
– The marginal resource which was provide the last MW of Reg Down. In DAM solution, this resource has already been awarded the whole capacity up to HSL (3PO + RegUp + RRS =150 MW) and RegDn = 3PO – LSL =75.92 MW
– If system need 1 more MW of Reg Down, this resource shall increase 1 MW energy and reduce 1 MW either RegUp or RRS. Reduced 1 MW RegUp/RRS will be provided by marginal offers of RegUp/RRS which is at 1001.01 $/MWh based on MCPC for RegUp/RRS. Increased 1 MW energy will require other resources to reduce total 1 MW and the cost change will be the LMP at resource node. Therefore,
– RegDn MCPC = (RegUPMCPC - RegUPOffer) + (EngOffer - LMP) + RegDNOffer
LSL HSL3PO Awards
RegDn Awards
RegUp awards
RRS awards
60 210 135.92 75.92 32.08 42
25 Texas Nodal
Binding Constraints protected by SPS
• OD 6/10 DAM
– Associated SPS is defined (the Austrop 345/138 kV Auto overloading for the contingency loss of the other Austrop 345/138 kV Auto)
– Defect: associated constrain was created earlier than the SPS be triggered.
• OD 5/26 – 5/28 DAM– Elkton – Athens 138 kV line overloading for the contingency loss of
Trinidad – Stryker Creek & Trinidad – Mt. Enterprise 345 kV double circuit
– Associated SPS is defined. However,– Triggered Flow > Dynamic Rating
DELIVERY_DATE DELIVERY_HOUR CONTINGENCY_NAME CONSTR_NAME LIMIT VALUE
6/10/2010 4, 6, 14, 17 XAUS58T1 AUSTRO_AT2 480 480
26 Texas Nodal
Binding Constraints protected by SPS
27 Texas Nodal
CRR Option declared to be settled in RT
• CRR option offers from NOIE to DAM– Only submitted CRR offers will be included in DAM and possibly to be
settled by RT– Not submitted CRR option will be settled by DAM LMP as all other
CRR• DAM derating testing (POD) for CRR option offers
– Before DAM run, CRR offers will be checked against Day-Ahead net work.
– The offered quantity will be reduced if the total offer is over network capability.
– Only the remaining part of CRR offers will be used by DAM– The derated part will be settled by either DAM or RT based on the
LMP and offered price (protocol section 4.6)
…(next page)
28 Texas Nodal
CRR Option declared to be settled in RT
• DAM will reserve the transmission capacity for non-cleared CRR offers– To a constraint the impact will be,
(OfferedMW – ClearedMW ) * max[0, (SourceSF - SinkSF) ]– The clearing price of a CRR offer will be,
∑ max[0, (SourceSF cons i – SinkSF cons i) ] * ShadowPrice cons i • The CRR offer clearing price >= LMP difference between source
and sink– The LMP difference will be,
LMP sink – LMP source
= (λ -∑SinkSF cons I *ShadowPrice cons i) – (λ - ∑SourceSF cons i * ShadowPrice cons i)
=∑ (SourceSF cons i – SinkSF cons i) * ShadowPrice cons i
29 Texas Nodal
30 Texas Nodal
Entended Q&A
Q&A
top related