2009 mcas analysis & adequate yearly progress report mendon – upton regional school district
Post on 29-Dec-2015
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
2009 MCAS Analysis & Adequate Yearly Progress Report
Mendon – Upton Regional School District
What is MCAS?
It is the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
Provides scores on individual students to show their progress in learning
Provides a measure of basic achievement for high school graduation
Measures performance of schools and districts to show student progress towards 100% proficiency by 2014
Who is tested in what?
Grade 3 English Language Arts (ELA) & Math Grade 4 ELA & Math Grade 5 ELA, Math, & Science Grade 6 ELA & Math Grade 7 ELA & Math Grade 8 ELA, Math, & Science Grade 10 ELA, Math, & Biology (Nipmuc’s
choice for science)
How are MCAS scores reported?
Grades 4-10Advanced: Scaled scores 260-280Proficient: 240-258Needs Improvement: 220-238Warning/Failing: 200-218
Who is Affected by AYP?
All schools and student groups are required to make AYP.
All school is called the Aggregate Student groups:
Special Education Limited English Proficient Low Income Racial backgrounds
Terms Defined AYP = Adequate Yearly Progress
A + (B or C) + D = AYP, where
A is Participation - MURSD always meets expectation
B is Performance
C is ImprovementD is Attendance - MURSD always meets expectation
Aggregate = All students in a grade level or in a district
Subgroup = A cohort of students falling in a defined category, i.e. Special Education, Low Income
B and/or C cause MURSD to not make AYP
AYP Status Categories
Year AYP Status1st Year No Status---Memorial School
2nd Year Improvement Year 1
3rd Year Improvement Year 2
4th Year Corrective Action---Miscoe Hill
5th Year Restructuring Year 1
6th Year Restructuring Year 2+
2009 Accountability Results AYP Statewide Results
54% of Elementary School in Massachusetts did not make AYP
51% of Schools not making AYP in Elementary were in non-urban areas
80% of Middle Schools did not make AYP 37% of High Schools did not make AYP
WHY Clough and Not Memorial
Memorial did not meet AYP but their target was higher than Clough’s due to 2008 scores
Memorial 2008 ELA score was 92.8 and went down to 87.9
Clough 2008 ELA score was 86.1 and remained 86.1
Clough School
Adequate Yearly Progress HistoryStatus
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
ELAAggregate N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
StatusAll
subgroups N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Math Aggregate N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes No Status
All subgroups N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes
Clough School AYP Data
Aggregate
(B) Performance (C) Improvement
Did students meet or exceed state performance target?
Did student group meet or exceed its own improvement target?
Met AYP in 2009
Met Target (90.2)
Actual Score in 2009
2008 CPI (Baseline)
Gain Target
On Target Range
Met Target
ELA No 86.1 86.1 2.3 86.1-90.9
Yes Yes
Met Target (84.3)
Actual Score in 2009
2008 CPI (Baseline)
Gain Target
On Target Range
Met Target
Math Yes 84.9 86.1 2.3 86.1-90.9
No Yes
Memorial School
Adequate Yearly Progress HistoryStatus
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
ELAAggregate N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
StatusAll
subgroups N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Math Aggregate N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes No Status
All subgroups N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes
Memorial School AYP Data
Aggregate
(B) Performance (C) Improvement
Did students meet or exceed state performance target?
Did student group meet or exceed its own improvement target?
Met AYP in 2009
Met Target (90.2)
Actual Score in 2009
2008 CPI (Baseline)
Gain Target
On Target Range
Met Target
ELA No 87.9 92.8 1.2 92.8-96.5
No No
Met Target (84.3)
Actual Score in 2009
2008 CPI (Baseline)
Gain Target
On Target Range
Met Target
Math Yes 85.3 90.1 1.7 90.1-94.3
No Yes
Miscoe Hill School AYP Data
Aggregate
(B) Performance (C) Improvement
Did students meet or exceed state performance target?
Did student group meet or exceed its own improvement target?
Met AYP in 2009
ELA Met Target (90.2)
Actual Score in 2009
2008 CPI (Baseline)
Gain Target
On Target Range
Met Target
Aggregate Yes 94.0 90.1 1.7 90.1-94.3 Yes Yes Special Education Subgroup
No 80.7 69.3 5.1 71.9-76.9 Yes Yes
Math Met Target (84.3)
Actual Score in 2009
2008 CPI (Baseline)
Gain Target
On Target Range
Met Target
Aggregate No 82.2 80.2 3.3 81.0-86.0 Yes YesSpecial Education Subgroup
No 58.1 53.8 7.7 59.0-64.0 No No
Why Miscoe did not make AYP
Miscoe did not make AYP in the Math Special Education Subgroup
Although a gain of 4.3 percentage points were realized in the special education subgroup, a gain of 7.7 was actually needed to make AYP
AYP was missed by .9
Grade 3 English
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
AboveProficient
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
71%
66%
70%
75%
69%
Grade 3 Mathematics
05
101520253035404550
2006 2007 2008 2009
AboveProficient
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
51%
61%
72%68%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
48%51%
71%
55%
62%
Grade 4 Mathematics
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
28%32%
49% 49%
55%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
70%72% 71%
74%
Grade 5 Mathematics
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
41%
52%
59%61%
Grade 5 Science/Tech Eng
05
101520253035404550
2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
53%
59%
53%
59%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
79%77%
83% 83%
Grade 6 Mathematics
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
58%
46%
58% 57%
68%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined83%
74%
81% 81%79%
Grade 7 Mathematics
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
45%
51%50%
53%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined90%
85%89% 90%
Grade 8 Mathematics
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
53% 53%56%
61%58%
Grade 8 Science/Tech Eng
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
36%
45%
63%57%
Grade 10 English Language Arts
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Failing
82%
91% 91%89%
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
93%
Grade 10 Mathematics
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Failing
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
74%
82%
92%
87% 86%
Grade 10 Biology
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2007 2008 2009
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Failing
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
67%
82%
87%
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
16%12%
53%
45%
28%33%
3%
10%
Above Proficient Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 3 – English Language Arts
(Percent scoring in each category)
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
22%20%
46%
40%
25%25%
7%
15%
Above Proficient Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 3 – Mathematics
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
10%11%
52%
42%
33%35%
5%11%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 4 – English Language Arts
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
14%16%
41%
32%
38%41%
7%11%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 4 – Mathematics
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
18%15%
56%
48%
24%29%
2%8%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 5 – English Language Arts
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
17%22%
44%
32% 32%29%
7%
18%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 5 – Mathematics
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
19%17%
40%
32%
38%39%
4%
12%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 5 – Science/Tech Eng
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
22%16%
61%
50%
15%
24%
2%9%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 6 – English Language Arts
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
28%24%
40%
33%
25%27%
8%
16%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 6 – Mathematics
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
9%14%
70%
56%
18%23%
3%7%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 7 – English Language Arts
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
15%16%
38%
33%
39%
30%
8%
21%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 7 – Mathematics
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
12%15%
78%
63%
8%15%
2%6%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 8 – English Language Arts
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
16%20%
42%
28% 30%28%
11%
23%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 8 - Mathematics
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
4% 4%
53%
35% 35%40%
9%
21%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 8 – Science/Tech Eng
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
46%
29%
47%52%
4%
15%
2% 4%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 10 – English Language Arts
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
67%
47%
19%
28%
9%
18%
5% 8%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 10 – Mathematics
Mendon-Upton vs. State Average
32%
12%
52%46%
12%
26%
3%
16%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Failing
Mendon - Upton
State
Grade 10 – Biology
Class of 2013 ELA & MathFreshman Class
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Gr 5ELA
Gr 6ELA
Gr 7ELA
Gr 8ELA
Gr 5Math
Gr 6Math
Gr 7Math
Gr 8Math
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
70%78%
81%
58%
40%
60%
50%
90%
Class of 2012 ELA & MathSophomore Class
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Gr 4ELA
Gr 6ELA
Gr 7ELA
Gr 8ELA
Gr 4Math
Gr 6Math
Gr 7Math
Gr 8Math
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
67%
78%
82%
89%
49%46%
50%
63%
Class of 2011 ELA & MathJunior Class
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Gr 6ELA
Gr 7ELA
Gr 8ELA
Gr 10ELA
Gr 6Math
Gr 7Math
Gr 8Math
Gr 10Math
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Warning
58%
74%
84%
93%
58%
45%
56%
86%
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
Class of 2010 ELA & MathSenior Class
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Gr 4ELA
Gr 8ELA
Gr 10ELA
Gr 4Math
Gr 6Math
Gr 8Math
Gr 10Math
Advanced
Proficient
NeedsImprovement
Failing
% Indicates Advanced & Proficient Combined
64%
90%89%
87%
44%
64%
53%
10th Grade MCAS RankingELANipmuc 10th grade students ranked #59 in the state of Massachusetts on the ELA portion of the MCAS test out of 282 High Schools
MathNipmuc 10th grade students ranked #84 in the state of Massachusetts on the math portion of the MCAS test out of 282 High Schools
ScienceNipmuc 10th grade students ranked #42 in the state of Massachusetts on the Biology portion of the MCAS test out of 282 High Schools
National Assessment of Educational Progress in Math - NAEP
Grade 4 Grade 82005 Massachusetts ranked #12007 Massachusetts ranked #12009 Massachusetts ranked #1
2005 Massachusetts ranked #12007 Massachusetts ranked #12009 Massachusetts ranked #1
NAEP is a national mathematics test given to fourth and eighth grade level students every two years in each of the 50 states.
How Massachusetts 4th Grade Students Scored in World’s Top Ten
TIMSS Grade 4 Math 2007
TIMSS Grade 4 Science 2007
Nation Rank Nation Rank
Hong Kong SAR 1 Singapore 1
Singapore 2 Massachusetts, USA 2
Chinese Taipei 3 Chinese Taipei 3
Massachusetts, USA 4 Hong Kong SAR 4
Japan 5 Minnesota, USA 5
Minnesota, USA 6 Japan 6
Kazakhstan 7 Russian Federation 7
USA 13 USA 10
How Massachusetts 8th Grade Students Scored in World’s Top Ten
TIMSS Grade 8 Math 2007
TIMSS Grade 8 Science 2007
Nation Rank Nation Rank
Chinese Taipei 1 Singapore 1
Korea, Rep. of 2 Chinese Taipei 2
Singapore 3 Massachusetts, USA 3
Hong Kong SAR 4 Japan 4
Japan 5 Korea, Rep. of 5
Massachusetts, USA 6 England 6
Minnesota, USA 7 Minnesota, USA 9
USA 11 USA 13
top related