2013 state of mobility survey
Post on 15-Nov-2014
4.275 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
STATE OF MOBILITY SURVEYGlobal Results
2013
METHODOLOGY
ReRez surveyed 3,236 global organizationsacross 29 countries
North America (2 countries)United States Canada
Latin America (9 countries)Mexico Brazil OLAM
EMEA (5 countries)United Kingdom Germany France Italy South Africa
APJ (13 countries)
China Japan Australia/New Zealand India Singapore South Korea Hong Kong Malaysia Taiwan Thailand Philippines Indonesia
INNOVATORS VERSUS TRADITIONALS
Welcome changeView change as opportunityEarly adopters of new technologyProactive (create change)Innovative (change to create opportunity)
Innovator OrganizationsOnly change after studying the issueView change as riskLate adopters of new technologyReactive (react to change if necessary)Employ time-honored practices
Traditional Organizations
KEY FINDINGS
1. Innovators have different attitudes about mobility
2. Mobility is more prevalent in Innovators
3. Mobility policy and management more evolved in Innovators
4. Innovators experience more mobility costs
5. Innovators experience more mobility benefits
INNOVATORS HAVE DIFFERENT ATTITUDES ABOUT MOBILITY
Innovators motivated to pursue mobility by business drivers84% of Innovators consider important (higher than any other driver)
Traditionals motivated by end user demand51% of Traditionals consider important (higher than any other driver)
Innovators say mobility risk worth the opportunity (Traditionals don’t agree)
MOBILITY MORE PREVALENT IN INNOVATORS
Significantly more employees using smartphones
55% of Innovators’ vs. 44% of Traditionals’ employee phones purchased by company
More likely to use business apps on mobile devices
83% of Innovators discussing private app store for business-related mobility apps, vs. 55% of Traditionals
What percentage of your employees currently use one of the following classes of smartphone for business? (means shown)
More likely to have a mobility policy
More likely to manage employees’ devices
More aggressive in enforcing policy (use technology instead of manual) 60% Innovators vs. 33% Traditionals
More likely to adopt mobility information protection measures
More likely to adopt mobility management measures
MOBILITY MANAGEMENT MORE EVOLVED IN INNOVATORS
Have a policy on mobile devices for business use
INNOVATORS EXPERIENCE MORE MOBILITY COSTS
Which losses have you incurred due to mobility during the past 12 months?
More mobility incidentsTraditionals—Median of 12 mobility incidents last yearInnovators—Median of 25 mobility incidents last yearMore losses due to mobility incidents
INNOVATORS EXPERIENCING LARGER MOBILITY BENEFITS
Employee benefits:Employee productivity, effectiveness, efficiency, speed and agility
Company Benefits:Brand impact, happier customers, better/faster decisions, more competitive
HR benefits:retention, recruiting, happier employees
Higher revenue growth:44% Innovators vs. 30% Traditionals
Higher profit growth:34% Innovators vs. 23% Traditionals
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Being cautious about mobility is okay. Being resistant is not. Start embracing it.
2. Start with the apps with greatest productivity benefits for employees.
3. Learn from the innovators – get the benefits while minimizing the risks.
top related