· 2019-12-11 · acknowledgments the staff from the host mills were instrumental in assisting...
Post on 07-Jul-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
N A T I O N A L C O U N C I L F O R A I R A N D S T R E A M I M P R O V E M E N T
LONG-TERM RECEIVING WATER STUDYDATA COMPENDIUM:
SEPTEMBER 2000 TO AUGUST 2001
TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 868
SEPTEMBER 2003
byRenee Ragsdale
Jill ThomasNCASI Northwest Aquatic Biology Facility
Anacortes, Washington
Acknowledgments
The staff from the host mills were instrumental in assisting with logistics and, at some sites, sample collection:Doug Brodhecker, Terry Becker, Jeff Hammond and Skip Missimer of P. H. Glatfelter, Spring Grove,Pennsylvania; Melody Sydow of Weyerhaeuser, Springfield, Oregon; Steve Moon and Barry Firth ofWeyerhaeuser, Federal Way, Washington; Toby Pierce-Smith, Joni Hegney and Bill Dameworth of Pope andTalbot, Halsey, Oregon; Brent Walley and Acker Smith of Georgia-Pacific, New Augusta, Mississippi. The fishsampling plan for Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River was designed and carried out byWestern Washington University (WWU), Bellingham, Washington, as part of a three-year research agreement.We would like to thank Dr. Leo Bodensteiner, Todd Dielman, and Jill Thomas of WWU. In particular, fishsampling on the Leaf River was done with the assistance of Dr. Fred Howell of the University of SouthernMississippi (USM); Walter (Bubba) Hubbard, David Robinson, Barry Pessoney, and Stan Crider from theMississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks; and Dr. Todd Slack with the Mississippi Museum ofNatural Science. Monthly water quality samples on the Leaf River were collected by Dr. Fred Howell of USM.Assistance from Corvallis High School students was coordinated and supervised by Betsy Berg. The boat usedfor periphyton and invertebrate sampling in Oregon was driven by Cecil Saxon. Joan Ikoma, Bill Arthurs, DanMcGarvey, and Rick Haley of the NCASI staff in Anacortes carried out all other field activities and the analysisof samples in the Northwest Aquatic Biology Facility (NABF) laboratory. Nikki Frum, Tim Peterson, andDiana Cook from the NCASI West Coast Regional Center in Corvallis, Oregon, assisted with field andanalytical activities at the WCRC. Bill Streblow and Ray Philbeck of NCASI Southern Aquatic Biology Facilityin New Bern, North Carolina, performed the effluent bioassays. We would like to thank the Scientific AdvisoryPanel for their oversight of the LTRWS: Dr. Thomas Deardorff, International Paper; Mr. Barry Firth,Weyerhaeuser Company; Dr. Wayne Landis, WWU; Dr. Wayne Minshall, Idaho State University; Mr. TiborKovacs, Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada; and Dr. John Rodgers of Clemson University. This reportwas prepared and written by Renee Ragsdale, with the assistance of Jill Thomas, both of NCASI NABF. CindyAyers assisted with document formatting and editing. Project oversight was provided by Judy Dudley, formerNCASI Senior Research Biologist, and Tim Hall, Aquatic Biology Program Manager at the NCASI NABF.
For more information about this research, contact:
Timothy J. HallAquatic Biology Program ManagerNCASIP.O. Box 1259Anacortes, WA 98221(360) 293-4748thall@ncasi.org
Robert P. Fisher, Ph.D.Vice President, Biological and Chemical AssessmentNCASIP.O. Box 13318Research Triangle Park, NC 27709(919) 941-6409rfisher@ncasi.org
For information about NCASI publications, contact:
Publications CoordinatorNCASIP.O. Box 13318Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3318(919) 941-6400publications@ncasi.org
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI). 2003. Long-term Receiving Water Study datacompendium: September 2000 to August 2001. Technical Bulletin 868. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: NationalCouncil for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.
© 2003 by the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
s e r v i n g t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l r e s e a r c h n e e d s o f t h e f o r e s t p r o d u c t s i n d u s t r y s i n c e 1 9 4 3
PRESIDENT’S NOTE
In 1998, NCASI implemented a full range of sampling and data collection as part of the Long-TermReceiving Water Studies (LTRWS) at three different receiving waters: Codorus Creek in southcentral Pennsylvania, and the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers in western Oregon. In 1999, afourth river was added, the Leaf River in south central Mississippi. The objectives of this on-going10- to 20-year study are a) to provide to the industry short-term and long-term information as towhether there are differences in aquatic communities upstream/downstream from representative pointsource effluent discharges from pulp and paper mills; and b) to determine the significance of anydifferences. The practical applications within this broad objective include creating a data base thatdemonstrates the natural temporal and spatial variability of abiotic and biotic properties of the studystreams; studying the margin of safety for effluent addition to the stream; identifying changingreceiving water conditions that might arise following possible future changes in mill processes oreffluent treatment; and providing an early indication of possible subtle effluent effects that mightnot otherwise be known. To accomplish these goals, the LTRWS created an experimental designthat included a flexible monitoring and data collection program. Because it characterizes theaquatic communities and the river waters at multiple sites along an upstream/downstream stretchof each river, as well as the mill effluent, the experimental design provides for a comprehensiverepresentation of the receiving waters.
This report is the third annual summary of the monitoring parameters for the four LTRWS rivers,covering the study year from September 2000 to August 2001. Note that in most cases thesesummaries are not the detailed data sets, but rather graphs and tables that present an overviewof the third study year data. Also included are maps, photographs, and descriptions of eachmonitoring location to illustrate the sampling plan. As demonstrated in the following pages,these summaries present a systematic picture of the extent and coverage of the data collection.
Additional reports will be issued over the course of the study. These will include the series ofannual data summaries for each water year in the study, as well as reports specifically directedat the analysis and interpretation of the LTRWS database to address effluent effects questionsidentified in the goals of the study.
Ronald A. Yeske
September 2003
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
a u s e r v i c e d e l a r e c h e r c h e e n v i r o n n e m e n t a l e p o u r l ’ i n d u s t r i e f o r e s t i è r e d e p u i s 1 9 4 3
MOT DU PRÉSIDENT
En 1998, NCASI a réalisé un large éventail d’échantillonnage et de collecte de données dans lecadre des études à long terme des cours d’eau récepteurs (Long-Term Receiving Water Studies,LTRWS) et ce, pour trois cours d’eau récepteurs différents: Codorus Creek dans le centre Sud de laPennsylvanie de même que les rivières McKenzie et Willamette dans l’Ouest de l’Oregon. Unequatrième rivière a été ajoutée en 1999, la rivière Leaf dans le centre Sud du Mississippi. Lesobjectifs de cette étude qui se déroule en continu sur une période de 10 à 20 ans sont 1) fournir àl’industrie des informations à court terme et à long terme sur toute différence dans les milieuxaquatiques entre l’amont et l’aval d’émissaires représentatifs de fabriques de pâtes et papiers et2) s’il y a des différences, déterminer si elles sont significatives. De ces larges objectifs découlentcertaines applications pratiques dont la création d’une base de données qui permet de démontrerla variabilité temporelle et spatiale des propriétés abiotiques et biotiques des cours d’eau à l’étude;l’étude des marges de sécurité relatives à l’ajout d’un effluent dans un cours d’eau ; l’identificationde changements des conditions des eaux réceptrices qui peuvent survenir suite à des modificationséventuelles des procédés ou du traitement des effluents des fabriques et la possibilité de fournir unepremière indication quant aux impacts subtils des effluents sur le cours d’eau, impacts qui autrementpasseraient inaperçus. Afin d’atteindre ces objectifs la LTRWS a créé un design expérimental danslequel on retrouve un programme flexible de surveillance et de collecte de données. En effectuantla caractérisation des milieux aquatiques et des rivières en différents endroits selon des tronçonsamont/aval pour chaque rivière de même que la caractérisation des effluents des fabriques, le designexpérimental procure une représentation complète des eaux réceptrices.
Ce rapport est le troisième d’une série de synthèses annuelles de surveillance des paramètres desquatre rivières à l’étude par LTRWS et couvre la période allant de septembre 2000 à août 2001.Mentionnons que dans la plupart des cas, les données détaillées ne sont pas présentées mais onmontre plutôt les graphiques et tableaux qui illustrent les résultats de la troisième année de collectede données. Les cartes, photos et descriptions de chaque site de surveillance sont également inclusesafin d’illustrer le programme d’échantillonnage. Dans les pages suivantes, le lecteur trouvera lesdonnées synthèses qui lui procureront une représentation systématique de l’étendue et du champcouvert par la collecte de données.
Des rapports additionnels seront publiés tout au long de l’étude. Ces rapports incluront des séries desynthèses annuelles pour chaque année de l’étude, de même que des analyses et des interprétations dela base de données de la LTRWS afin de répondre aux questions soulevées dans les objectifs de cetteétude quant aux impacts des effluents.
Ronald A. Yeske
Septembre 2003
LONG-TERM RECEIVING WATER STUDY DATA COMPENDIUM: SEPTEMBER 2000 TO AUGUST 2001
TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 868 SEPTEMBER 2003
ABSTRACT
The NCASI Long-Term Receiving Water Study (LTRWS), begun in 1998, is a 10- to 20-year project involving four different U.S. receiving waters: Codorus Creek in Pennsylvania; the Leaf River in Mississippi; the McKenzie River in Oregon; and the Willamette River in Oregon. The LTRWS objectives are to evaluate possible differences in the aquatic community upstream/downstream of representative point source effluent discharges from pulp and paper mills. The experimental design includes multiple sampling sites and variables for each of the receiving waters in the study. The measured components include water and effluent chemistry, characterization of the effluents with chronic bioassays, river temperature and flow, solar radiation, and detailed measurements of the periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish communities. This report is the third annual overview of the monitoring study, covering the period from September 2000 to August 2001. The monitoring at Codorus Creek during this period included four sampling dates at eight sampling sites for biotic community data, 11 sampling dates at six sites for water quality data, and two sampling dates for mill effluent. Among the aquatic community findings for Codorus Creek were four divisions of periphyton, 210 macroinvertebrate taxa (an increase of 11% over the previous year), and 41 fish taxa (a 14% increase over the previous year). This was the first full year of monitoring for the Leaf River, with two sampling dates at six sampling sites for biotic community data, 11 sampling dates along six sites for water quality data, and nine sampling dates for mill effluent. Among the aquatic community findings for the Leaf were three to four divisions of periphyton on artificial and natural substrate, 76 macroinvertebrate taxa (a 9% increase over the previous year), 29 fish taxa using boat electrofishing gear (a decrease of 6% from the second study year) and 14 fish taxa using backpack electrofishing gear. The McKenzie River data included four sampling dates at six sampling sites for biotic community data, 11 sampling dates along five sites for water quality data, and four sampling dates for mill effluent. Among the McKenzie aquatic community findings were four divisions of periphyton, 244 macroinvertebrate taxa (a 14% increase from the previous study year), eight fish taxa using boat electrofishing gear (a decrease of 50% from the previous year) and 13 fish taxa using backpack electrofishing gear. The Willamette River included four sampling dates at six sampling sites for biotic community data, 11 sampling dates along five sites for water quality data, and three sampling dates for mill effluent. Among the findings for the Willamette aquatic communities were three divisions of periphyton, 261 macroinvertebrate taxa (a 45% increase over the previous study year), 14 fish taxa using boat electrofishing gear (a 26% decrease from the second study year) and 20 fish taxa using backpack electrofishing gear. Additional reports directed at the interpretation of the data with respect to addressing effluent effects questions identified in the study objectives, will be issued over the course of the study.
KEYWORDS
data summary, long-term receiving water study
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
RELATED NCASI PUBLICATIONS
Technical Bulletin No. 867 (August 2003). Integration of a relative risk multi-stressor risk assessment with the NCASI long-term receiving water studies to assess effluent effects at the watershed level, Leaf River, Mississippi.
Technical Bulletin No. 856 (January 2003). Long-term receiving water study data compendium: September 1999 to August 2000.
Technical Bulletin No. 846 (May 2002). Turbidity: A literature review on the biological effects of turbidity on aquatic organisms and an assessment of turbidity in two long-term receiving water study rivers in Oregon.
Technical Bulletin No. 843 (May 2002). Long-term receiving water study data compendium: August 1998 to September 1999.
Technical Bulletin No. 842 (February 2002). Integrated long-term receiving water studies: site selection process and a description of the selected study sites.
Technical Bulletin No. 841 (February 2002). A compendium of field methods used in NCASI long-term receiving water studies.
Technical Bulletin No. 833 (September 2001). Evaluation of nutrient criteria and response variables based upon the NCASI long-term receiving water study experience.
Technical Bulletin No. 829 (July 2001). The effects of a bleached kraft mill effluent on periphyton and macroinvertebrates in streamside mesocosm studies.
Technical Bulletin No. 828 (July 2001). The effects of an unbleached kraft mill effluent on periphyton and macroinvertebrates in streamside mesocosm studies.
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
COMPENDIUM DES DONNEES - ETUDES A LONG TERME DES COURS D’EAURECEPTEURS : SEPTEMBRE 2000 A AOUT 2001
BULLETIN TECHNIQUE NO. 868SEPTEMBRE 2003
RESUME
L’étude à long terme des cours d’eau récepteurs (LTRWS) de NCASI est un projet qui a démarréen 1998. Cette étude s’échelonne sur une période de 10 à 20 ans et implique quatre cours d’eaurécepteurs des États-Unis: Codorus Creek, Pennsylvanie; la rivière Leaf, Mississippi; la rivièreMcKenzie, Oregon et la rivière Willamette, Oregon. Les objectifs de la LTRWS sont d’évaluer lesdifférences possibles dans le milieu aquatique entre l’amont et l’aval d’émissaires représentatifs defabriques de pâtes et papiers. Le design expérimental comprend de nombreux sites d’échantillonnageet de nombreuses variables pour chaque cours d’eau récepteur à l’étude. Parmi les composantesmesurées mentionnons la chimie de l’eau et des effluents, la caractérisation des effluents à l’aidede bioessais de toxicité chronique, la température et le débit de la rivière, la radiation solaire et desmesures détaillées du périphyton, des macroinvertébrés benthiques et des communautés de poissons.Ce rapport présente la troisième revue annuelle de l’étude de surveillance, couvrant la période deseptembre 2000 à août 2001. La surveillance réalisée à Codorus Creek pendant cette périodecomprenait quatre dates d’échantillonnage pour huit sites d’échantillonnage de la communautébiotique, 11 dates d’échantillonnage pour six sites d’échantillonnage de la qualité de l’eau et deuxdates d’échantillonnage des effluents des fabriques. Parmi les résultats obtenus à Codorus Creek,mentionnons quatre divisions de périphyton, 210 taxons de macroinvertébrés (une augmentation de11% depuis l’année précédente) et 41 taxons de poissons (une augmentation de 14% depuis l’annéeprécédente). Il s’agissait de la première année complète de surveillance pour la rivière Leaf. L’étudecomprenait deux dates d’échantillonnage pour les six sites d’échantillonnage de la communautébiotique, 11 dates d’échantillonnage pour les six sites d’échantillonnage de la qualité de l’eau etneuf dates d’échantillonnage des effluents des fabriques. Parmi les résultats obtenus à la rivièreLeaf, mentionnons trois à quatre divisions de périphyton sur un substrat artificiel et naturel, 76taxons de macroinvertébrés (une augmentation de 9% depuis l’année précédente), 29 taxons depoissons en utilisant un dispositif de pêche électrique installé sur un bateau (une diminution de6% par rapport à la seconde année de l’étude) et 14 taxons de poissons en utilisant un dispositif depêche électrique portatif. En ce qui concerne la rivière McKenzie, la surveillance a été réaliséeselon quatre dates d’échantillonnage pour six sites d’échantillonnage de la communauté biotique,11 dates d’échantillonnage pour cinq sites d’échantillonnage de la qualité de l’eau et quatre datesd’échantillonnage pour les effluents de fabriques. Parmi les résultats obtenus à la rivière McKenziementionnons quatre divisions de périphyton, 244 taxons de macroinvertébrés (une augmentation de14% depuis l’année précédente), huit taxons de poissons en utilisant un dispositif de pêche électriqueinstallé sur un bateau (une diminution de 50% depuis l’année précédente) et 13 taxons de poissonsen utilisant un dispositif de pêche électrique portatif. Pour ce qui est de la rivière Willamette, lasurveillance consistait en quatre dates d’échantillonnage pour six sites d’échantillonnage de lacommunauté biotique, 11 dates d’échantillonnage pour cinq sites d’échantillonnage de la qualitéde l’eau et trois dates d’échantillonnage des effluents de fabriques. Parmi les résultats obtenus à larivière Willamette mentionnons trois divisions de périphyton, 261 taxons de macroinvertébrés (uneaugmentation de 45% depuis l’année précédente), 14 taxons de poissons en utilisant un dispositifde pêche électrique installé sur un bateau (une diminution de 26% par rapport à la seconde année del’étude) et 20 taxons de poissons en utilisant un dispositif de pêche électrique portatif. Des rapports
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
additionnels seront publiés tout au long de cette étude afin d’interpréter ces données en regarddes questions reliées aux impacts des effluents qui se trouvent dans les objectifs de l’étude.
MOTS CLES
étude à long terme des cours d’eau récepteurs, sommaire des données
AUTRES PUBLICATIONS DE NCASI DANS CE DOMAINE
Bulletin technique no. 867 (août 2003). Integration of a relative risk multi-stressor risk assessmentwith the NCASI long-term receiving water studies to assess effluent effects at the watershed level,Leaf River, Mississippi.
Bulletin technique no. 856 (janvier 2003). Long-term receiving water study data compendium:September 1999 to August 2000.
Bulletin technique no. 846 (mai 2002). Turbidity: A literature review on the biological effects ofturbidity on aquatic organisms and an assessment of turbidity in two long-term receiving water studyrivers in Oregon.
Bulletin technique no. 843 (mai 2002). Long-term receiving water study data compendium: August1998 to September 1999.
Bulletin technique no. 842 (février 2002). Integrated long-term receiving water studies: siteselection process and a description of the selected study sites.
Bulletin technique no. 841 (février 2002). A compendium of field methods used in NCASI long-termreceiving water studies.
Bulletin technique no. 833 (septembre 2001). Evaluation of nutrient criteria and response variablesbased upon the NCASI long-term receiving water study experience.
Bulletin technique no. 829 (juillet 2001). The effects of a bleached kraft mill effluent on periphytonand macroinvertebrates in streamside mesocosm studies.
Bulletin technique no. 828 (juillet 2001). The effects of an unbleached kraft mill effluent onperiphyton and macroinvertebrates in streamside mesocosm studies.
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1
2.0 APPROACH .................................................................................................................................2
2.1 Experimental Design ...........................................................................................................2
2.2 Sampling Schedule ..............................................................................................................3
2.3 Codorus Creek Sampling Area............................................................................................4
2.4 Leaf River Sampling Area.................................................................................................13
2.5 McKenzie River Sampling Area .......................................................................................21
2.6 Willamette River Sampling Area ......................................................................................28
3.0 METHODS AND RESULTS .....................................................................................................37
3.1 Water Temperature............................................................................................................37
3.2 Solar Radiation ..................................................................................................................38
3.3 Water Flow........................................................................................................................40
3.4 Water Chemistry................................................................................................................45
3.5 Effluent Chemistry ............................................................................................................66
3.6 Effluent Bioassays.............................................................................................................72
3.7 Periphyton .........................................................................................................................74
3.8 Benthic Macroinvertebrates...............................................................................................85
3.9 Fish ..................................................................................................................................118
4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................163
REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................163
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
TABLES
Table 2.1 Changes to the LTRWS Sampling, Analysis, or Data Handling for the Study Year 2000 to 2001......................................................................................2
Table 2.2 Water Quality Sampling Schedule, Study Year 2000 to 2001.........................................3
Table 2.3 Biological Sampling Schedule, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...............................................3
Table 2.4 Sampling Site Descriptions for Codorus Creek, Pennsylvania ........................................5
Table 2.5 Sampling Site Descriptions for the Leaf River ..............................................................14
Table 2.6 Sampling Site Descriptions for the McKenzie River, Oregon .......................................22
Table 2.7 Sampling Site Descriptions for the Willamette River, Oregon ......................................29
Table 3.1 Codorus Creek Water Chemistry ...................................................................................46
Table 3.2 Leaf River Water Chemistry ..........................................................................................51
Table 3.3 McKenzie River Water Chemistry .................................................................................56
Table 3.4 Willamette River Water Chemistry................................................................................61
Table 3.5 Mill Effluent Analysis for the Codorus Creek Facility Located in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania.........................................................................67
Table 3.6 Mill Effluent Analysis for the Leaf River Facility Located in New Augusta, Mississippi............................................................................67
Table 3.7 Mill Effluent Analysis for the McKenzie River Facility Located in Springfield, Oregon......................................................................................68
Table 3.8 Mill Effluent Analysis for the Willamette River Facility, Located near Halsey, Oregon.........................................................................................68
Table 3.9 Effluent IC25 (% v/v) for the LTRWS Mills .................................................................72
Table 3.10 Codorus Creek Periphyton Summary, August 2000 ......................................................74
Table 3.11 Codorus Creek Periphyton Summary, June 2001 ..........................................................76
Table 3.12 Leaf River Periphyton Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001 .........................................77
Table 3.13 McKenzie River Periphyton Summary, September 2000 ..............................................80
Table 3.14 McKenzie River Periphyton Summary, July 2001........................................................81
Table 3.15 Willamette River Periphyton Summary, September 2000 .............................................82
Table 3.16 Willamette River Periphyton Summary, July 2001 .......................................................83
Table 3.17 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...............................................................................................86
Table 3.18 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...............................................................................................90
Table 3.19 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biomass, Study Year 2000 to 2001...........91
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Table 3.20 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001.................................................. 94
Table 3.21 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site Using Natural Woody Substrate, Study Year 2000 to 2001.......................................... 96
Table 3.22 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001.................................................. 97
Table 3.23 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary Using Natural Woody Substrate, Study Year 2000 to 2001.......................................... 97
Table 3.24 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biomass Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................... 98
Table 3.25 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 101
Table 3.26 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 105
Table 3.27 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biomass, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...... 106
Table 3.28 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 109
Table 3.29 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 114
Table 3.30 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biomass, Study Year 2000 to 2001..... 115
Table 3.31 Codorus Creek: East Branch Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 119
Table 3.32 Codorus Creek: Menges Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 121
Table 3.33 Codorus Creek: USGS Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 123
Table 3.34 Codorus Creek: Martin Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 125
Table 3.35 Codorus Creek: Graybill Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 127
Table 3.36 Codorus Creek: Indian Rock Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 129
Table 3.37 Codorus Creek: Arsenal Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 131
Table 3.38 Codorus Creek: Furnace Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 133
Table 3.39 Leaf River Boat Electrofishing Data Summary for October 2000 .............................. 138
Table 3.40 Leaf River Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for October 2000 ...................... 141
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Table 3.41 McKenzie River Boat Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 .................144
Table 3.42 McKenzie River: Hendricks RM 26.5 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001 ................................................................146
Table 3.43 McKenzie River: Bellingers RM 18.5 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001 ................................................................147
Table 3.44 McKenzie River: Harvest RM 10 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................148
Table 3.45 McKenzie River: Armitage, RM 6.0 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................149
Table 3.46 Willamette River Boat Electrofishing Data Summary for Upstream Sites (Harrisburg and Cartney), September 2000 .................................................................152
Table 3.47 Willamette River Boat Electrofishing Data Summary for Downstream Sites (Sam Daws, Peoria, and Willamette Park), September 2000 .......................................153
Table 3.48 Willamette River: Whitely RM 177 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................155
Table 3.49 Willamette River: Harrisburg RM 160 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................156
Table 3.50 Willamette River: Cartney RM 156 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................157
Table 3.51 Willamette River: Intake RM 148.5 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................158
Table 3.52 Willamette River: Peoria RM 136 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................159
Table 3.53 Willamette River: Fisher Lane RM 132 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001 ................................................................160
FIGURES
Figure 2.1 Codorus Creek in the Area of the LTRWS ......................................................................4
Figure 2.2 East Branch, Codorus Creek ............................................................................................6
Figure 2.3 Menges, Codorus Creek ...................................................................................................7
Figure 2.4 USGS, Codorus Creek .....................................................................................................8
Figure 2.5 Martin, Codorus Creek.....................................................................................................9
Figure 2.6 Graybill, Codorus Creek ................................................................................................10
Figure 2.7 Arsenal, Codorus Creek .................................................................................................11
Figure 2.8 Furnace, Codorus Creek.................................................................................................12
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Figure 2.9 The Leaf River in the Area of the LTRWS ................................................................... 13
Figure 2.10 Tallahala, Leaf River ..................................................................................................... 15
Figure 2.11 New Augusta, Leaf River .............................................................................................. 16
Figure 2.12 Downstream, Leaf River................................................................................................ 17
Figure 2.13 Bogue, Leaf River.......................................................................................................... 18
Figure 2.14 Thompson, Leaf River ................................................................................................... 19
Figure 2.15 McLain, Leaf River ....................................................................................................... 20
Figure 2.16 McKenzie River in the Area of the LTRWS ................................................................. 21
Figure 2.17 Walterville RM 20.5, McKenzie River.......................................................................... 23
Figure 2.18 Bellingers RM 18.5 and across from Bellingers Boat Launch RM 19, McKenzie River............................................................................................................. 24
Figure 2.19 Mohawk RM 14, McKenzie River ................................................................................ 25
Figure 2.20 Harvest RM 10, McKenzie River .................................................................................. 26
Figure 2.21 Armitage RM 6, McKenzie River ................................................................................. 27
Figure 2.22 Willamette River in the Area of the LTRWS ................................................................ 28
Figure 2.23 Whitely RM 176, Willamette River............................................................................... 30
Figure 2.24 Harrisburg RM 160, Willamette River .......................................................................... 31
Figure 2.25 Cartney RM 156, Willamette River............................................................................... 32
Figure 2.26 Intake RM 148, Willamette River ................................................................................ 33
Figure 2.27 Snag Boat RM 143.5, Willamette River........................................................................ 34
Figure 2.28 Willamette Park RM 134, Willamette River ................................................................. 35
Figure 2.29 Corvallis RM 128, Willamette River............................................................................. 36
Figure 3.1 McKenzie River Water Temperature, 7d Moving Mean of the Maximum and 24h Fluctuation, from September 2000 to August 2001, Measured at Springfield, Oregon................................................................................... 37
Figure 3.2 Willamette River Water Temperature, 7d Moving Mean of the Maximum and the 24h Fluctuation, from September 2000 to August 2001, Measured at Halsey, Oregon ......................................................................................... 38
Figure 3.3 Daily Solar Radiation for the Codorus Creek LTRWS Area, Measured at Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, from September 2000 to August 2001............................ 39
Figure 3.4 Daily Solar Radiation for the Willamette River LTRWS area, Measured near Halsey, Oregon, from September 2000 to August 2001........................................ 39
Figure 3.5 Codorus Creek Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001.............................. 41
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Figure 3.6 Codorus Creek Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001.................41
Figure 3.7 Leaf River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001 .....................................42
Figure 3.8 Leaf River Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001.................42
Figure 3.9 McKenzie River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001............................43
Figure 3.10 McKenzie River Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001.................43
Figure 3.11 Willamette River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001...........................44
Figure 3.12 Willamette River Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001.................44
Figure 3.13 Codorus Creek pH..........................................................................................................48
Figure 3.14 Codorus Creek Temperature ..........................................................................................48
Figure 3.15 Codorus Creek Color .....................................................................................................48
Figure 3.16 Codorus Creek Conductivity..........................................................................................48
Figure 3.17 Codorus Creek Turbidity ...............................................................................................49
Figure 3.18 Codorus Creek TOC.......................................................................................................49
Figure 3.19 Codorus Creek COD ......................................................................................................49
Figure 3.20 Codorus Creek Hardness................................................................................................49
Figure 3.21 Codorus Creek Total Phosphorus...................................................................................50
Figure 3.22 Codorus Creek Total Nitrogen .......................................................................................50
Figure 3.23 Codorus Creek In Vivo Chlorophyll ..............................................................................50
Figure 3.24 Leaf River Ph .................................................................................................................53
Figure 3.25 Leaf River Temperature .................................................................................................53
Figure 3.26 Leaf River Color ............................................................................................................53
Figure 3.27 Leaf River Conductivity.................................................................................................53
Figure 3.28 Leaf River Turbidity ......................................................................................................54
Figure 3.29 Leaf River TOC..............................................................................................................54
Figure 3.30 Leaf River COD .............................................................................................................54
Figure 3.31 Leaf River Hardness.......................................................................................................54
Figure 3.32 Leaf River Total Phosphorus .........................................................................................55
Figure 3.33 Leaf River Total Nitrogen..............................................................................................55
Figure 3.34 Leaf River In Vivo Chlorophyll.....................................................................................55
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Figure 3.35 McKenzie River pH....................................................................................................... 58
Figure 3.36 McKenzie River Temperature ....................................................................................... 58
Figure 3.37 McKenzie River Color................................................................................................... 58
Figure 3.38 McKenzie River Conductivity....................................................................................... 59
Figure 3.39 McKenzie River Turbidity............................................................................................. 59
Figure 3.40 McKenzie River Hardness............................................................................................. 59
Figure 3.41 McKenzie River Total Phosphorus................................................................................ 60
Figure 3.42 McKenzie River Total Nitrogen .................................................................................... 60
Figure 3.43 McKenzie River In Vivo Chlorophyll ........................................................................... 60
Figure 3.44 Willamette River pH...................................................................................................... 63
Figure 3.45 Willamette River Temperature ...................................................................................... 63
Figure 3.46 Willamette River Color ................................................................................................. 63
Figure 3.47 Willamette River Conductivity...................................................................................... 64
Figure 3.48 Willamette River Turbidity ........................................................................................... 64
Figure 3.49 Willamette River Hardness............................................................................................ 64
Figure 3.50 Willamette River Total Phosphorus............................................................................... 65
Figure 3.51 Willamette River Total Nitrogen ................................................................................... 65
Figure 3.52 Willamette River In Vivo Chlorophyll .......................................................................... 65
Figure 3.53 Mill Effluent Color ........................................................................................................ 69
Figure 3.54 Mill Effluent Tannin/Lignin .......................................................................................... 69
Figure 3.55 Mill Effluent Conductivity ............................................................................................ 69
Figure 3.56 Mill Effluent Turbidity .................................................................................................. 69
Figure 3.57 Mill Effluent TSS .......................................................................................................... 70
Figure 3.58 Mill Effluent BOD......................................................................................................... 70
Figure 3.59 Mill Effluent COD......................................................................................................... 70
Figure 3.60 Mill Effluent TOC ......................................................................................................... 70
Figure 3.61 Mill Effluent Total Phosphorus ..................................................................................... 71
Figure 3.62 Mill Effluent Phytosterols ............................................................................................. 71
Figure 3.63 Mill Effluent Resin Acids.............................................................................................. 71
Figure 3.64 Spring Grove, PA, IC25s............................................................................................... 73
Figure 3.65 New Augusta, MS, IC25s .............................................................................................. 73
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Figure 3.66 Springfield, OR, IC25s...................................................................................................73
Figure 3.67 Halsey, OR, IC25s .........................................................................................................73
Figure 3.68 Codorus Creek Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), August 2000...............................................75
Figure 3.69 Codorus Creek Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), June 2001 ...................................................76
Figure 3.70 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using Wooden Dowels (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), October 2000 .......77
Figure 3.71 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using Sand Periphyton (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), May 2001.............78
Figure 3.72 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using Hester-Dendy Plates (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), May 2001.......79
Figure 3.73 McKenzie River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), September 2000...........................80
Figure 3.74 McKenzie River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), July 2001.....................................81
Figure 3.75 Willamette River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing <1%), September 2000............................82
Figure 3.76 Willamette River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing <1%), September 2000............................83
Figure 3.77 Mean Chlorophyll a (mg/m2) LTRWS Rivers for Study Year 2000 to 2001 ................84
Figure 3.78 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Dry Weight......................................91
Figure 3.79 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Ash-Free Dry Weight ......................91
Figure 3.80 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for Codorus Creek Sampling Sites Upstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...............................................................................................92
Figure 3.81 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for Codorus Creek Sampling Sites Downstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...............................................................................................93
Figure 3.82 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Dry Weight Using Hester-Dendy Plates ............................................................................................98
Figure 3.83 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Ash-Free Dry Weight Using Hester-Dendy Plates ............................................................................................98
Figure 3.84 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the Leaf River Sampling Sites Upstream of Mill Discharge Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ..................................................99
Figure 3.85 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the Leaf River Sampling Sites Downstream of Mill Discharge Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2000`...............................................100
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Figure 3.86 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Dry Biomass............................... 106
Figure 3.87 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Ash-Free Dry Biomass ............... 106
Figure 3.88 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the McKenzie River Sampling Sites Upstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 107
Figure 3.89 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the McKenzie River Sampling Sites Downstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 108
Figure 3.90 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Dry Biomass.............................. 115
Figure 3.91 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Ash-Free Dry Biomass .............. 115
Figure 3.92 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the Willamette River Sampling Sites Upstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 116
Figure 3.93 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the Willamette River Sampling Sites Downstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 117
Figure 3.94 Percent Fish Distribution for Upstream Sites (East Branch, Menges and USGS) Codorus Creek, August 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples ......... 135
Figure 3.95 Percent Fish Distribution for Downstream Sites (Martin, Graybill, and Indian Rock) Codorus Creek, August 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples ................................................................................................ 136
Figure 3.96 Percent Fish Distribution for Downstream Sites (Arsenal and Furnace) Codorus Creek, August 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples ......... 137
Figure 3.97 Leaf River Boat Fish Distribution for October 2000................................................... 140
Figure 3.98 Leaf River Backpack Fish Distribution for October 2000........................................... 143
Figure 3.99 McKenzie River Boat Fish Distribution for September 2000 ..................................... 145
Figure 3.100 Percent Fish Distribution for Upstream Sites (Hendricks and Bellingers) McKenzie River, September 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples ................................................................................................ 150
Figure 3.101 Percent Fish Distribution for Downstream Sites (Harvest and Armitage), McKenzie River, September 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples ................................................................................................ 151
Figure 3.102 Willamette River Boat Fish Distribution for September 2000 .................................... 154
Figure 3.103 Percent Fish Distribution for Upstream Sites (Whitely, Harrisburg, Cartney and Intake), Willamette River September 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing.............................................................................................. 161
Figure 3.104 Percent Fish Distribution for Downstream Sites (Peoria and Fisher Lane), September 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples .............................. 162
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
LONG-TERM RECEIVING WATER STUDY DATA COMPENDIUM: SEPTEMBER 2000 TO AUGUST 2001
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes the data collected during the third year (2000 to 2001) of the Long-Term Receiving Water Study (LTRWS), a 10- to 20-year NCASI project. This is the third annual summary to be issued, the first was issued in May 2002, NCASI (2002a), and the second was issued in 2003, NCASI (2003). Reports addressing study objectives will continue to be issued separately.
The LTRWS involves four different U.S. receiving waters, including Codorus Creek in Pennsylvania, the Leaf River in Mississippi, and the McKenzie and Willamette rivers in Oregon. These locations represent warm and coldwater stream types, as well as streams ranging from effluent-dominated to those more typical of industry receiving waters. Mill process types represented in the LTRWS include both bleached and unbleached kraft. Studies now underway at these locations provide an opportunity to complete before/after process change comparisons for these mills as they undergo Cluster Rule or other process or effluent treatment changes in the future. A detailed description of the site selection process for the LTRWS was presented in Hall et al. (1999) and NCASI (2002b).
The scope and framework for these studies were developed based on input from a committee of industry representatives with knowledge and skills in aquatic biology and environmental issues related to mill effluent discharges. Two broad objectives were established: a) to determine whether there were detectable differences in biological monitoring parameters upstream and downstream of mill effluent discharges, and b) to determine the significance of any differences in terms of broader river ecological functioning. Specific project goals included a) addressing temporal variability over a 10- to 20-year timeline, b) addressing spatial variability along upstream/downstream river gradients, c) identifying the margin of safety for effluent addition, d) investigating possible changes in effluent effects that might arise from mill process or effluent treatments changes, e) providing an early indication of adverse effects by carrying out a study of exceptional depth and detail, and f) providing a study template for others to use. Hall and Miner (1997) reported further details of the LTRWS scope and framework as well as other study attributes which were considered to be desirable.
To address the objectives and goals of the study, the experimental design needed to be broad, incorporating multiple spatial and temporal scales, field and laboratory assays, and biotic and abiotic components. The spatial aspect included multiple upstream/downstream sampling sites to address spatial variation, and also components to address responses on different spatial scales, from instream habitat evaluations to watershed-based risk assessments. The temporal scale was incorporated through sampling schedules to address seasonal variations and long-term annual variations. Field studies included instream or streamside monitoring of abiotic (water temperature, water flow, conductivity, and solar radiation) and biotic (periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish) components. Laboratory evaluations included water chemistry and effluent chronic bioassays. A more detailed description of the experimental design is given in NCASI (2002c).
This compendium will give a brief outline of the sampling schedule and the sampling design for each river (Section 2) including a general list of sampling sites for each LTRWS river. A short description of the field methods will be provided at the start of each section of data (Section 3). Complete descriptions of the LTRWS sites and field methods are presented in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 841 (2002c).
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 2
2.0 APPROACH
2.1 Experimental Design
The experimental design for the biotic and abiotic components of the study was originally set to maximize the ability to analyze temporal variations within and between different sets of study variables. At the onset it was recognized that flexibility would be needed to accommodate any unknown factors that might occur during such a long study (e.g., changing conditions in the field necessitating changing site locations, additions; subtractions, or modifications to field or laboratory methodologies). Changes that occurred during the 2000 to 2001 study year are described in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Changes to the LTRWS Sampling, Analysis, or Data Handling for the Study Year 2000 to 2001
Type of Change LTRWS Component Description Addition Water Chemistry In vivo chlorophyll analysis added for all rivers starting
in June 2001
Addition Water Chemistry COD analysis added for the Leaf River and Codorus Creek
Addition Water Chemistry TOC analysis added for the Leaf River and Codorus Creek
Addition Fish Leaf River backpack electrofishing annual sampling started September 2000
Modification Water Temperature From September 1, 2000 to March 15, 2001, Vemco-Minilog-T data loggers were used to collect temperature data; after March 15, 2001, Tidbit data loggers were used to collect temperature data for the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers.
Modification Periphyton Wooden dowels chlorophyll a analysis (Leaf River, September, 2000) switched to sand periphyton analysis in May 2001
Modification Macroinvertebrates and periphyton
Starting in March 2001, macroinvertebrates and periphyton were sampled across from Bellingers Boat Launch (RM 19) instead of at Bellingers (RM 18.5) on the McKenzie River.
Modification Macroinvertebrates and periphyton
From September 2000 to August 2001, macroinvertebrates and periphyton were sampled at Walterville (RM 20.5) instead of Hendricks (RM 22.4) on the McKenzie River due to low flow conditions.
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 3
2.2 Sampling Schedule
River water quality was sampled once monthly for chemical analysis at each river, except for during the month of December (Table 2.2). Biotic elements were sampled quarterly (Table 2.3) for Codorus Creek, the McKenzie River, and the Willamette River; the Leaf River was sampled once in the fall of 2000 for all biotic elements, and once in the spring of 2001 for benthic macroinvertebrates and periphyton.
Table 2.2 Water Quality Sampling Schedule, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Month Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Day(s) 25 23 27 a 29 26 26 30 21 18/20b 30 2 anot sampled for this month bCodorus Creek sampled June 20, all other rivers June 18
Table 2.3 Biological Sampling Schedule, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Season Codorus Creek Leaf River McKenzie River Willamette River Fall 2000 August 22-24 October 16-18 September 21-22 September 19-21
Winter 2000 November 14-16 December 7-8 December 5-7
Spring 2001 March 20-22 March 17-18a March 8-9 March 6-8
Summer 2001 June 12-13 July 12-13 July 10-12 a benthic macroinvertebrates and periphyton only
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 4
2.3 Codorus Creek Sampling Area
Codorus Creek is located in the County of York in south central Pennsylvania. The study area of the creek extends from just above Lake Marburg (created from the impoundment of one tributary of the West Branch of Codorus Creek) to its confluence with the Susquehanna River (Figure 2.1). There were eight sampling locations along this stretch of the creek (Table 2.4); six were sampled for all biotic and abiotic elements, one (East Branch) was sampled for biotic elements, and another (Indian Rock) for fish only. The East Branch and Indian Rock sampling was done as part of the Western Washington University Research Agreement fish experimental design. A detailed description of each site is available in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 841 (2002c) and NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 842 (2002b). Figures 2.2 through 2.8 show upstream views taken at each of the quarterly seasonal sampling events for periphyton and macroinvertebrates.
Figure 2.1 Codorus Creek in the Area of the LTRWS
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 5
Table 2.4 Sampling Site Descriptions for Codorus Creek, Pennsylvania Sample Site Site Description Sampled Elements
Oil Creek Tributary sampled upstream of the confluence with Codorus Creek
All abiotic elements No biotic
East Branch Located on the West Branch above Lake Marburg Dam All biotic elements No abiotic elements
Menges Located on the West Branch below the hypolimnetic discharge from Lake Marburg and above the mill
All biotic elements All abiotic elements
USGS Located on the West Branch below the mill thermal effluent discharge
All biotic elements All abiotic elements
Martin Located on the West Branch below the mill process water effluent discharge
All biotic elements All abiotic elements
Graybill Located on the West Branch All biotic elements All abiotic elements
Indian Rock Located on the West Branch just above the confluence with the South Branch
Fish only No abiotic elements
Arsenal Located on the main stem of Codorus Creek, in the city of York
All biotic elements All abiotic elements
Furnace Located on the main stem just above its confluence with the Susquehanna River
All biotic elements All abiotic elements
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Aug
ust 2
000
Nov
embe
r 200
0
Mar
ch 2
001
June
200
1
Figu
re 2
.2 E
ast B
ranc
h, C
odor
us C
reek
6 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
A
ugus
t 200
0
N
ovem
ber 2
000
Mar
ch 2
001
June
200
1
Figu
re 2
.3 M
enge
s, C
odor
us C
reek
Technical Bulletin No. 868 7
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
A
ugus
t 200
0
Nov
embe
r 200
0
M
arch
200
1
June
200
1
Figu
re 2
.4 U
SGS,
Cod
orus
Cre
ek
8 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Aug
ust 2
000
N
ovem
ber 2
000
Mar
ch 2
001
Ju
ne 2
001
Figu
re 2
.5 M
artin
, Cod
orus
Cre
ek
Technical Bulletin No. 868 9
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
A
ugus
t 200
0
Nov
embe
r 200
0
M
arch
200
1
June
200
1
Figu
re 2
.6 G
rayb
ill, C
odor
us C
reek
10 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Aug
ust 2
000
N
ovem
ber 2
000
M
arch
200
1
June
200
1
Figu
re 2
.7 A
rsen
al, C
odor
us C
reek
Technical Bulletin No. 868 11
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Aug
ust 2
000
N
ovem
ber 2
000
M
arch
200
1
June
200
1
Figu
re 2
.8 F
urna
ce, C
odor
us C
reek
12 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 13
2.4 Leaf River Sampling Area
The Leaf River is located in SE Mississippi, flowing in a southeasterly direction from its headwaters, joining with the Chickasawhay River to form the Pascagoula River. The LTRWS is located downstream of Hattiesburg and extends 32 river miles (RM), most of which are located in Perry County. The sampling locations begin four river miles above the paper mill discharge at New Augusta and extend downstream of the mill discharge to just below McLain (Figure 2.9). Of the 12 sampling locations along this stretch of the river (Table 2.5), six were sampled for abiotic elements; the remaining six were sampled for the biotic elements. A detailed description of each site is available in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 841 (2002c) and NCASI Technical Bulletin No 842 (2002b). Figures 2.10 through 2.15 show upstream views taken at each of the quarterly seasonal macroinvertebrate/periphyton sampling events.
Figure 2.9 The Leaf River in the Area of the LTRWS
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 14
Table 2.5 Sampling Site Descriptions for the Leaf River
Sample Site Site Description Sampled Elements
Tallahalla Creek Located on the tributary stream, upstream of its confluence with the Leaf River
Abiotic elements only
Tallahalla Located on the Leaf River upstream of the confluence with Tallahalla Creek and 4.3 RM upstream of the mill effluent discharge
Biotic elements only
Mahned Located on the Leaf River 4.7 RM upstream of the mill effluent discharge
Abiotic elements only
New Augusta Located on the Leaf River 1.5 RM upstream of the mill effluent discharge
Biotic elements only
Downstream 2 sites (A and B) located approximately 2 RM downstream of the mill effluent discharge
Biotic elements only
Wingate Located 4.4 RM downstream of the mill effluent discharge
Abiotic elements only
Bogue Located upstream of the town of Beaumont, 10.3 RM downstream of the mill effluent discharge
Biotic elements only
Beaumont Located in Beaumont, 12.2 RM downstream of the mill effluent discharge
Abiotic elements only
Thompson Located downstream of Beaumont, 13 RM downstream of the mill
Biotic elements only
McLain Bridge Located at the highway bridge, upstream of the town of McLain, 26.8 RM downstream of the mill
Abiotic elements only
McLain Located downstream of the highway bridge, 27.5 RM downstream of the mill
Biotic elements only
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Oct
ober
200
0
M
ay 2
001
Figu
re 2
.10
Tal
laha
la, L
eaf R
iver
Technical Bulletin No. 868 15
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Oct
ober
200
0
M
ay 2
001
Figu
re 2
.11
New
Aug
usta
, Lea
f Riv
er
16 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
O
ctob
er 2
001
M
ay 2
001
Figu
re 2
.12
Dow
nstre
am, L
eaf R
iver
Technical Bulletin No. 868 17
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
O
ctob
er 2
000
M
ay 2
001
Figu
re 2
.13
Bog
ue, L
eaf R
iver
18 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Oct
ober
200
0
May
200
1
Figu
re 2
.14
Tho
mps
on, L
eaf R
iver
Technical Bulletin No. 868 19
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Oct
ober
200
0
M
ay 2
001
Figu
re 2
.15
McL
ain,
Lea
f Riv
er
20 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 21
2.5 McKenzie River Sampling Area
The McKenzie River originates in the Cascade Mountains in central Oregon and runs west into the Willamette Valley where it joins the Willamette River. The study area of the river extends approximately 20 RM, from Hendricks Bridge at the upstream end to Armitage State Park at the downstream end (Figure 2.16). There are five water quality sampling locations, five benthic macroinvertebrate sampling locations, four backpack electrofishing areas, and five boat electrofishing areas (Table 2.6). A detailed description of each site is available in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 841 (2002c) and NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 842 (2002b). Figures 2.17 through 2.21 show upstream views taken at each of the quarterly seasonal macroinvertebrate/periphyton sampling events.
Figure 2.16 McKenzie River in the Area of the LTRWS
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 22
Table 2.6 Sampling Site Descriptions for the McKenzie River, Oregon
Sample Site Site Description Sampled Elements Hendricks RM 26-26.5 Fish only
Hendricks RM 22.4. Located 7.6 river miles above the mill effluent discharge
All abiotic elements onlya
Walterville RM 20.5. Alternate sample location when Hendricks can’t be reached due to low water
Macroinvertebrates and periphyton
Bellingers RM 18.5-19. Located approximately 3.5 river miles above the mill effluent discharge
All biotic elements
Hayden Located just above the mill effluent discharge Abiotic elements only
Mohawk RM 14. Located 1.1 river miles below the mill effluent discharge
All biotic elements
Harvest RM 10. Located approximately 4 river miles below the mill effluent discharge
All biotic elements All abiotic elements
Armitage/Coburg RM 6. Located 8.3 river miles below the mill effluent outfall
All biotic elements All abiotic elements
Mohawk River Tributary sampled upstream of the confluence with the McKenzie River
Abiotic elements only
a Due to low flow conditions, macroinvertebrates and periphyton were not sampled at Hendricks (RM22.4) during the 2000 to 2001 study year
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Sep
tem
ber 2
000
Dec
embe
r 200
0
M
arch
200
1
July
200
1
Figu
re 2
.17
Wal
terv
ille
RM
20.
5, M
cKen
zie
Riv
er
Technical Bulletin No. 868 23
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Sep
tem
ber 2
000
Dec
embe
r 200
0
M
arch
200
1
J
uly
2001
Figu
re 2
.18
Bel
linge
rs R
M 1
8.5
and
Acr
oss f
rom
Bel
linge
rs B
oat L
aunc
h R
M 1
9, M
cKen
zie
Riv
er
24 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Sept
embe
r 200
0
D
ecem
ber 2
000
Mar
ch 2
001
Ju
ly 2
001
Figu
re 2
.19
Moh
awk
RM
14,
McK
enzi
e R
iver
Technical Bulletin No. 868 25
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Sept
embe
r 200
0
Dec
embe
r 200
0
Mar
ch 2
001
Ju
ly 2
001
Figu
re 2
.20
Har
vest
RM
10,
McK
enzi
e R
iver
26 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
S
epte
mbe
r 200
0
Dec
embe
r 200
0
Mar
ch 2
001
Jul
y 20
01
Figu
re 2
.21
Arm
itage
RM
6, M
cKen
zie
Riv
er
Technical Bulletin No. 868 27
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 28
2.6 Willamette River Sampling Area
The Willamette River is located in the Willamette Valley, which runs between the Coastal Range and the Cascade Mountain Range in Western Oregon. The study area of the river extends from Harrisburg to Corvallis, a length of approximately 32 RM (Figure 2.22). There are five water quality sites, seven macroinvertebrate/periphyton sites, six boat electrofishing areas, and four backpack electrofishing areas (Table 2.7). While different sampling elements were of necessity collected from different regions of a sample site, if they came from the same general area, they have the same site name. A detailed description of the sites is available in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 841 (2002c) and NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 842 (2002b). Figures 2.23 through 2.29 show upstream views taken at each of the quarterly/seasonal sampling events for macroinvertebrates and periphyton.
Figure 2.22 Willamette River in the Area of the LTRWS
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 29
Table 2.7 Sampling Site Descriptions for the Willamette River, Oregon
Sample Site Site Description Sampled Elements
Whitely RM 176. Located above the confluence with the McKenzie River
Macroinvertebrates and periphyton
Harrisburg RM 160. Located below the city of Harrisburg and 14.7 river miles above the mill effluent discharge
All biotic elements All abiotic elements
Cartney RM 156. Located 12.7 river miles above the mill effluent discharge
All biotic elements All abiotic elements
Intake RM 148. Located 0.6 river miles above the mill effluent discharge
Biotic elements only
Sam Daws RM 145.5. Located 1.0 river mile below the mill effluent discharge
Fish
Snag Boat RM 143.5. Located 2.2 river miles the mill effluent discharge
Macroinvertebrates and periphyton
Peoria Located just downstream of the city of Peoria Fish and abiotic elements
Long Tom Confluence
RM 136 Fish
Willamette RM 134 Macroinvertebrates and periphyton
Fisher Lane RM 132 Fish only
Corvallis RM 128 All biotic elements All abiotic elements
Long Tom River Tributary sampled just upstream of the confluence with the Willamette River
Abiotic elements only
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Sep
tem
ber 2
000
D
ecem
ber 2
000
M
arch
200
1
July
200
1
Figu
re 2
.23
Whi
tely
RM
176
, Will
amet
te R
iver
30 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
S
epte
mbe
r 200
0
Dec
embe
r 200
0
Mar
ch 2
001
Ju
ly 2
001
Figu
re 2
.24
Har
risbu
rg R
M 1
60, W
illam
ette
Riv
er
Technical Bulletin No. 868 31
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
S
epte
mbe
r 200
0
Dec
embe
r 200
0
M
arch
200
1
Ju
ly 2
001
Figu
re 2
.25
Car
tney
RM
156
, Will
amet
te R
iver
32 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
S
epte
mbe
r 200
0
D
ecem
ber 2
000
M
arch
200
1
July
200
1
Figu
re 2
.26
Inta
ke R
M 1
48, W
illam
ette
Riv
er
Technical Bulletin No. 868 33
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
S
epte
mbe
r 200
0
D
ecem
ber 2
000
Mar
ch 2
001
July
200
1
Figu
re 2
.27
Sna
g B
oat R
M 1
43.5
, Will
amet
te R
iver
Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Se
ptem
ber 2
000
Dec
embe
r 200
0
M
arch
200
1
J
uly
2001
Figu
re 2
.28
Will
amet
te P
ark
RM
134
, Will
amet
te R
iver
Technical Bulletin No. 868 35
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Sep
tem
ber 2
000
Dec
embe
r 200
0
Mar
ch 2
001
July
200
1
Figu
re 2
.29
Cor
valli
s RM
128
, Will
amet
te R
iver
36 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 37
3.0 METHODS AND RESULTS
3.1 Water Temperature
In-river temperatures were recorded near the mill intake points for the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers. No temperature data were collected for Codorus Creek or the Leaf River. Between September 1, 2000 and March 15, 2001, Vemco-Minilog-T data loggers were used to collect temperature; after March 15, 2001 Tidbit data loggers were used. The 7d moving mean of the maximum temperature smoothes out some of the daily fluctuations and provides a picture of the mean temperature over a period of time. It was calculated by taking the mean of the 24h maximum for a 7d period encompassing the 3d prior and the 3d after each day. Daily fluctuations represent the difference between the minimum and maximum temperatures that occur during the 24h period from midnight to midnight. Gaps in both of the line segments (7d moving mean and 24h fluctuation) indicate data gaps due to loss of the data logger or loss of data in the electronic transfer. For the Willamette River, gaps in the 7d moving mean line segment are due to record low flows during the winter of 2000 to 2001, which caused the temperature data logger to be exposed to the air. These gaps show up as peaks on the 24h fluctuation line.
McKenzie River 2000 to 2001
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
Tem
pera
ture
(˚C
)
7d Moving Mean
24h Fluctuation
H2O Sampling
Biological Sampling
Figure 3.1 McKenzie River Water Temperature, 7d Moving Mean of the Maximum and 24h Fluctuation, from September 2000 to August 2001, Measured at Springfield, Oregon (LTRWS
sampling dates are indicated by symbols.)
National Council for air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 38
Willamette River 2000 to 2001
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
Tem
pera
ture
(˚C
)7d Moving Mean
24h Fluctuation
H2O Sampling
Biological Sampling
Figure 3.2 Willamette River Water Temperature, 7d Moving Mean of the Maximum and the 24h Fluctuation, from September 2000 to August 2001, Measured at Halsey, Oregon (LTRWS sampling
dates are indicated by symbols.)
3.2 Solar Radiation
Solar radiation measurements were made using LI-COR LI-200SA pyranometer sensors placed near the mill effluent discharge locations for Codorus Creek (Spring Grove, Pennsylvania) and the Willamette River (near Halsey, Oregon). The pyranometers were deployed for the entire sampling season and data were downloaded in conjunction with fieldwork. The sensors record the solar radiation between 400 nm and 1100 nm wavelength every 3h and report an integrated value (in W h m–2). The eight measurements per 24h were summed to give the total solar radiation per day. Gaps in the line segment indicate data gaps due to equipment failure or interference.
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 39
Codorus Creek 2000 to 2001
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novembe
r-00
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
W h
/m2
(24
h su
m)
H2O Sampling
Biological Sampling
Figure 3.3 Daily Solar Radiation for the Codorus Creek LTRWS Area, Measured at Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling dates are indicated by
symbols.)
Willamette River 2000 to 2001
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
W h
/m2
(24
h su
m)
H2O Sampling
Biological Sampling
Figure 3.4 Daily Solar Radiation for the Willamette River LTRWS Area, Measured near Halsey, Oregon, from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling dates are indicated by symbols.)
National Council for air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 40
3.3 Water Flow
River flow was obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) website. Reported values were daily flow in cubic feet per second (cfs) and feet above datum. The measurements for Codorus Creek were taken from USGS gauging station #01574500 at Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, located within the study area. The Leaf River measurements were recorded at USGS Gauging station #0247460 near New Augusta, Mississippi. The McKenzie River data were recorded at USGS gauging station #14162500 at Vida, Oregon, located 16 river miles (RM) upstream of the study area. The Willamette River data was recorded at USGS gauging station #14166000 at Harrisburg, Oregon, located at the most upstream point of the study area.
The McKenzie River gauging station, unlike the other three LTRWS rivers, is located outside of the LTRWS area; therefore, a modification was applied to the flow data in order to better represent flow conditions in the study area. A more detailed description of the modification is given in NCASI 2003.
Instream waste concentration was calculated as percent effluent per total river volume. The daily amount of effluent discharged from the plant in million gallons per day was converted to instream flow in cfs. The total river volume is the river flow plus the effluent discharge. The values represent the theoretical effluent concentration at the point of discharge without any consideration for jet or diffuser dynamics or mixing. Gaps in the line segments indicate loss of data due to equipment failure.
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 41
Codorus Creek 2000 to 2001
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Septembe
r-00
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decembe
r-00
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
Flow
in c
ubic
feet
per
sec
ond
(cfs
) River f low (cfs)
H2O Sampling
Biological Sampling
Figure 3.5 Codorus Creek Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling
dates are indicated by symbols.)
Codorus Creek 2000 to 2001
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
% E
fflue
nt
Figure 3.6 Codorus Creek Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total
River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001
National Council for air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 42
Leaf River 2000 to 2001
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Februa
ry-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
Flow
in c
ubic
feet
per
sec
ond
(cfs
)River f low (cfs)
H2O Sampling
Biological Sampling
Figure 3.7 Leaf River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling dates are indicated by symbols.)
Leaf River 2000 to 2001
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
% E
fflue
nt
Figure 3.8 Leaf River Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total
River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 43
McKenzie River 2000 to 2001
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
Flow
in c
ubic
feet
per
sec
onds
(cfs
)
River f low (cfs)
H2O Sampling
Biological Sampling
Figure 3.9 McKenzie River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling
dates are indicated by symbols.)
McKenzie River 2000 to 2001
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
% E
fflue
nt
Figure 3.10 McKenzie River Instream Waste Concentration at point of discharge as a percent of total
river volume, from September 2000 to August 2001
National Council for air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 44
Willamette River 2000 to 2001
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
Flow
in c
ubic
feet
per
sec
ond
(cfs
) River f low (cfs)H2O SamplingBiological Sampling
Figure 3.11 Willamette River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling
dates are indicated by symbols.)
Willamette River 2000 to 2001
0.000.050.100.150.200.250.300.350.400.450.500.550.60
Septem
ber-0
0
Octobe
r-00
Novem
ber-0
0
Decem
ber-0
0
Janu
ary-01
Febru
ary-01
March-0
1
April-0
1
May-01
June
-01
July-
01
Augus
t-01
% E
fflue
nt
Figure 3.12 Willamette River Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of
Total River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 45
3.4 Water Chemistry
River water samples were taken monthly for analysis at each LTRWS river. All sites were sampled on the same day (except in June when sampling on Codorus Creek occurred two days after the three other rivers) and in a downstream to upstream direction. Grab samples were collected 6 inches below the surface in acid-washed bottles, and shipped cold to the Northwest Aquatic Biology Facility (NABF) in Anacortes within 24 h and processed within 48 h. Most of the water quality analysis in this report was done at NABF, the exceptions were river pH and temperature, which were recorded in the field at the time of sampling, and total phosphorus and total nitrogen which were analyzed at the NCASI West Coast Regional Center (WCRC) in Corvallis, Oregon. Analyses included, but were not limited to, pH, temperature, color, conductivity, turbidity, total organic compounds (TOC), chemical oxygen demand (COD), hardness, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and in vivo chlorophyll. TOC analysis was added for the Leaf River and Codorus Creek during the 2000 to 2001 study year. In vivo chlorophyll analysis was added in June 2001 for all LTRWS rivers.
National Council for air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.1 C
odor
us C
reek
Wat
er C
hem
istry
Sta
tion
Da
tep
HT
em
p
(ºC
)C
olo
r
(Pt-
Co
un
its)
Co
nd
uct
ivity
(µ
s/cm
)T
urb
idity
(N
TU
)T
OC
(m
g/L
)C
OD
(m
g/L
) H
ard
ne
ss
(mg
/L)
To
tal
Ph
osp
ho
rus
(mg
/L)
To
tal
Nitr
og
en
(m
g/L
)M
en
ge
s9
/25
/00
7.4
13
.01
71
72
74
10
63
FQ
AF
QA
US
GS
9/2
5/0
07
.91
7.7
16
31
21
37
16
90
FQ
AF
QA
Ma
rtin
9
/25
/00
7.9
21
.51
93
10
45
11
96
82
31
FQ
AF
QA
Gra
ybill
9/2
5/0
08
.01
9.5
16
29
42
12
75
82
10
FQ
AF
QA
Fu
rna
ce9
/25
/00
8.1
18
.16
26
18
81
92
61
75
FQ
AF
QA
Oil
Cre
ek
9/2
5/0
08
.31
6.8
55
89
91
41
81
71
83
FQ
AF
QA
Me
ng
es
10
/23
/00
7.6
10
.01
01
74
68
86
1F
QA
FQ
AU
SG
S1
0/2
3/0
07
.61
3.8
16
31
91
01
41
28
9F
QA
FQ
AM
art
in
10
/23
/00
7.8
16
.41
52
11
74
92
46
41
97
FQ
AF
QA
Gra
ybill
10
/23
/00
7.9
12
.91
53
10
59
12
59
63
19
0F
QA
FQ
AF
urn
ace
10
/23
/00
7.9
12
.29
27
02
71
93
11
69
FQ
AF
QA
Oil
Cre
ek
10
/23
/00
8.1
9.9
29
98
49
19
19
19
1F
QA
FQ
A
Me
ng
es
11
/27
/00
7.6
8.3
13
17
68
11
86
40
.05
1.6
7U
SG
S1
1/2
7/0
07
.81
0.5
21
30
44
85
87
0.1
23
.00
Ma
rtin
1
1/2
7/0
07
.71
5.8
14
81
00
68
62
42
20
30
.08
2.1
6G
rayb
ill1
1/2
7/0
07
.91
2.3
10
97
72
84
93
31
61
0.0
72
.81
Fu
rna
ce1
1/2
7/0
08
.09
.27
66
20
51
72
41
54
0.1
03
.79
Oil
Cre
ek
11
/27
/00
8.0
8.3
47
47
91
02
01
21
24
0.3
45
.64
Me
ng
es
1/2
9/0
17
.10
.7N
D [
<1
0 P
t-C
o]
20
35
65
71
ND
3.6
8U
SG
S1
/29
/01
7.8
2.5
12
39
37
15
91
11
ND
4.7
7M
art
in
1/2
9/0
17
.81
1.1
12
61
11
51
02
87
32
21
0.0
34
.30
Gra
ybill
1/2
9/0
17
.97
.21
11
10
27
43
45
82
07
ND
4.3
8F
urn
ace
1/2
9/0
18
.03
.63
75
96
31
61
81
53
0.0
25
.06
Oil
Cre
ek
1/2
9/0
18
.11
.01
88
50
69
14
18
60
.07
8.0
7
Me
ng
es
2/2
6/0
17
.43
.81
32
40
87
87
0N
D4
.57
US
GS
2/2
6/0
17
.66
.61
05
13
91
81
01
20
0.1
35
.38
Ma
rtin
2
/26
/01
7.8
10
.61
09
99
01
15
71
97
0.0
54
.71
Gra
ybill
2/2
6/0
17
.81
1.0
91
84
16
45
17
80
.04
4.6
8F
urn
ace
2/2
6/0
17
.97
.34
65
68
52
02
01
44
0.0
54
.65
Oil
Cre
ek
2/2
6/0
17
.85
.01
66
76
72
01
56
0.0
85
.81
Me
ng
es
3/2
6/0
17
.34
.41
31
93
13
83
69
0.0
44
.80
US
GS
3/2
6/0
17
.87
.31
13
01
10
15
89
80
.09
4.6
9M
art
in
3/2
6/0
17
.91
1.1
76
69
48
18
39
15
40
.10
4.2
2G
rayb
ill3
/26
/01
7.8
9.7
51
58
45
20
31
14
1N
D4
.43
Fu
rna
ce3
/26
/01
7.9
7.4
36
38
76
17
71
15
0.0
34
.37
Oil
Cre
ek
3/2
6/0
17
.96
.21
54
52
61
88
13
30
.10
5.6
9
Not
e: N
D =
Non
-det
ect;
FQA
= F
aile
d qu
ality
ass
uran
ce
(Con
tinue
d on
nex
t pag
e)
46 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.1 C
ontin
ued
Sta
tion
Dat
epH
Tem
p (º
C)
Col
or
(P
t-C
o un
its)
Con
duct
ivity
(µ
s/cm
)T
urbi
dity
(N
TU
)T
OC
(m
g/L)
CO
D
(mg/
L)
Har
dnes
s (m
g/L)
Tot
al
Pho
spho
rus
(mg/
L)
Tot
al
Nitr
ogen
(m
g/L)
In V
ivo
Chl
orop
hyll
(mg/
L)M
enge
s4/
30/0
17.
511
.712
189
78
368
0.13
4.38
US
GS
4/30
/01
7.8
15.1
1634
412
1510
108
0.08
4.95
Mar
tin
4/30
/01
7.7
19.4
127
1306
725
7724
8N
D4.
32G
rayb
ill4/
30/0
17.
817
.110
110
429
1750
227
0.03
4.64
Fur
nace
4/30
/01
8.0
16.5
2850
07
1817
143
0.03
4.74
Oil
Cre
ek4/
30/0
17.
911
.815
579
1615
1015
10.
037.
70
Men
ges
5/21
/01
7.4
11.8
1615
420
910
590.
052.
46U
SG
S5/
21/0
17.
516
.622
252
4214
1086
0.11
3.26
Mar
tin
5/21
/01
7.7
19.5
123
847
4334
5018
50.
123.
07G
rayb
ill5/
21/0
17.
817
.598
844
3612
5119
60.
123.
63F
urna
ce5/
21/0
17.
915
.760
539
2229
2415
10.
094.
38O
il C
reek
5/21
/01
7.8
14.2
4056
298
1317
152
0.44
7.38
Men
ges
6/20
/01
7.5
13.6
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
171
136
956
0.05
1.63
1.23
US
GS
6/20
/01
7.8
18.8
1028
119
1510
880.
113.
211.
27M
artin
6/
20/0
17.
920
.929
690
1319
1510
00.
103.
531.
49G
rayb
ill6/
20/0
17.
921
.384
839
1114
1411
70.
103.
791.
62F
urna
ce6/
20/0
18.
124
.173
1069
108
1815
50.
324.
352.
37O
il C
reek
6/20
/01
8.1
20.9
1776
233
420
181
0.76
11.7
93.
93
Men
ges
7/30
/01
7.6
12.2
1016
36
611
66N
D1.
450.
88U
SG
S7/
30/0
17.
718
.215
271
1710
1178
0.02
2.60
2.09
Mar
tin
7/30
/01
7.8
22.0
124
833
1312
5717
4N
D2.
657.
50G
rayb
ill7/
30/0
17.
921
.311
083
111
1038
183
0.03
2.99
7.46
Fur
nace
7/30
/01
8.0
20.6
6168
69
930
180
0.05
3.97
4.21
Oil
Cre
ek7/
30/0
18.
119
.235
936
2818
197
0.38
11.1
96.
98
Men
ges
8/27
/01
7.8
12.6
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
163
52
1159
ND
1.35
0.92
US
GS
8/27
/01
7.7
21.5
1024
317
715
75N
D2.
401.
92M
artin
8/
27/0
17.
924
.814
210
4012
4075
210
0.04
2.00
7.95
Gra
ybill
8/27
/01
8.0
23.6
141
983
1228
6721
30.
032.
178.
04F
urna
ce8/
27/0
18.
223
.384
713
1115
4718
60.
233.
553.
86O
il C
reek
8/27
/01
8.2
21.3
3189
724
1820
188
0.20
11.4
04.
33
Not
e: N
D =
Non
-det
ect
Technical Bulletin No. 868 47
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
Sep-0
0Oct-
00Nov
-00 Dec
-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
pHM
enge
sUS
GS
Mar
tin
Gra
ybill
Furn
ace
Oil C
reek
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Temperature (C)
Men
ges
USG
S
Mar
tin
Gra
ybill
Furn
ace
Oil C
reek
Fi
gure
3.1
3 C
odor
us C
reek
pH
Figu
re 3
.14
Cod
orus
Cre
ek T
empe
ratu
re
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
050100
150
200
250
Sep-0
0 Oct-00
Nov-0
0 Dec-0
0 Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Color (Pt-Co units)
Men
ges
USG
S
Mar
tin
Gra
ybill
Furn
ace
Oil C
reek
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
020
040
060
080
010
0012
0014
0016
0018
00
Sep-0
0 Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Conductivity (us/cm)
Men
ges
USG
SM
artin
G
rayb
ill Fu
rnac
eO
il Cre
ek
Figu
re 3
.15
Cod
orus
Cre
ek C
olor
Figu
re 3
.16
Cod
orus
Cre
ek C
ondu
ctiv
ity
48 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
020406080100
120
140
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Feb
-01Mar-
01Apr-
01May
-01Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1 Aug-0
1
Turbidity (NTU)M
enge
sU
SG
S
Mar
tin
Gra
ybill
Furn
ace
Oil
Cre
ek
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
010203040506070
Sep-0
0Oct-
00Nov
-00Dec
-00Ja
n-01
Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01
Aug-01
TOC (mg/L)
Men
ges
US
GS
Mar
tin
Gra
ybill
Furn
ace
Oil
Cre
ek
Fig
ure
3.17
Cod
orus
Cre
ek T
urbi
dity
F
igur
e 3.
18 C
odor
us C
reek
TO
C
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
020406080100
120
Sep-0
0Oct-
00Nov
-00 Dec
-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
COD (mg/L)
Men
ges
USG
S
Mar
tin
Gra
ybill
Furn
ace
Oil C
reek
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
050100
150
200
250
300
350
Sep-0
0Oct-
00Nov
-00 Dec
-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Hardness (mg/L)
Men
ges
USG
S
Mar
tin
Gra
ybill
Furn
ace
Oil C
reek
Fi
gure
3.1
9 C
odor
us C
reek
CO
D
Figu
re 3
.20
Cod
orus
Cre
ek H
ardn
ess
Technical Bulletin No. 868 49
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
Sep-0
0Oct-
00Nov
-00 Dec
-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)M
enge
sUS
GS
Mar
tin
Gra
ybill
Furn
ace
Oil C
reek
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.0
0
12.0
0
14.0
0
Sep-0
0 Oct-00
Nov-0
0 Dec-0
0 Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Total Nitrogen (mg/L)
Men
ges
US
GS
Mar
tin
Gra
ybill
Furn
ace
Oil
Cre
ek
Figu
re 3
.21
Cod
orus
Cre
ek T
otal
Pho
spho
rus
Fi
gure
3.2
2 C
odor
us C
reek
Tot
al N
itrog
en
Co
do
rus
Cre
ek
200
0 to
200
1
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.0
0
12.0
0
Jun-
01
Jul-0
1
Aug-0
1
In Vivo Chlorophyll (mg/L)
Men
ges
US
GS
Mar
tin
Gra
ybill
Furn
ace
Oil
Cre
ek
Fi
gure
3.2
3 C
odor
us C
reek
In V
ivo
Chl
orop
hyll
50 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.2 L
eaf R
iver
Wat
er C
hem
istry
Sta
tion
Da
tep
HT
em
p
(ºC
)
Co
lor
(P
t-C
o
un
its)
Co
nd
uct
ivity
(µ
s/cm
)T
urb
idity
(N
TU
)T
OC
(m
g/L
)C
OD
(m
g/L
) H
ard
ne
ss
(mg
/L)
To
tal
Ph
osp
ho
rus
(m
g/L
)
To
tal
Nitr
og
en
(m
g/L
)
Ta
llah
ala
9
/25
/00
6.9
28
.23
01
98
49
20
14
FQ
AF
QA
Ma
hn
ed
9/2
5/0
07
.52
8.2
24
89
45
16
11
FQ
AF
QA
Ne
w A
ug
ust
a
9/2
5/0
07
.52
8.5
27
10
15
51
71
2F
QA
FQ
AW
ing
ate
9
/25
/00
7.7
29
.08
12
29
51
53
11
8F
QA
FQ
AB
ea
um
on
t 9
/25
/00
7.6
29
.26
52
42
61
43
51
8F
QA
FQ
AM
cL
ain
9/2
5/0
07
.82
9.1
60
23
46
15
31
19
FQ
AF
QA
Ta
llah
ala
1
0/2
3/0
07
.32
9.3
20
13
02
71
31
2F
QA
FQ
AM
ah
ne
d1
0/2
3/0
07
.22
8.0
19
91
56
14
13
FQ
AF
QA
Ne
w A
ug
ust
a
10
/23
/00
7.2
28
.01
78
93
51
21
4F
QA
FQ
AW
ing
ate
1
0/2
3/0
07
.62
8.0
51
31
64
13
31
20
FQ
AF
QA
Be
au
mo
nt
10
/23
/00
7.3
27
.55
23
04
41
32
72
1F
QA
FQ
AM
cL
ain
10
/23
/00
7.3
29
.04
93
03
61
22
72
2F
QA
FQ
A
Ta
llah
ala
1
1/2
7/0
07
.31
2.1
67
11
91
21
22
52
20
.46
1.1
9M
ah
ne
d1
1/2
7/0
07
.11
1.9
57
81
18
10
22
17
0.1
51
.19
Ne
w A
ug
ust
a
11
/27
/00
7.2
12
.05
88
51
81
11
81
80
.18
1.1
9W
ing
ate
1
1/2
7/0
07
.21
2.2
64
13
51
71
22
12
10
.22
1.2
6B
ea
um
on
t 1
1/2
7/0
07
.21
2.0
67
14
01
81
22
42
10
.27
1.3
3M
cL
ain
11
/27
/00
7.3
12
.16
51
42
18
14
33
21
0.3
11
.48
Ta
llah
ala
1
/29
/01
7.1
11
.95
91
03
17
10
22
25
0.1
50
.99
Ma
hn
ed
1/2
9/0
16
.91
1.7
55
78
19
81
81
90
.09
1.0
7N
ew
Au
gu
sta
1
/29
/01
6.9
11
.65
48
22
09
15
19
0.0
81
.02
Win
ga
te
1/2
9/0
17
.01
2.0
64
12
42
19
24
22
0.0
20
.96
Be
au
mo
nt
1/2
9/0
17
.01
1.8
64
12
02
01
22
62
20
.04
1.0
2M
cL
ain
1/2
9/0
17
.01
1.0
65
12
12
31
21
92
10
.04
0.9
7
Ta
llah
ala
2
/26
/01
7.0
17
.07
59
41
71
42
72
30
.09
1.0
7M
ah
ne
d2
/26
/01
6.9
17
.06
48
61
31
11
92
00
.05
1.0
4N
ew
Au
gu
sta
2
/26
/01
6.8
17
.57
68
61
61
32
62
00
.10
1.0
4W
ing
ate
2
/26
/01
7.0
17
.59
51
35
20
18
33
20
0.0
91
.05
Be
au
mo
nt
2/2
6/0
16
.91
7.0
10
21
21
28
19
34
19
0.0
41
.06
Mc
La
in2
/26
/01
6.7
17
.01
06
11
13
11
73
11
7N
D0
.99
Ta
llah
ala
3
/26
/01
7.0
16
.37
28
31
81
31
82
30
.14
0.7
0M
ah
ne
d3
/26
/01
7.0
16
.65
48
21
61
01
61
90
.07
0.7
9N
ew
Au
gu
sta
3
/26
/01
6.9
17
.45
38
31
41
01
52
00
.10
0.7
5W
ing
ate
3
/26
/01
7.0
16
.76
81
00
15
11
19
20
0.1
20
.74
Be
au
mo
nt
3/2
6/0
16
.91
6.4
62
10
21
71
32
02
00
.09
0.7
7M
cL
ain
3/2
6/0
16
.91
6.3
64
93
15
12
20
19
0.0
70
.72
N
ote:
ND
= N
on-d
etec
t; FQ
A =
Fai
led
qual
ity a
ssur
ance
(Con
tinue
d on
nex
t pag
e)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 51
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.2 C
ontin
ued
Sta
tion
Dat
epH
Tem
p (º
C)
Col
or
(Pt-C
o un
its)
Con
duct
ivity
(µ
s/cm
)Tu
rbid
ity
(NTU
)TO
C
(mg/
L)C
OD
(m
g/L)
H
ardn
ess
(mg/
L)
Tota
l P
hosp
horu
s (m
g/L)
Tota
l Nitr
ogen
(m
g/L)
In V
ivo
Chl
orop
hyll
(mg/
L)Ta
llaha
la
4/30
/01
7.1
23.3
8310
510
1113
250.
321.
32M
ahne
d4/
30/0
17.
223
.352
121
89
1222
0.07
1.00
New
Aug
usta
4/
30/0
17.
122
.759
107
99
2123
0.10
1.02
Win
gate
4/
30/0
17.
123
.251
164
811
4025
0.17
1.00
Bea
umon
t 4/
30/0
17.
222
.974
159
912
3723
ND
0.94
McL
ain
4/30
/01
7.2
22.4
7714
78
1320
230.
160.
92
Talla
hala
5/
21/0
17.
428
.751
103
69
1525
0.16
0.57
Mah
ned
5/21
/01
7.3
28.0
2910
211
715
180.
110.
73N
ew A
ugus
ta
5/21
/01
7.4
27.8
3810
710
715
200.
100.
72W
inga
te
5/21
/01
7.6
28.9
5618
711
1725
230.
130.
72B
eaum
ont
5/21
/01
7.5
27.9
5617
714
1323
230.
100.
70M
cLai
n5/
21/0
17.
527
.855
163
139
1722
0.06
0.60
Talla
hala
6/
18/0
16.
928
.311
392
1615
3424
0.20
0.90
4.95
Mah
ned
6/18
/01
6.9
28.2
8172
1514
3018
0.14
1.02
8.65
New
Aug
usta
6/
18/0
16.
928
.588
7813
1433
190.
160.
968.
17W
inga
te
6/18
/01
7.1
28.2
103
117
1416
4021
0.14
0.95
7.93
Bea
umon
t 6/
18/0
17.
027
.910
311
213
1838
210.
130.
959.
95M
cLai
n6/
18/0
16.
927
.910
110
115
1742
190.
120.
948.
59
Talla
hala
7/
30/0
17.
431
.658
111
811
2320
0.18
0.96
4.63
Mah
ned
7/30
/01
7.3
31.3
4281
104
2015
0.13
0.95
10.4
8N
ew A
ugus
ta
7/30
/01
7.3
31.0
4385
912
2116
0.09
0.93
9.66
Win
gate
7/
30/0
17.
331
.058
149
711
2518
0.07
0.96
12.5
3B
eaum
ont
7/30
/01
7.2
30.3
5913
510
920
150.
050.
846.
03M
cLai
n7/
30/0
17.
130
.347
121
81
1813
0.11
0.76
4.99
Talla
hala
8/
27/0
17.
026
.985
8613
928
210.
151.
043.
55M
ahne
d8/
27/0
16.
928
.053
103
94
2118
0.09
1.12
6.73
New
Aug
usta
8/
27/0
16.
927
.554
9811
624
190.
091.
067.
35W
inga
te
8/27
/01
7.2
28.0
9815
310
1233
200.
091.
099.
60B
eaum
ont
8/27
/01
6.9
28.2
9214
710
1124
170.
091.
035.
26M
cLai
n8/
27/0
16.
628
.110
517
69
729
170.
071.
024.
10
Not
e: N
D =
Non
-det
ect
52 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
6.4
6.6
6.8
7.0
7.2
7.4
7.6
7.8
8.0
8.2
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
pHTa
llaha
la
Mah
ned
New
Aug
usta
Win
gate
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Feb-0
1 Mar-01
Apr-01 May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01
Aug-01
Temperature (ºC)
Talla
hala
M
ahne
d
New
Aug
usta
Win
gate
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Figu
re 3
.24
Lea
f Riv
er p
H
Fi
gure
3.2
5 L
eaf R
iver
Tem
pera
ture
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
020406080100
120
140
160
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Color (Pt-Co Units)
Talla
hala
M
ahne
d
New
Aug
usta
Win
gate
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
050100
150
200
250
300
350
Sep-0
0 Oct-00
Nov-0
0 Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Conductivity (µs/cm)
Talla
hala
M
ahne
d
New
Aug
usta
Win
gate
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Figu
re 3
.26
Lea
f Riv
er C
olor
Figu
re 3
.27
Lea
f Riv
er C
ondu
ctiv
ity
Technical Bulletin No. 868 53
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
051015202530354045 Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Turbidity (NTU)Ta
llaha
la
Mah
ned
New
Aug
usta
Win
gate
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
0510152025 Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
TOC (mg/L)
Talla
hala
M
ahne
d
New
Aug
usta
Win
gate
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Figu
re 3
.28
Lea
f Riv
er T
urbi
dity
Fi
gure
3.2
9 L
eaf R
iver
TO
C
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
5101520253035404550 Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
COD (mg/L)
Talla
hala
M
ahne
d
New
Aug
usta
Win
gate
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
5101520253035 Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Hardness (mg/L)
Talla
hala
M
ahne
d Ne
w A
ugus
taW
inga
te
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Figu
re 3
.30
Lea
f Riv
er C
OD
Fi
gure
3.3
1 L
eaf R
iver
Har
dnes
s
54 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50 Sep
-00Oct-
00Nov
-00Dec
-00Ja
n-01 Feb
-01Mar-
01Apr-
01May
-01Ju
n-01 Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)
Talla
hala
M
ahne
d Ne
w A
ugus
taW
inga
te
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80 Sep
-00Oct-
00Nov
-00Dec
-00Ja
n-01 Feb
-01Mar-
01Apr-
01May
-01Ju
n-01 Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Total Nitrogen (mg/L)
Talla
hala
M
ahne
d
New
Aug
usta
Win
gate
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Figu
re 3
.32
Lea
f Riv
er T
otal
Pho
spho
rus
Fi
gure
3.3
3 L
eaf R
iver
Tot
al N
itrog
en
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
0.00
3.00
6.00
9.00
12.0
0
15.0
0
18.0
0
Jun-0
1
Jul-0
1
Aug-0
1In Vivo Chlorophyll (mg/L)
Talla
hala
M
ahne
d
New
Aug
usta
Win
gate
Beau
mon
t M
cLai
n
Figu
re 3
.34
Lea
f Riv
er In
Viv
o C
hlor
ophy
ll
Technical Bulletin No. 868 55
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.3 M
cKen
zie
Riv
er W
ater
Che
mis
try
Sta
tion
Dat
epH
Tem
p (º
C)
Col
or
(P
t-C
o un
its)
Con
duct
ivity
(µ
s/cm
)T
urbi
dity
(N
TU
)H
ardn
ess
(mg/
L)
Tot
al
Pho
spho
rus
(mg/
L)
Tot
al
Nitr
ogen
(m
g/L)
Hen
dric
ks
9/25
/00
7.5
11.0
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
541
16F
QA
FQ
AH
ayde
n B
ridge
9/25
/00
7.6
10.5
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
531
17F
QA
FQ
AH
arve
st
9/25
/00
7.7
10.0
1065
218
FQ
AF
QA
Arm
itage
(C
obur
g)9/
25/0
07.
510
.010
643
18F
QA
FQ
AM
ohaw
k R
iver
9/25
/00
7.6
14.0
2170
425
FQ
AF
QA
Hen
dric
ks10
/23/
007.
310
.0N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]57
217
FQ
AF
QA
Hay
den
Brid
ge10
/23/
007.
69.
011
562
17F
QA
FQ
AH
arve
st10
/23/
007.
39.
016
662
18F
QA
FQ
AA
rmita
ge (
Cob
urg)
10/2
3/00
7.5
9.0
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
642
18F
QA
FQ
AM
ohaw
k R
iver
10/2
3/00
7.3
9.0
3161
522
FQ
AF
QA
Hen
dric
ks11
/27/
007.
38.
0N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]58
117
0.07
0.06
Hay
den
Brid
ge11
/27/
007.
57.
5N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]59
118
0.07
0.04
Har
vest
11/2
7/00
7.5
8.0
1175
218
0.07
0.08
Arm
itage
(C
obur
g)11
/27/
007.
58.
010
682
190.
060.
08M
ohaw
k R
iver
11/2
7/00
7.4
7.0
4665
523
0.04
0.18
Hen
dric
ks1/
29/0
17.
36.
0N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]58
117
ND
0.10
Hay
den
Brid
ge1/
29/0
17.
45.
0N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]56
118
ND
0.08
Har
vest
1/29
/01
7.4
5.0
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
612
17N
D0.
13A
rmita
ge (
Cob
urg)
1/29
/01
7.4
5.0
1164
218
0.02
0.14
Moh
awk
Riv
er1/
29/0
17.
25.
526
525
17N
D0.
23
Hen
dric
ks2/
26/0
17.
37.
0N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]58
118
0.06
0.10
Hay
den
Brid
ge2/
26/0
17.
26.
0N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]62
118
0.10
0.08
Har
vest
2/26
/01
7.3
5.5
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
722
190.
040.
17A
rmita
ge (
Cob
urg)
2/26
/01
7.2
6.0
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
702
190.
060.
14M
ohaw
k R
iver
2/26
/01
7.1
6.0
1453
418
0.04
0.17
Hen
dric
ks3/
26/0
17.
48.
515
502
160.
040.
08H
ayde
n B
ridge
3/26
/01
7.4
8.5
1650
216
0.06
0.09
Har
vest
3/26
/01
7.4
9.0
1063
317
0.05
0.12
Arm
itage
(C
obur
g)3/
26/0
17.
59.
013
612
170.
050.
12M
ohaw
k R
iver
3/26
/01
7.4
9.0
2146
617
0.03
0.23
N
ote:
ND
= N
on-d
etec
t; FQ
A =
Fai
led
qual
ity a
ssur
ance
(Con
tinue
d on
nex
t pag
e)
56 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.3 C
ontin
ued
Sta
tion
Dat
epH
Tem
p (º
C)
Col
or
(P
t-Co
units
)C
ondu
ctiv
ity
(µs/
cm)
Turb
idity
(N
TU)
Har
dnes
s (m
g/L)
Tota
l P
hosp
horu
s (m
g/L)
Tota
l N
itrog
en
(mg/
L)
In V
ivo
Chl
orop
hyll
(mg/
L)H
endr
icks
4/30
/01
7.3
9.0
ND
[<10
Pt-C
o]48
115
0.09
0.11
Hay
den
Brid
ge4/
30/0
17.
39.
0N
D [<
10 P
t-Co]
512
150.
090.
06H
arve
st4/
30/0
17.
410
.0N
D [<
10 P
t-Co]
592
160.
080.
10A
rmita
ge (C
obur
g)4/
30/0
17.
39.
0N
D [<
10 P
t-Co]
572
160.
060.
11M
ohaw
k R
iver
4/30
/01
7.2
11.0
1849
517
0.07
0.14
Hen
dric
ks5/
21/0
17.
312
.524
483
150.
070.
14H
ayde
n B
ridge
5/21
/01
7.3
13.0
1646
216
0.09
0.09
Har
vest
5/21
/01
7.3
13.0
2152
216
0.13
0.13
Arm
itage
(Cob
urg)
5/21
/01
7.3
12.5
2650
315
0.05
0.10
Moh
awk
Riv
er5/
21/0
17.
314
.033
475
170.
080.
16
Hen
dric
ks6/
18/0
17.
213
.5N
D [<
10 P
t-Co]
571
170.
070.
111.
02H
ayde
n B
ridge
6/18
/01
7.3
14.0
ND
[<10
Pt-C
o]56
118
0.05
0.06
0.29
Har
vest
6/18
/01
7.5
13.5
972
120
ND
0.09
0.27
Arm
itage
(Cob
urg)
6/18
/01
7.4
13.5
1079
219
0.04
0.12
1.00
Moh
awk
Riv
er6/
18/0
17.
215
.316
563
19N
D0.
140.
44
Hen
dric
ks7/
30/0
17.
314
.07
551
180.
080.
030.
67H
ayde
n B
ridge
7/30
/01
7.4
17.5
1356
118
0.10
0.02
0.37
Har
vest
7/30
/01
7.5
14.5
871
220
0.10
0.06
1.26
Arm
itage
(Cob
urg)
7/30
/01
7.5
15.0
971
120
0.05
0.05
2.02
Moh
awk
Riv
er7/
30/0
17.
414
.017
614
220.
110.
080.
89
Hen
dric
ks8/
27/0
17.
417
.0N
D [<
10 P
t-Co]
541
17N
D0.
220.
66H
ayde
n B
ridge
8/27
/01
7.3
16.0
ND
[<10
Pt-C
o]55
218
ND
0.07
1.50
Har
vest
8/27
/01
7.3
15.5
ND
[<10
Pt-C
o]67
219
ND
0.19
1.46
Arm
itage
(Cob
urg)
8/27
/01
7.4
16.0
ND
[<10
Pt-C
o]66
119
ND
0.20
0.98
Moh
awk
Riv
er8/
27/0
17.
320
.010
645
23N
D0.
201.
31
Not
e: N
D =
Non
-det
ect
Technical Bulletin No. 868 57
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
to 2
001
6.8
7.0
7.2
7.4
7.6
7.8
8.0
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Feb-0
1 Mar-01
Apr-01 May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01
Aug-01
pH
Hend
ricks
Ha
yden
Brid
geHa
rves
t A
rmita
ge (C
obur
g)M
ohaw
k Ri
ver
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
to 2
001
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Temperature (ºC)
Hend
ricks
Ha
yden
Brid
geHa
rves
t A
rmita
ge (C
obur
g)M
ohaw
k Ri
ver
F
igur
e 3.
35 M
cKen
zie
Riv
er p
H
Fig
ure
3.36
McK
enzi
e R
iver
Tem
pera
ture
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
to 2
001
051015202530354045 Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01Color (Pt-Co Units)
Hend
ricks
Ha
yden
Brid
geHa
rves
t A
rmita
ge (C
obur
g)M
ohaw
k Ri
ver
Fi
gure
3.3
7 M
cKen
zie
Riv
er C
olor
58 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
to 2
001
405060708090 Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Conductivity (µs/cm)He
ndric
ks
Hayd
en B
ridge
Harv
est
Arm
itage
(Cob
urg)
Moh
awk
Rive
r
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
to 2
001
0123456789
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-0
0 Dec-0
0Ja
n-01 Feb
-01Mar-
01Apr-
01May
-01Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1 Aug-01
Turbidity (NTU)
Hend
ricks
Ha
yden
Brid
geHa
rves
t A
rmita
ge (C
obur
g)M
ohaw
k Ri
ver
F
igur
e 3.
38 M
cKen
zie
Riv
er C
ondu
ctiv
ity
F
igur
e 3.
39 M
cKen
zie
Riv
er T
urbi
dity
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
to 2
001
1012141618202224262830 Sep-0
0Oct-
00Nov
-00Dec
-00
Jan-0
1Feb
-01Mar
-01Apr-
01May
-01Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1 Aug-01
Hardness (mg/L)
Hend
ricks
Ha
yden
Brid
geHa
rves
t A
rmita
ge (C
obur
g)M
ohaw
k Ri
ver
Fi
gure
3.4
0 M
cKen
zie
Riv
er H
ardn
ess
Technical Bulletin No. 868 59
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
to 2
001
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14 Sep
-00Oct-
00Nov
-00Dec
-00Ja
n-01 Feb
-01Mar-
01Apr-
01May
-01Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1 Aug-01
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)He
ndric
ks
Hayd
en B
ridge
Harv
est
Arm
itage
(Cob
urg)
Moh
awk
Rive
r
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
to 2
001
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30 Sep
-00Oct-
00Nov
-00Dec
-00Ja
n-01 Feb
-01Mar-
01Apr-
01May
-01Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1 Aug-01
Total Nitrogen (mg/L)
Hend
ricks
Ha
yden
Brid
geHa
rves
t A
rmita
ge (C
obur
g)M
ohaw
k Ri
ver
Figu
re 3
.41
McK
enzi
e R
iver
Tot
al P
hosp
horu
s
Figu
re 3
.42
McK
enzi
e R
iver
Tot
al N
itrog
en
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
to 2
001
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
Jun-0
1
Jul-0
1
Aug-01
In Vivo Chlorophyll (mg/L)
Hend
ricks
Ha
yden
Brid
geHa
rves
t A
rmita
ge (C
obur
g)M
ohaw
k Ri
ver
Fi
gure
3.4
3 M
cKen
zie
Riv
er In
Viv
o C
hlor
ophy
ll
60 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.4 W
illam
ette
Riv
er W
ater
Che
mis
try
Sta
tion
Dat
epH
Tem
p (º
C)
Col
or
(Pt-
Co
units
)C
ondu
ctiv
ity
(µs/
cm)
Tur
bidi
ty
(NT
U)
Har
dnes
s (m
g/L)
Tot
al
Pho
spho
rus
(mg/
L)
Tot
al
Nitr
ogen
(m
g/L)
Har
risbu
rg9/
25/0
07.
613
.0N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]65
318
FQ
AF
QA
Car
tney
9/
25/0
07.
513
.0N
D [
<10
Pt-
Co]
613
18F
QA
FQ
AP
eoria
9/25
/00
7.1
13.0
ND
[<
10 P
t-C
o]12
62
41F
QA
FQ
AC
orva
llis
9/25
/00
7.6
13.0
1269
319
FQ
AF
QA
Long
Tom
Riv
er9/
25/0
07.
513
.014
603
18F
QA
FQ
A
Har
risbu
rg10
/23/
007.
611
.011
692
22F
QA
FQ
AC
artn
ey
10/2
3/00
7.3
11.5
1065
319
FQ
AF
QA
Peo
ria10
/23/
007.
111
.0N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]12
13
38F
QA
FQ
AC
orva
llis
10/2
3/00
7.3
11.0
1774
520
FQ
AF
QA
Long
Tom
Riv
er10
/23/
007.
112
.046
7719
23F
QA
FQ
A
Har
risbu
rg11
/27/
007.
59.
011
873
190.
050.
18C
artn
ey
11/2
7/00
7.4
9.0
1084
219
0.07
0.17
Peo
ria11
/27/
007.
29.
0N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]11
73
350.
080.
13C
orva
llis
11/2
7/00
7.5
8.5
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
753
200.
070.
22Lo
ng T
om R
iver
11/2
7/00
7.4
6.0
5010
616
280.
160.
44
Har
risbu
rg1/
29/0
17.
45.
5N
D [
<10
Pt-
Co]
763
210.
030.
34C
artn
ey
1/29
/01
7.4
6.0
1371
320
0.02
0.38
Peo
ria1/
29/0
17.
16.
0N
D [<
10 P
t-C
o]11
72
38N
D0.
32C
orva
llis
1/29
/01
7.4
5.5
1683
422
0.04
0.44
Long
Tom
Riv
er1/
29/0
17.
45.
046
140
1846
0.03
1.84
Har
risbu
rg2/
26/0
17.
36.
510
733
21C
artn
ey
2/26
/01
7.2
6.5
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
733
21P
eoria
2/26
/01
7.0
7.0
ND
[<10
Pt-
Co]
110
235
Cor
valli
s2/
26/0
17.
26.
511
855
24Lo
ng T
om R
iver
2/26
/01
7.3
7.0
4813
514
46
Har
risbu
rg3/
26/0
17.
39.
019
663
200.
040.
24C
artn
ey
3/26
/01
7.3
9.0
1666
420
0.05
0.28
Peo
ria3/
26/0
17.
29.
015
111
237
0.04
0.24
Cor
valli
s3/
26/0
17.
49.
515
785
220.
050.
33Lo
ng T
om R
iver
3/26
/01
7.4
10.0
5013
016
440.
030.
74
Not
e: N
D =
Non
-det
ect;
FQA
= F
aile
d qu
ality
ass
uran
ce
(Con
tinue
d on
nex
t pag
e)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 61
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.4 C
ontin
ued
Sta
tion
Dat
epH
Tem
p (º
C)
Col
or
(Pt-C
o un
its)
Con
duct
ivity
(µ
s/cm
)Tu
rbid
ity
(NTU
)H
ardn
ess
(mg/
L)
Tota
l P
hosp
horu
s (m
g/L)
Tota
l N
itrog
en
(mg/
L)
In V
ivo
Chl
orop
hyll
(mg/
L)
Har
risbu
rg4/
30/0
17.
310
.016
604
180.
070.
22C
artn
ey
4/30
/01
7.3
11.0
1360
218
0.17
0.19
Peo
ria4/
30/0
17.
112
.013
108
234
0.07
0.17
Cor
vallis
4/30
/01
7.4
12.0
1175
221
0.09
0.26
Long
Tom
Riv
er4/
30/0
17.
411
.016
652
200.
090.
26
Har
risbu
rg5/
21/0
17.
312
.017
643
180.
060.
21C
artn
ey
5/21
/01
7.2
13.0
1754
318
0.05
0.20
Peo
ria5/
21/0
17.
113
.521
744
240.
050.
20C
orva
llis5/
21/0
17.
414
.022
594
180.
040.
20Lo
ng T
om R
iver
5/21
/01
7.3
13.0
2254
418
0.04
0.22
Har
risbu
rg6/
18/0
17.
314
.5N
D [<
10 P
t-Co]
662
200.
060.
290.
99C
artn
ey
6/18
/01
7.3
15.0
ND
[<10
Pt-C
o]67
220
0.04
0.32
1.44
Peo
ria6/
18/0
17.
012
.514
115
839
0.49
2.32
6.93
Cor
vallis
6/18
/01
7.2
15.5
1792
225
0.09
0.22
1.04
Long
Tom
Riv
er6/
18/0
17.
314
.519
732
210.
120.
290.
88
Har
risbu
rg7/
30/0
17.
516
.514
712
200.
090.
311.
75C
artn
ey
7/30
/01
7.4
16.0
ND
[<10
Pt-C
o]69
221
0.06
0.31
1.86
Peo
ria7/
30/0
17.
116
.0N
D [<
10 P
t-Co]
102
233
0.07
0.11
1.29
Cor
vallis
7/30
/01
7.4
17.0
3476
322
0.06
0.25
1.79
Long
Tom
Riv
er7/
30/0
17.
219
.049
126
1539
0.04
0.60
3.13
Har
risbu
rg8/
27/0
17.
317
.0N
D [<
10 P
t-Co]
682
22N
D0.
222.
65C
artn
ey
8/27
/01
7.3
17.5
ND
[<10
Pt-C
o]65
320
ND
0.27
2.83
Peo
ria8/
27/0
16.
917
.0N
D [<
10 P
t-Co]
942
310.
030.
071.
15C
orva
llis8/
27/0
17.
317
.0N
D [<
10 P
t-Co]
712
21N
D0.
154.
94Lo
ng T
om R
iver
8/27
/01
7.2
17.0
ND
[<10
Pt-C
o]66
220
ND
0.18
2.16
N
ote:
ND
= N
on-d
etec
t
62 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
6.8
6.9
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
Sep-0
0Oct-
00Nov
-00 Dec
-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
pH
Har
risbu
rgC
artn
ey
Peor
iaC
orva
llisLo
ng T
om R
iver
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
Sep-0
0 Oct-00
Nov-0
0 Dec-0
0Ja
n-01 Feb
-01Mar
-01Apr-
01May
-01Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1 Aug-0
1
Temperature (C)
Har
risbu
rgC
artn
ey
Peor
iaC
orva
llisLo
ng T
om R
iver
Figu
re 3
.44
Will
amet
te R
iver
pH
Fig
ure
3.45
Will
amet
te R
iver
Tem
pera
ture
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
010203040506070
Sep-0
0Oct-
00Nov
-00 Dec
-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Color (Pt-Co units)
Har
risbu
rg
Car
tney
Peor
ia
Cor
vallis
Long
Tom
Riv
er
Fi
gure
3.4
6 W
illam
ette
Riv
er C
olor
Technical Bulletin No. 868 63
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
406080100
120
140
160
180
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Conductivity (µs/cm)
Harr
isbu
rgCa
rtney
Pe
oria
Corv
allis
Long
Tom
Riv
er
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
02468101214161820
Sep-0
0Oct-
00Nov
-00 Dec
-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Turbidity (NTU)
Harr
isbu
rgCa
rtney
Pe
oria
Corv
allis
Long
Tom
Riv
er
Fi
gure
3.4
7 W
illam
ette
Riv
er C
ondu
ctiv
ity
F
igur
e 3.
48 W
illam
ette
Riv
er T
urbi
dity
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
15202530354045505560 Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Hardness (mg/L)
Harr
isbu
rgCa
rtney
Pe
oria
Corv
allis
Long
Tom
Riv
er
Fi
gure
3.4
9 W
illam
ette
Riv
er H
ardn
ess
64 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
Sep-0
0 Oct-00
Nov-0
0 Dec-0
0Ja
n-01 Feb
-01Mar
-01Apr-
01May
-01Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1 Aug-0
1
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)
Har
risbu
rg
Car
tney
Pe
oria
Cor
vallis
Long
Tom
Riv
er
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
Sep-0
0Oct-
00Nov
-00 Dec
-00
Jan-0
1 Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01 Aug
-01
Total Nitrogen (mg/L)
Har
risbu
rg
Car
tney
Peor
ia
Cor
vallis
Long
Tom
Riv
er
Figu
re 3
.50
Will
amet
te R
iver
Tot
al P
hosp
horu
s
Fig
ure
3.51
Will
amet
te R
iver
Tot
al N
itrog
en
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
Jun-0
1
Jul-0
1
Aug-0
1In Vivo Chlorophyll (mg/L)
Har
risbu
rg
Car
tney
Peor
ia
Cor
vallis
Long
Tom
Riv
er
Fi
gure
3.5
2 W
illam
ette
Riv
er In
Viv
o C
hlor
ophy
ll
Technical Bulletin No. 868 65
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
66 Technical Bulletin No. 868
3.5. Effluent Chemistry
Samples of effluent were taken by local mill personnel and shipped overnight on ice to the NCASI West Coast Regional Center for chemical characterization, and to NABF for general water quality analysis including but not limited to color, tannin/lignin, conductivity, turbidity, TSS, BOD, COD and TOC. The New Augusta mill collected composite samples in November and February, and grab samples from April to August 2001; the remaining mills collected grab samples. The value reported for phytosterols is the sum for four analytes: campesterol, stigmasterol, β-sitosterol and stigmatanol. The value reported for resin acids is the sum for ten analytes: pimaric acid, sandrocopimaric acid, isopimaric acid, palustric acid, dehyroacietic acid, abietic acid, neoabieteic acid, 14-chlorodehydroabietic acid, 12-chlorodehydroabeitic acid, and dichlorodehydroabietic acid. The phytosterol non-detect column and the resin acids non-detect column report how many out of the total components measured were non-detects. Tables 3.5-3.8 present the results of the analyses.
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.5 M
ill E
fflu
ent A
naly
sis f
or th
e C
odor
us C
reek
Fac
ility
, Loc
ated
in S
prin
g G
rove
, Pen
nsyl
vani
a
Dat
eC
olor
(P
CU
)
Tann
in/
Lign
in
(mg/
L)
Con
duc-
tivity
(µ
s/cm
)
Turb
idity
(N
TU)
TSS
(m
g/L)
BO
D
(mg/
L)C
OD
(m
g/L)
TOC
(m
g/L)
Tota
l P
(mg/
L)
Phy
to-
ster
ols
(µg/
L)
Phy
to-
ster
ols
non-
dete
cts
Res
in
Aci
ds
(µg/
L)
Res
in
Aci
ds
non-
dete
cts
9/25
/00
463
8.6
1965
37.
05.
016
650
ND
1.2
3/4
ND
10/1
03/
5/01
296
7.8
2265
59.
06.
016
679
ND
ND
4/4
2.36
8/10
Not
e: N
D =
non
-det
ect
Tab
le 3
.6 M
ill E
fflu
ent A
naly
sis f
or th
e Le
af R
iver
Fac
ility
, Loc
ated
in N
ew A
ugus
ta, M
issi
ssip
pi
New
Aug
usta
, MS
Dat
eS
ampl
e T
ype
Col
or
(PC
U)
Tan
nin/
Li
gnin
(m
g/L)
Con
duc-
tivity
(µ
s/cm
)
Tur
bidi
ty
(NTU
)T
SS
(m
g/L)
BO
D
(mg/
L)C
OD
(m
g/L)
TOC
(m
g/L)
Tot
al P
(m
g/L)
Phy
to-
ster
ols
(µg/
L)
Phy
to-
ster
ols
non-
dete
cts
Res
in
Aci
ds
(µg/
L)
Res
in
Aci
ds n
on-
dete
cts
11/1
3/00
com
posi
te60
720
.224
902
5.0
420
128
0.03
b5.
72/
430
.34/
102/
5/01
com
posi
te86
920
.825
005
9.0
4.8
496
180
0.04
b15
.41/
476
.33/
104/
23/0
1gr
ab75
821
.311
.547
317
8N
D4/
30/0
1gr
ab84
723
.620
.348
617
70.
425/
7/01
grab
673
19.1
3080
915
.33.
938
714
90.
553.
03/
434
.84/
105/
14/0
1gr
ab70
216
.819
.334
912
80.
765/
21/0
1gr
ab53
716
.814
.333
314
70.
666/
25/0
1gr
ab10
1732
.529
0517
33.5
8.1
500
207
23.6
1/4
92.5
3/10
8/20
/01
grab
659
18.5
2470
711
.033
412
30.
202.
23/
411
.27/
10
N
ote:
ND
= n
on-d
etec
t
Technical Bulletin No. 868 67
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.7 M
ill E
fflu
ent A
naly
sis f
or th
e M
cKen
zie
Riv
er F
acili
ty, L
ocat
ed in
Spr
ingf
ield
, Ore
gon
Dat
eC
olor
(P
CU
)
Tann
in/
Lign
in
(mg/
L)
Con
duc-
tivity
(µ
s/cm
)
Turb
idity
(N
TU)
TSS
(mg/
L)BO
D
(mg/
L)C
OD
(m
g/L)
TOC
(m
g/L)
Tota
l P
(mg/
L)
Phyt
o-st
erol
s (µ
g/L)
Phyt
o-st
erol
s no
n -de
tect
s
Res
in
Acid
s (µ
g/L)
Res
in
Acid
s no
n-de
tect
s10
/23/
0017
316
.812
4416
22.8
100
550.
4123
.00/
41.
49/
1012
/11/
0012
915
.713
3024
31.5
18.2
116
670.
7267
.90/
412
.36/
106/
11/0
117
520
.814
3621
38.5
123
570.
5567
.90/
420
.54/
108/
28/0
113
016
.317
5616
28.0
17.2
129
650.
4616
.60/
412
.26/
10
Tab
le 3
.8 M
ill E
fflu
ent A
naly
sis f
or th
e W
illam
ette
Riv
er F
acili
ty, L
ocat
ed n
ear H
alse
y, O
rego
n
Dat
eC
olor
(P
CU
)
Tann
in/
Lign
in
(mg/
L)
Con
duc-
tivity
(µ
s/cm
)
Turb
idity
(N
TU)
TSS
(mg/
L)BO
D
(mg/
L)C
OD
(m
g/L)
TOC
(m
g/L)
Tota
l P
(mg/
L)
Phy
to-
ster
ols
(µg/
L)
Phy
to-
ster
ols
non-
dete
cts
Res
in
Aci
ds
(µg/
L)
Res
in
Aci
ds
non-
dete
cts
11/1
3/00
448
20.2
2028
1219
.827
211
11.
3138
4.3
0/4
10.8
6/10
1/29
/01
512
24.7
1907
1820
.018
.334
013
10.
6047
1.6
0/4
4.2
9/10
3/19
/01
555
27.5
2060
1216
.533
815
60.
8849
4.9
0/4
14.4
5/10
68 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Efflu
ent 2
000
to 2
001
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Fe
b-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01
Aug-01
Color (Pt-Co Units)
Hals
ey
New
Aug
usta
Sprin
g G
rove
Sprin
gfie
ld
Efflu
ent 2
000
to 2
001
05101520253035
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Fe
b-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1
Jul-0
1Aug
-01
Tannin/Lignin (mg/L)
Hals
ey
New
Aug
usta
Sprin
g G
rove
Sprin
gfie
ld
Figu
re 3
.53
Mill
Eff
luen
t Col
or
Fig
ure
3.54
Mill
Eff
luen
t Tan
nin/
Lign
in
Efflu
ent 2
000
to 2
001
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Fe
b-01Mar-0
1Apr-0
1May
-01Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1Aug
-01
Conductivity (µs/cm)
Hals
ey
New
Aug
usta
Sprin
g G
rove
Sprin
gfie
ld
Efflu
ent 2
000
to 2
001
051015202530
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Feb
-01Mar-
01Apr-0
1May-0
1Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1Aug-0
1
Turbidity (NTU)
Hals
ey
New
Aug
usta
Sprin
g G
rove
Sprin
gfie
ld
Fi
gure
3.5
5 M
ill E
fflu
ent C
ondu
ctiv
ity
F
igur
e 3.
56 M
ill E
fflu
ent T
urbi
dity
Technical Bulletin No. 868 69
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Effl
ue
nt
2000
to
200
1
051015202530354045
Sep-0
0
Oct-00
Nov-0
0Dec
-00
Jan-0
1
Feb-
01Mar
-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1
Jul-0
1
Aug-0
1
TSS (mg/L)H
alse
y
New
Aug
usta
Spr
ing
Gro
ve
Spr
ingf
ield
Effl
ue
nt
2000
to
200
1
02468101214161820
Sep-0
0
Oct-00
Nov-0
0Dec
-00
Jan-0
1
Feb-
01Mar
-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1
Jul-0
1Aug
-01
BOD (mg/L)
Hal
sey
New
Aug
usta
Spr
ing
Gro
ve
Spr
ingf
ield
Figu
re 3
.57
Mill
Eff
luen
t TSS
Fi
gure
3.5
8 M
ill E
fflu
ent B
OD
Efflu
ent 2
000
to 2
001
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Feb
-01Mar-
01Apr-
01May
-01Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1Aug
-01
COD (mg/L)
Hals
eyNe
w A
ugus
taSp
ring
Gro
veSp
ringf
ield
Efflu
ent 2
000
to 2
001
050100
150
200
250
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Feb-0
1Mar-0
1Apr-
01May-0
1Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1Aug
-01
TOC (mg/L)
Hals
ey
New
Aug
usta
Sprin
g G
rove
Sprin
gfie
ld
Fi
gure
3.5
9 M
ill E
fflu
ent C
OD
Figu
re 3
.60
Mill
Eff
luen
t TO
C
70 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Efflu
ent 2
000
to 2
001
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Fe
b-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01
Aug-01
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)Ha
lsey
New
Aug
usta
Sprin
g G
rove
Sprin
gfie
ld
Efflu
ent 2
000
to 2
001
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Feb-01Mar-0
1Apr-0
1May-0
1Ju
n-01
Jul-0
1Aug-0
1
Phytosterols (µg/L)
Hals
ey
New
Aug
usta
Sprin
g G
rove
Sprin
gfie
ld
Fig
ure
3.61
Mill
Eff
luen
t Tot
al P
hosp
horu
s
Fi
gure
3.6
2 M
ill E
fflu
ent P
hyto
ster
ols
Efflu
ent 2
000
to 2
001
0102030405060708090100
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1Fe
b-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01
Aug-01
Resin Acids (µg/L)
Hals
ey
New
Aug
usta
Sprin
g G
rove
Sprin
gfie
ld
Fi
gure
3.6
3 M
ill E
fflu
ent R
esin
Aci
ds
Technical Bulletin No. 868 71
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 72
3.6 Effluent Bioassays
Local mill personnel took samples of effluent. Grab samples or composite samples were taken for New Augusta, the remaining mills collected grab samples. The samples were shipped overnight on ice to NABF for echinoderm and bivalve chronic assays, and to the NCASI Southern Aquatic Biology Facility in New Bern, North Carolina, for ceriodaphnia and fathead minnow chronic bioassays. Assays were performed within 7 d of sampling. The LTRWS local mill locations were Spring Grove, Pennsylvania for Codorus Creek, New Augusta, Mississippi, for the Leaf River, Springfield, Oregon for the McKenzie River, and near Halsey, Oregon, for the Willamette River.
Table 3.9 Effluent IC25 (% v/v) for the LTRWS Mills
Spring Grove, PA Date Echinoderma
(Fertilization) Bivalveb (Normal
Development) Ceriodaphnia
(Reproduction)Fathead Minnow
(Growth) 9/25/00 >70.0 39.6 >100.0 >100.0 3/5/01 >70.0 39.4 >100.0 >100.0
New Augusta, MS Date Echinoderma
(Fertilization) Bivalveb (Normal
Development) Ceriodaphnia
(Reproduction)Fathead Minnow
(Growth) 11/13/00 34.8 13.1
2/5/01 20.4 4.4 4/23/01 4/30/01 5/7/01 7.0 7.7 >100.0 >100.0
5/14/01 5/21/01 6/25/01 7.6 4.4 80.1 >100.0 8/20/01 25.1 14.2 >100.0 >100.0
Springfield, OR Date Echinoderma
(Fertilization) Bivalveb (Normal
Development) Ceriodaphnia
(Reproduction)Fathead Minnow
(Growth) 10/23/00 15.1 58.3 >100.0 12/11/00 >70.0 31.7 94.2 >100.0 6/11/01 >100.0 >100.0 6/11/01 >100.0 >100.0 8/28/01 >70.0 >100.0 >100.0
Halsey, OR Date Echinoderma
(Fertilization) Bivalveb (Normal
Development) Ceriodaphnia
(Reproduction)Fathead Minnow
(Growth) 11/13/00 28.4 13.8 65.3 >100.0 1/29/01 61.1 10.3 91.4 >100.0 3/19/01 39.9 11.7 >100.0 >100.0
a Dendraster excentricus or Strongylocentrotus purpuratus b Mytilius galloprovincialis
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 73
Spring Grove, PA
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1
Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01
Aug-01
EchinodermBivalveCeriodaphniaFathead Minnow
New Augusta, MS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Sep-0
0Oct-
00
Nov-0
0
Dec-0
0
Jan-0
1
Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01
Aug-0
1
EchinodermBivalveCeriodaphniaFathead Minnow
Figure 3.64 Spring Grove, PA, IC25s Figure 3.65 New Augusta, MS, IC25s
Springfield, OR
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1
Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01
Aug-0
1
EchinodermBivalveCeriodaphniaFathead Minnow
Halsey, OR
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-0
1
Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-0
1Ju
l-01
Aug-01
EchinodermBivalveCeriodaphniaFathead Minnow
Figure 3.66 Springfield, OR, IC25s Figure 3.67 Halsey, OR, IC25s
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 74
3.7 Periphyton
Periphyton samples were taken quarterly for chlorophyll a and semi-annually for taxonomic evaluation on Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River. On Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River, sampling was done by scraping and rinsing five cobble-size (7 to 13 cm in diameter) randomly selected rocks. Detached periphyton were rinsed into a container, filtered, and the volume (total volume and filtered volume) recorded. Rock surface area was estimated using the caliper method (Dudley et al. 2001). The Leaf River was sampled in the fall for both chlorophyll a and taxonomy, and in the spring for chlorophyll a only. Fall 2000 chlorophyll a and taxonomy sampling for the Leaf River were done using an artificial substrate, wooden dowels, exposed for five weeks with three replicates per site. Spring 2001 chlorophyll a sampling on the Leaf River was done using native sand samples with one replicate per site. All samples were split, with a portion field-filtered for pigment analysis and a portion preserved with Lugol’s Iodine for taxonomic analysis when needed. Samples were analyzed for chlorophyll a within 28 d using trichromatic methods (APHA 1998). Spring 2001 Leaf River periphyton taxonomy on the Leaf River was done using scrapings from Hester-Dendy plates and native sand samples. Periphyton taxonomy was conducted by PhycoTech, Inc. (St. Joseph, Michigan).
The periphyton and benthic macroinvertebrates shared the same sampling sites, with Codorus Creek having seven sites, the Leaf River having six sites, McKenzie River having five sites, and the Willamette River having eight sampling sites. There were three missing samples for the Leaf River for the May 2001 sampling date; the Hester-Dendy plates deployed at Downstream and McLain were not recovered, and the sand periphyton sample for New Augusta could not be analyzed. There were no missing samples for Codorus Creek, the McKenzie River, and the Willamette River.
Table 3.10 Codorus Creek Periphyton Summary, August 2000
East Arsenal Menges USGS Martin Graybill FurnaceBranch No. of Diatom Taxa 20 12 15 11 8 9 4No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 11 10 11 10 8 9 8No. of Divisions 3 3 3 4 3 3 3
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 75
East Branch
Diatom9%
Chloro- phyte4%
Cyano-phyte87%
Menges
Chloro- phyte5%
Diatom7%Cyano-
phyte88%
USGS
Chloro- phyte5%
Diatom5%
Cyano-phyte90%
Martin
Diatom2%
Cyano-phyte98%
Graybill
Cyano-phyte91% Chloro-
phyte4%
Diatom5%
Arsenal
Chloro- phyte7%
Diatom12%Cyano-
phyte81%
Furnace
Diatom2%
Chloro- phyte27%
Cyano-phyte71%
Figure 3.68 Codorus Creek Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), August 2000
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 76
Table 3.11. Codorus Creek Periphyton Summary, June 2001 East Arsenal Menges USGS Martin Graybill FurnaceBranch
No. of Diatom Taxa 17 22 20 22 17 10 11No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 10 4 7 5 9 7 9No. of Divisions 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
East Branch
Diatom11%
Chloro- phyte20%
Cyano-phyte69%
Menges
Chloro- phyte14%
Diatom6%
Cyano-phyte80%
USGS
Chloro- phyte8%
Diatom56%
Cyano-phyte36%
Martin
Diatom28%
Chloro- phyte30%Cyano-
phyte42%
Graybill
Diatom10%
Chloro- phyte17%
Cyano-phyte73%
Arsenal
Diatom64%
Cyano-phyte27%
Chloro- phyte9%
Furnace
Diatom18%
Chloro- phyte18%
Cyano-phyte64%
Figure 3.69 Codorus Creek Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division
(Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), June 2001
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 77
Table 3.12 Leaf River Periphyton Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Date Sampling Substrate TallahalaNew
Augusta Downstream Bogue Thompson McLainOctober 2000 Wooden dowels No. of Diatom Taxa 7 6 11 4 6 7October 2000 Wooden dowels No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 14 11 14 13 7 10October 2000 Wooden dowels No. of Divisions 4 3 3 4 3 3
May 2001 Sand No. of Diatom Taxa 26 no data 15 22 13 15May 2001 Sand No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 5 no data 3 3 6 9May 2001 Sand No. of Divisions 4 no data 3 4 4 2
May 2001 Hester-Dendy Plates No. of Diatom Taxa 7 9 no data 9 7 no dataMay 2001 Hester-Dendy Plates No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 9 12 no data 9 6 no dataMay 2001 Hester-Dendy Plates No. of Divisions 3 3 no data 3 3 no data
Tallahala
Chloro- phyte13%
Diatom8%
Cyano- phyte79%
New Augusta
Chloro- phyte25%
Diatom4%
Cyano- phyte71%
Downstream
Chloro- phyte17%
Diatom7%
Cyano- phyte76%
Bogue
Diatom2%
Chloro- phyte2%
Cyano- phyte96%
Thompson
Cyano- phyte92%
Diatom5%
Chloro- phyte3%
McLain
Chloro- phyte2%
Diatom6%
Cyano- phyte92%
Figure 3.70 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using
Wooden Dowels (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), October 2000
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 78
Tallahala
Cyano- phyte9%
Chloro- phyte33%
Diatom58%
Downstream
Chloro- phyte20%
Diatom76%
Cyano- phyte4%
Bogue
Cyano- phyte2%
Chloro- phyte5%Diatom
93%
Thompson
Chloro- phyte67%
Diatom33%
McLain
Diatom24%
Chloro- phyte76%
Figure 3.71 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using Sand Periphyton (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), May 2001
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 79
Tallahala
Chloro- phyte84%
Cyano- phyte11%
Diatom5%
New Augusta
Cyano- phyte11%Chloro-
phyte80%
Diatom9%
Bogue
Cyano- phyte4%
Diatom3%
Chloro- phyte93%
Thompson
Diatom2%Chloro-
phyte98%
Figure 3.72 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using Hester-Dendy Plates (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), May 2001
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 80
Table 3.13 McKenzie River Periphyton Summary, September 2000
Walterville RM20.5
Bellingers RM18.5 Mohawk RM14 Harvest RM10 Armitage RM6
No. of Diatom Taxa 12 23 21 17 19 No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 14 18 13 17 14 No. of Divisions 4 3 3 3 3
Walterville RM 20.5
Chloro-phyte1%
Cyano-phyte97%
Diatom2%
Bellingers RM 18.5
Chloro- phyte1%
Diatom8%
Cyano-phyte91%
Mohawk RM 14
Cyano-phyte81% Chloro-
phyte14%
Diatom5%
Harvest RM 10
Chloro- phyte1%
Diatom8%Cyano-
phyte91%
Armitage RM 6
Diatom5%
Cyano-phyte92%
Chloro- phyte3%
Figure 3.73 McKenzie River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), September 2000
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 81
Table 3.14 McKenzie River Periphyton Summary, July 2001 Walterville RM20.5
Bellingers RM18.5
Mohawk RM14
Harvest RM10
Armitage RM6
No. of Diatom Taxa 17 21 29 20 20 No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 7 8 7 11 7 No. of Divisions 3 3 3 3 3
Walterville RM 20.5
Diatom2%
Cyano-phyte98%
Bellingers RM 18.5
Diatom10%Cyano-
phyte86%
Chloro- phyte4%
Mohawk RM 14
Diatom29%
Chloro- phyte4%
Cyano-phyte67%
Harvest RM 10
Diatom7%
Chloro- phyte6%
Cyano-phyte87%
Armitage RM 6
Chloro- phyte32%
Diatom11%
Cyano-phyte57%
Figure 3.74 McKenzie River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), June 2001
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 82
Table 3.15 Willamette River Periphyton Summary, September 2000
Whitely RM 176
Chloro- phyte4%
Diatom14%Cyano-
phyte82%
Harrisburg RM 160
Chloro- phyte5%
Diatom16%
Cyano- phyte79%
Cartney RM 156
Chloro- phyte6%
Diatom44%
Cyano- phyte50%
Intake RM 148
Chloro- phyte14%
Diatom23%Cyano-
phyte63%
Sam Daws RM 145.5
Chloro- phyte16%
Cyano- phyte58%
Diatom26%
Snag Boat RM 143.5
Chloro- phyte4%
Diatom27%
Cyano- phyte69%
Willamette RM 134
Cyano- phyte70%
Diatom23%
Chloro- phyte7%
Corvallis RM 128
Diatom1%
Chloro- phyte3%
Cyano- phyte96%
Figure 3.75 Willamette River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing <1%), September 2000
Whitely RM 176
Harrisburg RM160
Cartney RM156
Intake RM148
Sam Daws RM 145.5
Snag Boat Willamette Corvallis RM134 RM128RM143.5
19 No. of Diatom Taxa 18 20 26 27 2426 1214 No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 12 13 10 15 1415 123 No. of Divisions 3 3 3 3 33 3
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 83
Table 3.16 Willamette River Periphyton Summary, July 2001
Snag Boat Willamette Whitely Harrisburg Cartney Intake Sam Daws
Corvallis RM 176 RM143.5 RM134 RM 145.5RM160 RM156 RM148 RM128
No. of Diatom Taxa 16 13 14 13 19 27 24 15No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 11 7 9 9 8 11 12 11No. of Divisions 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Whitely RM 176
Chloro- phyte1%
Diatom6%Cyano-
phyte93%
Harrisburg RM 160
Chloro- phyte2%
Diatom1%Cyano-
phyte97%
Cartney RM 156
Diatom3%
Cyano- phyte97%
Intake RM 148
Chloro- phyte8%
Diatom17%Cyano-
phyte75%
Sam Daws RM 145.5
Chloro- phyte5%
Diatom19%
Cyano- phyte76%
Snag Boat RM 143.5
Chloro- phyte3%
Diatom33%Cyano-
phyte64%
Willamette Park RM 134
Chloro- phyte1%
Diatom5%Cyano-
phyte94%
Corvallis RM 128
Diatom6%
Cyano- phyte94%
Figure 3.76 Willamette River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing <1%), July 2001
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
020406080100
120
140 Eas
t Branc
h
Menges
USGS
Martin
Graybil
l
Arsena
l
Furna
ce
Mean Chl a (mg/m2)
8/22
/200
011
/4/2
000
3/20
/200
1
06/1
2/01
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
010203040506070
Tallah
ala
New Augusta
Downstre
am
Bogue
Thompso
n
McLain
Mean Chl a (mg/m2)
9/15
-10/
18/0
05/
17-5
/18/
01
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
to 2
001
020406080100
120
140
160
180
Hendric
ks
Belling
ers
Mohawk
Harvest
Armita
ge
Mean Chl a (mg/m2)
09/2
1/00
12/0
7/00
03/0
8/01
07/1
2/01
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
020406080100
120
140
160
180
200
Whitely
Harrisb
urg
Cartne
y
Intak
e
Snag B
oat
Willamette
Corvall
is
Mean Chl a (mg/m2)
09/1
9/00
12/0
5/00
03/0
6/01
7/10
/01
Figu
re 3
.77
Mea
n C
hlor
ophy
ll a
(mg/
m2 ) L
TRW
S R
iver
s for
Stu
dy Y
ear 2
000
to 2
001
84 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 85
3.8 Benthic Macroinvertebrates
Benthic macroinvertebrates were collected quarterly on Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River for biomass and taxonomic evaluation. All samples from Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River were collected using a Hess sampler with five replicates per site. Leaf River samples were collected twice during the sampling period covered in this compendium, using Hester-Dendy multi-plate samplers exposed for five weeks, with three replicates per site, and macroinvertebrate collections from natural woody debris. All data were normalized to area (1m2). Samples were preserved in 10% buffered formalin and shipped to Benthix Consulting for taxonomic evaluation. Samples were returned in 10% buffered formalin to NABF for biomass analysis.
The benthic macroinvertebrate sampling sites were the same as the periphyton sampling sites, with Codorus Creek having seven sites, the Leaf River having six sites, the McKenzie River having five sites, and the Willamette River having eight sampling sites. The Leaf River had two missing samples; the Hester-Dendy plates deployed at McLain and Downstream were not recovered for the May 2001 sampling date. There were no missing samples for Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, or Willamette River.
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 86
3.8.1 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrates
Table 3.17 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Order Family Genus Species Furn
ace
Ars
enal
Gra
ybill
Mar
tin
US
GS
Men
ges
Eas
t Bra
nch
Amphipoda Gammaridae Gammarus xColeoptera Curculionidae Lixus x
Dryopidae Helichus xDytiscidae x x
Cybister xHydroporous x
Elmidae Ancyronyx variegatusDubiraphia vittataMacronychus glabratusMicrocylloepus pusillusOptioservus x
ovalistrivittatus
Oulimnius latiusculusStenelmis x
Hydrophilidae x xBerosus x
Psephenidae Ectopria xPsephenus herricki
Ptilodactylidae Anchytarsus bicolorStratiomyidae x x
Decapoda Cambaridae x xDiptera Ceratopogonidae Ceratopogon x
cf. Bezzia xCulicoides x
Chironomidae Ablabesmyia mallochiBrillia flavifronsCardiocladius xChaetocladius xChironomus xCladotanytarsus mancus gr.
vanderwulpi gr.vanderwulpi gr. Avanderwulpi gr. B
Conchapelopia fasciata gr.Corynoneura xCricotopus x
bicinctuscf. sylvestrissp. Ctrifascia
Cricotopus/Orthocladius gr. xCryptochironomus cf. blarina
cf. sorexDiamesa xDiamesa/Sympotthastia xDicrotendipes fumidus
neomodestusnervosus
Diplocladius cultrigerDoncricotopus bicaudatusEukiefferiella claripennis gr.
coerulescens gr.devonica gr.pseudomontana gr.
Hayesomyia senataHeleniella xHelopelopia cornuticaudata
(Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 87
Table 3.17 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Furn
ace
Ars
enal
Gra
ybill
Mar
tin
US
GS
Men
ges
Eas
t Bra
nch
Diptera Chironomidae Heterotrissocladius marcidus gr.Hydrobaenus xLimnophyes xLopescladius xMeropelopia flavifrons
sp. Asp. B
Microtendipes pedellus gr.Nanocladius crassicornis
distinctusspiniplenus
Natarsia baltimoreussp. A of Roback
Neozavrelia xNilotanypus fimbriatusNimbocera x
sp. Asp. B
Orthocladius xashei/rivicolacarlatuslignicolamallochirivicolarivulorumsp. Asp. B
Pagastia xparticasp. A
Paracladopelma undineParakiefferiella xParalauterborniella nigrohalteraleParametriocnemus xParatanytarsus x
inopertus gr.Paratendipes cf. albimanusPhaenopsectra obediens gr.
punctipes gr.Polypedilum aviceps
cf. halteralefallaxflavumillinoense gr.scalaenum
Potthastia gaedii gr.longimana
Procladius xPseudochironomus xRheocricotopus robackiRheotanytarsus xStempellinella xStictochironomus x
poecilopterusStilocladius xSublettea coffmaniSynorthocladius semivirensTanypus x
(Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 88
Table 3.17 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Furn
ace
Ars
enal
Gra
ybill
Mar
tin
US
GS
Men
ges
Eas
t Bra
nch
Diptera Chironomidae Tanytarsus curticornis gr.eminulus gr.pallidicornis & aculeatus gr.sp. Dsp. Esp. Fsp. G
Thienemanniella xThienemannimyia gr. xTvetenia bavarica gr.
discoloripes gr.Zavrelimyia x
Dolichopodidae x xEmpididae Chelifera x
Clinocera xHemerodromia x
Muscidae cf. Limnophora xPsychodidae cf. Pericoma xSimuliidae Prosimulium x
Simulium xTabanidae Chrysops x
Tabanus xTipulidae Antocha x
Dicranota xLimnophila xPseudolimnophila xTipula x
Ephemeroptera Baetidae Acentrella turbidaBaetis xDiphetor x
Caenidae Caenis xEphemerellidae x x
Attenella xEphemerella subvariaSerratella x
Ephemeridae Ephemera xHeptageniidae Stenonema/Stenacron xIsonychiidae Isonychia xLeptohyphidae Tricorythodes xLeptophlebiidae Leptophlebia x
x xGastropoda Ancylidae x x
Physidae Physella xGyraulus x
Hemiptera Veliidae Rhagovelia xHirudinea Erpobdellidae Mooreobdella fervida
Helobdella xfuscastagnalis
Hydracarina x x xHydroida Hydridae Hydra xIsopoda Asellidae Caecidotea xLepidoptera Pyralidae Petrophila xMegaloptera Corydalidae Corydalus cornutus
Sialidae Sialis xOdonata Aeshnidae x x
Calopterygidae x xCoenagrionidae Argia x
(Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 89
Table 3.17 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Furn
ace
Ars
enal
Gra
ybill
Mar
tin
US
GS
Men
ges
Eas
t Bra
nch
Odonata Coenagrionidae Coenagrion/Enallagma xGomphidae x x
Pelecypoda Sphaeriidae x xPlecoptera x x x
Capniidae Allocapnia xChloroperlidae Suwallia xLeuctridae Leuctra xNemouridae Amphinemura x
Prostoia xPerlidae x x
Acroneuria xPerlesta x
Taeniopterygidae Taenionema atlanticumTaeniopteryx x
metequiGlossosomatidae Anagapetus x
Trichoptera Glossosoma xGoeridae Goera xHydropsychidae x x
Cheumatopsyche xDiplectrona modestaHydropsyche x
type Atype B
Hydroptilidae Hydroptila xLeucotrichia pictipesOchrontrichia x
Lepidostomatidae Lepidostoma xLeptoceridae Ceraclea x
Mystacides xOecetis x
Philopotamidae Chimarra xDolophilodes x
Psychomyiidae Psychomyia flavidaUenoidae Neophylax x
Tricladida x x x
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 90
Table 3.18 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Date Site Total # Taxa % EPT1
% Chironomidae
% Diptera
Total Abundance (count/site)
August 2000 Furnace 56 41.9 81.3 8.3 2852August 2000 Arsenal 71 40.2 30.4 32.4 9877August 2000 Graybill 54 21.2 39.2 40.0 5847August 2000 Martin 44 41.9 27.6 28.9 6549August 2000 USGS 54 38.0 26.0 26.4 1901August 2000 Menges 80 22.8 38.2 52.7 6983August 2000 East Branch 72 36.2 47.6 52.0 2473
November 2000 Furnace 56 8.1 76.9 78.1 5441November 2000 Arsenal 60 2.8 79.2 81.4 3901November 2000 Graybill 59 22.2 40.1 42.0 10510November 2000 Martin 60 18.2 43.4 46.9 8259November 2000 USGS 71 37.8 39.7 41.0 3780November 2000 Menges 75 44.1 31.2 45.5 6557November 2000 East Branch 76 26.7 45.6 60.8 5315
March 2001 Furnace 66 4.9 64.9 66.4 1916March 2001 Arsenal 65 0.7 88.1 90.7 2172March 2001 Graybill 81 3.8 68.4 70.0 9382March 2001 Martin 68 4.3 74.5 75.3 9478March 2001 USGS 90 15.0 76.3 77.1 5081March 2001 Menges 85 8.9 80.2 86.0 12751March 2001 East Branch 99 11.7 65.0 82.8 5655
June 2001 Furnace 43 23.5 15.0 15.2 1000June 2001 Arsenal 73 5.3 72.4 73.2 3591June 2001 Graybill 59 11.8 61.4 62.2 5082June 2001 Martin 64 10.5 45.0 47.1 11642June 2001 USGS 53 46.1 15.0 15.1 1789June 2001 Menges 73 7.9 70.9 79.3 6824June 2001 East Branch 86 25.6 57.7 65.2 6278
1 EPT = Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera taxa
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.19
Cod
orus
Cre
ek B
enth
ic M
acro
inve
rtebr
ate
Bio
mas
s, St
udy
Yea
r 200
0 to
200
1(m
eans
for 5
repl
icat
es)
East
Bra
nch
Men
ges
USG
SM
artin
Gra
ybill
Arse
nal
Furn
ace
08/2
2/00
1.24
747.
4963
2.30
814.
7940
2.49
266.
5126
4.18
0911
/14/
006.
0807
19.5
226
6.08
309.
0230
11.3
351
3.70
095.
0630
03/2
0/01
6.77
218.
5260
4.46
308.
0086
8.24
882.
5035
5.65
7406
/12/
013.
8719
7.44
912.
4381
17.6
797
8.04
867.
4421
1.78
30
Mea
n D
ry W
eigh
t (g/
m2 )
East
Bra
nch
Men
ges
USG
SM
artin
Gra
ybill
Arse
nal
Furn
ace
08/2
2/00
0.65
495.
1581
1.11
143.
0500
1.55
703.
8893
2.66
0411
/14/
004.
3581
15.9
758
3.91
566.
4407
8.69
162.
2328
3.18
1903
/20/
014.
6526
6.66
262.
8435
5.94
475.
7244
1.22
583.
5167
06/1
2/01
2.37
844.
8000
1.10
589.
8077
5.95
565.
7935
0.70
91
Mea
n As
h-Fr
ee D
ry W
eigh
t (g/
m2 )
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
0.00
00
5.00
00
10.0
000
15.0
000
20.0
000
25.0
000 Eas
t Bran
ch
Menges
USGS
Martin
Graybil
l
Arsena
l
Furnac
e
g/m2
08/2
2/00
11/1
4/00
03/2
0/01
06/1
2/01
Cod
orus
Cre
ek 2
000
to 2
001
0.00
00
2.00
00
4.00
00
6.00
00
8.00
00
10.0
000
12.0
000
14.0
000
16.0
000
18.0
000
East B
ranch
Menges
USGS
Martin
Graybill
Arsena
lFurn
ace
g/m2
08/2
2/00
11/1
4/00
03/2
0/01
06/1
2/01
Figu
re 3
.78
Cod
orus
Cre
ek B
enth
ic M
acro
inve
rtebr
ate
Figu
re 3
.79
Cod
orus
Cre
ek B
enth
ic M
acro
inve
rtebr
ate
M
ean
Dry
Wei
ght
Mea
n A
sh-F
ree
Dry
Wei
ght
Technical Bulletin No. 868 91
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
East
Bra
nch
Plec
opte
ra4%
Olig
ocha
eta
4%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra6%
Hydr
acar
ina
3%
Tric
hopt
era
37%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra25
%
Chiro
nom
idae
13%
Tric
ladi
da2%
Cole
opte
ra4%
Gas
tropo
da2%
Men
ges
Tric
ladi
da1%
Chiro
nom
idae
9%
Deca
poda
1%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra8%
Isop
oda
3%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra3%
Olig
ocha
eta
4%
Cole
opte
ra1%
Am
phip
oda
8%
Tric
hopt
era
61%
USG
S
Oth
er D
ipte
ra2%
Tric
ladi
da2%
Am
phip
oda
2%Co
leop
tera
7%
Olig
ocha
eta
8%
Odo
nata
3%
Meg
alop
tera
6%
Gas
tropo
da2%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra25
%
Chiro
nom
idae
10%
Deca
poda
13%
Isop
oda
2%Hy
drac
arin
a2%
Tric
hopt
era
12%
Pele
cypo
da3%
Figu
re 3
.80
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e Fa
mily
Dis
tribu
tion
by P
erce
nt D
ry W
eigh
t for
Cod
orus
Cre
ek S
ampl
ing
Site
s Ups
tream
of M
ill
Dis
char
ge, S
tudy
Yea
r 200
0 to
200
1 (r
epre
sent
s the
sum
of a
ll re
plic
ates
and
seas
onal
sam
ples
for t
he e
ntire
stud
y ye
ar fo
r all
fam
ilies
co
ntrib
utin
g >1
% o
f the
tota
l)
92 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Mar
tinTr
icla
dida
3%C
hiro
nom
idae
6%C
oleo
pter
a13
%Tr
icho
pter
a15
%
Pel
ecyp
oda
12%
Odo
nata
22%
Meg
alop
tera
9%
Isop
oda
6%Eph
emer
opte
ra 2%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra1%
Dec
apod
a4%
Olig
ocha
eta
8%
Gra
ybill
Cole
opte
ra17
%
Tric
ladi
da2%
Am
phip
oda
1%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra4%
Deca
poda
19%
Chiro
nom
idae
10%
Tric
hopt
era
27%
Pele
cypo
da2%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra3% G
astro
poda
1%
Hydr
acar
ina
1%
Meg
alop
tera
4%
Olig
ocha
eta
9%
Arse
nal
Tric
ladi
da7%
Pele
cypo
da2%
Am
phip
oda
2%Co
leop
tera
6%
Chiro
nom
idae
11%
Olig
ocha
eta
7%Hydr
acar
ina
3% Lepi
dopt
era
2%
Isop
oda
1%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra6%
Gas
tropo
da1%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra3%
Tric
hopt
era
5%
Deca
poda
45%
Furn
ace
Oth
er D
ipte
ra2%
Chiro
nom
idae
9%
Am
phip
oda
10%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra11
% Olig
ocha
eta
13%
Pele
cypo
da2%
Cole
opte
ra13
%
Tric
ladi
da12
%
Deca
poda
20%
Gas
tropo
da1% Hi
rudi
nea
2% Odo
nata
2%
Tric
hopt
era
3%
Figu
re 3
.81
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e Fa
mily
Dis
tribu
tion
by P
erce
nt D
ry W
eigh
t for
Cod
orus
Cre
ek S
ampl
ing
Site
s Dow
nstre
am o
f Mill
D
isch
arge
, Stu
dy Y
ear 2
000
to 2
001
(rep
rese
nts t
he su
m o
f all
repl
icat
es a
nd se
ason
al sa
mpl
es fo
r the
ent
ire st
udy
year
for a
ll fa
mili
es
cont
ribut
ing
>1%
of t
he to
tal)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 93
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 94
3.8.2 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrates
Table 3.20 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Order Family Genus Species Talla
halla
New
Aug
usta
Dow
nstr
eam
Bog
ue
Thom
pson
McL
ain
Coleoptera Elmidae Ancyronyx variegatusMacronychus glabratusOrdobrevia xStenelmis x
Diptera Chironomidae Ablabesmyia xmallochi
AxarusCorynoneuraCricotopus bicinctusCricotopus/Orthocladius gr. xCricotopus xCryptochironomus cf. sorexDicrotendipes neomodestusGlyptotendipes xNanocladius crassicornis
distinctusdownesiunknown
Nilothauma xParachironomus arcuatus gr.Paratanytarsus xPentaneura xPhaenopsectra obediens gr.Polypedilum flavum
illinoense gr.scalaenum
Pseudochironomus xRheocricotopus robackiRheopelopia xRheotanytarsus xStelechomyia perpulchraStenochironomus xTanytarsus curticornis gr.
pallidicornis&aculeatus gr.sp. Dsp. E
Thienemanniella xThienemannimyia gr. x
Empididae Hemerodromia xSimuliidae Simulium x
Ephemeroptera Baetidae Baetis xCaenidae Caenis hilarisHeptageniidae Heptagenia flavescens
Stenonema exiguumintegrumtype A
unknown xIsonychiidae Isonychia xLeptohyphidae Asioplax dolani
Tricorythodes fictusGastropoda Ancylidae x xHydracarina x x xHydroida Hydridae Hydra xMegaloptera Corydalidae Corydalus cornutusOdonata Calopterygidae early instar
Coenagrionidae Argia xPelecypoda Sphaeriidae xPlecoptera Perlidae x x
Perlidae Neoperla x (Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 95
Table 3.20 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Talla
halla
New
Aug
usta
Dow
nstr
eam
Bog
ue
Thom
pson
McL
ain
Plecoptera Perlidae Paragnetina xPerlesta xx x
Trichoptera Hydropsychidae Cheumatopsyche xHydropsyche xPotamyia flavax x
Hydroptilidae Hydroptila xMayatrichia xOxyethira x
Leptoceridae Ceraclea xNectopsyche xOecetis x
Philopotamidae Chimarra xPolycentropodidae Cyrnellus fraternus
Neureclipsis xNictiophylax x
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 96
Table 3.21 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site Using Natural Woody Substrate, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Order Family Genus Species Talla
hala
New
Aug
usta
Dow
nstre
am
Bog
ue
Thom
spon
McL
ain
Coleoptera Elmidae x xMacronychus glabratusStenelmis x
Diptera Chironomidae Ablabesmyia mallochiCricotopus bicinctusCricotopus/Orthocladius gr. xNanocladius crassicornisPolypedilum flavumRheotanytarsus xThienemanniella xThienemannimyia gr. x
Empididae Hemerodromia xSimuliidae x x
Simulium xTabanidae Chrysops x
Ephemeroptera Baetidae x xBaetis x
intercalarisHeterocloeon xProcloeon x
rivulareCaenidae x x
Caenis hilarisHeptageniidae x x
Heptagenia xflavescens
Stenonema exiguummexicanumterminatum
Isonychiidae Isonychia siccaLeptohyphidae Asioplax dolani
Tricorythodes fictusTricorythidae Tricorythodes x
Hemiptera Naucoridae Pelocoris xHydracarina x x xMegaloptera Corydalidae Corydalus xOdonata Coenagrionidae Argia x
Gomphidae Erpetogomphus xPlecoptera Perlidae x x
Beloneuria xNeoperla xParagnetina xPerlesta x
Trichoptera Hydropsychidae x xCheumatopsyche xHydropsyche x
type Atype B
Hydroptilidae x xHydroptila xOxyethira x
Leptoceridae Ceraclea xPhilopotamidae Chimarra xPolycentropodidae Neureclipsis x
Nictiophylax x
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 97
Table 3.22 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Date Site Total # Taxa % EPT1 % Chironomidae % Diptera
Total Abundance (count/site)
October 2000 Tallahalla 37 60.2 37.4 38.4 1933 October 2000 New Augusta 39 72.3 25.0 27.2 2829 October 2000 Downstream 42 70.3 26.4 27.0 1224 October 2000 Bogue 28 53.3 27.0 44.6 1732 October 2000 Thompson 34 60.3 33.6 38.7 1546 October 2000 McLain 32 43.5 48.5 53.5 823 May 2001 Tallahalla 39 59.1 39.7 40.5 3163 May 2001 New Augusta 44 66.8 32.3 32.9 3699 May 2001 Downstream no sample May 2001 Bogue 37 44.0 54.5 55.2 3598 May 2001 Thompson 38 42.6 57.2 57.3 3972 May 2001 McLain no sample
1 EPT = Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera taxa
Table 3.23 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary Using Natural Woody Substrate, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Date Site Total # Taxa % EPT1 % Chironomidae % Diptera
Total Abundance (count/site)
October 2000 Tallahalla 14 90.3 0.0 1.6 62 October 2000 New Augusta 13 83.6 0.0 16.4 116 October 2000 Downstream 5 100.0 0.0 0.0 16 October 2000 Bogue 12 93.3 0.0 5.0 60 October 2000 Thompson 7 97.5 0.0 0.0 40 October 2000 McLain 9 63.6 0.0 9.1 11 May 2001 Tallahalla 23 78.3 18.9 18.9 143 May 2001 New Augusta 9 72.1 20.9 23.3 43 May 2001 Downstream 16 69.8 29.1 30.2 179 May 2001 Bogue 16 84.3 7.8 7.8 51 May 2001 Thompson 19 86.0 7.0 8.8 57 May 2001 McLain 12 96.4 3.6 3.6 55
1 EPT = Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera taxa
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.24
Lea
f Riv
er B
enth
ic M
acro
inve
rtebr
ate
Bio
mas
s Usi
ng H
este
r-D
endy
Pla
tes,
Stud
y Y
ear 2
000
to 2
001
(mea
ns fo
r 3 re
plic
ates
)
Talla
hala
New
Aug
usta
Dow
nstre
am
Bog
ueTh
omps
onM
cLai
n10
/16/
002.
1566
2.91
761.
7929
1.92
172.
3622
1.44
7203
/17/
014.
2775
8.59
40no
dat
a6.
2711
9.27
79no
dat
a
Mea
n D
ry W
eigh
t (g/
m2 )
Talla
hala
New
Aug
usta
Dow
nstre
am
Bog
ueTh
omps
onM
cLai
n10
/16/
001.
2494
1.80
261.
0225
1.03
930.
6183
1.14
5703
/17/
013.
2393
7.31
31no
dat
a5.
0390
8.11
35no
dat
a
Mea
n A
sh-F
ree
Dry
Wei
ght (
g/m
2 )
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
0.00
001.
0000
2.00
003.
0000
4.00
005.
0000
6.00
007.
0000
8.00
009.
0000
10.0
000 Ta
llaha
laNew
Augus
taDow
nstre
am
Bogue
Thom
pson
McLain
g/m2
10/1
6/00
03/1
7/01
Leaf
Riv
er 2
000
to 2
001
0.00
00
1.00
00
2.00
00
3.00
00
4.00
00
5.00
00
6.00
00
7.00
00
8.00
00
9.00
00
Talla
halaNew
Augus
taDow
nstre
am
Bogue
Thomps
on
McLain
g/m2
10/1
6/00
03/1
7/01
Figu
re 3
.82
Lea
f Riv
er B
enth
ic M
acro
inve
rtebr
ate
F
igur
e 3.
83 L
eaf R
iver
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e
Mea
n D
ry W
eigh
t Usi
ng H
este
r-D
endy
Pla
tes
M
ean
Ash
-Fre
e D
ry W
eigh
t Usi
ng H
este
r-D
endy
Pla
tes
98 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Talla
hala
Tric
hopt
era
55%
Chiro
nom
idae
6%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra22
%
Hydr
acar
ina
4%
Cole
opte
ra2%
Olig
ocha
eta
2%
Gas
tropo
da2%
Plec
opte
ra5%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra3%
New
Aug
usta
Ephe
mer
opte
ra30
%
Gas
tropo
da2%
Meg
alop
tera
18%
Tric
hopt
era
43%
Plec
opte
ra1%
Hydr
acar
ina
1%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra2%
Chiro
nom
idae
3%
Figu
re 3
.84
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e Fa
mily
Dis
tribu
tion
by P
erce
nt D
ry W
eigh
t for
the
Leaf
Riv
er S
ampl
ing
Site
s Ups
tream
of M
ill
Dis
char
ge U
sing
Hes
ter-
Den
dy P
late
s, St
udy
Yea
r 200
0 to
200
1 (r
epre
sent
s the
sum
of a
ll re
plic
ates
and
seas
onal
sam
ples
for t
he e
ntire
stud
y ye
ar
for a
ll fa
mili
es c
ontri
butin
g >1
% o
f the
tota
l)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 99
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Dow
nstre
am
Oth
er D
ipte
ra3%
Olig
ocha
eta
7%Pe
lecy
poda
1%
Plec
opte
ra3%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra38
%Tr
icho
pter
a19
%
Odo
nata
7%
Gas
tropo
da5%
Meg
alop
tera
9%
Hydr
acar
ina
1%
Chiro
nom
idae
6%
Bog
ue
Gas
tropo
da2%
Chiro
nom
idae
5%
Meg
alop
tera
3%
Pele
cypo
da1%
Plec
opte
ra2%
Olig
ocha
eta
2%
Hydr
acar
ina
2%
Tric
hopt
era
63%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra15
%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra3%
Cole
opte
ra1%
Thom
pson
Meg
alop
tera
1%
Gas
tropo
da2%
Chiro
nom
idae
4%O
ther
Dip
tera
2%Ep
hem
erop
tera
15%
Olig
ocha
eta
2%Hydr
acar
ina
2%
Plec
opte
ra1%
Tric
hopt
era
71%
McL
ain
Chiro
nom
idae
9%
Gas
tropo
da11
%
Olig
ocha
eta
12%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra28
%
Hydr
acar
ina
7% Meg
alop
tera
15%
Tric
hopt
era
12%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra7%
Figu
re 3
.85
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e Fa
mily
Dis
tribu
tion
by P
erce
nt D
ry W
eigh
t for
the
Leaf
Riv
er S
ampl
ing
Site
s Dow
nstre
am o
f Mill
D
isch
arge
Usi
ng H
este
r-D
endy
Pla
tes,
Stud
y Y
ear 2
000
to 2
001
(rep
rese
nts t
he su
m o
f all
repl
icat
es a
nd se
ason
al sa
mpl
es fo
r the
ent
ire st
udy
year
fo
r all
fam
ilies
con
tribu
ting
>1%
of t
he to
tal)
100 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 101
3.8.3 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrates
Table 3.25 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Order Family Genus Species Arm
itage
R
M 6
Har
vest
R
M 1
0
Moh
awk
RM
14
Bel
linge
rs
RM
18.
5
Wal
terv
ille
RM
20.
5
Amphipoda Gammaridae x xGammarus x
Coleoptera Dytiscidae x xHydrovatus xOreodytes x
Elmidae x xAmpumixis disparCleptelmis xGonielmis xHeterlimnius xMacronychus glabratusNarpus xOptioservus xRhizelmis nigraRhizelmis xStenelmis xZaitzevia x
Diptera x x xCeratopogonidae x x
cf. Bezzia xCulicoides xProbezzia x
Chironomidae Ablabesmyia mallochiBrillia flavifronsCardiocladius xChironomus xCladotanytarsus vanderwulpi gr. A
vanderwulpi gr. Bvanderwulpi gr. C
Conchapelopia fasciata gr.Corynoneura xCricotopus x
bicinctusnostocicolasp. Bsp. Ctrifascia
Cricotopus/Orthocladius gr. xCryptochironomus cf. sorexDemichryptochironomus xDiamesa xDicrotendipes fumidusEukiefferiella brehmi gr.
claripennis gr.coerulescens gr.devonica gr.gracei gr.pseudomontana gr.
Euryhapsis xHeleniella xHeterotrissocladius marcidus gr.Krenosmittia xLimnophyes xLopescladius xMicropsectra x
sp. Asp. B
Microtendipes pedellus gr. (Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 102
Table 3.25 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Arm
itage
R
M 6
Har
vest
R
M 1
0
Moh
awk
RM
14
Bel
linge
rs
RM
18.
5
Wal
terv
ille
RM
20.
5
Diptera Chironomidae Monodiamesa xNanocladius crassicornis
distinctusrectinervis
Nilotanypus fimbriatusNimbocera sp. AOrthocladius x
asheiashei/rivicolacarlatuscurtisetaluteipesmallochirivicolarivulorumsaxosussp. Asp. Bsp. C
Pagastia xparticasp. A
Paracladopelma undinewinnelli
Parakiefferiella xParametriocnemus xParatanytarsus x
tenellulus gr.Pentaneura xPhaenopsectra obediens gr.
punctipes gr.Polypedilum aviceps
laetumfallaxflavumillinoense gr.scalaenumtritum
Potthastia gaedii gr.longimana
Procladius xRheocricotopus eminellobus
robackiRheopelopia x
perdaRheotanytarsus xRobackia demeijereiSmittia xStempellina xStempellinella xSublettea coffmaniSymposiocladius lignicolaSympotthastia xSynorthocladius semivirensTanytarsus curticornis gr.
gregarius & lugens gr.pallidicornis&aculeatus gr.sp. D
Thienemanniella xThienemannimyia gr. xTvetenia bavarica gr.
discoloripes gr. (Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 103
Table 3.25 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Arm
itage
R
M 6
Har
vest
R
M 1
0
Moh
awk
RM
14
Bel
linge
rs
RM
18.
5
Wal
terv
ille
RM
20.
5
Diptera Empididae x xChelifera xHemerodromia xTrichoclinocera x
Muscidae x xSimuliidae x x
Prosimulium xSimulium x
Tabanidae Chrysops xTanyderidae x x
Protanyderus xTipulidae x x
Antocha xCryptolabis xDicranota xHesperoconopa xHexatoma x
Ephemeroptera Baetidae x xAcentrella xBaetis xDiphetor hageniHeterocloeon xProcloeon x
Ephemerellidae x xAttenella margaritaCaudatella xDrunella x
doddsitype A
Epeorus xEphemerella x
aurivilliinermis
Eurylophella xSerratella levis
tibialisTimpanoga hecuba
Heptageniidae x xEpeorus (Iron) xHeptagenia xLeucrocuta xRithrogena xStenonema x
Leptophlebiidae x xLeptophlebia xParaleptophebia x
bicornutasp. B
Tricorythodes xGastropoda x x x
Ancylidae x xHydrobiidae x x
Amnicola xPhysidae Physella xPlanorbidae x x
Gyraulus xVorticifex effusa
Pleuroceridae Juga xhemphilliplicifera
Hemiptera Corixidae Sigara xHydracarina x x x
(Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 104
Table 3.25 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Arm
itage
R
M 6
Har
vest
R
M 1
0
Moh
awk
RM
14
Bel
linge
rs
RM
18.
5
Wal
terv
ille
RM
20.
5
Hydroida Hydridae Hydra xLepidoptera Pyralidae Petrophila xOdonata Gomphidae x xOligochaeta x x xPelecypoda Sphaeriidae x xPlecoptera x x x
Capniidae x xChloroperlidae x x
Neaviperla forcipataSuwallia xSweltsa x
Leuctridae x xDespaxia augusta
Nemouridae x xMalenka xZapada xZapada cinctipes
Perlidae x xCalineuria californicaClaassenia sabulosaHesperoperla pacifica
Perlodidae x xCascadoperla tricturaCultus xIsogenoides xIsoperla type A
type Btype C
Osobenus yakimaePerlinodes aureusSkwala x
curvataPteronarcyidae Pteronarcys x
californicaTrichoptera x x x
Brachycentridae x xAmiocentrus aspilusBrachycentrus x
occidentalisMicrasema x
Glossosomatidae x xGlossosoma x
Hydropsychidae x xArctopsyche grandisCheumatopsyche xHydropsyche x
Hydroptilidae Hydroptila xLepidostomatidae Lepidostoma xLeptoceridae Ceraclea x
Mystacides alafimbriataLeptoceridae Oecetis xLimnephilidae x x
Asynarchus xgilvipes
Philopotamidae Chimarra xPsychomyiidae psychomyia flavidaRhyacophilidae Rhyacophila x
arnauditype Atype Btype C
Tricladida x x x
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 105
Table 3.26 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Date Site Total # Taxa % EPT1
% Chironomidae
% Diptera
Total Abundance (count/site)
September 2000 Armitage RM6 62 33.6 41.5 41.8 3188September 2000 Harvest RM10 98 27.9 58.2 58.6 15965September 2000 Mohawk RM14 62 13.6 53.9 56.0 2360September 2000 Bellingers RM18.5 77 39.7 41.9 50.9 3649September 2000 Walterville RM20.5 96 44.7 39.6 41.5 5891
December 2000 Armitage RM6 58 68.8 19.1 20.3 2062December 2000 Harvest RM10 65 53.8 42.2 42.5 10154December 2000 Mohawk RM14 54 20.2 22.5 28.0 4328December 2000 Bellingers RM18.5 57 47.5 35.0 46.8 4160December 2000 Walterville RM20.5 66 72.9 16.5 21.1 4319
March 2001 Armitage RM6 67 26.6 67.8 68.6 8103March 2001 Harvest RM10 79 52.0 41.6 42.2 13541March 2001 Mohawk RM14 67 16.8 51.5 54.8 9987March 2001 Bellingers RM18.5 81 41.3 46.4 51.6 6871March 2001 Walterville RM20.5 74 39.4 38.7 42.5 5210
July 2001 Armitage RM6 92 6.4 69.9 69.6 10306July 2001 Harvest RM10 92 14.7 59.6 61.9 14642July 2001 Mohawk RM14 75 2.8 16.8 18.1 19138July 2001 Bellingers RM18.5 94 14.5 67.6 69.9 11852July 2001 Walterville RM20.5 95 19.2 49.2 52.5 11346 1 EPT = Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera taxa
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.27
McK
enzi
e R
iver
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e B
iom
ass,
Stud
y Y
ear 2
000
to 2
001(
mea
ns fo
r 5 re
plic
ates
)
Wal
terv
ille
RM
20.
5Be
llinge
rs
RM
18.
5M
ohaw
k R
M 1
4H
arve
st
RM
10
Arm
itage
R
M 6
9/21
/200
02.
8184
1.77
981.
9879
4.22
671.
3835
12/7
/200
04.
9300
3.19
333.
0749
8.80
563.
4505
3/8/
2001
8.27
517.
8749
4.88
5311
.168
14.
8612
7/12
/200
14.
4214
5.49
848.
2512
8.68
446.
2756
Mea
n D
ry W
eigh
t (g/
m2 )
Wal
terv
ille
RM
20.
5Be
llinge
rs
RM
18.
5M
ohaw
k R
M 1
4H
arve
st
RM
10
Arm
itage
R
M 6
9/21
/200
01.
1860
0.90
631.
1470
2.31
400.
6502
12/7
/200
02.
1547
1.51
231.
6205
5.31
071.
6719
3/8/
2001
6.41
185.
1028
2.72
308.
3900
3.18
957/
12/2
001
2.79
263.
7337
3.11
495.
5419
2.82
56
Mea
n As
h Fr
ee D
ry W
eigh
t (g/
m2 )
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
2000
-200
1
0.00
00
2.00
00
4.00
00
6.00
00
8.00
00
10.0
000
12.0
000
Waltervi
lle R
M 20.5 Bell
ingers
RM 18
.5Moh
awk RM 14
Harves
t RM 10
Armita
ge R
M 6
g/m2
9/21
/200
0
12/7
/200
0
3/8/
2001
7/12
/200
1
McK
en
zie
Riv
er
2000
-200
1
0.00
00
1.00
00
2.00
00
3.00
00
4.00
00
5.00
00
6.00
00
7.00
00
8.00
00
9.00
00
Walte
rville
RM 20
.5Bell
inger
s RM
18.5
Mohawk R
M 14
Harve
st RM 10
Armita
ge R
M 6
g/m2
9/21
/200
0
12/7
/200
0
3/8/
2001
7/12
/200
1
F
igur
e 3.
86 M
cKen
zie
Riv
er B
enth
ic M
acro
inve
rtebr
ate
M
ean
Dry
Bio
mas
s
Fi
gure
3.8
7 M
cKen
zie
Riv
er B
enth
ic M
acro
inve
rtebr
ate
Mea
n A
sh- F
ree
Dry
Bio
mas
s
106 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Wal
terv
ille
RM
20.5
Gas
tropo
da11
%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra11
%
Tric
ladi
da2%
Cole
opte
ra4%
Chiro
nom
idae
7%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra4%
Hydr
acar
ina
5%O
ligoc
haet
a6%
Tric
hopt
era
20%
Plec
opte
ra30
%
Bel
linge
rs R
M18
.5
Gas
tropo
da1%
Hydr
acar
ina
3%O
ligoc
haet
a5%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra5%
Chiro
nom
idae
9%
Cole
opte
ra4%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra15
%
Plec
opte
ra25
%
Tric
hopt
era
32%
Figu
re 3
.88
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e Fa
mily
Dis
tribu
tion
by P
erce
nt D
ry W
eigh
t for
the
McK
enzi
e R
iver
Sam
plin
g Si
tes U
pstre
am o
f Mill
D
isch
arge
, Stu
dy Y
ear 2
000
to 2
001
(rep
rese
nts t
he su
m o
f all
repl
icat
es a
nd se
ason
al sa
mpl
es fo
r the
ent
ire st
udy
year
for a
ll fa
mili
es
cont
ribut
ing
>1%
of t
he to
tal)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 107
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Moh
awk
RM
14Ch
irono
mid
ae6%
Tric
ladi
da4% Tr
icho
pter
a33
%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra4%
Hydr
oida
19%G
astro
poda
16%
Cole
opte
ra6%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra3%
Plec
opte
ra4% O
ligoc
haet
a5%
Hydr
acar
ina
1%
Har
vest
RM
10
Plec
opte
ra13
%
Chiro
nom
idae
10%
Hydr
acar
ina
2%O
ligoc
haet
a10
%
Hydr
oida
1%Gas
tropo
da3%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra2%
Cole
opte
ra3%
Tric
ladi
da1%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra18
%
Tric
hopt
era
36%
Arm
itage
RM
6Co
leop
tera
5%
Olig
ocha
eta
17%
Chiro
nom
idae
13%
Tric
ladi
da2%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra3%
Tric
hopt
era
20%
Plec
opte
ra13
%Ep
hem
erop
tera
16% G
astro
poda
5%Hy
droi
da3%
Hydr
acar
ina
3%
Figu
re 3
.89
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e Fa
mily
Dis
tribu
tion
by P
erce
nt D
ry W
eigh
t for
the
McK
enzi
e R
iver
Sam
plin
g Si
tes D
owns
tream
of M
ill
Dis
char
ge, S
tudy
Yea
r 200
0 to
200
1 (r
epre
sent
s the
sum
of a
ll re
plic
ates
and
seas
onal
sam
ples
for t
he e
ntire
stud
y ye
ar fo
r all
fam
ilies
co
ntrib
utin
g >1
% o
f the
tota
l)
108 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 109
3.8.4 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrates
Table 3.28 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Order Family Genus Species Cor
valli
s R
M12
8W
illam
ette
R
M13
4Sn
ag B
oat
RM
143.
5Sa
m D
aws
RM
145.
5In
take
R
M14
8C
artn
ey
RM
156
Har
risbu
rg
RM
160
Whi
tely
R
M17
6
Amphipoda Gammaridae x xGammarus x
Coleoptera x x xDytiscidae x x
Oreodytes xElmidae x x
Cleptelmis xDubiraphia xGonielmis xNarpus xOptioservus xOrdobrevia x
nubriferaRhizelmis nigraStenelmis xZaitzevia x
Haliplidae x xBrychius xHalipus x
Hydrophilidae x xHydrobius x
Diptera x x xCeratopogonidae x x
Culicoides xChironomidae Ablabesmyia x
mallochirhamphe gr.
Brillia flavifronsCardiocladius xChironomus xCladotanytarsus x
mancus gr.vanderwulpi gr. Avanderwulpi gr. B
Conchapelopia xfasciata gr.
Corynoneura xCricotopus x
bicinctuscf. sylvestrissp. Bsp. Ctrifascia
Cricotopus/Orthocladius gr. xCryptochironomus x
cf. sorexDemichryptochironomus xDiamesa xDicrotendipes x
fumidusneomodestus
Doncricotopus bicaudatusEndochironomus xEukiefferiella x
brehmi gr.claripennis gr.coerulescens gr.devonica gr.
(Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 110
Table 3.28 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Cor
valli
s R
M12
8W
illam
ette
R
M13
4Sn
ag B
oat
RM
143.
5Sa
m D
aws
RM
145.
5In
take
R
M14
8C
artn
ey
RM
156
Har
risbu
rg
RM
160
Whi
tely
R
M17
6
Diptera Chironomidae Eukiefferiella pseudomontana gr.Euryhapsis xHeleniella xHeterotrissocladius marcidus gr.Limnophyes xMicropsectra x
sp. Asp. B
Microtendipes xpedellus gr.
Monodiamesa xNanocladius x
crassicornisdistinctusrectinervis
Nilotanypus fimbriatusNilothauma xNimbocera x
sp. Asp. B
Orthocladius xasheiashei/rivicolacarlatusluteipesmallochirivicolarivulorumsp. Asp. Bsp. C
Pagastia particasp. A
Parachironomus xcf. tenuicaudatus
Paracladopelma undineParakiefferiella xParametriocnemus xParatanytarsus x
tenellulus gr.Pentaneura xPhaenopsectra x
obediens gr.punctipes gr.
Polypedilum xavicepsfallaxflavumillinoense gr.laetumscalaenumtritum
Potthastia xgaedii gr.longimana
Procladius xPseudochironomus xPseudosmittia xRheocricotopus eminellobus
robackiRheotanytarsus xRobackia x
demeijerei (Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 111
Table 3.28 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Cor
valli
s R
M12
8W
illam
ette
R
M13
4Sn
ag B
oat
RM
143.
5Sa
m D
aws
RM
145.
5In
take
R
M14
8C
artn
ey
RM
156
Har
risbu
rg
RM
160
Whi
tely
R
M17
6
Diptera Chironomidae Stempellinella xStilocladius xStictochironomus xSublettea x
coffmaniSynorthocladius x
semivirensTanytarsus x
curticornis gr.eminulus gr.gregarius & lugens gr.pallidicornis&aculeatus gr.sp. Dsp. J
Thienemanniella xThienemannimyia gr. xTvetenia bavarica gr.
discoloripes gr.Xenochironomus xenolabis
Dolichopodidae x xEmpididae Chelifera x
Hemerodromia xEphydridae x xLimoniidae Erioptera xSimuliidae x x
Prosimulium xSimulium x
Tabanidae x xTanyderidae Protanyderus xTipulidae x x
Antocha xEphemeroptera Ameletidae Ameletus velox
Baetidae x xAcentrella x
insignificansturbida
Baetis xtricaudatus
Diphetor hageniProcloeon x
Caenidae Caenis xlatipennis
Ephemerellidae x xAttenella x
margaritaCaudatella heterocaudataEphemerella aurivilli
inermisinfrequens
Eurylophella xlodi
Serratella xlevis
Heptageniidae x xEpeorus albertaeNixe x
criddleiRithrogena x
hageniStenonema x
terminatum (Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 112
Table 3.28 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Cor
valli
s R
M12
8W
illam
ette
R
M13
4Sn
ag B
oat
RM
143.
5Sa
m D
aws
RM
145.
5In
take
R
M14
8C
artn
ey
RM
156
Har
risbu
rg
RM
160
Whi
tely
R
M17
6
Ephemeroptera Leptophlebiidae Asioplax xedmundsi
Paraleptophebia xbicornutavaciva
Tricorythodes xminutus
Potamanthidae Anthopotamus xGastropoda x x x
Ancylidae x xHydrobiidae x x
Amnicola xPhysidae Physella xPlanorbidae x x
Gyraulus xVorticifex effusa
Pleuroceridae Juga xhemphilliplicifera
Hemiptera Corixidae x xHirudinea x x x
Glossiphoniidae Deserobdella xpicta
Hydracarina x x xHydroida Hydridae Hydra xIsopoda Asellidae x x
Caecidotea xLepidoptera Pyralidae x x
Petrophila xOdonata Coenagrionidae x x
Gomphidae x xOphiogomphus x
Oligochaeta x x xPelecypoda x x x
Sphaeriidae x xPlecoptera x x x
Capniidae x xChloroperlidae x x
Neaviperla forcipataSuwallia x
Leuctridae Despaxia augustaPerlidae x x
Calineuria californicaClaassenia x
sabulosaPerlodidae x x
Isogenoides xIsoperla type A
type CSkwala x
Taeniopterygidae Taenionema xTaeniopteryx nivalis
Trichoptera x x xBrachycentridae Amiocentrus aspilus
Brachycentrus xoccidentalis
Glossosomatidae Glossosoma xProtoptila x
Goeridae Goera archaonHydropsychidae x x
Cheumatopsyche xHydropsyche x
(Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 113
Table 3.28 Continued
Order Family Genus Species Cor
valli
s R
M12
8W
illam
ette
R
M13
4Sn
ag B
oat
RM
143.
5Sa
m D
aws
RM
145.
5In
take
R
M14
8C
artn
ey
RM
156
Har
risbu
rg
RM
160
Whi
tely
R
M17
6
Trichoptera Hydroptillidae x xHydroptila xLeucotrichia pictipes
Lepidostomatidae Lepidostoma xLeptoceridae x x
Ceraclea xMystacides x
alafimbriataLimnephilidae x x
Dicosmoecus gilvipesMolannidae x xPolycentropodidae Polycentropus xPsychomyiidae Psychomyia x
flavidaRhyacophilidae Rhyacophila type B
type CTricladida x x x
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 114
Table 3.29 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001
Date Site Total # Taxa % EPT1
% Chironomidae
% Diptera
Total Abundance (count/site)
September 2000 Corvallis RM128 71 1.9 66.9 67.7 2536September 2000 Willamette RM134 72 15.6 76.2 76.4 4734September 2000 Snag Boat RM143.5 46 7.6 55.1 55.3 2440September 2000 Sam Daws RM 145.5 64 4.5 89.9 90.2 3053September 2000 Intake RM148 65 6.2 65.3 65.5 3836September 2000 Cartney RM156 51 5.0 83.0 83.0 4153September 2000 Harrisburg RM160 60 6.0 92.7 92.7 6375September 2000 Whitely RM176 55 2.8 67.3 67.5 2575
December 2000 Corvallis RM128 53 11.8 33.7 35.2 1461December 2000 Willamette RM134 60 13.6 71.1 72.3 1174December 2000 Snag Boat RM143.5 40 9.8 51.6 52.1 407December 2000 Sam Daws RM 145.5 61 21.8 66.8 68.6 1638December 2000 Intake RM148 61 35.3 38.8 40.8 1357December 2000 Cartney RM156 60 20.2 49.5 49.8 1694December 2000 Harrisburg RM160 59 17.6 75.8 77.1 2882December 2000 Whitely RM176 56 25.9 25.4 30.2 1112
March 2001 Corvallis RM128 64 6.2 63.1 63.9 2427March 2001 Willamette RM134 69 23.7 68.9 70.2 3083March 2001 Snag Boat RM143.5 55 12.3 77.3 78.4 1960March 2001 Sam Daws RM 145.5 75 14.4 68.2 69.1 4245March 2001 Intake RM148 74 24.6 69.6 70.5 7565March 2001 Cartney RM156 68 41.0 50.4 51.1 4429March 2001 Harrisburg RM160 68 38.7 53.9 54.6 5817March 2001 Whitely RM176 66 7.8 81.5 82.4 4242
July 2001 Corvallis RM128 68 20.1 48.0 48.8 4917July 2001 Willamette RM134 93 20.3 63.7 63.9 7700July 2001 Snag Boat RM143.5 62 16.4 56.5 56.6 5831July 2001 Sam Daws RM 145.5 82 14.8 67.3 67.5 10940July 2001 Intake RM148 80 34.0 46.2 46.8 7073July 2001 Cartney RM156 78 20.7 60.4 60.5 7304July 2001 Harrisburg RM160 83 41.0 39.2 39.2 4209July 2001 Whitely RM176 82 15.9 51.7 52.2 9425 1 EPT = Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera taxa
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.30
Will
amet
te R
iver
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e B
iom
ass,
Stud
y Y
ear 2
000
to 2
001(
mea
ns fo
r 5 re
plic
ates
)
Cor
vallis
R
M12
8W
illam
ette
R
M13
4Sn
ag B
oat
RM
143.
5Sa
m D
aws
RM
145.
5In
take
R
M14
8C
artn
ey
RM
156
Har
risbu
rg
RM
160
Whi
tely
R
M17
69/
19/2
000
13.2
049
5.43
261.
3070
1.61
441.
9528
2.43
161.
5526
1.46
6312
/5/2
000
30.5
023
5.14
121.
3479
3.51
533.
1919
2.66
191.
9574
2.69
473/
6/20
018.
2444
7.65
331.
9533
4.43
478.
1558
5.11
587.
0991
2.98
077/
10/2
001
7.05
336.
7116
2.97
915.
7593
7.10
703.
9621
5.81
6310
.250
9
Mea
n D
ry W
eigh
t (g/
m2 )
Cor
vallis
R
M12
8W
illam
ette
R
M13
4S
nag
Boa
t R
M14
3.5
Sam
Daw
s R
M14
5.5
Inta
ke
RM
148
Car
tney
R
M15
6H
arris
burg
R
M16
0W
hite
ly
RM
176
9/19
/200
05.
3430
2.08
650.
8226
1.04
560.
9119
1.50
560.
9516
0.72
8412
/5/2
000
6.48
950.
7916
0.75
371.
5563
1.60
671.
0077
1.03
300.
9000
3/6/
2001
2.38
163.
2479
0.89
402.
8251
6.05
843.
3563
5.31
141.
5870
7/10
/200
12.
4065
3.55
281.
0740
2.96
214.
6593
2.12
582.
7074
7.01
56
Mea
n A
sh F
ree
Dry
Wei
ght (
g/m
2 )
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
0.00
00
2.00
00
4.00
00
6.00
00
8.00
00
10.0
000
12.0
000
14.0
000
Corvall
is RM12
8Willa
mette R
M134
Snag Boa
t RM14
3.5
Sam D
aws R
M145.5 Int
ake R
M148
Cartne
y RM156
Harrisb
urg R
M160 White
ly RM17
6
g/m2
9/19
/200
0
12/5
/200
0
3/6/
2001
7/10
/200
1
Will
amet
te R
iver
200
0 to
200
1
0.00
00
1.00
00
2.00
00
3.00
00
4.00
00
5.00
00
6.00
00
7.00
00
8.00
00
Corvallis
RM12
8
Willamett
e RM13
4
Snag B
oat R
M143.5
Sam D
aws R
M145.5 Int
ake R
M148Cartn
ey R
M156
Harrisbu
rg RM16
0White
ly RM176
g/m2
9/19
/200
0
12/5
/200
0
3/6/
2001
7/10
/200
1
Fi
gure
3.9
0 W
illam
ette
Riv
er B
enth
ic M
acro
inve
rtebr
ate
Fig
ure
3.91
Will
amet
te R
iver
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e
M
ean
Dry
Bio
mas
s
Mea
n A
sh-F
ree
Dry
Bio
mas
s
Technical Bulletin No. 868 115
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Whi
tely
RM
176
Ephe
mer
opte
ra6%
Gas
tropo
da7%
Pele
cypo
da3%
Plec
opte
ra1%
Tric
ladi
da5%
Cole
opte
ra4%
Am
phip
oda
4%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra3%
Hiru
dine
a2%
Hydr
oida
1%Hy
drac
arin
a4%
Lepi
dopt
era
4%
Olig
ocha
eta
12%
Tric
hopt
era
35%
Chiro
nom
idae
10%
Har
risbu
rg R
M16
0
Am
phip
oda
2%
Cole
opte
ra4%
Tric
ladi
da0%
Plec
opte
ra15
%Tr
icho
pter
a19
%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra20
%
Chiro
nom
idae
13%
Olig
ocha
eta
8%Le
pido
pter
a2%
Hydr
acar
ina
3%
Hiru
dine
a1%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra2%
Hydr
oida
2%
Gas
tropo
da8%
Car
tney
RM
156
Olig
ocha
eta
11%Hi
rudi
nea
1%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra2%
Plec
opte
ra10
%
Pele
cypo
da1%
Gas
tropo
da2%
Hydr
oida
3% Hydr
acar
ina
4%Le
pido
pter
a3%
Odo
nata
1%
Cole
opte
ra6%
Am
phip
oda
5%
Tric
hopt
era
17%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra20
%
Chiro
nom
idae
14%
Inta
ke R
M14
8
Olig
ocha
eta
13%
Pele
cypo
da3%
Am
phip
oda
3%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra2%
Plec
opte
ra15
%
Cole
opte
ra4%
Chiro
nom
idae
12%
Tric
ladi
da2%
Hydr
oida
1%
Hydr
acar
ina
3%
Gas
tropo
da1%
Tric
hopt
era
24%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra18
%
Figu
re 3
.92
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e Fa
mily
Dis
tribu
tion
by P
erce
nt D
ry W
eigh
t for
the
Will
amet
te R
iver
Sam
plin
g Si
tes U
pstre
am o
f Mill
D
isch
arge
, Stu
dy Y
ear 2
000
to 2
001
(rep
rese
nts t
he su
m o
f all
repl
icat
es a
nd se
ason
al sa
mpl
es fo
r the
ent
ire st
udy
year
for a
ll fa
mili
es
cont
ribut
ing
>1%
of t
he to
tal)
116 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Sam
Daw
s R
M14
5.5
Am
phip
oda
5%
Pele
cypo
da2%
Gas
tropo
da7%
Hiru
dine
a1%
Hydr
oida
3%
Hydr
acar
ina
4%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra3%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra13
%
Cole
opte
ra5%
Chiro
nom
idae
19%
Olig
ocha
eta
18%
Plec
opte
ra10
%Tr
icho
pter
a8%
Snag
Boa
t RM
143.
5
Oth
er D
ipte
ra2%
Tric
hopt
era
5%
Pele
cypo
da2%
Hydr
acar
ina
6%
Hydr
oida
1%
Gas
tropo
da5%
Cole
opte
ra7%
Am
phip
oda
6%
Tric
ladi
da3%
Plec
opte
ra3%
Olig
ocha
eta
8%
Hem
ipte
ra2%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra36
%
Chiro
nom
idae
14%
Will
amet
te P
ark
RM
134
Am
phip
oda
3%
Tric
ladi
da1%
Tric
hopt
era
13%
Oth
er D
ipte
ra3%
Hydr
oida
1%Hi
rudi
nea
2%
Plec
opte
ra4%
Pele
cypo
da7%
Lepi
dopt
era
1%O
ligoc
haet
a5%
Hydr
acar
ina
2%
Gas
tropo
da25
%
Cole
opte
ra3%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra11
%
Chiro
nom
idae
17%
Cor
valli
s R
M12
8
Am
phip
oda
4% Chiro
nom
idae
2%
Tric
hopt
era
2%
Tric
ladi
da1%
Ephe
mer
opte
ra6%
Olig
ocha
eta
7%
Gas
tropo
da77
%
Figu
re 3
.93
Ben
thic
Mac
roin
verte
brat
e Fa
mily
Dis
tribu
tion
by P
erce
nt D
ry W
eigh
t for
the
Will
amet
te R
iver
Sam
plin
g Si
tes D
owns
tream
of M
ill
Dis
char
ge, S
tudy
Yea
r 200
0 to
200
1 (r
epre
sent
s the
sum
of a
ll re
plic
ates
and
seas
onal
sam
ples
for t
he e
ntire
stud
y ye
ar fo
r all
fam
ilies
co
ntrib
utin
g >1
% o
f the
tota
l)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 117
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 118
3.9 Fish
Fish on Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River were sampled under a three-year research agreement with Western Washington University (WWU), Bellingham, Washington, starting in the fall of 1998. The experimental design provided by WWU examined different fish habitats along the LTRWS area for fish communities. Sampling was done using electrofishing techniques on a quarterly basis. All fish sampling was done by WWU personnel, along with one or more NCASI personnel. When time and conditions allowed, fish were identified, measured, and weighed on site, then returned to the river. Otherwise, they were frozen and transported back to WWU for later examination.
Codorus Creek, a wadeable stream, had a design that called for backpack electrofishing at each of the established NCASI macroinvertebrate and periphyton sites, along with one added site, Indian Rock Dam, for a total of eight fish sampling sites. Shocking was done in three runs of approximately 600 s each. The data were not normalized to shock time. There were three missing samples for the November 2000 sampling date: East Branch, USGS, and Furnace.
The Leaf River, a wide, unregulated river, had a design that sampled for fish annually during the fall, the historically low flow season. The experimental design called for boat electroshocking at six sites, two upstream, and four downstream of the mill effluent discharge. Boat electrofishing was done as one continuous run for approximately 30 min. at each site. Boat electrofishing on the Leaf River was conducted with assistance from the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks. Backpack electrofishing was initiated on the Leaf River in October 2000, and was carried out at five of the six designated sites, each with one run of approximately 10 min. The data were not normalized to shock time. Due to low flow conditions, Tallahala, the most upstream site, was not sampled. All fish were identified, measured, and weighed on site, then returned to the river.
For the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers, both large fast moving rivers, the design focused on boat electrofishing at different areas within the LTRWS area at or near NCASI macroinvertebrate and periphyton sites. The McKenzie River had five sampling sites, and the Willamette had six sampling sites for boat electrofishing. Boat electrofishing was carried out as two runs of approximately 250 m each. Due to sampling permit issues that took effect in January 2001, boat electrofishing data is available only for the September 2000 sampling date. Boat electrofishing at Intake (RM 148.5) on the Willamette River, and Bellingers (RM 18.5) on the McKenzie River was not carried out during the 2000 to 2001 study year. Supplemental near-shore backpack electrofishing was included at sites where the bank was accessible. Backpack electrofishing was carried out at four sites on the McKenzie River and six sites on the Willamette River as three runs of approximately 600 s at each site. Backpack electrofishing data are available only for the September 2000, December 2000 and July 2001 sampling dates; data for the March 2000 sampling date were lost. There were four missing samples for the December 2000 sampling date: Harvest and Armitage on the McKenzie River, and Whitely and Willamette Park on the Willamette River. Data were also lost for the June 2001 sampling of Cartney on the Willamette River. Data in this compendium were not normalized for time or distance.
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
3.9.
1.
Cod
orus
Cre
ek F
ish
Tab
le 3
.31
Cod
orus
Cre
ek: E
ast B
ranc
h B
ackp
ack
Fish
Dat
a Su
mm
ary
for A
ugus
t 200
0 to
June
200
1 E
AS
T B
RA
NC
HS
ampl
ing
Dat
e/#
of ru
ns =
3
Run
s3
Run
s2
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suc
kers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Whi
te s
ucke
rC
atos
tom
us c
omm
erso
ni45
21.0
366
.02
3.19
1313
.27
95.3
89.
3425
17.1
210
6.56
17.6
3N
orth
ern
hogs
ucke
rH
ypen
teliu
m n
igric
ans
20.
9340
.00
0.50
0.00
32.
0569
.00
4.13
Sun
fish
(Cen
trar
chid
ae):
Roc
k ba
ssA
mbl
oplit
es ru
pest
ris0.
000.
000.
00Le
pom
isLe
pom
is0.
000.
000.
00R
edbr
east
sun
fish
Lepo
mis
aur
itus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Gre
en s
unfis
hLe
pom
is c
yane
llus
20.
9387
.00
12.8
90.
000.
00P
umpk
inse
edLe
pom
is g
ibbo
sus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Blu
egill
Lepo
mis
mac
roch
irus
0.00
0.00
10.
6871
.00
6.95
Red
ear s
unfis
hLe
pom
is m
icro
loph
us0.
000.
000.
00S
mal
lmou
th b
ass
Mic
ropt
erus
dol
omie
ui0.
000.
000.
00La
rgem
outh
bas
sM
icro
pter
us s
alm
oide
s0.
000.
000.
00
Scu
lpin
s (C
ottid
ae):
Slim
y sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s co
gnat
us0.
000.
000.
00R
iffle
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
gulo
sus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Car
ps &
min
now
s (C
ypri
nida
e):
Cen
tral s
tone
rolle
rC
ampo
stom
a an
omal
um0.
001
1.02
75.0
04.
292
1.37
86.0
09.
68R
osys
ide
dace
Clin
osto
mus
fund
uloi
des
0.00
1111
.22
50.2
71.
484
2.74
92.7
58.
85S
atin
fin s
hine
rC
yprin
ella
ana
lost
anus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Spo
tfin
shin
erC
yprin
ella
spi
lopt
erus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Com
mon
car
pC
yprin
us c
arpi
o Li
nnae
us0.
000.
000.
00C
utlip
s m
inno
wE
xogl
ossu
m m
axill
ingu
a8
3.74
71.1
33.
851
1.02
110.
0016
.98
32.
0565
.00
3.86
Com
mon
shi
ner
Luxi
lus
corn
utus
177.
9485
.12
6.11
1414
.29
88.1
47.
344
2.74
88.5
010
.07
Gol
den
shin
erN
otem
igon
us c
ryso
leuc
as0.
000.
000.
00S
potta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s hu
dson
ius
0.00
44.
0853
.00
1.13
0.00
Sw
allo
wta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s pr
ocne
2411
.21
53.1
31.
4715
15.3
163
.73
3.53
0.00
Blu
ntno
se m
inno
wP
imep
hale
s no
tatu
s0.
000.
001
0.68
84.0
07.
15D
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
0.00
0.00
0.00
Bla
ckno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
atra
tulu
s50
23.3
652
.38
1.46
2121
.43
46.4
31.
1816
10.9
653
.87
1.65
Long
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys c
atar
acta
e12
5.61
66.2
53.
365
5.10
66.4
03.
4412
8.22
60.5
82.
51C
reek
chu
bS
emot
ilus
atro
mac
ulat
us40
18.6
972
.48
4.64
44.
0870
.25
4.04
128.
2288
.91
8.81
Fallf
ish
Sem
otilu
s co
rpor
alis
20.
9310
2.50
12.1
00.
001
0.68
150.
0044
.00
Cyp
rinid
0.00
0.00
1610
.96
67.6
04.
24
08/2
2/00
03/2
4/01
06/0
9/01
(C
ontin
ued
on n
ext p
age)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 119
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.31
Con
tinue
d E
AS
T B
RA
NC
H-c
ontin
ued Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
2 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Bul
lhea
d ca
tfish
es (I
ctal
urid
ae):
Yello
w b
ullh
ead
Am
eiur
us n
atal
is0.
000.
000.
00M
argi
ned
mad
tom
Not
urus
insi
gnis
0.00
33.
0611
7.33
14.8
70.
00
Topm
inno
ws
& K
illifi
shes
(Fun
dulid
ae):
Ban
ded
killif
ish
Fund
ulus
dia
phan
us0.
000.
000.
00
Perc
hes
& d
arte
rs (P
erci
dae)
:G
reen
side
dar
ter
Eth
eost
oma
blen
nioi
des
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tess
ella
ted
darte
rE
theo
stom
a ol
mst
edi
125.
6150
.17
1.11
66.
1252
.33
1.58
74.
7956
.43
1.72
Ban
ded
darte
rE
theo
stom
a zo
nale
0.00
0.00
10.
6861
.00
2.20
Shi
eld
darte
rP
erci
na p
elta
ta0.
000.
000.
00D
arte
r0.
000.
000.
00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):R
ainb
ow tr
out
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s0.
000.
004
2.74
296.
5027
6.25
Bro
wn
trout
Sal
mo
trutta
0.
000.
006
4.11
238.
1716
6.67
Fish
:U
nide
ntifi
ed
0.00
0.00
2819
.18
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
214
9814
6
08/2
2/00
03/2
4/01
06/0
9/01
120 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.32
Cod
orus
Cre
ek: M
enge
s Bac
kpac
k Fi
sh D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Aug
ust 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
MEN
GES
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
1 R
un3
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
0.00
Whi
te s
ucke
rC
atos
tom
us c
omm
erso
ni14
24.5
645
.79
1.03
28.
0029
0.50
284.
000.
0027
46.5
526
5.19
256.
83N
orth
ern
hogs
ucke
rH
ypen
teliu
m n
igric
ans
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sunf
ish
(Cen
trar
chid
ae):
Roc
k ba
ssA
mbl
oplit
es ru
pest
ris0.
000.
000.
000.
00Le
pom
isLe
pom
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00R
edbr
east
sun
fish
Lepo
mis
aur
itus
0.00
0.00
1168
.75
83.6
410
.64
0.00
Gre
en s
unfis
hLe
pom
is c
yane
llus
3663
.16
43.1
71.
880.
000.
0010
17.2
474
.70
13.3
2Pu
mpk
inse
edLe
pom
is g
ibbo
sus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Blue
gill
Lepo
mis
mac
roch
irus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Red
ear s
unfis
hLe
pom
is m
icro
loph
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00Sm
allm
outh
bas
sM
icro
pter
us d
olom
ieui
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Larg
emou
th b
ass
Mic
ropt
erus
sal
moi
des
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):Sl
imy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cogn
atus
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.
7210
9.00
19.3
6R
iffle
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
gulo
sus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Car
ps &
min
now
s (C
yprin
idae
):C
entra
l sto
nero
ller
Cam
post
oma
anom
alum
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Ros
ysid
e da
ceC
linos
tom
us fu
ndul
oide
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00Sa
tinfin
shi
ner
Cyp
rinel
la a
nalo
stan
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00Sp
otfin
shi
ner
Cyp
rinel
la s
pilo
pter
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00C
omm
on c
arp
Cyp
rinus
car
pio
Linn
aeus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cut
lips
min
now
Exo
glos
sum
max
illing
ua0.
000.
000.
000.
00C
omm
on s
hine
rLu
xilu
s co
rnut
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00G
olde
n sh
iner
Not
emig
onus
cry
sole
ucas
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Spot
tail
shin
erN
otro
pis
huds
oniu
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00Sw
allo
wta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s pr
ocne
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Blun
tnos
e m
inno
wP
imep
hale
s no
tatu
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00D
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Blac
knos
e da
ceR
hini
chth
ys a
tratu
lus
35.
2640
.33
0.61
0.00
0.00
11.
7249
.00
1.16
Long
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys c
atar
acta
e2
3.51
65.5
03.
880.
000.
000.
00C
reek
chu
bS
emot
ilus
atro
mac
ulat
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00Fa
llfis
hS
emot
ilus
corp
oral
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00C
yprin
id0.
000.
000.
000.
00
08/2
2/00
11/1
7/00
03/1
1/01
06/0
9/01
(C
ontin
ued
on n
ext p
age)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 121
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.32
Con
tinue
d M
ENG
ES-c
ontin
ued
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
1 R
un3
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Bul
lhea
d ca
tfish
es (I
ctal
urid
ae):
Yello
w b
ullh
ead
Am
eiur
us n
atal
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00M
argi
ned
mad
tom
Not
urus
insi
gnis
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Topm
inno
ws
& K
illifi
shes
(Fun
dulid
ae):
Band
ed k
illifis
hFu
ndul
us d
iaph
anus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perc
hes
& d
arte
rs (P
erci
dae)
:G
reen
side
dar
ter
Eth
eost
oma
blen
nioi
des
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tess
ella
ted
darte
rE
theo
stom
a ol
mst
edi
23.
5149
.00
1.79
0.00
0.00
0.00
Band
ed d
arte
rE
theo
stom
a zo
nale
0.00
0.00
16.
2554
.00
-0.
00Sh
ield
dar
ter
Per
cina
pel
tata
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Dar
ter
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):R
ainb
ow tr
out
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00Br
own
trout
Sal
mo
trutta
0.
0023
92.0
019
1.30
82.7
44
25.0
019
3.00
76.0
019
.032
.76
249.
6817
9.47
Fish
:U
nide
ntifi
ed0.
000.
000.
000.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
5725
1658
08/2
2/00
11/1
7/00
03/1
1/01
06/0
9/01
122 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.33
Cod
orus
Cre
ek: U
SGS
Bac
kpac
k Fi
sh D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Aug
ust 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
US
GS
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
2 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Whi
te s
ucke
rC
atos
tom
us c
omm
erso
ni1
1.22
61.0
01.
660.
002
4.88
208.
5010
7.50
Nor
ther
n ho
gsuc
ker
Hyp
ente
lium
nig
rican
s0.
001
0.75
79.0
04.
820.
00
Sunf
ish
(Cen
trar
chid
ae):
Roc
k ba
ssA
mbl
oplit
es ru
pest
ris0.
000.
000.
00Le
pom
isLe
pom
is0.
000.
000.
00R
edbr
east
sun
fish
Lepo
mis
aur
itus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Gre
en s
unfis
hLe
pom
is c
yane
llus
0.00
10.
7512
3.00
39.0
11
2.44
140.
0064
.00
Pum
pkin
seed
Lepo
mis
gib
bosu
s0.
000.
004
9.76
81.0
010
.80
Blu
egill
Lepo
mis
mac
roch
irus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Red
ear s
unfis
hLe
pom
is m
icro
loph
us0.
000.
000.
00S
mal
lmou
th b
ass
Mic
ropt
erus
dol
omie
ui0.
000.
000.
00La
rgem
outh
bas
sM
icro
pter
us s
alm
oide
s2
2.44
61.0
02.
940.
001
2.44
-1.
46
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):S
limy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cogn
atus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Riff
le s
culp
inC
ottu
s gu
losu
s0.
000.
000.
00
Car
ps &
min
now
s (C
yprin
idae
):C
entra
l sto
nero
ller
Cam
post
oma
anom
alum
0.00
0.00
12.
4473
.00
3.68
Ros
ysid
e da
ceC
linos
tom
us fu
ndul
oide
s3
3.66
53.3
31.
670.
000.
00S
atin
fin s
hine
rC
yprin
ella
ana
lost
anus
0.00
53.
7667
.20
3.22
0.00
Spo
tfin
shin
erC
yprin
ella
spi
lopt
erus
0.00
10.
7548
.00
0.78
37.
3271
.67
3.95
Com
mon
car
pC
yprin
us c
arpi
o Li
nnae
us0.
000.
001
2.44
640.
00-
Cut
lips
min
now
Exo
glos
sum
max
illing
ua0.
000.
000.
00C
omm
on s
hine
rLu
xilu
s co
rnut
us0.
000.
000.
00G
olde
n sh
iner
Not
emig
onus
cry
sole
ucas
0.00
0.00
0.00
Spo
ttail
shin
erN
otro
pis
huds
oniu
s49
59.7
658
.20
2.03
86.
0248
.13
0.90
0.00
Sw
allo
wta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s pr
ocne
11.
2240
.00
0.40
100
75.1
949
.68
0.98
0.00
Blu
ntno
se m
inno
wP
imep
hale
s no
tatu
s0.
000.
002
4.88
81.0
05.
81D
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
0.00
0.00
0.00
Bla
ckno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
atra
tulu
s0.
000.
000.
00Lo
ngno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
cat
arac
tae
44.
8872
.25
5.23
0.00
37.
3274
.00
4.73
Cre
ek c
hub
Sem
otilu
s at
rom
acul
atus
0.00
10.
7512
4.00
78.7
21
2.44
117.
0022
.55
Fallf
ish
Sem
otilu
s co
rpor
alis
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cyp
rinid
0.00
96.
7742
.67
0.50
21.0
51.2
259
.57
1.99
08/2
2/00
03/2
4/01
06/0
9/01
(C
ontin
ued
on n
ext p
age)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 123
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.33
Con
tinue
d U
SG
S-co
ntin
ued
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
2 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Bul
lhea
d ca
tfish
es (I
ctal
urid
ae):
Yello
w b
ullh
ead
Am
eiur
us n
atal
is0.
000.
000.
00M
argi
ned
mad
tom
Not
urus
insi
gnis
0.00
0.00
0.00
Topm
inno
ws
& K
illifi
shes
(Fun
dulid
ae):
Ban
ded
killi
fish
Fund
ulus
dia
phan
us0.
000.
000.
00
Perc
hes
& d
arte
rs (P
erci
dae)
:G
reen
side
dar
ter
Eth
eost
oma
blen
nioi
des
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tess
ella
ted
darte
rE
theo
stom
a ol
mst
edi
2226
.83
56.0
91.
927
5.26
58.4
32.
551.
02.
4459
.00
2.03
Ban
ded
darte
rE
theo
stom
a zo
nale
0.00
0.00
0.00
Shi
eld
darte
rP
erci
na p
elta
ta0.
000.
000.
00D
arte
r0.
000.
000.
00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):R
ainb
ow tr
out
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s0.
000.
000.
00B
row
n tro
utS
alm
o tru
tta
0.00
0.00
0.00
Fish
:U
nide
ntifi
ed0.
000.
000.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
8213
341
08/2
2/00
03/2
4/01
06/0
9/01
124 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.34
Cod
orus
Cre
ek: M
artin
Bac
kpac
k Fi
sh D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Aug
ust 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
MAR
TIN
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Whi
te s
ucke
rC
atos
tom
us c
omm
erso
ni0.
003
17.6
528
0.67
245.
335
4.67
78.8
04.
885
12.8
219
3.80
198.
55N
orth
ern
hogs
ucke
rH
ypen
teliu
m n
igric
ans
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sunf
ish
(Cen
trar
chid
ae):
Roc
k ba
ssA
mbl
oplit
es ru
pest
ris0.
000.
000.
000.
00Le
pom
isLe
pom
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00R
edbr
east
sun
fish
Lepo
mis
aur
itus
0.00
0.00
43.
7410
4.25
37.6
90.
00G
reen
sun
fish
Lepo
mis
cya
nellu
s0.
000.
007
6.54
120.
0043
.38
410
.26
115.
0037
.56
Pum
pkin
seed
Lepo
mis
gib
bosu
s0.
000.
002
1.87
67.0
05.
890.
00Bl
uegi
llLe
pom
is m
acro
chiru
s0.
000.
000.
001
2.56
59.0
03.
84R
edea
r sun
fish
Lepo
mis
mic
rolo
phus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Smal
lmou
th b
ass
Mic
ropt
erus
dol
omie
ui0.
000.
000.
000.
00La
rgem
outh
bas
sM
icro
pter
us s
alm
oide
s0.
000.
001
0.93
64.0
03.
924
10.2
626
0.50
362.
25
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):Sl
imy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cogn
atus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Riff
le s
culp
inC
ottu
s gu
losu
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Car
ps &
min
now
s (C
yprin
idae
):C
entra
l sto
nero
ller
Cam
post
oma
anom
alum
419
.05
103.
2512
.75
0.00
32.
8012
1.00
22.4
92
5.13
97.0
010
.96
Ros
ysid
e da
ceC
linos
tom
us fu
ndul
oide
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00Sa
tinfin
shi
ner
Cyp
rinel
la a
nalo
stan
us0.
000.
0039
36.4
568
.31
3.82
0.00
Spot
fin s
hine
rC
yprin
ella
spi
lopt
erus
0.00
0.00
2523
.36
67.7
63.
715
12.8
275
.00
5.50
Com
mon
car
pC
yprin
us c
arpi
o Li
nnae
us0.
000.
000.
003
7.69
536.
3324
68.6
3C
utlip
s m
inno
wE
xogl
ossu
m m
axilli
ngua
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Com
mon
shi
ner
Luxi
lus
corn
utus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Gol
den
shin
erN
otem
igon
us c
ryso
leuc
as0.
000.
000.
000.
00Sp
otta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s hu
dson
ius
14.
7694
.00
7.07
211
.76
91.5
05.
756
5.61
91.1
78.
9310
25.6
498
.30
10.3
3Sw
allo
wta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s pr
ocne
0.00
0.00
32.
8062
.67
2.86
0.00
Blun
tnos
e m
inno
wP
imep
hale
s no
tatu
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00D
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Blac
knos
e da
ceR
hini
chth
ys a
tratu
lus
419
.05
50.0
01.
328
47.0
652
.88
-9
8.41
62.3
32.
821
2.56
40.0
00.
62Lo
ngno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
cat
arac
tae
733
.33
75.5
75.
432
11.7
671
.00
-2
1.87
68.0
03.
401
2.56
81.0
06.
62C
reek
chu
bSe
mot
ilus
atro
mac
ulat
us1
4.76
56.0
01.
910.
000.
001
2.56
75.0
04.
73Fa
llfis
hSe
mot
ilus
corp
oral
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00C
yprin
id0.
000.
001
0.93
38.0
00.
410.
00
08/2
2/00
11/1
7/00
03/2
4/01
06/0
9/01
(C
ontin
ued
on n
ext p
age)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 125
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.34
Con
tinue
d M
ARTI
N-c
ontin
ued
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Bul
lhea
d ca
tfish
es (I
ctal
urid
ae):
Yel
low
bul
lhea
dA
mei
urus
nat
alis
419
.05
59.0
02.
731
5.88
173.
0065
.00
0.00
2.0
5.13
220.
0014
7.50
Mar
gine
d m
adto
mN
otur
us in
sign
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Topm
inno
ws
& K
illifi
shes
(Fun
dulid
ae):
Band
ed k
illifis
hFu
ndul
us d
iaph
anus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perc
hes
& d
arte
rs (P
erci
dae)
:G
reen
side
dar
ter
Eth
eost
oma
blen
nioi
des
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tess
ella
ted
darte
rE
theo
stom
a ol
mst
edi
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Band
ed d
arte
rE
theo
stom
a zo
nale
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Shi
eld
darte
rP
erci
na p
elta
ta0.
000.
000.
000.
00D
arte
r0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):R
ainb
ow tr
out
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00Br
own
trout
Sal
mo
trutta
0.
001
5.88
250.
0012
8.00
0.00
0.00
Fish
:U
nide
ntifi
ed0.
000.
000.
000.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
2117
107
39
08/2
2/00
11/1
7/00
03/2
4/01
06/0
9/01
126 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.35
Cod
orus
Cre
ek: G
rayb
ill B
ackp
ack
Fish
Dat
a Su
mm
ary
for A
ugus
t 200
0 to
June
200
1 G
RAY
BILL
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
2 R
uns
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Whi
te s
ucke
rC
atos
tom
us c
omm
erso
ni0.
009
23.0
832
6.11
381.
223
4.62
79.0
010
.64
412
.12
323.
0039
2.50
Nor
ther
n ho
gsuc
ker
Hyp
ente
lium
nig
rican
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Sunf
ish
(Cen
trar
chid
ae):
Roc
k ba
ssA
mbl
oplit
es ru
pest
ris0.
000.
000.
000.
00Le
pom
isLe
pom
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00R
edbr
east
sun
fish
Lepo
mis
aur
itus
0.00
512
.82
104.
8023
.24
913
.85
112.
8935
.38
618
.18
149.
6782
.17
Gre
en s
unfis
hLe
pom
is c
yane
llus
0.00
1128
.21
102.
0023
.29
57.
6910
4.00
25.5
114
42.4
210
6.43
29.3
6P
umpk
inse
edLe
pom
is g
ibbo
sus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Blue
gill
Lepo
mis
mac
roch
irus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Red
ear s
unfis
hLe
pom
is m
icro
loph
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00S
mal
lmou
th b
ass
Mic
ropt
erus
dol
omie
ui0.
000.
000.
000.
00La
rgem
outh
bas
sM
icro
pter
us s
alm
oide
s1
7.14
80.0
06.
830.
000.
000.
00
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):Sl
imy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cogn
atus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Riff
le s
culp
inC
ottu
s gu
losu
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Car
ps &
min
now
s (C
yprin
idae
):C
entra
l sto
nero
ller
Cam
post
oma
anom
alum
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Ros
ysid
e da
ceC
linos
tom
us fu
ndul
oide
s0.
000.
004
6.15
67.2
53.
370.
00Sa
tinfin
shi
ner
Cyp
rinel
la a
nalo
stan
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00Sp
otfin
shi
ner
Cyp
rinel
la s
pilo
pter
us4
28.5
758
.25
2.38
0.00
1523
.08
64.7
32.
733
9.09
83.0
07.
66C
omm
on c
arp
Cyp
rinus
car
pio
Linn
aeus
0.00
0.00
0.00
26.
06C
utlip
s m
inno
wE
xogl
ossu
m m
axilli
ngua
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
503.
0020
14.5
0C
omm
on s
hine
rLu
xilu
s co
rnut
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00G
olde
n sh
iner
Not
emig
onus
cry
sole
ucas
0.00
12.
5612
6.00
18.0
01
1.54
112.
0016
.61
13.
0317
6.00
53.0
0Sp
otta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s hu
dson
ius
0.00
12.
5695
.00
6.39
1320
.00
88.1
57.
771
3.03
74.0
03.
91Sw
allo
wta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s pr
ocne
0.00
0.00
46.
1553
.50
1.58
0.00
Blun
tnos
e m
inno
wP
imep
hale
s no
tatu
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00D
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Bla
ckno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
atra
tulu
s3
21.4
360
.67
2.34
25.
1361
.00
2.15
11.
5455
.00
2.20
0.00
Long
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys c
atar
acta
e2
14.2
992
.00
9.15
12.
5689
.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
Cre
ek c
hub
Sem
otilu
s at
rom
acul
atus
0.00
25.
1398
.50
13.1
51
1.54
150.
0037
.74
26.
0683
.00
8.46
Fallf
ish
Sem
otilu
s co
rpor
alis
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cyp
rinid
0.00
0.00
812
.31
30.3
80.
240.
00
08/2
2/00
11/1
8/00
03/2
5/01
06/1
0/01
(C
ontin
ued
on n
ext p
age)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 127
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.35
Con
tinue
d G
RA
YBIL
L-co
ntin
ued
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
2 R
uns
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Bul
lhea
d ca
tfish
es (I
ctal
urid
ae):
Yello
w b
ullh
ead
Am
eiur
us n
atal
is2
14.2
964
.50
3.11
615
.38
188.
0012
9.80
0.00
0.00
Mar
gine
d m
adto
mN
otur
us in
sign
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Topm
inno
ws
& K
illifi
shes
(Fun
dulid
ae):
Band
ed k
illifis
hFu
ndul
us d
iaph
anus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perc
hes
& d
arte
rs (P
erci
dae)
:G
reen
side
dar
ter
Eth
eost
oma
blen
nioi
des
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tess
ella
ted
darte
rE
theo
stom
a ol
mst
edi
214
.29
59.0
02.
491
2.56
72.0
04.
001
1.54
57.0
02.
380.
00B
ande
d da
rter
Eth
eost
oma
zona
le0.
000.
000.
000.
00S
hiel
d da
rter
Per
cina
pel
tata
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Dar
ter
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):R
ainb
ow tr
out
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00Br
own
trout
Sal
mo
trutta
0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Fish
:U
nide
ntifi
ed0.
000.
000.
000.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
1439
6533
08/2
2/00
11/1
8/00
03/2
5/01
06/1
0/01
128 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.36
Cod
orus
Cre
ek: I
ndia
n R
ock
Bac
kpac
k Fi
sh D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Aug
ust 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
IND
IAN
RO
CK
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
1 R
un2
Run
s2
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Whi
te s
ucke
rC
atos
tom
us c
omm
erso
ni2
3.23
56.5
2.32
0.00
0.00
46.
6716
2.75
149.
13N
orth
ern
hogs
ucke
rH
ypen
teliu
m n
igric
ans
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sunf
ish
(Cen
trar
chid
ae):
Roc
k ba
ssA
mbl
oplit
es ru
pest
ris2
3.23
101.
5021
.34
0.00
0.00
58.
3316
6.20
116.
26Le
pom
isLe
pom
is0.
000.
000.
002
3.33
43.5
01.
51R
edbr
east
sun
fish
Lepo
mis
aur
itus
11.
6165
.00
4.61
758
.33
127.
2938
.14
33.
5772
.33
10.5
10.
00G
reen
sun
fish
Lepo
mis
cya
nellu
s3
4.84
105.
6724
.77
325
.00
108.
3320
.33
11.
1913
1.00
41.9
02
3.33
121.
0043
.00
Pum
pkin
seed
Lepo
mis
gib
bosu
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00Bl
uegi
llLe
pom
is m
acro
chiru
s1
1.61
31.0
00.
540.
000.
001
1.67
72.0
07.
89R
edea
r sun
fish
Lepo
mis
mic
rolo
phus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sm
allm
outh
bas
sM
icro
pter
us d
olom
ieui
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Larg
emou
th b
ass
Mic
ropt
erus
sal
moi
des
11.
6159
.00
2.78
0.00
0.00
0.00
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):Sl
imy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cogn
atus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Riff
le s
culp
inC
ottu
s gu
losu
s0.
000.
002
2.38
59.5
01.
440.
00
Car
ps &
min
now
s (C
yprin
idae
):C
entra
l sto
nero
ller
Cam
post
oma
anom
alum
34.
8472
.33
5.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
Ros
ysid
e da
ceC
linos
tom
us fu
ndul
oide
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00Sa
tinfin
shi
ner
Cyp
rinel
la a
nalo
stan
us0.
000.
001
1.19
61.0
01.
640.
00S
potfi
n sh
iner
Cyp
rinel
la s
pilo
pter
us3
4.84
70.6
73.
030.
0035
41.6
763
.69
2.14
11.
67-
4.73
Com
mon
car
pC
yprin
us c
arpi
o Li
nnae
us0.
000.
000.
001
1.67
541.
0024
12.0
0C
utlip
s m
inno
wEx
oglo
ssum
max
illing
ua0.
000.
000.
000.
00C
omm
on s
hine
rLu
xilu
s co
rnut
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00G
olde
n sh
iner
Not
emig
onus
cry
sole
ucas
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Spo
ttail
shin
erN
otro
pis
huds
oniu
s12
19.3
549
.58
1.05
0.00
2327
.38
56.0
91.
644
6.67
68.5
03.
32S
wal
low
tail
shin
erN
otro
pis
proc
ne9
14.5
250
.56
1.19
0.00
1315
.48
59.8
52.
090.
00B
lunt
nose
min
now
Pim
epha
les
nota
tus
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.
3377
.50
6.60
Dac
eR
hini
chth
ys1
1.61
45.0
00.
830.
000.
000.
00B
lack
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys a
tratu
lus
23.
2344
.50
0.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
Long
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys c
atar
acta
e6
9.68
63.1
73.
240.
000.
000.
00C
reek
chu
bS
emot
ilus
atro
mac
ulat
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00Fa
llfis
hS
emot
ilus
corp
oral
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00C
yprin
id5
8.06
--
0.00
0.00
13.0
21.6
749
.23
1.15
08/2
3/00
11/1
8/00
03/2
5/01
06/1
0/01
(C
ontin
ued
on n
ext p
age)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 129
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.36
Con
tinue
d IN
DIA
N R
OC
K-co
ntin
ued
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
1 R
un2
Run
s2
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Bul
lhea
d ca
tfish
es (I
ctal
urid
ae):
Yel
low
bul
lhea
dA
mei
urus
nat
alis
11.
6110
3.00
14.0
02
16.6
723
2.50
177.
500.
001.
01.
6720
3.00
120.
00M
argi
ned
mad
tom
Not
urus
insi
gnis
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Topm
inno
ws
& K
illifi
shes
(Fun
dulid
ae):
Ban
ded
killif
ish
Fund
ulus
dia
phan
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Perc
hes
& d
arte
rs (P
erci
dae)
:G
reen
side
dar
ter
Eth
eost
oma
blen
nioi
des
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tess
ella
ted
darte
rE
theo
stom
a ol
mst
edi
1016
.13
52.0
01.
540.
005
5.95
50.2
01.
5724
.040
.00
54.0
41.
69B
ande
d da
rter
Eth
eost
oma
zona
le0.
000.
000.
000.
00S
hiel
d da
rter
Per
cina
pel
tata
0.00
0.00
11.
1978
.00
5.04
0.00
Dar
ter
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):R
ainb
ow tr
out
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00B
row
n tro
utS
alm
o tru
tta
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Fish
:U
nide
ntifi
ed0.
000.
000.
000.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
6212
8460
08/2
3/00
11/1
8/00
03/2
5/01
06/1
0/01
130 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.37
Cod
orus
Cre
ek: A
rsen
al B
ackp
ack
Fish
Dat
a Su
mm
ary
for A
ugus
t 200
0 to
June
200
1 A
RSE
NA
LS
ampl
ing
Dat
e/#
of ru
ns =
3
Run
s1
Run
3 R
uns
3 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Whi
te s
ucke
rC
atos
tom
us c
omm
erso
ni1
1.30
754.
580.
004
5.00
58.5
02.
444
13.7
935
6.50
528.
75N
orth
ern
hogs
ucke
rH
ypen
teliu
m n
igric
ans
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sunf
ish
(Cen
trar
chid
ae):
Roc
k ba
ssA
mbl
oplit
es ru
pest
ris21
27.2
710
5.52
43.3
42
20.0
010
6.50
41.4
020
25.0
070
.85
19.1
27
24.1
414
5.33
54.9
2Le
pom
isLe
pom
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00R
edbr
east
sun
fish
Lepo
mis
aur
itus
1620
.78
123.
3150
.94
550
.00
117.
2033
.60
1215
.00
52.3
36.
746
20.6
912
1.50
46.0
0G
reen
sun
fish
Lepo
mis
cya
nellu
s3
3.90
59.0
08.
620.
001
1.25
110.
0023
.82
0.00
Pum
pkin
seed
Lepo
mis
gib
bosu
s1
1.30
73.0
07.
652
20.0
012
4.00
39.0
00.
001
3.45
130.
0051
.00
Blu
egill
Lepo
mis
mac
roch
irus
56.
4943
.20
2.09
0.00
0.00
413
.79
49.0
02.
16R
edea
r sun
fish
Lepo
mis
mic
rolo
phus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Smal
lmou
th b
ass
Mic
ropt
erus
dol
omie
ui1
1.30
60.0
03.
161
10.0
094
.00
9.00
0.00
13.
4520
9.00
100.
00La
rgem
outh
bas
sM
icro
pter
us s
alm
oide
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):Sl
imy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cogn
atus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Riff
le s
culp
inC
ottu
s gu
losu
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Car
ps &
min
now
s (C
yprin
idae
):C
entra
l sto
nero
ller
Cam
post
oma
anom
alum
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.
4555
.00
1.45
Ros
ysid
e da
ceC
linos
tom
us fu
ndul
oide
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00Sa
tinfin
shi
ner
Cyp
rinel
la a
nalo
stan
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00S
potfi
n sh
iner
Cyp
rinel
la s
pilo
pter
us0.
000.
000.
001
3.45
62.0
02.
12C
omm
on c
arp
Cyp
rinus
car
pio
Linn
aeus
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.
4568
0.00
-C
utlip
s m
inno
wEx
oglo
ssum
max
illing
ua0.
000.
000.
000.
00C
omm
on s
hine
rLu
xilu
s co
rnut
us0.
000.
000.
000.
00G
olde
n sh
iner
Not
emig
onus
cry
sole
ucas
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Spot
tail
shin
erN
otro
pis
huds
oniu
s0.
000.
005
6.25
49.0
01.
080.
00Sw
allo
wta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s pr
ocne
1620
.78
37.8
10.
490.
0019
23.7
543
.89
0.76
0.00
Blu
ntno
se m
inno
wP
imep
hale
s no
tatu
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00D
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Bla
ckno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
atra
tulu
s0.
000.
002
2.50
35.0
00.
360.
00Lo
ngno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
cat
arac
tae
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cre
ek c
hub
Sem
otilu
s at
rom
acul
atus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Fallf
ish
Sem
otilu
s co
rpor
alis
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cyp
rinid
22.
60-
-0.
0014
17.5
031
.21
0.24
2.0
6.90
--
08/2
3/00
11/1
8/00
03/2
5/01
06/1
0/01
(C
ontin
ued
on n
ext p
age)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 131
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.37
Con
tinue
d A
RSE
NA
L-co
ntin
ued
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
1 R
un3
Run
s3
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Bul
lhea
d ca
tfish
es (I
ctal
urid
ae):
Yello
w b
ullh
ead
Am
eiur
us n
atal
is1
1.30
265.
00-
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mar
gine
d m
adto
mN
otur
us in
sign
is0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Topm
inno
ws
& K
illifi
shes
(Fun
dulid
ae):
Band
ed k
illifis
hFu
ndul
us d
iaph
anus
0.00
0.00
22.
5053
.00
1.33
0.00
Perc
hes
& d
arte
rs (P
erci
dae)
:G
reen
side
dar
ter
Eth
eost
oma
blen
nioi
des
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tess
ella
ted
darte
rE
theo
stom
a ol
mst
edi
79.
0946
.43
1.07
0.00
11.
2552
.00
1.66
1.0
3.45
57.0
01.
72B
ande
d da
rter
Eth
eost
oma
zona
le3
3.90
39.0
00.
630.
000.
000.
00Sh
ield
dar
ter
Per
cina
pel
tata
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Dar
ter
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):R
ainb
ow tr
out
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s0.
000.
000.
000.
00Br
own
trout
Sal
mo
trutta
0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Fish
:U
nide
ntifi
ed0.
000.
000.
000.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
7710
8029
08/2
3/00
11/1
8/00
03/2
5/01
06/1
0/01
132 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.38
Cod
orus
Cre
ek: F
urna
ce B
ackp
ack
Fish
Dat
a Su
mm
ary
for A
ugus
t 200
0 to
June
200
1 FU
RN
AC
ES
ampl
ing
Dat
e/#
of ru
ns =
3
Run
s1
Run
3 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Whi
te s
ucke
rC
atos
tom
us c
omm
erso
ni0.
001
0.55
99.0
011
.08
0.00
Nor
ther
n ho
gsuc
ker
Hyp
ente
lium
nig
rican
s0.
000.
000.
00
Sunf
ish
(Cen
trar
chid
ae):
Roc
k ba
ssA
mbl
oplit
es ru
pest
ris0.
000.
002
2.70
121.
5044
.50
Lepo
mis
Lepo
mis
0.00
0.00
0.00
Red
brea
st s
unfis
hLe
pom
is a
uritu
s0.
001
0.55
114.
0027
.45
0.00
Gre
en s
unfis
hLe
pom
is c
yane
llus
2019
.05
86.5
013
.63
73.
8395
.14
18.4
711
14.8
610
8.36
30.9
8P
umpk
inse
edLe
pom
is g
ibbo
sus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Blu
egill
Lepo
mis
mac
roch
irus
0.00
0.00
34.
0567
.33
8.56
Red
ear s
unfis
hLe
pom
is m
icro
loph
us0.
004
2.19
52.2
51.
040.
00S
mal
lmou
th b
ass
Mic
ropt
erus
dol
omie
ui0.
000.
001
1.35
239.
0020
0.00
Larg
emou
th b
ass
Mic
ropt
erus
sal
moi
des
0.00
0.00
0.00
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):S
limy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cogn
atus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Riff
le s
culp
inC
ottu
s gu
losu
s1
0.95
61.0
01.
620.
000.
00
Car
ps &
min
now
s (C
yprin
idae
):C
entra
l sto
nero
ller
Cam
post
oma
anom
alum
21.
9090
.50
10.8
12
1.09
81.0
06.
380.
00R
osys
ide
dace
Clin
osto
mus
fund
uloi
des
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sat
infin
shi
ner
Cyp
rinel
la a
nalo
stan
us0.
001
0.55
71.0
02.
390.
00S
potfi
n sh
iner
Cyp
rinel
la s
pilo
pter
us0.
0014
7.65
61.7
12.
091
1.35
75.0
05.
06C
omm
on c
arp
Cyp
rinus
car
pio
Linn
aeus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cut
lips
min
now
Exo
glos
sum
max
illin
gua
0.00
0.00
0.00
Com
mon
shi
ner
Luxi
lus
corn
utus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Gol
den
shin
erN
otem
igon
us c
ryso
leuc
as0.
000.
000.
00S
potta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s hu
dson
ius
2422
.86
44.7
10.
8064
34.9
745
.66
0.73
0.00
Sw
allo
wta
il sh
iner
Not
ropi
s pr
ocne
0.00
8043
.72
47.5
40.
910.
00B
lunt
nose
min
now
Pim
epha
les
nota
tus
0.00
0.00
22.
7071
.50
3.96
Dac
eR
hini
chth
ys0.
000.
000.
00B
lack
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys a
tratu
lus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Long
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys c
atar
acta
e1
0.95
58.0
01.
980.
002
2.70
68.0
03.
62C
reek
chu
bS
emot
ilus
atro
mac
ulat
us0.
000.
000.
00Fa
llfis
hS
emot
ilus
corp
oral
is0.
000.
000.
00C
yprin
id0.
004
2.19
36.7
50.
3325
.033
.78
42.8
80.
89
08/2
3/00
03/2
5/01
06/1
0/01
(C
ontin
ued
on n
ext p
age)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 133
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.38
Con
tinue
d FU
RN
AC
E-c
ontin
ued
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
1 R
un3
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Bul
lhea
d ca
tfish
es (I
ctal
urid
ae):
Yello
w b
ullh
ead
Am
eiur
us n
atal
is0.
000.
000.
00M
argi
ned
mad
tom
Not
urus
insi
gnis
0.00
0.00
0.00
Topm
inno
ws
& K
illifi
shes
(Fun
dulid
ae):
Ban
ded
killi
fish
Fund
ulus
dia
phan
us0.
000.
000.
00
Perc
hes
& d
arte
rs (P
erci
dae)
:G
reen
side
dar
ter
Eth
eost
oma
blen
nioi
des
1110
.48
67.2
73.
971
0.55
62.0
02.
608.
010
.81
74.5
04.
81Te
ssel
late
d da
rter
Eth
eost
oma
olm
sted
i34
32.3
850
.38
1.46
42.
1954
.50
1.96
9.0
12.1
653
.89
1.57
Ban
ded
darte
rE
theo
stom
a zo
nale
1110
.48
51.0
01.
730.
009.
012
.16
58.5
63.
71S
hiel
d da
rter
Per
cina
pel
tata
10.
9574
.00
3.98
0.00
0.00
Dar
ter
0.00
0.00
1.0
1.35
49.0
00.
53
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):R
ainb
ow tr
out
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s0.
000.
000.
00B
row
n tro
utS
alm
o tru
tta
0.00
0.00
0.00
Fish
:U
nide
ntifi
ed0.
000.
000.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
105
183
74
08/2
3/00
03/2
5/01
06/1
0/01
134 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
East
Bra
nch
Fish
Sum
mar
y 8/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =
153
Mea
n N
o. o
f Spe
cies
= 1
4
0510152025
Bande
d dart
er
Blackn
ose d
ace Bluegil
l
Bluntno
se m
innow
Brown t
rout
Centra
l ston
eroller
Common s
hiner
Creek c
hub
Cutlips
minn
ow Cyprin
id Fallfis
h Fish
Green s
unfis
h
Long
nose
dace
Margine
d mad
tom
Northe
rn ho
gsuc
ker
Rainbo
w trout
Rosys
ide da
ce
Spotta
il shin
er
Swallow
tail shin
er
Tesse
llated
darter
White su
cker
Percent of Total
Aug
ust
2000
Mar
ch20
01Ju
ne20
01
Men
ges
Fish
Sum
mar
y 8/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =
39M
ean
No.
of S
peci
es =
4
0102030405060708090100
Bande
d dart
er
Blackn
ose d
ace Brow
n trout
Green su
nfish
Long
nose
dace
Redbreas
t sun
fish
Slimy s
culpi
n
Tesse
llated
darte
rWhite
suck
er
Percent of Total
Aug
ust
2000
Nove
mbe
r20
00M
arch
2001
June
200
1
USG
S Fi
sh S
umm
ary
8/00
to 6
/01
Mea
n N
o. o
f Ind
ividu
als
= 85
Mea
n N
o. o
f Spe
cies
= 9
01020304050607080
Bluntno
se m
innow
Centra
l ston
eroller
Common c
arpCree
k chu
b Cyprin
id
Green s
unfis
h
Large
mouth ba
ss
Long
nose
dace
Northe
rn ho
gsuc
ker
Pumpk
insee
d
Rosys
ide da
ce
Satinfi
n shin
er
Spotfin
shiner
Spotta
il shin
er
Swallow
tail shin
er
Tesse
llated
darter
White su
cker
Percent of Total
Aug
ust
2000
Mar
ch20
01
June
2001
Figu
re 3
.94
Per
cent
Fis
h D
istri
butio
n fo
r Ups
tream
Site
s (Ea
st B
ranc
h, M
enge
s and
USG
S) C
odor
us C
reek
, Aug
ust 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001,
Bac
kpac
k El
ectro
fishi
ng S
ampl
es
Technical Bulletin No. 868 135
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Mar
tin F
ish
Sum
mar
y 8/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =
46M
ean
No.
of S
peci
es =
9
05101520253035404550
Blackn
ose d
ace Bluegil
l
Brown t
rout
Central
stone
roller
Common carp
Creek c
hub
Cyprin
id
Green su
nfish
Large
mouth ba
ss
Long
nose
dace
Pumpk
inseed
Redbreas
t sun
fish
Satinfin
shine
r
Spotfin
shine
r
Spotta
il shin
er
Swallow
tail shine
r
White su
cker
Yellow
bullh
ead
Percent of Total
Aug
ust
2000
Nove
mbe
r20
00M
arch
2001
June
200
1
Gra
ybill
Fis
h Su
mm
ary
8/00
to 6
/01
Mea
n N
o. o
f Ind
ividu
als
= 38
Mea
n N
o. O
f Spe
cies
= 9
051015202530354045
Blackn
ose d
ace
Common c
arpCree
k chu
b Cyprin
id
Golden
shine
r
Green s
unfis
h
Large
mouth ba
ss
Long
nose
dace
Redbre
ast s
unfish
Rosys
ide da
ce
Spotfin
shiner
Spotta
il shin
er
Swallow
tail shin
er
Tesse
llated
darter
White su
cker
Yellow
bullhe
ad
Percent of Total
Aug
ust
2000
Nove
mbe
r20
00M
arch
2001
June
200
1
Indi
an R
ock
Fish
Sum
mar
y 8/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =
55M
ean
No.
of S
peci
es =
10
010203040506070
Blackn
ose d
ace Bluegil
l
Bluntno
se m
innow
Centra
l ston
eroller
Common c
arp Cyprin
id Dace
Green s
unfis
h
Large
mouth ba
ss Lepo
mis
Long
nose
dace
Redbre
ast s
unfish
Riffle s
culpi
nRoc
k bas
s
Satinfi
n shin
er
Shield da
rter
Spotfin
shiner
Spotta
il shin
er
Swallow
tail shin
er
Tesse
llated
darter
White su
cker
Yellow
bullhe
ad
Percent of Total
Aug
ust
2000
Nove
mbe
r20
00M
arch
2001
June
200
1
Figu
re 3
.95
Per
cent
Fis
h D
istri
butio
n fo
r Dow
nstre
am S
ites (
Mar
tin, G
rayb
ill, a
nd In
dian
Roc
k) C
odor
us C
reek
, Aug
ust 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001,
B
ackp
ack
Elec
trofis
hing
Sam
ples
136 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Arse
nal F
ish
Sum
mar
y 8/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =
49M
ean
No.
of S
peci
es =
9
0102030405060
Bande
d dart
er
Bande
d killif
ish
Blackn
ose d
ace Bluegil
l
Centra
l ston
erolle
r
Common
carp Cyp
rinid
Green s
unfis
h
Pumpk
insee
d
Redbre
ast s
unfis
hRoc
k bas
s
Smallmou
th ba
ss
Spotfin
shine
r
Spotta
il shin
er
Swallow
tail s
hiner
Tess
ellate
d dart
er
White s
ucke
r
Yellow
bullh
ead
Percent of Total
Aug
ust
2000
Nove
mbe
r20
00M
arch
2001
June
200
1
Furn
ace
Fish
Sum
mar
y 8/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =
121
Mea
n N
o. o
f Spe
cies
= 1
1
05101520253035404550
Bande
d dart
er Bluegil
l
Bluntno
se m
innow
Centra
l ston
eroller Cyprin
id Darter
Green s
unfis
h
Greens
ide da
rter
Long
nose
dace
Redbre
ast s
unfish
Redea
r sun
fish
Riffle s
culpi
nRoc
k bas
s
Satinfi
n shin
er
Shield da
rter
Smallmou
th ba
ss
Spotfin
shiner
Spotta
il shin
er
Swallow
tail shin
er
Tesse
llated
darter
White su
cker
Percent of Total
Aug
ust
2000
Mar
ch20
01Ju
ne20
01
Figu
re 3
.96
Per
cent
Fis
h D
istri
butio
n fo
r Dow
nstre
am S
ites (
Ars
enal
and
Fur
nace
) Cod
orus
Cre
ek, A
ugus
t 200
0 to
June
200
1, B
ackp
ack
Elec
trofis
hing
Sam
ples
Technical Bulletin No. 868 137
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 138
3.9.2 Leaf River Fish
Table 3.39 Leaf River Boat Electrofishing Data Summary for October 2000 LEAF RIVER
Sampling Date/# of runs = 1 Run 1 Run 1 Run
Cou
nt
% o
f Tot
al
Mea
n To
tal
Leng
th (m
m)
Mea
n W
eigh
t (g
)
Cou
nt
% o
f Tot
al
Mea
n To
tal
Leng
th (m
m)
Mea
n W
eigh
t (g
)
Cou
nt
% o
f Tot
al
Mea
n To
tal
Leng
th (m
m)
Mea
n W
eigh
t (g
)
Bowfin (Amiidae):Bowfin Amia calva 1 0.71 642.00 2676.00 0.00 0.00
Freshwater eel (Anguillidae):American eel Anguilla rostrata 0.00 1 0.56 590.00 230.00 0.00
Suckers (Catostomidae):Quillback carpsucker Carpiodes cyprinus 18 12.77 417.17 863.78 11 6.18 389.46 723.64 9 14.29 355.33 618.89Highfin carpsucker Carpiodes velifer 3 2.13 274.00 302.67 7 3.93 279.57 309.14 3 4.76 209.67 128.67Blue sucker Cycleptus elongatus 0.00 0.00 1 1.59 454.00 2678.00Northern hogsucker Hypentelium nigricans 1 0.71 323.00 350.00 0.00 0.00Smallmouth buffalo Ictiobus bubalus 0.00 0.00 1 1.59 622.00 4173.00Blacktail redhorse Moxostoma poecilurum 5 3.55 339.40 416.80 11 6.18 313.00 340.00 12 19.05 256.42 179.33
Sunfishes (Centrarchidae):Shadow bass Ambloplites ariommus 0.00 2 1.12 131.50 59.00 2 3.17 177..50 109.00Warmouth sunfish Lepomis gulosus 0.00 1 0.56 170.00 90.00 0.00Bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus 4 2.84 144.00 46.50 14 7.87 160.07 93.29 2 3.17 163.50 75.00Longear sunfish Lepomis megalotis 27 19.15 102.56 22.52 42 23.60 102.10 23.29 8 12.70 117.00 34.50Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus 2 1.42 197.00 128.00 6 3.37 214.50 211.33 0.00Spotted sunfish Lepomis puntatus 0.00 1 0.56 82.00 10.00 0.00Spotted bass Micropterus punctulatus 18 12.77 189.11 84.11 20 11.24 183.60 86.60 10 15.87 223.50 135.40Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides 0.00 0.00 0.00
Herrings (Clupeidae):Skipjack herring Alosa chrysochloris 6 4.26 143.83 22.00 5 2.81 140.40 23.20 0.00Gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum 0.00 0.00 0.00
Carps & minnows (Cyprinidae):Blacktail shiner Cyprinella venustus 3 2.13 59.33 1.33 12 6.74 68.42 - 3 4.76 57.00 -Emerald shiner Notropis atherinoides 1 0.71 84.00 2.00 1 0.56 82.00 2.00 0.00
Mooneyes (Hiodontidae):Mooneye Hiodon tergisus 0.00 1 0.56 230.00 104.00 0.00
Bullhead catfishes (Ictaluridae):Blue catfish Ictalarus furcatus 0.00 1 0.56 718.00 4173.00 0.00Channel catfish Ictalarus punctatus 6 4.26 348.00 331.33 10 5.62 345.90 311.80 4 6.35 329.75 376.50Flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris 0.00 0.00 4 6.35 379.50 615.50
Gars (Lepisosteidae):Spotted gar Lepisosteus oculatus 8 5.67 486.63 364.75 8 4.49 491.38 377.00 0.00Longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus 1 0.71 460.00 180.00 1 0.56 405.00 128.00 0.00
Mullets (Mugilidae): Striped mullet Mugil cephalus 36 25.53 400.56 851.94 19 10.67 407.21 838.16 3 4.76 365.33 558.67
Perches & darters (Percidae):Blackbanded darter Percina nigrofasciata 0.00 2 1.12 64.50 2.00 1 1.59 72.00 2.00
Drums (Sciaenidae):Freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens 1 0.71 545.00 2540.00 2 1.12 444.00 1249.00 0.00
n (Total Individuals) 141 178 63
NEW AUGUSTA (RM 1.7) BOGUE (RM 10.3)10/17/200010/16/2000
DOWNSTREAM (RM 2.0)10/16/2000
(Continued on next page)
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 139
Table 3.39 Continued LEAF RIVER
Sampling Date/# of runs = 1 Run 1 Run
Cou
nt
% o
f Tot
al
Mea
n To
tal
Leng
th (m
m)
Mea
n W
eigh
t (g
)
Cou
nt
% o
f Tot
al
Mea
n To
tal
Leng
th (m
m)
Mea
n W
eigh
t (g
)
Bowfin (Amiidae):Bowfin Amia calva 0.00 0.00
Freshwater eel (Anguillidae):American eel Anguilla rostrata 0.00 0.00
Suckers (Catostomidae):Quillback carpsucker Carpiodes cyprinus 17 16.50 382.47 742.47 34 23.29 315.24 383.65Highfin carpsucker Carpiodes velifer 2 1.94 275.50 306.00 14 9.59 220.86 147.86Blue sucker Cycleptus elongatus 0.00 0.00Northern hogsucker Hypentelium nigricans 2 1.94 240.50 149.00 0.00Smallmouth buffalo Ictiobus bubalus 0.00 0.00Blacktail redhorse Moxostoma poecilurum 20 19.42 256.57 287.60 5 3.42 284.20 259.20
Sunfishes (Centrarchidae):Shadow bass Ambloplites ariommus 1 0.97 96.00 14.00 2 1.37 120.50 34.00Warmouth sunfish Lepomis gulosus 0.00 0.00Bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus 1 0.97 182.00 120.00 2 1.37 91.00 14.00Longear sunfish Lepomis megalotis 11 10.68 98.09 18.73 18 12.33 100.89 22.28Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus 0.00 0.00Spotted sunfish Lepomis puntatus 0.00 0.00Spotted bass Micropterus punctulatus 6 5.83 214.83 136.33 5 3.42 184.80 84.40Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides 0.00 2 1.37 253.00 197.00
Herrings (Clupeidae):Skipjack herring Alosa chrysochloris 0.00 0.00Gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum 0.00 11 7.53 288.73 251.09
Carps & minnows (Cyprinidae):Blacktail shiner Cyprinella venustus 3 2.91 53.33 33 22.60 45.48 -Emerald shiner Notropis atherinoides 0.00 0.00
Mooneyes (Hiodontidae):Mooneye Hiodon tergisus 0.00 0.00
Bullhead catfishes (Ictaluridae):Blue catfish Ictalarus furcatus 0.00 0.00Channel catfish Ictalarus punctatus 24 23.30 323.33 310.33 8 5.48 300.50 178.25Flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris 0.00 0.00
Gars (Lepisosteidae):Spotted gar Lepisosteus oculatus 0.00 5 3.42 525.40 464.40Longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus 0.00 0.00
Mullets (Mugilidae): Striped mullet Mugil cephalus 16 15.53 350.69 636.50 7 4.79 346.00 520.43
Perches & darters (Percidae):Blackbanded darter Percina nigrofasciata 0.00 0.00
Drums (Sciaenidae):Freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens 0.00 0.00
n (Total Individuals) 103 146
THOMPSON (RM 13.0)10/17/2000
MCLAIN (RM 27.5)10/17/2000
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Leaf
Riv
er B
oat F
ish
Oct
ober
200
0
051015202530American eel
Blackbanded darterBlacktail redhorse
Blacktail shinerBlue catfishBlue sucker
Bluegill sunfishBowfin
Channel catfishEmerald shiner
Flathead catfishFreshwater drum
Gizzard shadHighfin carpsucker
Largemouth bassLongear sunfish
Longnose garMooneye
Northern hogsuckerQuillback carpsucker
Redear sunfishShadow bass
Skipjack herringSmallmouth buffalo
Spotted bassSpotted gar
Spotted sunfishStriped mullet
Warmouth sunfish
Percent of Total
New
Aug
usta
Dow
nstre
am
Bogu
e
Thom
pson
McL
ain
Figu
re 3
.97
Lea
f Riv
er B
oat F
ish
Dis
tribu
tion
for O
ctob
er 2
000
140 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.40
Lea
f Riv
er B
ackp
ack
Elec
trofis
hing
Dat
a Su
mm
ary
for O
ctob
er 2
000
LE
AF
RIV
ER
S
am
plin
g D
ate
/# o
f ru
ns
=
1 R
un
1 R
un
1 R
un
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Bo
wfi
n (
Am
iidae
):B
ow
finA
mia
ca
lva
0.0
00
.00
0.0
0
Su
cker
s (C
ato
sto
mid
ae):
Hig
hfin
car
psu
cker
Ca
rpio
de
s ve
life
r0
.00
0.0
05
3.1
64
9.8
01
.57
Su
nfi
shes
(C
entr
arch
idae
):L
on
gea
r su
nfis
hL
ep
om
is m
eg
alo
tis1
87
.83
57.8
23
.87
14
7.1
84
9.8
62.
70
42.
53
46
.50
3.3
9S
po
tted
ba
ssM
icro
pte
rus
pu
nct
ula
tus
1
0.4
31
12
.00
12
.35
10
.51
131
.00
18
.50
10.
63
148
.00
28.1
4
Car
ps
& m
inn
ow
s (C
ypri
nid
ae):
Bla
ckta
il sh
ine
rC
ypri
ne
lla v
en
ust
us
130
56.5
237
.11
0.5
21
01
51
.79
37
.24
0.5
781
51
.27
37
.21
0.5
0L
on
gno
se s
hin
er
No
tro
pis
lon
gir
ost
ris3
113
.48
37.9
30
.51
14
7.1
84
1.2
90.
63
261
6.4
64
0.2
30
.51
We
ed s
hin
er
No
tro
pis
te
xan
us
20
.87
59.5
01
.42
42
.05
66
.75
2.2
00.
00
Mim
ic s
hin
er
No
tro
pis
vo
luce
llus
22
9.5
741
.36
0.5
44
72
4.1
04
1.1
30.
52
85.
06
36
.88
0.3
7B
ullh
ea
d m
inn
owP
ima
ph
ale
s vi
gila
x2
310
.00
48.7
41
.03
0.0
033
20
.89
32
.03
0.3
1
To
pm
inn
ow
s &
Kill
ifis
hes
(F
un
du
lidae
):B
lack
spo
tte
d t
opm
inno
wF
un
du
lus
oliv
ace
us
0.0
04
2.0
54
2.7
50.
75
0.0
0
Bu
llhea
d c
atfi
shes
(Ic
talu
rid
ae):
Cha
nn
el c
atf
ish
Icta
laru
s p
un
cta
tus
20
.87
98.0
01
1.5
20
.00
0.0
0
Per
ches
& d
arte
rs (
Per
cid
ae):
Bla
ckb
and
ed
da
rte
rP
erc
ina
nig
rofa
scia
ta1
0.4
371
.00
2.2
30
.00
0.0
0
Liv
ebea
rers
(P
oec
iliid
ae):
Mo
squ
itofis
hG
am
bu
sia
aff
inis
0.0
09
4.6
22
5.7
80.
22
0.0
0
So
les
(So
leid
ae):
Hog
choc
ker
Tri
ne
cte
s m
acu
latu
s0
.00
10
.51
62
.00
4.1
50.
00
n (
Tot
al I
nd
ivid
uals
)23
01
95
15
8
NE
W A
UG
US
TA
(R
M 1
.7)
B
OG
UE
(R
M 1
0.3
)D
OW
NS
TR
EA
M (
RM
2.0
)1
0/1
6/2
00
01
0/1
6/2
00
01
0/1
7/2
00
0
(C
ontin
ued
on n
ext p
age)
Technical Bulletin No. 868 141
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.40
Con
tinue
d L
EA
F R
IVE
R
Sa
mp
ling
Da
te/#
of
run
s =
1
Ru
n1
Ru
n
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Bo
wfi
n (
Am
iid
ae)
:B
ow
finA
mia
ca
lva
0.0
00
.00
Su
cke
rs (
Ca
tos
tom
idae
):H
igh
fin c
arp
suck
er
Ca
rpio
de
s ve
life
r2
1.2
22
9.5
00
.34
0.0
0
Su
nfi
she
s (C
entr
arch
idae
):L
on
ge
ar
sun
fish
Le
po
mis
me
ga
lotis
53
.05
30
.20
0.4
31
0.6
26
0.0
02
.98
Sp
ott
ed
ba
ssM
icro
pte
rus
pu
nct
ula
tus
0
.00
0.0
0
Ca
rps
& m
inn
ow
s (
Cyp
rin
ida
e):
Bla
ckta
il sh
ine
rC
ypri
ne
lla v
en
ust
us
73
44
.51
31
.71
0.3
01
23
76
.40
35
.80
0.4
2L
on
gn
ose
sh
ine
rN
otr
op
is lo
ng
iro
stri
s5
53
3.5
44
5.1
00
.93
27
16
.77
34
.00
0.3
7W
ee
d s
hin
er
No
tro
pis
te
xan
us
10
.61
66
.00
2.0
50
.00
Mim
ic s
hin
er
No
tro
pis
vo
luce
llus
31
.83
45
.33
0.8
22
1.2
44
2.0
00
.60
Bu
llhe
ad
min
no
wP
ima
ph
ale
s vi
gila
x2
1.2
25
4.5
01
.48
0.0
0
To
pm
inn
ow
s &
Kil
lifis
hes
(F
un
du
lid
ae
):B
lack
spo
tte
d t
op
min
no
wF
un
du
lus
oliv
ace
us
0.0
00
.00
Bu
llh
ead
cat
fish
es
(Ic
talu
rid
ae)
:C
ha
nn
el c
atf
ish
Icta
laru
s p
un
cta
tus
10
.61
52
.00
1.1
00
.00
Pe
rch
es
& d
art
ers
(P
erc
idae
):B
lack
ba
nd
ed
da
rte
rP
erc
ina
nig
rofa
scia
ta0
.00
0.0
0
Liv
ebe
arer
s (
Po
eci
liid
ae):
Mo
squ
itofis
hG
am
bu
sia
aff
inis
22
13
.41
24
.50
0.1
76
3.7
33
0.0
00
.30
So
les
(S
ole
ida
e):
Ho
gch
ock
er
Tri
ne
cte
s m
acu
latu
s0
.00
21
.24
48
.50
2.0
5
n (
To
tal I
nd
ivid
ua
ls)
16
41
61
TH
OM
PS
ON
(R
M 1
3.0
)M
CL
AIN
(R
M 2
7.5
)1
0/1
7/2
00
01
0/1
7/2
00
0
142 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Leaf
Riv
er B
ackp
ack
Fish
Oct
ober
200
0
0102030405060708090
Blackb
ande
d dart
er
Blacks
potted
topm
innow
Blackta
il shin
er
Bullhe
ad m
innow
Channe
l catf
ish
Highfin ca
rpsuc
ker
Hogchoc
ker
Long
ear s
unfis
h
Long
nose
shine
r
Mimic
shine
r
Mosqu
itofis
h
Spotte
d bas
s
Weed sh
iner
Percent of TotalNe
w A
ugus
ta
Dow
nstre
am
Bogu
e
Thom
pson
McL
ain
Figu
re 3
.98
Lea
f Riv
er B
ackp
ack
Fish
Dis
tribu
tion
for O
ctob
er 2
000
Technical Bulletin No. 868 143
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
3.9.
3 M
cKen
zie
Riv
er F
ish
Tab
le 3
.41
McK
enzi
e R
iver
Boa
t Ele
ctro
fishi
ng D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Sep
tem
ber 2
000
MC
KEN
ZIE
RIV
ERSa
mpl
ing
Dat
e =
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Larg
esca
le s
ucke
rC
asto
mus
mac
roch
eilu
s2
4.17
296.
5065
0.45
48.
8944
4.25
1021
.48
1126
.19
498.
5513
69.7
58
20.0
049
0.75
1286
.68
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):To
rren
t scu
lpin
Cot
tus
rhot
heus
24.
1750
.75
16.7
50.
000.
000.
00
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rinid
ae):
Nor
ther
n pi
ke m
inno
wP
tych
oche
ilus
oreg
onen
sis
714
.58
195.
2323
4.64
12.
2237
5.00
420.
007
16.6
732
6.57
337.
863
7.50
303.
0024
0.67
Red
side
shi
ner
Ric
hard
soni
us b
alte
atus
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.
5080
.00
6.00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):C
utth
roat
trou
tO
ncor
hync
hus
clar
ki5
10.4
223
1.60
176.
5038
84.4
425
1.53
153.
2916
38.1
027
4.44
189.
5619
47.5
029
0.00
232.
63R
ainb
ow tr
out,
wild
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s8
16.6
734
.14
18.1
31
2.22
200.
0072
.00
37.
1433
3.67
350.
677
17.5
09.
228.
00C
hino
ok s
alm
onO
ncor
hync
hus
tsha
wyt
scha
2450
.00
123.
2917
.33
0.00
511
.90
138.
6026
.00
0.00
Mou
ntai
n w
hite
fish
Pro
sopi
um w
illiam
soni
0.00
12.
2225
8.00
152.
000.
002
5.00
266.
0018
7.50
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
4845
4240
ARM
ITAG
E (R
M 6
)09
/20/
00H
END
RIC
KS (R
M 2
6.5)
MO
HAW
K (R
M 1
3.7)
HAR
VEST
(RM
10)
09/2
0/00
09/1
9/00
09/2
0/00
144 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
McK
enzi
e Ri
ver
Boat
Fis
h Se
ptem
ber
2000
0102030405060708090
Chinoo
k salm
onCutt
hroat
trout
Large
scale
suck
er
Mounta
in whit
efish
Northern
pike m
innow
Rainbo
w trout,
wild
Redsid
e shin
er
Torrent
sculp
in
Percent of TotalHe
ndric
ks
Moh
awk
Harv
est
Arm
itage
Figu
re 3
.99
McK
enzi
e R
iver
Boa
t Fis
h D
istri
butio
n fo
r Sep
tem
ber 2
000
Technical Bulletin No. 868 145
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.42
McK
enzi
e R
iver
: Hen
dric
ks R
M 2
6.5
Bac
kpac
k El
ectro
fishi
ng D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Sep
tem
ber 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
HE
ND
RIC
KS
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
2 R
uns
3 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):P
rickl
y sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s as
per
0.00
0.00
12.
4414
7.00
47.5
4M
ottle
d sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s ba
irdi
22.
7041
.50
1.28
14.
3556
.00
2.47
0.00
Pai
ute
scul
pin
Cot
tus
beld
ingi
0.00
0.00
24.
8867
.50
3.94
Sho
rthea
d sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s co
nfus
us3
4.05
70.0
04.
610.
000.
00R
iffle
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
gulo
sus
1317
.57
60.1
53.
240.
000.
00R
etic
ulat
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s pe
rple
xus
1418
.92
55.2
92.
325
21.7
453
.00
1.82
1946
.34
56.0
52.
57To
rrent
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
rhot
heus
2635
.14
52.8
13.
4215
65.2
254
.57
3.04
1536
.59
73.8
06.
56S
culp
in
34.
0529
.67
0.25
0.00
24.
8852
.00
2.05
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rinid
ae):
Long
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys c
atar
acta
e0.
000.
000.
00S
peck
led
dace
Rhi
nich
thys
osc
ulus
912
.16
63.1
13.
300.
000.
00R
edsi
de s
hine
rR
icha
rdso
nius
bal
teat
us0.
001
4.35
77.0
04.
080.
00
Lam
prey
(Pet
rom
yzon
tidae
):W
este
rn b
rook
lam
prey
Lam
petra
rich
ards
oni
45.
4168
.25
0.91
14.
3511
2.00
2.45
24.
8810
8.00
2.39
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):C
utth
roat
trou
tO
ncor
hync
hus
clar
ki0.
000.
000.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
7423
41
09/2
3/00
12/1
0/00
06/2
2/01
146 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.43
McK
enzi
e R
iver
: Bel
linge
rs R
M 1
8.5
Bac
kpac
k El
ectro
fishi
ng D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Sep
tem
ber 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
BE
LLIN
GE
RS
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
3 R
uns
2 R
uns
2 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Scu
lpin
s (C
ottid
ae):
Pric
kly
scul
pin
Cot
tus
aspe
r0.
000.
000.
00M
ottle
d sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s ba
irdi
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pai
ute
scul
pin
Cot
tus
beld
ingi
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sho
rthea
d sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s co
nfus
us0.
000.
000.
00R
iffle
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
gulo
sus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Ret
icul
ate
scul
pin
Cot
tus
perp
lexu
s59
76.6
255
.41
2.60
2354
.76
58.0
92.
9029
85.2
955
.93
2.94
Tor
rent
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
rhot
heus
1114
.29
45.0
91.
5412
28.5
745
.67
2.37
38.
8274
.00
6.42
Scu
lpin
0.
007
16.6
735
.00
0.34
12.
9459
.00
2.84
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rini
dae)
:Lo
ngno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
cat
arac
tae
0.00
0.00
0.00
Spe
ckle
d da
ceR
hini
chth
ys o
scul
us1
1.30
40.0
00.
630.
001
2.94
58.0
02.
14R
edsi
de s
hine
rR
icha
rdso
nius
bal
teat
us3
3.90
94.3
38.
990.
000.
00
Lam
prey
(Pet
rom
yzon
tidae
):W
este
rn b
rook
lam
prey
Lam
petra
rich
ards
oni
33.
9081
.00
1.06
0.00
0.00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):C
utth
roat
trou
tO
ncor
hync
hus
clar
ki0.
000.
000.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
7742
34
09/2
3/00
12/1
0/00
06/2
2/01
Technical Bulletin No. 868 147
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.44
McK
enzi
e R
iver
: Har
vest
RM
10
Bac
kpac
k El
ectro
fishi
ng D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Sep
tem
ber 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
HA
RV
ES
TS
ampl
ing
Dat
e/#
of ru
ns =
09
/23/
003
Run
s06
/22/
013
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Scu
lpin
s (C
ottid
ae):
Pric
kly
scul
pin
Cot
tus
aspe
r0.
000.
00M
ottle
d sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s ba
irdi
0.00
0.00
Pai
ute
scul
pin
Cot
tus
beld
ingi
6119
.55
49.3
91.
7321
26.2
561
.29
3.50
Sho
rthea
d sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s co
nfus
us1
0.32
55.0
01.
790.
00R
iffle
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
gulo
sus
134.
1770
.77
4.69
0.00
Ret
icul
ate
scul
pin
Cot
tus
perp
lexu
s19
6.09
58.5
33.
1530
37.5
057
.67
3.24
Tor
rent
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
rhot
heus
3511
.22
46.5
62.
2516
20.0
071
.75
7.16
Scu
lpin
88
28.2
130
.50
0.34
810
.00
48.3
81.
93
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rini
dae)
:Lo
ngno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
cat
arac
tae
10.
3263
.00
2.85
0.00
Spe
ckle
d da
ceR
hini
chth
ys o
scul
us92
29.4
958
.55
2.57
56.
2560
.00
2.73
Red
side
shi
ner
Ric
hard
soni
us b
alte
atus
10.
3284
.00
5.51
0.00
Lam
prey
(Pet
rom
yzon
tidae
):W
este
rn b
rook
lam
prey
Lam
petra
rich
ards
oni
0.00
0.00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):C
utth
roat
trou
tO
ncor
hync
hus
clar
ki1
0.32
72.0
03.
730.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
312
80
148 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.45
McK
enzi
e R
iver
: Arm
itage
, RM
6.0
Bac
kpac
k El
ectro
fishi
ng D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Sep
tem
ber 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
AR
MIT
AG
ES
ampl
ing
Dat
e/#
of ru
ns =
09
/22/
003
Run
s06
/23/
012
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):P
rickl
y sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s as
per
0.00
0.00
Mot
tled
scul
pin
Cot
tus
baird
i0.
000.
00P
aiut
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s be
ldin
gi14
13.8
646
.71
1.76
4751
.09
50.0
22.
80S
horth
ead
scul
pin
Cot
tus
conf
usus
87.
9254
.50
2.17
11.
0947
.00
1.42
Riff
le s
culp
inC
ottu
s gu
losu
s0.
000.
00R
etic
ulat
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s pe
rple
xus
87.
9259
.25
3.38
0.00
Torre
nt s
culp
inC
ottu
s rh
othe
us39
38.6
152
.95
2.73
2122
.83
70.9
56.
04S
culp
in
0.00
1314
.13
45.8
51.
36
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rinid
ae):
Long
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys c
atar
acta
e22
21.7
847
.95
1.40
55.
4368
.20
3.94
Spe
ckle
d da
ceR
hini
chth
ys o
scul
us10
9.90
54.2
01.
965
5.43
63.4
03.
34R
edsi
de s
hine
rR
icha
rdso
nius
bal
teat
us0.
000.
00
Lam
prey
(Pet
rom
yzon
tidae
):W
este
rn b
rook
lam
prey
Lam
petra
rich
ards
oni
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):0.
000.
00C
utth
roat
trou
tO
ncor
hync
hus
clar
ki0.
000.
00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
101
92
Technical Bulletin No. 868 149
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Hen
dric
ks B
ackp
ack
Fish
Sum
mar
y 9/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =
46M
ean
No.
of S
peci
es =
6
010203040506070
Mottled
sculp
in
Paiute
sculp
in
Prickly
sculp
in
Redsid
e shin
er
Reticu
late s
culpi
n
Riffle s
culpi
n Sculpi
n
Shorth
ead s
culpi
n
Speck
led da
ce
Torre
nt sc
ulpin
Wes
tern b
rook
lampr
ey
Percent of Total
Sept
embe
r20
00De
cem
ber
2000
June
200
1
Bel
linge
rs B
ackp
ack
Fish
Sum
mar
y 9/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =
51M
ean
No.
of S
peci
es =
4
020406080100
Redsid
e shine
rReti
culat
e scu
lpin
Sculpin Spe
ckled d
ace To
rrent
sculp
in
Western br
ook l
ampre
y
Percent of Total
Seot
embe
r20
00De
cem
ber
2000
June
200
1
Figu
re 3
.100
Per
cent
Fis
h D
istri
butio
n fo
r Ups
tream
Site
s (H
endr
icks
and
Bel
linge
rs) M
cKen
zie
Riv
er, S
epte
mbe
r 200
0 to
June
200
1, B
ackp
ack
Elec
trofis
hing
Sam
ples
150 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Har
vest
Bac
kpac
k Fi
sh S
umm
ary
9/00
to 6
/01
Mea
n N
o. o
f Ind
ividu
als
= 19
6M
ean
No.
of S
peci
es =
8
0510152025303540
Cutthroat
trout
Long
nose
dace
Paiute
sculp
in
Redside s
hiner
Reticula
te sc
ulpin
Riffle sc
ulpin Sculpin
Shorth
ead sc
ulpin
Speck
led da
ce
Torren
t scu
lpin
Percent of Total
Sept
embe
r20
00
June
200
1
Arm
itage
Bac
kpac
k Fi
sh S
umm
ary
9/00
to 6
/01
Mea
n N
o. o
f Ind
ividu
als
= 97
Mea
n N
o. o
f Spe
cies
= 6
0102030405060
Long
nose
dace Paiu
te sc
ulpin
Reticula
te sc
ulpin
Sculpin
Shorth
ead sc
ulpin
Speck
led da
ce Torren
t scu
lpin
Percent of Total
Sept
embe
r20
00
June
200
1
Figu
re 3
.101
Per
cent
Fis
h D
istri
butio
n fo
r Dow
nstre
am S
ites (
Har
vest
and
Arm
itage
), M
cKen
zie
Riv
er, S
epte
mbe
r 200
0 to
June
200
1, B
ackp
ack
Elec
trofis
hing
Sam
ples
Technical Bulletin No. 868 151
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
3.9.
4 W
illam
ette
Riv
er F
ish
Tab
le 3
.46
Will
amet
te R
iver
Boa
t Ele
ctro
fishi
ng D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Ups
tream
Site
s (H
arris
burg
and
Car
tney
), Se
ptem
ber 2
000
WIL
LAM
ETT
E R
IVE
RS
ampl
ing
Dat
e =
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Larg
esca
le s
ucke
rC
asto
mus
mac
roch
eilu
s12
54.5
545
4.17
1004
.94
1436
.84
472.
6412
15.1
9M
ount
ain
suck
erC
asto
mus
pla
tyrh
ynch
us0.
001
2.63
300.
0023
4.00
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):P
rickl
y sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s as
per
0.00
0.00
Pai
ute
scul
pin
Cot
tus
beld
ingi
0.00
12.
6359
.00
1.83
Torr
ent s
culp
inC
ottu
s rh
othe
us0.
001
2.63
79.0
06.
00
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rinid
ae):
Chi
selm
outh
Acr
oche
ilus
alut
aceu
s0.
000.
00C
omm
on c
arp
Cyp
rinus
car
pio
0.00
0.00
Pea
mou
thM
yloc
heilu
s ca
urin
us0.
000.
00N
orth
ern
pike
min
now
Pty
choc
heilu
s or
egon
ensi
s4
18.1
827
4.25
201.
255
13.1
624
6.80
286.
80R
edsi
de s
hine
rR
icha
rdso
nius
bal
teat
us0.
003
7.89
109.
3311
.00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):C
utth
roat
trou
tO
ncor
hync
hus
clar
ki1
4.55
112.
0012
.00
37.
8927
8.67
219.
67R
ainb
ow tr
out,
wild
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s0.
000.
00C
hino
ok s
alm
onO
ncor
hync
hus
tsha
wyt
scha
29.
0914
1.00
31.0
02
5.26
178.
0052
.00
Mou
ntai
n w
hite
fish
Pro
sopi
um w
illia
mso
ni3
13.6
413
7.33
22.0
08
21.0
515
1.13
30.0
0
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
2238
HA
RR
ISB
UR
G (R
M 1
60)
CA
RTN
EY
(RM
156
)09
/21/
0009
/21/
00
152 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.47
Will
amet
te R
iver
Boa
t Ele
ctro
fishi
ng D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Dow
nstre
am S
ites (
Sam
Daw
s, Pe
oria
, and
Will
amet
te P
ark)
, Se
ptem
ber 2
000
WIL
LAM
ETT
E R
IVE
RS
ampl
ing
Dat
e =
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Larg
esca
le s
ucke
rC
asto
mus
mac
roch
eilu
s21
36.8
446
2.43
1117
.86
1010
.31
385.
9084
3.46
1866
.67
425.
0090
0.00
Mou
ntai
n su
cker
Cas
tom
us p
laty
rhyn
chus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):P
rickl
y sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s as
per
0.00
11.
0312
5.00
24.0
00.
00P
aiut
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s be
ldin
gi0.
000.
000.
00To
rren
t scu
lpin
Cot
tus
rhot
heus
11.
7510
2.00
16.0
00.
000.
00
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rinid
ae):
Chi
selm
outh
Acr
oche
ilus
alut
aceu
s0.
0014
14.4
314
2.71
28.7
60.
00C
omm
on c
arp
Cyp
rinus
car
pio
11.
7547
0.00
1418
.80
0.00
0.00
Pea
mou
thM
yloc
heilu
s ca
urin
us0.
001
1.03
127.
0019
.00
0.00
Nor
ther
n pi
ke m
inno
wP
tych
oche
ilus
oreg
onen
sis
11.
7522
3.00
96.0
06
6.19
137.
0024
.83
13.
7019
3.00
71.0
0R
edsi
de s
hine
rR
icha
rdso
nius
bal
teat
us13
22.8
110
6.54
11.3
857
58.7
610
0.14
8.78
0.00
Trou
t and
Sal
mon
(Sal
mon
idae
):C
utth
roat
trou
tO
ncor
hync
hus
clar
ki4
7.02
232.
5014
9.25
11.
0325
5.00
180.
000.
00R
ainb
ow tr
out,
wild
Onc
orhy
nchu
s m
ykis
s1
1.75
295.
0024
8.00
0.00
0.00
Chi
nook
sal
mon
Onc
orhy
nchu
s ts
haw
ytsc
ha4
7.02
138.
0025
.75
0.00
27.
4114
1.00
28.0
0M
ount
ain
whi
tefis
hP
roso
pium
will
iam
soni
1119
.30
148.
0930
.18
77.
2214
5.00
27.0
06
22.2
215
8.00
37.0
0
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
5797
27
SA
M D
AW
S (R
M 1
45)
PE
OR
IA (R
M 1
36)
WIL
LAM
ETT
E P
AR
K (R
M 1
34)
09/1
9/00
09/1
9/00
09/1
9/00
Technical Bulletin No. 868 153
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Will
amet
te R
iver
Boa
t Fis
h Se
ptem
ber
2000
010203040506070
Chinoo
k salm
on
Chiselm
outh
Common
carp
Cutthro
at tro
ut
Large
scale
suck
er
Mounta
in suck
er
Mounta
in whit
efish
Northern
pike m
innow
Paiute
sculp
inPea
mouth
Prickly
sculpi
n
Rainbo
w trout,
wild
Redsid
e shin
er
Torrent
sculp
in
Percent of TotalHa
rris
burg
Cartn
ey
Sam
Daw
s
Peor
ia
Willa
met
te P
ark
Figu
re 3
.102
Will
amet
te R
iver
Boa
t Fis
h D
istri
butio
n fo
r Sep
tem
ber 2
000
154 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.48
Will
amet
te R
iver
: Whi
tely
RM
177
Bac
kpac
k El
ectro
fishi
ng D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Sep
tem
ber 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
WH
ITE
LYS
ampl
ing
Dat
e/#
of ru
ns =
09
/22/
003
Run
s06
/23/
013
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Larg
esca
le s
ucke
rC
asto
mus
mac
roch
eilu
s9
4.05
70.6
73.
550.
00
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):P
rickl
y sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s as
per
0.00
0.00
Mot
tled
scul
pin
Cot
tus
baird
i0.
000.
00P
aiut
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s be
ldin
gi0.
002
1.09
68.5
05.
25S
limy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cong
natu
s0.
000.
00R
iffle
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
gulo
sus
4018
.02
54.0
82.
360.
00R
etic
ulat
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s pe
rple
xus
83.
6043
.38
1.11
158
85.8
762
.94
3.52
Torre
nt s
culp
inC
ottu
s rh
othe
us8
3.60
81.1
37.
2423
12.5
086
.78
9.73
Scu
lpin
0.
000.
00
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rinid
ae):
Chi
selm
outh
Acr
oche
ilus
alut
aceu
s0.
000.
00P
eam
outh
Myl
oche
ilus
caur
inus
0.00
0.00
Nor
ther
n pi
ke m
inno
wP
tych
oche
ilus
oreg
onen
sis
0.00
0.00
Bla
ckno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
atra
tulu
s0.
000.
00Lo
ngno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
cat
arac
tae
0.00
0.00
Leop
ard
dace
Rhi
nich
thys
falc
atus
0.00
0.00
Spe
ckle
d da
ceR
hini
chth
ys o
scul
us15
569
.82
39.0
30.
751
0.54
43.0
00.
88D
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
0.00
0.00
Red
side
shi
ner
Ric
hard
soni
us b
alte
atus
20.
9040
.00
0.52
0.00
Cyp
rinid
0.00
0.00
Lam
prey
(Pet
rom
yzon
tidae
):W
este
rn b
rook
lam
prey
Lam
petra
rich
ards
oni
0.00
0.00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
222
184
Technical Bulletin No. 868 155
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.49
Will
amet
te R
iver
: Har
risbu
rg R
M 1
60 B
ackp
ack
Elec
trofis
hing
Dat
a Su
mm
ary
for S
epte
mbe
r 200
0 to
June
200
1 H
AR
RIS
BU
RG
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
09/2
1/00
3 R
uns
12/0
9/00
2 R
uns
06/2
1/01
2 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Larg
esca
le s
ucke
rC
asto
mus
mac
roch
eilu
s1
0.81
75.0
03.
146
6.00
66.8
02.
560.
00
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):Pr
ickl
y sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s as
per
0.00
22.
0096
.00
11.2
52
2.22
120.
5010
3.00
Mot
tled
scul
pin
Cot
tus
baird
i15
12.2
054
.73
2.15
0.00
0.00
Paiu
te s
culp
inC
ottu
s be
ldin
gi3
2.44
59.3
33.
330.
003
3.33
66.0
055
.33
Shor
thea
d sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s co
nfus
us0.
000.
000.
00R
iffle
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
gulo
sus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Ret
icul
ate
scul
pin
Cot
tus
perp
lexu
s19
15.4
558
.11
2.53
3232
.00
56.0
32.
4757
63.3
361
.14
50.5
6To
rrent
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
rhot
heus
97.
3258
.44
3.86
2222
.00
57.3
52.
5020
22.2
273
.05
60.0
5Sc
ulpi
n 0.
0027
27.0
065
.67
3.11
0.00
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rinid
ae):
Chi
selm
outh
Acr
oche
ilus
alut
aceu
s0.
002
2.00
42.5
01.
070.
00Pe
amou
thM
yloc
heilu
s ca
urin
us0.
000.
000.
00N
orth
ern
pike
min
now
Pty
choc
heilu
s or
egon
ensi
s0.
000.
001
1.11
99.0
084
.00
Blac
knos
e da
ceR
hini
chth
ys a
tratu
lus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Long
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys c
atar
acta
e23
18.7
051
.00
1.27
22.
0054
.50
1.69
33.
3348
.33
41.6
7Le
opar
d da
ceR
hini
chth
ys fa
lcat
us2
1.63
58.0
01.
600.
000.
00Sp
eckl
ed d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
osc
ulus
4032
.52
51.1
01.
602
2.00
48.5
01.
312
2.22
57.0
049
.00
Dac
eR
hini
chth
ys8
6.50
37.8
00.
405
5.00
55.0
02.
150.
00R
edsi
de s
hine
rR
icha
rdso
nius
bal
teat
us3
2.44
88.6
76.
520.
001
1.11
96.0
077
.00
Cyp
rinid
0.00
0.00
0.00
Lam
prey
(Pet
rom
yzon
tidae
):W
este
rn b
rook
lam
prey
Lam
petra
rich
ards
oni
0.00
0.00
11.
1112
7.00
-
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
123
100
90
156 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.50
Will
amet
te R
iver
: Car
tney
RM
156
Bac
kpac
k El
ectro
fishi
ng D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Sep
tem
ber 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
CA
RT
NE
YS
ampl
ing
Dat
e/#
of r
uns
=
09/2
1/0
03
Run
s12
/09/
002
Ru
ns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Su
cker
s (C
ato
sto
mid
ae):
Larg
esc
ale
suck
erC
asto
mus
mac
roch
eilu
s43
27.
3957
.53
1.29
66.
3868
.12
3.3
3
Scu
lpin
s (C
ott
idae
):P
rickl
y sc
ulp
inC
ottu
s as
per
0.0
00.
00M
ottle
d sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s ba
irdi
181
1.46
50.5
01.
690.
00P
aiut
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s be
ldin
gi0
.00
33.
1957
.67
2.7
3S
limy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cong
nat
us
0.0
00.
00R
iffle
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
gulo
sus
117
.01
49.5
51.
570.
00R
etic
ula
te s
culp
inC
ottu
s pe
rple
xus
0.0
08
8.51
58.6
32
.82
Tor
rent
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
rho
the
us21
13.
3847
.62
1.33
6771
.28
55.4
62
.46
Scu
lpin
0
.00
44.
2651
.75
1.6
1
Car
ps
and
Min
no
ws
(Cyp
rin
idae
):C
hise
lmou
thA
croc
heilu
s al
utac
eus
0.0
00.
00P
eam
outh
Myl
oche
ilus
caur
inu
s0
.00
0.00
Nor
ther
n pi
ke m
inn
owP
tych
oche
ilus
ore
gone
nsis
0.0
00.
00B
lack
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys a
trat
ulus
0.0
00.
00Lo
ngn
ose
dace
Rhi
nich
thys
ca
tara
ctae
0.0
00.
00Le
opa
rd d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
falc
atus
31
.91
33.6
70.
330.
00S
peck
led
dace
Rhi
nich
thys
osc
ulu
s60
38.
2238
.25
0.59
55.
3237
.80
0.5
2D
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
0.0
01
1.06
41.0
00
.59
Red
side
shi
ner
Ric
har
dso
niu
s ba
ltea
tus
0.0
00.
00C
yprin
id1
0.6
4-
0.45
0.00
Lam
pre
y (P
etro
myz
on
tid
ae):
Wes
tern
bro
ok la
mp
rey
Lam
petr
a ric
hard
son
i0
.00
0.00
n (T
ota
l Ind
ivid
ual
s)15
794
Technical Bulletin No. 868 157
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.51
Will
amet
te R
iver
: Int
ake
RM
148
.5 B
ackp
ack
Elec
trofis
hing
Dat
a Su
mm
ary
for S
epte
mbe
r 200
0 to
June
200
1 IN
TAK
ES
ampl
ing
Dat
e/#
of ru
ns =
09
/21/
003
Run
s12
/09/
002
Run
s06
/21/
013
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suc
kers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Larg
esca
le s
ucke
rC
asto
mus
mac
roch
eilu
s10
7.09
54.5
01.
587
10.0
066
.67
3.05
22.
2569
.50
-
Scu
lpin
s (C
ottid
ae):
Pric
kly
scul
pin
Cot
tus
aspe
r0.
007
10.0
056
.86
2.00
88.
9980
.00
6.12
Mot
tled
scul
pin
Cot
tus
baird
i14
9.93
51.9
31.
510.
000.
00P
aiut
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s be
ldin
gi0.
001
1.43
75.0
06.
592
2.25
72.5
0-
Slim
y sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s co
ngna
tus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Riff
le s
culp
inC
ottu
s gu
losu
s0.
000.
000.
00R
etic
ulat
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s pe
rple
xus
0.00
34.
2949
.33
1.58
1011
.24
57.2
02.
89To
rren
t scu
lpin
Cot
tus
rhot
heus
64.
2651
.67
1.75
1622
.86
58.5
82.
3912
13.4
880
.82
9.75
Scu
lpin
0.
0012
17.1
451
.43
1.78
1921
.35
40.5
01.
25
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rini
dae)
:C
hise
lmou
thA
croc
heilu
s al
utac
eus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pea
mou
thM
yloc
heilu
s ca
urin
us0.
000.
000.
00N
orth
ern
pike
min
now
Pty
choc
heilu
s or
egon
ensi
s0.
001
1.43
48.0
00.
930.
00B
lack
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys a
tratu
lus
0.00
0.00
11.
1249
.00
1.10
Long
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys c
atar
acta
e0.
002
2.86
68.0
03.
0011
12.3
655
.18
1.60
Leop
ard
dace
Rhi
nich
thys
falc
atus
64.
2635
.50
0.41
0.00
1213
.48
52.9
2-
Spe
ckle
d da
ceR
hini
chth
ys o
scul
us74
52.4
841
.21
0.68
68.
5742
.33
0.86
1112
.36
54.1
82.
29D
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
0.00
1521
.43
50.5
00.
921
1.12
45.0
00.
97R
edsi
de s
hine
rR
icha
rdso
nius
bal
teat
us31
21.9
929
.25
-0.
000.
00C
yprin
id0.
000.
000.
00
Lam
prey
(Pet
rom
yzon
tidae
):W
este
rn b
rook
lam
prey
Lam
petra
rich
ards
oni
0.00
0.00
0.00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
141
7089
158 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.52
Will
amet
te R
iver
: Peo
ria R
M 1
36 B
ackp
ack
Elec
trofis
hing
Dat
a Su
mm
ary
for S
epte
mbe
r 200
0 to
June
200
1 P
EOR
IASa
mpl
ing
Dat
e/#
of ru
ns =
09
/21/
003
Run
s12
/11/
002
Run
s06
/21/
013
Run
s
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Larg
esca
le s
ucke
rC
asto
mus
mac
roch
eilu
s15
15.6
346
.36
0.86
2120
.00
48.4
31.
150.
00
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):P
rickl
y sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s as
per
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mot
tled
scul
pin
Cot
tus
baird
i7
7.29
48.7
11.
170.
001
9.09
64.0
03.
50P
aiut
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s be
ldin
gi0.
001
0.95
59.0
01.
990.
00S
limy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cong
natu
s0.
000.
000.
00R
iffle
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
gulo
sus
1313
.54
44.0
00.
950.
000.
00R
etic
ulat
e sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s pe
rple
xus
33.
1347
.67
1.38
2120
.00
46.0
41.
324
36.3
653
.50
2.06
Torr
ent s
culp
inC
ottu
s rh
othe
us16
16.6
753
.00
1.93
2120
.00
56.0
02.
316
54.5
573
.00
5.90
Scu
lpin
0.
004
3.81
47.0
01.
430.
00
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rinid
ae):
Chi
selm
outh
Acr
oche
ilus
alut
aceu
s0.
000.
000.
00P
eam
outh
Myl
oche
ilus
caur
inus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Nor
ther
n pi
ke m
inno
wP
tych
oche
ilus
oreg
onen
sis
0.00
0.00
0.00
Bla
ckno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
atra
tulu
s0.
000.
000.
00Lo
ngno
se d
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
cat
arac
tae
0.00
10.
9552
.00
1.32
0.00
Leop
ard
dace
Rhi
nich
thys
falc
atus
0.00
0.00
0.00
Spe
ckle
d da
ceR
hini
chth
ys o
scul
us34
35.4
234
.53
0.34
2120
.00
38.5
70.
730.
00D
ace
Rhi
nich
thys
0.00
1413
.33
33.9
30.
340.
00R
edsi
de s
hine
rR
icha
rdso
nius
bal
teat
us0.
000.
000.
00C
yprin
id8
8.33
32.5
00.
260.
000.
00
Lam
prey
(Pet
rom
yzon
tidae
):W
este
rn b
rook
lam
prey
Lam
petra
rich
ards
oni
0.00
10.
9513
3.00
4.56
0.00
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
9610
511
Technical Bulletin No. 868 159
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Tab
le 3
.53
Will
amet
te R
iver
: Fis
her L
ane
RM
132
Bac
kpac
k El
ectro
fishi
ng D
ata
Sum
mar
y fo
r Sep
tem
ber 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001
FISH
ER L
ANE
Sam
plin
g D
ate/
# of
runs
=
09/2
1/00
3 R
uns
06/2
1/01
3 R
uns
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Count
% of Total
Mean Total Length (mm)
Mean Weight (g)
Suck
ers
(Cat
osto
mid
ae):
Larg
esca
le s
ucke
rC
asto
mus
mac
roch
eilu
s13
10.9
251
.23
1.09
12.
9485
.00
-
Scul
pins
(Cot
tidae
):Pr
ickl
y sc
ulpi
nC
ottu
s as
per
0.00
0.00
Mot
tled
scul
pin
Cot
tus
baird
i28
23.5
343
.88
1.17
0.00
Paiu
te s
culp
inC
ottu
s be
ldin
gi0.
000.
00Sl
imy
scul
pin
Cot
tus
cong
natu
s0.
000.
00R
iffle
scu
lpin
Cot
tus
gulo
sus
0.00
0.00
Ret
icul
ate
scul
pin
Cot
tus
perp
lexu
s0.
0019
55.8
862
.05
-To
rren
t scu
lpin
Cot
tus
rhot
heus
119.
2450
.60
1.91
514
.71
79.2
0-
Scul
pin
0.00
12.
9425
.00
-
Car
ps a
nd M
inno
ws
(Cyp
rinid
ae):
Chi
selm
outh
Acro
chei
lus
alut
aceu
s0.
000.
00Pe
amou
thM
yloc
heilu
s ca
urin
us0.
002
5.88
89.5
0-
Nor
ther
n pi
ke m
inno
wPt
ycho
chei
lus
oreg
onen
sis
0.00
0.00
Blac
knos
e da
ceR
hini
chth
ys a
tratu
lus
0.00
0.00
Long
nose
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys c
atar
acta
e0.
000.
00Le
opar
d da
ceR
hini
chth
ys fa
lcat
us9
7.56
35.0
00.
351
2.94
54.0
0-
Spec
kled
dac
eR
hini
chth
ys o
scul
us29
24.3
737
.71
0.51
0.00
Dac
eR
hini
chth
ys0.
000.
00R
edsi
de s
hine
rR
icha
rdso
nius
bal
teat
us26
21.8
539
.50
0.63
38.
8290
.00
-C
yprin
id0.
000.
00
Lam
prey
(Pet
rom
yzon
tidae
):W
este
rn b
rook
lam
prey
Lam
petra
rich
ards
oni
32.
5211
1.00
2.27
25.
8810
5.00
-
n (T
otal
Indi
vidu
als)
119
34
160 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Whi
tely
Bac
kpac
k Fi
sh S
umm
ary
9/00
to 6
/01
Mea
n N
o. o
f Ind
ividu
als
= 20
3M
ean
No.
of S
peci
es =
5
0102030405060708090100
Larges
cale
suck
er Paiute
sculpi
nRed
side s
hiner
Reticu
late s
culpi
n Riffle s
culpin
Speck
led da
ceTo
rrent
sculpi
n
Percent of Total
Sept
embe
r20
00
June
200
1
Har
risbu
rg B
ackp
ack
Fish
Sum
mar
y 9/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =1
05M
ean
No.
of S
peci
es =
10
010203040506070
Chiselm
outh Dace
Large
scale
suck
er
Leop
ard da
ce
Long
nose
dace
Mottled
sculp
in
Northe
rn pik
e minn
ow
Paiute
sculp
in
Prickly
sculpi
n
Redsid
e shin
er
Reticu
late s
culpi
n Sculpin
Slimy s
culpi
n
Speck
led da
ce
Torren
t scu
lpin
Western
brook
lamprey
Pecent of Total
Sept
embe
r20
00
Dece
mbe
r20
00
June
200
1
Car
tney
Bac
kpac
k Fi
sh S
umm
ary
9/00
to 6
/01
Mea
n N
o. o
f Ind
ividu
als
= 12
6M
ean
No.
of S
peci
es =
7
01020304050607080
Dace
Large
scale
suck
er
Leop
ard da
ce
Mottled
sculp
in
Paiute
sculp
in
Reticu
late s
culpi
nRiffl
e scu
lpin Scu
lpin
Speck
led da
ce
Torren
t scu
lpin
Percent of Total
Sept
embe
r20
00
Dece
mbe
r20
00
Inta
ke B
ackp
ack
Fish
Sum
mar
y 9/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =
100
Mea
n N
o. o
f Spe
cies
= 9
0102030405060
Blackn
ose d
ace Dace
Large
scale su
cker
Leop
ard dac
e
Long
nose
dace
Mottled
sculpin
Northern
pike m
innow
Paiute
sculp
in
Prickly
sculp
in
Redside s
hiner
Reticula
te sc
ulpin Sculpin
Speck
led da
ce
Torren
t scu
lpin
Percent of Total
Sept
embe
r20
00De
cem
ber
2000
June
200
1
Figu
re 3
.103
Per
cent
Fis
h D
istri
butio
n fo
r Ups
tream
Site
s (W
hite
ly, H
arris
burg
, Car
tney
and
Inta
ke),
Will
amet
te R
iver
Se
ptem
ber 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001,
Bac
kpac
k El
ectro
fishi
ng
Technical Bulletin No. 868 161
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Peor
ia B
ackp
ack
Fish
Sum
mar
y 9/
00 to
6/0
1M
ean
No.
of I
ndivi
dual
s =
212
Mea
n N
o. o
f Spe
cies
= 6
0102030405060 Cyprin
idDace
Large
scale su
cker
Long
nose
dace
Mottled
sculpin
Paiute
sculp
in
Reticula
te sc
ulpin
Riffle sc
ulpin Sculpin
Speck
led da
ce
Torren
t scu
lpin
Western
brook
lampre
y
Percent of Total
Sept
embe
r20
00
Dece
mbe
r20
00
June
200
1
Fish
er L
ane
Bac
kpac
k Fi
sh S
umm
ary
9/00
to 6
/01
Mea
n N
o. o
f Ind
ividu
als
= 77
Mea
n N
o. o
f Spe
cies
= 8
0102030405060
Large
scale su
cker
Leop
ard dac
e
Mottled
sculpin Peamou
th
Redside s
hiner
Reticula
te sc
ulpin
Sculpin
Speck
led da
ce
Torren
t scu
lpin
Western
brook
lampre
y
Percent of Total
Sept
embe
r20
00
June
200
1
Fi
gure
3.1
04 P
erce
nt F
ish
Dis
tribu
tion
for D
owns
tream
Site
s (Pe
oria
and
Fis
her L
ane)
, Sep
tem
ber 2
000
to Ju
ne 2
001,
Bac
kpac
k El
ectro
fishi
ng
Sam
ples
162 Technical Bulletin No. 868
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 868 163
4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
This compendium characterizes the depth and extent of data collected in the LTRWS and provides a summary of monitoring parameters for the 2000 to 2001 study year. Additional reports will be issued for each study year over the course of the LTRWS. These data represent in part the information that will be utilized in addressing the overall study objective of fully assessing the potential for mill effluent effects on the aquatic community in effluent receiving waters.
REFERENCES
American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation (APHA). 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. Washington, DC.
Dudley, J.L., Arthurs, W., and Hall, T.J. 2001. A comparison of methods used to estimate river rock surface areas. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 16:2, 257-261.
Hall, T.J., Dudley, J.L., Fisher, R.P., and Borton, D.L. 1999. Integrated long-term receiving water studies: site selection and a description of the selected study sites. In Proceedings, TAPPI 1999 International Environmental Conference, Volume 1, pp 47-70.
Hall, T.J., and Miner, R.A. 1997. Integrated long-term receiving water study methodology development. Water Science and Technology 35:315-320.
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI). 2002a. Long-term receiving water study data compendium: August 1998 to September 1999. Technical Bulletin No. 843. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.
______. 2002b. Integrated long-term receiving water studies: site selection process and a description of the selected study sites. Technical Bulletin No. 842. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.
______. 2002c. A compendium of field methods used in NCASI long-term receiving water studies. Technical Bulletin No. 841. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.
______. 2003. Long-term receiving water study data compendium: September 1999 to August 2000. Technical Bulletin (856). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
top related