6.0 synthesis and options...6.1 facilities master plan college of engineering | uw-madison)odg...

Page6.1

Facilities Master PlanCollege of Engineering | UW-Madison

6.0

Synthesis and Options

6.1 Distillation of Analysis/Gap Analysis

•

•

•

Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.2

Figure 6A.

Page6.3

SHORT - TERM MID - TERM LONG - TERM

Re-assignment of space to address deficits / surpluses- Renovation

Additions to Existing Structures

- Additional Space

New Structures

- Location(s) - CoE- Replacement Cost

Long-Term Plan

- Vision/Strategic Plan AlignmentRenovation

- Densification

Highest & Best Use –Assess current use:A Continued Use &

Additional Space- Deficit “Impact”- Implications for Site Access

- Feasibility

Replacement Cost- Enabling Cost- Potential Space

Available- Deficit Solution(s)

Plan Alignment- Balanced Utilization- Quality of CoE

Campus- Improved CampusA. Continued Use &

InvestmentB. Alternative Use &

InvestmentC Duration of

y ( )

- AlternativeFacilities / Locations (offsite)

p pSystems

- UW Campus Master Plan Integration

C. Duration of Current Use

D. Duration of Alternative Use

Figure 6A: Multi-Step Approach to Address Gap Analysis

6.2 Planning Variables

1. The anticipated number of undergraduate students.

2. The preferred ratio of 20 undergraduates to each T/TT faculty.

3. The continued ability of existing space to meet functional requirements.

Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.4

6.1 Distillation of Analysis/Gap Analysis

Figure 6B

5,000 5,550 6,000

24:1 209 230 250

22:1 228 250 270

20:1 250 275 300

Number of Undergraduates

Ratio

Number of T/TT Faculty

Figure 6B: Undergraduate to T/TT Faculty Ratios

Figure 6C

Department

726,530825,988

897,451969,248

1,014,391

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

209 T/TT5,000 @ 24:1

230 T/TT5,000 @ 22:15,500 @ 24:1

250 T/TT5,000 @ 20:15,500 @ 22:16,000 @ 24:1

270 T/TT5,500 @ 20:16,000 @ 22:1

300 T/TT6,000 @ 20:1

TotalA

SFRe

quire

d

1 Existing ASF not including Water Science Building2 Current faculty number is 181

2

1

Figure 6C: Number of Faculty to ASF

Page6.5

Figure 6D

6.3.2 Mid to Long Term: New Construction Options

Undergrad / Ratio T/TT Faculty Projected ASF Projected GSF 1

5,000 @ 24:1 209 T/TT 752,439 1,254,065

5,000 @ 22:15,500 @ 24:1 230 T/TT 825,988 1,376,647

5,000 @ 20:15,500 @ 22:16,000 @ 24:1

250 T/TT897,451 1,495,752

5,500 @ 20:16,000 @ 22:1 270 T/TT 969,248 1,615,413

6,000 @ 20:1 300 T/TT 1,014,391 1,690,652

1Assumes 60% efficiency for grossing factor

Figure 6D: Projected GSF Relative to Undergrad/Faculty Ratios

6.3 Options

6.3.1 Short to Mid-term Strategies: Renovation Options

Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.6

6.3.1.1 1410 Engineering Drive

Building Condition/Usage Summary

Potential Short-Term Strategies

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Page6.7

2

3

4

5

Figure 6E: 1410 Engineering Drive - Key to Potential Strategies

Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.8

6.3.1.2 Engineering Research Building (ERB)

Building Condition/Usage Summary

Potential Short-Term Strategies

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Page6.9

6.3.1.3 Materials Science and Engineering Building

Building Condition/Usage Summary

Potential Short to Mid-Term Strategies1.

2.

3.

3 1

2

Figure 6F: Materials Science Building - Key to Potential Strategies

Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.10

6.3.1.4 Engineering Hall

Building Condition/Usage Summary

Potential Short to Mid-Term Strategies

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

Page6.11

2

7

8

4,6

3

Figure 6G: Engineering Hall - Key to Potential Strategies (First Floor)

1

4,67

Figure 6H: Engineering Hall - Key to Potential Strategies (Second Floor)

Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.12

6.3.1.5 Wendt Commons

Building Condition/Usage Summary

Potential Short to Mid-Term Strategies1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Figure 6I: Wendt Commons - Key to Potential Strategies

15

Page6.13

6.3.1.6 Water Science and Engineering Laboratory

Building Condition/Usage Summary

Short to Mid-Term Strategies

6.3.1.7 Mechanical Engineering Building (ME)

Building Condition/Usage Summary

Potential Short to Mid-Term Strategies1.

2.

3.

Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.14

6.3.1.8 Engineering Centers Building (ECB)

Building Condition/Usage Summary

Potential Short Term Strategies

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Page6.15

1

5

23

6

Figure 6J: Engineering Center Building - Key to Short-Term Strategies

Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.16

6.3.2 Mid to Long Term: New Construction Options

5

23

5Offsite

446

8

6

1

7

6

Figure 6K: Options Evaluated

1.

Page6.17

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.18

7.

8.