approx. 165 cycle 8 districts

Approx. 165

Cycle 8 Districts

Self Evaluation* (various levels based on data

evaluation)

Evaluation, Findings and CIP submitted to TEA

TEA Desk Review of Self-Evaluation Results, Data, and

Continuous Improvement Plan

Implement CIP Evidence of Change (timely review and

check points)

ONGOING

Approx.15 other

districts w/ risk per

DAS

Districts w/ substantial or imminent risk

Focused Self Evaluation

Resubmit plan (choose outside

support)

TEA On-Site Review or

Contracted On-Site Review and Resubmit Plan

Oversight, Sanctions, & Interventions

TEA | Office of Special EducationNovember 2003

Special Education Monitoring SystemTransition Plan | 2003-2004

* Required level of review varies depending upon initial data review. Community stakeholders must be part of self-evaluation team (both required and recommended team members TBD).

CIP = Continuous Improvement Plan

ReviewOK?

PlanOK?

YES YES

NO, 1st Time

PlanOK?

NO

NO

ONGOING

NO

YES

Oversight, Sanctions, & Interventions

NO, 2nd time

ONGOING

YES

ImplementationOK?

FutureOther Random

Data andSelf-Eval check

Special Program Compliance

Review

Information Collection and Review

(TEA data andLEA submission)

Targeted TEA On-Site Review and Submission

of CIP