calcified senile scleral plaques

Post on 31-Dec-2016

216 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

119

Figure 1 CT appearances of calcified senile scleral plaques:bilateral occurrence in a typical location —– anterior to the inser-tion of the medial rectus muscle —– in a 72-year-old man. Theplaques appear as small ovoid calcifications on bone windowsettings (A) and are slightly more rounded in soft-tissue win-dows (B).Aspect TDM de plaques sclérales séniles calcifiées : localisa-tion bilatérale typique —– antérieure à l’insertion du muscledroit médial —– chez un homme âgé de 72 ans. Les plaquesaef

a[(iw[7toaponoh[wn

nsalhc

Correspondences

[5] Parmar H, Park P, Brahma B, Gandhi D. Imaging of idio-pathic spinal cord herniation. Radiographics 2008 Mar—Apr;28(2):511—8.

[6] Arts MP, Lycklama A, Nijeholt G, Wurzer JA. Surgical treatmentof idiopathic transdural spinal cord herniation: a new tech-nique to untether the spinal cord. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006Sep;148(9):1005—9.

M. Mejdoubi ∗

Department of Neuroradiology, Purpan Hospital,place du Docteur-Baylac,

31059 Toulouse, FranceE. Schmidt

Department of Neurosurgery, Purpan Hospital,Toulouse, France

∗ Corresponding author.E-mail address: toulousemm@yahoo.fr (M. Mejdoubi).

Available online 12 August 2008

doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2008.06.006

Calcified senile scleral plaques

Plaques sclérales séniles calcifiées

To investigate the prevalence of calcified senile scleralplaques (CSSP), all cranial CT scans acquired at Braunsch-weig Teaching Hospitals between 1st and 16th November2007 were retrospectively evaluated for the presence ofCSSP (N = 300 patients; mean age 61.7 years, range: 10—93;50.3% female; axial CT with 3 mm slices of the posteriorfossa, including the orbits, 6 mm supratentorially). Indica-tions included focal neurological deficit (33.3%), headache(13.3%), head injury (11.7%), reduced vigilance (10.3%), psy-chiatric states (10.3%), vertigo (9.3%) and staging (9.3%).

CSSP were identified in 18 patients (6%; mean age 80.6years, range 51—93; 83.3% female). Prevalence increasedfrom 2% in patients aged less than 70 years to 7.2% in thoseaged 70 to 79 years and to 22.6% in those aged more orequal to 80 years. The plaques most frequently involved theinsertions of the medial rectus muscles (77.7%) and weresymmetrical in 55.5%, appearing as ovoid hyperdensities(length 1—5 mm, width about 1 mm; bone window settings)(Fig. 1). The lateral recti were involved in 27.7% of cases(one patient had medial and lateral recti involvement) andno plaque was identified at the insertions of the superiorand inferior recti.

Scleral calcification has a differential diagnosis thatincludes major pathologies such as inflammation, lym-phoma and hypercalcemic states [1], but is not infrequentlyencountered in asymptomatic patients. In such cases, likedystrophic calcification elsewhere in the body, calciumsalts are deposited in plaque-like areas of hyaline dege-neration, usually anterior to the insertions of the rectusmuscles. While usually asymptomatic, plaque sequestrationand expulsion with ulceration may occur [2,3]. No associa-tion with systemic conditions has been observed [4] and

prevalence of between 3% and 6.2% has been recorded (ran-domly selected scans, ophthalmological indications [4—6]).CSSP were present in 6% of cases in our general patient popu-lation, which is similar to that in a previous report of anophthalmological population (6.2%, N = 145 [5]). In contrast,

R

[

pparaissent comme des calcifications ovoïdes de petite taillen fenêtres osseuses (A) et discrètement plus arrondies enenêtres molles (B).

lower prevalence of 3% was recorded in one study (N = 1006]), although that population was considerably youngermean age 35 years). We found that the prevalence of CSSPncreases considerably with age, which compares favorablyith previously published age distributions: Gordon et al.

5] reported a prevalence of 22.6% for patients more than0 years and Moseley [4] recorded a prevalence of 4% forhose aged 70 to 79 years old and 22% for patients morer equal to 80 years. As documented by Alorainy [7], welso found a higher prevalence in women, which may beartly explained by the higher mean age of the women inur cohort (65.8 years vs. 57.3 years for men). Due to scan-ing in a transverse plane in our study, an under-recognitionf plaque presence in the superior and inferior recti mayave occurred, although this is unlikely, given that Alorainy7] found that only one of 109 plaques (0.9%) in their seriesas located at the insertion of the superior rectus —– withone at the insertion of the inferior rectus.

In conclusion, around 6% of subjects undergoing cra-ial CT scanning for unrelated indications showed calcifiedenile scleral plaques, with a prevalence increasing withge. Radiologists should be aware of the appearance andocation of this ‘‘don’t-touch’’ lesion to distinguish it fromigh-density foreign bodies and clinically relevant scleralalcifications.

eferences

1] Shields J, Shieds C. CME Review: sclerochoroidal calcifications:the 2001 Harold Gifford lecture. Retina 2002;22:251—61.

1

[

[

[

[

[

[

20

2] Manschot WA. Senile scleral plaques and senile scleromalacia.Br J Ophthalmol 1972;62:376—80.

3] Hillenkamp J, Sundmacher R, Sellmer R, Witschel H. Seques-trating senile scleral plaque initially mistaken for necroti-zing scleritis. Surgical treatment. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd2000;216:177—80.

4] Moseley I. Spots before the eyes: a prevalence and clini-coradiological study of senile scleral plaques. Clin Radiol2000;55:198—206.

5] Gordon RN, Slamovits TL, Rosenbaum PS, Bello J. Calcified

scleral plaques imaged on orbital computed tomography. Am JOphthalmol 1999;127:461—3.

6] Murray JL, Hayman LA, Tang RA, Schiffmann JS. Inciden-tal asymptomatic orbital calcifications. J Neuroophthalmol1995;15:203—8. d

Correspondences

7] Alorainy I. Senile scleral plaques: CT. Neuroradiology 2000;42:145—8.

J. Gossner ∗

J. LarsenInstitute for Roentgendiagnostics and Nuclear Medicine,

Braunschweig Teaching Hospitals, Salzdahlumer Straße 90,38126 Braunschweig, Germany

∗ Corresponding author.E-mail address: johannesgossner@gmx.de (J. Gossner).

Available online 9 August 2008

oi:10.1016/j.neurad.2008.06.001

top related