cephir june 27, 2012 local strategies against inequalities in childhood health dr. onno de zwart,...

Post on 31-Mar-2015

220 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Cephir June 27, 2012

Local strategies against inequalities in childhood

health

Dr. Onno de Zwart, MPH

Rotterdam youth demography

• 23% of today’s Rotterdam population is 0-20 yrs old

• 175 different nationalities

• 12% of non-western origin (mainly Turkish, Moroccan, Surinam, Dutch Antills)

• 53% of non-western origin in the age group 0-20 years

Disadvantaged areas (children at risk) and (% non-western youth 0-20 years

36 23 28

26%

7%56

28%37%

10%

20%12%

4%

7

6%

36

5% 7566

11%16%12%

62

7763

52

12%

29%

Risk inventarisation Municipal Health Office Rotterdam

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%acute risk (acute safety risk in development child)

high risk (seriously threat in child development)

increased risk in child development

no risk

Families

• About one third lives in a single-parent family

• Families with children have a lower income than families without: 20% minimum, 14% structural minimal

• About 25% lives in a house that is too small

Youth in G4 and the Netherlands: Potential unfavorable family situations

Number %

Children in families living on well-fare 2009 2009

Rotterdam 20.450 17,5%

Amsterdam 20.320 14,6%

Den Haag 10.480 10,5%

Utrecht 4.290 7,5%

The Netherlands 183.500 5,2%

One-parent family with children (0-25 yr) 2010 2010

Rotterdam 42.842 23,8%

Amsterdam 53.020 24,2%

Den Haag 29.161 20,0%

Utrecht 10.928 10,6%

The Netherlands 135.951 14,0%

Teenage mothers 2011 2010

Rotterdam 319 −

Amsterdam 185 −

Den Haag 141 −

Preventive health care

Rotterdam 2000-2007*

Landelijk2000-2007

First visit to preventive health care after 14 weeks of pregnancy

36,1% 20,7%

Bron: Rapportage Perinatale gezondheid in Rotterdam, nulmeting periode 2000-2007*Begin 2013 gegevens beschikbaar over 2008-2011

Solutions

.Youth Policy (incl. regional en local program Every

Child Gains)

.Educational policy

.Healthy School

.Ready for a Child

Youth policy Rotterdam

.Youth policy including Youth Health Care (Youth and Family

Centres): responsibility of the city of Rotterdam

.Youth care and child protection: responsibility of the region of

Rotterdam

.2015: youth healthcare, care and child protection: decentralisation

to municipalities

9

Every child gains!

. Regional program (2007-2010)

. Regional and local program

(2011 -2014)

. Result:

. Youth and Family Centres: provides advice on raising children and, when

needed, guides parents and children into other areas of the youth care

system.

. More than 90% of children is seen

. More focus on children at risk

Every child gains and decentralisation youth care

Common goal

More children in Rotterdam will grow up in a safe home

with possibility to develop their talents.

Three objectives:

.Strengthen the basic services and the educational

environment

.Strengthen the professional workers

.Strengthen the strategy on care (improving steering

conditions)

Rotterdam: educational facts and figures

. 90.000 pupils in compulsory education: 174 nationalities

. 250 primary schools, 75 secondary schools, 2 schools for

upper secondary vocational training (50 locations), 4

schools for higher vocational education, 1 university

. Private school boards govern the schools

. Majority of parents is low educated

. Language at home is often not Dutch

The Rotterdam school population:Ethnicity in compulsory Education

5%4%

12%

38%3%

10%

2%

12%

14%

Netherlands Antilles

Cape-Verdian

Maroc

Dutch

North Mediterran

Other poor countries

Other rich contries

Surinam

Turkish

Educational Policy Rotterdam 2011-2014

Two action programmes:

. Beter Presteren: raising education results

. Aanval op Uitval: tackling Early (or Unqualified) School

Leaving

Educational Policy Rotterdam 2011-2014

raising education results

more time for learning

professional schools

parents involvement

2 school arrangements: ISO and Topclasses

Tackling Early school leaving

main factors, interventions

- growing focus on truancy; early and complete reporting by schools; more personnel to find and pick up truant youngsters

- growing awareness in vocational education that Gripping & Binding is important to keep pupils in school

- more diversity in vocational trajectories, more different ways of learning/training

- possibilities for streaming into school at several moments during the year, following the process of tracking and leading back

And a non-planned, positive development: bad perspectives on the

labourmarket keeps the youngsters longer in education/training

Tackling Early school leaving

monitoring ESL since the Lisbon Agreements:

Bruto VSV, netto VSV, Lissabonlijn - 1999-2008 (17 t/m 22 jarigen)

24,0%22,9%

20,7% 20,3% 21,0%20,1%

17,9%

15,3%

12,0%

28,3%27,3%

24,9% 24,4% 24,2%22,6%

21,3%

18,1%

15,2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

netto VSV

bruto VSV

Lissabonlijn

netto VSV 24,0% 22,9% 20,7% 20,3% 21,0% 20,1% 17,9% 15,3% 12,0%

bruto VSV 28,3% 27,3% 24,9% 24,4% 24,2% 22,6% 21,3% 18,1% 15,2%

Lissabonlijn 28,3% 26,9% 25,5% 24,1% 22,6% 21,2% 19,8% 18,4% 17,0%

1999/2000 2000/2001 2001/2002 2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008

GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond

Youth health care: Healthy City, Healthy Schools

. Gezonde School officially started in 2008

. In Rotterdam en region now more than

80 schools

Healthy Primary School

Primary School

secondary School

Healthy secondary school

Special education

Starting point

. ‘Maximize their potential’

. Using this message gets politicians at our side

. health, education and development are closely linked

Basic principles

Question/need of the school is central

No ad hoc activities, but a structural

approach

Integrated approach on four levels

Team with other partners: local &

regional organizations

Programma Klaar voor een KindErnie van der Weg

Program Ready for a Child

B

C

D

E

A

TOP 5 ongunstige wijken

A Waalhaven / rand Charlois 37

B Schieveen 34

C Pernis 24

D Delfshaven 23

E Nieuw Crooswijk 22

Gemiddelde Nederland: 10,3

A13A20 A16

A15

Babysterfte (foetale sterfte: vanaf 22 weken zwangerschapsduur + vroegneonatale sterfte: tot 7 dagen na de bevalling) in aantal per 1000 geboorten, naar wijk

Preconceptional care- Pregnancy Giving birth safely After birth care CJF (CJG)

Programstructure, education, information, research, monitoring & evaluation

Conclusions

.Rotterdam does have inequalities in youth health

. As in health among adults

.Health infrastructure is suited to all

. Youth health care more focus on groups at risk

. ‘Every child gains’ offers a chance for a new system

. Important to stimulate better educational results

.We need a more integrated postitively based youth

policy. With the restructuring of the city

organisation there’s a chance to reach that goal.

top related