developments in metrology

Post on 03-Jan-2016

28 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Developments in Metrology. Ed W.B. de Leer NMi Van Swinden Laboratorium The Netherlands. UNECE WP.6 Presentation 24 november 2004. Measurement Process. Measurand. Validation, Measurement Uncertainty. SI. Primary Procedure. Primary Standard. Secondary Standards. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

1

Developments in Metrology

Ed W.B. de LeerNMi Van Swinden Laboratorium

The Netherlands

UNECE WP.6 Presentation 24 november 2004

2

Secondary Standards

SI

Measurand

MeasurementResult

Measurement Process

PrimaryStandard

Calibrated Instrument

s

PrimaryProcedure

Validation,Measurement Uncertainty

Traceability

3

Traceability to the SI

Harmonizedlegal regulations

ValidatedMeasurement Methods

Competence of conformity assessment bodies

World Measurement System

NMI´sNMI´s

4

Metre Convention

5

6

BIPM

Scientific centre for metrology: custodian of the kilogram and the time

7

EUROMET

8

CIPM MRA

9

Mutual recognition

Mutual recognition of calibration certificates is based on

1. Results obtained in BIPM or regional key comparisons

2. Successful implementation of a quality system based on the principles of ISO/IEC 17025 and, where relevant, ISO Guide 34.The recognition of the QMS can be based on accreditation, peer evaluation or self declaration.In EUROMET, the quality system must be presented in a QS Forum.

Key Comparisons of National Standards

11

1 kg Key Comparison

12

KCDB

kcdb.bipm.fr

13

KCDB

14

KCDB

15

“High Accuracy” comparisons

All laboratories send a standard to the pilot laboratory

Preparation errors can now be Preparation errors can now be “randomised”“randomised”

16

GC-TCD results

GC-TCD Results for 50,000 umol/mol CO in nitrogen

0,93

0,94

0,95

0,96

0,97

0,98

0,99

1,00

1,01

1,02

1,03

47000 47500 48000 48500 49000 49500 50000 50500 51000 51500 52000 52500

Concentration (umol/mol)

Rat

io t

o C

on

tro

l

17

GLS for GC-TCD versus Gravimetry

• Conclusions for 50,000 mol/mol– Std dev of residuals is 1mol/mol (0.002% rel)-

after excluding two outliers– At 50,000 mol/mol, the gravimetric values are

very consistent within their stated uncertainties.

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

BAM CENAM CSIRO IPQ KRISS LNE NIST NMIJ NPL

Re

sd

iua

l De

via

tio

n (

um

ol/m

ol)

k=2k=2

18

Cu in soil and sediment

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Cu (mg/kg dw, certified value)

Cu

(m

g/k

g d

w,

measu

red

valu

e)

intercept: 0.55 ± 1.28 mg/ kg (k=2)slope: 0.969 ± 0.064 (k=2)

Validation of CRMs with IDMS

19

Publication of draft VIM revision

• International Vocabulary in MetrologyApril, 2004

• Revision is based on the Uncertainty Approach (UA) from the GUM. Old version is based on the error concept, which is called the Classical Approach (CA)Conflict with VIML?

• The comments from ISO are approximately 60 text pages

• Uno was not accepted as a new SI unit

20

Metrology in short

21

GUM revision ?

• No revision of the GUM will be published

• Measurement result = value + measurement uncertainty + unit

• 4 extensions to the GUM are in preparation

• First extension on Monte Carlo calculation of measurement uncertainty published as a draft version

22

Metrology and Standardization

• ISO– ISO 17000 (problem: definition of

conformity assessment activities)– ISO 17010 (problem: impartiality question)– MU concept is fully integrated in many new

standards

• CEN– MU concept is fully integrated in many new

standards

23

Metrology and Accreditation

• BIPM – ILAC• Certified reference materials are the link to

the SI for most chemical measurements• Accreditation of RM producers is now possible

against ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO Guide 34 in combination

• Special calibrations of NMIs (very low uncertainties)

• Harmonization BMC and CMC• Linking key comparisons to proficiency tests

24

From Cooperation to Coordination?

• European Research Area in Metrology (MERA)• Implementing the European Research Area in

Metrology (iMERA)• The metrology dilemma is budget driven:

– Do we serve the national needs in calibration?– Do we manage a profitable business?– Do we serve the future needs in metrology?

• The answer could be in coordination

25

Thank you

for your attention

top related