economics of patent litigation: itc vs. district courts of patent litigation: itc vs. district...
Post on 19-Apr-2018
228 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Economics of Patent Litigation: ITC vs. District Courts
Thomas L. Jarvis Winston & Strawn LLP
Washington, D.C. July 10, 2014
© tom.jarvis@winston.com
2 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
1. IP Value Realization a. Exclude competitors, maintain large profit margins b. License competitors, royalties from competitor’s profit margins
2. Informal Valuation Mechanisms a. Negotiation: inexpensive, but often slow b. Expert Opinions: inexpensive, knowledge of royalty rates,
but technology differences c. Arbitration/Mediation: wide range of expense, speed, satisfaction,
but depends on voluntary participation 3. Litigation
a. Expensive for small markets, inexpensive for large markets b. Force unwilling competitors to participate c. Most cases resolved w/o trial—97% of U.S. District Court, 60% ITC
Litigation: IP Valuation Mechanism
3 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
89 U.S. District Courts
U .S. District Courts with Most Patent Cases
District 2012 2013 Net Change
Eastern District of Texas 1,247 1,495 +248
District of Delaware 1,002 1,336 +334
Central District of California 499 399 -100
4 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
1. 6,000 patent complaints in 2013 2. 3% proceed to trial 3. Frequent flyers (Lex Machina)
a. Complainants—patent trolls (NPE/PAE)
b.Defendants—electronics/telecommunications companies
U.S. District Court Patent Actions
Defendant No. of Cases
Apple 59
Amazon 50
AT&T 45
Plaintiff No. of Cases
Melvino Technologies 137
ArrivalStar 137
Wyncomm 131
5 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
AIPLA: Cost of District Court Patent Litigation
+ Trial Appx. $6-7 Million
6 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
U.S. International Trade Commission 500 E Street, Washington D.C.
7 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
10 Year Statistics for IP Litigation at ITC
1. 90% of cases involve patent infringement
2. 70% of cases involve semiconductors or electronics
3. 40% of cases go to trial
4. 50% of cases won, at least in part, by complainants
5. 50% of cases are complete wins for respondents
8 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
ITC 337 Expedited Proceedings
9 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
ITC 337 Proceedings Instituted/Completed
10 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Larger Number of Complaints, Lower Win Rates
Michael G. McManus Duane Morris
11 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Federal Circuit Reversals: ITC vs. District Court
1. De novo appellate review of claim interpretation. − “from the beginning,” “afresh,” “anew,” “beginning again”
2. Claim interpretation reversed in 38% of appealed district court cases − Schwartz study 2008
3. Claim interpretation reversal rates are same for ITC and district court cases − Schwartz study 2009
4. ITC exclusion order effective during 18 month appeals, district court injunctions often stayed
12 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
AIPLA: Cost of ITC Patent Litigation
+ Trial Appx. $6-7 Million
14 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Differences in Patent Litigations at the ITC vs. U.S. District Courts
15 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
ITC Jurisdiction
1. ITC has jurisdiction over manufacturers and distributors of goods sold for importation into USA, importers, and those who sell after importation
2. Smart phone stream of commerce into USA: — Japanese LED component supplier — Taiwanese flat panel TV manufacturer — Mexican final assembly — USA retailer
3. All five business subject to jurisdiction of ITC
16 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
§ 337 Statutory Authority
The ITC Can Stop Importations into the U.S. of:
Section (A) − goods that are involved in unfair methods of competition that threaten to destroy or substantially injure a U.S. industry.
Section (B) − goods that infringe a U.S. patent or registered copyright that is also used by a domestic industry in the U.S. (over 90% of all cases).
Section (C) − goods that infringe a U.S. registered trademark.
Section (D) − semiconductors that infringe a registered mask work.
17 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Three Elements of § 337 Violations at ITC
§ 337 (B): Infringement of intellectual property rights
Products can be excluded from the U.S. if:
1. The products infringe a valid U.S. IP right, and
2. The products are imported, and
3. A U.S. domestic industry is using the IP rights
18 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
ITC Patent Infringement Law
1. Generally, same patent law as district courts
2. All patent cases from ITC & U.S. District Courts appealed to Federal Circuit
3. District Court §271(g) “Safe Harbor” against process patent infringement: (A) materially changed by subsequent process, or (B) infringing feature is a trivial and nonessential component of another product
3. Safe Harbors do not apply to ITC cases. Kinik Co. v. International Trade Commission
19 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Importation
1. Sale for importation into USA, importation, or sale after importation
2. Single unit of importation is sufficient
3. Trade show exhibitions often trigger complaints
4. Stopping importation will not stop ITC case
20 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Domestic Industry
§ 1337(a)(3) A domestic industry exists if, with respect to the articles protected by the IP right, there is:
(A) Significant investments in plant & equipment, or
(B) Significant employment of labor or capital, or
(C) Substantial investments in research, development, engineering or licensing associated with the IP
21 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Participants in 337 Cases
Administrative Law Judge
(ALJ)
ITC Commissioners
ITC General Counsel
Court of Appeals
Federal Circuit
U.S. Trade Representative(Trade Policy
Review Group)
U.S. President U.S. Supreme Court
Complainant(Patent Owner)
Respondent(Sale for
Importation)
Respondent(Importer)
Respondent(Sale After
Importation)
OUII Staff(Public Interest)
22 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Fast Proceedings: Typically 16 Months
Final Decision/Orders Commission Review
ALJ Deliberations Post-Trial
Trial Pre-Trial
Discovery Institution
Months
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
23 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Remedial Orders
1. Limited Exclusion Orders prohibit importation of infringing goods made by a respondent in the case
2. General Exclusion Orders prohibit importation of infringing goods made by anyone if the source of the goods is difficult to identify or if necessary for an effective remedy
3. Down-stream exclusion of finished products due to infringing components
4. “All Infringing Products” District Court injunctions limited to litigated products; ITC orders cover “all infringing products”
24 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
No Monetary Damages
1. No monetary damage awards, but frequent term of settlement agreements: — 97% of district court cases settled without trial or damage awards — 60% ITC cases settled, many with monetary payments
2. No obligation to license — compulsory licenses in EDTX
25 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Relationship of ITC and Federal Courts: Subject Matter Jurisdiction
U.S. Supreme Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
ITC District Court
Infringement U.S. IP Right + Imported Products + Domestic Industry
Infringement of U.S. IP Right
26 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Relationship of ITC and Federal Courts: Personal or In Rem Jurisdiction
U.S. Supreme Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
ITC District Court
Personal Jurisdiction or
In Rem Jurisdiction over Imported Products
Personal Jurisdiction
27 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Products & IP Rights Most Often at Issue in ITC Cases
28 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Technology at Issue in ITC Cases
29 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Fast Procedures Match Electronics Life Cycles
Electronics = 70% of all ITC cases
30 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
IP Rights & Protected Features
Food Chain IP Rights iPod
Marketing Copyrights Advertising
Branding Trademarks Apple TM
Appearance Design Patents Sleek Style
Manufacturing Process Patents Chip Fabrication
Product Design Utility Patents Circuit Diagrams
Consumer Research Trade Secrets Research TOP SECRET
31 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Which Court is Best for Specific IP Rights?
Food Chain IP Rights iPod
Marketing Copyrights Advertising
Branding Trademarks Apple TM
Appearance Design Patents Sleek Style
Manufacturing Process Patents Chip Fabrication
Product Design Utility Patents Circuit Diagrams
Consumer Research Trade Secrets Research TOP SECRET
Court
Customs
Customs
ITC
ITC
ITC
Fed/State Court
32 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Revenue Risk: ITC vs. District Court Patent Cases
33 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Life Cycle Cost & Revenue
25 25 25
24 24 24
23 23 23
22 22 22
21
20 20 20
19
18 18 18
17
16
15 15 15
14
13 13 13
12
11 11
10 10 `
9 9
8 8
7 7 7
6 6
5 5 5 5
4 4 4
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
0
-1 1 1 1
-2 2 2
-3 3 3
-4 4 4
-5 5 5 5 5 5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
Revenue ($ Millions USD)
Life Cycle in Months
Revenue$425 Million
R&D Cost$45 Million
34 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Revenue Risk of District Court: $30 Million
25 25 25
24 24 24
23 23 23
22 22 22
21
20 20 20
19
18 18 18
17
16
15 15 15
14
13 13 13
12
11 11
10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7 7
6 6
5 5 5 5
4 4 43 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
0
-1 1 1 1
-2 2 2
-3 3 3
-4 4 4
-5 5 5 5 5 5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
District Court Complaint Trial & Injunction Appeal
Revenue ($ Millions USD)
Life Cycle in Months
Revenue$395 Million
($425)
R&D Cost$45 Million
$30 MillionLost Revenue
35 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Revenue Risk of ITC Speed: $100 Million 25 25 25
24 24 24
23 23 23
22 22 22
21
20 20 20
19
18 18 18
17
16
15 15 15
14
13 13 13
12
11 11
10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7 7
6 6
5 5 5 5
4 4 43 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
0
-1 1 1 1
-2 2 2
-3 3 3
-4 4 4
-5 5 5 5 5 5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
District Court Complaint Trial & Injunction Appeal
ITC Complaint Exclusion Order Appeal
Revenue ($ Millions USD)
Life Cycle in Months
Revenue$325 Million
($425)
$30 MillionLost Revenue
$100 MillionLost Revenue
R&D Cost$45 Million
36 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Life Cycle Cost & Revenue: 2nd Gen Products
25 25 25
24 24 24
23 23 23
22 22 22
21
20 20 20
19
18 18 18
17
16
15 15 15
14
13 13 13 13
12
11 11
10 10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7 7 7
6 6
5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
0
-1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-2 2 2 2 2
-3 3 3 3 3
-4 4 4 4 4
-5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Revenue ($ Millions USD)
R&D Cost$45 Million
Revenue Gen 2$425 Million
R&D Cost$45 Million
Total Revenue Gen 1 + Gen 2$850 Million
Revenue Gen 1$425 Million
Life Cycle in Months
37 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Revenue Risk of District Court: $60 Million
25 25 25
24 24 24
23 23 23
22 22 22
21
20 20 20 `
19
18 18 18
17
16
15 15 15
14
13 13 13 13
12
11 11
10 10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7 7 7
6 6
5 5 5 5 5
4 4 43 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
0
-1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-2 2 2 2 2
-3 3 3 3 3
-4 4 4 4 4
-5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
District Court Complaint Complaint 2 Trial & Injunction Trial & Inj 2 Appeal
Revenue Gen 1$395 Million
Total Revenue Gen 1 + Gen 2$790 Million
($850 Million)
Revenue Gen 2$395 Million
$30 MillionLost Revenue
$30 MillionLost Revenue
R&D Cost$45 Million
R&D Cost$45 Million
Revenue ($ Millions USD)
Life Cycle in Months
38 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Revenue Risk of ITC Speed + 2nd Gen: $500 Million 25 25 25
24 24 24 `
23 23 23
22 22 22
21
20 20 20
19
18 18 18
17
16
15 15 15
14
13 13 13 13
12
11 11
10 10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7 7 7
6 6
5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
0
-1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-2 2 2 2 2
-3 3 3 3 3
-4 4 4 4 4
-5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
District Court Complaint Complaint 2 Trial & Injunction Trial & Inj 2 Appeal
ITC Complaint Exclusion Order Appeal
R&D Cost$45 Million
R&D Cost$45 Million
Revenue Gen 1$325 Million
Revenue Gen 2$20 Million
Total Revenue Gen 1 + Gen 2$345 Million
($850 Million)
$30 MillionLost Revenue
$30 MillionLost Revenue
Revenue ($ Millions USD)
Life Cycle in Months
39 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
1. Competitor v. Competitor Cases Dominate
2. Revenue Risk
3. Multi-Patent Cases
4. Complex Technology
5. International Discovery
6. Expedited Proceedings
7. 40% of Cases Proceed to Trial
8. Internal Appeals (Commission Review)
What Drives ITC Litigation Costs?
41 © tom.jarvis@winston.com
Questions / Answers
Thomas L. Jarvis, Partner Winston & Strawn LLP 1700 K Street, NW Washington, D.C. 2006 Direct Dial:+1.202.282.5324 Email: tjarvis@winston.com Licensed: New York
Washington, D.C. Taiwan U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
top related