essentials of neurosurgical anesthesia & critical care || post-operative pain management in...

Post on 19-Dec-2016

216 Views

Category:

Documents

4 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

697A.M. Brambrink and J.R. Kirsch (eds.), Essentials of Neurosurgical Anesthesia & Critical Care, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-09562-2_72, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Overview

The management of post-operative pain in neurosurgical patients can be challenging.

Many neurosurgical patients may be denied adequate analgesia because of the mistaken belief that opioids may mask neurological deterioration. Despite the diver-sity of neurosurgical procedures and the multiplicity of pain presentations in this population, effective and safe pain relief is possible for the vast majority of patients.

A sound knowledge of the pathophysiology underlying the neurosurgical condi-tion and an understanding of the complications associated with it are essential for optimizing safe post-operative analgesia. Many neurosurgical conditions are highly dynamic. A decrease in the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) must be carefully investi-gated as many neurosurgical complications may require urgent surgical and/or ther-apeutic intervention (Table 72.1 ). A deterioration in GCS must not be attributed solely to a relative opioid ‘overdose’ until other causes have been excluded.

Analgesia for major spinal surgery may be especially challenging. Many of these patients suffer from chronic pain and may present with a combination of nocicep-tive and neuropathic pain. A signifi cant number of these patients may be taking opioids pre-operatively. Acute on chronic pain is typically more diffi cult to manage than isolated acute pain.

M. Newton , MBBS, FRCA (*) The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery , London , UKe-mail: mary.newton@uclh.nhs.uk

T. Fernandez , MBBS, FCARCSI, FIPP, DPM Department of Anaesthetics and Pain Medicine , Imperial College Hospitals Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK

Chapter 72 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations

Mary Newton and Tacson Fernandez

698 M. Newton and T. Fernandez

Neuraxial opioids, alone or in combination with local anaesthetics, can be very effective following spinal surgery. However, the approach requires careful consider-ations; Neuroaxial local anaesthetic/opioids may be contraindicated if there is sig-nifi cant risk of an intraoperative dural tear which could result in unpredictable amounts of local anaesthetic/opioids reaching the cerebrospinal fl uid (CSF). In some centres, administration of opioids (particularly those that are long-acting and water soluble) into the CSF would commit the patient to care high dependency (HDU) care post-operatively. Additionally, local anaesthetic-induced motor block may mask neurological deterioration secondary to spinal cord compression by, for example, haematoma or tissue swelling. If this analgesic technique is used, it is imperative that the patient is monitored by nursing staff familiar with its use in this specialized population of patients. There must be a strict local protocol for the action to be taken in the event of onset of reduced limb power.

Increasing or uncontrolled pain post-operatively requires reassessment and con-sideration of alternative causes (Table 72.2 ), for example, a surgical complication or neuropathic pain.

Prevention

Pain is the fi fth vital sign and requires regular evaluation in combination with appro-priate intervention to maximize pain relief. Effective management of acute post-operative pain reduces the incidence of chronic pain; additionally, it aids early mobilization and may decrease factors associated with immobility (e.g. venous thrombosis and pulmonary atelectasis). Education of patients and clinical staff is vital to optimize acute post-operative pain management.

Table 72.1 Common causes of post-operative/post-procedure decrease in GCS

Common neurosurgical conditions Potential causes of decreasing Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

Sub-arachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) (post-clipping/post-coiling)

Re-bleed Acute hydrocephalus Cerebral vasospasm Seizure

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) Re-accumulation of haematoma Haemorrhage into contusion Oedema Seizure

Craniotomy Haematoma (sub-dural/intracerebral etc.) Oedema Seizure Air encephalocoele Infection – e.g. meningitis etc.

69972 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations

Pain Scores

Pain is a subjective experience and most measures of pain are based on self-report. Numerous pain scales exist. Descriptive scales, where pain is described as ‘none, mild, moderate or severe’ are easy to use. Numerical scores are less easy to use but are more accurate at assessing the response to an intervention. The most popular numerical scale is the visual analogue score (VAS); it consists of a 100 mm line where 0 mm correlates with no pain and 100 mm correlates with ‘worst pain pos-sible’. The patient is asked to mark the line to ‘score’ their pain. VAS ratings of > 70 mm are indicative of ‘severe pain’.

Education

Education of patients pre-operatively can help to reduce anxiety, post-operative pain, and other associated symptoms. Ideally, it should begin pre-operatively with information about the planned surgical procedure, expected pain relating to it, the hospital’s pain-scoring system (see below) and the importance of effective analge-sia to aid early mobilization to reduce the clinical risks associated with immobility. Patients should be aware of the analgesic modalities available to them; this informa-tion will need to be reinforced repeatedly in the early post-operative phase.

All clinicians involved in the post-operative care of neurosurgical patients need on-going education in acute pain management and the additional considerations for this specialist group of patients. Familiarity with the operative procedure and

Table 72.2 Post-operative complications which may increase pain Complication Cause of pain

Sub-arachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) (post-clipping/post-coiling)

Re-bleed Hydrocephalus Infection

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) Wound infection Re-accumulation of haematoma

Craniotomy Haematoma (e.g. sub-dural/intracerebral) Air encephalocoele Low ICP headache/CSF leak Infection – e.g. meningitis

Spinal decompression/fusion Nerve root compression by disc remnant/haematoma/oedema

Neuropraxia (C2 root especially common) Infection Malpositioned instrumentation Muscle spasm

Intradural/intramedullary spinal cord surgery

Wound infection Haematoma formation Meningitis Low ICP headache/CSF leak

700 M. Newton and T. Fernandez

associated complications are particularly important. Clinical staff must be familiar with the hospital’s pain-scoring system and the application of this to optimize anal-gesia. Standardized prescriptions for analgesia used in conjunction with frequent assessment of pain scores can improve post-operative pain management.

Recommended Analgesic Regimes

The World Health Organization (WHO) pain ladder (Fig. 72.1 ) describes a simplis-tic guide to the optimization of analgesia. Urgent action is required for patients in severe pain which frequently requires all three steps of the pain ladder to be initiated simultaneously, in combination with pharmacological adjuncts (Tables 72.4 and 72.5 ) and non-pharmacological adjuncts (e.g. reassurance, explanation of the cause of the pain and the intended management of it, careful positioning, cool/warm packs and eye shades). Prompt action in the provision of good pain relief reduces anxiety. Anxiety is known to exacerbate pain.

Table 72.3 is a guide to appropriate post-operative prescribing of multimodal analgesia in our unit where commonly performed neurosurgical procedures are categorized according to the predicted pain (VAS) in the post-operative period. Details of the timed introduction of multimodal analgesia for intra-cranial surgery are shown in Table 72.4 and for non-intracranial surgery in Table 72.5 .

Freedom fromcancer pain

Strong opiodwith or without

nonopiod, adjuvent

Weak opiodwith or without

nonopiod, adjuvent

Nonopiodwith or without

adjuvent

Pain persistingor increasing

Pain persistingor increasing

Pain

1

2

3

Pain medications: by the mouth by the clock by the ladder

Source: www.who.int/cancer/palliative/painladder/en

Fig. 72.1 WHO pain ladder

70172 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations

Tab

le 7

2.3

Som

e co

mm

on n

euro

surg

ical

pro

cedu

res

are

list

ed a

ccor

ding

to th

e pr

edic

ted

pain

(V

AS

) in

the

post

-ope

rativ

e pe

riod

to g

uide

app

ropr

iate

pos

t-op

erat

ive

pres

crib

ing

of m

ulti

mod

al a

nalg

esia

Pre

dict

ed p

ain

scor

es

with

out a

nalg

esia

E

xam

ples

of

surg

ical

pr

oced

ures

in th

is c

ateg

ory

Reg

ular

par

acet

amol

(a

ceto

met

ophe

n)

Reg

ular

N

SAID

a R

egul

ar o

ral

or P

CA

mor

phin

e ‘R

escu

e’ o

pioi

d if

req

uire

d

Con

side

r ph

arm

aceu

tical

ad

junc

t (T

able

72.

5 )

Min

or p

ain

(VA

S 1–

3)

Car

pal t

unne

l Y

es

Yes

N

o Y

es

No

Inte

rmed

iate

pai

n (V

AS

3–6)

C

rani

otom

y/L

umba

r m

icro

disc

ecto

my

Yes

(i.v

. fi r

st 2

4 h

post

-op)

³ 6

h a p

ost-

op

Yes

Y

es

No

Maj

or p

ain

(VA

S 7–

10)

Lum

bar/

cerv

ical

lam

inec

tom

y Y

es (

i.v. fi

rst

48

h po

st-o

p)

³ 6 h

a pos

t-op

Y

es (

if n

o PC

A c

onsi

der

slow

rel

ease

mor

phin

e pr

epar

atio

n)

Yes

(no

t with

PC

A)

No

Com

plex

maj

or p

ain

(VA

S 7–

10)

Post

erio

r sp

inal

fus

ion

thor

acic

di

scec

tom

y Y

es (

i.v. fi

rst

48

h po

st-o

p)

³ 6 h

a pos

t-op

Y

es (

if n

o PC

A c

onsi

der

slow

rel

ease

mor

phin

e pr

epar

atio

n)

Yes

(no

t with

PC

A)

Yes

a If

no n

euro

surg

ical

or

med

ical

con

trai

ndic

atio

n

702 M. Newton and T. Fernandez

Tabl

e 72

.4

Gui

delin

es f

or m

ultim

odal

ana

lges

ia f

ollo

win

g in

trac

rani

al s

urge

ry –

tim

ing

and

anal

gesi

c co

nsid

erat

ions

Po

st-o

pera

tive

peri

od

Rec

omm

ende

d an

alge

sia

(aim

for

pai

n sc

ore

£ 3)

A

nalg

esic

con

side

ratio

ns

Eva

luat

ion

of a

nalg

esia

Imm

edia

te

(1–6

0 m

in)

Intr

aven

ous

(i.v

.) p

arac

etam

ol

+/−

i.v.

mor

phin

e R

emem

ber

adju

ncts

(e.

g. p

ositi

on, c

ool p

acks

)

Seve

re p

ain

post

-cra

niot

omy

refr

acto

ry to

pa

race

tam

ol a

nd s

mal

l am

ount

s of

i.v.

m

orph

ine

shou

ld p

rom

pt f

orm

al e

xclu

sion

of

com

plic

atio

ns

Freq

uent

re-

asse

ssm

ent o

f •

Pain

sco

re

• R

espo

nse

to in

terv

entio

n •

Re-

eval

uate

ana

lges

ic d

oses

E

arly

(6

0 m

in–6

h)

Reg

ular

i.v.

par

acet

amol

1 g

6-h

ourl

y R

egul

ar o

ral o

r PC

A m

orph

ine

Rem

embe

r ad

junc

ts (

e.g.

pos

ition

, coo

l pac

ks)

Para

ceta

mol

i.v.

6-h

ourl

y fo

r fi r

st 4

8 h

post

-op

for

pain

ful s

urge

ry

Con

tinui

ng s

ever

e pa

in –

exc

lude

com

plic

atio

ns

Freq

uent

re-

asse

ssm

ent o

f •

Pain

sco

re

• R

espo

nse

to in

terv

entio

n •

Re-

eval

uate

ana

lges

ic d

oses

In

term

edia

te

(>6–

24 h

) R

egul

ar i.

v. p

arac

etam

ol 1

g 6

-hou

rly

Ora

l or

PCA

mor

phin

e R

emem

ber

adju

ncts

(e.

g. p

ositi

on, c

ool p

acks

) C

onsi

der

regu

lar :

ora

l/rec

tal/i

.v. N

SAID

s*

Para

ceta

mol

i.v.

6-h

ourl

y fo

r fi r

st 4

8 h

post

-op

for

pain

ful s

urge

ry

* NSA

IDs

see

part

icul

ar c

autio

ns r

elat

ing

to u

se

in n

euro

surg

ical

pat

ient

s C

ontin

uing

sev

ere

pain

– e

xclu

de c

ompl

icat

ions

Freq

uent

re-

asse

ssm

ent o

f •

Pain

sco

re

• R

espo

nse

to in

terv

entio

n •

Re-

eval

uate

ana

lges

ic d

oses

Lat

e (>

24 h

) R

egul

ar i.

v. p

arac

etam

ol 1

g 6

-hou

rly

Ora

l or

PCA

mor

phin

e R

emem

ber

adju

ncts

(e.

g. p

ositi

on, c

ool p

acks

) C

onsi

der

regu

lar :

ora

l/rec

tal/i

.v. N

SAID

s*

+/−

gab

apen

tin

Para

ceta

mol

i.v.

for

fi rs

t 48

h po

st-o

p fo

r pa

infu

l su

rger

y * N

SAID

s se

e pa

rtic

ular

cau

tions

rel

atin

g to

use

in

neu

rosu

rgic

al p

atie

nts

Con

tinui

ng s

ever

e pa

in –

exc

lude

com

plic

atio

ns

Con

side

r in

trod

uctio

n ga

bape

ntin

100

mg

thre

e tim

es/d

ay a

nd ti

trat

e ac

cord

ing

to r

espo

nse

Freq

uent

re-

asse

ssm

ent o

f •

Pain

sco

re

• R

espo

nse

to in

terv

entio

n •

Re-

eval

uate

ana

lges

ic d

oses

R

educ

e an

alge

sia

as p

ain

impr

oves

(op

ioid

s fi r

st)

70372 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations

Tabl

e 72

.5

Gui

delin

es f

or m

ultim

odal

ana

lges

ia f

ollo

win

g no

n-in

trac

rani

al s

urge

ry –

tim

ing

and

anal

gesi

c co

nsid

erat

ions

Po

st-o

p pe

riod

and

rec

omm

ende

d an

alge

sia

(aim

for

pai

n sc

ore

£ 3)

A

nalg

esic

con

side

ratio

ns

Eva

luat

ion

of a

nalg

esia

Imm

edia

te (

1–60

min

) in

trav

enou

s (i

.v.)

par

acet

amol

+

/− i.

v. m

orph

ine

If s

ever

e pa

in p

ersi

sts

cons

ider

: L

ow-d

ose

mid

azol

am

Clo

nidi

ne

Low

-dos

e ke

tam

ine

For

acut

e ne

urop

athi

c pa

in c

onsi

der:

D

exam

etha

sone

Mid

azol

am –

use

ful p

ost-

spin

al s

urge

ry if

oth

er a

nalg

esia

uns

ucce

ssfu

l. U

se v

ery

low

dos

e (0

.5 m

g) a

nd b

e aw

are

of in

tens

e sy

nerg

ism

w

ith o

pioi

ds

Clo

nidi

ne –

slo

w i.

v. in

crem

ents

(15

m g)

to m

axim

um 1

50 m

g.

Mon

itor

BP

care

fully

K

etam

ine

– dy

spho

ria

unlik

ely

with

ver

y lo

w b

olus

dos

e (0

.1 m

g/kg

) D

exam

etha

sone

(4–

8 m

g) –

may

be

help

ful f

or a

cute

neu

ropa

thic

pai

n.

Con

tinue

4 m

g fo

ur ti

mes

dai

ly f

or 4

8 h.

Cau

tion

in d

iabe

tes

Freq

uent

re-

asse

ssm

ent o

f •

Pain

sco

re

• R

espo

nse

to in

terv

entio

n •

Re-

eval

uate

ana

lges

ic d

oses

Se

vere

pai

n?

Con

side

r po

st-o

p co

mpl

icat

ions

Ear

ly (

60 m

in –

6 h

) A

s ab

ove

but s

ubst

itute

i.v.

mor

phin

e fo

r re

gula

r or

al o

r PC

A m

orph

ine

As

abov

e Pa

race

tam

ol i.

v. 6

hou

rly

for

fi rst

48

h po

st-o

p fo

r pa

infu

l sur

gery

A

s ab

ove

Inte

rmed

iate

( 6

–24

h)

As

abov

e C

onsi

der

regu

lar:

O

ral/r

ecta

l/i.v

. NSA

IDs*

If

sev

ere

pain

per

sist

s co

nsid

er:

Gab

apen

tin

Clo

nidi

ne

As

abov

e * N

SAID

s se

e pa

rtic

ular

cau

tions

rel

atin

g to

use

in n

euro

surg

ical

pat

ient

s (a

bove

) G

abap

enti

n –

depe

ndin

g on

age

sta

rt a

t 100

–200

mg

thre

e tim

es d

aily

and

cl

onid

ine

– st

art a

t 100

m g

oral

ly tw

ice

daily

As

abov

e

Lat

e (

24 h

) A

s ab

ove

If h

igh

opio

id r

equi

rem

ent c

onsi

der

switc

hing

to s

low

-rel

ease

for

mul

atio

n C

onsi

der

regu

lar:

O

ral b

enzo

diaz

epin

e fo

r m

uscu

lar

wou

nd p

ain

As

abov

e B

enzo

diaz

epin

e –

low

dos

e fo

r 48

–72

h, e

.g. o

ral d

iaze

pam

2 m

g th

ree

times

dai

ly

As

abov

e Se

vere

pai

n?

Con

side

r po

st-o

p co

mpl

icat

ions

C

onsi

der

redu

ctio

n in

ana

lges

ia a

s pa

in im

prov

es (

opio

ids

fi rst

)

704 M. Newton and T. Fernandez

Preventive Analgesia

This describes a reduction in post-operative pain following the administration of a drug that has an effect longer than the expected duration of that agent. There is no evidence to support the best timing of this therapy in the perioperative period. The use of NMDA receptor antagonists has been advocated as preventive analgesic regime in the context of abdominal, gynaecological, orthopaedic and dental surgery. However, general concerns remain regarding the use of ketamine in neurosurgical patients because of its effect on intracranial pressure. Recent work has suggested a similar benefi t following the use of gabapentin which would be more suitable in the context of neurosurgical interventions. Scalp blocks may provide effective and long-standing analgesia post-craniotomy; they are safe and simple to perform. As mentioned above, great care needs to be taken with the use of neuraxial opioids and local anaesthetic in spinal surgery. Potential preventive analgesic therapies that could be considered in expected ‘Major’ and ‘Complex Major Pain’ patient groups are shown in Table 72.6 .

Table 72.6 Preventive analgesic therapies that could be considered in expected ‘Major’ and ‘Complex Major Pain’ patient groups Timing of adjunct Dosage guidelines Precautions

Pre-operative Gabapentin 2 h pre-op (200–600 mg single dose, titrate dose according to age)

High-dose gabapentin may cause drowsiness. Dose reduction in renal failure

Ketamine – not for intracranial surgery Ketamine – not for intracranial surgery 5 min before skin incision –

(0.1–0.5 mg/kg) Psychosis not usually a problem

with low-dose ketamine Local anaesthetic block (LA) LA – see notes in ‘Overview’

Intraoperative ketamine – not for intracranial surgery ketamine – not for intracranial surgery (0.1–0.25 mg/kg repeated at 1 h

intervals) Psychosis not usually a problem with

low-dose ketamine Local anaesthetic block (LA) LA – see notes in ‘Overview’

Post - operative Gabapentin (divided doses 200–1,800 mg/day titrate dose according to age. Caution in renal failure)

Gabapentin – dose reduction in renal failure. Continue for 1 month post-op. Wean off over 2 weeks

Ketamine – not for intracranial surgery Ketamine – not for intracranial surgery Avoid if possible in all patients post-op Psychosis not usually a problem with

low doses (10–50 mg orally three times daily)

70572 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations

Relative Contraindications for Commonly Used Analgesics in the Neurosurgical Population

NSAIDs

The use of NSAIDs in neurosurgical patients is controversial. There are no pub-lished studies about their use in this population. Theoretically, they increase the risk of post-operative bleeding due to their inhibitory effect on platelet function, thus neurosurgeons have great concerns regarding their use, particular in the context of craniotomies and spinal surgery. Following elective supra-tentorial surgery it is highly unusual for patients to present with an intra-cranial haematoma if they have regained their pre-operative status by 6 h post-surgery. In our institution, we have applied this fi nding to our entire neurosurgical population and introduce NSAIDs after 6 h, if the post-operative course of any type of elective surgery has been uncomplicated and there is nothing to suggest a clotting disorder. Introduction of NSAIDs may be delayed in high-risk cases (e.g. spinal cord tumours, large menin-gioma resections, and ‘deep brain’ surgery).

Another concern with the use of NSAIDs is possible impairment of bone fusion (through interference with the complex regulatory system of bone formation that includes prostaglandins) which could be signifi cant following spinal fusion. There is no evidence in humans to support this.

Opioids

If used in doses just suffi cient to relieve pain, they will not signifi cantly affect respi-ratory drive, thus avoiding an increase in PaCO

2 with consequent effects on increas-

ing ICP. Careful titration is the key to the safe use of opioids. Following craniotomy very

small doses may be highly effective (e.g., 1–2 mg morphine repeated if necessary at 5 min intervals in the immediate post-operative phase followed by 5–10 mg orally at later stages). This is in contradistinction to patients in the ‘Major’ and ‘Complex Major Pain’ categories who invariably require much higher doses.

Patient-controlled analgesic (PCA) devices have been used successfully without complication following craniotomy and subarachnoid haemorrhage. For the use of morphine-PCA, some practitioners suggest low 4 h limits (e.g. 15 mg) and re-eval-uate the patient before further dose increase. Patients after major spinal surgery frequently benefi t from additional p.o. slow-release morphine preparations as sup-plementation of the PCA treatment due to more extensive pain levels; however, this requires a high level of patient supervision, such as an HDU environment. Endtidal CO

2 -feedback-control PCA devices have been introduced in an attempt to improve

patient safety when opioid self-administration is desired.

706 M. Newton and T. Fernandez

Crisis Management

Nociceptive Pain

Severe nociceptive pain is easier to treat than severe neuropathic pain. Whenever severe pain is present the cause of the pain should be actively sought. There should be a low threshold for further investigation, if it persists or is diffi cult to control. In the late post-operative phase, this may require admission to an HDU for rapid con-trol of pain by intravenous boluses of opioids and other adjuncts.

Neuropathic Pain

Neuropathic pain is classically described as aching, burning, shooting, or stabbing. It may be paroxysmal or spontaneous with no precipitating cause and may be asso-ciated with hyperalgesia or allodynia. It may be a new phenomenon post-operatively or an exacerbation of pre-existing neuropathic pain. It can be very diffi cult to relieve. Although classically resistant to opioids these should be tried to assess whether they are of any benefi t. Dexamethasone (4 mg four times daily for 48 h) can be very effective in the early post-operative phase, if oedema of nerve roots is thought a probable cause. There should be a low threshold to the introduction of gabapentin or amitriptyline if signifi cant neuropathic pain persists. Carbamazepine is the most effective treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (sometimes exacerbated following microvascular decompression) but has a poor side-effect profi le. There are success-ful reports of the use of intra-nasal sumatriptan in refractory cases of trigeminal neuralgia (caution should be exercised in patients with ischaemic heart disease).

Neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury and brachial plexus avulsion is common and can be severe. There is evidence to support benefi t from opioids, ket-amine infusion, and intravenous lidocaine. The latter two have to be administered in an HDU environment. Benzodiazepines may contribute to the management of refractory pain. Their use should be strictly short term and over-sedation and its attendant risks avoided.

Side Effects of Treatment

Constipation, nausea and so on are common post-operatively. They should be antic-ipated and active measures taken to prevent them. Several analgesic have sedative effects on the patients, particularly opioids. Awareness of the possible confounding effects of the analgesic treatment on mental status and neurologic presentation is of paramount importance in the perioperative management of neurosurgical patients. Overmedication with analgesics may result in differential diagnostic problems, which should trigger an immediate neurologic evaluation and frequently require emergency CT imaging of the cranium.

70772 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations

Suggested Reading

Acute Pain Management: Scientifi c Evidence – Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Faculty of Pain Medicine. 2nd ed. 2005.

de Gray LC, Matta BF. Acute and chronic pain following craniotomy: a review. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:693–704.

Harmer M, Davies KA. The effect of education, assessment and a standardised prescription on postoperative pain management. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:424–30.

Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006;367:1618–25.

Pandey CK, Navkar DV, Giri PJ, et al. Evaluation of the optimal preemptive dose of gabapentin for postoperative pain relief after lumbar diskectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-con-trolled study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005;17:65–8.

Taylor WA, Thomas WM, Wellings JA, Bell BA. Timing of postoperative intracranial hematoma development and implications for the best use of neurosurgical intensive care. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:48–50.

Key Points

Acute pain management education of patients/clinical staff reduces the • incidence of severe post-operative pain Post-operative pain management should be planned pre-operatively • Consider the use of preventive analgesia in relevant patient groups • Multimodal analgesia may improve the quality of analgesia and reduce the • incidence of side effects PCA has a high patient satisfaction • Be specifi c about site of pain and its potential causes • Assess pain and the effect of interventions frequently • Increasing or severe pain should prompt further investigation • Monitoring in an HDU environment may be necessary for prompt and safe • management of severe pain As pain improves focus should be provided to weaning analgesia to prevent • dependence.

top related