essentials of neurosurgical anesthesia & critical care || post-operative pain management in...
Post on 19-Dec-2016
216 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
697A.M. Brambrink and J.R. Kirsch (eds.), Essentials of Neurosurgical Anesthesia & Critical Care, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-09562-2_72, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012
Overview
The management of post-operative pain in neurosurgical patients can be challenging.
Many neurosurgical patients may be denied adequate analgesia because of the mistaken belief that opioids may mask neurological deterioration. Despite the diver-sity of neurosurgical procedures and the multiplicity of pain presentations in this population, effective and safe pain relief is possible for the vast majority of patients.
A sound knowledge of the pathophysiology underlying the neurosurgical condi-tion and an understanding of the complications associated with it are essential for optimizing safe post-operative analgesia. Many neurosurgical conditions are highly dynamic. A decrease in the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) must be carefully investi-gated as many neurosurgical complications may require urgent surgical and/or ther-apeutic intervention (Table 72.1 ). A deterioration in GCS must not be attributed solely to a relative opioid ‘overdose’ until other causes have been excluded.
Analgesia for major spinal surgery may be especially challenging. Many of these patients suffer from chronic pain and may present with a combination of nocicep-tive and neuropathic pain. A signifi cant number of these patients may be taking opioids pre-operatively. Acute on chronic pain is typically more diffi cult to manage than isolated acute pain.
M. Newton , MBBS, FRCA (*) The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery , London , UKe-mail: mary.newton@uclh.nhs.uk
T. Fernandez , MBBS, FCARCSI, FIPP, DPM Department of Anaesthetics and Pain Medicine , Imperial College Hospitals Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK
Chapter 72 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations
Mary Newton and Tacson Fernandez
698 M. Newton and T. Fernandez
Neuraxial opioids, alone or in combination with local anaesthetics, can be very effective following spinal surgery. However, the approach requires careful consider-ations; Neuroaxial local anaesthetic/opioids may be contraindicated if there is sig-nifi cant risk of an intraoperative dural tear which could result in unpredictable amounts of local anaesthetic/opioids reaching the cerebrospinal fl uid (CSF). In some centres, administration of opioids (particularly those that are long-acting and water soluble) into the CSF would commit the patient to care high dependency (HDU) care post-operatively. Additionally, local anaesthetic-induced motor block may mask neurological deterioration secondary to spinal cord compression by, for example, haematoma or tissue swelling. If this analgesic technique is used, it is imperative that the patient is monitored by nursing staff familiar with its use in this specialized population of patients. There must be a strict local protocol for the action to be taken in the event of onset of reduced limb power.
Increasing or uncontrolled pain post-operatively requires reassessment and con-sideration of alternative causes (Table 72.2 ), for example, a surgical complication or neuropathic pain.
Prevention
Pain is the fi fth vital sign and requires regular evaluation in combination with appro-priate intervention to maximize pain relief. Effective management of acute post-operative pain reduces the incidence of chronic pain; additionally, it aids early mobilization and may decrease factors associated with immobility (e.g. venous thrombosis and pulmonary atelectasis). Education of patients and clinical staff is vital to optimize acute post-operative pain management.
Table 72.1 Common causes of post-operative/post-procedure decrease in GCS
Common neurosurgical conditions Potential causes of decreasing Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
Sub-arachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) (post-clipping/post-coiling)
Re-bleed Acute hydrocephalus Cerebral vasospasm Seizure
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) Re-accumulation of haematoma Haemorrhage into contusion Oedema Seizure
Craniotomy Haematoma (sub-dural/intracerebral etc.) Oedema Seizure Air encephalocoele Infection – e.g. meningitis etc.
69972 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations
Pain Scores
Pain is a subjective experience and most measures of pain are based on self-report. Numerous pain scales exist. Descriptive scales, where pain is described as ‘none, mild, moderate or severe’ are easy to use. Numerical scores are less easy to use but are more accurate at assessing the response to an intervention. The most popular numerical scale is the visual analogue score (VAS); it consists of a 100 mm line where 0 mm correlates with no pain and 100 mm correlates with ‘worst pain pos-sible’. The patient is asked to mark the line to ‘score’ their pain. VAS ratings of > 70 mm are indicative of ‘severe pain’.
Education
Education of patients pre-operatively can help to reduce anxiety, post-operative pain, and other associated symptoms. Ideally, it should begin pre-operatively with information about the planned surgical procedure, expected pain relating to it, the hospital’s pain-scoring system (see below) and the importance of effective analge-sia to aid early mobilization to reduce the clinical risks associated with immobility. Patients should be aware of the analgesic modalities available to them; this informa-tion will need to be reinforced repeatedly in the early post-operative phase.
All clinicians involved in the post-operative care of neurosurgical patients need on-going education in acute pain management and the additional considerations for this specialist group of patients. Familiarity with the operative procedure and
Table 72.2 Post-operative complications which may increase pain Complication Cause of pain
Sub-arachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) (post-clipping/post-coiling)
Re-bleed Hydrocephalus Infection
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) Wound infection Re-accumulation of haematoma
Craniotomy Haematoma (e.g. sub-dural/intracerebral) Air encephalocoele Low ICP headache/CSF leak Infection – e.g. meningitis
Spinal decompression/fusion Nerve root compression by disc remnant/haematoma/oedema
Neuropraxia (C2 root especially common) Infection Malpositioned instrumentation Muscle spasm
Intradural/intramedullary spinal cord surgery
Wound infection Haematoma formation Meningitis Low ICP headache/CSF leak
700 M. Newton and T. Fernandez
associated complications are particularly important. Clinical staff must be familiar with the hospital’s pain-scoring system and the application of this to optimize anal-gesia. Standardized prescriptions for analgesia used in conjunction with frequent assessment of pain scores can improve post-operative pain management.
Recommended Analgesic Regimes
The World Health Organization (WHO) pain ladder (Fig. 72.1 ) describes a simplis-tic guide to the optimization of analgesia. Urgent action is required for patients in severe pain which frequently requires all three steps of the pain ladder to be initiated simultaneously, in combination with pharmacological adjuncts (Tables 72.4 and 72.5 ) and non-pharmacological adjuncts (e.g. reassurance, explanation of the cause of the pain and the intended management of it, careful positioning, cool/warm packs and eye shades). Prompt action in the provision of good pain relief reduces anxiety. Anxiety is known to exacerbate pain.
Table 72.3 is a guide to appropriate post-operative prescribing of multimodal analgesia in our unit where commonly performed neurosurgical procedures are categorized according to the predicted pain (VAS) in the post-operative period. Details of the timed introduction of multimodal analgesia for intra-cranial surgery are shown in Table 72.4 and for non-intracranial surgery in Table 72.5 .
Freedom fromcancer pain
Strong opiodwith or without
nonopiod, adjuvent
Weak opiodwith or without
nonopiod, adjuvent
Nonopiodwith or without
adjuvent
Pain persistingor increasing
Pain persistingor increasing
Pain
1
2
3
Pain medications: by the mouth by the clock by the ladder
Source: www.who.int/cancer/palliative/painladder/en
Fig. 72.1 WHO pain ladder
70172 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations
Tab
le 7
2.3
Som
e co
mm
on n
euro
surg
ical
pro
cedu
res
are
list
ed a
ccor
ding
to th
e pr
edic
ted
pain
(V
AS
) in
the
post
-ope
rativ
e pe
riod
to g
uide
app
ropr
iate
pos
t-op
erat
ive
pres
crib
ing
of m
ulti
mod
al a
nalg
esia
Pre
dict
ed p
ain
scor
es
with
out a
nalg
esia
E
xam
ples
of
surg
ical
pr
oced
ures
in th
is c
ateg
ory
Reg
ular
par
acet
amol
(a
ceto
met
ophe
n)
Reg
ular
N
SAID
a R
egul
ar o
ral
or P
CA
mor
phin
e ‘R
escu
e’ o
pioi
d if
req
uire
d
Con
side
r ph
arm
aceu
tical
ad
junc
t (T
able
72.
5 )
Min
or p
ain
(VA
S 1–
3)
Car
pal t
unne
l Y
es
Yes
N
o Y
es
No
Inte
rmed
iate
pai
n (V
AS
3–6)
C
rani
otom
y/L
umba
r m
icro
disc
ecto
my
Yes
(i.v
. fi r
st 2
4 h
post
-op)
³ 6
h a p
ost-
op
Yes
Y
es
No
Maj
or p
ain
(VA
S 7–
10)
Lum
bar/
cerv
ical
lam
inec
tom
y Y
es (
i.v. fi
rst
48
h po
st-o
p)
³ 6 h
a pos
t-op
Y
es (
if n
o PC
A c
onsi
der
slow
rel
ease
mor
phin
e pr
epar
atio
n)
Yes
(no
t with
PC
A)
No
Com
plex
maj
or p
ain
(VA
S 7–
10)
Post
erio
r sp
inal
fus
ion
thor
acic
di
scec
tom
y Y
es (
i.v. fi
rst
48
h po
st-o
p)
³ 6 h
a pos
t-op
Y
es (
if n
o PC
A c
onsi
der
slow
rel
ease
mor
phin
e pr
epar
atio
n)
Yes
(no
t with
PC
A)
Yes
a If
no n
euro
surg
ical
or
med
ical
con
trai
ndic
atio
n
702 M. Newton and T. Fernandez
Tabl
e 72
.4
Gui
delin
es f
or m
ultim
odal
ana
lges
ia f
ollo
win
g in
trac
rani
al s
urge
ry –
tim
ing
and
anal
gesi
c co
nsid
erat
ions
Po
st-o
pera
tive
peri
od
Rec
omm
ende
d an
alge
sia
(aim
for
pai
n sc
ore
£ 3)
A
nalg
esic
con
side
ratio
ns
Eva
luat
ion
of a
nalg
esia
Imm
edia
te
(1–6
0 m
in)
Intr
aven
ous
(i.v
.) p
arac
etam
ol
+/−
i.v.
mor
phin
e R
emem
ber
adju
ncts
(e.
g. p
ositi
on, c
ool p
acks
)
Seve
re p
ain
post
-cra
niot
omy
refr
acto
ry to
pa
race
tam
ol a
nd s
mal
l am
ount
s of
i.v.
m
orph
ine
shou
ld p
rom
pt f
orm
al e
xclu
sion
of
com
plic
atio
ns
Freq
uent
re-
asse
ssm
ent o
f •
Pain
sco
re
• R
espo
nse
to in
terv
entio
n •
Re-
eval
uate
ana
lges
ic d
oses
E
arly
(6
0 m
in–6
h)
Reg
ular
i.v.
par
acet
amol
1 g
6-h
ourl
y R
egul
ar o
ral o
r PC
A m
orph
ine
Rem
embe
r ad
junc
ts (
e.g.
pos
ition
, coo
l pac
ks)
Para
ceta
mol
i.v.
6-h
ourl
y fo
r fi r
st 4
8 h
post
-op
for
pain
ful s
urge
ry
Con
tinui
ng s
ever
e pa
in –
exc
lude
com
plic
atio
ns
Freq
uent
re-
asse
ssm
ent o
f •
Pain
sco
re
• R
espo
nse
to in
terv
entio
n •
Re-
eval
uate
ana
lges
ic d
oses
In
term
edia
te
(>6–
24 h
) R
egul
ar i.
v. p
arac
etam
ol 1
g 6
-hou
rly
Ora
l or
PCA
mor
phin
e R
emem
ber
adju
ncts
(e.
g. p
ositi
on, c
ool p
acks
) C
onsi
der
regu
lar :
ora
l/rec
tal/i
.v. N
SAID
s*
Para
ceta
mol
i.v.
6-h
ourl
y fo
r fi r
st 4
8 h
post
-op
for
pain
ful s
urge
ry
* NSA
IDs
see
part
icul
ar c
autio
ns r
elat
ing
to u
se
in n
euro
surg
ical
pat
ient
s C
ontin
uing
sev
ere
pain
– e
xclu
de c
ompl
icat
ions
Freq
uent
re-
asse
ssm
ent o
f •
Pain
sco
re
• R
espo
nse
to in
terv
entio
n •
Re-
eval
uate
ana
lges
ic d
oses
Lat
e (>
24 h
) R
egul
ar i.
v. p
arac
etam
ol 1
g 6
-hou
rly
Ora
l or
PCA
mor
phin
e R
emem
ber
adju
ncts
(e.
g. p
ositi
on, c
ool p
acks
) C
onsi
der
regu
lar :
ora
l/rec
tal/i
.v. N
SAID
s*
+/−
gab
apen
tin
Para
ceta
mol
i.v.
for
fi rs
t 48
h po
st-o
p fo
r pa
infu
l su
rger
y * N
SAID
s se
e pa
rtic
ular
cau
tions
rel
atin
g to
use
in
neu
rosu
rgic
al p
atie
nts
Con
tinui
ng s
ever
e pa
in –
exc
lude
com
plic
atio
ns
Con
side
r in
trod
uctio
n ga
bape
ntin
100
mg
thre
e tim
es/d
ay a
nd ti
trat
e ac
cord
ing
to r
espo
nse
Freq
uent
re-
asse
ssm
ent o
f •
Pain
sco
re
• R
espo
nse
to in
terv
entio
n •
Re-
eval
uate
ana
lges
ic d
oses
R
educ
e an
alge
sia
as p
ain
impr
oves
(op
ioid
s fi r
st)
70372 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations
Tabl
e 72
.5
Gui
delin
es f
or m
ultim
odal
ana
lges
ia f
ollo
win
g no
n-in
trac
rani
al s
urge
ry –
tim
ing
and
anal
gesi
c co
nsid
erat
ions
Po
st-o
p pe
riod
and
rec
omm
ende
d an
alge
sia
(aim
for
pai
n sc
ore
£ 3)
A
nalg
esic
con
side
ratio
ns
Eva
luat
ion
of a
nalg
esia
Imm
edia
te (
1–60
min
) in
trav
enou
s (i
.v.)
par
acet
amol
+
/− i.
v. m
orph
ine
If s
ever
e pa
in p
ersi
sts
cons
ider
: L
ow-d
ose
mid
azol
am
Clo
nidi
ne
Low
-dos
e ke
tam
ine
For
acut
e ne
urop
athi
c pa
in c
onsi
der:
D
exam
etha
sone
Mid
azol
am –
use
ful p
ost-
spin
al s
urge
ry if
oth
er a
nalg
esia
uns
ucce
ssfu
l. U
se v
ery
low
dos
e (0
.5 m
g) a
nd b
e aw
are
of in
tens
e sy
nerg
ism
w
ith o
pioi
ds
Clo
nidi
ne –
slo
w i.
v. in
crem
ents
(15
m g)
to m
axim
um 1
50 m
g.
Mon
itor
BP
care
fully
K
etam
ine
– dy
spho
ria
unlik
ely
with
ver
y lo
w b
olus
dos
e (0
.1 m
g/kg
) D
exam
etha
sone
(4–
8 m
g) –
may
be
help
ful f
or a
cute
neu
ropa
thic
pai
n.
Con
tinue
4 m
g fo
ur ti
mes
dai
ly f
or 4
8 h.
Cau
tion
in d
iabe
tes
Freq
uent
re-
asse
ssm
ent o
f •
Pain
sco
re
• R
espo
nse
to in
terv
entio
n •
Re-
eval
uate
ana
lges
ic d
oses
Se
vere
pai
n?
Con
side
r po
st-o
p co
mpl
icat
ions
Ear
ly (
60 m
in –
6 h
) A
s ab
ove
but s
ubst
itute
i.v.
mor
phin
e fo
r re
gula
r or
al o
r PC
A m
orph
ine
As
abov
e Pa
race
tam
ol i.
v. 6
hou
rly
for
fi rst
48
h po
st-o
p fo
r pa
infu
l sur
gery
A
s ab
ove
Inte
rmed
iate
( 6
–24
h)
As
abov
e C
onsi
der
regu
lar:
O
ral/r
ecta
l/i.v
. NSA
IDs*
If
sev
ere
pain
per
sist
s co
nsid
er:
Gab
apen
tin
Clo
nidi
ne
As
abov
e * N
SAID
s se
e pa
rtic
ular
cau
tions
rel
atin
g to
use
in n
euro
surg
ical
pat
ient
s (a
bove
) G
abap
enti
n –
depe
ndin
g on
age
sta
rt a
t 100
–200
mg
thre
e tim
es d
aily
and
cl
onid
ine
– st
art a
t 100
m g
oral
ly tw
ice
daily
As
abov
e
Lat
e (
24 h
) A
s ab
ove
If h
igh
opio
id r
equi
rem
ent c
onsi
der
switc
hing
to s
low
-rel
ease
for
mul
atio
n C
onsi
der
regu
lar:
O
ral b
enzo
diaz
epin
e fo
r m
uscu
lar
wou
nd p
ain
As
abov
e B
enzo
diaz
epin
e –
low
dos
e fo
r 48
–72
h, e
.g. o
ral d
iaze
pam
2 m
g th
ree
times
dai
ly
As
abov
e Se
vere
pai
n?
Con
side
r po
st-o
p co
mpl
icat
ions
C
onsi
der
redu
ctio
n in
ana
lges
ia a
s pa
in im
prov
es (
opio
ids
fi rst
)
704 M. Newton and T. Fernandez
Preventive Analgesia
This describes a reduction in post-operative pain following the administration of a drug that has an effect longer than the expected duration of that agent. There is no evidence to support the best timing of this therapy in the perioperative period. The use of NMDA receptor antagonists has been advocated as preventive analgesic regime in the context of abdominal, gynaecological, orthopaedic and dental surgery. However, general concerns remain regarding the use of ketamine in neurosurgical patients because of its effect on intracranial pressure. Recent work has suggested a similar benefi t following the use of gabapentin which would be more suitable in the context of neurosurgical interventions. Scalp blocks may provide effective and long-standing analgesia post-craniotomy; they are safe and simple to perform. As mentioned above, great care needs to be taken with the use of neuraxial opioids and local anaesthetic in spinal surgery. Potential preventive analgesic therapies that could be considered in expected ‘Major’ and ‘Complex Major Pain’ patient groups are shown in Table 72.6 .
Table 72.6 Preventive analgesic therapies that could be considered in expected ‘Major’ and ‘Complex Major Pain’ patient groups Timing of adjunct Dosage guidelines Precautions
Pre-operative Gabapentin 2 h pre-op (200–600 mg single dose, titrate dose according to age)
High-dose gabapentin may cause drowsiness. Dose reduction in renal failure
Ketamine – not for intracranial surgery Ketamine – not for intracranial surgery 5 min before skin incision –
(0.1–0.5 mg/kg) Psychosis not usually a problem
with low-dose ketamine Local anaesthetic block (LA) LA – see notes in ‘Overview’
Intraoperative ketamine – not for intracranial surgery ketamine – not for intracranial surgery (0.1–0.25 mg/kg repeated at 1 h
intervals) Psychosis not usually a problem with
low-dose ketamine Local anaesthetic block (LA) LA – see notes in ‘Overview’
Post - operative Gabapentin (divided doses 200–1,800 mg/day titrate dose according to age. Caution in renal failure)
Gabapentin – dose reduction in renal failure. Continue for 1 month post-op. Wean off over 2 weeks
Ketamine – not for intracranial surgery Ketamine – not for intracranial surgery Avoid if possible in all patients post-op Psychosis not usually a problem with
low doses (10–50 mg orally three times daily)
70572 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations
Relative Contraindications for Commonly Used Analgesics in the Neurosurgical Population
NSAIDs
The use of NSAIDs in neurosurgical patients is controversial. There are no pub-lished studies about their use in this population. Theoretically, they increase the risk of post-operative bleeding due to their inhibitory effect on platelet function, thus neurosurgeons have great concerns regarding their use, particular in the context of craniotomies and spinal surgery. Following elective supra-tentorial surgery it is highly unusual for patients to present with an intra-cranial haematoma if they have regained their pre-operative status by 6 h post-surgery. In our institution, we have applied this fi nding to our entire neurosurgical population and introduce NSAIDs after 6 h, if the post-operative course of any type of elective surgery has been uncomplicated and there is nothing to suggest a clotting disorder. Introduction of NSAIDs may be delayed in high-risk cases (e.g. spinal cord tumours, large menin-gioma resections, and ‘deep brain’ surgery).
Another concern with the use of NSAIDs is possible impairment of bone fusion (through interference with the complex regulatory system of bone formation that includes prostaglandins) which could be signifi cant following spinal fusion. There is no evidence in humans to support this.
Opioids
If used in doses just suffi cient to relieve pain, they will not signifi cantly affect respi-ratory drive, thus avoiding an increase in PaCO
2 with consequent effects on increas-
ing ICP. Careful titration is the key to the safe use of opioids. Following craniotomy very
small doses may be highly effective (e.g., 1–2 mg morphine repeated if necessary at 5 min intervals in the immediate post-operative phase followed by 5–10 mg orally at later stages). This is in contradistinction to patients in the ‘Major’ and ‘Complex Major Pain’ categories who invariably require much higher doses.
Patient-controlled analgesic (PCA) devices have been used successfully without complication following craniotomy and subarachnoid haemorrhage. For the use of morphine-PCA, some practitioners suggest low 4 h limits (e.g. 15 mg) and re-eval-uate the patient before further dose increase. Patients after major spinal surgery frequently benefi t from additional p.o. slow-release morphine preparations as sup-plementation of the PCA treatment due to more extensive pain levels; however, this requires a high level of patient supervision, such as an HDU environment. Endtidal CO
2 -feedback-control PCA devices have been introduced in an attempt to improve
patient safety when opioid self-administration is desired.
706 M. Newton and T. Fernandez
Crisis Management
Nociceptive Pain
Severe nociceptive pain is easier to treat than severe neuropathic pain. Whenever severe pain is present the cause of the pain should be actively sought. There should be a low threshold for further investigation, if it persists or is diffi cult to control. In the late post-operative phase, this may require admission to an HDU for rapid con-trol of pain by intravenous boluses of opioids and other adjuncts.
Neuropathic Pain
Neuropathic pain is classically described as aching, burning, shooting, or stabbing. It may be paroxysmal or spontaneous with no precipitating cause and may be asso-ciated with hyperalgesia or allodynia. It may be a new phenomenon post-operatively or an exacerbation of pre-existing neuropathic pain. It can be very diffi cult to relieve. Although classically resistant to opioids these should be tried to assess whether they are of any benefi t. Dexamethasone (4 mg four times daily for 48 h) can be very effective in the early post-operative phase, if oedema of nerve roots is thought a probable cause. There should be a low threshold to the introduction of gabapentin or amitriptyline if signifi cant neuropathic pain persists. Carbamazepine is the most effective treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (sometimes exacerbated following microvascular decompression) but has a poor side-effect profi le. There are success-ful reports of the use of intra-nasal sumatriptan in refractory cases of trigeminal neuralgia (caution should be exercised in patients with ischaemic heart disease).
Neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury and brachial plexus avulsion is common and can be severe. There is evidence to support benefi t from opioids, ket-amine infusion, and intravenous lidocaine. The latter two have to be administered in an HDU environment. Benzodiazepines may contribute to the management of refractory pain. Their use should be strictly short term and over-sedation and its attendant risks avoided.
Side Effects of Treatment
Constipation, nausea and so on are common post-operatively. They should be antic-ipated and active measures taken to prevent them. Several analgesic have sedative effects on the patients, particularly opioids. Awareness of the possible confounding effects of the analgesic treatment on mental status and neurologic presentation is of paramount importance in the perioperative management of neurosurgical patients. Overmedication with analgesics may result in differential diagnostic problems, which should trigger an immediate neurologic evaluation and frequently require emergency CT imaging of the cranium.
70772 Post-operative Pain Management in Patients After Neurosurgical Operations
Suggested Reading
Acute Pain Management: Scientifi c Evidence – Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Faculty of Pain Medicine. 2nd ed. 2005.
de Gray LC, Matta BF. Acute and chronic pain following craniotomy: a review. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:693–704.
Harmer M, Davies KA. The effect of education, assessment and a standardised prescription on postoperative pain management. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:424–30.
Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006;367:1618–25.
Pandey CK, Navkar DV, Giri PJ, et al. Evaluation of the optimal preemptive dose of gabapentin for postoperative pain relief after lumbar diskectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-con-trolled study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005;17:65–8.
Taylor WA, Thomas WM, Wellings JA, Bell BA. Timing of postoperative intracranial hematoma development and implications for the best use of neurosurgical intensive care. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:48–50.
Key Points
Acute pain management education of patients/clinical staff reduces the • incidence of severe post-operative pain Post-operative pain management should be planned pre-operatively • Consider the use of preventive analgesia in relevant patient groups • Multimodal analgesia may improve the quality of analgesia and reduce the • incidence of side effects PCA has a high patient satisfaction • Be specifi c about site of pain and its potential causes • Assess pain and the effect of interventions frequently • Increasing or severe pain should prompt further investigation • Monitoring in an HDU environment may be necessary for prompt and safe • management of severe pain As pain improves focus should be provided to weaning analgesia to prevent • dependence.
top related