gated communities worksession board of county commissioners october 30, 2007
Post on 16-Jan-2016
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Gated Communities Worksession
Board of County CommissionersOctober 30, 2007
• Discussion of New Gated Communities
• Discussion does not address:
• Faux Gates
• Conversion of Existing Public Subdivisions
SCOPE
• Overview
• Legal Issues
• Infrastructure Issues
• Recommendations
• Requested Action
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Overview
• Legal Issues
• Infrastructure Issues
• Recommendations
• Requested Action
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Definition of Gated Community
• Subdivision with privately owned and maintained infrastructure
OVERVIEW
• 1970-1980 - Gated Communities sporadically approved
• 1996 - Gated Community Resolution #96-M-22
• 2000 - Incorporation of Gated Community
requirements into Subdivision
Regulations
• 2002 - Gated Community Ordinance Revisions
• 2004 - Hurricanes
• 2005 - BCC directs staff not to process requests
for Gated Communities without a
justification
History
OVERVIEW
OVERVIEW
History
Gated Communities approved since 2005:
• Foothills of Mount Dora/Stoneybrook Hills• Eagle Creek• Isles of Lake Hancock• Keene’s Point• Waterstone
Overview
Number of Gated Communities
• 244 Existing Gated Community Plats
• 141 Existing Gated Communities Governed by a
Separate Mandatory HOA
Orange County Gated Community Locations
OVERVIEW
Interconnectivity• Comprehensive Policy Plan
• Pedestrian/School Buses
• Existing Subdivision Regulations
OVERVIEW
Orange County Comprehensive Policy PlanTransportation Element
• Policy 2.1.1.4 - Orange County shall require the
local street network to be designed to promote
interconnectivity and to allow access between
neighborhoods. Proposed gated communities and
private streets will be evaluated on a case by case
basis for appropriateness.
OVERVIEW
Pedestrian/School Buses• Entrance to each gated
community ison a case-by-casebasis
OVERVIEW
Existing Subdivision RegulationsSec. 34-173. Continuation of existing street pattern.
The proposed street layout shall be coordinated with the street system of the surrounding area. Streets in the proposed subdivision shall be connected to dedicated streets in adjacent areas where required to provide for proper traffic circulation. Street stubs to contiguous platted but unbuilt streets shall be provided when required to give access to such areas or to provide for proper future traffic circulation. Street stubs in excess of two hundred fifty (250) feet which provide lot access shall be provided with a temporary cul-de-sac turn around. The subdivision developer of the contiguous area shall pay the cost of restoring the street to its original design cross-section and extending the street.
OVERVIEW
Horizon West Map
OVERVIEW
Horizon West PolicyVillage Code, Section 38-3182(g)(3)
The adopted SAP shall provide for a circulation pattern of
fully connected and integrated streets, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities to reinforce the sense of community as
required by the village classification policies. However,
gated streets may be permitted only on the periphery of the
village, or within developments which are substantially
isolated by conservation areas and/or natural water bodies
or the location of such does not interfere with the
movement of traffic from other developments to the
neighborhood center, village center, schools or access and
arterial roads serving the village. Such gated streets may
restrict vehicular movement only.
OVERVIEW
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Overview
• Legal Issues
• Infrastructure Issues
• Recommendations
• Requested Action
• Applicable State Law
• Existing Ordinance
• Federal Regulations
LEGAL ISSUES
Applicable State Law
• Florida Constitution:
Article VII, Section 10 of the Florida Constitution prohibits using public funds for private purposes
• Florida Statutes:
Section 316.006(3)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that County may exercise traffic control jurisdiction over private roads with agreement between County and HOA that includes reimbursement for cost of traffic law enforcement
• Florida Case Law:
No applicable case law
LEGAL ISSUES
Existing Ordinance
Generally:
• Gated Communities are a privilege, not a right,
of developer and property owners
• Must meet minimum standards of subdivision
regulations
• Substantial compliance with Gated Community
Ordinance required to give contract right to
develop gated community and HOA right to
keep subdivision as gated community
LEGAL ISSUES
Existing Ordinance
Requirements
• Must provide for fire/rescue, sheriff, utilities access
• Must execute Traffic Law Enforcement Agreement
LEGAL ISSUES
Existing OrdinanceDeclaration Requirements
• Turn over control of HOA to homeowners between 70% and 90% Certificates of Occupancy (COs) issued
• Turn over infrastructure to HOA between 70% and 90% COs issued
• Developer pays for maintenance of infrastructure prior to turnover
• Developer must hire engineer to inspect infrastructure prior to turnover and make necessary repairs
LEGAL ISSUES
Existing OrdinanceDeclaration Requirements Continued
• Requires HOA to hire engineer to inspect
infrastructure and report every three years
(report goes to each homeowner)
• Requires HOA to make repairs identified in
engineer’s report
• Requires disclosure to initial buyer of estimated
assessments for required HOA accounts
LEGAL ISSUES
Existing OrdinanceDeclaration Requirements Continued
• Gives HOA right to enforce Gated Community
Ordinance and Declaration requirements against
Developer and/or HOA
• Requires disclosure statement regarding gated
community requirements and information to initial
purchaser
LEGAL ISSUES
Existing OrdinanceDeclaration Requirements Continued
• Required accounts
• Routine-infrastructure maintenance account
• Capital-repair/streets account
• Capital-repair/drainage pond account
• Capital-repair/other infrastructure account
• Requires annual financial statement to be submitted to each homeowner
LEGAL ISSUES
Federal Regulations
• “No assistance will be provided to an individual
or private organization or to an eligible
applicant [such as a local government] for
reimbursement of an individual or private
organization…” 44 C.F.R. Sec. 206.224 (c).
• FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency)
policy is no reimbursement for storm debris
removal from private property
LEGAL ISSUES
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Overview
• Legal Issues
• Infrastructure Issues
• Recommendations
• Requested Action
INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES
• Roads and Drainage
• Reporting
Requirements
• Ability to Pay for
Maintenance
and Repairs
• Combined Drainage
Facilities
Roads and Drainage – Public Subdivisions
• Routine Maintenance and Repairs by County
• Major Maintenance and Repairs:
Pond Cleaning, Drainage Pipe/Culvert Repairs,
Resurfacing can be
Performed by Operating
Budget or CIP
• Emergency Response:
Debris Removal and
Flooding
INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES
Roads and Drainage – Gated Communities
• Expenditure Restriction Limits County
Responses to Infrastructure Problems
• The County cannot repair or maintain the
following in a Gated Community:• Roadways • Drainage Pipes and Culverts• Retention Ponds• Inlets and Structures• Traffic Signs• Sidewalks
INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES
Ability to Pay for Maintenance and Repairs:
Gated Community HOA Must Depend on Their Own
Expertise or Pay for That of Others
Limited By:• Number of Lots
• Expertise of Management Company
• Expertise of Board of Directors
• Adequate Financing of Maintenance And Reserve
Funds
INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES
Reporting Requirements
Gated Community Ordinance Requires an
Engineering Report Every 3 Years
• Prior to turn over to the HOA an Engineering
Report is Submitted to the County
• After infrastructure is turned over to the HOA
• After 2002 Revision, 3-year Engineering Report
submitted to Homeowners only
• Financial Reports submitted to Homeowners
INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES
Combined Drainage Facilities• Joint Use of Public And Private Stormwater
Management Systems
• Found in Planned Developments and Partnership Arrangements
• Use of Same Conveyance Pipes and Retention Ponds
• Issues with Maintenance Responsibilities
• Maintenance Cost Allocation
• Separate Systems May Result in Increased Area for Stormwater System/Decreased Density
INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Overview
• Legal Issues
• Infrastructure Issues
• Recommendations
• Requested Action
Recommended Requirements for Approving
Gated Communities:
•Separate Retention Systems
•New Debris Condition
•Interconnectivity/Horizon West
RECOMMENDATION
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Overview
• Legal Issues
• Infrastructure Issues
• Recommendations
• Requested Action
REQUESTED ACTION
• Direct staff to continue bringing only those Gated Communities with justification to BCC
Requested Action; Board Direction
• Direct staff to resume bringing all Gated Communities to BCC
or
Further Board Direction:
•Revise Ordinance
•Process Previously Denied Projects Upon
Request
RECOMMENDATION
Gated Communities Worksession
Board of County CommissionersOctober 30, 2007
top related