gestion de crise en ligne

Gestion de crise en ligne

Identifier et connaître les canaux

McDonald’s

Kit Kat Greenpeace Palm Oil lobbying

Greenpeace - Kit Kat Palm Oil lobbying

• 17th March 2010 - UK Greenpeace posted a gory parody video of the standard Kit Kat – Take A Break ad, showing an office worker gnawing on an orangutan’s finger instead of a Kit Kat bar, and the tag line “Kit Kat Killer”

• The aim was to get Nestlé to stop buying unsustainable palm oil from Sinar Mas, a global supplier that was destroying the south east Asian rainforests where orangutan’s were being threatened

• The campaign took off globally, with many people posting boycott Kit Kat messages on Twitter, YouTube and Facebook.

• The Nestlé Facebook page was overrun with people begging Nestlé to stop using palm oil and killing the orangutans. Nestlé deleted the messaging and responded with angry comments faced additional backlash for handling their social badly

• Greenpeace globally used other peaceful demonstrations on and offline• By 20th May 2010, only 10 weeks later, Nestlé announced it would stop sourcing

the unsustainable palm oil, a huge victory for Greenpeace and social networking

Nestlé & Greenpeace Learnings• Greenpeace campaign succeeded in taking down the sentiment of KitKat to an extremely low

level

• Nestlé gave fuel to the campaign by having the YouTube video banned initially, causing international news services to pick it up, and giving the campaign oxygen (it went viral soon after)

• Nestlé did not pro-actively respond using any social media, instead deleted Facebook comments and posted angry status updates around the use of the Nestlé logo by people within Facebook who wanted to bring awareness to the Greenpeace campaign, which caused even more uproar

• Nestlé failure in social and its lack of social crisis management contributed significantly in Greenpeace success in the social campaigning

• Two Australian specific tactical campaigns for KitKat - Desk Jockey and Take Back Time were launched early June to combat the negative impact of Greenpeace on the brand, but did not get enough traction to offset the overall decrease in brand sentiment until well after the capitulation of Nestlé

RTS

Repondre sur le meme canal

Comprendre enjeux et cibles

Repertorier et organiser les messages qui circulent

Etre transparent

La redoute

Osez les excuses• Simplicité• Authenticité• Valeurs• Solutions

repondre• Reactivité: dire que l’on a entendu• Ne pas mettre d’huile sur le feu• Ne pas chercher à avoir le dernier mot• Etre factuel• Etre de bonne foi• Dialoguer• Respecter les engagements pris

Principes de gestion

• Connaissance des communautés• Intégration• Personnalisation• Ethique• Réactivité• Proactivité• Adaptation

@yan_luong

Connaître ses communautés

@yan_luong

@yan_luong

Intégration

@yan_luong

@yan_luong

Personnalisation

@yan_luong

@yan_luong

Ethique

@yan_luong

@yan_luong

@yan_luong

Réactivité

@yan_luong

@yan_luong

Proactivité

@yan_luong

Monitoring

In which country do do

people talk about EPFL vs

ETHZ?

In which language do do

people talk about EPFL vs

ETHZ?

Which blogs do talk about

ETHZ?

@yan_luong

@yan_luong