kartik chandrasekhar ramon fuentes daniel tomilson andy cuming adam taylor jeff chan

Post on 11-Dec-2015

224 Views

Category:

Documents

3 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Kartik Chandrasekhar

Ramon Fuentes

Daniel Tomilson

Andy Cuming

Adam Taylor

Jeff Chan

GROUP 6

Introduction goes here

The selection process

• Design requirements - Maximum stiffness/weight ratio - Minimum cost - Easy manufacture

What we’re aiming for

Cost

Stiffness/Weight

A bit about nanotubes????

Composite SandwichPros:• Provides descent stiffness/weight• Easy to manufacture• Good crack dissipation• Cheap

Cons:• Foam/honeycomb provide better stiffness/weight ratio• Does not fully use the 3cm available

Our Fibre Metal Laminate

Al 2024

Al Mesh (crack dissipation)Carbon Fibre Weave

Al 2024

Al 2024CFweave

CFweave

Al 2024

Foam and other cores.. Why not?

Conclusion

References:o N. Sharma et al, Fatigue of Foam and Honeycomb Core Composite Sandwich

Structures: A Tutorial, Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, SAGE Publications

o Robert M. Jones, Mechanics of Composite Materials, Brunner-Routledgeo J. Gere et al, Mechanics of Materials, Cengage Learning TM

top related