mediation advocacy - callahan dispute resolutionmediation advocacy techniques that work as relates...
Post on 06-Mar-2021
6 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
12/15/2016
1
MEDIATION ADVOCACYMEDIATIONADVOCACYHowtogetthemostoutofyournextmediation
October18,2016RebeccaCallahan,Presenter
Speaker– RebeccaCallahanRebecca is a full-time mediator / arbitrator with offices in Newport Beach, California. She also does work as a mediation / arbitration
l Sh i b f h A i consultant. She is a member of the American Arbitration Association’s commercial mediation and arbitration panels. Her area of expertise is business disputes.
Rebecca earned a master’s degree in dispute resolution from the Straus Institute where she is an adjunct professor. She earned her law j pdegree from UC Berkeley (Boalt Hall) and her undergraduate degree from USC.
For more information, please visit Rebecca’s website at www.callahanADR.com.
2
12/15/2016
2
Program Topics:
1. Mediatorselection
2. Advocacyinthecontextofmediatingthelitigateddispute
3. Preparationtechniquesthatworktoadvancethemediationprocessorpromotesettlement
4. Advocacytechniquesthatdon’tworktoadvancethemediationprocessorpromotesettlement
5. Whydoesanyofthismatter?
3
6. Finalthoughtsreaxiomsthatexplainwhymediationasanalternativetolitigation/arbitrationworks
7. Q&A
Program Goals:Ihopeyouwillleavetoday’sprogramswithsomenewideasabouthowto:
(1) use mediation(1) usemediation,
(2) selectthemediator
(3) “read”themediatorandenlisthis/herhelp
4
12/15/2016
3
Program Handouts:
CallahanArticleonMediationAdvocacy
CallahanArticleonReservationPoints
Callahan“PlanforSuccess”– PreparationChecklist
CallahanArticleonSpecialRulesforMediatedSettlementAgreements
KiserStudyArticlehttp://www.adrmediate.com/docs/Susan_Hammer_OSB%20Bulletin_Feb‐Mar09.pdf
5
p
Playboyv.SheppardMullinArticlehttps://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Leave%20the%20Odds%20for%20Vegas%20July%2010%202015.pdf
Dispute Resolution Continuum
Do nothing / stick head in the
Take matters into own handsPrivate hearing w/
neutral selected by parties / Judge
Private / Party‐controlled process &
outcome
Facilitated / Private / Party‐
controlled process & outcome / Parties select
neutral
Private trial / Party‐controlled
process / Arbitrator decides outcome / Parties select Arbitrator
Public trial / No party control of process / Judge
decides outcome / Parties have no say in who judge is
sand parties / Judge decides outcomeCCP §§ 638 & 639
6
12/15/2016
4
“Iftheonlytoolyouhaveisahammer,youtendtoseeeveryproblemasanail.”
‐ AbrahamMaslow
Weoftenhammerawayatthesameoldproblems in the same old way because weproblemsinthesameoldwaybecauseweknowofnootherway.
7
Selecting the MediatorThisisanimportantdecision.Whilemediatorshavenopowertodecidethedispute,theyhavetremendousinfluenceovertheprocessandtheoutcomebecausethey:y
Provideanalyticalinput
Directandredirectthe“conversation”
Makeproposalsandsuggestionsaboutsettlementoptions
Carrymessagesbetween/amongthepartiesthatarefrequentlyreframed,colored,filtered,edited,etc.
8
Receivesecretinformationincaucuswhich,whilenotsharedwiththeotherside,mightinfluencetheirreframinganddirectionefforts
Offeropinions,recommendations,suggestions,viewsinanefforttomoveoneorbothorallpartiesoffoftheirpositions
12/15/2016
5
Problem Definition
SelectingtheMediator
Narrow Broad
Legal Issuesbargaining in the shadow
of the law
Interests & Needsbargaining based on what the parties want or needof the law
backwards lookingthe parties want or need
to have addressed or accommodated today in
order to say “yes”forward looking
9
Problem Definition
SelectingtheMediator
Narrow BroadLegal Issues
EconomicIssues
PersonalInterests
EconomicInterests
SocietalInterests
10
12/15/2016
6
Mediator Role
Evaluative- order
SelectingtheMediator
- order
- recommend
- educate about what others have done
- ask permission
- offer a suggestion
Facilitative- never provide substantive input
- wait to be asked
ask permission
11
Evaluative- order
- recommend
SelectingtheMediator
recommend
- educate about what others have done
- ask permission
BroadNarrowLegal Issues -
bargaining in the shadowof the law
Interests & Needs -what the parties want or
need to have addressed or accommodated today in
- offer a suggestion
Facilitative- never provide substantive input
- wait to be asked accommodated today in order to say “yes”
12
12/15/2016
7
Th d fi iti f “ d ”
AdvocacyintheContextofMediatingtheLitigatedDispute
Thedefinitionof“advocacy”ispleading,advancing,
championingorsupportingacauseorproposal.
13
Formediationtosucceedinachievinganegotiatedresolutionofthedispute,thereneedstobeaconstructive dialogueabouttheproblemandpersuasiveconversation aboutpossible
AdvocacyintheContextofMediatingtheLitigatedDispute
1. thelitigationalternative&howitcomparestothepossiblesolutions
2. theuncertaintiesofthelitigationoutcome3. theuncontrollables associatedwiththelitigationprocess,the
marketplaceorlifeingeneral4 h i k h d h l i l i
p p psettlementoptionsorterms – includingsuchthingsas
4. otherrisksthatareattendanttotheno‐resolutionalternative5. lostopportunitycosts6. what’sinitfortheotherside7. whythenegotiatedoutcomepossibilitymakessenseunder
thecircumstancesathand
14
12/15/2016
8
Mediatorsdon’tsettlecases….
Partiesdo.
AdvocacyintheContextofMediatingtheLitigatedDispute
Nomediatorhaseverpaidtheconsiderationorsignedthereleaseorotherwiselivedwiththeconsequencesofasettlement.
Whatmediatorsdoiscreateani t i hi h th tienvironmentinwhichtheparties
andtheirattorneyscandotheirbestjobofnegotiating,andthentheyhelpfacilitatethosediscussions.
15
1. Planforwhoneedstobeatthemediation totellthestory
MediationAdvocacyTechniquesthatWork
toexplainthetheoryofthecase totalknumbers tomakein‐gameadjustmentstothepre‐mediationcase
evaluation tomakein‐gameadjustmentstothesettlementgoals
definedinadvanceofthemediation tomaketheultimatedecisionre“deal”or“nodeal”to a e t e u t ate dec s o e dea o o dea tobearresponsibilityforthe“deal”or“nodeal”decision
16
12/15/2016
9
2. Givesomethoughttowhenistherighttimetositdownandtrytotalkaboutsettlement?
MediationAdvocacyTechniquesthatWork
beforeorafterthefilingofthelawsuit beforethecaseis“atissue” beforediscoveryistaken/completed beforeorafterthehearingonadispositivemotion beforeorafterreachingimpasseinyourprivate
negotiationefforts
Q:Istheresomethinggoingonintheclient’sortheotherside’slifeorbusinessthatwouldpromoteordisincentivizesettlementdiscussionsatthismomentintime?Atsomefuturemomentintime?
17
3. Setarealisticsettlementnumberthatisbaseduponsomethingmorethanthepredictedtrialoutcome.*
MediationAdvocacyTechniquesthatWork
Identifyrisksthatareavoidedbysettlingandassignavaluethatisthensubtractedfrom(Plaintiff)oraddedto(Defendant)thepredictedjudgmentvalue.
Dothisanalysisbothways sothatyoucanhaveapersuasivediscussionaboutwhytheothersideshouldchangeitspositioninyourfavor.
*ThereisempiricalevidencethroughtheKiserStudythatattorneysarenot verygoodatpredictingoutcomesattrial.Handout.
18
12/15/2016
10
Ifthesubjectmatterofthedisputeconcernspropertythathasafluctuatingmarketvalue,whatisthevalueofcappingthat loss / capturing that value today? By what degree
Somepossibleconsiderations…
thatloss/capturingthatvaluetoday?Bywhatdegreemightthemarketchangetoyourdisadvantagependingtheoutcomeattrial?
Ifthecaseturnsontheavailabilityandtestimonyofathirdpartywitness,whatisthevalueofavoidingtheriskthatthewitnesswillorwon’tshowup?willorwon’ttestifyinyourclient’sfavor?
Ifthecaseturnsuponwhothejudgeorjurybelieve,whatisthevalueofavoidingtheriskthatthejudgeorjuryrejectsyourclient’s/yourexpert’stestimony?
19
Ifthecaseinvolvescomplicatedfactsand/orlegalissues,whatisthevalueofavoidingtheriskthatthejudgeorjurymakesamistakeorgetsconfusedonakeyissue?What’sthevalueofavoidingthetimeandexpenseofanappeal?
Ifthecaseisripeforsummaryadjudication,whatisthevalueofavoidingtheexpenseandpotentialadverserulingsassociatedwithsuchproceedings?
Whatisthevalueofrecoveringmoneytodayversus3or5or10yearsinthefuture?
Whatisthevalueofopportunitieslostornotbeingpursuedbecauseofthetime,moneyandotherresourcesbeingallocatedtothelitigation?
20
12/15/2016
11
4. Bepreparedtotalkturkey!(A) Ifyou’retheplaintiff,prepareanitemizationofdamagesandexplain/substantiatethefactualbasisforthosedamages,especially
MediationAdvocacyTechniquesthatWork
asrelatestopunitive,exemplary,emotionaldistressandconsequentialdamages.Considermakingademandinadvanceofthemediation,especiallywheninsuranceisgoingtobeatthetable–anddothiswellinadvanceofthemediationsoastogivethedefendant’sinsurerorexecutivedecisionmakersanopportunitytoevaluateyourclient’sclaimandreassesswhathasbeenreserved/authorizedforsettlement.
(B) Ifyou’rethedefendantandplaintiffprovidesyouwiththeabove,bepreparedtorespondandtoexplain/substantiatethefactualandbasisforyourresponseonanitem‐by‐itembasis.Cometothemediationpreparedtorespondtoanypre‐mediationdemand.
21
5. Inprivatewithyourclient,takeabroaderview:
(A) Howdoestheclientdefineorunderstandalitigationvictory?
MediationAdvocacyTechniquesthatWork
y
(B) Isthatreliefavailablerealistically?atall?
(C) Hastheclientanchoredonthetopnumberoftherangeyougavehim/her/it?
(D) Howdoestheclientdefineorunderstandalitigationloss?
(E) Whatisthepotentialfinancialimpactofalitigationloss?Cantheclientaffordit?
22
12/15/2016
12
(F) Eventhoughyouthinktheclienthasa“goodcase,”doestheclientunderstandtheriskanduncertaintyassociatedwithhavingajudgeorjurydecidethematter?Thatirrespectiveofyourestimate(e.g.,80/20),ifthematterisdecidedagainstclient,thatconsequenceisborneby100%., q y
(G) Wheredoesthedisputepresently fitintotheclient’slife?Hasanythingchangedthatmightaffect/alterhowtheclientviewsorvaluesasettlement?
(H)Win,loseordraw,cantheclientaffordtotakethematterthroughtrial?throughanappeal?
(I) Whatisthefirm’slevelofcommitmentwithregardtoclient’srepresentation?Onlysolongasfeesarepaidcurrent?Onlythroughtrial?Forhoweverlongittakes?
(J)Whereisthecaseintermsoftheoriginalbudgetestimates?Whatisthecurrentestimaterehowmuchitwillcosttotakethematterthroughtrial?
23
6. Lookforopportunitiestoexpandthepie: Aretheretaxconsequencesofajudgmentthatcanbe
avoided,minimized,structured,delayedbyasettlement?Ifh t t ti l l d th t l i h t b th
MediationAdvocacyTechniquesthatWork
so,whatpotentialvaluedoesthatplanninghavetobothsides?
Istheresomethingthatoneorbothsidesreallywantsorneedsorvaluesthatisnotavailablethroughthelitigation,butcouldbeputonthetabletodiscussion?E.g.,anexistingrelationship?afuturerelationship?anapology?anexplanation?p
Arethereothercircumstancesthatmightmotivateoneorbothpartiestobemoreamenabletosettlement?E.g.,age?health?changeinfamilycircumstance(adeath,abirth,amarriage)?changeinbusinesscircumstance(M&Aopportunity,founderleaving,restructuring)?
24
12/15/2016
13
7. Haveabargainingplan: Isthereanythinginwhatyouwantthatyouthinktheother
sidemaybewillingtogiveorconcedetoyou?Ifnot,what’sl h h ?
MediationAdvocacyTechniquesthatWork
yourplanonhowtomovethem?
Isthereanythingthatyoumaybewillingtogiveorconcedetotheotherside?Ifso,whatareyougoingtoproposethattheytradetogetit?
Prioritizewhatyouwanttoachieve
Prioritizewhatyoumightbewillingtogiveup
Haveanopeningmoveandatentativesetofmovestoachieveyoursettlementgoal(sharedwiththemediator)
25
Haveasettlementgoal(nottobesharedwiththemediator)thatyouhaveworkedoutwiththeclientwouldbeagoodsettlementintermsofrisks,costsanduncontrollables
id d d h i d d iavoidedandotherinterests,needsandcircumstancesaccommodated
Whensettingreservationpointswiththeclient,leaveyourselfroomandspecifyclearqualifierssothatitispossibletomake“in‐game”adjustmentsatthemediationifwarranted.Handoutre“reservationpoints”
26
12/15/2016
14
8. Planforsuccess– takeadraftsettlementagreementtothemediation.
9. Miscellaneous d l l
MediationAdvocacyTechniquesthatWork
Discussandagreeuponclientrole Willvisualaidshelpwithstorytelling?negotiation? Readtheotherside’sbrief&prepareareasonedresponse
aimedatgettingdiscussionsgoing‐ not“winning”theargument. Rethinknotsharingyourbrief!
Prepareyourselfandclienttobepatient– withtheprocessandwiththeotherside seismicshiftstaketime peopleprocessinformationanddecisionmakeat
differentratesofspeed– Youcanonlyworkasfastastheslowestpersonatthetable
27
Becausethereisadisturbingtrendofclientssuingtheirattorneysfor“settlementmalpractice”inbothcontexts– whentheydoandwhentheydonotsettle.It’sagoodideatohaveaseriousdiscussionwiththeclientabouttherisksoflitigationandgivingvaluetothoserisks.
Whydoesanyofthismatter?
CasesWhereClientsSettledwithTheirAdversaryandThenSuedTheirLawyerCasselv.SuperiorCourt,51Cal.4th113,124(2011)Filbinv.Fitzgerald,211Cal.App.4th154(2012)Roldanv.Callahan&Blaine,219Cal.App.4th87(2013)SyersPropertiesIII,Inc.v.Rankin,2014WL1761923(1st Dist.,May5,2014)Amisv.GreenbergTaurigLLP,235Cal.App.4th331(2015)
CasesWhereClientsDidNotSettle/DidNotLiketheResultatTrialandThenSuedTheirLawyerMouav.PittulloHowingtonBarkerAbernathyLLP,228Cal.App.4th107(2014)Playboy,Inc.v.SheppardMullin,LosAngelesSuperiorCourt,CaseNo.BC579105(filedApr.17,2015)
28
12/15/2016
15
Whataredeficientorineffectiveadvocacyytechniquesinthecontextofmediatingthelitigateddispute?
Notsurprisingly,these“techniques” are frequently whattechniques arefrequentlywhatcauseorcontributetoimpasseatmediation.
29
1. Vilifyingand/orinsultingtheotherpartyorcounsel notamessagethatwillbecarried notamessagethatinvitesnegotiation “fightin’words”…notwhatmediationisabout
2. Settinganartificialtimelimitonhowmuchtimewillbecommittedtothemediation(e.g.,3hourmediationsessiontosettleadisputethathasbeeninthecourtsfor2years)
3. Sending“appearancecounsel”oranattorneywhoisnotresponsibleforadvice‐givingtotheclientorfortakingthemattertotrial
4. Plannedorscripted“venting”
5. Comingprepared/willingtodiscussonlythevirtuesoftheclient’scaseandnoneofthenegatives,risks,realityfactors,etc.
30
12/15/2016
16
6. Holdingcardstooclosetothevest– notsharinginformationnecessaryormaterialtopersuadingtheothersidetomoveoffofitsposition
7. Playing games aimed at fooling the mediator and using him or7. Playinggamesaimedatfoolingthemediatorandusinghimorherasaninstrumentofdeceptionormisinformation
8. Notgivingthoughtorconsiderationtothethingsthatdoworktoadvancethemediationprocessandpromotesettlementdialogue
9. Nottakingtimetoprepare/wingingit
10. Limiting/peggingtheclient’ssettlementnumbertothepredicted“judgmentvalue” ofthecase.
31
CLOSINGREMARKS
32
12/15/2016
17
DisputeResolutionAxiom#1:
Adisputebelongsto……thepartieswhocreatedit.
33
Thepartiesmostdirectly
DisputeResolutionAxiom#2:
affectedbyadispute‐ giventherightcircumstances– aretheoneswhoarebestabletoresolveit.
Therefore,thebestresolutionislikelytoflowdirectlyfrom…
…thepartiesthemselves.
34
12/15/2016
18
DisputeResolutionAxiom#3:
Alldisputesend……sometime.
35
DisputeResolutionAxiom#4:
Mediationisnota“onesizefitsall”process!
36
12/15/2016
19
DisputeResolutionAxiom#5:
Thetwomostpowerfulwarriorsarepatience
andtime.
‐ LeoTolstoy
37
38
top related