milwaukee public schools university of wisconsin-milwaukee

Post on 14-Jan-2016

44 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special Education Learners Strengthening Content Knowledge and Collaboration of General and Special Education Teachers. Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Math and Science Partnership Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Alliance for Teaching

Mathematics to Special Education Learners

Strengthening

Content Knowledge and Collaboration of

General and Special Education Teachers Milwaukee Public Schools

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Math and Science Partnership MeetingWisconsin Department of Public InstructionOctober 19, 2010

Vision

• Improve mathematics performance for students in grades 4–9, particularly for students with special needs and for students who struggle, and

• Support a school culture for collaboration of general and special education teachers on improving math learning for all students.

Goals

• To strengthen the mathematics content knowledge of general and special education teachers;

• To enhance mathematics instructional and assessment practices, focusing on appropriate accommodations and modifications for special education students;

• To increase collaboration on math instruction between general and special education teachers.

Project Overview

Project Staff• UWM Mathematics

– Kevin McLeod

• UWM Mathematics Education– DeAnn Huinker

• UWM Special Education– Judy Winn

• MPS Teachers and Specialists– Melissa Hedges, Math Teaching Specialist– Chris Guthrie, Special Education Teacher– Beth Schefelker, Math Teaching Specialist– Mary Spidell, Special Education Supervisor

Project Timeline

Participants

• Year I – 35 participants

Certification General Ed 9

Special Ed 19

Other 7

Teaching experience 1-16+ years 7-928.6%

0-322.9%

Grade Levels Elementary 12

Middle 13

Both 10

Year 1

• Met 19 Tuesdays January through July • Focus

– Numbers and Operations– Barriers to learning mathematics

• Language, visual perception, behavior

– Scaffolded instruction to address barriers

Projects/Assignments

Evaluation• Evaluation 1. Content Knowledge

What is the impact on teachers' math knowledge for teaching? Are there differential effects on general education versus special education teachers?

• Evaluation 2. PracticeWhat is the impact on teachers' perspectives on teaching math? What is the impact of the project on teachers' classroom practice?

• Evaluation 3. CollaborationWhat changes are observed in collaborative practices of general and special education teachers as a result of project participation?

• Student AchievementWhat is the impact on student achievement in math, both overall and for student subgroups, specifically special education students?

Measures• Content Knowledge

– Mathematical Knowledge for Teachers (MKT)• Practice

– Teacher Surveys – Focus Group– Informal probes– Observations

• Collaboration– Surveys– Focus Group

• Student Achievement– WKCE– Benchmarks

Content Knowledge(Numbers and Operations)

Teacher NCOP Year I MKT Scores

N Mean NCOP Score

Standard Deviation

Mean Gain

Pretest 31 -0.12 0.98 0.45

Posttest 31 0.33 0.78

ComparisonGroup 86 0.05 0.76

Practice

Collaboration

Student Achievement Benchmarks Q2 – December, 2009 and Q4 May, 2010

Student Population Growth (Scale Scores)

Math Alliance All MPS

General Education Mean 15.06 12.76

N 359 28,658

SD 26.90 28.77

Special Education Mean 20.51 15.12

N 141 6457

SD 29.43 31.94

All Students Mean 16.60 13.20

N 500 35,115

SD 27.71 29.40

Our Challenges

• Curriculum development– Sparse special education math– Little guidance in linking two fields– Understanding philosophical differences

• Collaborative planning and teaching– Ways to integrate the strands– Challenges consistent with teacher collaboration

literature – e.g., time, instructor content knowledge

Our Challenges

• Range of teacher content knowledge• Linking project participants to student

mathematics achievement results – District data– Roles of participants

• Attrition

top related