moving pictures - web 2.0 expo nyc

Post on 16-Apr-2017

5.370 Views

Category:

Technology

3 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Moving PicturesImplementing Video on Flickr

Cal Henderson

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 2

Hello

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 3

Flickr

• Large scale kitten sharing website

• Started 2003, launched 2004– 5 years old this december

• Almost 3 billion photos

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 4

Enter: Video

• Video was added this year– Launched April 2008

• Many hundreds of thousands of videos uploaded

• Many millions of playbacks

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 5

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 6

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 7

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 8

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 9

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 10

“Video? That’s just like photos!”

-Me, before Flickr Video

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 11

12 4 Steps

• 4 main tasks– Uploading– Transcoding– Storage– Serving & Playback

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 12

1. Upload

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 13

Simple upload

• Web forms– Just like any other file

<form action="/uploadify/" method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data">

<input type="file" name="fred" /> <input type="submit" value="Go!" />

</form>

• But files are large / huge

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 14

Issues

• Two components for uploading:– Sending from the client– Receiving on the server

• Both of these present problems

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 15

Sending from the client

• Multiple options– Simple form– Flash– Desktop app

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 16

Simple Forms

• Pros– Very easy to implement– Works on every browser out of the box

• Cons– Upload progress is harder– ‘Slow’– Select a single file at once

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 17

Flash

• Pros– Upload progress is easy– ‘Fast’– Multi select of files

• Cons– Harder to implement– Flash isn’t quite ubiquitous

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 18

Desktop App

• Pros– Upload progress is easy– ‘Very fast’– Multi select of files– Drag and drop

• Cons– Hard to develop– Hard to deploy (relative to the web)

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 19

Making Progress

• Upload progress– Not impossible with plain forms– Just need to be able to query the upload

progress via AJAX

• Multiple machines– The VIP issue– Enter Perlbal

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 20

Making Progress

Browser

Web 1

Web 2

1. Browser starts upload

2. Web server broadcastsprogress via UDP

3. Browser queries progressvia AJX call

Loadbalancer

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 21

Receiving on the server

• File uploads are slow– Much slower than serving pages

• Apache processes are heavy– Waste of resources

• Use a poll based server (like jetty)

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 22

Receiving on the server

• Or, use a buffering layer– Perlbal is great for this

• Or a lightweight Apache– E.g. w/ mod_proxy

Browser Buffer ServerSlow Fast

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 23

But wait

• It’s not just the first step that’s slow

• Moving files around between servers is slow– Do it out of band

• Asynchronous jobs are in order anyway– Do it!

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 24

2. Transcode

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 25

Transcode?

• Why transcode at all?

• Input comes from many sources– Point & shoots– DV Cams– Mobile devices– Video editing software

• All in different formats

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 26

So many formats

• But very few of these formats can be played back cross platform– Without special software or hardware

• Formats are designed to do one thing well– They don’t always manage even that

• Transcoding puts all videos on an equal footing

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 27

Video file basics

• Most file types are really just containers– MOV, FLV, AVI

• The data inside can be in multiple formats– We call these codecs (encoder + decoder)

• Files contains multiple ‘streams’– Both audio and video

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 28

Interleave

• Audio and video are often interleaved– Hence AVI

• A video file looks like this:– Headers– Video chunk– Audio chunk– Video chunk– Audio chunk– Etc

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 29

Compress

• Raw video files are huge– A bitmap for every frame– Rarely used, even in post production

• At 30 fps, that gets crazy pretty quickly

• We don’t need to store every frame– Static backgrounds don’t change (much)

between frames

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 30

Compresssss

• Intraframe– Treat each frame as a picture– Compress it (just like JPEG)– DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform)

• Interframe– Store the differences between frames– Treat the pixels as a 3D array to be

compressed

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 31

The IPB

• Three frame types: I, P & B

• Intra coded pictures– A full raw frame

• Predicted pictures– Based on a single reference frame

• Bi-predictive pictures– Based on two or more reference frames

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 32

IPBIPBIPBIPB

• Reference frames may be I, P or B

• P & B frames may contain a mix of image data and motion vector displacements

• I frames require the most bits– Then P frames– Then B frames

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 33

Bad terminology

• We should really say picture– (Not frame)– Because of interlacing

• Really, we encode fields not frames– Picture is the general term

• And H.264 contains ‘slices’– Sub-regions of the field– ‘Macroblocks’ & ‘Artifacts’

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 34

I-Frames

• Also called Key Frames

• Allow easy random seeking

• Twice a second for Digital TV & DVDs

• More widely spaced online

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 35

Seekable

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 36

Seekable

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 37

Oh, and audio too

• We can worry less about this– Older problem, well solved

• MP3 is pretty good– Who cares how it works?

• Syncing is the only issue– Presentation Time Stamps (PTS) and Decode

Time Stamps (DTS) in MPEG-2

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 38

Flash! Woah-oh!

The big question:

Flash?

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 39

Non-flash sites• QuickTime• Windows Media• This is gradually disappearing

• Flash player is ubiquitous• Compression is good enough• Interactive too

• But no 3D/VR as with QuickTime :(

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 40

The Flash Player

• Flash Player 6– March 2002

• Video: Sorenson Spark (H.263)• Audio: MP3

– Or ADPCM / Uncompressed– Or Nellymoser Asao

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 41

Second Generation

• Flash Player 7– August 2005

• Video: On2 TrueMotion VP6• Audio: MP3

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 42

The hot shit

• Flash Player 9 (update 3)– December 2007

• Video: H.264 (MPEG-4 Part 10)– w/ container formats from MPEG-4 Part 14

• Audio: AAC (MPEG-4 Part 3)

• Plus 3GPP Timed Text (MPEG-4 Part 17)

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 43

TrueMotion VP6

• Proprietary• Reasonable compression• Created by On2

– Patented– Probably illegal for GPL code

• YouTube uses it for lower quality and old streams

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 44

H.264• Not proprietary• Good compression• MPEG Standard

– Open, but patented– Patent licenses from the MPEG LA– Unclear how this applies to (L)GPL code– But probably badly

• YouTube using it for higher quality streams

• iPhones and AppleTV

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 45

Software

• Open source transcode tools

• FFmepg– libavcodec for VP6– Probably illegal – dubious– Also pretty shoddy– Can only decode H.264

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 46

More software

• MEncoder– libmpcodecs uses libavcodec

• VLC– libvlc uses libavcodec

• So basically the same– Different muxing, same codecs

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 47

Free H.264?

• Unfortunately, not really

• x264 is the only usable one– It’s pretty good– MEncoder can use it– Still limited in options at this point– Again, dubiously legal

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 48

Non-free tools• Flash encoder

– Not automatable

• On2 FlixEngine– Creators of VP6– Windows or Linux– Some support for H.264

• Rhozet Carbon Coder– The new hot shit– Good H.264 support– Windows

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 49

Choices

• Video codec• Resolution• Bitrate (VBR, CBR)• Keyframes• Audio codec

– Channels– Bit depth– Sampling rate

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 50

Doing it at scale

• Not really a problem• Very easily parallelizable

• Amazon EC2 is awesome here– Exactly what it was design for– Grow/shrink as needed– But, per-CPU software licensing

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 51

3.Store

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 52

Easy!

• Really, just like photos– But with bigger files

• Same disk layout as any other serving

• But the serving part is slower

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 53

But..

• Remember the files are huge

• Operations take time– More likely to fail halfway through– Checksums are your friend

• Do it all asynchronously

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 54

4. Serve & Playback

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 55

The choice

Streamingvs

Progressive

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 56

Streaming

• Pros– Easily seekable– Live feeds

• Cons– Special server software– Slower to start– Firewall troubles

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 57

Progressive download

• Pros– Just use a web server– Play offline– Firewall/proxy friendly

• Cons– Harder to seek ahead (but not impossible)

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 58

Streaming tech

• Non flash stuff– We’ll ignore that– You’re using flash, right?

• RTMP– Real-time Messaging Protocol– Proprietary (thanks Adobe!)

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 59

RTMP

• RTMP - Raw TCP socket stuffs• RTMPT – RTMP tunneled over HHTP

– For firewalls, etc

• Flash Media Server– previously Flash Communication Server

• Wowza Pro– $1000/server

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 60

Open source

• It’s not all bad

• Red5– Java implementation of RTMP server– Mostly feature complete– Beta quality, but usable in production– Facebook

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 61

Progressive

• Used by the majority of large sites

• Very simple!

• Seekable with server support

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 62

Seeking

• Serve the FLV starting at a different point

• Just add a simple FLV preamble before seeking into the file

• Simple to do in PHP, Perl, etc• mod_flvx for Apache• mod_secdownload for lighttpd

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 63

5. Other considerations

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 64

Review

• Videos are slow• Expensive to review

• Review grids– Doesn’t cover audio

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 65

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 66

Not enough?

• Social tools are useful here

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 67

Summary

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 68

Summing up

• Flash makes sense– For uploading too

• H.264 is probably your best bet today• Transcoding software still costs money

– Unless you’re willing to take on the risk• Progressive download is basically

awesome

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 69

The end!

Web 2.0 Expo NYC, 17th September 2008 70

Awesome!

These slides are available online:iamcal.com/talks/

top related