olivier schneider: successful and unsuccessful experiences of public bike schemes

Successful and unsuccessful experiences of creating systems of public bicycle share

schemes in different cities of EuropeLviv, 11/10/2014

Comparison of french and polish experiences

about bike sharing systems

How does it work ?

1. 2.

3. 4.

Typical bicycle

Details

Velib' as Eiffel's tour

Only 7 years after the start of the system!

Velib' as Eiffel's tour

Only 7 years after the start of the system!

First steps(La Rochelle 1974)

First steps(Rennes 1998)

All really begun with velov' (Lyon 2005)

Learning from vélov' (Lyon 2005)

1 : 100Stations every 300 meters

Half an hour for free

Scale of Parisversus other cities

Paris : 100 km2 2,2 M inhabitantsVannes : 30 km2 50 000

Warszaw : 517 km2 1,7M Wroclaw : 293 km2 632 000

Lublin : 147 km2 350 000Bialystok : 100 km2 297 000

Scale of Parisversus other cities

Paris : 100 km2 2,2M 21 347/km2

Vannes : 30 km2 50 000 1 600/km2

Warszaw : 517 km2 1,7M 3 485/km2 Wroclaw : 293 km2 632 000 2 161/km2

Lublin : 147 km2 350 000 2 382/km2

Bialystok : 100 km2 297 000 2 970/km2

Scale of Paris

Zoom 1

Scale of Paris

Zoom 2

Scale of Paris

Zoom 3

Scale of Paris

Scale of Paris

Scale of Paris

The exemple of Vannes

Vannes

50 000 inh1634 /km2

The exemple of Cracow

Exemple of Cracow

Exemple of Warsaw

2500 bikes - 198 stations

Exemple of Bialystok

Exemple of Bialystok

What next ?

What next ?

What next ?

Main problems

Issues about vandalism, regulation...

Costs

What about « modal transfer »

« Révélateur de potentiel »

Medium and long term rental

Vélocampus (Nantes)

VLS VLD i parkingi(Lille)

« vélonomie »

Conclusions

Thank you for attention !

Olivier Schneiderrowerolucja@gmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/olivier.velo.schneider