one law firm around the world one law firm around the world status of gats negotiations david...

Post on 30-Dec-2015

213 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

One law firm around the world One law firm around the world One law firm around the world One law firm around the world

Status of GATS Negotiations

David Hartridge

Hanoi, VietnamAugust 5, 2003

Timelines for GATS Negotiations

Started in January 2000, as agreed in Uruguay Round. Incorporated in Doha Round, December 2001.

Negotiating guidelines and procedures agreed in March 2001.

Target for submission of requests 30 June 2002; for offers 31 March 2003.

Deadline for conclusion 1 January 2005.

Status of GATS Negotiations

Progressing smoothly and without controversy in Geneva. But attacked in public by NGOs as threat to public

services, development and the right to regulate.

Key sector in Doha Round, giving leverage to developing countries. But threatened by difficulties in other sectors,

especially agriculture.

The Economic Stakes

In most developing countries servicesaccount for at least 50% of total output: inUS 80%

Developing countries’ exports of servicesare growing much faster than developed 9% against 5% annually

World Bank estimates that servicesliberalization by developing countries willincrease their income by $6 trillion by 2015

Negotiating Objectives

The basic objective is to improve market access by extending Members’ GATS commitments to additional services and removing current limitations on access.

Secondary objective is to complete the GATS framework with disciplines on subsidies, safeguards, government procurement and domestic regulation.

Negotiating Guidelines

Emphasis on flexibility for developing countries

All sectors and modes of supply covered

Existing commitments the starting point

Request/offer the main but not the only method of negotiation

No change in bottom-up scheduling principle or GATS structure

Request and Offer Process

Developing countries have made 15 offers so far.

Developing countries have made 15 offers so far.

The number and quality of offers will be improved in intensive « clusters » of bilateral meetings in Geneva.

The number and quality of offers will be improved in intensive « clusters » of bilateral meetings in Geneva.

About 30 countries (EU = one) have submitted requests. Almost all WTO Members have received them.

About 30 countries (EU = one) have submitted requests. Almost all WTO Members have received them.

30 have made initial offers. Some are being held back for tactical reasons (agriculture). 8 more are promised before Cancun.

30 have made initial offers. Some are being held back for tactical reasons (agriculture). 8 more are promised before Cancun.

Requests by Developed Countries

Most requests confidential, but those of EU leaked. All-inclusive, need to be prioritized. EU also described requests it received from 30 countries.

US requests are public, also very comprehensive. They often request Additional Commitments, e.g. on transparency in financial services.

About 17 developing countries have made requests, stressing mode 4 labor mobility.

Negotiations on GATS Rules

Safeguards: No agreement after 7 years; developing country demandeurs might raise concerns at Cancun

Subsidies: No movement; few demandeurs

Government Procurement: No movement; few demandeurs

Domestic Regulation: More serious: Japan Annex proposal and EC proposal

The Doha Development Agenda

The Doha Agenda has four major components:

Market access: agriculture, services, industrial products

Rule-making: dumping, subsidies, dispute settlement, environment, intellectual property and regional trade agreements

New (Singapore) issues: investment, competition, trade facilitation, transparency in government procurement

Development: special and differential treatment

Dependence on Agriculture

There will be no agreement on services orany other issue in the Doha Round withoutprogress in agriculture. For many

countriesthis is the highest priority in the Round.

The outcome at Cancun will depend first onagreement on modalities for agriculturalliberalization. Without this it will be a failure.

The Big Package

The EU, like Japan, Switzerland and Korea must make politically difficult concessions on agriculture.

They therefore promote a big package, including investment and competition, to secure offsetting benefits.

But agreement at Cancun to start negotiations on these, and on other Singapore issues unless they are delinked, will be very difficult.

Status of Cancun Preparations

Deadlines missed on modalities, dispute settlement and development issues.

First draft Cancun Ministerial text released 18 July, second draft expected by 24 August.

No agreement yet on modalities for agriculture or industrial products, and strong opposition to investment.

Development issues on track.

Deadline: 1 January 2005

Assuming success at Cancun, is completion by this deadline feasible?

On market access and rule-making it may be, but on investment and competition?

What does this imply for the single undertaking?

One law firm around the world One law firm around the world One law firm around the world One law firm around the world

Status of GATS Negotiations

David Hartridge

Hanoi, VietnamAugust 5, 2003

top related