orange county corrections department community corrections update cornita a. riley, chief of...
Post on 18-Dec-2015
243 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Orange County Corrections Department
Community CorrectionsUpdate
Cornita A. Riley, Chief of Corrections Dr. Christensen, President, Corrections Partners,
Inc.
June 10, 2014
Presentation Outline
• Overview• Recommendations• Implementation Progress• Next Steps
Presentation Outline
• Overview• Recommendations• Implementation Progress• Next Steps
Overview
• February – Mayor requested external reviews of Home Confinement and Community Corrections
• August 6 – BCC presentation – Matrix Phase I
• July 31 – National Institute of Corrections (NIC) report issued
• October 1 – Contracted with Dr. Gary Christensen for assessment, training and implementation of evidence-based practices
• December 17 – BCC presentation by Richard Brady (Matrix Phase II) and Dr. Christensen (Correctional Partners, Inc.)
2013
Overview
• Reviewed and integrated the Matrix and NIC recommendations
• Total of 71 recommendations grouped into 8 major categories
2013-14
Presentation Outline
• Overview• Recommendations• Implementation Progress• Next Steps
Recommendations
• Assess Offender Risk to Reoffend• Evaluate Internal Resources• Conduct Needs Assessments on Higher Risk Offenders• Evaluate Community Services, Programs, Interventions• Implement Evidence-Based Case Management Practices• Expand Quality Assurance Processes• Transition from Jail to Community (Reentry Model)• Reconstituted the Criminal Justice Public Safety
Coordinating Council
Recommendations
• Assess Offender Risk to Reoffend• Evaluate Internal Resources• Conduct Needs Assessments on Higher Risk Offenders• Evaluate Community Services, Programs, Interventions• Implement Evidence-Based Case Management Practices• Expand Quality Assurance Processes• Transition from Jail to Community (Reentry Model)• Reconstituted the Criminal Justice Public Safety
Coordinating Council
Assess Offender Risk to Reoffend
• Implemented Proxy risk assessment
• Monthly reports generated to provide overview of risk population in jail
• OCCD Validation of Pretrial Risk Assessment
Very L
owLow
Low-Mod
Mod
Mod-H
igh
High
Very H
igh
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Jail
Recommendations
• Assess Offender Risk to Reoffend• Evaluate Internal Resources• Conduct Needs Assessments on Higher Risk Offenders• Evaluate Community Services, Programs, Interventions• Implement Evidence-Based Case Management Practices• Expand Quality Assurance Processes• Transition from Jail to Community (Reentry Model)• Reconstituted the Criminal Justice Public Safety
Coordinating Council
Evaluate Internal Resources
• Participating on CJPSCC Alternatives to Incarceration Committee– Reviewing feasibility of each CCD program
• Reviewing and revising programs to ensure they are evidence based
• Right-sizing caseloads in CCD– Aligning staffing with levels of supervision
Recommendations
• Assess Offender Risk to Reoffend• Evaluate Internal Resources• Conduct Needs Assessments on Higher Risk Offenders• Evaluate Community Services, Programs, Interventions• Implement Evidence-Based Case Management Practices• Expand Quality Assurance Processes• Transition from Jail to Community (Reentry Model)• Reconstituted the Criminal Justice Public Safety
Coordinating Council
• Implemented by CCD to help determine appropriate programs or interventions
• Implemented Ohio Risk Needs Assessment System (ORAS)
• On-going training for staff and supervisors
Conduct Needs Assessment on Higher Risk Offenders
Recommendations
• Assess Offender Risk to Reoffend• Evaluate Internal Resources• Conduct Needs Assessments on Higher Risk Offenders• Evaluate Community Services, Programs, Interventions• Implement Evidence-Based Case Management Practices• Expand Quality Assurance Processes• Transition from Jail to Community (Reentry Model)• Reconstituted the Criminal Justice Public Safety
Coordinating Council
• Developed database of community providers for referrals
• Reviewing program referrals throughout the community to ensure outcomes are evidence based and relevant
Evaluate Community Services, Programs, Interventions
Recommendations
• Assess Offender Risk to Reoffend• Evaluate Internal Resources• Conduct Needs Assessments on Higher Risk Offenders• Evaluate Community Services, Programs, Interventions• Implement Evidence-Based Case Management Practices• Expand Quality Assurance Processes• Transition from Jail to Community (Reentry Model)• Reconstituted the Criminal Justice Public Safety
Coordinating Council
• Evidence-based case management training for staff and supervisors– Targeted case planning– Structured offender interactions
to develop responsible behavior
Implement Evidence-Based Case Management Practices
Recommendations
• Assess Offender Risk to Reoffend• Evaluate Internal Resources• Conduct Needs Assessments on Higher Risk Offenders• Evaluate Community Services, Programs, Interventions• Implement Evidence-Based Case Management Practices• Expand Quality Assurance Processes• Transition from Jail to Community (Reentry Model)• Reconstituted the Criminal Justice Public Safety
Coordinating Council
• Ongoing evaluations of officer proficiency, accuracy, and consistency of risk and needs assessment tools
• Review of organizational practices, resources, and assignment of offenders by risk to reoffend
Expand Quality Assurance Processes
Recommendations
• Assess Offender Risk to Reoffend• Evaluate Internal Resources• Conduct Needs Assessments on Higher Risk Offenders• Evaluate Community Services, Programs, Interventions• Implement Evidence-Based Case Management Practices• Expand the Quality Assurance Processes• Transition from Jail to Community (Reentry Model)• Reconstituted the Criminal Justice Public Safety
Coordinating Council
• Revised Reentry Model
• Assessing inmate risk/needs – Evaluating internal and
external programs to make appropriate program decisions and post-release referrals
Transition from Jail to Community
Transition from Jail to Community
Recommendations
• Assess Offender Risk to Reoffend• Evaluate Internal Resources• Conduct Needs Assessments on Higher Risk Offenders• Evaluate Community Services, Programs, Interventions• Implement Evidence-Based Case Management Practices• Expand the Quality Assurance Processes• Transition from Jail to Community (Reentry Model)• Reconstituted the Criminal Justice Public Safety
Coordinating Council
• CJPSCC reconstituted by Mayor Jacobs/Judge Perry– First meeting held on March 21, 2014
• Judge Perry elected chairman– Judge Freeman elected co-chair
• Three sub-committees established– Crime Analysis Data– Alternatives to Incarceration– Mental Health/Substance Abuse
Implementation ProgressCriminal Justice Public Safety Coordinating
Council (CJPSCC)
Presentation Outline
• Overview• Recommendations• Implementation Progress• Next Steps
Implementation ProgressSignificant Accomplishments
• Assessing risk of inmates and community offenders
• Supervising community offenders by risk to reoffend
• Evaluating jail transition practices • Using ORAS risk/needs assessment• Addressing consistency issues in CCD
Presentation Outline
• Overview• Recommendations• Implementation Progress• Next Steps
Next Steps
• 18-month process to systematically evaluate current inmate and offender programs
• CJPSCC subcommittee updates in July• CJPSCC and Community Corrections will
collaborate with community partners to implement evidence-based programs and services
Next Steps
• Continue using ORAS to assess criminogenic factors/needs
• Implement evidence-based case management techniques
• Implement the NIC Transition from Jail to the Community Model (Reentry)
Orange County Corrections Department
Community CorrectionsUpdate
Cornita A. Riley, Chief of Corrections Dr. Christensen, President, Corrections Partners,
Inc.
June 10, 2014
top related