overview of fy 2011 cbig funding options

Post on 23-Jan-2016

23 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Overview of FY 2011 CBIG Funding Options. Jim Edward Chesapeake Bay Program July 20, 2010. Summary. Under the strategy developed in response to EO 13508, Clean Water Act funds will be targeted beginning in FY 2011. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Overview of FY 2011 CBIG Overview of FY 2011 CBIG Funding OptionsFunding Options

Jim EdwardChesapeake Bay Program

July 20, 2010

Summary• Under the strategy developed in response to EO

13508, Clean Water Act funds will be targeted beginning in FY 2011.

• 4 conference calls were held with the jurisdictions on 6/16, 6/24, 7/1 and 7/14 to discuss targeting options.

• All jurisdictions were represented at each conference call.

• A total of 5 funding formulas were presented as possible FY 2011 CBIG allocations during this process.

• Options 1-4 are based upon nutrient target loads and Option 5 is based upon the FY 2010 CBIG funding allocation formula.

Summary (continued)

• In addition, EPA solicited ideas for additional ways to calculate funding. No official proposals were provided.

• As part of these discussions, three questions regarding the issue of targeting priority watershed and/or practices were posed to each jurisdiction.

• After much debate, no consensus could be reached on which funding formula should be used to best target Clean Water Act funds.

Three Questions Posedto States

1. Are you in favor of geographic targeting?

2. Are you in favor of targeting funds with priority practices?

3. Could match be a way to consider targeting?

Five Funding OptionsFive Funding OptionsOption 1: 50/50 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to No Action

Option 2: 50/50 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to 2009 Delivered TN and TP Loads

Option 3: 75/25 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to 2009 Delivered TN and TP Loads

Option 4: Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year Period

Option 5: Current FY 2010 Distribution

Option 150/50 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to No ActionNitrogen Reduction = (2010 No Action Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2010 No Action Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)

State Base Funding

Targeted Funding

Total Amount of Additional Funds Needed to

Bring State Totals to FY 10Level

Signatory

Maryland $1,104,667 $1,291,120 $2,395,787

Virginia $1,104,667 $1,456,092 $2,560,759

Pennsylvania $1,104,667 $853,804 $1,958,470 $328,530

D.C. $500,000 $212,984 $712,984 $54,016

Total $3,814,000 $3,814,000 $7,628,000 $382,546

Non-Signatory

New York $250,000 $367,039 $617,039

Delaware $250,000 $201,727 $451,727 $48,273

West Virginia $250,000 $181,234 $431,234 $68,766

Total $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000 $117,039

Total $4,564,000 $4,564,000 $9,128,000 $499,585

Option 2Option 250/50 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to 2009 Delivered TN and TP LoadsNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)

State Base Funding Targeted Funding

Total Amount of Additional Funds Needed to Bring

State Totals to FY10 Level

Signatory

Maryland $1,104,667 $794,910 $1,899,577 $387,423

Virginia $1,104,667 $1,325,855 $2,430,522

Pennsylvania $1,104,667 $1,656,429 $2,761,095

D.C. $500,000 $36,806 $536,806 $230,194

Total $3,814,000 $3,814,000 $7,628,000 $617,617

Non-Signatory

New York $250,000 $395,705 $645,705

Delaware $250,000 $140,808 $390,808 $109,192

West Virginia $250,000 $213,487 $463,487 $36,513

Total $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000 $145,705

Total $4,564,000 $4,564,000 $9,128,000 $763,322

Option 3Option 375/25 Base/Target SplitTarget Based on Portion of Delivered TN and TP Reductions Compared to 2009 Delivered TN and TP LoadsNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)

State Base Funding Targeted Funding

Total Amount of Additional

Funds Needed to Bring State

Totals to FY10 Level

Signatory

Maryland $1,707,000 $397,455 $2,104,455 $182,545

Virginia $1,707,000 $662,928 $2,369,928

Pennsylvania $1,707,000 $828,214 $2,535,214

D.C. $600,000 $18,403 $618,403 $148,597

Total $5,721,000 $1,907,000 $7,628,000 $331,142

Non-Signatory

New York $375,000 $197,853 $572,853

Delaware $375,000 $70,404 $445,404 $54,596

West Virginia $375,000 $106,743 $481,743 $18,257

Total $1,125,000 $375,000 $1,500,000 $72,853

Total $6,846,000 $2,282,000 $9,128,000 $403,995

Option 4Option 4Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year PeriodNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)

FY 2011- 10%

StateBase Funding Targeted Funding Total

Signatory

Maryland $2,055,067 $158,982 $2,214,049

Virginia $2,055,067 $265,171 $2,320,238

Pennsylvania $2,055,067 $331,286 $2,386,352

D.C. $700,000 $7,361 $707,361

Total $6,865,200 $762,800 $7,628,000

Non-Signatory

New York $450,000 $79,141 $529,141

Delaware $450,000 $28,162 $478,162

West Virginia $450,000 $42,697 $492,697

Total $1,350,000 $150,000 $1,500,000

Total$8,215,200 $912,800 $9,128,000

Option 4 (Cont)Option 4 (Cont)Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year PeriodNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)FY 2012- 20%

StateBase Funding Targeted Funding Total

Signatory

Maryland $1,817,467 $317,964 $2,135,431

Virginia $1,817,467 $530,342 $2,347,809

Pennsylvania $1,817,467 $662,571 $2,480,038

D.C. $650,000 $14,722 $664,722

Total $6,102,400 $1,525,600 $7,628,000

Non-Signatory

New York $400,000 $158,282 $558,282

Delaware $400,000 $56,323 $456,323

West Virginia $400,000 $85,395 $485,395

Total $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,500,000

Total$7,302,400 $1,825,600 $9,128,000

Option 4 (Cont)Option 4 (Cont)Option 4Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year PeriodNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)

FY 2013- 30%

StateBase Funding Targeted Funding Total

Signatory

Maryland $1,579,867 $476,946 $2,056,813

Virginia $1,579,867 $795,513 $2,375,380

Pennsylvania $1,579,867 $993,857 $2,573,724

D.C. $600,000 $22,083 $622,083

Total $5,339,600 $2,288,400 $7,628,000

Non-Signatory

New York $350,000 $237,423 $587,423

Delaware $350,000 $84,485 $434,485

West Virginia $350,000 $128,092 $478,092

Total $1,050,000 $450,000 $1,500,000

Total$6,389,600 $2,738,400 $9,128,000

Option 4 (Cont)Option 4 (Cont)Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year PeriodNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)FY 2014- 40%

StateBase Funding Targeted Funding Total

Signatory

Maryland $1,342,267 $635,928 $1,978,195

Virginia $1,342,267 $1,060,684 $2,402,951

Pennsylvania $1,342,267 $1,325,143 $2,667,410

D.C. $550,000 $29,445 $579,445

Total $4,576,800 $3,051,200 $7,628,000

Non-Signatory

New York $300,000 $316,564 $616,564

Delaware $300,000 $112,647 $412,647

West Virginia $300,000 $170,789 $470,789

Total $900,000 $600,000 $1,500,000

Total$5,476,800 $3,651,200 $9,128,000

Option 4 (Cont)Option 4 (Cont)Phase-in of Option 2 Target From 10%- 50% of Total Funds Over 5-Year PeriodNitrogen Reduction = (2009 Delivered Nitrogen Load) – (Delivered Nitrogen Target Load)Phosphorus Reduction = (2009 Delivered Phosphorus Load) – (Delivered Phosphorus Target Load)FY 2015- 50%

StateBase Funding Targeted Funding Total

Signatory

Maryland $1,104,667 $794,910 $1,899,577

Virginia $1,104,667 $1,325,855 $2,430,522

Pennsylvania $1,104,667 $1,656,429 $2,761,095

D.C. $500,000 $36,806 $536,806

Total $3,814,000 $3,814,000 $7,628,000

Non-Signatory

New York $250,000 $395,705 $645,705

Delaware $250,000 $140,808 $390,808

West Virginia $250,000 $213,487 $463,487

Total $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000

Total$4,564,000 $4,564,000 $9,128,000

Option 4 (Cont)Option 4 (Cont)Five Year Summary for Option 4

StateFY 2011

TotalFY 2012

TotalFY 2013

TotalFY 2014

TotalFY 2015

Total

Signatory Maryland

$2,214,049 $2,135,431 $2,056,813 $1,978,195 $1,899,577

Virginia

$2,320,238 $2,347,809 $2,375,380 $2,402,951 $2,430,522

Pennsylvania

$2,386,352 $2,480,038 $2,573,724 $2,667,410 $2,761,095

D.C. $707,361 $664,722 $622,083 $579,445 $536,806

Total

$7,628,000 $7,628,000 $7,628,000 $7,628,000 $7,628,000

Non-Signatory

New York $529,141 $558,282 $587,423 $616,564 $645,705

Delaware $478,162 $456,323 $434,485 $412,647 $390,808

West Virginia $492,697 $485,395 $478,092 $470,789 $463,487

Total $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000

Total $9,128,000 $9,128,000 $9,128,000 $9,128,000 $9,128,000

Option 5Option 5Current FY 2010 DistributionStates are required to document, in their Work Plans, which priority watersheds and/or priority practices are being targeted for implementation with these grant funds.

State Base Funding Targeted Funding Total

Signatory

Maryland N.A. N.A. $2,287,000

Virginia N.A. N.A. $2,287,000

Pennsylvania N.A. N.A. $2,287,000

D.C. N.A. N.A. $767,000

Total N.A. N.A. $7,628,000

Non-Signatory

New York N.A. N.A. $500,000

Delaware N.A. N.A. $500,000

West Virginia N.A. N.A. $500,000

Total N.A. N.A. $1,500,000

Total N.A. N.A. $9,128,000

Summary of Funding Summary of Funding OptionsOptions

Summary Comparison:

StateOption 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5

Signatory

Maryland $2,395,787 $1,899,577 $2,104,455 See AboveSummary Comparison;FY 2015 and on the same distribution as Option 2

$2,287,000

Virginia $2,560,759 $2,430,522 $2,369,928 $2,287,000

Pennsylvania $1,958,470 $2,761,095 $2,535,214 $2,287,000

D.C. $712,984 $536,806 $618,403 $767,000

Total $7,628,000 $7,628,000 $7,628,000 $7,628,000

Non-Signatory

New York $617,039 $645,705 $572,853 $500,000

Delaware $451,727 $390,808 $445,404 $500,000

West Virginia $431,234 $463,487 $481,743 $500,000

Total $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000

Total

$9,128,000 $9,128,000 $9,128,000 $9,128,000

Summary Chart of States’ Option Selections

State First Choice Second Choice

VA Option 5 Option 1

MD Option 5 Option 1

PA Option 2* Option 4

DC Option 5 N/A

WV Option 5 N/A

DE Option 5 N/A

NY Tioga- Option 2*NYSDEC- Option 5

Tioga- Option 3

*Option 2 selected with the condition that EPA allocate additional funding so that no state is penalized by this formula.

Next Steps

•The Management Board will provide feedback regarding which funding option(s) it supports.

• CBPO Acting Director will brief Shawn Garvin, EPA Region 3 Administrator on the Management Board’s initial discussions and feedback.

• The draft FY 2011 Chesapeake Bay Program Grant and Cooperative Agreement Guidance will be shared with the jurisdictions for review and comment in mid- August.

Next Steps (continued)

• Comments from jurisdictions on the guidance will be due at the end of August/ beginning September.

• A funding option will be selected by EPA prior to issuing the final FY 2011 CBIG Grant Guidance.

Conclusion

• While no consensus could be reached, a majority of the jurisdictions prefer Option 5.

• EPA would like the Management Board’s opinion and feedback on the various funding options and approaches.

top related