reassignment committee meeting july 17

Student Reassignment Committee

Meeting Tuesday, July 17, 2012

6:00 p.m.

Scenario Review & Revisions (cont.)

District Reassignment Committee 

Meeting

3

AGENDASTUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING

Media Center, Nash Central High SchoolTuesday, July 17, 2012, 6:00 pm

Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward

Roll Call………………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant

Approval of Minutes from the June 25, 2012 Meeting (suspend until next meeting)

Committee Operating Procedure Scenario Review and Revision………………………………Mike Miller,

OREd Report to School Board - August 2012 Questions?

Next Meeting  Scenario Discussion

TBD

Communications

Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools

5

TIME-LINE

Jan-Aug 2012

Committee Deliberations/

Monthly Reports to the School

Board

Aug - 2012Committee

Recommendations Presented to

the School Board

Aug – Dec 2012

Public Input/ Community Engagement

Board of Education Approval

August 2013Implementatio

n

6

PROCESS IS EVERYTHING

Board of Education

Community Feedback Committee

Committee Chairs

Public Engagement

Technical Support

OREDStaff

7

Contiguous boundaries: Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using satellite

attendance areas.

Respect neighborhoods: Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified

“developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.

Proximity to schools: While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest

school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries.

School Board Priorities

8

Modify feeder systems: In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each site,

consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.

Stay within enrollment capacities: Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four high

schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.

Consider anticipated growth: Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to ensure that

anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.

Enrollment balance: In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and

economic populations at each middle and high school.

School Board Priorities

9

IPSAC – Timeline

February 13 – Understanding the Optimization Process

March 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data 

April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision

May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)

June 12 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)

June 25 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)

July 17 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)

TransparentLines of CommunicationsCommittee Meetings

Open to the publicWebsite

Information posted immediately after each meetingE-mail/ Phone Line

An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has been established to ensure seamless communication and to make all information readily available to the public.

A phone line has been established for those with limited or no internet access to provide feedback to the committee.

COMMUNICATIONS

11

Mike Miller, OREd

Scenario Review & Revision (cont.)

Middle School ScenariosGeneral Committee requests:

Utilization, No feeder – MS 02, Rev. 13 middle schools in Rocky Mount – MS 05, Rev.1

Committee member requests:MS 04, Rev. 2

Elementary School ScenarioMinor adjustments to current zonesRelief for Benvenue (currently at 111%)

IPSAC – Status

12

Committee Member RequestsScenario Revision Tools sent June 27

Planning segment mapPlanning segment data tableDocumentation

IPSAC – Status

13

Middle School Attendance ZonesCurrent/MS 02, Rev. 1/MS 05, Rev. 1 Data

(See data tables in handout.)

Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)

CURRENT 729 633 433 910 1099 0

PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1)

703 653 282 808 847 511

3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1) 488 625 353 888 932 518

100

300

500

700

900

1100

6-8 Student Count

Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)

CURRENT 0.881499395405079

0.944776119402985

0.77737881508079

1.07058823529412

1.29294117647059

0

PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1)

0.937333333333333

0.974626865671642

0.506283662477558

0.950588235294118

0.996470588235294

0.681333333333333

3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1)

0.650666666666667

0.932835820895523

0.633752244165171

1.04470588235294

1.09647058823529

0.690666666666667

10%

50%

90%

130%

Utilization

Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)

CURRENT 0.781893004115226

0.669826224328595

0.877598152424942

0.585714285714285

0.51410373066424

0

PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1)

0.655761024182077

0.47166921898928

0.96 0.570544554455446

0.563164108618654

0.96469104665826

3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1)

0.708418891170431

0.49520766773163

0.980169971671388

0.563758389261745

0.53755364806867

0.91015625

10%

50%

90%

Minority %

Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)

CURRENT 0.728409448818898

0.679363699582754

0.7765 0.581846153846154

0.64117389298893

0

PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1)

0.658779781068899

0.505267094017094

0.87 0.586387096774194

0.685794532892761

0.870818815331011

3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1)

0.661940850277265

0.544407753050969

0.910032175032175

0.5733342154009 0.66889689578714

0.817447869446963

5%

35%

65%

95%

Free/Reduced Lunch %

Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)

CURRENT 0.511127063890883

0.541571319603356

0.551357733175915

0.685584562996595

0.631374453618262

0

PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1)

0.553660270078181

0.71123417721519

0.44 0.680661577608143

0.610831234256927

0.440622972096042

3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1)

0.517730496453901

0.676159479251424

0.421965317919075

0.687109596819989

0.624854819976772

0.486238532110092

5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%

Academic Proficiency %

Middle School Attendance ZonesCurrent/MS 02, Rev. 1/MS 05, Rev. 1 DataMaximum Utilization: 110% (SNMS, MS 05 Rev.1, currently

129%)

Minimum Utilization: 51% (Parker, MS 02 Rev.1, currently 78%)

MS 02, Rev. 1: NCMS to 3 high schools, Edwards and NEW to 2 high schools

MS 05, Rev. 1: All clean feeder to high schools except Edwards split to NCHS and RMHS

Total Grade 6-8 students reassignedMS 02, Rev. 1: 1334MS 05, Rev. 1: 1276

CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOLMIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 02, REV. 1

Scenario Review – Middle Schools

CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOLMIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 05, REV. 1

Scenario Review – Middle Schools

Elementary School Attendance ZonesCurrent/ES 02

(See data tables in handout.)

Bailey Baskerville

Benv-enue

Cedar Grove

Coop-ers

Johnson MB Hub-bard

Middle-sex

Nash-ville

Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek

Spring Hope

Willi-ford

Win-stead/Engle-wood

CUR-RENT

620 341 743 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 583 550 437 1081

Sce-nario ES 02

620 372 688 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 581 550 437 1107

100

300

500

700

900

1100

K-5 Student Count

Bailey Baskerville

Benv-enue

Cedar Grove

Coop-ers

Johnson MB Hub-bard

Middle-sex

Nash-ville

Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek

Spring Hope

Willi-ford

Win-stead/Engle-wood

CURRENT

0.933734939759036

0.798594847775176

1.11227544910

18

0.991031390134529

1.03826955074

875

0.826086956521739

0.9609375

0.813397129186603

1.03958944281

525

0.897106109324759

0.719753086419753

1.01476014760

148

0.752151462994837

0.954104148278906

Sce-nario ES 02

0.933734939759036

0.871194379391101

1.02994011976

048

0.991031390134529

1.03826955074

875

0.826086956521739

0.9609375

0.813397129186603

1.03958944281

525

0.897106109324759

0.717283950617284

1.01476014760

148

0.752151462994837

0.977052074139453

10%

50%

90%

Utilization

Bailey Baskerville

Benv-enue

Cedar Grove

Coop-ers

Johnson MB Hub-bard

Middle-sex

Nash-ville

Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek

Spring Hope

Willi-ford

Win-stead/Engle-wood

CURRENT

0.65483870967

742

0.982404692082112

0.737550471063257

0.520361990950226

0.307692307692308

0.995789473684211

0.780487804878049

0.588235294117647

0.493653032440056

0.989247311827957

0.437392795883362

0.514545454545455

0.965675057208238

0.640148011100833

Sce-nario ES 02

0.65483870967

742

0.967741935483872

0.739705882352941

0.520361990950226

0.307692307692308

0.995789473684211

0.780487804878049

0.588235294117647

0.493653032440056

0.989247311827957

0.432937181663837

0.514545454545455

0.965675057208238

0.643179765130985

10%

50%

90%

Minority %

Bailey Baskerville

Benv-enue

Cedar Grove

Coop-ers

Johnson MB Hub-bard

Middle-sex

Nash-ville

Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek

Spring Hope

Willi-ford

Win-stead/Engle-wood

CURRENT

0.709450714823175

0.936566265060241

0.684589625738674

0.728067729083666

0.467428797468355

0.909124378109453

0.703311320754717

0.702206266318538

0.520635430038511

0.907741433021807

0.456706210746685

0.650129659643437

0.922113163972286

0.593824966681475

Sce-nario ES 02

0.709450714823175

0.921265474552957

0.684186725018235

0.728067729083666

0.467428797468355

0.909124378109453

0.703311320754717

0.702206266318538

0.520635430038511

0.907741433021807

0.457730103806228

0.650129659643437

0.922113163972286

0.595562714776632

5%

35%

65%

95%

Free/Reduced Lunch %

Bailey Baskerville

Benv-enue

Cedar Grove

Coopers Johnson MB Hub-bard

Middle-sex

Nash-ville

Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek

Spring Hope

Willi-ford

Win-stead/Engle-wood

CURRENT

0.618270799347472

0.450657894736842

0.629283489096573

0.731707317073171

0.729636048526863

0.377232142857143

0.575692963752665

0.61307901907

357

0.705801104972376

0.348122866894198

0.721815519765739

0.601973684210527

0.348448687350836

0.606741573033708

Sce-nario ES 02

0.618270799347472

0.453172205438066

0.635578583765112

0.731707317073171

0.729636048526863

0.377232142857143

0.575692963752665

0.61307901907

357

0.705801104972376

0.348122866894198

0.722383720930232

0.601973684210527

0.348448687350836

0.606930693069307

5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%

Academic Proficiency %

Impacting six elementary schools: Benvenue, Baskerville, Red Oak/Swift Creek, and Winstead/Englewood

Total Grade K-5 students reassigned: 71Benvenue utilization: 103% (currently 111%)

Elementary School Attendance ZonesCurrent/ES 02

CURRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCENARIO ES 02

Scenario Review – Elementary Schools

Summary

Middle School ScenariosCommittee requests

Better utilization balance3 middle schools in Rocky MountMember request MS 04, Rev. 2

Elementary School ScenarioScenario ES 02

25

26

Proximity + Utilization

Optimal Scenarios

Review/ Revise

Review/ Revise

Optimal Scenarios

Review/ Revise

Review/ Revise

Impact + Feeder

YOU ARE HERE!!!

Committee Action Items

Further scenarios?Deadline for Committee member requests: July 24, 2012

How many options to present?“Packaging” the recommended scenarios?

27

Reminder: High-resolution review must be performed by NRMPS Transportation Dept.

February 13 (4:00-5:30)

March 26 (6:00)

April 30 (6:00)

May 29 (6:00)

June 12 (6:00)

Tuesday June 25 (4:00–5:30)

Tuesday July 17 (6:00)

August - TBD

MEETING SCHEDULE

QUESTIONS