survival analysis: from square one to square two yin bun cheung, ph.d. paul yip, ph.d. readings
Post on 24-Dec-2015
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Survival Analysis: From Square One to
Square Two
Yin Bun Cheung, Ph.D.
Paul Yip, Ph.D.Readings
Lecture structure
• Basic concepts
• Kaplan-Meier analysis
• Cox regression
• Computer practice
What’s in a name?
• time-to-event data• failure-time data• censored data
(unobserved outcome)
Types of censoring
– loss to follow-up during the study period
– study closure
Examples of survival analysis1. Marital status & mortality
2. Medical treatments & tumor recurrence & mortality in cancer patients
3. Size at birth & developmental milestones in infants
Why survival analysis ?
• Censoring (time of event not observed)
• Unequal follow-up time
What is time?What is the origin of time?
In epidemiology:
•Age (birth as time 0) ?
•Calendar time since a baseline survey ?
What is the origin of time?
In clinical trials:
• Since randomisation ?
• Since treatment begins ?
• Since onset of exposure ?
The choice of origin of time
• Onset of continuous exposure
• Randomisation to treatment
• Strongest effect on the hazard
Types of survival analysis
1. Non-parametric method
Kaplan-Meier analysis
2. Semi-parametric method
Cox regression
3. Parametric method
Square 1 to square 2
This lecture focuses on two commonly used methods
• Kaplan-Meier method
• Cox regression model
KM survival curveDay(t)
Death /Cens.
Atrisk
Pt(d) Pt(surv) S(t)
1 4 0.00 1.00 1.002 1 d 4 0.25 0.75 0.753 1 c 3 0.00 1.00 0.754 1 d 2 0.50 0.50 0.385 1 c 1 0.00 1.00 0.38
5
* d=death, c=censored, surv=survival
KM survival curve
S(t
)
Day
0 1 2 3 4 50.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
No. of expected deathsExpected death in group A at time i, assuming equality in survival:
EAi =no. at risk in group A i death i
total no. at risk i
Total expected death in group A: EA = EAi
Log rank test•A comparison of the number of expected and observed deaths.
•The larger the discrepancy, the less plausible the null hypothesis of equality.
An approximation The log rank test statistic is often approximated by
X2 = (OA-EA)2/EA+ (OB-EB)2/EB,
where OA & EA are the observed & expected number of deaths in group A, etc.
Proportional hazard assumption
S(t
)
Time0 5 10 15 20
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
Log rank test preferred (PH true )
Breslow test preferred (non-PH)
S(t
)
Time0 5 10 15 20
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
Risk, conditional risk, hazard
Pro
port
ion
Month0 1 2 3
0.1.2.3.4.5
Another look of PH
Log rank test preferred (PH true )
Breslow test preferred (non-PH)
Haz
ard
Time0 5 10 15 20
Haz
ard
Time0 5 10 15 20
Cox regression model• Handles 1 exposure variables.
• Covariate effects given as Hazard Ratios.
• Semi-parametric: only assumes proportional hazard.
Cox model in the case of a single variable
1. hi(t) = hB(t) exp(BXi)
2. hj(t) = hB(t) exp(BXj)
3. hi(t)/hj(t) =exp[B(Xi-Xj)]
exp(B) is a Hazard Ratio
Test of proportional hazard assumption
• Scaled Schoenfeld residuals
• Grambsch-Therneau test
• Test for treatmentperiod interaction
• Example: mortality of widows
Computer practice
A clinical trial of
stage I bladder tumor
Thiotepa vs Control
Data from StatLib
Data structure
Two most important variables:
• Time to recurrence (>0)
• Indicator of failure/censoring
(0=censored; 1=recurrence)
(coding depends on software)
KM estimates
S(t
)
Months0 20 40 60
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
Thiotepa
Control
Log rank test Recurrence
Group Observed ExpectedControl 29 24.9Thiotepa 18 22.1
chi2(1) = 1.52Pr>chi2 = 0.22
Cox regression modelsModel I
HRModel II
HRThiotepa
(vs Control)0.70
(P=0.23)0.60
(P=0.11)Number of
tumor1.26
(P<0.01)
Test of PH assumption
Grambsch-Therneau test for PH in model II
• Thiotepa P=0.55• Number of tumor P=0.60
Major References (Examples)
Ex 1. Cheung. Int J Epidemiol 2000;29:93-99.
Ex 2. Sauerbrei et al. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:94-101.
Ex 3. Cheung et al. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:66-74.
Major References (General)
• Allison. Survival Analysis using the SAS® System.
• Collett. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research.
• Fisher, van Belle. Biostatistics: A Methodology for the Health Sciences.
top related