verification at ecmwf...•regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be...

Post on 25-Feb-2021

4 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

© ECMWF October 12, 2015

Verification at ECMWF

Thomas Haiden and Martin JanousekEuropean Centre for Medium-RangeWeather Forecasts

Forecast Analysis

October 29, 2014

2

Anomaly correlation of 500 hPa geopotential

October 29, 2014

3

Anomaly correlation of 500 hPa geopotential

October 29, 2014

4

Anomaly correlation of 500 hPa geopotential

October 29, 2014

5

Anomaly correlation of 500 hPa geopotential

October 29, 2014

6

Improvement relative to ERA-Interim

Upper-air

Surface

October 29, 2014

7

2-m temperature error growth: DJF 2016-17

NH Extratropics, 12 UTC

RMSE

against SYNOP

October 29, 2014

8

2-m temperature error growth: DJF 2016-17

NH Extratropics, 12 UTC

RMSE

against SYNOP

against analysisobs+repres error,unresolved processes

October 29, 2014

9

2-m temperature error growth: DJF 2016-17

MSE

NH Extratropics, 12 UTC(2.8 K)2

against SYNOPagainst analysis

October 29, 2014

10

2-m temperature error growth: DJF 2016-17

MSE

NH Extratropics, 12 UTC

against SYNOP

T850

against analysis

October 29, 2014

11

Regional variations

RMSE

October 29, 2014

12

Regional variations

Stations excluded where ∆z>150m

RMSE

October 29, 2014

13

Regional variations

SDEV

October 29, 2014

14

Europe

SDEV

Problem: strong surface inversions over snow

Problem: low stratus boundaries and persistence

October 29, 2014

T2m forecast skill evolution (ENS) – Day 5

All errors

CRPS

Percentage of large errors

P(CRPS > 5 K)

Horizontal resolution upgrades

CRPS decreased by ~10%Frequency of large errors decreased by ~20%

TIGGE scores (CRPSS) – DJF 2016 and 2017

CMCJMANCEPUKMOECMWF

Z500 T850

T2M PRECIP

Precipitation forecast skill

HRES ENS

Overestimation of frequency of light precipitation still an issue, especially in summer (convection)

10 m wind speed verification

Systematic error (bias) ‘Random’ error (standard deviation)

Systematic error (bias) ‘Random’ error (standard deviation)

10 m wind speed verification

High-impact weather

2m temperature 10m wind speed

24-h precipitation

Tropical cyclones Extreme forecast index (EFI)

Verification on the ECMWF webpage

Model upgrade 11 July 2017 (Cycle 43r3)

https://software.ecmwf.int/wiki/display/USS/IFS+cycle+43r3+scorecard

Verification against analysis

Model upgrade 11 July 2017 (Cycle 43r3)

https://software.ecmwf.int/wiki/display/USS/IFS+cycle+43r3+scorecard

Verification against

observations

Conclusions

• Medium-range NWP further improving – ECMWF leading the way

• Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed

• Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

• Promising developments for future cycles (e.g. ocean coupling, cloud physics)

Random error,

normalized

Random error

10 m wind speed verification

Random error,

normalized

Mean wind speed (observed)

10 m wind speed verification

top related