vinnitsa 2006

, 4-7 , 2006 .

110

3

.

504.05 .. (, )

"", , -

. " . 1939 . " ".

, "" : 1. -

, () . , - , , . - , - .

2. , , , - , .

( ) .

, , - .

3. . - , -, .

4. "" "", , - . " ".

, () - , . , - .

: , , , , - . () - .

, . , - - : 1) , 2) , 3) , 4) .

, - , .

-: 1) - ; 2) , , ; 3) - .

- . - . - , . - . , - - . - - , , - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

111

636.52/.58.053/.087.8:573.6

.., .. (, )

. . , - . - , - , .

, , . - , . . - . - - . , , .

-, . . , . -, 4,5%. -, -. , , , , . - , , . - .

, . -, - - , -.

, - . , .

, 42 , , - - . - , - , .

, - , 50% .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

112

504.064

.., .. (, )

- , - : , , - , - , , . - - , , - ,

, , - , - , . , , - , . - - - , .

: , , , - - ().

-- .

- - , Allium- ( ) ( ).

. . . . , 3-3,6 .

- . . . . - 8,2-11 , . , - . . - , . 2,5-4 , .

- , - . . - . 3,5-5,2 .

- , . . - . - 3,8-5 , .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

113

574(477.9)

.., .., .., .. (, )

. - . . , , - [1]. - . 2003 2004 . - Towards Improved Water Management in Ukrain Wetlands International - , .

(.).

.

- . -

, -.

. - .

- 1,5 2,5 , - -.

- , -, , .

. .

-

- .

.

.

- 1,5 .

.

20 30 /.

.

.

- .

. .

. : ; . : ; ; ; - ` ; .

- . : - 0,5 . 3 ; 25-30 /. : 1 . 3 ; - 10-20 /. : 2 . 3 ; - 5-10 /. - : -; ; ; - ; - , , ..; - .

1. .. // . : . . 2005. 4 (27). . 65-67.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

114

528.94+504+556.5

.., .. (, )

1

, , - . - , - , -, . , - , - .

- , , , , , , -, -, .

, , - , , , .

- , , - . - , .

, , , , , .

, -, , - .

, , - , -, - -- , , - , - .

, . , - , -, . , -, .

- -, , - .

1 (0104U004357)

, 4-7 , 2006 .

115

631.504.6. .. (, )

- , . - , - , - .

, - , , , - -. , , , , , , , -. - . - , .

. , - , , , , . - .

, , , , , - : ; ; ; , , - .

, , , .

-, , , - , , - . -. , , , -, . - , - - , , .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

116

504.064.3

.., .., .. (, )

, , , . , , . , . , , 0,1% . , , - , , . - , , .

, - . ( 11489; 7 01G31/02; .12, 15.12.2005), 0,2-0,5 - . . - . , -. , . , . - . , , , . , , . , - , . , , . , ( - ). 0,1 , , . - .

, , - , -.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

117

59 (477)

.. (, )

,

. - , , . . 45 - , : -, , , , , () , . , . - , , . , , , , , , , - . , - . 1962 ., - , .

. , - , . 1965 . , 200 . . -, 1980 . 30, 2000 . 22, . (1980), 29 -. 3 ( , -) . - . 1929-1940 . 366 - , , 70- . , 1953-1961 . - , - . 1995 . 9 659 , . - -. 2000 . 426 , 2003 . 375.

- , - . , , , , , . (1994) 41 -, , . . , , - (, , , , , , , ). , , -, . - , , - . - , .

- , - , .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

118

759.873:615:551

.., .. (, )

-

- . - (, ) . - - , - [1,2].

Rhodococcus erythropolis -1, - . -5017.

Rhodococcus erythropolis -1, (, ) ( , ) . , , - - . , R. erythropolis -1, , .

R. erythropolis -1 ( 2 %, /N = 49:1, NaNO3, , - 0,14 2 / , 20 , 168 ) 3-4 : 5,0-5,5, 8,0-8,5 /; 50 - 46-50 %, 29,4-29,8 /.

- Rhodococcus - , Pseudomonas sp. PS-27, .

, Pseudomonas sp. PS-27 - . 192 15,8 % , R. erythropolis -1 Pseudomonas sp. PS-27 10,0 % 6,4 % .

, . .

, R. erythropolis -1 . - , (100-250 /), - R. erythropolis -1.

R. erythropolis -1 ( 0,68 /), ( 0,1 / ) 0,01 % 99,5 99,8 %.

- .

1. Bodour AA, Drees KP, Maier RM. Distribution of biosurfactant-producing bacteria in undisturbed and con-

taminated arid Southwestern soils // Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003. Vol. 69. 6 P. 3280-3287. 2. Wei Q.F., Mather R.R., Fotheringham A.F.. Oil removal from used sorbents using a biosurfactant // Biore-

source Technology. 2005. Vol. 96. P. 331-334.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

119

504.062.4

.., . (, )

7000 94 . -

, , . 265 . , 130 -. .

. . - . . , , . - . , - . , - , , .

- - ( ). , 1960- : - 1:1 1:2, , . , . , , , , - .

0...2 :

. :

, , , .

, - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

120

599.323.2 + 477.43

.., ..(, )

(GLIRIDAE, RODENTIA)

( .) 4 - (Gliridae, Rodentia): (Muscardinus avellanarius), (Dryomys nitedula), (Glis glis) (Eliomys quercinus) (, 1999; , 2005). - - . - , , , - (, 2002). , . (, 1994; , 2005). - , (, 2000). , , -, , , .

, , ( ) , . - -- , , - .

, , ( -, , , ), , - , , , - , , .

, , , , .

, , - - , -- - . - . , (- - ) - : , (, 1994; , 2002). , . -. , , , , . - - , - .

- -. , , - , - ( ., 2005).

, 4-7 , 2006 .

121

578.85/86

.., .. (, )

.

, , , . i . - - .

, -, , .

. , , -. , , , , . - . ( ) , ( ) -. , 1999 2005 - . 2000 2004 . , , - , [1, 2].

, , , , .

, - . , , , .

1. N.Senchugova , O. Postoenko The sugar beet viral infection spreading in Ukraine // Repar-

stvi & Sladovnicky Jecmen sbornik z conference, 2004. P.89 90.

2. .., .. // - , 2005. . 44, . 31-32.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

122

595.44 (477.51)

.. (, )

TEGENARIA DOMESTICA (CLERCK) (ARANEAE, AGELENIDAE) .

. - . .. (2000) , , . -, , . Tegenaria domestica (Clerck) ( .., ).

; -, , . - Tegenaria domestica (Clerck) 8,8 10,8 , 7,3 8,5 (.). , 2,010,15 1,630,11 . (t = 3,22; P>0,05). , - , , ( ).

Tegenaria domestica (Clerck) (n=27-34)

(Lt),

(Ls),

Mm t Mm t 9,540,62 2,010,15 7,530,71 1,90 1,630,11* 3,22 6,520,72* 3,03 1,470,23* 2,19

* ;

. (1990) Tegenaria domestica (Clerck) ; . , . 0,4 /2, 0,2 /2.

Tegenaria domestica (Clerck). - , - , . - .

, , - (52,8710,08 2; 36,727,89 2; 43,668,72 2 ). , - 0,840,11 (1,440,18 ), (1,230,18 ), . , , , .

1. .. (Aranei) //

. 2000. . VIII, . 2. . 184-185. 2. . . .: , 1990.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

123

504.064:581.5

.. (, )

- . . - .

. . , - , () , .

, , . - . - . - .

- 7-38, , - , - -. . - , , . - . - ( 7,4) 1,7 . , ( 6,3) 88 52 , (14-) : 83 ( 7,4), - ( 3,8) 35 . , - , -. , : 14- ( 7,4) 1517 , ( 3,8) 1953 ( ).

: , .

, , , . , . 7-38 . . , -, . (Pinus sylvestris L.), . - , - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

124

504.5 (477.46)

.., .., .. (, )

[1,2].: ; ( 30%), -

( 15-20%) , - ;

-;

; -

; ;

(2-3 ), :

; ,

; -

; -

15-25 , ;

. -

, 5-15 , . - , , , 30-50%.

: - , - , , , ; - , , , ; - - , .

1. . /

. . .. . : , 1988. 680. 2. : / .

.., .: , 2000. 389 . 3. .., .., ..

// . . -4. 2003. .27-33.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

125

504.5 (477.46)

.., .. (, )

, -. ( , ) . . . , -, . , -, . , . . , 2 3 - 200 1000 . , 20 30 , . - 3 .

2092,1 . , - 2005. 1456 88 %. - , , . .

. , , , - . . - . , - , , . . . .

, , , . . - . , - . - .

(1970-1990 .) : , , , 2-3% . - ( (, , ) - . , - , . - 90% . , 2 .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

126

581.5 +504.3+574.4 (477.46)

.., .. (, )

.

. - , -. , .

-, , , , - , - .

150 - . , - , : -, , , , , , , - . , [1].

, - . - , [2]. - . , , - . , , - . 8 24 .

, - - , . . ( ) ( - ) . ( ) - . , .

, - . . , , - , , . , - . - . .

: 1. : . , 2005. 2. / .. .. . : , 1969. 109 .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

127

574(074.8) .., .. (, )

?

, , , , , .

-. - - . - .

, - . . . (1992), -, , , 46% - , 24% - , , 18% , , 9% , - , 3% . , - , . 1950 30%. 20%. , XX -, , 10 0,3 . , 2100 3 .

, - , , -, . - . -. , , . , , , , -, .

, , . - , . - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

128

574(075.8)

.., .. (, )

. , - (, -, , , .) , - . , , -, , - . , - , . : , , , , (-), , : . , , -, , , . , , , , (, ).

, - , -. . , , - , , . . .

. - . : : , , . , , - , , . , .

: ; ; - ; ; - . . , .

-, . , , , - . , - - . , - . - . , , -, , , , -, , , - . , . : ,

, 4-7 , 2006 .

129

574(075.8)

.., .., .. (, )

, - . , , -, (Struthio camelus domesticus) - , , .

, , - . , -- , , , , , . , , - . , .

, - ( , , ).

, , , , (; ; - ; ; ; ; ). , - . .

- . - 2005 VIP , 6-9 - 14-17 70-75%.

, 4 25 , - : 36,8 , 36,4 , 36,0 35,6 - 30%. , 36,4 , 36,0 . - - . , , , . , , , -: 40%, 30% 25% 20% , , - 36,4 .

33%. , , - , , . , , 7% ( , , , ). , , , .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

130

504.53

.., .., .., .., .. (, )

-

. - , . - - , .

- . , .

2004 30 - (0-30 ) 15 , , - , , . - , - : 1959 1989 .

1 , , (0-30 ) 1959 2004 . 1959 2004 765,0 / .

1 1959-2004 .

1959 1989 2004

, % 4,14 3,50 3,19 4,0 12,8 10,1

3,9 7,9 6,1 , / 100

14,0 7,2 10,5 5,9 7,0 6,5

( 1), - , .

, -: , , - . - 2004 ( 1) - - , .

-. , - . - 425 / . 450 / .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

131

551.58

.. (, ), .. (, )

. . . , -, , , . - , . , , , , , , - , . - . . - . - , 62- , 35 .

- . 2004 . , 26.12.2004. , . , , .

2001 . , - , . 3 , 1,5 . , - 6,91022* . 10,21016 . , - .

-, , . -, - . , . , , .

: - , , , -, -, F- , . , - , , , , , - .

, - , - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

132

634.1

.. (, )

, .

: Armeniaca vulgaris, Prunus divaricata, Cerasus vulgaris, Malus domestica, , . - , Zeiss, - SunKwang . Excel. - .

, - , -, 8,3 % (Prunus divaricata) 15,1 % (Armeniaca vulgaris)

, - . - .

, Armeniaca vulgaris 1,9 (p < 0,001) . Prunus divaricata - 7,2 (p < 0,001), Malus domestica Cerasus vulgaris 3,2 (p < 0,001).

, , - Prunus divaricata, - 59,4 % (p < 0,001) - . - , -: Prunus divaricata > Malus domestica > Cerasus vulgaris > Armeniaca vulgaris.

- (/), - . - . , / 2,4 ; 4,9 ; 4,6 ; 15,8 .

, - Prunus divaricata. - Armeniaca vulgaris.

, , - . . Armeniaca vulgaris, Cerasus vulgaris, Prunus divaricata, Malus domestica - .

- , .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

133

574:579.87.71:632.951

.., .., .. (, )

STREPTOMYCES AVERMITILIS -2177

, - . - , , .

, . , , . - - . .

, 1997 1999 . Streptomyces avermitilis -2161 . -2177, - 20 . , S. avermitilis -2177, .

- .

- , S. avermitilis 5- : , -, .

, , , 25-100 . - , , , - , . - 1,25, 2 2,5 / - .

, 27% . 17,2%. , - 36%. , - .

21% , 36% . , , , , , .

M. incognito . (2 /). (0,1 /) 3- 50-53% - , , - 2 / 4 , .

, , S. vermitilis -2177, , , - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

134

504.064: 631.46: 681.3

.., .., .., .. (, )

,

- . - -, . , , , , . , - . -, . , .

, -, . , - , -, -. , - .

-, . . .

, , , - .

, - : , , , , , -.

, - ( .) , , , - , , . -, 2, , .

( ..) , , , , , , , , -. - 15-17 15- 1,5-2,0 25- .

, - , , - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

135

631.41: 627.81

.., .., .. (, )

- . , , - , . , , . - , . . - 0,5-1,0 , -.

- .. , ., .

, , -- 7,00-7,50, , ( - ). ( , ) 70-80 8,10 8,50, (7,15 7,90). 7,0 (6,10 6,44). 0,45 1,24 100 .

. 0,12% -- . - , .

() . . - . , . - ( ), , 5 6.

- . , . () ( - ) 0,2-0,3%. - . , ( ) . - - . , - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

136

625.712.4: 581.1(58.02)

.., .., .., .. (, )

-

- , (, , , ) - , , , , - . - , - , - () - . L = ((560 ) + (680 ) / ((750 ) (720 )). , , , L , . L 2,0 , L 2,2, . . , , . , - -, -. , .

, , - , - . - , -. , . -- . . , , , .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

137

504.54+413.2-058

.. (, )

20

, , , , , - , . , .

, . , ; - ; - , . - . . , - , 90 % , . - . - . - , 137Cs - . , - , . - -, - -: , - , , - . , , , , , 15 , - 2-5 , , 137Cs 555 /2 90Sr 11,1 /2 , .

, 137Cs. . 90

Sr, , , . - , 90Sr ( ) - . - - - , , .

, , , , - , , 2-14 , - . , - , . .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

138

581.93:502.72(477.75)

.., .., .., .. (, )

-

-

(), 1363 ( 55% ), 115 ; 43 - [1, 2]. , . - - , - .

- , , 2003-2005 . 3 100 2. - , , , .

1 () , -, ---. 2 - , ---. 3 , ----.

, , - , , - , . - - , -, , , 3, . . - , , . - , - , , - . . - , . - .

, - , - . , - , - .

1. . . (, , , -). .: , 1992. 256 .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

139

: 633.88(477.75):001.893

.., .. (, )

- . - , -.

- . , -, , .

- . - , - . - , , , -, , , . , . - - , , .

- . 2000-2005 .. , . , , . - .

, - ( ) - , , . - (2 ).

- 10-100 (, . , . ).

, - 1,3-18,0 (, . - , , , , . , , , .

, ( ), ( ), - ( ).

, - , - , , . , - - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

140

911.5

.. (, )

- -, . , , - -: , - , .

. 70- . - ( , - , , ), - 2 . , . 76,2% , 65,3% (870 . ).

(41,1%) - , 39% . - (30%), , 2. - - - .

- , - 11.7% 25%, - .

- . , ( 6-8% , ). , , , ( , - ).

. -, , .

, - , - . , - . - , , - , , .

, , , , - . - - . - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

141

575.224.2

.., .., .. (, )

- . , - , , , , - . , - , -. , - . - , 2- , - ( ). , , 267, - .

- : 350 FS, ... () 0,7 /; , 40 % .. () , 20 % ... () 2 /. ( ), 0,8-1,0 .

- . ( 96% : 3:1), - ( 1350 ). 1-1,2 . . , , - 267, -, , , , , . . - . 2- (21,3-27,5 % - ).

, - , 1,8-2,6. , (3,3 0,6 %) - ( ) 350 FS, ... , -, 20 % . .. (1,7 0,5 %). , - , 40 % .. 0,6-1,1 %.

1. , , ( ).

2. , -, , .

3. 267 , 40% .. ( ) 0,6-1,1%.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

142

: 504.054 .., .. (, )

.

- , , - . - - . -, , , - - , . - .

( ) , - - .

, - - . - - - . , , -. - .

, - , , . . - , . , -, 75% . , ( - - ) , , , . - - , , , , . , -, ( , , ) - . , , . , - , . - , -, - . - - , , . - . , , . - . , , , , , , .

, , , , .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

143

502.4+58.006

.., .. (, )

. - . - , , .

. - 30318, 9 (81%), (14%), (5%). , . - , 57,3% , 27,2%, - 8,5%, 7%. , :

1. (9 ) . - , , , 20 , 10 , , , , , , , .

2. (1,8) . - .

3. . 500 , 22 , 170 , 22 . .

4. (44,6 ). 80- 18 , . 90 .

5. . . - 18 . . 550 .

6. . 40 , 19 .

7. . -.

8. . . 9. . . 30-60 .

. . 10. (4,2 ), . . .

, . , -

. - , . - , , , - .

: - , , , , , , , - . - -, : ; , -; , , . , , -, , . - - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

144

58.08

.., .. (, )

(Viscaceae) 11 150 . (Viscum album). , . -, -. - : 15 [1].

.

. : , , , , , , , , , , , .

. , , -

. , , . , .

. , , . - , , , - .

- , 7 . - .

- % - % - % - % - %

1200 25 2,0 37 3,0 82 7,0 125 10,5 181 15,0 815 12 1,5 18 2,2 36 4,4 57 6,9 97 11,9 670 17 2,5 26 3,8 42 6,2 54 8,0 121 18,0 480 8 1,7 11 2,3 13 2,7 18 3,8 40 8,3 240 5 2,0 8 3,3 11 4,6 15 6,3 26 10,8 150 2 1,3 4 2,6 5 3,2 9 6,0 20 13,2

145 3 2,0 4 2,8 4 2,8 6 1,1 12 8,3

, , , . , . , , , .

, . - , . 10-15 [2].

- , , - , , .

1. .. , .. , .. . - . .: . , 1965. 382 . 2. . .: , 1965. 209 .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

145

591.6:599.742

. . (, )

`

, . 15 , 11 - , 6 , 2 , 7 ` . , , -, .

, , . , . , , , . , ` - .

, , - , , , . , . -, . , , . - . , . , , : , , .

, - . - (13 ), , 11 (- , , ). - - . , , -, . . , , , , .

, .

, - -` , - , .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

146

57.08:574 .. (, )

, ( ). , , , . - - .

- . , - , - . 1985-2003 . ( .) -.

. , . 10-100 , - . - ( ): , , , , , . . .

- , , . ( 10-15 ), . - , , -, .

, 1982 . 1985 . 1976-1985 . 1988 . 50 /2. 1988-1991 . , . 1997 . , , - 1,5-2 , 7 80- . 2000-2003 ., , - 1991-1997 . 2003 . . - , : Hydrobia acuta, Cerastoderma glaucum, Bittium reticulatum, Tritia reticulata, Capitella capitata, Polydora ciliata. 2003 . ( -) -.

(BQI) [Wilson, 2003]. O ( ), - 1988 ., . BQI 1994 2000 . 5 , . , - , 2003 ., BQI.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

147

629.114

.. (, )

( )

- , , -. , - . , -, (), - .

- , , . - , . - , - - , , , .

- - .

( ) , -.

1. / . - .. , , 1985. .4. 136 . 2. // . 2.1.7.730-99. ., 1999. 38 . 3. .., .., .. - . , 2003. 185 . 4. .., .., ., .., .. ( ) // .. , 2003. II, 2. .94-101. 5. / . .. , , 1986. .82-95. 6. Wilson J.G., Jeffrey D.W. Europe wide indices for monitoring estuarine pollution // In D.H.S.

Richardson (ed.) Biological indicators of pollution. Dublin, Royal Irish Academy, 1987. P.225-

242.

7. Wilson J.G. Evaluation of estuarine quality status at system level using the Biological Quality

Index and the Pollution Load Index // Biology and Environment: Proceed. of the RIA. Royal Irish

Academy, 2003, V.103B, 2. P.1-9.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

148

577.4 (477):631.615

.. (, )

, . , - -, . -, - - . , - . - , .

( 350-450 100 ) , , .

- ( .) ( .) :

1. , -, .

2. ( - - ).

3. . 4. (75-80%), -

. 5.

, (40-50) - 2,4:1 .

6. - .

7. , , .

8. , , - , , , .

9. - .

10. , - , - , .

, - - - .

, .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

149

631.4

.., .., .. (, )

- ( ) - . - ( ) - .

, . - .

( ) - , , , , . , , , , , , 70-100%, , 3-4 . - ..

, - . - , .

- , , , , . , , , , - . , , , .

- . - , , , , -, . , , , -- ( ), . - . - , . - , .

- ( ) (-, , ). - ( .).

, - . (), .

, - .

.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

150

577.152

.. (, )

. , , -, , , . - .

- - -. , - - .

, : ; - ; - . , - .

, - - - - . -, , , , . - - , , . - - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

151

630.535:551.521

.., .. (, )

, 20 , , - , , . - 137Cs 90Sr - .

90Sr 137Cs 4 , GPS- ( ). , . - , , , - , 90Sr 137Cs. - . 90Sr . - - - ADCAM-300.

, - 90Sr, 137Cs. 1,2 15 /2 137Cs 0,51 4,2 /2 90Sr. 137Cs/90Sr 1,54 (- 9) 25,5 ( 3).

90Sr 137Cs . 137Cs 1,4 4,7 , 3,5 33,5 1- 0,4 2,3 . , 9 - , 6.6.1076-01 137Cs : - , .

- 137Cs 90Sr. , 137

Cs: 1- 2- , 90Sr: - 2- 1- . - 90Sr . - 238Pu 239+240Pu . 238Pu, 239+240Pu 0,24 1,45 / 1- 7,4 18 \ . - .

, - , 90Sr. 416,8 /2 90Sr, 24,6% , 137Cs 3,49%. 19 : 90Sr 65,0%,

137Cs 89,3%,

238Pu 96,95%,

239+240Pu 96,95%.

- .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

152

577.4.: 591.5: 631.4

.., .., .. (, )

, . - 0,3 % . (18,2 %), (81,5 %). , , - 5 % 30 % . , - - . , - , -. - .

- . , , - . , . - , . -, , , - 15-60 %, 20-30 %, .

- . . 1,2 5,6 / - . - . - . - - , , -, , - . - - , , .

- . - . , , , , - , : , , .

- . . , . , . . - .

, , , - .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

153

581.5 (282.274.32)

.. (, )

.

- 2000-2015 " " . [3, 4, 5] - - , -, , [1] - , , , -.

( 278781,0 ) , . . [1] - , . ( ), , -, , , .

, , , .[2] - . , , - . - .

, - . , 100 , 150 . , - , . 300 10 . , , , .[5]

, - , , , , (-), (-) - .

1. .., .. : - // ( 70- - ). - -. . , 2004. .28-29. 2. - / . . ... . 2002. 240 . 3. / ...-. .: . , 1999. 127 . 4. ( ) /. ..-. -: , 2004. 71 . 5. - .., .., .. , - . : , 2004. 144 .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

154

504.064+632.9

.. (, )

- . -, , . - . -, . . , , , , , - . - , , . -, .

. -

, . ( ), ( ) . , , , , .

- .

. - , ( ). ( , ). - . ( 1).

( ) - , ( 2, 3).

() (- 4, 5).

(- 6) , ( 7).

, (7). ( ), .

, .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

155

699.887.3 (477.61)

.., .., .. (, )

- - [1]. , [2,3] .

, () 60

-2-1. 80 -2-1, () - 0,15 -1. , () . 50 /3.

. , 167 /3, 50 /3, . . (1992 .) (2001-2003 .): - 61 62 % [5,6].

, , - , [6]. , :

1. , , 0,01 -.

2. 50 /3, - , , , .

, , -, [4].

- - , , . - - . : - 0,15 -1, 0,23 -1; 12,5 /3 ( , ) 25 /3 , 50 /3. - , : 25 -2-1.

1. . 2. (-97). 3. (-2005). 4. 1, 2, 3 -, . , 2000 . 5. - , (-), , , 1992 . 6. : - , , - - - . , , 2003 .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

156

631.5:633.636.085:504

.., .. (, )

, - .

95 % - [1]. - , - .

- . , -, - . - - . .

, , - , , , - - , . , .

- - . , - , .

- , , -, - , - .

, () 137Cs . 15-38 % 20-45%. - (30;60, 30;60) (N30) . - 24,2-63,2% 15,9-64,4%. -. , (N30) 1 24,6%, (P30) 32,8%, (30) 7,7%. , N30P3030 + 1 (124,5%). , - , 1 , . , - (30) 1 1,6%, - (N3030) 10,9%, (21,6% 34,2%) [2].

1. .., .. . , 2003. 470 . 2. - / . .. :, 2005. 39 .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

157

550.7:553.43(477.8):581.1:581.192.198

.., .., .., .., .., .. (, )

-

7-10 -, , 47-66% (, - , ) 28-43% 4-7% . 16-48%, 49%. . , , - , , 1-3,5 , - , , , 20 , 1-1,5. , , , , , , , - . - , 1 9-10 5 , 1 - 10 . . , . . 50-60 , , -, 1982 .

17 , "" , , , - .

, -, -, -, - , , 6,5. , , . , - . 34 , 28 . (1:20) , , , 113-140%, - . - 105-127%, - , , , Ca, P. - Cs-137, Cs-134. - . Cs-137 , .

- .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

158

591.5

.., .. (, )

1996-2000 - 2000-2015 - . , - . - .. - (1999), .. (2003), .. -, .. , .. (2004), .. (2005).

( , , , ) : . . :

;

- (, ) 500 ;

, , ;

, - , , ;

( , - , );

, ;

, 500 ( - , );

, ;

;

, - .

. 60%

. . - .

, , - .

1. .. . : -, 2003. 33. 2. .. : ( - ). : , 2005. 172. 3. - .., .., .. , - . : , 2004. 144.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

159

551.521 .., .. (, )

, , , -. , - . . - , , - . - ( , , ), , , . , - , ( 80%) -, , , . - 337,7 . (16,1%): 2 - 8 % -, 20 %, 40 %. - . , . - - (1975-2000 .). , (NO), , , , . , , - . - 3,5 . , - -. , -, , 137Cs. , . , , (). , , . , , , . , , . - , , , . , , , , , , , . , . , -. . , - , - -.

1. .., .., .. , - . // .-1996.-1.-.11-13. 2. .. . - 4- . . . - .: , 1991. - 352 . 3. .. : . . . - 3- ., . . - .: . ., 1988, - 424 .

, 4-7 , 2006 .

160

574

Kopetskyy V., Phimister J., Kirchmair G. (Canada, Gormley)

BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT IN ONTARIO

The process of brownfields redevelopment is an important way to improve the environment and

harmonize the human co-existance with the nature in industrialized countries. It is especially important

for urban areas in mega cities like Greater Toronto Area (GTA). The same problem applies to indus-

trialized areas with high density of population as it can be found in Europe. In general, it is a global

problem of XXI century which requires a generic approach.

Brownfields are lands on which industrial or commercial activity took place in the past and that

may need to be cleaned up before they can be redeveloped. To encourage redevelopment, Ontarios

environmental legislation provides general protection from environmental orders for historic contami-

nation to municipalities, creditors and others. On October 1, 2004, this legislation will also provide

property owners with general protection from environmental cleanup orders for historic contamination

after they have appropriately remediated a site. Ontarios new Record of Site Condition Regulation (O.

Reg. 153/04) details requirements related to site assessment and clean up.

The approach known as the Record of Site Condition Process has been introduced in the Prov-

ince Of Ontario since mid of 1990s and includes several steps which combine desktop studies, intru-

sive soil and ground water investigation and remedial activities. The first step, Phase I Environmental

Site Assessment (ESA), is an initial environmental investigation which includes the review of records

pertaining to environmental condition of site, or desktop studies, interview with knowledgeable per-

sonnel, walk in inspection and environmental inventory of the site. The main objective of Phase I ESA

is to assess the potential for contamination in soil and ground water at the site.

The next step in environmental investigation is the Phase II ESA. The objective of this step is to

identify possible contamination, if any, and further delineate it vertically and laterally. This is an itera-

tive process and involves intrusive investigating techniques including soil drilling, ground water moni-

tor installation, soil and ground water sampling. Some elements of desktop studies, like computer

modeling of contaminated plume in ground water, can be included at this stage. The results of the

Phase II ESA should create a detailed picture of contaminated plume in soil and ground water at the

site for the purpose of the following remedial activities.

The purpose of a Phase II ESA is to confirm the presence of and characterize the substances of

concern at a given site. Characterization may range from a simple identification to a full delineation of

the contamination on site. The key technical feature that distinguishes Phase I and II ESAs is the use

of quantitative sampling and analytical techniques in Phase II studies. If contamination is encountered

on site, the Phase III ESA or remedial program is undertaken which includes a broad range of chemi-

cal and physical approaches both in-situ and ex-situ. Finally all stages of ESA lead to the issuing a

Record of Site Condition (RSC) which is a final environmental description of the site.

, 4-7 , 2006 .

161

629

. (, )

2000-2004 - , - , , -.

- - . , , .

. - , - .

, 5-7 , - / - .

, [1].

, - [2].

- . , , . , .

1. S.M. Baschenko, Multiwave laser source for simultaneous sounding ozone and critically related to

ozone chemicals // Semiconductor Physics, Quantum electronics and Optoelectronics, v.3(2), p.244-

246 (2000)

2. Terenetskaya, Solar UV-B dosimetry in situ with D-dosimeter: effect of ozone depletion on the

vitamin D synthetic capacity of sunlight, Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, v.120, pp.45-50 (2003)