vinnitsa 2006
TRANSCRIPT
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
110
3
.
504.05 .. (, )
"", , -
. " . 1939 . " ".
, "" : 1. -
, () . , - , , . - , - .
2. , , , - , .
( ) .
, , - .
3. . - , -, .
4. "" "", , - . " ".
, () - , . , - .
: , , , , - . () - .
, . , - - : 1) , 2) , 3) , 4) .
, - , .
-: 1) - ; 2) , , ; 3) - .
- . - . - , . - . , - - . - - , , - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
111
636.52/.58.053/.087.8:573.6
.., .. (, )
. . , - . - , - , .
, , . - , . . - . - - . , , .
-, . . , . -, 4,5%. -, -. , , , , . - , , . - .
, . -, - - , -.
, - . , .
, 42 , , - - . - , - , .
, - , 50% .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
112
504.064
.., .. (, )
- , - : , , - , - , , . - - , , - ,
, , - , - , . , , - , . - - - , .
: , , , - - ().
-- .
- - , Allium- ( ) ( ).
. . . . , 3-3,6 .
- . . . . - 8,2-11 , . , - . . - , . 2,5-4 , .
- , - . . - . 3,5-5,2 .
- , . . - . - 3,8-5 , .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
113
574(477.9)
.., .., .., .. (, )
. - . . , , - [1]. - . 2003 2004 . - Towards Improved Water Management in Ukrain Wetlands International - , .
(.).
.
- . -
, -.
. - .
- 1,5 2,5 , - -.
- , -, , .
. .
-
- .
.
.
- 1,5 .
.
20 30 /.
.
.
- .
. .
. : ; . : ; ; ; - ` ; .
- . : - 0,5 . 3 ; 25-30 /. : 1 . 3 ; - 10-20 /. : 2 . 3 ; - 5-10 /. - : -; ; ; - ; - , , ..; - .
1. .. // . : . . 2005. 4 (27). . 65-67.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
114
528.94+504+556.5
.., .. (, )
1
, , - . - , - , -, . , - , - .
- , , , , , , -, -, .
, , - , , , .
- , , - . - , .
, , , , , .
, -, , - .
, , - , -, - -- , , - , - .
, . , - , -, . , -, .
- -, , - .
1 (0104U004357)
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
115
631.504.6. .. (, )
- , . - , - , - .
, - , , , - -. , , , , , , , -. - . - , .
. , - , , , , . - .
, , , , , - : ; ; ; , , - .
, , , .
-, , , - , , - . -. , , , -, . - , - - , , .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
116
504.064.3
.., .., .. (, )
, , , . , , . , . , , 0,1% . , , - , , . - , , .
, - . ( 11489; 7 01G31/02; .12, 15.12.2005), 0,2-0,5 - . . - . , -. , . , . - . , , , . , , . , - , . , , . , ( - ). 0,1 , , . - .
, , - , -.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
117
59 (477)
.. (, )
,
. - , , . . 45 - , : -, , , , , () , . , . - , , . , , , , , , , - . , - . 1962 ., - , .
. , - , . 1965 . , 200 . . -, 1980 . 30, 2000 . 22, . (1980), 29 -. 3 ( , -) . - . 1929-1940 . 366 - , , 70- . , 1953-1961 . - , - . 1995 . 9 659 , . - -. 2000 . 426 , 2003 . 375.
- , - . , , , , , . (1994) 41 -, , . . , , - (, , , , , , , ). , , -, . - , , - . - , .
- , - , .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
118
759.873:615:551
.., .. (, )
-
- . - (, ) . - - , - [1,2].
Rhodococcus erythropolis -1, - . -5017.
Rhodococcus erythropolis -1, (, ) ( , ) . , , - - . , R. erythropolis -1, , .
R. erythropolis -1 ( 2 %, /N = 49:1, NaNO3, , - 0,14 2 / , 20 , 168 ) 3-4 : 5,0-5,5, 8,0-8,5 /; 50 - 46-50 %, 29,4-29,8 /.
- Rhodococcus - , Pseudomonas sp. PS-27, .
, Pseudomonas sp. PS-27 - . 192 15,8 % , R. erythropolis -1 Pseudomonas sp. PS-27 10,0 % 6,4 % .
, . .
, R. erythropolis -1 . - , (100-250 /), - R. erythropolis -1.
R. erythropolis -1 ( 0,68 /), ( 0,1 / ) 0,01 % 99,5 99,8 %.
- .
1. Bodour AA, Drees KP, Maier RM. Distribution of biosurfactant-producing bacteria in undisturbed and con-
taminated arid Southwestern soils // Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003. Vol. 69. 6 P. 3280-3287. 2. Wei Q.F., Mather R.R., Fotheringham A.F.. Oil removal from used sorbents using a biosurfactant // Biore-
source Technology. 2005. Vol. 96. P. 331-334.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
119
504.062.4
.., . (, )
7000 94 . -
, , . 265 . , 130 -. .
. . - . . , , . - . , - . , - , , .
- - ( ). , 1960- : - 1:1 1:2, , . , . , , , , - .
0...2 :
. :
, , , .
, - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
120
599.323.2 + 477.43
.., ..(, )
(GLIRIDAE, RODENTIA)
( .) 4 - (Gliridae, Rodentia): (Muscardinus avellanarius), (Dryomys nitedula), (Glis glis) (Eliomys quercinus) (, 1999; , 2005). - - . - , , , - (, 2002). , . (, 1994; , 2005). - , (, 2000). , , -, , , .
, , ( ) , . - -- , , - .
, , ( -, , , ), , - , , , - , , .
, , , , .
, , - - , -- - . - . , (- - ) - : , (, 1994; , 2002). , . -. , , , , . - - , - .
- -. , , - , - ( ., 2005).
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
121
578.85/86
.., .. (, )
.
, , , . i . - - .
, -, , .
. , , -. , , , , . - . ( ) , ( ) -. , 1999 2005 - . 2000 2004 . , , - , [1, 2].
, , , , .
, - . , , , .
1. N.Senchugova , O. Postoenko The sugar beet viral infection spreading in Ukraine // Repar-
stvi & Sladovnicky Jecmen sbornik z conference, 2004. P.89 90.
2. .., .. // - , 2005. . 44, . 31-32.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
122
595.44 (477.51)
.. (, )
TEGENARIA DOMESTICA (CLERCK) (ARANEAE, AGELENIDAE) .
. - . .. (2000) , , . -, , . Tegenaria domestica (Clerck) ( .., ).
; -, , . - Tegenaria domestica (Clerck) 8,8 10,8 , 7,3 8,5 (.). , 2,010,15 1,630,11 . (t = 3,22; P>0,05). , - , , ( ).
Tegenaria domestica (Clerck) (n=27-34)
(Lt),
(Ls),
Mm t Mm t 9,540,62 2,010,15 7,530,71 1,90 1,630,11* 3,22 6,520,72* 3,03 1,470,23* 2,19
* ;
. (1990) Tegenaria domestica (Clerck) ; . , . 0,4 /2, 0,2 /2.
Tegenaria domestica (Clerck). - , - , . - .
, , - (52,8710,08 2; 36,727,89 2; 43,668,72 2 ). , - 0,840,11 (1,440,18 ), (1,230,18 ), . , , , .
1. .. (Aranei) //
. 2000. . VIII, . 2. . 184-185. 2. . . .: , 1990.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
123
504.064:581.5
.. (, )
- . . - .
. . , - , () , .
, , . - . - . - .
- 7-38, , - , - -. . - , , . - . - ( 7,4) 1,7 . , ( 6,3) 88 52 , (14-) : 83 ( 7,4), - ( 3,8) 35 . , - , -. , : 14- ( 7,4) 1517 , ( 3,8) 1953 ( ).
: , .
, , , . , . 7-38 . . , -, . (Pinus sylvestris L.), . - , - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
124
504.5 (477.46)
.., .., .. (, )
[1,2].: ; ( 30%), -
( 15-20%) , - ;
-;
; -
; ;
(2-3 ), :
; ,
; -
; -
15-25 , ;
. -
, 5-15 , . - , , , 30-50%.
: - , - , , , ; - , , , ; - - , .
1. . /
. . .. . : , 1988. 680. 2. : / .
.., .: , 2000. 389 . 3. .., .., ..
// . . -4. 2003. .27-33.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
125
504.5 (477.46)
.., .. (, )
, -. ( , ) . . . , -, . , -, . , . . , 2 3 - 200 1000 . , 20 30 , . - 3 .
2092,1 . , - 2005. 1456 88 %. - , , . .
. , , , - . . - . , - , , . . . .
, , , . . - . , - . - .
(1970-1990 .) : , , , 2-3% . - ( (, , ) - . , - , . - 90% . , 2 .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
126
581.5 +504.3+574.4 (477.46)
.., .. (, )
.
. - , -. , .
-, , , , - , - .
150 - . , - , : -, , , , , , , - . , [1].
, - . - , [2]. - . , , - . , , - . 8 24 .
, - - , . . ( ) ( - ) . ( ) - . , .
, - . . , , - , , . , - . - . .
: 1. : . , 2005. 2. / .. .. . : , 1969. 109 .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
127
574(074.8) .., .. (, )
?
, , , , , .
-. - - . - .
, - . . . (1992), -, , , 46% - , 24% - , , 18% , , 9% , - , 3% . , - , . 1950 30%. 20%. , XX -, , 10 0,3 . , 2100 3 .
, - , , -, . - . -. , , . , , , , -, .
, , . - , . - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
128
574(075.8)
.., .. (, )
. , - (, -, , , .) , - . , , -, , - . , - , . : , , , , (-), , : . , , -, , , . , , , , (, ).
, - , -. . , , - , , . . .
. - . : : , , . , , - , , . , .
: ; ; - ; ; - . . , .
-, . , , , - . , - - . , - . - . , , -, , , , -, , , - . , . : ,
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
129
574(075.8)
.., .., .. (, )
, - . , , -, (Struthio camelus domesticus) - , , .
, , - . , -- , , , , , . , , - . , .
, - ( , , ).
, , , , (; ; - ; ; ; ; ). , - . .
- . - 2005 VIP , 6-9 - 14-17 70-75%.
, 4 25 , - : 36,8 , 36,4 , 36,0 35,6 - 30%. , 36,4 , 36,0 . - - . , , , . , , , -: 40%, 30% 25% 20% , , - 36,4 .
33%. , , - , , . , , 7% ( , , , ). , , , .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
130
504.53
.., .., .., .., .. (, )
-
. - , . - - , .
- . , .
2004 30 - (0-30 ) 15 , , - , , . - , - : 1959 1989 .
1 , , (0-30 ) 1959 2004 . 1959 2004 765,0 / .
1 1959-2004 .
1959 1989 2004
, % 4,14 3,50 3,19 4,0 12,8 10,1
3,9 7,9 6,1 , / 100
14,0 7,2 10,5 5,9 7,0 6,5
( 1), - , .
, -: , , - . - 2004 ( 1) - - , .
-. , - . - 425 / . 450 / .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
131
551.58
.. (, ), .. (, )
. . . , -, , , . - , . , , , , , , - , . - . . - . - , 62- , 35 .
- . 2004 . , 26.12.2004. , . , , .
2001 . , - , . 3 , 1,5 . , - 6,91022* . 10,21016 . , - .
-, , . -, - . , . , , .
: - , , , -, -, F- , . , - , , , , , - .
, - , - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
132
634.1
.. (, )
, .
: Armeniaca vulgaris, Prunus divaricata, Cerasus vulgaris, Malus domestica, , . - , Zeiss, - SunKwang . Excel. - .
, - , -, 8,3 % (Prunus divaricata) 15,1 % (Armeniaca vulgaris)
, - . - .
, Armeniaca vulgaris 1,9 (p < 0,001) . Prunus divaricata - 7,2 (p < 0,001), Malus domestica Cerasus vulgaris 3,2 (p < 0,001).
, , - Prunus divaricata, - 59,4 % (p < 0,001) - . - , -: Prunus divaricata > Malus domestica > Cerasus vulgaris > Armeniaca vulgaris.
- (/), - . - . , / 2,4 ; 4,9 ; 4,6 ; 15,8 .
, - Prunus divaricata. - Armeniaca vulgaris.
, , - . . Armeniaca vulgaris, Cerasus vulgaris, Prunus divaricata, Malus domestica - .
- , .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
133
574:579.87.71:632.951
.., .., .. (, )
STREPTOMYCES AVERMITILIS -2177
, - . - , , .
, . , , . - - . .
, 1997 1999 . Streptomyces avermitilis -2161 . -2177, - 20 . , S. avermitilis -2177, .
- .
- , S. avermitilis 5- : , -, .
, , , 25-100 . - , , , - , . - 1,25, 2 2,5 / - .
, 27% . 17,2%. , - 36%. , - .
21% , 36% . , , , , , .
M. incognito . (2 /). (0,1 /) 3- 50-53% - , , - 2 / 4 , .
, , S. vermitilis -2177, , , - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
134
504.064: 631.46: 681.3
.., .., .., .. (, )
,
- . - -, . , , , , . , - . -, . , .
, -, . , - , -, -. , - .
-, . . .
, , , - .
, - : , , , , , -.
, - ( .) , , , - , , . -, 2, , .
( ..) , , , , , , , , -. - 15-17 15- 1,5-2,0 25- .
, - , , - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
135
631.41: 627.81
.., .., .. (, )
- . , , - , . , , . - , . . - 0,5-1,0 , -.
- .. , ., .
, , -- 7,00-7,50, , ( - ). ( , ) 70-80 8,10 8,50, (7,15 7,90). 7,0 (6,10 6,44). 0,45 1,24 100 .
. 0,12% -- . - , .
() . . - . , . - ( ), , 5 6.
- . , . () ( - ) 0,2-0,3%. - . , ( ) . - - . , - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
136
625.712.4: 581.1(58.02)
.., .., .., .. (, )
-
- , (, , , ) - , , , , - . - , - , - () - . L = ((560 ) + (680 ) / ((750 ) (720 )). , , , L , . L 2,0 , L 2,2, . . , , . , - -, -. , .
, , - , - . - , -. , . -- . . , , , .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
137
504.54+413.2-058
.. (, )
20
, , , , , - , . , .
, . , ; - ; - , . - . . , - , 90 % , . - . - . - , 137Cs - . , - , . - -, - -: , - , , - . , , , , , 15 , - 2-5 , , 137Cs 555 /2 90Sr 11,1 /2 , .
, 137Cs. . 90
Sr, , , . - , 90Sr ( ) - . - - - , , .
, , , , - , , 2-14 , - . , - , . .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
138
581.93:502.72(477.75)
.., .., .., .. (, )
-
-
(), 1363 ( 55% ), 115 ; 43 - [1, 2]. , . - - , - .
- , , 2003-2005 . 3 100 2. - , , , .
1 () , -, ---. 2 - , ---. 3 , ----.
, , - , , - , . - - , -, , , 3, . . - , , . - , - , , - . . - , . - .
, - , - . , - , - .
1. . . (, , , -). .: , 1992. 256 .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
139
: 633.88(477.75):001.893
.., .. (, )
- . - , -.
- . , -, , .
- . - , - . - , , , -, , , . , . - - , , .
- . 2000-2005 .. , . , , . - .
, - ( ) - , , . - (2 ).
- 10-100 (, . , . ).
, - 1,3-18,0 (, . - , , , , . , , , .
, ( ), ( ), - ( ).
, - , - , , . , - - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
140
911.5
.. (, )
- -, . , , - -: , - , .
. 70- . - ( , - , , ), - 2 . , . 76,2% , 65,3% (870 . ).
(41,1%) - , 39% . - (30%), , 2. - - - .
- , - 11.7% 25%, - .
- . , ( 6-8% , ). , , , ( , - ).
. -, , .
, - , - . , - . - , , - , , .
, , , , - . - - . - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
141
575.224.2
.., .., .. (, )
- . , - , , , , - . , - , -. , - . - , 2- , - ( ). , , 267, - .
- : 350 FS, ... () 0,7 /; , 40 % .. () , 20 % ... () 2 /. ( ), 0,8-1,0 .
- . ( 96% : 3:1), - ( 1350 ). 1-1,2 . . , , - 267, -, , , , , . . - . 2- (21,3-27,5 % - ).
, - , 1,8-2,6. , (3,3 0,6 %) - ( ) 350 FS, ... , -, 20 % . .. (1,7 0,5 %). , - , 40 % .. 0,6-1,1 %.
1. , , ( ).
2. , -, , .
3. 267 , 40% .. ( ) 0,6-1,1%.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
142
: 504.054 .., .. (, )
.
- , , - . - - . -, , , - - , . - .
( ) , - - .
, - - . - - - . , , -. - .
, - , , . . - , . , -, 75% . , ( - - ) , , , . - - , , , , . , -, ( , , ) - . , , . , - , . - , -, - . - - , , . - . , , . - . , , , , , , .
, , , , .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
143
502.4+58.006
.., .. (, )
. - . - , , .
. - 30318, 9 (81%), (14%), (5%). , . - , 57,3% , 27,2%, - 8,5%, 7%. , :
1. (9 ) . - , , , 20 , 10 , , , , , , , .
2. (1,8) . - .
3. . 500 , 22 , 170 , 22 . .
4. (44,6 ). 80- 18 , . 90 .
5. . . - 18 . . 550 .
6. . 40 , 19 .
7. . -.
8. . . 9. . . 30-60 .
. . 10. (4,2 ), . . .
, . , -
. - , . - , , , - .
: - , , , , , , , - . - -, : ; , -; , , . , , -, , . - - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
144
58.08
.., .. (, )
(Viscaceae) 11 150 . (Viscum album). , . -, -. - : 15 [1].
.
. : , , , , , , , , , , , .
. , , -
. , , . , .
. , , . - , , , - .
- , 7 . - .
- % - % - % - % - %
1200 25 2,0 37 3,0 82 7,0 125 10,5 181 15,0 815 12 1,5 18 2,2 36 4,4 57 6,9 97 11,9 670 17 2,5 26 3,8 42 6,2 54 8,0 121 18,0 480 8 1,7 11 2,3 13 2,7 18 3,8 40 8,3 240 5 2,0 8 3,3 11 4,6 15 6,3 26 10,8 150 2 1,3 4 2,6 5 3,2 9 6,0 20 13,2
145 3 2,0 4 2,8 4 2,8 6 1,1 12 8,3
, , , . , . , , , .
, . - , . 10-15 [2].
- , , - , , .
1. .. , .. , .. . - . .: . , 1965. 382 . 2. . .: , 1965. 209 .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
145
591.6:599.742
. . (, )
`
, . 15 , 11 - , 6 , 2 , 7 ` . , , -, .
, , . , . , , , . , ` - .
, , - , , , . , . -, . , , . - . , . , , : , , .
, - . - (13 ), , 11 (- , , ). - - . , , -, . . , , , , .
, .
, - -` , - , .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
146
57.08:574 .. (, )
, ( ). , , , . - - .
- . , - , - . 1985-2003 . ( .) -.
. , . 10-100 , - . - ( ): , , , , , . . .
- , , . ( 10-15 ), . - , , -, .
, 1982 . 1985 . 1976-1985 . 1988 . 50 /2. 1988-1991 . , . 1997 . , , - 1,5-2 , 7 80- . 2000-2003 ., , - 1991-1997 . 2003 . . - , : Hydrobia acuta, Cerastoderma glaucum, Bittium reticulatum, Tritia reticulata, Capitella capitata, Polydora ciliata. 2003 . ( -) -.
(BQI) [Wilson, 2003]. O ( ), - 1988 ., . BQI 1994 2000 . 5 , . , - , 2003 ., BQI.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
147
629.114
.. (, )
( )
- , , -. , - . , -, (), - .
- , , . - , . - , - - , , , .
- - .
( ) , -.
1. / . - .. , , 1985. .4. 136 . 2. // . 2.1.7.730-99. ., 1999. 38 . 3. .., .., .. - . , 2003. 185 . 4. .., .., ., .., .. ( ) // .. , 2003. II, 2. .94-101. 5. / . .. , , 1986. .82-95. 6. Wilson J.G., Jeffrey D.W. Europe wide indices for monitoring estuarine pollution // In D.H.S.
Richardson (ed.) Biological indicators of pollution. Dublin, Royal Irish Academy, 1987. P.225-
242.
7. Wilson J.G. Evaluation of estuarine quality status at system level using the Biological Quality
Index and the Pollution Load Index // Biology and Environment: Proceed. of the RIA. Royal Irish
Academy, 2003, V.103B, 2. P.1-9.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
148
577.4 (477):631.615
.. (, )
, . , - -, . -, - - . , - . - , .
( 350-450 100 ) , , .
- ( .) ( .) :
1. , -, .
2. ( - - ).
3. . 4. (75-80%), -
. 5.
, (40-50) - 2,4:1 .
6. - .
7. , , .
8. , , - , , , .
9. - .
10. , - , - , .
, - - - .
, .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
149
631.4
.., .., .. (, )
- ( ) - . - ( ) - .
, . - .
( ) - , , , , . , , , , , , 70-100%, , 3-4 . - ..
, - . - , .
- , , , , . , , , , - . , , , .
- . - , , , , -, . , , , -- ( ), . - . - , . - , .
- ( ) (-, , ). - ( .).
, - . (), .
, - .
.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
150
577.152
.. (, )
. , , -, , , . - .
- - -. , - - .
, : ; - ; - . , - .
, - - - - . -, , , , . - - , , . - - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
151
630.535:551.521
.., .. (, )
, 20 , , - , , . - 137Cs 90Sr - .
90Sr 137Cs 4 , GPS- ( ). , . - , , , - , 90Sr 137Cs. - . 90Sr . - - - ADCAM-300.
, - 90Sr, 137Cs. 1,2 15 /2 137Cs 0,51 4,2 /2 90Sr. 137Cs/90Sr 1,54 (- 9) 25,5 ( 3).
90Sr 137Cs . 137Cs 1,4 4,7 , 3,5 33,5 1- 0,4 2,3 . , 9 - , 6.6.1076-01 137Cs : - , .
- 137Cs 90Sr. , 137
Cs: 1- 2- , 90Sr: - 2- 1- . - 90Sr . - 238Pu 239+240Pu . 238Pu, 239+240Pu 0,24 1,45 / 1- 7,4 18 \ . - .
, - , 90Sr. 416,8 /2 90Sr, 24,6% , 137Cs 3,49%. 19 : 90Sr 65,0%,
137Cs 89,3%,
238Pu 96,95%,
239+240Pu 96,95%.
- .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
152
577.4.: 591.5: 631.4
.., .., .. (, )
, . - 0,3 % . (18,2 %), (81,5 %). , , - 5 % 30 % . , - - . , - , -. - .
- . , , - . , . - , . -, , , - 15-60 %, 20-30 %, .
- . . 1,2 5,6 / - . - . - . - - , , -, , - . - - , , .
- . - . , , , , - , : , , .
- . . , . , . . - .
, , , - .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
153
581.5 (282.274.32)
.. (, )
.
- 2000-2015 " " . [3, 4, 5] - - , -, , [1] - , , , -.
( 278781,0 ) , . . [1] - , . ( ), , -, , , .
, , , .[2] - . , , - . - .
, - . , 100 , 150 . , - , . 300 10 . , , , .[5]
, - , , , , (-), (-) - .
1. .., .. : - // ( 70- - ). - -. . , 2004. .28-29. 2. - / . . ... . 2002. 240 . 3. / ...-. .: . , 1999. 127 . 4. ( ) /. ..-. -: , 2004. 71 . 5. - .., .., .. , - . : , 2004. 144 .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
154
504.064+632.9
.. (, )
- . -, , . - . -, . . , , , , , - . - , , . -, .
. -
, . ( ), ( ) . , , , , .
- .
. - , ( ). ( , ). - . ( 1).
( ) - , ( 2, 3).
() (- 4, 5).
(- 6) , ( 7).
, (7). ( ), .
, .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
155
699.887.3 (477.61)
.., .., .. (, )
- - [1]. , [2,3] .
, () 60
-2-1. 80 -2-1, () - 0,15 -1. , () . 50 /3.
. , 167 /3, 50 /3, . . (1992 .) (2001-2003 .): - 61 62 % [5,6].
, , - , [6]. , :
1. , , 0,01 -.
2. 50 /3, - , , , .
, , -, [4].
- - , , . - - . : - 0,15 -1, 0,23 -1; 12,5 /3 ( , ) 25 /3 , 50 /3. - , : 25 -2-1.
1. . 2. (-97). 3. (-2005). 4. 1, 2, 3 -, . , 2000 . 5. - , (-), , , 1992 . 6. : - , , - - - . , , 2003 .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
156
631.5:633.636.085:504
.., .. (, )
, - .
95 % - [1]. - , - .
- . , -, - . - - . .
, , - , , , - - , . , .
- - . , - , .
- , , -, - , - .
, () 137Cs . 15-38 % 20-45%. - (30;60, 30;60) (N30) . - 24,2-63,2% 15,9-64,4%. -. , (N30) 1 24,6%, (P30) 32,8%, (30) 7,7%. , N30P3030 + 1 (124,5%). , - , 1 , . , - (30) 1 1,6%, - (N3030) 10,9%, (21,6% 34,2%) [2].
1. .., .. . , 2003. 470 . 2. - / . .. :, 2005. 39 .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
157
550.7:553.43(477.8):581.1:581.192.198
.., .., .., .., .., .. (, )
-
7-10 -, , 47-66% (, - , ) 28-43% 4-7% . 16-48%, 49%. . , , - , , 1-3,5 , - , , , 20 , 1-1,5. , , , , , , , - . - , 1 9-10 5 , 1 - 10 . . , . . 50-60 , , -, 1982 .
17 , "" , , , - .
, -, -, -, - , , 6,5. , , . , - . 34 , 28 . (1:20) , , , 113-140%, - . - 105-127%, - , , , Ca, P. - Cs-137, Cs-134. - . Cs-137 , .
- .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
158
591.5
.., .. (, )
1996-2000 - 2000-2015 - . , - . - .. - (1999), .. (2003), .. -, .. , .. (2004), .. (2005).
( , , , ) : . . :
;
- (, ) 500 ;
, , ;
, - , , ;
( , - , );
, ;
, 500 ( - , );
, ;
;
, - .
. 60%
. . - .
, , - .
1. .. . : -, 2003. 33. 2. .. : ( - ). : , 2005. 172. 3. - .., .., .. , - . : , 2004. 144.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
159
551.521 .., .. (, )
, , , -. , - . . - , , - . - ( , , ), , , . , - , ( 80%) -, , , . - 337,7 . (16,1%): 2 - 8 % -, 20 %, 40 %. - . , . - - (1975-2000 .). , (NO), , , , . , , - . - 3,5 . , - -. , -, , 137Cs. , . , , (). , , . , , , . , , . - , , , . , , , , , , , . , . , -. . , - , - -.
1. .., .., .. , - . // .-1996.-1.-.11-13. 2. .. . - 4- . . . - .: , 1991. - 352 . 3. .. : . . . - 3- ., . . - .: . ., 1988, - 424 .
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
160
574
Kopetskyy V., Phimister J., Kirchmair G. (Canada, Gormley)
BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT IN ONTARIO
The process of brownfields redevelopment is an important way to improve the environment and
harmonize the human co-existance with the nature in industrialized countries. It is especially important
for urban areas in mega cities like Greater Toronto Area (GTA). The same problem applies to indus-
trialized areas with high density of population as it can be found in Europe. In general, it is a global
problem of XXI century which requires a generic approach.
Brownfields are lands on which industrial or commercial activity took place in the past and that
may need to be cleaned up before they can be redeveloped. To encourage redevelopment, Ontarios
environmental legislation provides general protection from environmental orders for historic contami-
nation to municipalities, creditors and others. On October 1, 2004, this legislation will also provide
property owners with general protection from environmental cleanup orders for historic contamination
after they have appropriately remediated a site. Ontarios new Record of Site Condition Regulation (O.
Reg. 153/04) details requirements related to site assessment and clean up.
The approach known as the Record of Site Condition Process has been introduced in the Prov-
ince Of Ontario since mid of 1990s and includes several steps which combine desktop studies, intru-
sive soil and ground water investigation and remedial activities. The first step, Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment (ESA), is an initial environmental investigation which includes the review of records
pertaining to environmental condition of site, or desktop studies, interview with knowledgeable per-
sonnel, walk in inspection and environmental inventory of the site. The main objective of Phase I ESA
is to assess the potential for contamination in soil and ground water at the site.
The next step in environmental investigation is the Phase II ESA. The objective of this step is to
identify possible contamination, if any, and further delineate it vertically and laterally. This is an itera-
tive process and involves intrusive investigating techniques including soil drilling, ground water moni-
tor installation, soil and ground water sampling. Some elements of desktop studies, like computer
modeling of contaminated plume in ground water, can be included at this stage. The results of the
Phase II ESA should create a detailed picture of contaminated plume in soil and ground water at the
site for the purpose of the following remedial activities.
The purpose of a Phase II ESA is to confirm the presence of and characterize the substances of
concern at a given site. Characterization may range from a simple identification to a full delineation of
the contamination on site. The key technical feature that distinguishes Phase I and II ESAs is the use
of quantitative sampling and analytical techniques in Phase II studies. If contamination is encountered
on site, the Phase III ESA or remedial program is undertaken which includes a broad range of chemi-
cal and physical approaches both in-situ and ex-situ. Finally all stages of ESA lead to the issuing a
Record of Site Condition (RSC) which is a final environmental description of the site.
-
, 4-7 , 2006 .
161
629
. (, )
2000-2004 - , - , , -.
- - . , , .
. - , - .
, 5-7 , - / - .
, [1].
, - [2].
- . , , . , .
1. S.M. Baschenko, Multiwave laser source for simultaneous sounding ozone and critically related to
ozone chemicals // Semiconductor Physics, Quantum electronics and Optoelectronics, v.3(2), p.244-
246 (2000)
2. Terenetskaya, Solar UV-B dosimetry in situ with D-dosimeter: effect of ozone depletion on the
vitamin D synthetic capacity of sunlight, Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, v.120, pp.45-50 (2003)