an online evaluation of explicit feedback mechanisms for recommender systems

1
An Online Evaluation of Explicit Feedback Mechanisms for Recommender Systems Simon Dooms [email protected] Toon De Pessemier [email protected] Luc Martens [email protected] WiCa, Wireless & Cable, www.wica.intec.ugent.be Gaston Crommenlaan 8 box 201, 9050 Ghent, Belgium Ghent University, Department of Information Technology Introduction 1 Recommender algorithms need feedback data Feedback systems collect this input from the user Can be explicit (ratings) or implicit (logs in the background) Ratings can be dynamic (JavaScript) or static (HTML forms) The Experiment 2 On the pages of a popular Belgian cultural website we randomly put one of the four most used rating mechanisms (dynamic thumbs, dynamic stars, static thumbs and static stars) and logged the interaction of the users. Next to this explicit feedback, we tracked also implicit feedback in the form of click and browse behavior. The Results 3 6 months of data 8 100 explicit ratings 200 000 implicit ratings 800 000 pageviews 5-Star (dynamic) Thumbs (static) Thumbs (dynamic) 5-Star (static) 1330 1694 2101 2976 16 % 21 % 26 % 37% Conclusion 4 Users don’t prefer dynamic over static systems Most (explicit) ratings are provided anonymously The 5-stars systems are used as thumbs systems (The extreme star values i.e. 1 and 5 are most commonly used) Explicit feedback is hard to get, implicit feedback is easy The static 5-stars rating system collected the most feedback Future Work 5 Optimize feedback collection How can users be encouraged to rate? How to combine explicit and implicit feedback? What feedback system collects most valuable feedback? Quantify the relevancy of explicit versus implicit feedback Extract events dataset for future research Rating Values Distribution for Thumbs and Stars Explicit Ratings per day Implicit Ratings per day Cumulative number of Explicit Ratings Explicit Feedback Anonymous Vs User

Upload: simon-dooms

Post on 02-Jul-2015

58 views

Category:

Science


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Poster about an online feedback experiment as presented during the WEBIST 2011 conference in Noordwijkerhout (The Netherlands), May 7, 2011 by Simon Dooms.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An online evaluation of explicit feedback mechanisms for recommender systems

An Online Evaluation of Explicit Feedback Mechanisms for Recommender Systems

Simon Dooms [email protected]

Toon De Pessemier [email protected]

Luc [email protected]

WiCa, Wireless & Cable, www.wica.intec.ugent.beGaston Crommenlaan 8 box 201, 9050 Ghent, BelgiumGhent University, Department of Information Technology

Introduction1

Recommender algorithms need feedback data

Feedback systems collect this input from the user

Can be explicit (ratings) or implicit (logs in the background)

Ratings can be dynamic (JavaScript) or static (HTML forms)

The Experiment2

On the pages of a popular Belgian cultural website we

randomly put one of the four most used rating mechanisms

(dynamic thumbs, dynamic stars, static thumbs and

static stars) and logged the interaction of the users. Next to

this explicit feedback, we tracked also implicit feedback in

the form of click and browse behavior.

The Results3

6 months of data

8 100 explicit ratings

200 000 implicit ratings

800 000 pageviews

5-Star

(dynamic)

Thumbs

(static)

Thumbs

(dynamic)

5-Star

(static)

1330 1694 2101 2976

16 % 21 % 26 % 37%

Conclusion4

Users don’t prefer dynamic over static systems

Most (explicit) ratings are provided anonymously

The 5-stars systems are used as thumbs systems(The extreme star values i.e. 1 and 5 are most commonly used)

Explicit feedback is hard to get, implicit feedback is easy

The static 5-stars rating system collected the most feedback

Future Work5

Optimize feedback collectionHow can users be encouraged to rate?How to combine explicit and implicit feedback?

What feedback system collects most valuable feedback?Quantify the relevancy of explicit versus implicit feedback

Extract events dataset for future research

Rating Values Distribution for Thumbs and Stars

Explicit Ratings per day

Implicit Ratings per day

Cumulative number of Explicit RatingsExplicit Feedback Anonymous Vs User