analysis of knuckleball trajectories
DESCRIPTION
Analysis of Knuckleball Trajectories. Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Recently retired knuckleball pitcher Tim Wakefield. Issues to be Addressed. The “movement” of knuckleball pitches The “smoothness” of knuckleball trajectories. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Analysis of Knuckleball TrajectoriesAlan M. Nathan
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Recently retired knuckleball pitcher Tim Wakefield
Issues to be Addressed
• The “movement” of knuckleball pitches• The “smoothness” of knuckleball trajectories
Knuckleball thrown with very little spin no Magnus force
• But still lots of erratic “movement”• Origin of movement revealed in wind
tunnel experiments
Wind Tunnel Data, 4S OrientationMike Morrissey (MS Thesis) and John Borg (Marquette)
Agrees with Watts & Sawyer, AJP (1975)
Studying Knuckleball Trajectories Using the PITCHf/x Tracking System
Two video cameras @60 fps• approximately orthogonal axes
– full 3D reconstruction• tracks every pitch in every MLB ballpark
– all data publicly available
Image, courtesy of Sportvision
Studies of Knuckleball Movement
• Movement = deviation of trajectory from straight line, with gravity removed
• Easily measured with PITCHf/x
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 10 20 30 40 50distance from home plate (ft)
View from above
5” movement
Direction of movement vs. release speed(Jon Lester)
707580859095
100
0
30
6090
120
210
240270
300
330
“Normal” pitches have predictable movement
Catcher’s View
55
60
65
70
75
0
30
6090
120
210
240270
300
330
Direction of movement vs. release speed(Tim Wakefield)
707580859095
100
0
30
6090
120
210
240270
300
330
Knuckleballs do not have predictable movement
But is the trajectory “smooth”?
9 Free Parameters:x0, y0, z0, vx0, vy0, vz0, CD, CL,
• Fit to smooth function• Examine RMS deviation of data from fit
Normal(201)
Knuckleball (77)
• Normal and knuckleball pitches follow similar distributions• Knuckleballs only slightly (few tenths of inch) less smooth
278 pitches from August 29, 2011
Two Examples:Which one is the knuckleball?
-1.6
-1.5
-1.4
-1.3
-1.2
-1.1
-1.0
-0.9
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
6.2
6.4
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
t (sec)
z
x
-0.90
-0.80
-0.70
-0.60
-0.50
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
t (sec)
zx
76 mph knuckleballrms=0.374”
75 mph curveballrms=0.373”
2011Aug29-161108
Summary of Conclusions• Movement of knuckleball trajectories varies
considerably from pitch to pitch– Magnitude and direction quasi-random
• Any given trajectory is as smooth as those of ordinary pitches– within limits of precision of tracking data (~0.3”-0.5”)
• Open questions/work in progress– Are erratic movement and smoothness conclusions
consistent with wind tunnel data?– How can perception and reality be reconciled?