analysis of plasma facing materials ... - max planck society

38
ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS IN CONTROLLED FUSION DEVICES Marek Rubel Alfvén Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology, Association EURATOM – VR, Stockholm, Sweden

Upload: others

Post on 02-May-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS

IN CONTROLLED FUSION DEVICES

Marek Rubel

Alfvén Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology, Association EURATOM – VR, Stockholm, Sweden

Page 2: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Paul Coad and Guy Matthews

Jari Likonen

Volker Philipps and Peter Wienhold

Tetsuo Tanabe

Nikolas Bekris and Ralf-Dieter Penzhorn

Acknowledgements

Page 3: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

• What is to be analysed?

• Why is it to be analysed?

• How is the analysis carried out?

STRUCTURE OF THE TALK

Page 4: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

2003

Poloidallimiters

Toroidalbeltpump limiter

1999-2001 2002 - 03. 2004

What is to be analysed ?

A large number of:• limiter plates• divertor plates• other wall components• optical components• instrumented tiles• long-term probes• short-term probes

[At least tilesfrom onepoloidal cross section.]

Page 5: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Layers of Re-deposited Material

Tiles of a toroidal limiter

Flaking re-deposited

layer

Deposition zone

Erosion zone

Cross-section of a re-deposited layer

~ 43 μm

Page 6: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

EROSION BY MELTING

Beryllium antenna screenat JET

Tm(Be) = 1278 oC

Limiter from FTUTZM coated with 2 mm VPS

TungstenTm(W) = 3683 oC

Page 7: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Atoms to be Analysed in Re-deposited Layers

FUEL

Z = 1 (H D T )

PLASMA IMPURITY ATOMS: Eroded species

Z > 2

For instance: Li Be 10B 11B 12C 13C 14C Si Ni Cr Fe Mo W Re

Page 8: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

We are to answer some basic questions !

What has happened ?

Why has it happened ?

How to deal with the problem ?

We are paid NOT only to find and emphasize problems but TO FIND AND PROVIDE SOLUTIONS.

Page 9: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

How ??

ANALYSIS

Methods, selected Results & Instrumentation

Page 10: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

ION BEAMS for Material Characterisation

BULKSURFACE

Page 11: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Methods Based on Ion – Surface Interactions

MODIFIED SURFACE andSUB-SURFACE REGION

Page 12: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Collisions & Scattering

Detector

RBS & (EPS)

Target atom

Projectile

Detector

ERDA & (HI-ERDA)

Target atom

Projectile

Page 13: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Kinematic Factor

kp is unique for a given Mp - Mr combination:

• unambiguous determination of a given mass in the spectrum

• for a given Mp mass separation decreases for increasing Mr.

• better separation of larger Mr with heavier Mp

• only target atoms heavier than projectiles can be determined

• for Mp ≥ Mr only forward scattering possible

• kp increases with Θ .

• better detection at large scattering angles.

Page 14: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Efficiency in RBS: Differential Cross-section

σp cross-sectionΩ solid angle in detection systemZp, Zr atomic numbers

∝ (Θ, Mp, Mr)

Important: For a given projectile σp scales with (Zr / E0)2

higher sensitivity for heavy elements and at lower E0.

Page 15: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Good separation of low masses, poorer for medium and high.No detection of deuterium with a 4He+ beam.Very difficult (not possible) to detect co-deposited boron on the graphite target.High sensitivity for heavy elements.

Num

ber o

f cou

nts

DEPOSIT

O

Si

Ne

Inco

nel (

Ni +

Cr +

Fe)

Mo

Channel number 0

250

100 400

C (substrate)

Bac

ksca

tter

ing

yiel

d(c

ount

s)

Rutherford Backscattering Spectrum (4He+ beam):Elements Co-deposited on Graphite PFC

NO = 1017 cm-2

NSi = 1015 cm-2

NMo = 1014 cm-2

Page 16: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Quantification

Nt concentration of speciesA number of counts in multi-channel analyserQ ion dose measured by current integratorσp cross-sectionΩ solid angle in detection systemZp, Zr atomic numbers

Nt = A/σ Ω Q

All parameters in the system are directly measured (Q, A) and independently calculated (Ω, σ) knowing the scattering geometry, detector active area, atomic masses and numbers.

• There is no free parameter left. • RBS is an absolute quantitative method.• No standards for calibration are required.*

Page 17: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Carbon transport studies by tracer techniques

NUCLEAR RESONANCE & ENHANCED PROTON BACKSCATTERING:

C-13 Resonance and C-12 enhanced scattering

DAl

3 %

97 %

• Very good separation of small masses (but hopeless for high).• High sensitivity for low-Z (not attainable with a 4He beam).

12C(p,p)12C

13C(p,p)13C

d(p,p)d

Al substrate

Gas inlet hole

Page 18: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

3He(d,p)4He

Q = 18.3636 MeV Detected particle: proton 11 – 14 MeV rangeProton spectrum can be converted into a deuterium depth profile.

Information depth in C matrixCross- section versus energy

3He ENERGY [MeV]3He ENERGY [MeV]

CR

OSS

SE

CT

I ON

dσ/

dQ[ m

barn

/ sr]

Eth

Page 19: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Nuclear Reaction Analysisdepth profile of deuterium in a flake from the ALT II tile

Layer Structure and D concentration:

9 x 1017 D at μm-1 = 9 x 1021 D at / g C

D/C = 0.1

3He beam 1.8 MeV

PRO

TON

YIE

LD (c

ount

s)

Page 20: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Deuterium Depth Profiles in Plasma Facing Components

Deposition zone Erosion zone

Page 21: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

MATERIAL MIGRATION STUDIES: TRACER TECHNIQUES

Probe

1.4x1017 Hf

4.29x1023 13C at

4.5x1021 B

How is carbon transported andwhere is it re-deposited?

How to answer these questions?• Controlled injection of 13C tracer.

• Analysis of tiles to quantify the amount of13C tracer re-deposited in different locations.

Page 22: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Why accelerator-based IBA techniques ?Summary

• Efficiency:– Combination of various techniques in one system.– Analysis of many elements and isotopes in the same system.– Relatively quick analysis over large areas.

• Sensitivity & Selectivity & Quantification (no standards).

• Neither special sampling nor sample preparation needed.

• Depth profiling (limited in some cases).

• Chemical state of atoms is of secondary importance.

Page 23: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Depth (μm)0 10 20 30 40 50

100

101

102

103

104

105

12C

13C

Inte

nsity

(cps

)

SIMS Analysis of Tracer Experiment: Depth Distribution of Re-deposited 13C

Message: vast amount of C-13 is found in a thin surface layer (< 2 μm).

Question: Why are the carbon profiles hollow?

Page 24: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Depth (μm)0 10 20 30 40 50

100

101

102

103

104

105

2H

9Be

12C

13C

Inte

nsity

(cps

)

SIMS: Depth Distribution of Species

9Be

Page 25: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry: Advantages and Limitations

• Ultra-high sensitivity. Unbeatable in qualitative analysis.

• Depth profiling.

• Poor quantification because of matrix and crater effects.

Page 26: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

TRITIUM ANALYSIS

• LIQUID SCINTILLOGRAPHY (LSC) OF TRITIATED WATER

• IMAGING PLATE (IP)

• BETA-INDUCED X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY (BIXS)

Page 27: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

JET Divertor: Tritium retention after D-T Operation

How was the analysis performed?

JG98.115/4c

1

2

3

4

5 6

7

8

9

101.7

0.7

1.1

10.8

T Content in TBq

Inner wall7.6

Outer poloidallimiter 18.7

7.3198.0 0.8

0.2

0.4

0.4

0.95.1

R-D Penzhorn, N Bekris, FZK, Karlsruhe

Coring

Full combustion

Liquid scintillography of Q2OQ2 = DT, HT, T2

Page 28: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Sampling and Analysis

D, Be and C: NRA with a 3He+ beam

Example of a divertor tile

TRITIUM: • Full combustion • LSC of Q2O

The aims of sampling:

•Reduction of total radioactivity to be handled in further studies

•Comparative analysis of D and T

Page 29: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Exfoliated area 200

400

600

1200

1400

800

1000

PSL intensity[PSL/mm2]

0

Back

side

of e

xfol

iated

laye

r

Shadowed area

Imaging Plate Technique for Tritium Analysis

Tritium on the divertorplate from JET

Courtesy: Tetsuo Tanabe, Kyushu University, Japan

Page 30: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

INSTRUMENTATION

Page 31: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

INSTRUMENTATION FOR ANALYSIS OF PFM

• Accelerator

• Analysis chamber with detectors

• Targets

Page 32: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Instrumentation: Analysis chamber

Page 33: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Analysis chamber

Vertical manipulator:Vertical travel Z= 250 mmLimitations: sample size: < 145 x 250 mmsample weight: 1 kg

2.5 MeV Beam:1H+, 3He+, 4He+

d = 330 mm

h = 450 mm

NRA

RBS

ERDA

PIXE

Horizontal manipulator for semi-spherical samples:

Weight limit: 20 kg

Page 34: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Instrumentation: Limiter manipulator

Weight: 23 kg

Capabilities:Probes up to 20 kgRotation X and Y: 180o

Positioning: ± 50 μm

Page 35: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

MATERIAL TRANSPORT STUDIES: TRACER TECHNIQUES and COLLECTOR PROBES

Probe

1.4x1017 Hf

4.29x1023 13C at

4.5x1021 B Collector probe before and after exposure

BN

Si targets

Page 36: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Concluding Remarks:Overview of Material Migration in JET

LimitedPhysical Erosion

and Deposition

DepositionChemical Erosion

Net Erosion:physical

&chemical

Mach Probe

Tile analysis

QMB

This picture is based on:

• Tile analysis

• Tracer injection experiments

• Probe measurements

• Quartz micro-balance data

Page 37: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Simple concluding remarks and recommendations

Use a relevant set of methods for solving a given problem.

NEVER EVER claim that ”MY METHOD” solves all problems(possible and impossible).

Cross-check your results !

There is NO single method that can answer all questions but there are methods that can provide answers to specific questions.

CO-OPERATE !!

Page 38: ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS ... - Max Planck Society

Thank you for listening