analysis of statistics 2013 - european court of human rights · echr – analysis of statistics...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Analysis of statistics 2013
January 2014
![Page 2: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 2/60
Table of contents Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2013 ................................................................. 4
A. Number of new applications ............................................................................ 4
B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications ................................. 4
C. Processing of applications ............................................................................... 4
1. Pre-allocation ............................................................................................ 4
2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions ........................................................... 4
3. Communicated applications ......................................................................... 4
4. Judgments ................................................................................................ 4
5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court) ........................ 5
D. Priority policy ................................................................................................ 5
General information ............................................................................................... 6 Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation ......................................... 7
Processing of applications ................................................................................... 9
Country-specific information .................................................................................. 14 Albania ............................................................................................................ 14
Andorra ........................................................................................................... 15
Armenia .......................................................................................................... 16
Austria ............................................................................................................ 17
Azerbaijan ....................................................................................................... 18
Belgium ........................................................................................................... 19
Bosnia and Herzegovina .................................................................................... 20
Bulgaria .......................................................................................................... 21
Croatia ............................................................................................................ 22
Cyprus ............................................................................................................ 23
Czech Republic ................................................................................................. 24
Denmark ......................................................................................................... 25
Estonia ............................................................................................................ 26
Finland ............................................................................................................ 27
France ............................................................................................................. 28
Georgia ........................................................................................................... 29
Germany ......................................................................................................... 30
Greece ............................................................................................................ 31
Hungary .......................................................................................................... 32
Iceland ............................................................................................................ 33
Ireland ............................................................................................................ 34
Italy ................................................................................................................ 35
Latvia ............................................................................................................. 36
Liechtenstein ................................................................................................... 37
![Page 3: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 3/60
Lithuania ......................................................................................................... 38
Luxembourg .................................................................................................... 39
Malta .............................................................................................................. 40
Republic of Moldova .......................................................................................... 41
Monaco ........................................................................................................... 42
Montenegro ..................................................................................................... 43
Netherlands ..................................................................................................... 44
Norway ........................................................................................................... 45
Poland ............................................................................................................. 46
Portugal .......................................................................................................... 47
Romania .......................................................................................................... 48
Russia ............................................................................................................. 49
San Marino ...................................................................................................... 50
Serbia ............................................................................................................. 51
Slovakia .......................................................................................................... 52
Slovenia .......................................................................................................... 53
Spain .............................................................................................................. 54
Sweden ........................................................................................................... 55
Switzerland ...................................................................................................... 56
“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” ...................................................... 57
Turkey ............................................................................................................ 58
Ukraine ........................................................................................................... 59
United Kingdom ................................................................................................ 60
![Page 4: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 4/60
Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2013
A. Number of new applications In 2013 65,900 applications were allocated to a judicial formation, an overall increase of 2% compared with 2012 (64,900). 45,750 of these were identified as Single-Judge cases likely to be declared inadmissible (a decrease of 7% in relation to 2012). 20,150 were identified as probable Chamber or Committee1 cases (an increase of 27%).
B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications 93,396 applications were disposed of judicially, an increase of 6% in relation to 2012 (87,879). The number of cases disposed of therefore exceeded those allocated by approximately 27,500 (i.e. a monthly surplus of almost 2,300). As a result, the stock of allocated applications pending before the Court decreased over the year, by 22% from 128,100 to 99,900.
C. Processing of applications
1. Pre-allocation
Before a case is allocated to a judicial formation applicants are required to complete the application form and submit the necessary supporting documents on pain of administrative disposal. As at 31 December 2013 the number of applications pending at this pre-judicial stage stood at 21,950, an increase of 8% in relation to the same date the previous year (20,300). The number of applications disposed of administratively in 2013 was 13,600, a decrease of 27%.
2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions
In 2013 89,737 applications were declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Single Judge, a Committee or a Chamber, a 4% increase compared with 2012 (86,201). The Single-Judge formation decided 80,583 cases in 2013, a decrease of 1% compared with 2012 (81,764). The number of applications struck out, in a decision or a judgment, following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration, decreased by 1% in 2013 (1,890 compared to 1,909 in 2012). Friendly settlements (1,481) increased by 14% (1,303 in 2012), but there were 33% fewer unilateral declarations (409 compared to 606 in 2012).
3. Communicated applications
Where an application is not on its face inadmissible, it is communicated to the respondent Government. In 2013 7,931 applications were communicated (an increase of 51% in relation to 2012 when 5,236 applications were communicated). This increase is due to the introduction of new working methods for well-established case-law cases in particular for Ukrainian or Serbian non-enforcement cases.
4. Judgments
Judgments were delivered in respect of 3,659 applications (compared with 1,678 in 2012 – an increase of 118%). A significant proportion of these applications were joined with the result that the number of judgments actually delivered was 916, a decrease of 16%. 219 judgments were adopted by a three-judge Committee formation under the procedure
1 Committee competence provided for in Article 28 § 1 b) of the Convention.
![Page 5: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60
introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications. 81% of those applications concerned the Ukrainian non-enforcement cases.
5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court)
The total number of decisions on interim measures (1,591) decreased by 20% compared with 2012 (1,979). The Court granted requests for interim measures in 108 cases (an increase of 5% compared with 103 in 2012) and dismissed them in 817 cases (32% less than the 1,203 in 2012). The remainder fell outside the scope of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.
D. Priority policy2 In June 2009 the Court adopted a priority policy establishing seven different categories. The essence of this policy is to concentrate more resources on the most important cases, namely the cases falling within the top three categories (“priority applications”). At 31 December 2013 there were 7,368 applications in these categories. The number of priority applications dealt with in 2013 decreased by 14% compared to 2012. 17% less priority applications were communicated to the respondent Governments in comparison with 2012. The number of priority applications declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Chamber or Committee decreased by 31%. A number of priority cases are awaiting leading decisions or judgments (in particular for expulsion cases) or the outcome of a pilot judgment (for example in conditions of detention cases). Another factor explaining the decrease compared to 2012 is that in that year a large number of cases concerning expulsion to Somalia were struck out. The number of priority applications struck out following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration rose from 158 in 2012 to 247 in 2013. The number of priority applications giving rise to a judgment decreased by 5% in 2013.
2 An explanation of the Court’s priority policy can be found on the Court’s internet site http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Priority_policy_ENG.pdf
![Page 6: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 6/60
General information
Table 1 General statistical information
65900 64900 2%
2013 2012 +/-
7931 5236 51%
2013 2012 +/-
93396 87879 6%
3659 1678 118%
89737 86201 4%
31/12/2013 1/1/2013 +/-
99900 128100 -22%39000 43050 -9%34400 25200 37%26500 59850 -56%
31/12/2013 1/1/2013 +/-
21950 20300 8%
2013 2012 +/-
13600 18700 -27%
1. Applications allocated to a judicial formation2013 2012 +/-
[round figures (50)]
Applications allocated
2. Interim procedural eventsApplications communicated to respondent Government
3. Applications decidedBy decision or judgment
- by judgment delivered
5. Pre-judicial applications [round figures (50)]
Applications at a pre-judicial stage
Applications disposed of administratively (applications not pursued)
- by decision (inadmissible or struck out)
4. Pending applications [round figures (50)]
Applications pending before a judicial formation
- Chamber (7 judges) - Committee (3 judges) - Single-Judge formation
![Page 7: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 7/60
Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation3
Chart 1 Applications allocated to a judicial formation per year
Chart 2 Applications pending before a judicial formation
3 Figures represent the total number of applications, including joined applications. The document generally gives round figures. The upsurge in applications allocated in 2002 was due to a change in working methods, transferring much of the screening of inadmissible applications from the administrative, pre-judicial phase to the judicial stage.
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
1050013800
28200 2720032500
3540039200
41600
49700
5700061100
64300 64900 65900
15900 1980029400
38500
5000056800
66500
79400
97300
119300
139650151600
128100
99900
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
![Page 8: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 8/60
Chart 3 High case-count States (more than 1,800 applications pending before a judicial formation)
Chart 4 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation4
4 The “Pending Government action” category was created to monitor applications following a judgment applying the pilot procedure.
Russia1680016,8%
Italy1440014,4%
Ukraine1330013,3%
Serbia1125011,3%
Turkey1095011,0%
Romania61506,2%
United Kingdom 25002,5%
Georgia24502,5%
Bulgaria24502,5%
Slovenia18001,8%
remaining 37 States1785017,9%
Total number of pending applications: 99,900
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)2671226,7%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)5562455,7%
Communicated1258512,6%
Pending Government action41364,1%
Admissible834
0,8%
Total applications99,900
![Page 9: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 9/60
Chart 5 The Court’s total caseload by category
Processing of applications
Chart 6 Major procedural steps in processing of applications
Cat. I871
0,9%Cat. II334
0,3%
Cat. III63206,3%
Cat. IV1768917,7%
Cat. V4796548,0%
Cat. VI-VII2671226,7%
Total applications99,900
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Applications
judgment delivered 757 934 889 736 816 1208 1719 1734 1880 2393 2607 1511 1678 3659
Applicationscommunicated 1463 1573 1686 1717 2447 2956 3232 3456 4416 6203 6674 5360 5236 7931
Applicationsinadmissibleor struck out
6779 8992 17865 17272 20350 27612 28160 27059 30163 33067 38575 50677 86201 89737
![Page 10: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 10/60
Chart 7 Number of judgments since 2000
Chart 8 Applications in categories I, II and III processed from 2011 to 2013
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
695
888 844
703 718
1105
15601503
15431625
1499
11571093
916
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2011 2012 2013
1342
1563
1303
573
921
771
412
546 517communicated
decision
judgment
![Page 11: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 11/60
Table 2 Applications allocated per Contracting State and population
The Council of Europe member States had a combined population of about 822 million inhabitants on 1 January 2013. The average number of applications allocated per 10,000 inhabitants was 0.80 in 2013.
State
2010 2011 2012 2013 1.1.2010 1.1.2011 1.1.2012 1.1.2013 2010 2011 2012 2013
Albania 94 84 111 106 3185 2832 3195 3195 0,30 0,30 0,35 0,33Andorra 8 8 6 2 85 85 85 76 0,94 0,94 0,71 0,26Armenia 197 173 238 196 3249 3263 3274 3274 0,61 0,53 0,73 0,60Austria 438 387 377 437 8375 8404 8443 8452 0,52 0,46 0,45 0,52Azerbaijan 335 501 342 325 8998 9111 9235 9356 0,37 0,55 0,37 0,35Belgium 302 251 268 270 10840 11001 11041 11162 0,28 0,23 0,24 0,24Bosnia and Herzegovina
661 508 430 871 3844 3843 3829 3829 1,72 1,32 1,12 2,27
Bulgaria 1350 1200 1274 1209 7564 7369 7327 7285 1,78 1,63 1,74 1,66Croatia 992 1186 1905 1842 4426 4412 4398 4262 2,24 2,69 4,33 4,32Cyprus 118 69 78 144 819 840 862 866 1,44 0,82 0,90 1,66Czech Republic 604 522 547 481 10507 10487 10505 10516 0,57 0,50 0,52 0,46Denmark 96 111 103 85 5535 5561 5581 5603 0,17 0,20 0,18 0,15Estonia 266 346 301 237 1340 1340 1340 1325 1,99 2,58 2,25 1,79Finland 379 431 314 315 5351 5375 5401 5427 0,71 0,80 0,58 0,58France 1614 1594 1344 1538 64694 65048 65398 65633 0,25 0,25 0,21 0,23Georgia 375 395 367 157 4436 4469 4498 4498 0,85 0,88 0,82 0,35Germany 1681 1757 1492 1528 81802 81752 81844 82021 0,21 0,21 0,18 0,19Greece 626 668 722 726 11305 11310 11291 11063 0,55 0,59 0,64 0,66Hungary 437 654 735 990 10014 9986 9958 9909 0,44 0,65 0,74 1,00Iceland 15 10 10 9 318 318 320 322 0,47 0,31 0,31 0,28Ireland 62 54 55 61 4468 4570 4583 4591 0,14 0,12 0,12 0,13Italy 3850 4708 3246 3184 60340 60626 60821 59685 0,64 0,78 0,53 0,53Latvia 270 291 286 322 2248 2075 2042 2024 1,20 1,40 1,40 1,59Liechtenstein 15 9 16 7 36 36 36 37 4,17 2,50 4,44 1,89Lithuania 242 305 373 428 3329 3053 3008 2972 0,73 1,00 1,24 1,44Luxemburg 45 24 31 38 502 512 525 537 0,90 0,47 0,59 0,71Malta 23 22 26 50 414 415 416 421 0,56 0,53 0,63 1,19Republic of Moldova 938 1017 934 1356 3564 3560 3560 3559 2,63 2,86 2,62 3,81Monaco 14 8 5 10 33 33 36 36 4,24 2,42 1,39 2,78Montenegro 306 314 180 293 616 618 618 623 4,97 5,08 2,91 4,70Netherlands 687 800 675 778 16575 16656 16730 16780 0,41 0,48 0,40 0,46Norway 87 155 101 148 4858 4920 4986 5051 0,18 0,32 0,20 0,29Poland 5768 5022 4071 3990 38167 38530 38538 38533 1,51 1,30 1,06 1,04Portugal 182 165 217 267 10638 10572 10542 10487 0,17 0,16 0,21 0,25Romania 5818 5124 6768 5422 21462 21414 21356 20057 2,71 2,39 3,17 2,70Russia 14293 12454 10746 12330 141915 142857 143056 143056 1,01 0,87 0,75 0,86San Marino 4 0 1 4 31 32 32 34 1,29 0,00 0,31 1,18Serbia 1567 3726 4894 5061 7307 7276 7241 7182 2,14 5,12 6,76 7,05Slovak Republic 566 553 531 464 5425 5392 5404 5411 1,04 1,03 0,98 0,86Slovenia 837 424 422 495 2047 2050 2055 2059 4,09 2,07 2,05 2,40Spain 670 802 694 784 45989 46153 46196 46704 0,15 0,17 0,15 0,17Sweden 1080 1942 546 362 9341 9416 9483 9556 1,16 2,06 0,58 0,38Switzerland 368 358 326 445 7786 7870 7955 8039 0,47 0,45 0,41 0,55"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
399 352 350 539 2053 2057 2060 2062 1,94 1,71 1,70 2,61
Turkey 5724 8651 8986 3521 72561 73723 74724 75627 0,79 1,17 1,20 0,47Ukraine 3953 4614 7791 13152 45783 45598 45453 45373 0,86 1,01 1,71 2,90United Kingdom 2745 1542 1702 912 62027 62499 62990 63888 0,44 0,25 0,27 0,14Total 61101 64291 64937 65891 816202 819319 822271 822458 0,75 0,78 0,79 0,80SOURCES 2012 et 2013: Internet sites of the Eurostat service (“Population and social conditions” ) or from the United Nations Statistics Division.
Applications allocated to a judicial formation
Population (1000)
Allocated/population(10000)
![Page 12: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 12/60
Table 3 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation
State
Single Judge or
Committee (cat. VI - VII)
Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)
CommunicatedPending
Government action
Admissible TOTAL
Albania 94 170 159 4 427Andorra 0 0 1 0 1Armenia 116 758 68 1 943Austria 89 72 43 9 213Azerbaijan 84 1041 165 3 1293Belgium 17 280 55 12 364Bosnia and Herzegovina 813 385 69 5 1272Bulgaria 1715 618 103 7 2443Croatia 203 625 146 15 989Cyprus 83 38 47 1 169Czech Republic 472 81 33 5 591Denmark 8 7 8 0 23Estonia 288 35 14 3 340Finland 127 31 34 5 197France 244 255 131 15 645Georgia 65 2223 163 2 2453Germany 320 141 36 5 502Greece 56 948 272 21 1297Hungary 943 692 101 3 1739Iceland 5 2 4 0 11Ireland 11 4 5 2 22Italy 650 12101 804 793 31 14379Latvia 321 125 80 4 530Liechtenstein 0 3 3 0 6Lithuania 83 98 61 8 250Luxembourg 6 4 2 1 13Malta 13 35 16 0 64Republic of Moldova 366 767 248 20 13 1414Monaco 0 3 0 3 6Montenegro 629 139 23 1 792Netherlands 152 225 74 2 453Norway 67 2 19 3 91Poland 363 1015 258 12 1648Portugal 25 149 56 2 232Romania 564 1428 923 3197 61 6173Russia 9499 4835 2251 126 102 16813San Marino 1 3 1 0 5Serbia 2667 7081 1435 47 11230Slovakia 65 104 55 16 240Slovenia 1519 173 84 6 1782Spain 249 47 93 4 393Sweden 26 27 33 7 93Switzerland 76 121 64 10 271"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
42 169 129 5 345
Turkey 398 8453 1997 83 10931Ukraine 2866 7992 2136 290 13284United Kingdom 312 2119 83 5 2519
ALL STATES 26712 55624 12585 4136 834 99891
![Page 13: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 13/60
Table 4 Unilateral declarations and friendly settlements in the past three years
State
2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013Albania 1 2 0 1 1Andorra 0 0 0 0Armenia 6 2 0 0Austria 0 0 8 1 1Azerbaijan 1 0 3 2 1 11Belgium 1 0 0 0 3Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 3 78 43 176Bulgaria 5 28 4 9 85 19Croatia 0 6 3 11 18 31Cyprus 0 0 0 0Czech Republic 0 7 20 10 4 12Denmark 0 0 0 6 1Estonia 0 0 2 0 1Finland 1 4 1 2 8 3France 1 4 2 7 2 2Georgia 0 1 3 2 4 11Germany 0 1 2 1 2 3Greece 0 0 14 3 55Hungary 0 2 3 45 53 73Iceland 0 0 0 0Ireland 0 0 2 1 3Italy 0 0 44 7 117 4Latvia 1 1 3 1Liechtenstein 1 0 0 0Lithuania 1 0 1 0 0Luxembourg 0 0 0 0Malta 0 2 0 0Republic of Moldova 62 5 21 15 13 8Monaco 0 0 0 1Montenegro 0 0 0 1 19Netherlands 0 0 1 0 1 2Norway 0 0 0 0Poland 44 40 41 154 111 93Portugal 5 1 5 12 10 4Romania 30 61 38 21 35 29Russia 205 100 102 12 3 39San Marino 1 1 1Serbia 10 3 9 69 415 679Slovakia 2 3 4 29 9 23Slovenia 2 0 0 1Spain 0 0 0 0 1Sweden 0 0 0 1Switzerland 0 0 0 0The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia' 12 1 48 28 67 55Turkey 39 14 27 115 99 86Ukraine 262 313 23 161 178 28United Kingdom 10 2 4 9 7 5Grand Total 703 606 409 829 1303 1481
Unilateral declaration Friendly settlement
![Page 14: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Country-specific information
Albania
Chart 9 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 10 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)94
22%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)17040%
Communicated15937%
Admissible4
1%
Total applications427
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2011 2012 2013
84
111106
46
58
48
17
39
70
510 9
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 15: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 15/60
Andorra
Chart 11 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 12 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Communicated1
100%
Total applications1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2011 2012 2013
8
6
2
4
15
6
2
0 00
2
0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 16: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 16/60
Armenia
Chart 13 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 14 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)11612%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)75881%
Communicated687%
Admissible1
0,1%
Total applications943
0
50
100
150
200
250
2011 2012 2013
173
238
196
144
229
195
16 11 19
516
2
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 17: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 17/60
Austria
Chart 15 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 16 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)89
42%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)72
34%
Communicated43
20%
Admissible9
4%
Total applications213
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2011 2012 2013
387 377437
334
549
611
21 14 2718 23 22
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 18: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 18/60
Azerbaijan
Chart 17 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 18 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)84
6,5%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)104180,5%
Communicated165
12,8%
Admissible3
0,2%
Total applications1 293
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2011 2012 2013
501
342 325
62
694
284
45 34
115
25 3713
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 19: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 19/60
Belgium
Chart 19 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 20 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)175%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)28077%
Communicated55
15%
Admissible123%
Total applications364
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2011 2012 2013
251268 270265
468
253
18 2737
9 6 9
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 20: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 20/60
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chart 21 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 22 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)81364%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)38530%
Communicated696%
Admissible5
0%
Total applications1 272
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2011 2012 2013
508430
871
410 361
1019
7929
213
33 12 26
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 21: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 21/60
Bulgaria
Chart 23 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 24 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)171570%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)61826%
Communicated1034%
Admissible7
0%
Total applications2 443
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2011 2012 2013
1200 1274 1209
543
1425
2552
141 85 4473 72 26
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 22: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 22/60
Croatia
Chart 25 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 26 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)20321%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)62563%
Communicated14615%
Admissible151%
Total applications989
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2011 2012 2013
1186
19051842
1014
2392
2047
65 59142
49 22 24
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 23: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 23/60
Cyprus
Chart 27 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 28 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)83
49%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)38
22%
Communicated47
28%
Admissible1
1%
Total applications169
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2011 2012 2013
6978
144
43
55
163
39
2 33 0 1
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 24: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 24/60
Czech Republic
Chart 29 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 30 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)47280%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)81
14%
Communicated335%
Admissible5
1%
Total applications591
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2011 2012 2013
522 547481
588
773827
46 43 3629 30 11
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 25: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 25/60
Denmark
Chart 31 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 32 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)8
35%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)7
30%
Communicated8
35%
Total applications23
0
50
100
150
200
250
2011 2012 2013
111103
8599
201
88
16 8 66 1 0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 26: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 26/60
Estonia
Chart 33 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 34 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)288
84,7%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)35
10,3%
Communicated14
4,1% Admissible3
0,9%
Total applications340
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2011 2012 2013
346301
237229269
533
12 8 93 8 6
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 27: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 27/60
Finland
Chart 35 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 36 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)127
64,5%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)31
15,7%
Communicated34
17,3%
Admissible5
2,5%
Total applications197
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2011 2012 2013
431
314 315
485
615
300
24 24 217 5 3
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 28: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 28/60
France
Chart 37 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 38 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)24438%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)25540%
Communicated13120%
Admissible152%
Total applications645
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2011 2012 2013
1594
134415381485
2518
2391
105 45 7432 32 36
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 29: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 29/60
Georgia
Chart 39 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 40 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)653%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)222390%
Communicated1637%
Admissible2
0,1%
Total applications2 453
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2011 2012 2013
395367
157160
521577
51 30 384 12 2
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 30: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 30/60
Germany
Chart 41 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 42 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)32064%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)14128%
Communicated367%
Admissible5
1%
Total applications502
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2011 2012 2013
1757
14921528
1095
2468
3033
32 22 2446 23 7
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 31: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 31/60
Greece
Chart 43 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 44 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)564%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)94873%
Communicated27221%
Admissible212%
Total applications1 297
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2011 2012 2013
668722 726
179
861
472
112 93
188
73 58 43
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 32: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 32/60
Hungary
Chart 45 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 46 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)94354%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)69240%
Communicated1016%
Admissible3
0,2%
Total applications1 739
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2011 2012 2013
654
735
990
224
840
1048
99 106 124
34 27 42
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 33: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 33/60
Iceland
Chart 47 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 48 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)5
46%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)2
18%
Communicated4
36%
Total applications11
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2011 2012 2013
10 10
9
14
1011
0
2 2
0
2
0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 34: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 34/60
Ireland
Chart 49 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 50 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)11
50%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)4
18%
Communicated5
23%
Admissible2
9%
Total applications22
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2011 2012 2013
54 55
61
77
63 63
4
8
22 2 2
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 35: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 35/60
Italy
Chart 51 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 52 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)6505%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)1210184%
Communicated8046%
Pending Government action793
5,5%
Admissible310%
Total applications14 379
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
2011 2012 2013
4708
3246 3184
556
2693
2872
214 148 6284 122 76
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 36: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 36/60
Latvia
Chart 53 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 54 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)32160%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)12524%
Communicated80
15%Admissible
41%
Total applications530
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2011 2012 2013
291286
322
300 296307
3016 1912 14 10
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 37: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 37/60
Liechtenstein
Chart 55 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 56 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)3
50%Communicated3
50%
Total applications6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2011 2012 2013
9
16
7
10
1514
2
0
3
0 01
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 38: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 38/60
Lithuania
Chart 57 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 58 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)83
33%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)98
39%
Communicated61
25%
Admissible8
3%
Total applications250
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2011 2012 2013
305
373428
152
705
416
22 26 1510 12 12
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 39: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 39/60
Luxembourg
Chart 59 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 60 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)6
46%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)4
31%
Communicated2
15%
Admissible1
8%
Total applications13
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2011 2012 2013
24
31
38
66
30 31
21 23 2 2
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 40: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 40/60
Malta
Chart 61 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 62 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)13
20%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)35
55%
Communicated16
25%
Total applications64
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2011 2012 2013
22
26
50
6
20
12
4
12 913
3
10
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 41: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 41/60
Republic of Moldova
Chart 63 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 64 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)36626%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)76754%
Communicated24818%
Pending Government action
201% Admissible
131%
Total applications1 414
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2011 2012 2013
1017 934
1356
550
1905
3143
11856 8542 32 19
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 42: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 42/60
Monaco
Chart 65 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 66 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)3
50%
Admissible3
50%
Total applications6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2011 2012 2013
8
5
10
14
7
10
1
5
00 0
3
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 43: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 43/60
Montenegro
Chart 67 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 68 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)62979%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)13918%
Communicated233%
Admissible1
0%
Total applications792
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2011 2012 2013
314
180
293
135
181
342
244 158 15
3
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 44: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 44/60
Netherlands
Chart 69 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 70 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)15234%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)22550%
Communicated74
16%
Admissible2
0,4%
Total applications453
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2011 2012 2013
800
675
778
485
859
1389
27 37 426 7 1
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 45: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 45/60
Norway
Chart 71 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 72 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)67
74%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)2
2%
Communicated19
21%
Admissible3
3%
Total applications91
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2011 2012 2013
155
101
148
102
165
115
4 2
17
1 4 4
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 46: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 46/60
Poland
Chart 73 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 74 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)363
22,0%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)101561,6%
Communicated258
15,7%
Admissible12
0,7%
Total applications1 648
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
2011 2012 2013
5022
40713990
5038
7283
5388
247 192 15472 74 23
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 47: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 47/60
Portugal
Chart 75 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 76 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)25
11%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)14964%
Communicated56
24%
Admissible2
1%
Total applications232
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2011 2012 2013
165
217
267
123
239236
35
37
26
48
2513
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 48: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 48/60
Romania
Chart 77 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 78 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)5649%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)142823%
Communicated92315%
Pending Government action319752%
Admissible61
1,0%
Total applications6 173
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
2011 2012 2013
5124
67685422
4585
10066
7697
916439 384
105 155 166
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 49: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 49/60
Russian Federation
Chart 79 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 80 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)949956%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)483529%
Communicated225113%
Pending Government action126
0,7%
Admissible102
0,6%
Total applications16 813
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
2011 2012 2013
12454
107461233012223
2214223845
734 796 699199 216 257
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 50: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 50/60
San Marino
Chart 81 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 82 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)1
20%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)3
60%
Communicated1
20%
Total applications5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
2011 2012 2013
0
1
4
3
1 1
3
0
11 1
0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 51: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 51/60
Serbia
Chart 83 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 84 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)266724%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)708163%
Communicated143513%
Admissible47
0,4%
Total applications11 230
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2011 2012 2013
3726
4894 5061
449
1599
3685
451
905
1421
12 39193
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 52: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 52/60
Slovakia
Chart 85 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 86 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)65
27%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)10443%
Communicated55
23%
Admissible167%
Total applications240
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2011 2012 2013
553 531
464
694
1079
684
9643
5621 23 16
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 53: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 53/60
Slovenia
Chart 87 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 88 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)151985%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)17310%
Communicated845%
Admissible6
0,3%
Total applications1 782
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2011 2012 2013
424 422495517
1517
896
90 90 4816 22 25
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 54: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 54/60
Spain
Chart 89 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 90 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)24963%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)47
12%
Communicated93
24%
Admissible4
1%
Total applications393
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2011 2012 2013
802
694
784871 895
1029
46 26 4215 11 13
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 55: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 55/60
Sweden
Chart 91 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 92 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)26
28%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)27
29%
Communicated33
35%
Admissible7
8%
Total applications93
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2011 2012 2013
1942
546362
2586
894
365
38 32 104 15 16
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 56: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 56/60
Switzerland
Chart 93 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 94 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)76
28%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)12145%
Communicated64
23%
Admissible10
3,7%
Total applications271
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2011 2012 2013
358
326
445
130
341
1197
13 23 2411 8 13
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 57: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 57/60
“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
Chart 95 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 96 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)42
12%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)16949%
Communicated12937%
Admissible5
1,4%
Total applications345
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2011 2012 2013
352 350
539
380
618
850
38
155 126
6 8 9
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 58: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 58/60
Turkey
Chart 97 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 98 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)3984%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)845377%
Communicated199718%
Admissible831%
Total applications10 931
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
2011 2012 2013
8651 8986
3521
7527 7914
9011
458422 508
229 134 190
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 59: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 59/60
Ukraine
Chart 99 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 100 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)286622%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)799260%
Communicated213616%
Admissible2902%
Total applications13 284
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
2011 2012 2013
4614
7791
13152
4647
73058049
743 1032
2934
107 301
2281
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered
![Page 60: Analysis of statistics 2013 - European Court of Human Rights · ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050212/5f5e829d77f9c026b23bbb60/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 60/60
United Kingdom
Chart 101 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 102 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)31213%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)211984%
Communicated833%
Admissible5
0%
Total applications2 519
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2011 2012 2013
1542
1702
9121028
2047
1633
60 48 3530 35 19
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgmentsdelivered