analysts: christopher carson, mark latimer, applied ... · balance sheet. financial dashboard...

Applied Portfolio ManagementAnalysts: Christopher Carson, Mark Latimer,

Harshad Phadke and Dakota McMahon

Report Date: 5/8/2015Market Cap (mm) $9,642 Annual Dividend $3.07 2-Yr Beta (S&P 500 Index) 0.82Return on Capital 9.8% Dividend Yield 7.7% Annualized Alpha -31.3% Compared With:

EPS (ttm) $2.33 Price/Earnings (ttm) 17.0 Institutional Ownership 4.2% Williams Companies, Inc.Current Price $39.63 Economic Value-Added (ttm) $627 Short Interest (% of Shares) 3.1% Kinder Morgan, Inc.

12-mo. Target Price $45.00 Free Cash Flow Margin -3.6% Days to Cover Short 8.4 and the S&P 500 Index

Business Description

Total Revenue 2.5% Free Cash Flow -293.9%EBIT 6.7% Total Invested Capital 25.8%

NOPAT 6.7% Total Assets 17.8%Earnings Per Share -11.4% Economic Value-Added -2.5%

Dividends Per Share 9.1% Market Value-Added -22.6%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

6.5% 8.3% 9.4% 7.5% 9.4%1.6% 0.6% -6.0% -7.8% -3.6%4.4% 5.8% 5.6% 4.5% 5.9%5.7% 4.1% 5.0% 5.5% 7.7%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

1.75 3.35 3.04 2.35 2.332.25 2.37 2.69 2.89 3.072.71 4.55 4.35 3.90 4.635.43 0.80 (4.21) (3.04) (4.88)

Datasource: Capital IQ

ONEOK Partners, L.P. Sector: Energy BUYOKS

ONEOK Partners, L.P. engages in the gathering, processing, storage, and transportation of natural gas in the United States. It operates in three segments: Natural Gas Gathering and Processing; Natural Gas Liquids; and Natural Gas Pipelines. The Natural Gas Gathering and Processing segment gathers and processes natural gas produced from crude oil and natural gas wells located in the Mid-Continent region; and gathers and processes natural gas in the Williston Basin, which spans portions of Montana and North Dakota, and the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. The Natural Gas Liquids segment gathers, treats,

Investment Thesis

ANNUALIZED 3-YEAR CAGR

Since we believe that US economy is reaching the peak of expansionary cycle, we seek to overweight our portfolio with few quality dividend stocks from risk-off sectors. OKS is one such stock that grabbed our attention with its proven record of high dividend yield and healthy balance sheet. Financial dashboard indicates that OKS has gained operating efficiency in recent years, as EBIT and NOPAT are increasing at a faster rate than the revenue. What is even more impressive is the dividend growth rate has trumped the margins. This shows management's commitment towards increasing distribution to its investors. In recent years OKS has positioned itself for growth in the midstream sector by focusing on natural gas liquids. We believe that cash flows from increased capital investment and acquisitions will soon start adding to the bottom line profits. As one of the largest

Margins and Yields

Operating Margin

Per Share Metrics

Earnings

NOPATFree Cash Flow

Dividends

Free Cash Flow MarginEarnings YieldDividend Yield

-30%-25%-20%-15%-10%

-5%0%5%

10%15%20%

OKS ^SPX

-30%-20%-10%

0%10%20%30%40%50%

OKS WMB KMI

020406080

100120140160180200

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Price/Earnings Price/Free Cash Flow

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

EBIT Net Operating Profit After Tax

$0$1,000$2,000$3,000$4,000$5,000$6,000$7,000$8,000$9,000

$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Economic Value-Added Market Valued-Added

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

ROA ROE ROIC

Recommendation: Buy Market Cap: $10,647.5 million

Current Price: $39.63

Sector: Energy Dividend Yield: 7.53% 12‐Month Target: 45.00

Annual Dividend: $3.07 P/E Ratio: 17.00 Beta: 0.31

Highlights

Low 1‐yr Beta of 0.31 with a P/E within reasonable range of 12‐18

Strong commitment to increasing dividends

High Dividend yield of 7.53%, due to a sharp price drop in recent year

Well positioned to take advantage of expansion in use of natural gas

New pipeline construction from Permian Basin to Mexico to open a huge market

At a current price of $42, and an intrinsic value of $77.93 for FCF model and $159 for DDM,

OKS is undervalued by 85.55% and 378.57% respectively

Macroeconomic Outlook

There is strong evidence that the

employment picture in the United

States continues to improve. A strong

dollar is weighing on exports which may

hurt domestic producers, however,

cheap commodities is working to

suppress an increase in trade deficit.

Manufacturing sales, personal income,

non‐farm payrolls and industrial

production are all signaling that

currently the economy is in a state of expansion. However, consumer sentiment has a role to play

in the direction of the economy going forward. If consumers are happy with economic conditions

they will act like it by ramping up purchases etc. The reading of consumer sentiment gives us

pause, coupled with a rise in unit labor cost gives us an indication that we are in the middle of an

expansion cycle, means that while things are going to keep growing, we predict that they will

grow at a slower rate, but that we do not expected an actual decline in the near future ‐ which is

what our diffusion index say. While we do have our hesitations about the future, nothing

indicates a certain immediate impending disaster. Our conclusion would be that we are in the

middle of an expansion, but should be vigilant in continuing to monitor leading indicators.

Business Description

ONEOK Partners, L.P. engages in the gathering, processing, storage, and transportation of natural

gas in the United States. It operates in three segments: Natural Gas Gathering and Processing;

Natural Gas Liquids; and Natural Gas Pipelines. The Natural Gas Gathering and Processing

segment gathers and processes natural gas produced from crude oil and natural gas wells located

in the Mid‐Continent region; and gathers and processes natural gas in the Williston Basin, which

spans portions of Montana and North Dakota, and the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. The

Natural Gas Liquids segment gathers, treats, fractionates, and transports natural gas liquids

(NGLs), as well as stores, markets and distributes NGL products primarily in Oklahoma, Kansas,

Texas, New Mexico, and the Rocky Mountain region.

This segment also owns the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)‐regulated NGLs

gathering and distribution pipelines in Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, New Mexico, Montana, North

Dakota, Wyoming, and Colorado; terminal and storage facilities in Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, and

Illinois; and FERC‐regulated NGLs distribution and refined petroleum product pipelines in Kansas,

Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana. The Natural Gas Pipelines segment owns and

operates regulated natural gas transmission pipelines and natural gas storage facilities; and

provides interstate natural gas transportation and storage services. This segment’s interstate

natural gas pipeline assets transport natural gas through FERC‐regulated interstate natural gas

pipelines in North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee,

Oklahoma, Texas, and New Mexico. It also transports intrastate natural gas through its assets in

Oklahoma; and owns underground natural gas storage facilities in Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas.

ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C. serves as the general partner of ONEOK Partners, L.P. The company

was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

The adjacent graph shows the sharp

drop in stock price of OKS in last one

year. OKS stock has lost about 21%,

whereas S&P 500 index gained over

10% during the same period.

Investment Thesis

Since we believe that US economy is reaching the peak of expansionary cycle, we seek to

overweight our portfolio with few quality dividend stocks from risk‐off sectors. OKS is one such

stock that grabbed our attention with its proven record of high dividend yield and healthy balance

sheet. Financial dashboard indicates that OKS has gained operating efficiency in recent years, as

EBIT and NOPAT are increasing at a faster rate than the revenue. What is even more impressive

is the dividend growth rate has trumped the margins. This shows management's commitment

towards increasing distribution to its investors. In recent years OKS has positioned itself for

growth in the midstream sector by focusing on natural gas liquids. We believe that cash flows

from increased capital investment and acquisitions will soon start adding to the bottom line

profits. As one of the largest independent service provider in midcontinent, OKS is well positioned

to take advantage of American energy revolution. Its legacy assets include a large system of gas

gathering and transportation assets in the Mid‐Continent.

As more than two third of the margins are generated through fixed fee based gas storage and

transportation services, OKS’ margins have a little cushion against recent drop in the oil and gas

prices. Since the commodity risk is only partially hedged, we see stressed profit margins in near

future, but the long term growth story is still intact. Through its ownership in six key oil and gas

basins, natural gas gathering processing units, and vast network of pipelines and storage systems,

OKS has become a dominant market supplier of natural gas to the domestic and international

buyers. With more than $5 billion in growth projects underway and entering service through

2015, OKS will further cement its position as a dominant player in NGL midstream services. Given

the strong growth potential and large dividend yield, we believe that OKS will be a great addition

to student portfolio.

Overview of OKS Assets

The following image below depicts prominent shale gas plays and basins in the mid‐continent of

North America. Given OKS’s revenues are solely from the United States, it is important to

understand OKS’s operations within the mid‐continent region. A particular focus will be centered

on the Williston basin in North Dakota and the Permian Basin in Texas.

The red line to the left leads to the

Williston Basin which will be the topic

of discussion for this paragraph. OKS

has a strong foothold in the Williston

Basin which is one of the largest

untapped Basins in North America.

Specifically, OKS is the largest

independent natural gas gatherer and

processor in the Williston Basin

serving 60% of the five million acres.

Approximately half of producers rigs

in the Williston Basin drill in OKS 3

million acre plot. Furthermore, drilling

is economical in the Williston Basin

with crude oil prices (WTI) as low as

$45 per barrel. OKS has 1.4 to 1.9

billion in capital investments

underway in the Williston basin to be

completed by Q3 of 2016. These investments will help OKS establish its pipeline infrastructure

and increase its volume fee based earnings.

Williston Basin: which will be the topic of discussion for this paragraph. OKS has a strong foothold

in the Williston Basin which is one of the largest untapped Basins in North America. Specifically,

OKS is the largest independent natural gas gatherer and processor in the Williston Basin serving

60% of the five million acres. Approximately half of producers rigs in the Williston Basin drill in

OKS 3 million acre plot. Furthermore, drilling is economical in the Williston Basin with crude oil

prices (WTI) as low as $45 per barrel. OKS has 1.4 to 1.9 billion in capital investments underway

in the Williston basin to be completed by Q3 of 2016. These investments will help OKS establish

its pipeline infrastructure and increase its volume fee based earnings.

Permian Basin in west Texas: The Permian Basin is one of the top five reserves in North America

with more than two dozen oil and gas wells in current operation. Similar to the Williston basin

above; drilling is economical in the Permian Basin with crude oil prices (WTI) as low as $47 per

barrel. More recently, OKS has established itself within this region to take advantage of exporting

supplied gas to untapped markets in northern Mexico.

Potential Years of Drilling: Following the

discussion above of OKS and the shale gas plays

and basins the company has established itself in;

an understanding of the potential years of drilling

in each of the Basins is crucial for any sustainable

competitive advantages for the company. The

Bakken shale and Williston Basin in North Dakota

are estimated to provide up to 35 years of

potential drilling. In addition, The Permian Basin in

west Texas is estimated to provide 80 years of

drilling. As a result, both of these regions leave

OKS well positioned for future growth.

Historical Performance

3YR Compound Average Growth Rates

With EBIT and NOPAT growing

faster than total revenue OKS

show operating and tax

efficiencies. Earnings per share

post a value of ‐11.4%. This is due

to the fact that net income

growth has been outpaced by the growth in the number of Total Common Shares over the last 3

years. Dividends per share is a strong value of 9.1% further indicating OKS’s commitment to

increasing dividends. Free cash flow has a three year CAGR of roughly ‐300%. With total invested

capital around 26% and a NOPAT of 6.7%, we would expect Free Cash Flow to be negative but

not to the extent of 300%. Later in the paper will be a discussion on why this is the case for OKS

and how the capital growth projects for OKS will provide. Lastly, although Economic Value‐Added

has decreased, Market Value‐Added has taken a more substantial hit providing a more

undervalued entry point for investors.

Revenue and Margins Analysis

The above graph depicts five key metrics for OKS over an eight year span. To begin, revenue

growth for OKS has been positive each year with the exception of 2009 and 2012. It is important

to note that despite the fluctuations in revenue growth, OKS has been able to maintain relatively

stable gross, EBIT, and net income margins over this same span. The increase in EBIT and gross

margin from 2013 to 2014 indicates that a greater percentage of revenue is available to flow

toward bottom line profits, then to free cash flow that support OKS intrinsic value, and back to

investors in the form of dividends. Furthermore, the graph illustrates OKS strong commitment to

dividends as the company has been increasing dividends per share each year over the past eight.

Effect of Capital Projects on Profitability and Value addition

ROA, ROE, and ROIC have been on a downtrend since 2011. This is a result of net income being

outpaced by an increase in total assets, shareholder equity, and NOPAT respectively. These

metrics are currently near historical averages in 2009 and 2010. With large increases in total

invested capital from 2012 to 2014, outpacing the values for NOPAT, free cash flow has taken a

dive in this period. MVA has followed in a similar suit to EVA until 2014. The substantial fall in

MVA compared to EVA provides a more undervalued entry point for investors.

Debt and Liquidity Analysis

The above graph exhibits six key figures of OKS’s balance sheet for the duration of past 10 years.

It is evident from the graph that both total equity and total debt are on a secular uptrend during

this period. What is important is notice is that OKS has successfully maintained the debt‐to‐equity

ratio in a tight range of 1.24 to 1.78. At the end of FY 2014, this ratio was 1.39. This shows that

OKS’s management is committed to maintain the debt at a manageable level. Next looking at

debt‐to‐asset ratio, which remained constant over the last ten years, we can confirm that most

of the debt is used on purchase tangible capital assets, and not to pay the dividends or share

repurchase program of OKS. The current ratio has come down to 0.46, which is historically at the

lowest point in last decade. But for the company like OKS this should not be a point of concern.

With a $1.7 billion open line of credit that can be extended to $2.4 billion (matures in 2019), OKS

has access to plenty of short term liquidity. Lastly, the times interest covered ratio is a measure

of a company's ability to honor its debt payments. It may be calculated as EBIT divided by the

total interest payable. According to company’s latest 10‐K report, OKS’s management is

committed to keep this ratio above level of 4. With such high level of interest coverage ratio, we

are confident that OKS can honor its interest payment obligations and there is no threat of

bankruptcy at least in the foreseeable future.

Capital projects

Completed and planned capital projects

OKS completed $8 bil of capital

growth projects and acquisitions from

2006 – 2014. There are nearly $3 bil

capital‐growth projects in progress.

OKS has not only continued to

complete capital growth projects on

time and on budget, but also doubled

unannounced capital growth projects

in 2014.

Purpose of the Capital Projects

There are several reasons why OKS is heavily investing in these capital projects. Few of these

reasons are explained below:

OKS is building the first‐ever NGL pipeline to transport NGLs out of the Williston Basin. 24% of

North Dakota’s natural gas production is flared, and North Dakota Industrial Commission (NDIC)

has set policy targets to reduce flaring to 15% by 1Q2016 and 5% – 10% by the 4Q2020. OKS

controls 60% of the 5 million acres are of the Williston basins, and is a natural monopoly in the

region.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s CO2 limits for power plants are likely to accelerate the

decline of coal for electricity generation, which will increased demand for natural gas‐fired

electric generation. OKS will be greatly benefited due to these capital projects, as approximately

35 existing coal‐fired, electric power generation plants within 20 miles of OKS’ natural gas

pipelines.

OKS is also one of the very few midstream gas sector companies to get the access to West Texas

natural gas region and is well positioned to take advantage of the increasing demand of natural

gas in Mexico.

SWOT Analysis Strengths

Pipelines are the Cheapest Transportation Method

Pipelines that transport liquid across great distances are 30% cheaper than rail transportation

and 90% cheaper than transportation by trucks. Pipeline use cuts down on greenhouse gases and

expenses, which should decrease the cost and demand the demand for liquid that are

transported by pipeline.

High Domestic availability of Natural Gas

Plenty of natural gas is found in the United States. This geographic advantage make natural gas

a realistic wholesale solution to domestic fuel needs. It also limits the need for imported fuels,

which save money for government and industries. "Domestic Geographic Locations" will have a

long‐term positive impact on this entity, which adds to its value.

Advantages of Master Limited Partnership

MLPs do not pay corporate taxes on profits which is a huge advantage over corporately

structured companies. Secondly, owners of a partnership are taxed only once and not multiple

times as in the corporate model. Capital gains are considered returns on capital. Lastly, Capital

gain taxes are deferred until the unitholder sells the units.

Recurring Revenue Business

A fee based business in a volatile industry, or recurring revenue businesses in general, can reduce

risk and make business planning easier over the long term. Services to companies in volatile

industries will have lower risk, because they spread the risk over a group of customers that have

even more diverse products under them.

Weaknesses

Low Geographic Diversification (Located only in North America)

Diversification into other countries would involve currency headwinds.

Charges on fees

OKS is limited to what it may charge for its services and fees. OKS make a majority of it’s profit

from fees and services.

Opportunities

Low Price Helps Increase Demand for Natural Gas

As natural gas production becomes more efficient and the EPA imposes more restrictions on

carbon dioxide measures, which directly affects alternatives to natural gas like coal, natural gas

will become more widespread.

Expanding Natural Gas Demand

The discovery of techniques to get natural gas out of shale formations is leading to a boom in

supply, which is decreasing the price of natural gas. When the price of natural gas decreases,

especially relative to the price of oil, demand increases, because consumers switch to the lower

cost fuel.

Low Prices for Natural Gas

The lower natural gas prices go, the more competitive it becomes versus coal on a BTU (energy)

level.

Threats

MLP Regulations

MLP’s may change at any point, which would result in loss of tax advantage.

Volatile Commodity Prices

Volatile commodity prices increase the risk to the company, since a sudden change in commodity

prices can hurt profits. It also makes long‐term forecast more difficult and long‐term investments

to meet demand more difficult. According to OKS’s 10‐K report, 33% of its commodities are

hedged. So this is less of a problem for OKS, but still something to be concerned about.

Porter Five Forces Analysis

Potential of new entrants into industry (Threat Level: Low‐Medium)

OKS has an advantage in how much is needed to create a similar company. A huge investment is

required so this would be a barrier for new entrants. This particular sector is also highly regulated,

meaning for a company to become involved, they must have a great deal of understanding on

how the industry works in order to be successful.

Threat of substitute products (Threat Level: Low)

The threat level of substitute products are low. Substitutes are available, but natural gas will lead.

Other energy sources will still take years until it can be made as affordable as Natural Gas. The

EPA has also stepped up enforcement against carbon dioxide emissions which will benefit the

natural gas sector and dissolve the demand for coal.

Power of suppliers (Threat Level: High)

The high threat for power of suppliers is due to how contracts are negotiated. OKS is contracted

through producers and the producers could choose to work with another company other than

OKS. Since OKS is seen as a monopoly in the industry this could attract the attention of the

government and potentially place restrictions on OKS.

Power of customers (Threat Level: Medium)

A majority of business that OKS does is business to business. Businesses could have more

influence rather than single individuals. Buyers could seek alternative means of transportation

other than what OKS provides which could also be a problem. Fortunately, OKS has a monopoly

in their geographic locations which allows them attract more businesses than a lower level

company.

Competition in the industry (Threat Level: Medium)

OKS secured a deal in Texas for exclusive rights to move Natural Gas. OKS also secured rights to

the Williston Basin in South Dakota in which the own a 60% interest in untapped wells. OKS

currently has a non‐governmental monopoly within the natural gas sector.

U.S. Energy Information Administration Short Term Energy Outlook

The chart on right shows short term

outlook of the Natural Gas Production

and Imports in the United States. As the

net imports expected to keep

decreasing through 2016, the

production of Natural Gas is expected

to keep increasing, though at a slower

rate. Most of this production increase is

expected to come from the non‐Gulf of

Mexico areas, and production from the

Federal Gulf of Mexico is expected to remain almost constant. The total production is expected

to continue to grow through 2016 which is a good sign for OKS.

The chart on left shows the Natural

Gas consumption in the United

States. We can see that the energy

consumption peaks in the winter due

to colder weather, and drops in the

summer as the weather warms up.

EIA forecasts that the Natural Gas

Consumption will continue to

increase in near future. This increase

will be mainly driven by the increase

in the usage of natural gas in electric power generation and industries. The usage of natural gas

in residential and commercial space is expected to decrease.

The chart on the right shows the Natural

Gas Storage in the United States. Again

we can see a wave with peaks in storage

being in the summer when less gas is

being used, and drops in the winter

when more energy is used for heating.

OKS receives about ⅔ of its total

revenue from the fees charged for the

transportation and storage of the

natural gas. The stable outlook of the

natural gas consumption and storage shows that OKS will continue to generate stable fee based

revenues at least in the foreseeable future.

On the left is a chart showing the United

States Electricity Generation by fuel

sectors and forecasts the next 2 years.

The share of Coal powered electricity

generation has dropped around 10%

over the last 7 years. About 7% of this

share has been replaced by natural gas

powered electricity generation. As

natural gas displaces coal for power

generation, the usage of natural gas is

expected to continue to rise over the next year and half.

On the right is the chart of the United

States Natural Gas Prices from Jan

2011 to Jan 2017 (projected). The

chart has two components:

Residential price and Henry Hub spot

rate. Henry Hub spot rate is used for

the commodity derivatives contract

pricing. Again, the Residential

natural gas prices come in waves

peaking in the summer and dropping

in the winter. But as you can see, there is no correlation between the Residential prices and the

Henry Hub spot price.

This chart on left shows that the

Henry Hub natural gas spot price

averaged $2.83/MMBtu in March. EIA

expects monthly average spot prices

to remain less than $4/MMBtu

through the remainder of the

forecast. Current options and futures

prices imply that market participants

place the lower and upper bounds for

the 95% confidence interval for July

2015 contracts at $1.90/MMBtu and $4.00/MMBtu, respectively.

This chart shows the West Texas

Intermediate Crude Oil Prices. Oil

companies provide natural gas, the

important commodity for OKS, which

is why it is important to keep an eye on

the WTI oil prices. From the chart we

can see that the WTI prices are

expected to remain stable now

through Jan 2017. Another positive

factor for OKS stock.

Hedging Activities

OKS is sensitive to changes in natural gas, crude oil

and NGL prices. The chart on the right shows the

gross margins for OKS over the last 5 years and also

the company report forecast for 2015. OKS derives

their revenues in two ways; sales of natural gases

they collect and process and their fee based

operations. As you can see a majority of OKS gross

margin comes from fee based operations, which

derive from storage and transportation services.

Commodities are the gross margins from the sale of

natural gases they collected and processed.

Differentials represent the portion of commodities

that are transformed into other gases such as

Butane, Propane and Ethane. Commodities and differentials make up less than a third of OKS’s

gross margin but, as you can see from the chart below, they only hedge 80% of that third. This

means OKS only hedges around 27% of their gross margins. The rest of their income is from fees,

which can’t be hedged. OKS’s revenue from fees are based on contracts that has an average

length of 7 years, so they are in no danger of losing income in their fee based revenue.

The table above sets forth OKS’ Natural Gas Gathering and processing segment’s hedging

information for the period indicated:

OKS has forecast for how they believe the change in commodity prices will affect their margins.

Their forecasts are as follows: a $0.01 per‐gallon change in the composite price of NGLs would

change 12‐month forward net margin by approximately $3.0 million; a $1.00 per‐barrel change

in the price of crude oil would change 12‐month forward net margin by approximately $1.6

million; and a $0.10 per‐MMBtu change in the price of residue natural gas would change 12‐

month forward net margin by approximately $5.2 million.

Forecasting Assumptions

Revenue Growth: Revenues for OKS’s NGL’s segment are derived primarily from nondiscretionary

fee‐based services that they provide to their customers and from the physical optimization of

their assets. Their fee‐based services have increased due primarily to new supply connections;

expansion of existing connections; and the completion of capital projects, including the Bakken

NGL Pipeline and the West Texas LPG acquisition. However, NGL storage revenue may be affected

by price volatility and forward pricing of NGL physical contracts versus the price of NGLs on the

spot market. We’ve kept a conservative margin of safety with our revenue growth expectation.

Gross Margin: We observed in OKS’s past that gross margin has been pretty stable. We believe

this trend will continue into the future and the gross margin will not fluctuate too much from the

mean, this is why we kept it at a 16% average.

Operating Margin: From 2010 to 2014 OKS’s operating margin has stayed within a 6.5% to 9.4%

range. We believe that the historical average of 8.2% is sufficient in our forecasting of operating

margin.

Net Margin: As you can see, OKS’s net margin has stayed within a tight range with minimal

movement in either direction. We expect Net Margin to fluctuate very little based off of the

historical performance, which is why we left it at 5.1%.

Common Shares Growth: There was no indication in the 10‐K that OKS will aggressively sell or

buy‐back shares so we kept it at the historical average 5.3%.

Dividend Growth: OKS’s 10‐K reported a 14% increase in expected dividend growth in 2015,

dividends declared compared with 2014. Projected 2.25‐cent‐per‐share‐per‐quarter increase for

2015.The 10‐K also reported a 12% to 15% expected average annual dividend growth between

2014 and 2017.

Cash and equivalents: We have forecasted cash and equivalents to slightly increase based on

their investments beginning to generate money. Therefore, we have raised cash and equivalents

from 0.1% to a perpetual growth rate of 1.5%.

Total Receivables: Based off of the 10‐K we do not foresee any increase or decrease in total

receivables and based off of the historical trend only 2014 has been an outlier. Following the

same rates other than 2014, we believe that total receivables will remain around the historical

average of 8.4%

Inventory: Since OKS is an energy company it requires minimum inventory so any fluctuations

will be small and not really affect the average. As you can see from 2010 to 2014 that inventory

has only dropped 2.1% overall. We expect inventory to remain close to the historical average of

2.3%.

Total Current Assets: OKS has shown no nominal expectations to increase or decrease its total

current assets, so we left it at its historical average of 13.4%

Net PPE: OKS has currently invested 500 Million into its Texas pipeline. For this reason we have

increased Net PPE in 2015 to 100%, and as more of its other pipelines and assets become

operational we see Net PPE to stay around a long term rate of 105%.

Total Assets: In unison with Net PPE, we’ve increased total assets to 125% in 2015. We expect

total assets to briefly increase then level off until 2019 as OKS’s pipeline investments come online.

This is why we a long term rate of 130%.

Payables and Accruals: There was an overall fluctuation of 2.0% from 2010 to 2014. This small

movement within a 5 year period shows that payables and accruals are stable and we do not

expect any major jumps from the historical average. This is why we left it at 10.3%.

Total Current Liabilities: We forecast that OKS will begin decreasing its total current liabilities

starting in 2015 at 21% then leveling off at 11% in 2019.This trend is shows what will happen

when OKS starts to pay back its short term debt.

Total Debt: We expect OKS to decrease its total debt starting in 2015. Beginning at 66% in 2015

and dropping to 55% in 2019. OKS’s total debt will continue decrease as revenue begins to pick

up. OKS’s 10‐K indicates that revenue will increase in 2015/2016 which correlates well with the

expected drop in total debt.

Total Equity: We bumped up total equity to 50% based off of OKS retiring some of its current

debt and the forecasted increase of revenue in the near future.

Weighted Average Cost of Capital

When calculating OKS’s cost of capital, we decided to use a risk free rate of 1.895%, which is

based on the most recent 10‐Year yield of U.S. Treasury Bonds. The 5‐Year beta of 0.29 was lower

than the 2‐Year beta of 0.82 so we modified our beta to 0.50 for a more realistic modeling

assumption. We set the market risk premium to 6.0% based off current market conditions. We

also used a conservative 2.0% long‐term growth rate to stress the model. Using information from

OKS’s most recent 10‐K report we calculated the cost of debt to be 4.0%, and cost of equity to be

4.895%. This leaves us with a low WACC of 4.492%.

Free Cash Flow Valuation

As you can see from the FCF valuation model, OKS has a current expected undervaluation of

$36.89 in 2015. Bear in mind this FCF analysis is based on extremely conservative estimates, so

hypothetically this the minimum undervaluation. Also, notice that OKS has consistently been

undervalued since 2009, but this could be a characteristic of this particular sector.

Dividend Discount Model Valuation

As per the DDM above, OKS is currently undervalued by $118.11, which is an undervaluation of

74%. This relatively high undervaluation even includes a more conservative 0.50 alternative beta

and not the 0.29 5‐Year beta. This stresses the model and allows for a better understanding of

how this model shapes up. As you can see the Dividend Yield is a favorable 7.7% with a low

required return of 4.9%. When OKS was compared to other companies in the sector, OKS

currently has the best risk adjusted returns.

OKS. Datasource: CapitalIQ Income Statement Forecast, Page 1 of 1 Copyright Robert A. Weigand, Ph.D., 2013

OKS ONEOK Partners, L.P. Sector Energy2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average Manual 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Total Revenue 6,474 8,676 11,323 10,182 11,869 12,192 13.5% N/A 12,435 12,684 13,192 13,719 13,994Cost of Goods Sold 5,355 7,531 9,745 8,540 10,222 10,089

Gross Profit 1,119 1,145 1,577 1,642 1,647 2,103 14.9% 16.0% 1,990 2,029 2,111 2,195 2,239SG&A Expense 362 363 414 433 465 599R&D Expense 0 0 0 0 0 0Dep. & Amort. 164 174 178 203 237 291Other Oper. Exp. 5,931 8,108 10,382 9,226 10,980 11,049

Operating Income 544 568 940 956 889 1,142 8.2% N/A 1,022 1,043 1,084 1,128 1,150Interest Expense (206) (204) (223) (206) (237) (282)Other Non-Oper. Exp. 107 106 127 142 151 57

EBT ex-Unusuals 445 470 844 892 803 917

Total Unusual Exp. 3 19 (1) 7 12 7Earnings Before Tax 448 488 843 899 815 924

Income Tax Expense 13 15 13 10 11 13Net Income 338 355 682 660 528 566 5.1% N/A 639 652 678 705 719

Basic EPS 1.80 1.75 3.35 3.04 2.35 2.33 2.49 2.41 2.38 2.35 2.28Total Common Shares 188 203 204 217 225 243 5.3% N/A 256 270 284 300 316Dividends Per Share 2.18 2.25 2.37 2.69 2.89 3.07 7.1% N/A 3.16 3.19 3.23 3.29 3.39

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average Manual 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

1. Revenue Growth 34.0% 30.5% -10.1% 16.6% 2.7% 13.5% 2.0% 2.0% 4.0% 4.0% 2.0%2. Gross Margin 13.2% 13.9% 16.1% 13.9% 17.3% 14.9% 16.0%3. Operating Margin 6.5% 8.3% 9.4% 7.5% 9.4% 8.2%4. Net Margin 4.1% 6.0% 6.5% 4.4% 4.6% 5.1%5. Common Shares Growth 8.1% 0.5% 6.5% 3.5% 8.3% 5.3%6. Dividend Growth 3.4% 5.1% 13.7% 7.4% 6.2% 7.1% 3.0% 1.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0%

4. Net Income 5. Total Common Shares 6. Dividends Per Share

Historical Growth and Margins Forecast Defaults to Historical Avg. User Can Enter 1 Manual Avg. or Year-by-Year Values

1. Total Revenue 2. Gross Profit 3. Operating Income

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$0$200$400$600$800

$1,000$1,200

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$0.00

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

0

100

200

300

400

OKS. Datasource: CapitalIQ Balance Sheet Forecast, Page 1 of 2 Copyright Robert A. Weigand, Ph.D., 2013

OKS ONEOK Partners, L.P. Sector EnergyASSETS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average Manual 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Cash and Equivalents 3 1 35 537 135 43 1.4% N/A 12 63 132 137 210Short-Term Investments 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Cash & ST Invest. 3 1 35 537 135 43

Total Receivables 657 820 926 930 1,112 744 8.4% N/A 1,051 1,072 1,115 1,159 1,182Inventory 218 317 202 236 242 190 2.3% N/A 282 288 300 312 318Prepaid Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Current Assets 1,102 1,279 1,306 1,892 1,583 1,086 13.4% N/A 1,669 1,702 1,770 1,841 1,878

Gross PPE 6,354 5,857 6,964 8,585 10,755 13,378Accumulated Depr. (972) (1,100) (1,260) (1,441) (1,653) (1,842)

Net PPE 5,381 4,757 5,704 7,144 9,102 11,536 69.3% 105.0% 12,435 13,318 13,851 14,405 14,693

Long-Term Investments 765 1,188 1,223 1,221 1,230 1,133Goodwill 397 397 397 397 489 489

Total Assets 7,953 7,920 8,947 10,959 12,863 14,635 101.3% 130.0% 15,544 16,489 17,149 17,835 18,192

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 694 882 1,090 1,210 1,396 1,003Accounts Payable 694 852 1,049 1,058 1,303 911 Note: Forecasting Payables + Accruals together in row 19 belowAccrued Expenses 0 30 41 152 93 92 10.3% N/A 1,285 1,311 1,363 1,418 1,446Short-Term Debt 523 430 0 0 0 1,055

Total Current Liabilities 2,047 1,974 1,889 1,570 1,706 2,336 17.7% N/A 2,611 2,537 2,243 1,921 1,539

Long-Term Debt 2,822 2,582 3,516 4,804 6,045 6,038 44.4% N/A 8,207 8,372 8,311 8,232 7,696Pension Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,345 3,011 3,516 4,804 6,045 7,094

Total Liabilities 4,943 4,643 5,500 6,496 7,864 8,516 Note: Forecasting ST Debt + LT Debt together in row 22 above

Preferred Equity 0 0 0 0 0 0Common Stock & APIC 2,942 3,171 3,386 4,406 4,882 5,831Retained Earnings 0 0 0 0 0 0Treasury Stock 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Common Equity 2,920 3,177 3,334 4,306 4,824 5,739

Total Equity 3,010 3,277 3,447 4,464 4,999 6,119 40.9% 50.0% 6,218 6,342 6,596 6,860 6,997Total Liab. and Equity 7,953 7,920 8,947 10,959 12,863 14,635

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average Manual 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E1. Cash and Equivalents 0.0% 0.3% 5.3% 1.1% 0.3% 1.4% 0.1% 0.5% 1.0% 1.0% 1.5%2. Total Receivables 9.5% 8.2% 9.1% 9.4% 6.1% 8.4%3. Inventory 3.7% 1.8% 2.3% 2.0% 1.6% 2.3%

Percent of Sales Forecast Defaults to Historical Avg. User Can Enter 1 Manual Avg. or Year-by-Year Values

2. Total Receivables1. Cash and Equivalents 3. Inventory

$0$100$200$300$400$500$600

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

OKS. Datasource: CapitalIQ Balance Sheet Forecast, Page 2 of 2 Copyright Robert A. Weigand, Ph.D., 2013

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average Manual 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E4. Total Current Assets 14.7% 11.5% 18.6% 13.3% 8.9% 13.4%5. Net PPE 54.8% 50.4% 70.2% 76.7% 94.6% 69.3% 105.0% 100.0%6. Total Assets 91.3% 79.0% 107.6% 108.4% 120.0% 101.3% 130.0% 125.0%7. Payables and Accruals 10.2% 9.6% 11.9% 11.8% 8.2% 10.3%8. Total Current Liabilities 22.8% 16.7% 15.4% 14.4% 19.2% 17.7% 21.0% 20.0% 17.0% 14.0% 11.0%9. Total Debt 34.7% 31.0% 47.2% 50.9% 58.2% 44.4% 66.0% 66.0% 63.0% 60.0% 55.0%10. Total Equity 37.8% 30.4% 43.8% 42.1% 50.2% 40.9% 50.0%

7. Payables and Accruals 8. Total Current Liabilities 9. Total Debt

10. Total Equity

4. Total Current Assets 5. Net PPE 6. Total Assets

Percent of Sales Forecast Defaults to Historical Avg. User Can Enter 1 Manual Avg. or Year-by-Year Values

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$0$500

$1,000$1,500$2,000$2,500$3,000

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

OKS. Datasource: CapitalIQ Financial Analysis & Valuation, Page 1 of 5 Copyright Robert A. Weigand, Ph.D., 2013

OKS ONEOK Partners, L.P. Sector Energy Report Date 5/8/2015 2009

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Total Revenue 6,474 8,676 11,323 10,182 11,869 12,192 12,435 12,684 13,192 13,719 13,994Gross Profit 1,119 1,145 1,577 1,642 1,647 2,103 1,990 2,029 2,111 2,195 2,239Operating Income 544 568 940 956 889 1,142 1,022 1,043 1,084 1,128 1,150Net Income 338 355 682 660 528 566 639 652 678 705 719Retained Earnings 0 0 0 0 0 0 (171) (382) (621) (902) (1,252)Total Common Shares 188 203 204 217 225 243 256 270 284 300 316Total Diluted Shares 188 203 204 217 225 243 256 270 284 300 316Earnings Per Share $1.80 $1.75 $3.35 $3.04 $2.35 $2.33 $2.49 $2.41 $2.38 $2.35 $2.28Dividends Per Share $2.18 $2.25 $2.37 $2.69 $2.89 $3.07 $3.16 $3.19 $3.23 $3.29 $3.39

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Cash and Equivalents 3 1 35 537 135 43 12 63 132 137 210Total Receivables 657 820 926 930 1,112 744 1,051 1,072 1,115 1,159 1,182Inventory 218 317 202 236 242 190 282 288 300 312 318Total Current Assets 1,102 1,279 1,306 1,892 1,583 1,086 1,669 1,702 1,770 1,841 1,878Net PPE 5,381 4,757 5,704 7,144 9,102 11,536 12,435 13,318 13,851 14,405 14,693Total Assets 7,953 7,920 8,947 10,959 12,863 14,635 15,544 16,489 17,149 17,835 18,192Payables and Accruals 694 882 1,090 1,210 1,396 1,003 1,285 1,311 1,363 1,418 1,446Total Current Liabilities 2,047 1,974 1,889 1,570 1,706 2,336 2,611 2,537 2,243 1,921 1,539Total Debt 3,345 3,011 3,516 4,804 6,045 7,094 8,207 8,372 8,311 8,232 7,696Total Equity 3,010 3,277 3,447 4,464 4,999 6,119 6,218 6,342 6,596 6,860 6,997

Historical Income Statement Highlights Forecasted Income Statement Highlights

Historical Balance Sheet Highlights Forecasted Balance Sheet Highlights

$0$2,000$4,000$6,000$8,000

$10,000$12,000$14,000$16,000

Total Revenue

$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800

Net Income

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000Total Current Assets Cash and Equivalents

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008,0009,000

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008,000

Total Equity Total Debt

$0.00$0.50$1.00$1.50$2.00$2.50$3.00$3.50$4.00

Earnings Per Share Dividends Per Share

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000Total Assets Net PPE


Margins 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Gross Profit Margin 17.3% 13.2% 13.9% 16.1% 13.9% 17.3% 16.0% 16.0% 16.0% 16.0% 16.0%Operating Profit Margin 8.4% 6.5% 8.3% 9.4% 7.5% 9.4% 8.2% 8.2% 8.2% 8.2% 8.2%Net Profit Margin 5.2% 4.1% 6.0% 6.5% 4.4% 4.6% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1%Free Cash Flow Margin 0.0% 12.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.7% 3.5% 4.0% 5.5%

Liquidity and Debt 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Days Sales Outstanding 37.04 34.51 29.86 33.34 34.21 22.29 30.84 30.84 30.84 30.84 30.84Inventory Turnover 29.76 27.36 56.00 43.17 48.97 64.18 44.02 44.02 44.02 44.02 44.02Total Debt to Equity 111.1% 91.9% 102.0% 107.6% 120.9% 115.9% 132.0% 132.0% 126.0% 120.0% 110.0%Total Debt to Assets 42.1% 38.0% 39.3% 43.8% 47.0% 48.5% 52.8% 50.8% 48.5% 46.2% 42.3%

Profitability 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Total Asset Turnover 0.81 1.10 1.27 0.93 0.92 0.83 0.80 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77Equity Multiplier 2.64 2.42 2.60 2.46 2.57 2.39 2.50 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60Return on Assets 4.2% 4.5% 7.6% 6.0% 4.1% 3.9% 4.1% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%Return on Equity 11.2% 10.8% 19.8% 14.8% 10.6% 9.3% 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 10.3% 10.3%Return on Capital 9.5% 11.0% 16.0% 12.4% 9.5% 9.8% 8.1% 7.7% 7.6% 7.6% 7.6%

2.252.302.352.402.452.502.552.602.652.70

0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.4

Total Asset Turnover Equity Multiplier

010203040506070

05

10152025303540

Days Sales Outstanding Inventory Turnover

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%Gross Profit Margin Operating Profit Margin

0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%

Net Profit Margin Free Cash Flow Margin

0%20%40%60%80%

100%120%140%

Total Debt to Equity Total Debt to Assets

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%Return on Equity Return on Assets

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%Return on Equity Return on Capital


Capital, NOPAT & FCF 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

NOWC 183 256 73 493 94 -26 61 113 183 190 264Net Fixed Assets 5,381 4,757 5,704 7,144 9,102 11,536 12,435 13,318 13,851 14,405 14,693Total Invested Capital 5,565 5,014 5,777 7,637 9,196 11,510 12,496 13,431 14,034 14,596 14,957Effective Tax Rate 2.9% 3.1% 1.5% 1.1% 1.3% 1.4%NOPAT 528 550 926 945 877 1,127 1,008 1,028 1,069 1,112 1,134Free Cash Flow N/A 1,101 163 -914 -682 -1,187 22 93 466 551 773NOPAT Per Share 2.82 2.71 4.55 4.35 3.90 4.63 3.93 3.81 3.76 3.71 3.60FCF/Share N/A 5.43 0.80 -4.21 -3.04 -4.88 0.08 0.35 1.64 1.84 2.45Return on Capital 9.5% 11.0% 16.0% 12.4% 9.5% 9.8% 8.1% 7.7% 7.6% 7.6% 7.6%

Intrinsic Value of FCFs Valuation ModelValue Creation 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Economic Value-Added 278 325 667 602 464 610 447 425 439 456 462Market Valued-Added 2,834 4,782 8,322 7,260 6,830 3,523 13,754 14,689 15,416 16,042 17,133PV of Future FCFs 20,532 20,353 21,105 22,967 24,681 26,977 28,167 29,339 30,191 30,996 31,616Value of Non-Oper. Assets 3 1 35 537 135 43 12 63 132 137 210Total Intrinsic Firm Value 20,535 20,354 21,140 23,504 24,815 27,019 28,179 29,402 30,323 31,133 31,826Intrinsic Value of Equity 17,190 17,343 17,624 18,700 18,771 19,925 19,972 21,031 22,012 22,902 24,129Per Share Intrinsic Value $91.62 $85.54 $86.47 $86.12 $83.55 $81.89 $77.93 $77.90 $77.41 $76.46 $76.47 0.14050619Year-End Stock Price $31.15 $39.75 $57.74 $53.99 $52.65 $39.63 $41.04Over (Under) Valuation/Sh ($60.47) ($45.79) ($28.73) ($32.13) ($30.90) ($42.26)% Over (Under) Valued -194.1% -115.2% -49.8% -59.5% -58.7% -106.6%

Cost of Capital 2014 Weight % Cost Wgt CostEquity Capitalization 9,642 57.6% 4.9% 2.8%

Total Debt 7,094 42.4% 4.0% 1.7%Preferred Stock 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Value of All Securities 16,736 100.0%Effective Tax Rate 1.4% Long-Term Growth Rate:Risk-Free Rate 1.895% 2.0%5-Yr Beta 0.288 Alternative Beta:Market Risk Premium 6.00% 0.50CAPM Cost of Equity 4.895%

4.492%

(Tax rate from last historical year used in forecasts)

Weighted Average Cost of Capital:

$0$2,000$4,000$6,000$8,000$10,000$12,000$14,000$16,000$18,000

$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800

Economic Value-Added Market Valued-Added

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

Year-End Stock Price Per Share Intrinsic Value

-250%

-200%

-150%

-100%

-50%

0%

($70)($60)($50)($40)($30)($20)($10)

$0

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Over (Under) Valuation/Sh % Over (Under) Valued

$0$2,000$4,000$6,000$8,000

$10,000$12,000$14,000$16,000

Total Invested Capital Net Fixed Assets

($1,500)

($1,000)

($500)

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500NOPAT Free Cash Flow


Relative Valuation 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Stock Price/Intr. Value $31.15 $39.75 $57.74 $53.99 $52.65 $39.63 $77.93 $77.90 $77.41 $76.46 $76.47Price to Earnings 17.3 22.7 17.2 17.8 22.4 17.0 31.3 32.3 32.5 32.5 33.6Price to Free Cash Flow N/A 7.3 72.2 N/A N/A N/A 924.4 225.2 47.2 41.6 31.2Price to Sales 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.0 0.8 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7Price to Book 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3Earnings Yield 5.8% 4.4% 5.8% 5.6% 4.5% 5.9% 3.2% 3.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.0%Dividend Yield 7.0% 5.7% 4.1% 5.0% 5.5% 7.7% 4.1% 4.1% 4.2% 4.3% 4.4%Free Cash Flow Yield N/A 13.7% 1.4% -7.8% -5.8% -12.3% 0.1% 0.4% 2.1% 2.4% 3.2%

Relative Valuation Pricing Model Adjust 2015E Target Dividend Discount Valuation Model 2015E Ratio Ratio Ratio Metric Price OKS ONEOK Partners, L.P.

Price to Earnings 31.3 18.0 $2.49 $44.87 3.0% 1.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0%Price to Free Cash Flow 924.4 24.0 $0.08 $2.02 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019EPrice to Sales 1.6 $48.52 $77.93 $2.18 $2.25 $2.37 $2.69 $2.89 $3.07 $3.16 $3.19 $3.23 $3.29 $3.39Price to Book 1.3 $60.65 $77.93

1-Yr Div Growth 6.2% PV Dividends 1-4 $11.43 Dividend Yield 7.7%2015E 3-Yr Div Growth 9.1% PV Perpetual Div. $147.72

Current Price $41.04 5-Yr Div Growth 7.1% Intrinsic Value $159.15 If Purchased For: $41.04PV of Free Cash Flows $77.93 Risk-Free Rate 1.90% Current Price $41.04 Expected Return = 47.6% 44.48%Dividend Discount Model $159.15 5-Yr Beta 0.29 ($41.04) $3.16 $3.19 $3.23 $182.12 $178.83Price to Earnings $44.87 Market Premium 6.0% Analyst Notes:Price to Free Cash Flow $2.02 Required Return 4.9% Based on a current dividend of $3.07, expected growth as shown above and an equity requiredPrice to Sales $77.93 Alternative Beta 0.50 return of 4.9%, OKS is worth $159.15 per share, vs. a current price of $41.04.Price to Book $77.93

Compared With: Compared With:

Williams Companies, Inc. S&P 500 Index

Kinder Morgan, Inc.

Expected Dividend Growth Rates

Estimated Target Prices vs.

May 8, 2015Annual Dividend

0

200

400

600

800

1,000Price to Earnings Price to Free Cash Flow

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0Price to Sales Price to Book

0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%

Earnings Yield Dividend Yield

$0$20$40$60$80

$100$120$140$160$180

Current Price PV of FreeCash Flows

DividendDiscount

Model

Price toEarnings

Price to FreeCash Flow

Price to SalesPrice to Book

Estimated Target Prices vs. Current Price

-30%-20%-10%

0%10%20%30%40%50%

OKS WMB KMI

-30%-25%-20%-15%-10%

-5%0%5%

10%15%20%

OKS ^SPX


Piotroski Financial Fitness Scorecard (10-point scale) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Positive Net Income 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Positive Free Cash Flow 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1Growing ROA (% change NI > % change TA) 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0Earnings Quality (Operating Income > Net Income) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Total Assets Growing Faster Than Total Liabilities 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1Increasing Liquidity (Current Ratio) 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1% Change Shares Outstanding (Diluted) < +2.0% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Expanding Gross Margin 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0Asset Turnover (% change sales > % change assets) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Liabilities to Operating Cash Flow (EBIT) < 4.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Piotroski Score 8 9 6 3 4 6 6 6 6 6

Altman Probability of Bankruptcy Z-Score Weight 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

(Current Assets-Current Liabilities)/Total Assets 1.200 -0.1054 -0.0782 0.0352 -0.0115 -0.1025 -0.0728 -0.0607 -0.0331 -0.0054 0.0223Retained Earnings/Total Assets 1.400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0146 -0.0312 -0.0488 -0.0694Earnings Before Interest & Tax/Total Assets 3.300 0.2365 0.3469 0.2879 0.2280 0.2576 0.2170 0.2086 0.2086 0.2086 0.2086Market Value Equity/Total Liabilities 0.600 1.0414 1.2838 1.0828 0.9025 0.6794 1.2848 1.2435 1.2515 1.2520 1.2932Sales/Total Assets 0.999 1.0943 1.2643 0.9282 0.9219 0.8322 0.7992 0.7685 0.7685 0.7685 0.7685Altman Score 2.27 2.82 2.33 2.04 1.67 2.23 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.22

The interpretation for the Altman Score is: Safe Zone = Z > 2.9, Grey Zone = 1.23 < Z < 2.9, Distress Zone = Z < 1.23

0

2

4

6

8

10

Piotroski Financial Fitness Scorecard (10-pt scale)

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

Altman Probability of Bankruptcy Z-Score

analysts: christopher carson, mark latimer, applied ... · balance sheet. financial dashboard...

Documents