anti satellite weapons: a likely future trajectory...higher range missiles were introduced taking...

Anti Satellite Weapons: A Likely

Future Trajectory

Lt Gen (Dr) Vijay Kumar Saxena (Retd), PVSM, AVSM, VSM

Occasional Paper – May 2016

Anti Satellite Weapons: A Likely Future Trajectory 2 of 17

http://www.vifindia.org © Vivekananda International Foundation

About the Author

Lt Gen (Dr) Vijay Kumar Saxena (Retd), PVSM, AVSM, VSM

Lt Gen Saxena is a former Director General of the Corps Army Air

Defence. The officer, as a Scholar Warrior, is a distinguished member

of the country’s strategic community, and is a prolific writer on

military subjects. He has authored 5 Books, two on Air Defence, two on

United Nations and one on Combat Leadership.

The General is regularly published in a host of Professional Magazines

and Journals, month-on-month. He has to his credit, some 85 Articles

on a wide spectrum of subjects and counting. Besides the kernel of Air

Defence as his core competency, the General has developed alternative

writing verticals on Space subjects, the Unmanned and a special

expertise in the Defence Procurement Procedures. Off late the General

has also started appearing on TV shows carrying programmes related

to his domain of expertise.

Gen Saxena, holds a Doctorate with his thesis on the ‘Future of the

United Nations in the 21st Century’. Besides this, he is a NLSIU scholar

with qualifications in Human Rights and Child Rights Law.

Immediately post his colour Service in Jun 15, the General is RE-

ATTIRED and is serving the cause of Services as an Advisor Army to a

leading DPSU of the country

http://www.vifindia.org/



Anti Satellite Weapons: A Likely

Future Trajectory

Anti Satellite Weapons (ASAT) weapons, as the name goes, are the

space weapons that are capable of destroying space assets of the

opponent for the purpose as may be intended by the attacker. My case

in this piece to flag the point, that such class of weapons, in the hands

of the leading space faring nations are growing at a feverish pace. And

the irony is that the current body of legalese in the form of Space Laws

are incapable and/or impotent in checking the menacing upward

growth of such weapons. If we continue at today's unforgiving pace, it

will not be an act of fancy to imagine a war of adversaries in the space

out to destroy each other and one another's satellites (and collaterals,

sic) and thus crippling a whole mankind for what they depend so

hugely on today. A world unimaginable without communications,

smart phones, navigation, internet, GPS, global connect, planetary data

share and more, may be closer to reality than one thought.

ASATs have not suddenly appeared from The Mother of ASATs:

nowhere; the concept of ASAT weapons has evolved over time as a

logical progression from the mother concept of Anti Ballistic Missiles

(ABM) or its more recent coinage, the Ballistic Missile defence (BMD) -

a Missile-based defence against the adversary's threat of Ballistic

Missiles. How and when the BMD ushered in the ASAT, is an interesting

metamorphosis

Along the tide and time, three specific eras are The Three Era.

detectable in coming of age of the ASATs through the BMD kernel.

● The first era belongs to 1950s and 60s, when, in the midst of the Cold

War fever, the then two space faring Nations, i.e. the US and erstwhile

Soviet Union, thought of countering the adversary's ballistic missiles

by putting nuclear tipped interceptors atop their ICBMs. Those were

the exciting times of the 'show of mighty force'. One heard of the US

Spartan, Nike, Sprint, and Sentinel while the Soviet counter power

was carried on the likes of Griffin, Galosh. Gazelle and Gorgon ICBMs

● The impracticality of exploding huge nuclear warheads in space for

the cause of BMD, the danger of collateral spread of catastrophic

radiations and the sheer inaccuracy of nuclear tipped monsters in

killing something as precise as an incoming ballistic missile (probably




only a residual stage or a warhead section), actually caused the death

to the idea and the practice of nuclear-tipped monsters as BMD

arsenal.

● This NO GO scenario ushered the next era of non-nuclear hit-to-kill

interceptors based on Kinetic kill. Somewhere around this time in Mar

1983, came the bright idea of Strategic defence Initiative (SDI).It

promised the next level of technology to kill the adversary’s incoming

ballistic missiles. One heard of the grandiose plans to deploy high-

powered lasers, orbiting X ray lasers, particle beam weapons and

'brilliant weapons'.

President Bill Clinton, later finding the SDI unrealistic and carrying the

danger of destabilising the Strategic Offensive Doctrine based on

Mutually Assured Destruction dissolved it and set pace for its

successor organisation, called the BMDO (Ballistic Missile Defence

Organisation). BMDO aimed to put in place, a missile defence regime

based on the concept of layered-and-tiered deployment. In this,

weapons were fielded for different layers of altitude, viz Lower

Tier/Upper Tier and Strategic Tier. Cumulatively, these systems aimed

to take on the incoming ballistic missiles of the adversary in various

stages of their incoming flight from the boost to mid-course to the

terminal phase. We are in these current exciting times when the

science and technology is trying to inch forward to take on multiple

challenges to kill the adversary’s incoming missiles as early as possible

(post launch) in their journey to their targeted destinations. Some of

these challenges include the boost phase interception/ taking on

MIRVs prior to re-entry/ linking up space based surveillance assets

with ground and air based sensors/ placing soft powered interceptors

in space for ready kill of incoming missile threats, et al.

Actually ASATs as a concept, never made any dramatic Enter ASAT.

(never before) entry in the above BMD growth cycle. ASAT as an idea,

grew alongside BMD and initially manifested as BMD systems taking on

satellites instead of incoming missiles. Initial systems were based on

kinetic kill, later on other more technologically enabled avatars of

ASATs appeared. The ones based on laser or particle beam weapons or

as micro satellites capable of co-orbital killings. This threatening trend

of ASAT development is growing menacingly with China in the

forefront. That is the issue.




A Snapshot on ASAT Weapons1,2

Without clogging the main argument with avoidable factuals, here is a

snapshot of ASAT weapons in the hands of the leading space faring

nations.

US has been through it all and cutting edge research continues: USA.

ASAT development started in fifties (1958-59) with the nuclear tipped

Air Launched Ballistic Missiles (ALBMs) atop strategic bombers

(initially B 47 later B 58). The weapon was tested on the American

satellite Explorer VI. The Interceptor passed 6.4 Km of the satellite. A

huge success.

In early sixties, a Direct ascent interceptor was developed. It used a

ground ballistic missile tipped with a nuclear warhead (Programme

505). It was tested in early sixties, several times. The weapon could

successfully intercept a designated point in space at 100 miles. Later,

higher range missiles were introduced taking the capability to target

satellites as high as, 1300 km (Programme 437).3

In eighties, an F 15 aircraft was used to launch AGM 69 Short Range Air

to Surface Missile as a launch vehicle that carried a Miniature Vehicle

(MV) as the payload (ASM 135 ASAT). The MV used an IR sensor to

home on the target satellite. Taken through five tests, the weapon

destroyed a US P-78-1 spectroscopy satellite at 285 km.

In 2008, Aegis Missile system employing a ship-fired RIM 161 Standard

Missile 3 was used to destroy a US spy satellite USA 193 at an altitude

of 247 km.

The higher versions of the Aegis missile system having the range

capability between 1450-2350 Km are under development. This

capability will virtually encompass all the operational satellites in Low

Earth Orbit (LEO) that includes 100 Chinese and Russian Satellites. The

system was to start testing in 2015 and was to be operational in 2018.

1 http:// www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/anti-satellite weapon 2 https://www.thespacereview.com.article.through-a-glass-darkly-chinese-american-and Russian-anti-satellite-testing-in-space;Page1,page2,Page3 3 https://www.forum.nasaspaceflight.com>Anti-Sat Weapons (Programme 437 (US Nuclear ASAT system


http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/anti-satellite

https://www.thespacereview.com.article.through-a-glass-darkly-chinese-american-and/

https://www.thespacereview.com.article.through-a-glass-darkly-chinese-american-and/



Apart from hard kill, US is known to have the capability of soft kill

(Counter Communication Systems) having a capability to interfere with

adversary's use of a satellite (Jamming/ Radio frequency interference

techniques et al).

Soviet Union/Russia:

Unlike the US, Russia and China preferred a co-orbital ASAT weapons.

The first system in this category (Istrebitel Sputnikov or fighter

satellite consisted of a kill vehicle and a launch vehicle based on an

ICBM (R 36). After being placed in the orbit, the kill vehicle would

manoeuvre to intercept the target satellite and detonate on-board

explosives. It was tested successfully several times in sixties, seventies

and eighties on Cosmos series of satellites. Over time, targeting

altitudes were increased (up to 2000 km) and reaction times to sync

with the target satellite were reduced (number of orbits required by

the ASAT to home on to their target).

As years rolled, another rocket based hit-to-kill system (Naryad

System) with a capability to go up to tremendously high altitudes

(40,000 kms) as an upper stage of a satellite vehicle was developed.

Once in orbit, the rocket system had the capability to independently

manoeuvre and home in on multiple target satellites before exploding.

In response to the US ASM 135, Russians developed a direct ascent

ASAT system (Kontakt System) using a Mig 31 D fighter mated with a

33 ft long interceptor (it reached a maximum altitude of 1500 km into

space). Accurate tracking of target satellite was ensured by a ground

based laser optical locator. This ASAT was capable of destroying up to

36 satellites in less than 24 hours.

Open sources reported the testing of the new Russian ASAT missile

called Nudol on 18 Nov 2015. Nudol is a direct ascent missile system

with a capability to take on target satellites in kinetic kill mode.

Reportedly, Nodol may be a part of Project Samolet - M , a project to

upgrade the Moscow missile defence.

Russia's 2010 Military Doctrine emphasises space as a crucial

component of its defence strategy which gives high priority to conduct

of ASAT research and employment of satellite jammers.Russian

President has stated in open media that Russia is following China in




building state-of-the-art-weapons that would guarantee the fulfilment

of space defence tasks for the period until 2020.4,5

China.6

Open sources report that among the various space faring nations, China

is developing its ASAT capability at the most feverish pace. Reportedly,

Chinese ASAT weapons are under development ever since 1964

(Programme 640). The initial aim was to develop an ABM missile but

around 1970, it started an ASAT programme.

Three types of ASAT systems are under development, namely, Direct

Ascent Systems, Soft Kill Systems and Micro satellites.

Direct Ascent Systems feature a land-based missile that is directed

against the target satellite as a kinetic kill vehicle. The launch of SC 19

Missile on 11 Jan 2007 to kill the ageing FY -1C polar orbit satellite of

the Fengyun Series was the apt demonstration of this capability.

Though the above was a land-based launch, open sources report of a

similar capability having been created to launch SC 19 class of missiles

from Lin class of submarines. That 2007 ASAT test has been classified

as the highest man-made debris generation event in the history so far,

is another huge concern.

Another SC 19 Missile destroyed an MRBM (CSS-X-11) in 2010. Though

the act was of ABM defence, it was also seen as a reinforcement of the

ASAT capability demonstrated in 2007.

In the soft kill capability, China is reportedly developing high power

laser and microwave weapons that can either disrupt or electrically

damage a satellite. One such high power laser is under development

since 1995 and was tested on an orbiting US satellite 2006.

In 2008, the two astronauts on board Shenzhou 7 reportedly released a

microsatellite that flew at a relative speed of 17000 mph and passed

dangerously close (27 Km) to the International Space Station (ISS). At

such relative speeds, a possible collision could have destroyed both the

objects.

4 http://www.nationalsecurity.news/russia-now-testing-anti-satellite-weapon.

5 http://www.natonalinterest.org/get-ready-america-russian-and-chinese-have-space-weapons. 6 https://www.en.m.wikipedia.org>wiki> asat-program-of-china


http://www.natonalinterest.org/get-ready-america-russian-and-chinese-have-space-

http://www.natonalinterest.org/get-ready-america-russian-and-chinese-have-space-



In May 2013, the Dong Neng 2 (DN -2) ASAT interceptor test kicked up

quite a storm in expert circles of space-faring nations. It launched an

object on a high sub-orbital altitude more than 18600 miles. While

China claimed it to be scientific payload to study the upper ionosphere,

analyst described it as a ASAT system with a capability to enter deep

space and threaten target satellites across the entire altitude bracket of

geo-centric orbits (Low Earth Orbits or LEO - up to 2000 km, Medium

Earth Orbits or MEO - 2000 km to 35786 Km and High Earth Orbits or

HEO - higher than 35.786 Km). Mystery still surrounds this test.

According to a 2015 Report by the US-China Economic and Security

Review Commission, PLA assesses that US satellites are critical to the

country's ability to sustain operations globally. Destroying or capturing

satellites and other sensors will deprive the opponent, the initiative on

the battlefield and will make it difficult for them to bring their

precision-guided munitions into full play.

Open sources reported that above was followed in Oct 15, with another

test of an Exo-atmospheric vehicle (DN-3) based on the principle of

catastrophic kinetic kill. The Report of Chinese building space warfare

arsenal at a fast pace have been rife all along in the early months of

2016.

India.7

Open sources have gone this far as to talk about the ASAT capability of

India? Mercifully, the expert opinion is stopping at the capability and

not any further. Intentions could be any.

Mention is being made of 5000 km Agni V that travelled up to 600 kms

in space during its last parabolic trajectory. This capability is being

mated with the kinetic kill vehicle of the Indian BMD Programme

(Programme AD) to produce an Exo-atmospheric kill system.

Normally an ASAT weapon is to reach about 800 km into space. The

current capability can be easily enhanced since that will be a function

of propulsion boost only.

7 https://www.ibcworldnews.com>indian-defence’s-new-target:Anti-Satellite-Weapons




I will stop this here without any comments. Let open sources keep the

ambiguity alive - capability/possibility/intention?

Factuals as above, actually, mean only a pot-The So-What Question.

pouri collection of data unless it leads to the big picture. The answer to

the ‘So What question’. Towards this, I present the following :-

● What is the emerging position?

● Are the ASAT tests legal? If not, can the proliferation of ASAT be

controlled?

● The Bottom-line

Emerging Position.

Where is the doubt that that the ASAT idea was born with the dawn of

space age itself. Its precursor was the ABM defence. ABM/BMD to ASAT

is a smooth/seamless and logical transition.For a brief time period at

the height of Cold War, when the national space systems of the main

players became an increasingly important part of the National

Technical Means of Verification (NTMV) for various Arms Control

Agreements, the interest in ASAT weaned, but with the demise of Cold

War, the pace picked up tremendously.

It is an open secret that all the leading space-faring nations are actively

pursuing counter-space capabilities which broadly include Direct

Ascent Anti Satellite Missiles, Co-orbital Anti Satellite Systems,

Computer Network Operations, Ground Based Satellite Jammers, and

Directed Energy weapons.

If we go by the open source, then China seems to be leading the ASAT

race with Russia in a close tow. These are capable of directly

threatening the US space lifeline in any future conflict.Though many a

lamenting voices are being heard on US strategic vulnerabilities, on

how the Congressional cuts in space funding is putting US at a strategic

disadvantage, this analyst believes that no one is any less. If you nearly

control the global open source, you tell less about you than others.

However, a discerning mind knows that there is more than what meets

the eye. I say this in context of US though some of their SOS cries are

viable.




The technology revamping up the ABM capability from the terminal to

mid-course interception has come as a shot in the arm for the ASAT

capability that has got a quantum range-altitude boost, especially in the

category of hit-to-kill ASAT weapons. In fact, all midcourse Ballistic

systems have inherent ASAT capabilities.

There has been a self-defeating effort on the part of US to create a

duality between the midcourse BMD systems (say SM 3) and the direct

ascent Kinetic energy interceptors (like the Chinese SC 19). By calling

the former as low-altitude direct ascent interceptor and the later, as

kinetic energy weapon . It is like calling the Peter, Pam when both are

same. The typical Mine OK yours Not OK syndrome. It doesn't really

carry.

The race to acquire ASAT capability is going on unabated. One nation

setting a challenging pace and putting the others in a vicious merry-go-

round.

Are ASATs legal?

Before seeing the legality, let me put the weaponisation and

militarisation argument to rest. How does it sound when I say that with

all the humdrum at the global level of using the outer space - the

‘province of mankind’ for ‘peaceful purposes’, the same, technically

speaking, long stands weaponised, what to talk of its militarisation,

that happened ab-initio. That is the truth, as I will unfold in technical

terms in due course.

Moreover, putting legality aside, the ASAT tests of the leading space-

faring Nations are going unhindered- Chinese ASAT test in January

2007, 2008, 2013, 2016...US ASAT tests 2008, 2010.. Russians ASAT

tests 2010, 2014 ,2015.... The world is crying hoarse over the debris

issue causing an EXISTENTIAL THREAT to the common asset of the

humanity on which the entire Planet has come to depend LIKE NEVER

BEFORE .... Who cares?

Why it is happening unabated? Why nobody Why? The Big Question.

can crack a whip. Sample this commentary:-




The OST, 1967 or more formally, ‘The Treaty or Principles Governing

the Activities of States in Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including

Moon and Other Celestial Bodies’, not only forms the basis for

International Space Laws, but also, has the widest acceptability in the

world community (as of Sep 2015, 104 countries are a party to the

treaty, another 24 have signed but not completed the ratification).8

In its essence, the OST lays down (only relevant portions quoted) the

following:-

It bars the States Parties from placing nuclear weapons or any other

weapons of mass destruction in the orbit of earth, installing them on

Moon or any other celestial body or to otherwise station them in

space9.

It exclusively limits the use of Moon and other celestial bodies to

peaceful purposes and explicitly prohibits their use for testing of

weapons of any kind, conducting military manoeuvres or establishing

military bases, installations and fortifications.

It forbids any government from claiming a celestial resource such as

Moon or a planet. It forbids natural opportunities of outer space,

including Moon and other celestial bodies.

A State Party to the Treaty which has reasons to believe that any

activity or an experiment planned by other State Party in outer space

including the Moon and other celestial bodies, would cause potentially

‘harmful interference’ with activities on peaceful exploration of outer

space including the Moon and other celestial bodies may ‘request

consultation’ concerning the activity or experiment.

The above provisions have glaring inadequacies. For instance:

● The treaty does not prohibit the development, placement and testing

of conventional weapons in the outer space.

8 https://www.en.m.wikipedia>wiki>outer-space-treaty

9 http://www.State.gov>...>current-treaties-and-agreements




● It does not prohibit a ground based weapon making a direct/ indirect

ascent into outer space and killing an orbital body.

● It also does not prohibit a space based weapon (Kinetic Energy or

Directed Energy) to kill another satellite or orbital target in outer

space or to kill ballistic missiles transiting outer space in the post

boost/re-entry phase.

● By implication, military activities in outer space are allowed unless

specifically prohibited by any Treaty.

● Also, there are glaring definitional inadequacies in the legalese of the

OST. Some examples :-

▪ What constitutes space or a space weapon is not defined.

▪ Accepted demarcation of the boundary between the air space

under national sovereignty and outer space has not been

defined.

▪ What constitutes ‘peaceful use of space’ (by exclusion, what is

not peaceful?) What the US understands it as ‘non aggressive’

while the Russians see it as ‘wholly non-military’ is actually

not specifically accepted/defined.

▪ What constitutes ‘harmful interference’; is shrouded in

ambiguity.

The Treaty, adopted through the UN process, is non-binding and

devoid of any enforcement mechanism. Responsibility towards

discharge is only ‘assumed’.

In fact, under the garb of ‘peaceful use’ and ‘scientific research for

peaceful purposes’, as enshrined in the OST, US, China and Russia have

put a perfectly legal cover over their hectic development of space

technologies capable of military applications.

Judging against the above loopholes, the ASAT tests of China, US and

Russia would appear to be perfectly legal. That is however not the

whole truth as the same could be faulted under Article IX of OST, as

also, under Liability Convention.




This is how Article IX of OST mandates the State Parties to conduct

activities in outer space, including the Moon and other celestial

bodies, with due regard to the corresponding interests of all other State

Parties to the Treaty.

It forbids them from conducting such activities which would cause

‘harmful interference’ with activities of other State.

State Parties are also to avoid harmful contamination and adverse

changes in the environment of the Earth resulting from the

introduction of ‘extra-terrestrial matter’ (in outer space)10.

Let’s talk about one sample case--the Chinese ASAT A Sample Case..

test of 2007 which as I said, has been classified as the highest

manmade debris generation event in the history so far11. Sample this:-

➢ As of September 2010, the US Space Surveillance Network (SSN) has

picked a total of 3037 pieces of debris greater than 10 cms, 97% of

which have remained in the orbit12.

➢ Scientists estimate about 1,50,000 debris particles in altitudes

between 200-4000 kms, 79% of which will remain in orbit for 100

years13.

➢ The debris has spread throughout the entire orbit resulting in a cloud

of debris around earth. This is the largest debris cloud ever generated

by a single event in the orbit.

➢ As of January 2007, there were 2864 active or inactive satellites in

LEO out of which 1899 pass through the region now affected by

Chinese debris.

➢ In April 2011, debris of the Chinese test passed close to the

‘International Space Station14.

10 http/www. Unoosa.org/oosa/space laws/outer spt. html 11Orbital Debris Quarterly News’ Volume 14 Issue 4 Oct 2010. http://www.orbital debris.jse.nasa.gov/news letter/news letters.html. 12Dr Ranjana Kaul, “ Space Security’ Legal Implications p-207 carried in Ed. Ajay Lele, Gunjan Singh, “Space Security and Global Cooperation”, Academic Foundation

New Delhi. 13 Brig Rajat Jairath, “Quest for Space : The Indian Connect”, KW Publishers Pvt Ltd, New Delhi. 14 NASA Monitoring Space Junk near International Space Station CNN Apr 5, 2011.


http://www.orbital/



➢ In January 2013, a Russian nano satellite [Ball Lens in The Space

(BLITS)] was destroyed by the debris15.

The illegality of the Chinese ASAT lays bare The Illegality Continues. not only in the gross violation of Article IX of the OST, but also, a potential threat to the space assets of other State Parties for decades ahead. Similar is the story of US and Russian ASAT tests.

Also, under the Liability Convention 1972 (The Liability Convention.

Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space

Objects), a State Party is responsible for all the objects launched from

its territory into space and is full liable for the damage that may arise

from that object. The damage (done/likely) from the Chinese ASAT

must also therefore rest equally on their shoulders.

While the other space laws like the Other Legalese Also Ambiguous.

Rescue Agreement 1968, the Registration Convention 1975, the Moon

Agreement 1979 and International Space Laws governing

disbursement of finite GEO slots by the International

Telecommunication Union (ITU) are all full of crippling inadequacies,

the space constraints prohibit the author from a detailed commentary

on each one of the above.

Though mentioned in passing earlier, lets revisit the A Revisit.

technicalities in militarisation/weaponisation from the point of view of

a legal argument.

As per the definition, militarization of space simply Militarization.

implies the placement and deployment of weapons and military

technology in the outer space. By this definition, the Space was

militarized ever since the earliest communication satellites were

launched, since that implied the deployment of military communication

technology in the Space. Today, militaries all over the world rely on

satellites for command, control, communication, monitoring, early

warning and navigation with GPS. Peaceful uses of outer space thus

include military uses. This includes even those satellites which are not

15 http://www.the diplomat.com/2013/09/the rise-of-chinese-space-junk/2/


http://www.the/



at all peaceful such as using satellites to divert bombing raids or to

orchestrate a ‘prompt global strike’ with a view to control any situation

or to defeat any adversary across the range of military operations. With

more than 90% of all satellites dedicated to military use, truly speaking

militarisation of outer space occurred with the first satellite16.

Talking of Weaponisation, the same is generally Weaponisation.

understood to mean the placement in orbit of space-based devices that

have a destructive capability. What about millions of pieces of space

debris created by the deliberate acts of the countries (ASAT tests)

which have tremendous destruction capability for the space assets of

other countries? What about the ongoing cutting-edge research on the

‘kinetic kill’ or ‘Directed Energy kill weapons’ placed in space orbits,

ready to take on incoming ballistic missiles in their post-boost phase,

when these missiles are transiting the outer space. These dual use

weapons, taking on a Ballistic Missile could as well take on the space

assets? The bottom line is that the weaponisation of outer space is now

a reality. In fact the same is fast fuelling the global arms race17.

The examination of the above legalities thus brings out the following :-

The current regime of Space Laws have glaring inadequacies, both in

the ambivalence and ambiguities of the legalese, as well as, the non-

specificity of the rules-of-the-road.

Though the ASAT tests by China, US Russia and others have been

executed, these are not only illegal in terms of the OST 1967, but also,

the same have created a near permanent existential threat to the

space assets of other nations.

While militarization of outer space happened with the first satellite

the outer space is fast being weaponised leading to a crippling and

self-defeating arms race in the future18.

16 http://www.reaching critical/ will org/resources/fact-sheets. 17 http://www.globalissues.org>Issues/Articles/militarization and weaponisation of Outer Space. 18 http://www.stratfor.com/the-real-danger-from-space-weapons -feb 2016


http://www.reaching/

http://www.global/



And now the bottom-line:

● TECHNICALLY, THE ASAT TESTS ARE ILLEGAL.

● NOTWITHSTANDING, THESE ARE LIKELY TO CONTINUE UNABATED.

● IN THE COMING YEARS, ASATs ARE POISED TO GROW, CAUGHT IN A DUBIOUS AND SELF-DESTRUCTIVE ARMS RACE.

● AS FUTURE TECHNOLOGY MAKES MORE AND MORE COUNTRIES TO AFFORD AND LAUNCH SATELLITES, WORLDWIDE SATELLITE VULNERABILITY TO ASATS WILL CONTINUE TO GROW.

● EVER INCREASING SPACE DEBRIS HAS REACHED A TIPPING POINT. THIS GROWING MONSTER IS PLUNGING THE SPACE ASSETS OF THE PLANET IN A CRIPPLING EXISTENTIAL THREAT. ( This is a vertical demanding separate analysis)

Like someone said:-

WORLD WAR III IN SPACE?

IT IS CLOSER THAN YOU THINK.....

THE DRAGON LEAPS TO NEW HEIGHTS, OTHERS CHASE...




About the VIVEKANANDA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION

The Vivekananda International Foundation is an independent

non- partisan institution that conducts research and analysis on

domestic and international issues, and offers a platform for

dialogue and conflict resolution. Some of India’s leading

practitioners from the fields of security, military, diplomacy,

government, academia and media fields have come together to

generate ideas and stimulate action on national security issues.

The defining feature of VIF lies in its provision of core

institutional support which enables the organization to be flexible

in its approach and proactive in changing circumstances, with a

long-term focus on India’s strategic, developmental and

civilisational interests. The VIF aims to channelize fresh insights

and decades of experience harnessed from its faculty into

fostering actionable ideas for the nation’s stakeholders.

Since its establishment, VIF has successfully embarked on quality

research and scholarship in an effort to highlight issues in

governance and strengthen national security. This is being

actualized through numerous activities like seminars, round

tables, interactive-dialogues, Vimarsh (public discourse),

conferences and briefings. The publications of the VIF form the

lasting deliverables of the organisation’s aspiration to impact on

the prevailing discourse on issues concerning India’s national

interest.

VIVEKANANDA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION

3, San Martin Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi – 110021 Tel: 011-24121764, Fax: +91-11-24106698

Email: [email protected], Website: http://www.vifidia.org


http://www.vifidia.org/

anti satellite weapons: a likely future trajectory...higher range missiles were introduced taking...

Documents