appa joint action workshop tucson, az january 9, 2006 joint action still relevant, after all these...

23
APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS Bill D. Carnahan Executive Director

Upload: dana-hudson

Post on 16-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

APPA Joint Action WorkshopAPPA Joint Action Workshop

Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006

JOINT ACTION

STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

JOINT ACTION

STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

Bill D. CarnahanExecutive Director

Page 2: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

What Do We Want to Accomplish Today?What Do We Want to Accomplish Today?

• Review What External Factors Influence Success

• Review What Internal Factors Influence Success

• Determine What We Have in Common

• Review What External Factors Influence Success

• Review What Internal Factors Influence Success

• Determine What We Have in Common

Page 3: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

Why Were Joint Action Agencies Created?Why Were Joint Action Agencies Created?

To provide “collective” projects, activities and services that are more economical and efficient than the members can do individually

Page 4: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

SCPPA PROFILE

Page 5: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

VITAL STATISTICSVITAL STATISTICS• DIVERSITY

SIZE Banning to LADWP

(10,000 Customers) (1.4 Million Customers)

Average - 50,000 to 100,000 Customers

(Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena, Anaheim, Riverside, Imperial Irrigation District)

LOCATION

Metropolitan – Coastal – Inland – Desert

LOAD CONTROL AREAS

CAL ISO – Anaheim, Riverside, Pasadena, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Vernon, Cerritos

LADWP – Burbank and Glendale

IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT

• DIVERSITY

SIZE Banning to LADWP

(10,000 Customers) (1.4 Million Customers)

Average - 50,000 to 100,000 Customers

(Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena, Anaheim, Riverside, Imperial Irrigation District)

LOCATION

Metropolitan – Coastal – Inland – Desert

LOAD CONTROL AREAS

CAL ISO – Anaheim, Riverside, Pasadena, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Vernon, Cerritos

LADWP – Burbank and Glendale

IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT

Page 6: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

VITAL STATISTICSVITAL STATISTICS• DIVERSITY

RESOURCES

Local Generation – LADWP, Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena, Imperial Irrigation District

Local Peaking Generation – LADWP, Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena, Riverside, Anaheim, Vernon, Colton, Imperial Irrigation District

SCPPA-Financed Generation = 2,000 MW

SCPPA Aggregate Peak Member Load = 9,000 MW

SCPPA Aggregate Member Population = approx. 5 Million

• DIVERSITY

RESOURCES

Local Generation – LADWP, Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena, Imperial Irrigation District

Local Peaking Generation – LADWP, Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena, Riverside, Anaheim, Vernon, Colton, Imperial Irrigation District

SCPPA-Financed Generation = 2,000 MW

SCPPA Aggregate Peak Member Load = 9,000 MW

SCPPA Aggregate Member Population = approx. 5 Million

Page 7: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

VITAL STATISTICSVITAL STATISTICS

GOVERNANCE – SCPPA Board composed of Member Utility

General Managers (no elected officials on

Board)

CAFETERIA-STYLE PROJECTS – Members pick projects to

participate in

SMALL STAFF – Reliance on member’s-staff to supplement SCPPA

staff

REVENUE BOND FINANCING – Power Supply Contracts providing

security for bonds (to date have issued in

excess of $6 Billion)

GOVERNANCE – SCPPA Board composed of Member Utility

General Managers (no elected officials on

Board)

CAFETERIA-STYLE PROJECTS – Members pick projects to

participate in

SMALL STAFF – Reliance on member’s-staff to supplement SCPPA

staff

REVENUE BOND FINANCING – Power Supply Contracts providing

security for bonds (to date have issued in

excess of $6 Billion)

Page 8: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

RESULTS: (early years)

Financing participation in large central station generating plants (coal, nuclear and hydro), and,

Financing and constructing interstate high voltage transmission lines to bring the power home,

and,

Provided some services

RESULTS: (early years)

Financing participation in large central station generating plants (coal, nuclear and hydro), and,

Financing and constructing interstate high voltage transmission lines to bring the power home,

and,

Provided some services

Why Joint Action Agencies Were CreatedWhy Joint Action Agencies Were Created

Page 9: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

Palo Verde (Nuclear)

Mead/PhoenixMead/Adelanto (Transmission)

Hoover Upgrade (Hydro)

Southern Trans. System

San Juan (Coal)

TIMELINE OF SCPPA PROJECTSTIMELINE OF SCPPA PROJECTS

YEARS

Page 10: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

TIMELINE OF SCPPA SERVICESTIMELINE OF SCPPA SERVICES

LOBBYINGPROJECT REPRESENTATION

YEARS

Page 11: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

RESULTS: (restructuring years)

After passage of Restructuring Legislation (AB 1890) and direct access, members felt like they could become competitors.

Played cards close to vest, not willing to share resource plans.

Joint action projects and services suffered.

Why Joint Action Agencies Were CreatedWhy Joint Action Agencies Were Created

Page 12: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

Palo Verde (Nuclear)

Mead/PhoenixMead/Adelanto (Transmission)

Hoover Upgrade (Hydro)

Southern Trans. System

San Juan (Coal)

TIMELINE OF SCPPA PROJECTSTIMELINE OF SCPPA PROJECTS

AB 1890 Years

YEARS

Page 13: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

TIMELINE OF SCPPA SERVICESTIMELINE OF SCPPA SERVICES

LOBBYINGPROJECT REPRESENTATION

YEARS

Public Benefit Programs

AB 1890 Implementation

Page 14: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

RESULTS: (after restructuring years)

Why Joint Action Agencies Were CreatedWhy Joint Action Agencies Were Created

• MEMBERS REALIZED DIRECT ACCESS WAS NOT COMING

• RALLIED AROUND “LOCAL CONTROL” AND VERTICAL INTEGRATION

• RECOGNIZED WORKING TOGETHER WAS A GOOD THING

• BEGAN PLANNING NEW GENERATION

• EMBRACED RENEWABLES

• INCREASED COOPERATION IN DELIVERY OF SERVICES

• REINVIGORATED SCPPA AND JOINT ACTION CONCEPT

Page 15: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

Board of DirectorsBoard of Directors

Executive DirectorExecutive Director

Finance

Resource Planning

Public Benefits

CustomerService

T&D E&O

ProjectDevelopment

SCPPA STAFF

SCPPA ORGANIZATION STRUCTURESCPPA ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE

LegalLADWP ACCTG

Page 16: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

PROJECT DEVELOPMENTPROJECT DEVELOPMENT

Project Development Agreement

|Steering Committee

Project Development Agreement

|Steering Committee

Member CityCouncil Approval

SCPPA BoardApproval

SCPPA BoardApproval

PROJECTPROJECT

Page 17: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

Palo Verde (Nuclear)

Mead/PhoenixMead/Adelanto (Transmission)

Hoover Upgrade (Hydro)

Southern Trans. System

San Juan (Coal)

TIMELINE OF SCPPA PROJECTSTIMELINE OF SCPPA PROJECTS

Magnolia (Gas)

Gas Reserves

Renewables

YEARS

Page 18: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

NATURAL GAS RESERVE ACQUISITIONNATURAL GAS RESERVE ACQUISITION

PURPOSE: Purchase natural gas reserves, in place, and transport gas to California border and then to the burner-tip

• Fuel Portfolio Diversity (Approx. 15-20% of Total)

• Less Price Volatility

• Secure Supply

• More Economical

• Economies of Scale (SCPPA)

Page 19: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

FIRST NATURAL GAS ACQUISITIONFIRST NATURAL GAS ACQUISITION

• July 2005 – Anschutz Pinedale Corp.• Pinedale Wyoming – Pinedale Anticline• $300 Million• 146 Bcfe of proved reserves – 1,250 operated

gross acres with a 42.5% Working Interest• Ultra Petroleum – Operator• Largest acquisition of natural gas reserves

by a U.S. governmental history• 40,000 MDF per day delivery (60,000 Goal)• 32 Operating Wells• Transition Agreement

Page 20: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

CURRENT RENEWABLESCURRENT RENEWABLES

Goal: 20% Renewables by 2017

• 2010 Target ?

• What Counts as a Renewable?

• What if the Utility doesn’t need Resources?

• Impact on Rates

• Production Tax Credit Equivalent

ISSUES:

SCPPA MEMBERS – RENEWABLE PROGRAMS = $70 MILLION (5 YEARS)

69 PROJECTS ---- 588 MEGAWATTS (1 MW = 750 HOMES)

WIND = 201 MW GEOTHERMAL = 190 MW

LANDFILL GAS = 32 MW SMALL HYDRO = 97 MW

BIO CONVERSION = 60 MW

Page 21: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

TIMELINE OF SCPPA SERVICESTIMELINE OF SCPPA SERVICES

LOBBYINGPROJECT REPRESENTATION

YEARS

Ice BearBenchmarking

Joint ContractingResource Planning

Market Intelligence“Almost Anything”

Page 22: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

FUTURE RENEWABLESFUTURE RENEWABLES

WIND

GEOTHERMAL

Currently Negotiating for:

• 150 Megawatts of Geothermal

• 475 Megawatts of Wind in California, Oregon, Wyoming, and Utah

• 100 Megawatts of Solar

• 15 Megawatts of Landfill Gas

• Could be as high as 800 Megawatts

Contract and Ownership Options

($600 Million – Ownership)

Transmission Construction

(Upgrades and New)

Page 23: APPA Joint Action Workshop Tucson, AZ January 9, 2006 JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS JOINT ACTION STILL RELEVANT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

KEYS TO SUCCESSKEYS TO SUCCESS

• Look for Common Ground

• Give Members the Spotlight

• Don’t Compete With Member Staff

• Never Say, “We Can’t”

• Encourage Large Members to Help Small Ones

• Treat All Members Equally

• Look for Common Ground

• Give Members the Spotlight

• Don’t Compete With Member Staff

• Never Say, “We Can’t”

• Encourage Large Members to Help Small Ones

• Treat All Members Equally