appendix a – individual plaintiff allegations · 2020. 3. 3. · d. b.c., a minor, through his...
TRANSCRIPT
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
1
APPENDIX A – INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFF ALLEGATIONS
A. HasnatAhmad..............................................................................................................3
B. LilianaAndrade...........................................................................................................6C. JoseAngullo..................................................................................................................9
D. B.C.,aminor,throughhisParentandNaturalGuardianMaryBaker….12E. AdamBanner............................................................................................................13
F. TommyBenham.......................................................................................................16
G. D.C.throughhisparentandnaturalguardianKishaChandler................19H. BradleyColgate........................................................................................................20
I. KaytlinMcKnight.....................................................................................................22
J. Q.C.throughhisparentandnaturalguardianAnjieComer......................23K. A.U.,andhermotherandnaturalguardian,LisaCommitante.................24
L. D.C.andhismotherandNaturalGuardianReneeDeeter..........................24M. D.D.andC.D.,minors,throughtheirParentandNaturalGuardian
JosephDiGiacinto....................................................................................................25
N. K.S.thoughhisparentandNaturalGuardianRachelleDollinger...........28O. J.D.throughhisparentandnaturalguardianNicoleDramis...................30
P. JillianFurey...............................................................................................................32
Q. M.H.,andhermotherandnaturalguardian,JenniferHellman...............33R. AustinHester............................................................................................................35
S. EdgarKalenkevich..................................................................................................37T. DavidKugler..............................................................................................................42
U. TracieKugler,onbehalfofherson,Z.K,aminor..........................................44
V. KacieAnnLagun(néeDurham)..........................................................................46W.DavidLangan.............................................................................................................49
X. JonathanMardis.......................................................................................................51Y. M.C.throughhisParentandNaturalGuardianJeannineManning.........52
Z. DavidMasessa...........................................................................................................54
AA. RonMinas...................................................................................................................59BB. L.B.,andhermotherandnaturalguardianJillNelson...............................60
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
2
CC. S.G.,aMinor,throughherParentandNaturalGuardianAshleyNoble.62
DD. D.O.throughhermotherandnaturalguardianAtoyiaOrders................64EE. JackRoberts...............................................................................................................66
FF. W.T.andA.R.T.,bothminors,throughtheirparentandNaturalGuardianTonyaRowan.........................................................................................70
GG. AmberRoyce.............................................................................................................72
HH. D.S.,aminor,throughhisParentandNaturalGuardianAmberSelfridge........................................................................................................................................73
II. LauraStaller..............................................................................................................75
JJ. AnthonySmith..........................................................................................................77KK. CoreySmith................................................................................................................79
LL. T.B.T.throughhisparentandNaturalGuardianMarleneThomseth-Belcher........................................................................................................................79
MM. MichaelViscomi.......................................................................................................81
NN. O.V.throughherparentandnaturalguardianTanyaViti.........................84OO. S.W.throughhisparentandnaturalguardianJoeWeibel…....................86
PP. J.Y.,aMinor,throughhisParentandNaturalGuardianBarbaraYanucci......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................87
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 2 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
3
A. Hasnat Ahmad
1. PlaintiffHasnatAhmad (“Ahmad”)attendsuniversityinChicago,
IllinoisbutresidedinEuless,Texaswhenthetransactionsdescribedbelow
occurred.
2. BeforeusingaJUULforthefirsttimeinOctober2017,attheageof17,
Ahmad hadseenJUULadvertisementsandpromotionsonInstagramandTwitter.
TheseadvertisementspromotedJUUL’sflavors,discountedStarterKitsandAuto-
shipservice.Instores,AhmadalsosawJUULpointofsalematerialspromoting
JUUL’sdiscountedStarterKits,flavors,andhigh-techdesign.PriortousingaJUUL,
noneoftheadvertisementsorin-storepromotionsPlaintiffsawdisclosedthenature
oraddictionrisksofJUUL’sproducts,theexistenceoramountofnicotineinJUUL’s
products,orthattheJUULwasengineeredtodelivernicotinetothebloodstream
morerapidlyandingreaterquantitiesthanacigarette.Nordidtheyindicatethat
theJUULwasanage-restrictedproduct.Instead,theseadvertisementsportrayed
JUULasastylish,high-techwayto“beattheAugustheat”or“enjoydessertwithout
thespoon.”
3. WhenAhmadwasofferedamango-flavoredJUULbyoneofhismany
highschoolfriendswhohadtakenupJUULuse,hehadneversmokedacigaretteor
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 3 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
4
usedanyothertobaccoproduct.AhmaddecidedtotrytheJUULbecauseeverything
hehadseenhadledhimtobelievethatJUULusewasfunandharmless.Though
AhmadwouldhaveknowntoavoidaTobaccoorMentholflavorede-cigarette
offeredtohim,hedidnotthinkamango-flavoredJUULcouldbedangerousor
addictive.HadAhmadknowntherisks,hewouldnothaveusedaJUUL.
4. AhmadenjoyedthefeelingandsocialacceptanceofJUULing.Hesoon
startedpurchasingJUULproductsfromfriendsatschooland,onrareoccasions,
fromsellersoneBayusinghisparents’creditcard,explainingtohisparentsthatthe
resultingchargeswereschool-related.Thisdeceptioncausedhimagreatdealof
guilt,buthewassodesperatetoobtainnicotinethathecouldnotrestrainhimself.
5. AfterAhmadvisitedJUUL’swebsiteforthefirsttimein2017,JUUL
begansendinghimpromotionale-mailsofferingdiscountsandpromotingJUUL
flavors,includingwhatwouldbecomehispreferredflavor,CoolMint.Noneofthose
promotionsdisclosedthenicotinecontentofMintpodsorthatMintpodscould
containupto94mg/mLnicotine.Iftheyhad,AhmadwouldnothaveusedMint
pods.
6. OnFebruary27,2018,whenAhmadwasstill17,hepurchaseda
“BasicKit”directlyfromJUUL’swebsiteusinghisparent’screditcardand
identification.
7. Onsocialmedia,AhmadsawasignificantamountofJUULpromotional
contentfromthirdparties,includingtheInstagramaccounts@Doit4JUULand
@JUULTricks.OnYouTube,AhmadsawnumerousvideosfromDonnySmokes,
includingtheJUULChallenge.OnSnapchat,AhmadsawsimilarJUULcontent
createdbyhisownfriendsandclassmates.ThesocialmediacontentAhmadsaw
andwhichdrovethesurgeinpopularityamonghisfriendswasovertlyyouth-
orientedandpromotednicotineabuse,downplayedornormalizedaddiction
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 4 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
5
risks,encouragedJUULuseinschool,providedguidanceonhowto
concealaJUUL,createdtheimpressionthatJUULusewasmorecommonthanitwas,
andthatJUULingwasthe“cool”thingtodo.Theseaccountsalsoencouragedviral
contentcreationbyencouragingviewerstoposttheirownJUUL-relatedcontent,
includingselfies,nicotineabuse“tricks”likeinhalingtenJUULsatonce,memes
normalizingaddictionandadolescentuseofJUULproducts,andimagerysuggesting
thatJUULusemightimproveaperson’sdatingprospects.Ahmaddidnotknowthat
muchofthecontenthesawwasbeingcreated,distributed,andpromotedbyJUUL
vendorswhoseaimwastopromoteJUULusetoadolescentsandprofitfromtheir
addiction.HadAhmadknownthathewasbeingbombardedbymarketingaspartof
aschemetoaddicthimtonicotine,hewouldhaverejectedofferstouseaJUULor
wouldhaveattemptedtostopusingaJUULfarsoonerthanhedid.
8. Copyingthebehaviorthathadbeenmodeledforhimbycool,
attractivesocialmediainfluencersandaccounts,Ahmadmimickedmanyofthe
behaviorshesawonsocialmediaandpostedhisownJUUL-relatedcontentto
Snapchat.Forexample,AhmadpostedpicturesofaJUULonMarch23and26,2018.
9. SoonafterhestartedusingaJUUL,Ahmadwasconsumingonetotwo
JUULpodsperday,whichcosthimabout$35eachweek.
10. AlittleoverayearafterhisfirstJUULuse,Ahmadbegansmoking
combustiblecigarettesonatripabroad.HenowsmokesMarlborocigarettesand
usesaJUUL.
11. Currentlyafreshmanincollege,Ahmadisbadlyaddictedtonicotine
buthasbeenunabletoquiteitherJUULorcigarettes.Whenhegoesmorethanaday
withoutnicotine,hesuffersfromsevereheadaches,dizzinessandblurredvision.
12. AhmadstillconsumesonetotwoJUULpodsperdayalongwithupto
halfapackofcigarettes.HestartsusingJUULwithin5minutesofwakingup,andhe
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 5 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
6
JUULsandsmokesthroughouttheday.HeconsidersthedecisiontostartJUULingas
oneoftheworstmistakesofhislife.
B. Liliana Andrade
13. PlaintiffLilianaAndrade(“Andrade”)isaresidentofSanford,Florida.
14. AndradestartedusingJUULin2015whenshewas15yearsold.Prior
toherfirstJUULexperience,shehadtriedcigarettesafewtimesbuthadneverbeen
aregularsmoker.
15. BeforeAndradeusedaJUULforthefirsttime,shehadseenJUUL
advertisementsinlocalgasstationsandJUULpostsonTwitter.Thein-store
advertisementspromotedJUUL’sflavorsandoffereddiscountsontheJUULdevice
and“StarterKit.”TheTwitterpostsportrayedfashionableyoungpeopleusingJUUL
whileengaginginplayfulposes.NoneoftheJUULcontentAndradesawdisclosed
thatJUULwasanage-restrictedproduct,thatitcontainsnicotine,anddelivers
nicotinetothebloodstreamatleastasefficientlyascigarettesandpresentsariskof
nicotineaddiction.
16. AndradealsovisitedJUUL’swebsitebeforeusingaJUUL.She
remembersthatthewebsitepresentedtheJUULasalifestyleproductinsteadofa
highlyaddictivenicotinedeliverysystem.Shedoesnotrememberseeingany
warningsaboutnicotineoraddictiononJUUL’shomepage.
17. ShedoesrememberseeingtheJUULchartin138below,comparinga
cigarettetoaJUULandshowingtheJUULtobelessharmfulthanacigarette.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 6 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
7
18. DuringonevisittoJUUL’swebsite,Andradesigneduptoreceivee-
mailupdates.Sincethen,JUULhassenthernumerouse-mailpromotionsand
surveys.
19. AlthoughAndradewasnotasmokerlookingtoswitchfromcigarettes,
whenherfriendofferedheraFruitMedleyJUUL,shedecidedtotryitbecauseshe
thoughtthe“fruitmedley”flavorsoundedappealingandshedidnotunderstandthe
risksJUULposed.ShewouldnothavetriedaJUULifitwasnotfruitflavored.
20. Andradefoundthatshelikedthefruitflavor,thevapor’slackof
harshness,andthe“buzz,”ornicotineimpact,oftheFruitMedleypods.Afterher
firstJUULexperience,shewoulduseherfriends’JUULseverytimeshe
could.Withinafewweeks,shepurchasedherownJUULdevicefromafriendand
beganpurchasingJUULpodsfromclassmates.
21. OnceshehadaJUULdeviceofherown,Andrade’sJUULconsumption
quicklyescalated.Withinashorttime,shewasconsumingoneJUULpodeveryday.
22. Likemanyofherfriendsinhighschool,Andradewasveryactiveon
socialmediaplatformsincludingFacebook,Twitter,andInstagram.Onthese
platforms,AndradesawpostsfromJUULsuggestingthatshe“beattheAugustheat
withCoolMint”andthatshetakethetimeto“enjoyaJUULmoment.”Otherposts
presentedJUULasan“essential”devicetohaveonhandwhentravelingorsimply
leavingthehousefortheday.ThismessagingconvincedAndradethatJUULwasan
indulgencethatsheshouldmakeapartofherdailyroutine.Andradefollowedor
otherwisecloselyobservedJUUL’ssocialmediaaccountsstartinginlate2015and
wasexposedtothethemes,imagesandhashtagmarketingcampaignsdescribedin
thecomplaint.
23. OnFacebook,AndradesawJUUL’spromotionofimagesofKatyPerry
andOrlandoBloomsharingaJUUL,multipleflavorpromotionsforJUUL’s“Makeita
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 7 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
8
MangoMonday”campaign,CoolMintJUULpods,andseveralotherflavor
promotions.
24. AndradesawJUUL’sVaporizedpromotionsonTwitter,which
includedseveraladvertisementsfeaturingstylishyoungwomenholdingJUUL
productsaswellasimagesoffromJUUL’slaunchparties.
25. OnthesocialmediaplatformSnapchat,Andradehasbeenexposedto
JUUL-relatedpoststhatnormalizenicotineabuseamongteenagers,promote
websitesthatsellJUULproductsandJUUL-compatibleproductsandencourage
otheradolescentstocreatesimilarcontent.TheseJUULpromotionsofteninclude
hashtagsfromsocialmediacampaignsstartedorpromotedbyJUULincluding
#juulnation,#juul,and#juulvapor.
26. OnInstagram,AndradesawJUUL’spromotionsofinfluencerZayas.
AndradedidnotknowthatZayaswasbeingpaidtouseaJUULandpromoteJUULon
Instagram.
27. Andrade’sfavoriteflavorsareCoolCucumber,MangoandFruit
Medley.Althoughshehastriedeverypodflavor,shehasneverpurchasedtobaccoor
menthol-flavoredpods.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 8 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
9
28. ThoughAndradeisnowover18andbuysJUULpodslegally,sheis
awareofmultiplestoresandgasstationsinherareathatsellJUULpods—oftenat
significantmarkups—tominorswithoutageverification.Thenearestisalessthan
five-minutewalkfromherhighschool.
C. Jose Angullo
29. Jose Angullo is a 23 year old resident of Virginia.
30. Plaintiff Angullo started using JUUL products in 2018 after hearing a
radio commercial on station DC101, seeing advertisements in gas stations, and he also
saw JUUL content on social media including Facebook, and received promotional emails
from JUUL.
31. Plaintiff bought JUUL to see what it was because the marketing made it
seem like a safer alternative to smoking and did not contain any warnings. He
specifically saw this ad (available at https://bit.ly/2UbgJRo)
32. Prior to using JUUL, Plaintiff Angullo used to smoke between 10-20
cigarettes per day.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 9 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
10
33. He now purchases JUUL at $17/per pack at the 7-11 convenience stores
and smokes one JUUL pod per day, and sometimes more.
34. Angullo noticed the 5% strength label on the JUUL pod and thought it
meant it was 5% of the nicotine of a regular cigarette.
35. JUUL’s in-store displayed belied the true nature of the nicotine content
and delivery from JUUL. Plaintiff saw these displays before using the product:
36. Plaintiff prefers to use the mango flavor, which is more palatable. He saw
specific ads related to mango that downplayed the or omitted the harms of exposure to
nicotine or warned of the content of nicotine in JUUL, including the following online and
on Twitter and Instagram:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 10 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
11
37. Plaintiff has received promotional emails and online content from JUUL,
none of which contained warnings explaining that JUUL pods contain and delivered more
nicotinethanapackofcigarettes.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 11 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
12
38. HesmokesJUULwithin5minutesofwakingup.JUULisstuckonhis
mindmorethancigaretteseverwereandhefeelscompletelyaddicted.
39. Plaintiffcoughseverydayandhasapersistentcoughthatnevergoes
away.
40. PlaintiffwouldnevernothavepurchasedJUULproductsifheknew
thetruenatureofnicotinecontentanddelivery,includingthatcontentinrelationto
apackofcigarettes.
D. B.C., a minor, through his Parent and Natural Guardian Mary Baker
41. PlaintiffB.C.andhisParentandNaturalGuardianMaryBaker
(“Baker”)areresidentsofHuntington,WestVirginia.
42. B.C.usedaJUULforthefirsttimein2016attheageof14.
43. PriortohisfirstJUULuse,B.C.hadseenpoint-of-sale(“POS”)
promotionalmaterialsforJUULdevicesandproducts,includingsignsanddisplays.
ThesepromotionalmaterialsfeaturedimagesofJUUL’smulticoloredfruit-and
dessert-flavoredpodsandoffersofdiscountsontheJUUL“StarterKit.”B.C.didnot
seeanywarningsordisclosuresinthesePOSmaterialsaboutJUUL’snicotinelevels
ortherisksJUULposed.TherepresentationsandomissionsinJUUL’sin-store
promotionsmateriallyimpactedB.C.’sassessmentof,andeventualdecisiontouse,
JUULproducts.
44. JUUL’smethodsofpromotingitsproductsonsocialmediaplatforms
foreseeablytriggeredtheviralspreadofJUUL-promotionalcontentthatencouraged
teenstotakeupJUULuse,promoteddrug-likebehaviors,distortedandomittedthe
risksofJUULuse,andmisledyouthaboutthenatureandrisksofJUULuse.These
promotionsreachedB.C.andB.C.’ssocialnetwork,includingclassmates,leadingto
anincreaseinuptakeonJUULproductsandwidespreadmisperceptionsaboutthe
natureandrisksofJUULproducts.ButforJUUL’ssocialmediaadvertising,B.C.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 12 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
13
wouldnothavebeenexposedto,andwouldnothaveused,JUULproducts.
45. WhenoneofB.C.’sfriendsofferedhimhisfirstpuffofaJUUL,B.C.
accepted.Shortlythereafter,hestartedbuyingJUULproductsofhisown.Atthis
time,B.C.didnotknowthatJUULpodscontainnicotineandcancausenicotine
addiction.HadB.C.knownthatJUULpodshavebeenformulatedtodelivernicotine
moreeffectivelythanacigarette,hewouldnothavestartedusingJUULproducts.
46. AlthoughwellbelowtheminimumlegalagetopurchaseJUUL
products,B.C.wasneverthelessabletopurchaseJUULproductsfromlocalstores
andclassmates.
47. B.C.wasstillbelowthelegalagetopurchaseJUULproductswhenhe
obtainedwarrantyserviceforhisJUULdevicefromtheJUULwebsitein2018.
48. Likemanyotherstudents,B.C.hasusedhisJUULatschool.Duetothis
in-schoolJUULuse,B.C.wassuspendedfromschoolthreetimesin2017andtwo
moretimesin2018.
49. BakerhassoughtassistanceforB.C.’snicotineaddictionbut,todate,
B.C.isstillhooked.
50. B.C.’scurrentlyconsumesoneJUULpodaday.Hetakeshisfirstpuffof
JUULwithin5minutesofwakingup.
E. Adam Banner
51. .PlaintiffAdamClaytonBanner(“Banner”)isaresidentofAsheville,
NorthCarolina.WhenheusedaJUULforthefirsttimein2017,attheageof33,
Bannerwasasocialsmokerwhosmokedlessthanonepackofcigarettesamonth,if
that.
52. PriortousingaJUUL,BannersawJUULadvertisinginstoresthat
promotedJUUL’sdevices,JUULpods,flavors,anddiscountedStarterKits.Those
promotionsdidnotdisclosethattheJUULcontainednicotine,warnofnicotine’s
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 13 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
14
risks,ordisclosethattheJUULcoulddelivermorenicotineperpuffthanacigarette
anddeliveredthatnicotinetothebloodstreamfasterthanacigarette.HadJUUL
disclosedthisinformation,BannerwouldnothaveusedaJUUL.
53. PriortousingaJUUL,BannersawasignificantamountofJUUL-
relatedpromotionsandcontentonInstagram,FacebookandTwitter.These
promotionspresentedJUULasahigh-techlifestyleproductforyoungadultslike
him,promotedJUUL’sflavors,discountsonStarterKits,anddidnotprovideany
meaningfulinformationforsmokerslookingtoswitchaboutthenicotinecontent,
delivery,orpharmacokineticsthatJUULhadcarefullyengineered.Nordidthe
postingsindicatethattheJUUL’scentralfunctionwastodeliverdosesofnicotine
thatcouldexceedthatofacigarette,thattheJUULcontainsatleast59mg/mL
nicotine,orthattheJUUL’snicotinehadbeenchemicallyalteredtocreatenicotine
impactthatequalsorexceedsacigarette.
54. BanneralsosawJUULcontentonsocialmediaincludingonFacebook,
Twitter,andInstagram.Thisfocus-flavoredcontentencouragedBannertotry
MangoJUULpodsand“start[his]weekwithCoolMintJUULpods.”The“Cool”Mint
advertisementsdidnotdisclosethattheMintpodscontainedupto94mg/mL
nicotine–morethantwicethe“5%strength”labelingstatementindicated.
55. ManyofJUUL’spostsincludedwhatappearedtobeuser-generated
postsfromyoungadultssharinga“#JUULmoment.”Bannerdoesnotrecallseeing
disclosuresaboutnicotineorwarningsaboutnicotineornicotineaddictioninanyof
JUUL’ssocialmediacontent.
56. WhenBanner’sbrother,ZacharyShaneGoforth,returnedfromcollege
inthesummerof2017,hebroughttheJUULhehadbegunusingatthestartofthe
year.Bannerdecidedtotryhisbrother’sJUULbecausethefruitflavorswere
appealingtohimandhisbrotherinsistedhetryJUULinginsteadofsmoking
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 14 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
15
cigarettes.
57. Abouttwomonthslater,BannerboughtadiscountedStarterKitofhis
ownsimilartohisbrother’s.
58. BannervisitedJUUL’swebsiteandsoonthereafterbeganreceiving
emailsfromJUUL.BannerdidnotseeanydisclosuresonJUUL’swebsitethatJUUL’s
Mintpodscontainatleast59mg/mLnicotineandcanexceed90mg/mL.Theemails
BannerreceivedpromotedJUUL’sflavoredpodsandthelifestyleappealofJUULuse.
NothinghesawonJUUL’swebsiteorinJUUL’semailsindicatedthattheJUUL
containedatleast59mg/mLofnicotine,thattheJUULdeliveredatleastasmuch
nicotineperpuffasacigarette,orthatthenicotinefromaJUULenteredthe
bloodstreamfaster,orcausedahigherpeakblood-nicotineconcentrationthana
cigarette.Instead,hisimpressionwasthattheJUULwasadeviceforquitting
smokingandthereforeposedlessrisksofaddictionthancigarettes.
59. BannersawandreliedontherepresentationthataJUULisequivalent
toapackofcigarettes,whichisimprintedonJUULpodpackaging,postedonJUUL’s
website,andpostedbythirdpartiesinreviewsandonsocialmedia.Heassumed
thataJUULwasdeliveringthesamekindandamountsofnicotineasacigarette.Had
heknownthattheJUULwaschemicallydesignedtodeliverstrongernicotineimpact
thanacigaretteorthattheJUULdeliveredmorenicotinethanacigarette,hewould
nothaveboughtaJUUL.
60. BannerunderstoodJUUL’slabelingrepresentationthatitwasan
“alternativetocigarettes”tomeanthattheJUULwasawaytomoveawayfrom
smoking.HadheknownthattheJUULcouldsorapidlyfosteranuncontrollable
addictiontonicotine—achemicalhehadbeenconsuminginamountshefound
manageableforapproximatelytenyears—hewouldnothaveusedorpurchaseda
JUUL.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 15 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
16
61. HadBannerknownthatJUUL’s“5%strength”labelingstatement
meantthatMintpodsalwayscontainedatleast20%morenicotinethanthelabel
disclosedandsometimesnearly100%nicotinethanthelabeldisclosed—hewould
nothavepurchasedorusedaJUUL.
62. SoonafterhestartedusingJUUL,Bannerfoundthathewouldsmoke
morethanheusedtowhenhisJUULwasempty.
63. Banneralsofoundthathisconsumptionrapidlyincreasedandwithin
ashortperiodoftime,hewasconsuminguptotwo“Cool”MintJUULpodsaday.
64. Recognizingthathisaddictionhadspiraledoutofcontrol,Banner
switchedtocigarettesbecausetheyweremoreeconomicalthanJUULpodsand
becausehefeltlikecigarettesallowedhimtocontrolhisaddictionbetterthana
JUUL.
65. BannernowconsumesatleasthalfaJUULpodandonepackof
cigaretteseveryday.
66. BannerhasrepeatedlyattemptedtoquitJUULingandsmokingwith
noluck.Afterseekingmedicalhelpfromhisphysician,Bannerwasprescribed
Wellbutrin,whichwasnoteffective.
F. Tommy Benham
67. PlaintiffTommyBenhamisaresidentofMichigan.
68. Benham,whois20yearsold,purchasedaJUULstarterkitattheage
of18.Hewasasmokerpriortohispurchase.BenhamdecidedtotryJUULproducts
basedonadvertisingthathesawinposters,magazines,andFacebookdepicting
JUULe-cigarettesasasafe,lessaddictivealternativetosmokingcigarettes.Hewas
smokingapackofcigarettesadayatthetimeandthoughtthattheJUULwouldhelp
himquitsmokingbyweaninghimfromcigarettes.Healsofoundthevarietyof
flavorsappealing,andwasattractedtotheeye-catchingcolorsandboldfontsused
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 16 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
17
intheJUULads.
69. AnumberoftheadsBenhamsawonFacebookarearchivedonthe
webpageforStanfordUniversityResearchintotheImpactofTobaccoAdvertising
(“SRITA”).Seehttp://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco_main/images_pods.php?
token2=fm_pods_st661.php&token1=fm_pods_img36435.php&theme_file=fm_pods_
mt068.php&theme_name=JUUL&subtheme_name=Facebook(accessedDecember
17,2018).
70. AmongtheJUULadsthatBenhamsawwerenumerousadsplacedon
FacebookaspartofJUUL’s“Switch”campaign.Theseincludedtestimonialads
toutingtheswitchtoJUULasanimprovementovercigarettesmoking,similarto
ADdvertisements57(“Switch”)and66(testimonial).TheseadsledBenhamto
believethatusingJUULproductswoulddecreasehisappetitefornicotine.
71. Benhamalsosawanumberof“SmokingEvolved”ads.See,e.g.,
AppendixC,Advertisements69-70.Benhamlikedthesleek,hightechlookofthe
deviceandthebrightcolorsoftheJUULpods.Thetagline“SmokingEvolved”led
BenhamtobelievethattheJUULpodhadbeendesignedtoavoidunhealthyside
effectsandbelessaddictivethantraditionalcigarettes.
72. BenhamsawnumerousJUULadsonFacebooktoutingthevarious
JUULpodflavors,includinglimitededitionflavorssuchasmango(beforeitbecamea
“permanent”flavor),menthol,andcoolcucumber.Id.,Ads24,59,62,and71-73.
ThevarietyofflavorswasamajorfactorinhisuseofJUUL,andhetriedessentially
everynewflavorthatcameout.JUUL’suseofinvitationstocommenton“which
flavorisyourfavorite”wasalsoengagingtoBenham,whocommentedonthe
variousflavorsinresponsetothoseads.BenhamalsosawadsframingJUULpod
flavorsassomethingtobepairedwithfoods,suchasadswith“featuredchef”
pairingsofJUULpodflavorswithrecipes.AppendixC,Ad76(“SaveRoomforJUUL”
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 17 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
18
ad).
73. BenhamalsosawnumerousadsonFacebookthattoutedlimited
editionJUULe-cigarettesinnewcolorssuchasNavyandGold.Id.,Ads74-75.
Benhampurchasedtheselimitededitione-cigarettesbecausehefelttheyhadmore
pizazzthanastandardblackJUULe-cigarette.
74. BenhamalsosawJUULadsleveragingthefactthatJUULe-cigarettes
wouldavoid“smellinglikeanashtray.”
75. AmongtheadsdiscussedabovethatBenhamsawwereadsusing
discountstopromotenewstylesofe-cigarettesandJUULpodflavors.Hesometime
purchasedJUULproductsatleastinpartinresponsetoseeingthesediscounts.See,
e.g.,Id.atAd67(point-of-saleposterwithdiscount,similartoFacebookads
showingdiscounts).
76. BenhamalsosawJUULadsonFacebookwithcelebrityimages,suchas
a2016adshowingOrlandoBloomandKatyPerrysharingaJUULe-cigarette.
BenhamperceivedtheseimagesasglamorizingJUULproductsandmakingthem
seemtrendy.
77. ManyoftheadsthatBenhamsaw,includingthosecirculatedpriorto
November2017,containednonicotinewarning.Nordidanyoftheadsdisclosethe
increasedpotencyofnicotinesaltsortherelativelyhighconcentrationsofnicotine
inJUULpodscomparedtoothere-cigarettenicotinesolutions.
78. AlthoughBenhamthoughtJUULwouldhelphimquitsmoking,hehas
founditevenmoreaddictivethancigarettes,tothepointwhereeventobaccoisan
inadequatesubstitute.Benhamnowfindsthathehastointerrupthisroutine
throughoutthedaytovapewithhisJUUL,andthatheisconsumingatleasteight
JUULpodpacksperweek.BenhamfavorsCool-MintflavoredJUULpods.Noneofthe
adsmentionedaboveinformedBenhamthatJUUL’snicotinesaltformulationwould
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 18 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
19
deliverhigher,morepotentdosesofnicotinethancigarettesorothervaping
solutions.HadBenhamknownthatthenicotinesaltsinJUULpodsweremorepotent
andaddictivethantraditionalcigarettes,hewouldnothavepurchasedJUUL
products.
G. D.C. through his parent and natural guardian Kisha Chandler
79. D.C.andhismotherKishaChandler(“Chandler”)areresidentsof
WillistonPark,NewYork.
80. PriortousingaJUULforthefirsttimeinAugust2017,attheageof15,
D.C.D.C.hadviewedincreasingamountsofJUUL-relatedcontentonvarioussocial
mediaplatforms.HehadalsoseenonlineJUULadvertisementspromotingJUUL
flavors.NoneofthisJUULmessagingdisclosedthatJUULproductscontainatleast
59mg/mLofnicotineanddelivernicotinetothebloodstreammoreeffectivelythan
cigarettes.
81. WhenD.C.wasofferedamango-flavoredJUULbyoneofhismanyhigh
schoolfriendswhohadtakenupJUULuse,hehadneversmokedacigarettebefore
orusedanyothertobaccoproduct.D.C.decidedtotrytheJUULbecauseeverything
hehadseenhadledhimtobelievethatJUULwasfun,harmless,and“cool.”When
ChandlercaughthersonwithJUULpodsinhisbedroom,D.C.toldherJUULwassafe
andnicotine-free;hetoldhismomtheJUULpodsonlycontainedwatervapor.
82. D.C.enjoyedthe“buzzed”feelinghereceivedfromtheJUUL’s
powerfulnicotinehit,andhequicklybecameaddictedtonicotine.D.C.andhis
friendsobtainedtheirJUULpodsfromnearbygasstationsandasmalllocaldeli.
Initially,thegasstationsanddelisoldJUULproductsdirectlytoD.C.andhisfriends.
Thereafter,D.C.andhisfriendswouldapproachadultsandaskthemtopurchasethe
JUULpodsforthem.
83. ChandlerdoesnotprovideD.C.withcash;instead,ifD.C.needsto
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 19 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
20
purchasesomething,D.C.usesappsonhisphone,whicharelinkedtoChandler’s
bankaccounts.Thus,inordertoobtainJUULpods,D.C.wouldtradefoodfor
JUULpods(i.e.“I’llgiveyou$20worthofWendy’sforaJUULpod).
84. EventhoughChandlerhasconfiscatednumerousJUULdevicesand
JUULpodsfromherson,D.C.hascontinuedtofindwaystoobtainJUULproducts.At
hispeakconsumption,D.C.wasconsumingtwo(2)tothree(3)JUULpodsadayand
spendinghundredsofdollarseachweekonJUULproducts.
85. D.C.’sJUULusehastakenasignificanttollonhisphysicaland
psychologicalhealth.SinceD.C.startedusingJUUL,hehasdevelopedachronic
cough.D.C.alsohassevereADHD.D.C.’sJUULusecounteractedwithhisADHD
medicationtothepointwhereD.C.’spsychiatristhadtoincreasethelevelofADHD
medicationhewasprescribed.Chandleralsobelievesherson’sJUULusehas
increasedhisanxietylevels.
86. ChandlerfearsD.C.willcontinueusingJUULwhenhereturnshome.
D.C.hasexpressedtohismotherthathewantstostopusingJUUL,buthecannot
becauseitmakeshimfeelsogood.
H. Bradley Colgate
87. PlaintiffBradleyColgateisaresidentofCalifornia.
88. In2017,BradleyColgate(“Colgate”)purchasedaJUULe-cigaretteand
JUULpodsattheageof24inanefforttocurtailhisnicotineaddictionandquit
smoking.HehadsmokedMarlborosforapproximatelysevenyears,andhatedbeing
asmoker.
89. Inthesummerandfallof2017,ColgatestartedseeingJUULadsacross
socialmedia.HetypicallyusedInstagramandFacebook,andrecallsseeingmany
JUULadsonbothplatforms.Inparticular,heremembersseeingaseriesof
Instagrampoststhatincludedtestimonialsfrompeoplewhohadswitchedfrom
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 20 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
21
cigarettestoJUUL.WhenloggingintoInstagram,hewouldsee“Instagram
sponsoredstories,”whichwereshortoneminutevideoadvertisements,andoften,
he’dbepresentedwithaJUULsponsoredstorythatwasintheformofatestimonial.
ThesetestimonialstypicallyinvolvedpeopledescribinghowJUULhelpedthemquit
smokingcigarettes.Whilehedidnotwatchthevideos,heoftenobservedthebrief
captionthatappearedbeneaththevideo,whichtypicallyencouragedhimto
“switch”fromcigarettestoJUUL.WhiletheprecisetestimonialsthatColgatesaware
nolongeravailableonline,Colgaterecallsseeingtestimonialsthatlookedsimilarto
Advertisement66ofAppendixC.Inparticular,herecalledseeinginthese
testimonialsphrasesthatdescribedJUULasan“alternative”tocigarettes,whichhe
understoodtomeannotunhealthyandlessaddictive.Healsorecallsseeing
advertisementsonbothInstagramandFacebookthatsimplycontainedtheword
“SWITCH,”includingtheadvertisementappearingatimage57ofAppendixC.
90. Aroundthatsametime,healsobeganseeingadvertisementsatstores.
Henoticedhowlargethestoreadvertisementswere,andwassurprisedtoseethe
adsondisplaynotjustatsmokeshops,butatconveniencestoresandgasstations,
suchas7-11.HealsonoticedthatthesestoresdisplayedJUULonthecounter,
insteadofbehinditwiththeothercigarettes.
91. BeforeColgatepurchasedJUULforthefirsttime,hesawotherJUUL
advertisementsonFacebookandInstagram.Inparticular,herecallsseeing
Instagramadvertisements57(“Switch”),58(JUULwithcoffee);59(usingJUULlike
atoytomakecoolvisualpatterns),and60(JUULpodsdisplayedasWarhol-inspired
popart),61(enjoyingaview),62(JUULwithcoffee,nearlyidenticaltoAd24)of
AppendixC.HealsorecallsseeingFacebookadsinSeptember2017fora“Device
Kit”andanotheronoraroundOctober4,2017thatencouragedhimto“[c]ustomise
aplanthatfitsyourlifestyle.”Id.,Advertisements63-64.HebelievedthatJUUL
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 21 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
22
wouldmakeiteasiertostopbeingasmoker.
92. OnthebasisofJUUL’sadvertisingcampaign,includingtheads
describedinthepreviousparagraph,ColgatedecidedtopurchaseJUULinoraround
October2017.WhileheknewpriortopurchasingJUULforthefirsttimethatJUUL
containednicotine,hebelievedbasedontheadvertisementsthatitcontainedless
nicotinethancigarettes,andthatitwasakintoanicotinechewinggumorother
productdesignedtohelppeoplequitsmoking.Atnotimewasheinformedthatit
hadmorenicotinethancigarettes.HadJUULdisclosedintheadvertisementsthatit
hadmorenicotineperpodthanapackofcigarettes,hewouldnothavemadethe
decisiontopurchaseJUUL.
93. RatherthanweaningColgateoffofnicotine,theintensedosageof
nicotinedeliveredbytheJUULproductsresultedinanincreasednicotineaddiction,
andanincreasedconsumptionofnicotineandJUULproductsbyColgate.Colgate
foundJUULsoaddictivethathedidnotsubscribetoJUUL’spodservice,ashewas
concernedthatbyhavingsomanypodsinthehouse,hewouldsmokemorethanhis
typicalpodadayduetoitsaddictivenature.Moreover,notonlyhastheincreased
nicotinemadeJUULhardertoquitthanregularcigarettes,butbecauseofthewayin
whichJUULrelentlesslycontinuedtoadvertisetohimonsocialmedia,Colgatehas
foundquittingJUULtobeevenmoredifficultthanquittingcigarettesduetothefact
thatheiscontinuouslyremindedofit.
94. HadColgateknownthetruthofthematteraboutJUUL,hewouldnot
havepurchasedJUULproducts.
I. Kaytlin McKnight
95. KaytlinMcKnight(“McKnight”)isaresidentofArroyoGrande,San
LuisObispoCounty,California.
96. In2017,ClassrepresentativeKaytlinMcKnightpurchasedaJUULe-
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 22 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
23
cigaretteandJUULpods.McKnightsubsequentlybecameaddictedtonicotinesalts.
McKnightnowconsumesseveralJUULpodseachweek.
97. HadMcKnightknownthetruthofthematteraboutJUUL,shewould
nothavepurchasedJUULproducts.
J. Q.C. through his parent and natural guardian Anjie Comer
98. Q.C.andhismotherandnaturalguardianAnjieComer(“Comer”)are
residentsofFortWorth,Texas.Q.C.beganusingJUULaroundMarch2018attheage
of16.
99. BeforeQ.C.eventriedJUUL,heviewedpoint-of-sale(“POS”)
promotionalmaterialsforJUULdevicesandproducts,includingsignsanddisplays.
ThesepromotionalmaterialsfeaturedimagesofJUUL’smulticoloredfruit-flavored
pods.Q.C.didnotseeanywarningsordisclosuresinthesePOSmaterialsabout
JUUL’snicotinelevelsortherisksJUULposed.Therepresentationsandomissionsin
JUUL’sin-storepromotionsmateriallyimpactedQ.C.’sassessmentof,andeventual
decisiontouse,JUULproducts.
100. WhenQ.C.wasofferedaJUULbyafriendatschool,hehadnever
smokedorusedanyothertobaccoproduct;hedecidedtotryaJUULbecausethe
fruitflavorssoundedintriguing,hebelievedtheJUULposednoseriousrisks,and
JUULinghadgrownincreasinglycommonathisschool.Q.C.hadseen
advertisementsforJUULonsocialmediaandwasledtobelieveJUULdidnotcontain
anynicotine.
101. Q.C.wouldnothavestartedusingJUULifheknewitcontained
nicotine.Additionally,Q.C.wouldnothaveusedatobaccoormenthol-flavoredJUUL
becauseheassociatesbothofthoseflavorswithcigarettes,whichheknewtoavoid.
102. PeerpressureandJUUL’snarcoticeffectofnicotineledQ.C.tousehis
friend’sJUULrepeatedlyoverthecourseofthenextfewweeks.UsingJUULbecame
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 23 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
24
asocialactivitythatQ.C.engagedwithregularlywithhisfriendsduringandafter
school.
103. ComerhasnoticedthatsincehersonbeganusingJUUL,ithasmade
himexperienceseveremoodswings.
104. HadQ.C.knowntherisksofusingaJUULorthatthesudden
popularityofJUULwasnotbecausetheJUULwas“cool”butbecauseJUULwasusing
deceptiveadvertisingtacticstolureteenagerstoitspowerfullyaddictiveproduct,
hewouldnothaveusedaJUUL.
K. A.U., and her mother and natural guardian, Lisa Commitante
105. A.U.andherparentandlegalguardian,LisaCommitante,areresidents
ofNewYork.
106. A.U.beganJUULingattheageof14,afterpurchasingaJUULand
JUULpodsatasmokeshop.A.U.wasattractedtothefruitflavorsproducedbythe
JUULpods,anddidnotrealizethatitcontainednicotine.Shesubsequentlybegan
consumingJUULpods,enticedbythefactthatitlookedcoolandherfriendswere
vapingJUULproducts.SheusedtheJUULfrequentlyuntilhermotherfoundand
confiscatedit.A.U.wouldnothavepurchasedtheJUULstarterkitifshehadknown
itcontainednicotine.
L. D.C. and his mother and Natural Guardian Renee Deeter
107. PlaintiffD.C.andhismotherandNaturalGuardianReneeDeeter
(“Deeter”)areresidentsofTucson,Arizona.
108. WhenD.C.usedaJUULforthefirsttimein2015,hewas13.Hehad
neversmokedorusedtobaccoproductsbefore.Healsodidnot—anddoesnot—
understandthatnicotinecausesaddictionorthatheisaddictedtonicotine.
109. BecauseD.C.isconvincedthatJUULuseissafeandnon-addictive,he
doesnotsharedetailsofhisusewithhisparents.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 24 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
25
110. D.C.maintainsthatnicotineisnotaddictive,eventhoughhesuffers
withdrawalsymptomswhenhedoesn’tuseJUUL.
111. DeeterdoesnotknowwhatJUULpodflavorD.C.triedfirst,butshe
believesthatheonlyconsumesfruit-flavoredJUULproducts.
112. D.C.activelyusesInstagram,Snapchat,andYouTubewhereheis
exposedtoJUUL-relatedcontentfromotheradolescentsandfromJUUL-related
accounts.
113. D.C.typicallypurchasesJUULproductsfromclassmates.
114. OtherparentsinformDeeterthattheyhaveseenJUUL-themed
SnapchatpostspostedbyD.C.aswellasvideosofD.C.smokingJUULs,butDeeter
doesnothaveaccesstoD.C.’saccounttoverify.
115. D.C.beginsJUULwithin30minutesofwakingupeverymorning.His
preferredflavorisFruitMedley.DeeterbelievesthatD.C.consumesatleastone
JUULpodeverytwodays.
M. D.D. and C.D., minors, through their Parent and Natural Guardian Joseph
DiGiacinto
116. PlaintiffsD.D.andC.D.andtheirParentandNaturalGuardianJoseph
DiGiacintoareresidentsofCotati,California.
117. BeforeD.D.usedaJUULforthefirsttimein2015,hewasnota
smoker.AshetoldC.D.thenightbeforeheusedaJUULforthefirsttime,hisfriends
werepeerpressuringhimintousingaJUULbecause“everyonewasdoingit”at
D.D.’shighschool.
118. D.D.continuedusingaJUULand,likemanyofhisclassmates,became
addictedtonicotine.
119. D.D.eventuallyconvincedC.D.touseaJUUL,too.BeforeC.D.hadever
triedaJUUL,hehadseenpoint-of-sale(“POS”)promotionalmaterialsforJUUL
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 25 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
26
devicesandproducts,includingsignsanddisplays.Thesepromotionalmaterials
featuredimagesofJUUL’smulticoloredfruit-anddessert-flavoredpodsandoffers
ofdiscountsontheJUUL“StarterKit.”C.D.didnotseeanywarningsordisclosures
inthesePOSmaterialsaboutJUUL’snicotinelevelsortherisksJUULposed.The
representationsandomissionsinJUUL’sin-storepromotionsmateriallyimpacted
C.D.’sassessmentof,andeventualdecisiontouse,JUULproducts.
120. C.D.lookeduptohisbrotherD.D.andeventuallyboughtaJUULfroma
classmatewhohadaspareforsale.
121. JUUL’smethodsofpromotingitsproductsonsocialmediaplatforms
foreseeablytriggeredtheviralspreadofJUUL-promotionalcontentthatencouraged
teenstotakeupJUULuse,promoteddrug-likebehaviors,distortedandomittedthe
risksofJUULuse,andmisledyouthaboutthenatureandrisksofJUULuse.These
promotionsreachedC.D.andD.D.’ssocialnetwork,includingclassmates,leadingto
anincreaseinuptakeonJUULproductsandwidespreadmisperceptionsaboutthe
natureandrisksofJUULproducts.ButforJUUL’ssocialmediaadvertising,C.D.
wouldnothavebeenexposedto,andwouldnothaveused,JUULproducts.
122. D.D.andC.D.arebothactiveonInstagramandFacebook.
123. OnInstagram,D.D.andC.D.wereexposedtoasignificantamountof
JUULpromotionalcontentfromthirdparties,includingtheInstagramaccounts
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 26 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
27
JUULusewas“cool,”safe,andappropriateforminors.Theaccountsalso
encouragedtheunlawfulpurchaseanduseofJUULproductsbyyouth.OnYouTube,
D.D.andC.D.sawnumerousJUUL-themedvideosfromDonnySmokesandSupreme
Patty.OnSnapchat,C.D.sawJUUL-themedcontentfromEonSmokeandOGNick,
andevenhisownfriends.Thiscontentwasovertlyyouth-orientedandpromoted
nicotineabuse,downplayedornormalizedaddictionrisks,encouragedJUULusein
school,providedguidanceonhowtoconcealaJUUL,createdtheimpressionthat
JUULusewasmorecommonthanitwas,andthatJUULingwasthe“cool”thingto
do.TheseaccountsalsosoldJUULproductsdirectlythroughInstagramand
promotedwebsitesthatsoldJUULproductswithinadequateageverification
procedures,ifanyatall.C.D.didnotknowthatmuchofthecontenthesawwas
beingcreated,distributed,andpromotedbyJUULvendorsorpaid
influencerswhoseaimwastopromoteJUULusetoadolescentsandprofitfromtheir
addiction.HadD.D.orC.D.knownthattheywerebeingtargetedbyvendorsofJUUL
products,orthatJUUL’sownviralmarketinghadpromotedandfacilitatedthese
accounts,D.D.andC.D.wouldhaverejectedofferstouseaJUULorwouldhavemade
effortstostopusingJUULsoonerthantheydid.
124. AlthoughC.D.was,andis,under18yearsofage,hewasableto
continuallyacquireanduseJUULproductsthroughD.D.andcountlessotherolder
highschoolstudents,andthusmaintainhisaddictiontonicotine.DiGiacintodoes
notknowwhereD.D.buysJUULproducts.
125. ThoughC.D.isaminor,hehasbeenreceivingasteadystreamof
promotionale-mailsfromJUULformonths.
126. C.D.’sInstagramandSnapchatstreamsarebombardedwith
advertisementsforJUULproductsandJUUL-relatedproducts.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 27 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
28
127. DiGiacintohasenlistedtheaidofschooladministratorsandhisfamily
doctorineffortstohaltC.D.andD.D.’snicotineaddiction.Hehasalsoattemptedto
keepC.D.andD.D.fromassociatingwithfriendswhouseJUULs.Noneofthese
effortshavebeensuccessful.
N. K.S. though his parent and Natural Guardian Rachelle Dollinger
128. K.S.andhismotherandNaturalGuardianRachelleDollingerare
residentsofBrownsburg,Indiana.
129. In2017,K.S.usedafriend’sJUULforthefirsttime.K.S.andhisfriend
wereboth13-year-oldsintheeighthgrade.K.S.wasnotasmokerandhadnotused
tobaccoproductsinthepast.
130. K.S.wouldnothaveusedaJUULifhewerenotofferedaproductina
candy-likeflavor.
131. DollingerdidnotknowwhataJUULwasuntilonedayK.S.toldher.
WhenDollingerlaterfoundoutthatK.S.wasusinga
JUUL,K.S.toldDollingerthatJUULusewasharmlessandsafeanddidnotcontain
nicotine.K.S.toldDollingerthathehadreviewedJUUL’swebsite,andthat
ifDollingerreviewedthewebsite,shetoowouldlearnthatJUULusewasharmless
andsafe.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 28 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
29
132. AlthoughK.S.wellbelowtheminimumlegalagetobuytobacco
products,heisneverthelessabletopurchaseJUULproductsfromthelocal
Speedwaygasstation.
133. Likemanyhighschoolstudents,K.S.isactiveonsocialmedia.On
InstagramandFacebook,hehasseenJUULadvertisementsinvitinghimto"start
yourweekwithCoolMintJUULpods,"to"experienceanewkindoftropical
getaway"withMangoJUULpods,orsimplyto"findyourfavoriteflavor."Otherads
hehasseenpresentJUULproductsalongsidecellphones,laptops,tabletcomputers,
booksandcoffeecups,allitemsfamiliartoK.S.Noneoftheseadsdisclosethat
JUULpodscontainatleast59mg/mLofnicotineandthattheydelivernicotinetothe
bloodstreamaseffectivelyormoreeffectivelythancigarettes.Rather,JUUL’sadsled
K.S.toconcludethatJUULisatastyindulgencethathecanenjoywithout
consequences.
134. Dollingerrecentlyfoundapproximately30emptyJUULpodswhile
cleaningK.S.’sroom.K.S.claimedthattherearevideosonYouTubethatexplain
howtorefillemptypods.
135. At14yearsofage,K.S.isaddictedtonicotine.AccordingtoDollinger,
hehasa“meltdown”ifhecannotgetJUULpods.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 29 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
30
O. J.D. through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis
136. PlaintiffJ.D.andhisparentandnaturalguardianNicoleDramis
(“Dramis”)resideinMillerPlace,NewYork.
137. J.D.beganusingJUULinNovember2017,attheageof14.Priortothis,
J.D.didnotsmokecigarettesoruseothertobaccoproducts.
138. BeforeusingJUULforthefirsttime,J.D.hadseennumerousJUUL
Vaporizedimagesonline,whichpromotedJUULpodflavorsanddepicted
fashionablydressedyoungpeoplestrikingplayfulposeswithJUULdevicesinhand.
See,e.g.,AppendixC,Advertisement46;seealso
https://inrejuul.myportfolio.com/vaporized.NoneoftheadvertisementsJ.D.saw
disclosedthenatureoraddictionrisksofJUUL’sproducts,theexistenceoramount
ofnicotineinJUUL’sproducts,orthattheJUULwasengineeredtodelivernicotineto
thebloodstreammorerapidlyandingreaterquantitiesthanacigarette.
139. BeforeJ.D.eventriedJUUL,healsoviewedpoint-of-sale(“POS”)
promotionalmaterialsforJUULdevicesandproducts,includingsignsanddisplays.
ThesepromotionalmaterialsfeaturedimagesofJUUL’smulticoloredfruit-flavored
pods.J.D.didnotseeanywarningsordisclosuresinthesePOSmaterialsabout
JUUL’snicotinelevelsortherisksJUULposed.Therepresentationsandomissionsin
JUUL’sin-storepromotionsmateriallyimpactedJ.D.’sassessmentof,andeventual
decisiontouse,JUULproducts.
140. WhenofferedaJUULbyafriendatschool,J.D.acceptedbecausehe
wasinterestedintryingthefruitflavors.J.D.believedthatJUULpodsdidnotcontain
nicotinebutweresimply“fruit-flavoredjuice.”
141. JUUL’suseoffruit-basedflavors,fruit-basedflavornamesandfruit-
basedadvertisingimageswasasubstantialfactorinJ.D.’sdecisiontouseand
continueusingaJUUL.JUUL’sfruit-basedpromotionsmisledJ.D.aboutthenatureof
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 30 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
31
JUUL’sproductanddistortedtherisksJUULproductsposed.J.D.wouldnothave
startedusingJUULifheknewitcontainednicotine.Additionally,J.D.wouldnothave
usedatobaccoormenthol-flavoredJUULbecauseheassociatesbothofthoseflavors
withcigarettes,whichheknewtoavoid.
142. PeerpressurewasalsoasignificantcontributingfactorinJ.D.’s
decisiontouseandcontinueusingaJUUL.J.D.hasconveyedtoDramisthat
everyoneathishighschoolwasusingJUUL,andhedidnotwanttobethe"oddman
out."
143. J.D.andhisfriendshavepurchasedJUULpodsfromolderstudentsat
schoolandatvapeshopsinthearea.
144. Athispeaklevelofconsumption,J.D.wasconsuminguptothree
JUULpodsperday;hebeganusingJUULwithinfiveminutesofwakingupinthe
morningandcontinuedusingJUULthroughouttheday.
145. J.D.beganusingJUULregularlyatschool;hewouldleaveclassand
takeextendedvisitstothebathroomtouseJUUL.Becauseofthis,Dramishas
receivedphonecallsfromJ.D.’steachersinformingherofherson’sabsencefrom
class.
146. DramisstatesJ.D.’sJUULusehashadsignificantpsychologicaland
socialeffectsonherson.DramissaysJ.D.becomesverynastyandirritatedwhenhe
cannotconsumeJUULduetohissevereaddictiontonicotine.J.D.enjoysusingJUUL
becauseitgiveshimahighandmakeshimfeelgood.
147. Socially,Dramissayshersonhasalwaysbeenanice,respectfulchild.
However,sinceusingJUUL,J.D.hasstartedhangingoutwithadifferentcrowdand
veerstheotherway.J.D.hasmadefriendswitholderkidsthathaveeasieraccessto
JUUL.
148. DramishasmademanyeffortstogethersontostopusingJUUL.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 31 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
32
DramishasgroundedJ.D.,takenawayhisspendingmoney,andbannedhimfrom
hangingoutwith“badinfluences.”Dramiswouldliketosendhersontoa
rehabilitationprograminordertotreathisaddictiontonicotineandputastopto
hisJUULuse.
P. Jillian Furey
149. PlaintiffJillianFureyis20yearsoldandaresidentofWashington,D.C.
150. PlaintiffFureystartedusingJUULin2018becausesheheardofJUUL
productsasanalternativetocigarettes.JUUL’smarketing,includingin-store
displaysandradioadvertisements,ledhertobelieveJUULwaslessriskyandnot
addictive.SheheardaJUULadontheradiostationDC101and97.9FMduringthe
classperiodtellinghershecould“switch.”
151. PlaintiffFureyusedtosmokeMarlborolights,andsheinitiallyused
oneJUULpodperweek,butnowusesupto1entireJUULpodperday.
152. ShehaspurchasedJUULfromgasstationsandconveniencestoresand
paysapproximately$20perpackofJUULpodsandupto$30perdayoreveryother
day.
153. ShedidnotseeanywarningsinJUULadsoronJUULadsingas
stationsorconveniencestores.
154. Sheusedtosmokeafewcigarettesperday(lessthanten)andnow
smokessignificantlymoreinnicotineinJUULpods.
155. ShesawtheJUULpackagessaid5%nicotine,whichtoher
representedasmalleramountofnicotinethancigarettes.
156. JUUL’sflavorsplayedasignificantroleinherchoosingtotryJUUL,as
sheprimarilysmokes“CoolMint”.
157. JUULhasincreasedherdependenceonnicotineandaggravatedher
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 32 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
33
addiction.ShesmokesJUULwithin5minutesofgettingupandfindsherselffar
moreaddictedthanwhenshesmokedcigarettes.ShehastouseJUULevery30
minutes.
158. Shehasalsobeencoughingsignificantlymoreoften,andhasbeen
feelingsickonaregularbasis,exhibitingsymptomssuchasshortnessofbreathand
breathingissues.
159. IfshedoesnothaveherJUULorcannotfinditshebecomesmore
agitatedandanxious;shefeelsmorebetterwhensheknowsshehasitonherand
canuseitatanytime.
160. JillianwouldneverhavetriedorpurchasedJUULhadsheknownthe
truthaboutitsnicotinecontentanddelivery,andthenatureofitsimpactonher
health.
Q. M.H., and her mother and natural guardian, Jennifer Hellman
161. PlaintiffM.H.andhermotherandnaturalguardianJenniferHellman
(“Hellman”)areresidentsofNewHope,PennsylvaniabutlivedinRobbinsville,New
JerseyuntilJuly2018.
162. In2016,M.H.’solderbrotherstartedusingaJUULalongwithmanyof
hisfriendsinhighschool.1
163. M.H.’sbrothertoldherwhathebelievedtobetrue:theJUULcomesin
funflavorsandheallowedhertousehisJUUL.
164. PriortoandafterusingaJUUL,M.H.sawandreliedonJUUL’ssigns
andpromotionsinlocalgasstations.
165. WhenM.H.triedtheJUUL,shelikedthewayittastedandthebuzz
fromnicotine.BecausemanyofherfriendshadstartedusingJUULs,too,M.H.found
1Duetoanoversightbycounsel,inaccurateallegationshadbeenmadeintheFirstAmendedComplaintthathavenowbeencorrected.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 33 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
34
herselfusingaJUUL.
166. M.H.andherfriendsareactiveonsocialmedia,whereM.H.sawposts
fromherandherbrother’sfriendsaboutJUULuse,sawpoststhatencouraged
adolescentuseofJUULproductsandpromotedusingJUULproductsatschool.This
onlinecontentreinforcedM.H.’sbeliefthattheJUULwasaharmlessproductmade
forteenagers.M.H.’smothersawpostsfromherdaughterofM.H.usingJUUL,
mimickingwhatshehadseenonother’ssocialmedia.
167. Now17yearsold,M.H’sspendingonJUULpodsandJUULdeviceshas
totaledatleast$2000,someofwhichsheearnedherselfandsomeof
whichHellmanprovidedthroughgiftsofmoney,notrealizingthatshewasfunding
M.H.’saddiction.
168. AllofM.H.’sfriendsinNewJerseywereJUULaddicts.Althoughmany
ofthemarebelowthelegalagetopurchaseJUULproducts,theyeasilypurchased
JUULpodsfromlocalgasstationsandotherstudentsatM.H.’sschool.
169. Hellmanhasspentinexcessof$7,000inhereffortstohelpM.H.with
behavioralissuesthatcoincidedwhenM.H.beganJUULing.In2018,Hellmanmoved
thefamilytoPennsylvania,whereJUULuseisjustascommoninM.H.’snewhigh
school.M.H.hastriedcigarettesattimeswhereshecouldnotgetJUULpods.
170. HellmanhadtaughtM.H.andherbrotherthatsmokingwas
dangerous,butshedidnotknowtowarnthemabouttheJUUL—orwhataJUUL
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 34 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
35
was—untilitwastoolate.SchoolseducatedM.H.andherbrotherabouttobacco
thoughtheDAREprogram,butneveraddressedJUULuse.
171. ThoughM.H.wasnotasmokeroranicotineuserbeforeusingaJUUL,
hercurrentconsumptionofnicotineisconsistentandfrequent.
172. M.H.hastriedrepeatedlytoquitJUULusebuthasbeenunabletodo
so.
R. Austin Hester
173. PlaintiffAustinHester(“Hester”)livesinRoxboro,NorthCarolinabut
residedinSt.Louis,Missouriwhenthetransactionsbelowoccurred.
174. .PriortousingaJUULforthefirsttimein2016,attheageof20,
Hesterdidnotsmokeorusetobaccoproductsbecauseheknewthatcigarettes
causeaddictionandcanleadtoseriousillnessordeath.Healsofoundthesmellof
cigarettesmokenoxious.
175. AlthoughhehadnotyettriedaJUUL,HestersawandreliedonJUUL’s
point-of-sale(“POS”)promotionalmaterials,includingJUULsignsanddisplays.The
POSmaterialsHestersawpromotedJUUL’sfruit-anddessert-flavoredpods.Ifthe
materialsdisclosedtheexistenceorrisksofnicotineinJUUL’sproducts,Hesterdid
notseethem.TherepresentationsandomissionsinJUUL’sin-storepromotions
materiallyimpactedHester’sassessmentofthenature,risksandbenefitsofJUUL’s
products.
176. WhensomeofHester’sfriendsbackfromcollegeofferedhimaJUUL
inthesummerof2016,Hester,likehisJUUL-usingfriends,wasunawareofthe
addictionrisksJUULposed.HesterlikedthetasteoftheFruitMedleypodsand
continuedtoacceptpuffsfromhisfriendswhentheysocialized,whichusually
occurredafewtimesaweek.
177. Overthecourseofthesummer,Hestercontinuedtousehisfriends’
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 35 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
36
JUULwhenhewouldseethem.AndHestercontinuedtoseeJUULpromotionsin-
storeandonline.JUUL’suseofflavor-basednicotinepodsandJUUL’sflavor-based
advertisingimagesplayedasignificantroleinHester’sdecisiontouseandcontinue
usingaJUUL.HadheknownthatJUUL’s“FruitMedley”productposedariskof
fosteringalife-alteringaddiction,orcouldleadtosmoking,heneverwouldhave
usedorpurchasedaJUUL.
178. HesteralsosawJUULadvertisingcontenton@JUULvaporInstagram
accountandthroughtheaccountofthirdpartiesdiscussingorpromotingJUUL.
Hester’sfriendsandpeersalsopostedaboutJUULonInstagramandSnapchat.The
socialmediacontentHestersawledhimtobelievethatJUULproductsweremade
fornon-smokerslikehimandposedlittlerisk.
179. WhenHester’sfriendsreturnedtoschoolinthefallof2016,Hester
realizedthathehadbecomeaddictedtonicotineandpurchasedhisownJUUL
StarterKitfromthelocalQuikTripstore.
180. Hesterfilledouttheregistrationcardthatcameinhis“StarterPack”
andreturnedittoJUUL.Thereafter,Hesterroutinelyreceivedpromotionalemails,
which,duringthetimeperiodincludeddiscountoffers,storelocators,andflavor
promotions,fromJUUL,suchastheemailbelowpromotingJUUL’sMango:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 36 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
37
181. Hester’sbuddingaddictiontonicotinequicklyspiraledoutofcontrol,
andHesterwassoonconsumingthreeJUULpodsaday.
182. HestercurrentlyconsumesoneJUULpodaday.Hetakeshisfirstpuff
ofJUULwithin5minutesofwakingup.Hefindsthattheharshnessorthroathitof
theMintflavorpreventshimfromexcessivenicotineconsumption.
183. HestertriedtheMangopodsbutfoundthesmoothnessofthevapor,
coupledwiththeflavor,ledtoanunwantedspikeinusage.
S. Edgar Kalenkevich
184. PlaintiffEdgarKalenkevichisaresidentofBrooklyn,NewYork.When
heusedaJUULforthefirsttimein2015,attheageof25,hewasanon-smoker.He
hadtriedcigarettesbeforebutfoundthemdisgustingandroughonhisthroat.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 37 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
38
185. PlaintiffEdgarKalenkevichisaresidentofBrooklyn,NewYork.When
heusedaJUULforthefirsttimein2015,attheageof25,hewasanon-smoker.He
hadtriedcigarettesbeforebutfoundthemdisgustingandroughonhisthroat.
186. KalenkevichrecallsthattheJUULbrandappearedoutofnowherein
NewYorkCityinthesummerof2015.Suddenly,allofhisfriendshadJUULdevices
andsomeofhisfriendsspokeofattendingeventswherefreeJUULproductswere
distributed.KalenkevichrecallsseeinganinvitationtoaJUULmovieeventin2015
aswell,inwhichJUULpromisedfree“starterkit”toeachattendee.
187. AlthoughhehadnotasyetusedaJUUL,Kalenkevichhadseen
advertisementsfromJUUL’s“Vaporized”campaign.Thesecolorfuladsfeatured
fashionablydressedyoungpeoplestrikingplayfulorseductiveposesreminiscentof
popmusicidols,eitherwithJUULinhandornexttoanenlargedimageofaJUUL
device.Kalenkevichdidnotseeanywarningsaboutnicotineoraddictioninthese
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 38 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
39
ads.
188. PriortousingaJUUL,Kalenkevichhadalsoseenpoint-of-sale(“POS”)
promotionalmaterialsforJUULdevicesandproducts,includingsignsanddisplays.
KalenkevichdidnotseeanywarningsordisclosuresonthesePOSmaterialsabout
JUUL’snicotinelevelsoftherisksJUULposed.Instead,hesawclaimsthatJUUL
offered“intenselysatisfyingvapor”andpromotionsforfruit-anddessert-flavored
pods.TheserepresentationsandomissionsinJUUL’sinstorepromotionsmaterially
impactedKalenkevich’sassessmentofdessert-flavoredJUULhewouldlaterbe
offered.
189. KalenkevichalsoremembersseeingJUULadvertisementsonhis
mobilephonein2015.NoneoftheJUUL-relatedcontentKalenkevichsawonhis
phoneindicatedthattheJUULcontainednicotine,coulddelivermorenicotinethan
cigarettes,orposedatleastthesamerisksofaddictionascigarettes.
190. KalenkevichhadhisfirstJUULexperiencewhenhisfriendofferedhim
apuffinamovietheaterinthesummerof2015.KalenkevichenjoyedtheCrème
Bruleeflavorandthefeelingitgavehim.Althoughheknewsmokingtobe
dangerousandaddictive,hethoughtthatJUULwouldnotbedangerous,inpart
becausethecolorfulpodsandthesweet,candy-likeflavors.Kalenkevichwouldnot
haveusedatobacco-ormenthol-flavoredJUUL.
191. AftertryingaJUUL,KalenkevichvisitedJUUL’ssitewherehesawa
chartindicatingthattheJUULdeliveredabout20%lessnicotinethanacigarette.He
assumedthismeantthattheJUULwaslessaddictiveandlessdangerousthana
cigarette.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 39 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
40
192. StartinginJune2015,KalenkevishfrequentlyviewedJUUL’spostson
FacebookandInstagramJUUL’suseoffood-basednames,food-basedadvertising
images,andfood-basedflavorswasasubstantialcontributingfactorin
Kalenkevich’sdecisiontostartusingandcontinueusingaJUUL.JUUL’sfood-based
promotionsmisledKalenkevichaboutthenatureofJUUL’sproductsanddistorted
therisksJUUL’sproductsposed.ButforJUUL'sflavoringsandflavor-based
promotions,KalenkevichwouldnothavestartedusingaJUULorwouldnothave
continuedusingaJUUL.
193. OnFacebook,hesawpostsencouraginghimto“startyourweekwith
CoolMintJUULpods”aswellaspromotionsforMangopodsandotherJUULflavors.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 40 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
41
194. WhenKalenkevich’sfriendsbeganpostingorre-postingsocialmedia
contentrelatedtoJUUL,KalenkevichstartedfollowingsomeoftheJUUL-related
accounts,including@[email protected],andother,
accountsKalenkevichsawnumerousJUUL-relatedpostsfeaturingpopularcartoon
characters,teenagersusingJUULdevices,teenscombiningJUULwithcigarettes,and
JUULasanessential–indeedirresistible–elementofyoungadultlife.
195. JUUL’suseofcelebritieslikeKatyPerryandOrlandoBloomalso
influencedhisdecisiontouseJUULproducts.Thesecelebrities’endorsementled
himtobelievethatJUULwasasafeproduct.
196. KalenkevichvisitedJUUL’swebsitein2015and2016andbegan
receivingpromotionalemailsfromJUUL.Nothinginthoseemailsdisclosedthat
JUULcontainedatleast59mg/mLnicotineorthattheJUULcoulddelivermore
nicotineperpuffthanacigarette.
197. Kalenkevich’sJUULusecausedhimtobecomeaddictedtonicotine.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 41 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
42
Thoughcigaretteshaddisgustedhiminthepast,hisaddictiontonicotinewasso
intensethathestartedsmokingwhenhedidnothaveaccesstoJUUL.Likemany
non-smokerswhoareintroducedtonicotinethroughJUUL,Kalenkevichbecamea
userofmultipletobaccoproducts.
198. Kalenkevichnowsmokestencigarettesandvapesatleasthalfofa
CoolMintorMangopodaday.Inhisexperience,thesweeterflavorsgeneratemore
vaporandaresmootheronthethroat.
199. ButforJUUL’sdeceptiveandunfairpromotionalpractices,
KalenkevichwouldhaveneverusedaJUULandwouldhaveneverbecomeasmoker.
T. David Kugler
200. PlaintiffDavidKuglerisaresidentofIllinois.
201. Davidis18yearsold,heturned18inJanuary2019.
202. David.isaddictedtoJUUL,hestartedatage15inthesummerof2016;
Hehadtriedacigarettebefore.
203. JUULseemedtrendyorcooland“everyonewasdoingit”sohetried
too.
204. DavidKuglerhasseenJUULadsonsocialmedia,instagram,atgas
stations,andsmokeshopsduringtheclassperiod,includingthisadandsimilarads,
whichprovidenowarning:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 42 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
43
205. DavidKuglerfirsttriedJUULatapartyandoneofhisclassmates
offeredhimtotryusingaJUULdeviceandJUULpodthatwas“CoolMint”flavor.D.K.
didknowwhatnicotinewasanddidnottrynicotinebeforethatpoint.Therewere
nowarningsonthedeviceorpod.
206. IfDavidKugler.hadknownhowaddictiveJUULwasorhowitworked,
hewoulddefinitelynottryit.Atpeakusein2017,D.K.wassmokingapackofpods
or$20-$25perweek.
207. DavidKuglerwasconsistentlystrugglingwithaddictionand
withdrawltoJUUL,andithurthisrelationshipwithhisparents.
208. DavidprefersflavoredJUULpods,includingmango.D.K.avoids
tobaccoormentholflavoredJUULpods.
209. DavidwouldneverhaveusedJUULhaditnotbeenfortheflavors.
210. DavidhadseenJUUL’spackagingandadvertisementsingasstations
andonsocialmedia.
211. David’smotherTracieKuglerdoesnotsleepanymorebecauseofher
sons’condition.
212. DavidsawonlineadsforJUULskinsandsaw@juulnationon
instagram.Whenmangofirstcameout,hesawalotofsocialmediapromotionover
newappealingflavors.Hehasseenmanymemessuchaspeopleinhalingmultiple
JUULsatonce.Hesawalotofonlinememes.
213. Davidsawaphotoof,BakerMayfieldtheNFLquarterback,posteda
photowithaJUULdevide.
214. DavidpurchasedJUULfromaclassmatewhopurchasedpodsinbulk
offoftheJUULwebsite.HealsopurchasedJUULpodsthroughgasstationsand
smokeshopsandthroughthehelpofsomeofhisclassmateswholookedolder.
215. Davidlostweight(11lbs)andvisitedaphysician,whorecognizedthat
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 43 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
44
nothingwaswrongwithhimexceptforhisnicotineaddiction.
216. David’snicotineaddictionhascontributedtohisslowerathletic
performanceandhasnowdiminishedhisopportunitiestoplaycollegesoccer.
217. Davidhadreceivedhelpfromacounselorandwaseventuallyableto
recoverfromhisaddictioninthesummerof2017.Thisprogramcostapproximately
$2,000.
218. DavidwouldneverhaveusedJUULhaditnotbeenforflavorsand
marketingthatmadehimbelieveJUULwassafe.
U. Tracie Kugler, on behalf of her son, Z.K, a minor.
219. Kugler and Z.K. are residents of Illinois.
220. Z.K.,Kugler’sson,is15yearsold.
221. Z.K.isaddictedtoJUUL.Z.K.startedatage14in2017.
222. Z.K.hadevertriedacigarettebeforetryingJUUL.
223. Z.K.sawJUULadsonFacebookadvertisingJUUL’snewestflavor,
mango.Hespecificallysawthisadinearly2017beforehestartedsmokingJUUL,
whichdoesnotwarnofanydangersofusingJUUL,orthenatureofnicotinecontent
anddeliveryinthedevice:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 44 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
45
224. WhenZ.K.firsttriedJUUL,itwascleartohimthatheonlyliked
flavoredJUULpods,includingmango.
225. Z.K.avoidstobaccoormentholflavoredJUULpods,findingthem
“digusting”.
226. Z.K.becameaddictedtoJUULin2017hasbeencaughtusingJUULat
schoolmultipletimesinthepastseveralyears.
227. Z.K.purchasesJUULonaregularbasisthroughotherpeoplewho
obtainitfromgasstations,online,orretailers.
228. Z.K.hasseenJUUL’spackagingandadvertisementsingasstationsand
onsocialmedia.Hedidseethe5%nicotinestrengthaswell.Noneoftheadshesaw,
includingspecificallytheonebelow,warnedZ.K.ofthetrueharmsandnatureof
JUUL:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 45 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
46
229. PlaintiffKuglerdoesnotsleepanymorebecauseofZ.K.’scondition.
230. Z.K.hasbeencaughtusingJUULthreetimesinschool.Hehas
performedpoorlyinschoolduetohisaddiction,andhadtobeputinadrugrehab
programmandatedbytheschool.
231. Z.K.wasalsocaughtusingJUULinasummerschoolprogram,after
whichhewasplacedinanoutpatientrehabfacilitythatcostatleast$4,000and
therapythatcost$160persessionwithapproximately25visits.Z.K.continuedto
useJUULthroughtheprogramduetohisaddiction.
232. Z.K.’smoodhassignificantlychangedandhisnicotineaddictionhas
contributedtoanxietyanddepression.
233. Z.K.’saddictionhascontributedtonegativeimpactsonhisnegative
health,andconflictswithparentsandothers.
234. Z.K.wouldneverhaveusedJUULhaditnotbeenfortheflavors.
V. Kacie Ann Lagun (née Durham)
235. PlaintiffKacieAnnLagun(néeDurham)isaresidentofPennsylvania.
236. LagunisaU.S.Armyveteranandhealthsciencesstudent.
237. LagunpurchasedaJUULtohelpherquitsmokingandasahealthy
alternativetosmoking.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 46 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
47
238. LagunsawJUULadvertisementswhenshewenttopurchase
cigarettes,whichledhertogototheJUULwebsiteformoreinformation.Theseads
includeddiscounts,andadvertisedtoswitchtoJUUL.Shealsosawpointofsale
displaysforJUUL,presentingavarietyofflavors,eachwithitsownbrightprimary
color.Samplesofsuchadsareshownbelow:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 47 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
48
239. OnDefendant’swebsite,shesawtheJUULasasleek,portabledevice
withavarietyofappealingflavors,particularlymenthol.Thedeviceswere
advertisedusingbright,primarycolorsinadssuchastheonebelow:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 48 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
49
240. LagundidnotknowatthetimeshepurchasedtheJUULthat
JUULpodsdelivermorenicotinethanaregularcigarette.
241. LagunisnowaddictedtoJUULpods.
242. HadLagunknownthatJUULpodsweremoreaddictivethancigarettes,
shewouldnothavepurchasedthem.
W. David Langan
243. PlaintiffDavidLanganisaresidentofMassachusetts.
244. Langan,whoisnow24yearsold,boughthisfirstJUULfromafriend.
Langanhadbeensmoking4-5yearsbeforehepurchasedhisfirstJUULandhad
unsuccessfullytriedtoquitafewtimes.Heparticularlywantedtoquitsmoking
becausehehadachildontheway,anddidnotwanttosmokearoundhispregnant
wifeorinfant.
245. Hefeltlikehehadalmostquitcigaretteswhenafriendintroduced
himtoJUULpodsinoraboutMarch2017.Shortlyafterwards,hepurchasedhis
JUUL.
246. LanganhadseenadsfromJUUL’s“Switch”campaignpriortohis
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 49 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
50
purchase.Healsoremembersseeingtheslogan“SmokingEvolved.”
247. LanganremembersJUULcomingoutofnowhere,andsuddenlybeing
everywhere,bothinsocialmediaads,gasstation/pointofsaleadsanddisplays,and
beingusedbyfriends,aswellasmanyhighschoolstudentsinhisneighborhood.He
remembersJUULadvertisingbeingsowidespreaditbecamepartofthe
subconsciousbackdropofhiseverydaylife.
248. AtthetimeofhisearlyJUULpurchases,Langanwasactiveon
InstagramandFacebook.HeviewedInstagram“Switch”clipswhereJUULusers
talkedabouttheirexperiencesswitchingtoJUUL.
249. Langan’sfirststorepurchaseofJUULpodswasapackoftheCoolMint
flavoredpods,whichwastriggeredbyaposteradvertisingtheCoolMintflavorat
hislocalgasstation.Langansawadvertisingmaterialsdescribingthefruityand
mentholflavorsofJUULpods,whichinfluencedhispurchase.LanganfavorsMenthol
JUULpods,andhasalsopurchasedMango-flavoredandCoolMintJUULpodsthat
wereadvertised.
250. LanganalsoreceivedadspromotingJUULfromhislocalsmokeshop,
intheformoftextmessages.
251. BasedonwhatLanganhadheardandseen,hewasunderthe
impressionthatJUULwashealthierthancigarettes.Hewasalsounderthe
impressionthatJUULpodswerenotonlynomoreaddictivethancigarettes,but
wereactuallyusefulasameansofweaninghimselffromnicotine.Hedidnotknow
thatJUULpodsactuallycontainedahigher,morepotentdoseofnicotinethan
cigarettes,orthatJUULusewouldaggravatehisnicotineaddiction.
252. Subsequently,hefoundthathisnicotineadditionincreased
significantly.WhenLanganlosthisfirstJUUL,hecouldnotgowithoutone,sohe
boughtareplacement.LanganalsofoundthatifhedidnothaveaworkingJUULon
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 50 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
51
him,hefeltcompelledtoaskforcigarettesfromsmokersaroundhim.HadLangan
knownthatthenicotinesaltsinJUULpodsweremorepotentandaddictivethan
traditionalcigarettes,hewouldnothavepurchasedJUULproducts.
253. IfLanganhadknownthetruthofJUULpods’nicotinecontentand
addictiveness,hewouldnothavepurchasedtheproducts.
X. Plaintiff Jonathan Mardis
254. PlaintiffJonathanMardisisatwenty-fouryearoldresidentof
Mississippi.
255. Plaintiff started using JUUL products in mid-2018. He learned about
JUUL from Facebook ads including those contained in JUUL’s marketing led plaintiff to
believe that using JUUL was healthier than smoking cigarettes.
256. Plaintiff purchased JUUL from Citco, a convenience store, for
approximately $17 for a pack. He did not see any warnings on the JUUL ads and posters
in the gas station, including the ads that said “JUUL was sold here” in gas stations in his
area.
257. Plaintiff also saw JUUL content on Snapchat and Facebook, including the
images presented at the page http://www.classlawdc.com/2019/01/25/juul-images-2/.
258. He used to smoke approximately 20 cigarettes every two days, and
smoked for 6.5 years before trying JUUL. Now Mardis is smoking a full JUUL pod per
day and still craving cigarettes.
259. He smokes approximately 1.5 JUULpods per day and starts consuming
these as soon as he wakes up.
260. On occasion Plaintiff gets bad headaches when he uses JUUL and other
consequences. He has spent a significant amount of money on JUUL and cannot kick his
addiction.
261. Plaintiff only purchased JUUL because he thought it would help him end
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 51 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
52
his addiction, but instead, his addiction has gotten worse. He would have never purchased
JUUL has he known the truth about the nature of its nicotine content, delivery, and the
harms that it poses.
Y. M.C. through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeannine Manning
262. PlaintiffM.C.andhisParentandNaturalGuardianJeannineManning
(“Manning”)areresidentsofWalpole,Massachusetts.
263. WhenM.C.usedaJUULforthefirsttimein2016,attheageof14,he
wasnotasmokerandhadneverusedtobaccoproducts.
264. PriortohisfirstexperiencewithaJUUL,M.C.hadseenadvertisements
fromJUUL’s“Vaporized”campaign.OneoftheadsM.C.sawportrayedanattractive
youngwomanwithbleachedhair,elevatedboots,rippedjeans,adistresseddenim
jacketandaJUULdeviceinherhand.M.C.didnotseeanydisclosuresorwarnings
aboutnicotineoraddictionintheseadvertisements.
265. PriortousingaJUUL,M.C.hadalsoseenpoint-of-sale(“POS”)
promotionalmaterialsforJUULdevicesandproducts,includingsignsanddisplays.
M.C.didnotseeanywarningsordisclosuresinthesePOSmaterialsaboutthe
existenceoramountofnicotineinaJUULortherisksnicotineposed.Instead,he
sawpromotionsforJUUL’sfruit-anddessert-flavoredpods.Therepresentations
andomissionsinJUUL’sin-storepromotionsmateriallyimpactedM.C.’sassessment
oftheJUULhewouldlaterbeofferedbyafriendatschool.
266. Thoughhewasnotasmoker,whenM.C.’sclassmateofferedhimhis
firstpuffofaJUUL,M.C.accepteditbecausehethoughtitwouldbesafeand
harmless.
267. M.C.didnotknowthatJUULvaporcontainsnicotineandpresentsa
riskofaddiction.Tothisday,thoughheisaddictedtonicotine,M.C.thinksthat
JUULuseis“ok”and“safe.”
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 52 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
53
268. JUUL’suseoffood-basednames,food-basedadvertisingimages,and
food-basedflavorsplayedasubstantialcontributingfactortoM.C.’sdecisiontostart
usingandcontinueusingaJUUL.JUUL’sfood-basedpromotionsmisledM.C.about
thenatureofJUUL’sproductanddistortedtherisksJUULproductsposed.Butfor
JUUL'sflavoringsandflavor-basedpromotions,M.C.wouldnothaveusedaJUULor
wouldnothavecontinuedusingaJUUL.
269. JUUL’smethodsofpromotingitsproductsonsocialmediaplatforms
foreseeablytriggeredtheviralspreadofJUUL-promotionalcontentthatencouraged
teenstotakeupJUULuse,promoteddrug-likebehaviors,distortedandomittedthe
risksofJUULuse,andmisledyouthaboutthenatureandrisksofJUULuse.These
promotionsreachedM.C.andM.C.’ssocialnetworkandwereintendedtopromote
theJUULbrandandproductstoyouth.ButforJUUL’ssocialmediaadvertising,M.C.
wouldnothavebeenexposedtoandwouldnothaveusedaJUUL.
270. M.C.andhisfriendsareactiveonInstagramandSnapchatandfollowa
numberofJUUL-promotingaccounts.Throughtheseaccounts,M.C.hasseen
contentthatencouragesteenageJUULusebydepictingteensusingJUUL,depicting
“cool”culturaliconsusingJUULandmakinglightofteendependenceonJUUL.M.C.
andhisfriendsnowpostvideosofthemselvesJUULingonSnapChatthataresimilar
tothevideosandimagestheyseeonInstagram.
271. M.C.andhisfriendspurchaseJUULproductsthroughclassmateswhen
theycannotpurchasethemthroughstoresoronline.ManningknowsthatM.C.has
atleastoncepurchasedJUULproductsonlineusingaVisagiftcardthathe
purchasedwithcash.ButManningdoesnotknowifM.C.boughtthemfromJUULor
fromaJUULreseller.Morerecently,M.C.admittedtohavingpurchasedaJUUL
deviceand20podsfromastrangerhemetonSnapchat.
272. Likemanyofhisfriendsandclassmates,M.C.supportshisJUUL
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 53 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
54
addictionbysellingJUULpodstoclassmatesatamarkup.
273. Todate,Manninghasconfiscatedatleast5JUULdevicesfromM.C.
Eachtimeshedoesso,M.C.becomesextremelyirritable,belligerentandverbally
abusiveduetonicotinewithdrawal.SincehestartedusingaJUUL,M.C.’shealthand
performanceinschoolhavesuffered,withM.C.beingmorewithdrawnandmoody
thanhewasbeforehebecameaddictedtonicotine.
274. MC’sphysicianhasnotbeenabletohelpMCbreakhisaddiction.MC
nowseesacounselorbecauseManningfoundthathewasvapingmarijuanaoil
throughhisJUULdevice.Todate,Manninghasspentinexcessof$1150on
interventionstoaddressM.C.’sJUULaddiction,butwithoutsuccess.
275. M.C.currentlyconsumesatleast1fruit-flavoredJUULpod(either
FruitMedleyorMango)perday.
Z. David Masessa
276. PlaintiffDavidMasessaisanadultcitizenofNewJerseyandresidesin
Chatham,NJ.
277. In2015,Mr.MasessabeganusingJUULproductsinanefforttocease
smokingcigarettesandweanhimselffromnicotineconsumption.Hehadbeen
smokingfromonehalfofapacktoapackofcigaretteseachday.Hebelievedthe
JUULpodswouldquenchhisdesirefornicotine,allowhimtostopsmokingand
usinge-cigarettes,andallowhimtoceaseconsumingallnicotineproducts
altogether.
278. PriortoconsumingJUULpods,Mr.Masessawasexposed to and did see
JUUL advertising, promotional and marketing materials in various online publications
(such as Wired, Verge and Engadget), which caused him to believe that JUUL products
would allow him to wean himself off of cigarettes and nicotine products. These materials
sometimes included the word “Vaporized” and always featured attractive, youthful-
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 54 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
55
looing models, including specifically the following:
279. Prior to consuming JUUL pods, he visited the JUUL website in June 2015,
where he saw claims and representations about the product. He relied on those claims
and representations when he then purchased the JUUL starter kit from the JUUL website.
Such claims include the following graph, implying that JUUL contains less nicotine than
cigarettes:
280. At around this time, Mr. Masessa also saw posts on JUUL’s Facebook
page, including the following ad:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 55 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
56
281. After June 2015 when he purchased the JUUL started kit, he visited or
came across additional posts from JUUL’s facebook page, including a post that pictured a
JUUL crème brulee-flavored pod next to a real crème brulee with the words “this
JUULpod lets you indulge in dessert without the spoon”, and a post with the word
“SWITCH” in large letters across the face of the post along with the words “JUUL was
designed with smokers in mind. Have you made the switch?”
282. After June 2015, he also saw advertisements on social media for rooftop
JUUL parties in Brooklyn and Manhattan, which further enticed him to begin using and
to continue to use JUUL products. He saw the following ad and several others that were
similar:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 56 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
57
283. He saw JUUL’s representation of “5% strength” on JUUL packaging and
believed that this meant the product contained 5% nicotine.
284. After June 2015, he also saw JUUL’s representation that one JUULpod is
equivalent to one pack of cigarettes and believed this to mean that one JUULpod has a
nicotine content equivalent to one pack of cigarettes.
285. He also saw JUUL’s representation that JUUL products were an
“alternative for adult smokers” and believed this to mean that JUUL products were a
smoking-cessation device that was a healthier alternative to cigarettes. Although he
ultimately reduced, but did not cease, his consumption of cigarettes, he became addicted
to JUULpods, which increased his anxiety and desire for nicotine. He experienced strong
withdrawal symptoms when he did not use JUUL.
286. He relied on these representations in deciding to use JUUL and in
continuing to use JUUL.
287. From the JUUL marketing materials and representations that he saw, he
did not know that the JUUL contained 59mg/mL nicotine (6%); that the JUUL could
deliver more nicotine per puff than a cigarette; or that the nicotine delivered by the JUUL
entered the bloodstream faster than a cigarette. He believed that the nicotine salts in the
JUUL broke down in the blood over a longer period of time than nicotine inhaled through
a cigarette, and that this was supposed to reduce his desire for nicotine.
288. He purchased JUUL products at convenience stores and local smoke shops
near where he lives. At those stores and in other locations, he saw JUUL advertisements
and in-store signs, promotional materials, sales and discount information, and poster-
sized enlargements of the product packaging. He saw several displays including the
following display, none of which warned him of the truth of JUUL’s nicotine content and
delivery:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 57 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
58
289. He has tried all of the JUUL flavors. He had seen JUUL advertisements
touting all of the flavors it offered before trying those flavors, including advertisements
that pictured real fruit next to the corresponding JUUL flavor, such as ripe mangoes next
to a picture of the mango-flavored JUUL pod, crème brulee-flavored JUUL pods next to
a cup of coffee as if those pods were a sweet dessert, and sliced cucumber next to the
cucumber-flavored JUUL pod. His favorite flavor is Crème Brulee because it causes him
the least amount of irritation and inflammation of his throat and mouth.
290. Mr. Masessa on average consumed four to six JUUL pods every week.
291. Since starting to consume JUUL pods, Mr. Masessa became addicted to
the nicotine salts they contain. Indeed, JUULing was on his mind more than smoking
cigarettes was, and not having a JUUL nearby caused him anxiety. Rather than weaning
Mr. Masessa off of cigarettes and nicotine, the JUUL products delivered a high dose of
nicotine that resulted in an increased nicotine addiction, an increased consumption of
nicotine, and an increase in the number of JUUL products he consumed.
292. Mr. Masessa would not have purchased JUUL products had he known that
the nicotine salts in JUUL pods were highly addictive and more potent and addictive than
the traditional cigarettes from which he was attempting to wean himself.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 58 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
59
AA. Ron Minas
293. RonMinas("Minas")isaresidentofLebanon,Connecticut.
294. PriortousingJUUL,Minassmokedabouttento20cigarettesdaily.
295. MinasfirstlearnedaboutJUULfromhisbrother.HelatersawJUUL
advertisementsonlineanddecidedtobuyaJUULdevice.HehopedthattheJUUL
wouldhelphimstopsmokingandbreakhisaddictiontonicotine.
296. Minasfirstpurchasedmango-flavoredJUULpods.Minaswouldnot
haveusedtobacco-ormenthol-flavoredJUUL.
297. BeforepurchasingJUUL,MinasvisitedJUUL’swebsiteandbegan
receivingpromotionalemailsfromJUUL.NeitherJUUL’swebsitenorJUUL’semails
disclosedthattheJUULeasilydeliversmorenicotineperpuffthanacigaretteorthat
theJUULdeliversnicotinetothebloodstreamfasterthanacigarette.
298. Minas'nicotineconsumptionhasincreasedsinceheswitchedtoJUUL.
MinasnowconsumesatleastoneJUULpodperday,sometimesmore.
299. MinasbelievesthatusingJUULhasonlyworsenedhisnicotine
addiction,ashecanconsumeJUULanywhere;theJUULdeviceisconstantlyinhis
hand.
300. NothingonJUUL’slabelingsuggestedtoMinasthatthenicotinelevels
ofaJUULwouldexceedthoseofacigarette.MinaswouldnothavepurchasedJUUL
productsifhehadknownthattheJUULdeliveredmorenicotinethancigarettesand
posedariskofworseninghisaddictiontonicotine.
301. Minas'sJUULusehasalsoimpactedhisfamily.Minasoncecaughthis
11-year-oldsoninhalinghismango-flavoredJUULpods.Luckily,Minaswasableto
stophissonbeforehebecameaddictedtonicotine,butthesituationcouldhave
turnedoutverydifferently.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 59 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
60
302. MinassayshehastriedtostopusingJUUL,buthejustcannotkickhis
nicotineaddiction.Minashastriedtouseanicotinepatchandreceivedtreatmentat
theV.A.,asheisaveteran,buthecannotseemtoshakeit.
303. IfMinashadknownhowmuchnicotineJUULpodscontained,he
wouldneverhavestartedusingtheproductandexposedhimselftotheriskof
developingamoreseriousnicotineaddiction.
BB. L.B., and her mother and natural guardian Jill Nelson
304. L.B.andhermotherandnaturalguardianJillNelsonare,andatall
timesrelevantheretowereresidentsofSanDiego,SanDiegoCounty,California.
305. L.B.wasintroducedtoJUULproductsbyherfriendsatschoolwhen
shewasintheeighthgrade.TheJUULdevicebearsnowarninglabelsaboutnicotine
orcontent,andL.B.’sfriendsdidnotwarnofheroftherisksofJUULuse.HadL.B.
known,orunderstood,therisksthattheJUULposed,shewouldneverhaveusedit.
306. L.B.wouldnothavetriedaJUULbutforthefruitflavorsofferedtoher
byherfriends.ThefruitflavoredJUULproductherfriendsofferedherledL.B.to
believethattheproductwassafetouse.Shedidnotknowshewasingesting
nicotinefromanicotinedeliverysystemthatdeliveredasmuch—ormore—nicotine
thanacigarette.Sheknewnottosmokebutdidnotunderstandtherisksof
ingestingnicotinefromENDS.
307. Throughheruseofherfriends’JUULs,L.B.becameaddictedto
nicotineandeventuallypurchasedaJUULofherownfromanunknownsource.
308. L.B.hasreportedtoNelsonthatJUULuseiscommonatherhigh
school,whereolderstudentssellindividualpodstoyoungerstudentsforprofit.
309. L.B.toldNelsonthatthelocalgasstationsreadilysellJUULpodsto
minorsandthatoneyounggasstationemployeeeventradesJUULpodsforfastfood
thatchildrenbringhim.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 60 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
61
310. Onatleastoneoccasion,NelsonknowsofL.B.purchasingJUULpods
fromeBay.
311. InOctober2017,L.B.alsoobtainedadevicedirectlyfromJUUL
throughthecompany’swarrantydepartment.
312. L.B.alsoreceivedpromotionalemailsfromJUUL,startingnolater
thanOctober2017.
313. NelsonisunsurehowmuchL.B.usesherJUULbutsheconstantly
findstheorangeandgreencapsofmangoand“Cool”MintJUULpodsinL.B.’sroom.
NelsonhastalkedtoL.B.’sdoctorandothermedicalproviders.Noneofthemare
trained,orequipped,totreatadolescentswithsevereaddictionstonicotinecaused
byJUULproducts.
314. SincethefilingoftheFirstAmendedComplaint,L.B.hasbeensubject
todisciplinaryactionsatschoolfortruancyrelatingtoJUULusageandwasputina
court-orderedprogramcalledDiversionasaresult.
315. InOctober,NelsontookawayL.B.’ssmartphonefordisciplinary
reasons.Indoingso,shealsoremovedL.B.’saccesstohernetworkoffriendswho
arealsoaddictedtoJUUL.L.B.’sangerandpaniccausedhertofleethehouseand
L.B.wasapprehendedforerraticbehaviorinpublicbythepolice.
316. NelsonandL.B.’sfatherputL.B.inaone-month-longinpatient
treatmentprogram.
317. Thedayaftershereturnedfromtreatment,L.B.acquiredanother
JUUL.ShecontinuestoJUULdaily.
318. Becauseofherextendedabsencefromschool,L.B.isunableto
completeherfreshmanyearofhighschoolwithherclassmates.Shenowattendsan
alternativeschoolandisattemptingtosalvageheryear.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 61 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
62
CC. S.G., a Minor, through her Parent and Natural Guardian Ashley Noble
319. S.G.andherparentandNaturalGuardianAshleyNobleareresidents
ofOceanSprings,Mississippi.
320. WhenS.G.beganusinge-cigarettesin2017,attheageof14,shewas
notasmoker.NordidsheunderstandtherisksofENDSoraddiction.
321. In2018,JUULingbecameverypopularatS.G.’shighschool.When
offeredafruit-flavoredJUUL,shefoundthatshelikedtheflavorandthefactthatit
gaveherafarstronger“buzz”thanherolderbrother’s1.8%nicotineENDSshehad
usedinthepast.
322. JUUL’suseofflavorsplayedasubstantialcontributingfactorinS.G.’s
decisiontotakeupandcontinueusingaJUUL.ButforJUUL'sdessert-andfruit-
basednicotineflavors,andJUUL’spromotionofthoseflavors,S.G.wouldnothave
usedaJUUL.
323. ThoughS.G.hadusedENDSinthepast,afterherfirstJUULexperience,
S.G.developedanuncontrollableaddictiontonicotine,consumingupto2JUULpods
adayineither“Cool”MintorMangoflavor.
324. BecauseS.G.hadusedENDSbeforeusingaJUUL,shereadand
understoodJUUL’slabelingstatementof“5%strength”tomean5%nicotineby
volume.S.G.didnotknowthatJUULcontainedatleast5.9%nicotine—more
thanthreetimesthepotencyofthesolutionshehadusedbefore—orthatJUUL’s
Mintpodshadbeenfoundtocontainupto9.4%nicotine.JUUL’smisleadinglabels
alsomadeitdifficultforS.G.tofindalternativeENDStoJUULorunderstandwhat
lowerpotencyproductsmightexist.
325. SincebecomingtakingupaJUUL,S.G.hasdevelopedbehavioral
problemslinkedtoheraddiction.
326. Noblehaspurchasedurinecotininescreens,nicotinepatches,
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 62 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
63
andnicotinegumaspartofhereffortstounderstandandassistS.G.withher
addiction.InadditiontotryingtohelpS.G.weanherselfoffofnicotine,Noblehas
soughtprofessionaltreatmenttonoavail.NoblerecentlytookawayS.G.’sJUUL.The
resultingnicotinewithdrawalpromptedS.G.tobeginsmokingcigarettes,whichshe
couldaccessmoreeasilythananewJUUL.
327. PriortousingaJUUL,S.G.hadseenpoint-of-sale(“POS”)promotional
materialsforJUULdevicesandproducts,includingsignsanddisplays.S.G.didnot
seeanywarningsordisclosuresaboutJUUL’snicotinelevelsortherisksaJUUL
posedonthosePOSmaterialsandinsteadsawpromotionsforJUUL’sfruit-and
dessert-flavoredpods.TherepresentationsandomissionsS.G.sawJUUL’sin-store
materiallyimpactedS.G.’sassessmentofthefruit-flavoredJUULshewouldbe
offeredbyafriendatschool.
328. SocialmediadrovethepopularityofJUULatS.G.’shighschool.Both
beforeandaftertakingupJUULuse,S.G.sawasignificantamountofJUUL-
promotionalcontentthatencouragedteenstotakeupJUULuse,promoteddrug-like
behaviorswithJUULproducts,distortedandomittedtherisksofJUULuse,and
omittedordownplayedthenatureandrisksofJUULuse.Thesepromotions
includingreachedS.G.andS.G.’ssocialnetwork,includingclassmates,leadingtoan
increaseinuptakeonJUULproductsandwidespreadmisperceptionsaboutthe
natureandrisksofJUULproducts.S.G.hasseenviralmediacontentthatnormalizes
theroleofJUULinteenlifeby,amongotherthings,portrayingteensusingJUUL,
portrayingteensdressedinJUUL-themedcostumes,depictingJUULasanelementof
a“highschoolstarterpack”andgivinghumoroustreatmenttoteendependenceon
JUULproducts.ButforJUUL’sviralmarketingactivity,S.G.wouldnothavebeen
exposedtoandwouldnothaveusedaJUUL.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 63 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
64
329. S.G.isveryactiveonInstagramwhereshefollowedtheaccount
“@Doit4Juul”and“@JUULnation.”S.G.routinelysawpromotedimagesof
adolescentsherageusingJUULproductsandbelievedthatJUULingwasthecool
thingtodoandwouldhelpherfitinwithherpeers.
330. OnSnapChat,S.G.hasseencontentfromtheJUULinfluencers
DonnySmokesandSupremePatty.S.G.andherfriendsandclassmatesmimicthe
mannerismsandtechniquestheyobservecopyingthetricksandcontent.Ineffect,
theyareimitatingwithintheirsocialcirclestheactivitytheyseeon“DoIt4Juul,”and
similarsocialmediaaccounts.ThroughSnapChat,S.G.canalsoreadily
purchaseJUULpodsfromclassmatesorotherpeers.
331. S.G.currentlyconsumesatleastoneCrèmeBruleeJUULpodadayand
smokescigaretteswhenshecannotuseaJUUL.
DD. D.O. through her mother and natural guardian Atoyia Orders
332. D.O.andhismotherandnaturalguardianAtoyiaOrders(“Orders”)
areresidentsofLondon,Ohio.
333. D.O.beganusingJUULaroundJune2016,attheageof16.
334. WhenD.O.wasofferedaJUULbyafriendatschool,hehadnever
smokedorusedanyothertobaccoproduct;hedecidedtotryaJUULbecausethe
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 64 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
65
mintflavorsoundedappealing,hebelievedtheJUULposednoseriousrisks,and
JUULinghadgrownincreasinglycommonathisschool.D.O.hadseen
advertisementsforJUULonsocialmediaandwasled.tobelieveJUULdidnot
containanynicotine.
335. BeforeD.O.eventriedJUUL,healsoviewedpoint-of-sale(“POS”)
promotionalmaterialsforJUULdevicesandproducts,includingsignsanddisplays.
ThesepromotionalmaterialsfeaturedimagesofJUUL’smulticoloredfruit-flavored
pods.D.O.didnotseeanywarningsordisclosuresinthesePOSmaterialsabout
JUUL’snicotinelevelsortherisksJUULposed.Therepresentationsandomissionsin
JUUL’sin-storepromotionsmateriallyimpactedD.O.’sassessmentof,andeventual
decisiontouse,JUULproducts.
336. D.O.toldOrdersthatsmokingJUULwas“smoothandeasy”andeased
hisanxiety.
337. Shortlyaftertryinghisfriend’sJUULatschool,D.O.purchasedaJUUL
“starterpack”fromalocalgasstationandconsumedalltheJUULpodscontained
therein.
338. D.O.nowconsumestwoorthreeJUULpodseachday.
339. D.O.attemptedtoquitusingJUUL.However,becausehewashighly
addictedtonicotine,D.O.turnedtocigarettes.Now,D.O.usesJUULandcigarettes.
340. OrderssaysD.O.’sJUULusehashadsignificantphysical,financial,and
socialeffectsonherson.D.O.hashisJUULinhand“24/7”andbecomesveryfidgety
andirritatedwhenhecannotuseJUUL.D.O.hasalsolostasignificantamountof
weightsincehestartedusingJUUL.
341. Financially,D.O.’sJUULuseconsumesalargeportionofhisbudget,as
hespendsasignificantamountofmoneyonJUULpodseachweek.D.O.nowworksto
feedhisnicotineaddiction,butbeforehestartedworking,hewouldstealmoney
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 65 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
66
fromhismotherinordertopurchaseJUULpods.
342. Socially,Orderssayshersonnowhangsoutwiththe“wrongcrowd,”
ashespendsmostofhistimewithfriendsthatalsouseJUULincessantly.
343. OrdersisconfidentthatD.O.wouldnothavestartedusingJUULifhe
hadknownthatJUULcontainednicotineandputhimataseriousriskofdeveloping
adebilitatingnicotineaddiction.
EE. Jack Roberts
344. PlaintiffJackRobertsisaresidentofKentucky.
345. BeforeRobertsusedaJUULforthefirstinNovember2017,attheage
of17,hehadseennumerousJUULdisplays,signsandpromotionsinlocalgas
stations.ThesematerialspromotedJUUL’sflavors,JUUL’sdiscountedStarterKits,
and“LimitedEdition”JUULflavorsanddevices.Robertsdoesnotrecallseeingany
disclosuresorwarningsonthosepromotionalmaterialsincludingdisclosuresor
warningsthattheJUULwasanage-restrictedproduct,coulddeliverlargerdosesof
nicotinethanacigarette,andwasatleastaspharmacokineticallypotentasa
cigarette.
346. WhenRobertswasofferedaJUULbyafriendatschool,hehadnever
smokedorusedanyothertobaccoproduct.HedecidedtotryaJUULbecausethe
CoolMintflavorsoundedappealing,hebelievedtheJUULposednoseriousrisks,
andJUULinghadgrownincreasinglycommonathisschool.Robertswouldnothave
usedatobaccoormenthol-flavoredJUULbecauseheassociatesbothofthoseflavors
withcigarettes,whichheknewtoavoid.
347. TheJUUL’snarcoticeffectofnicotineandthepeerreinforcement
accompanyingitledRobertstousehisfriend’sJUULrepeatedlyoverthecourseof
thenextfewweeks.Decidingthathewantedtotrydifferentflavors,Robertsbought
hisownJUUL“StarterKit”throughan18-year-oldclassmate.Robertsconsumedthe
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 66 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
67
FruitMedley,CrèmeBruleeand“Cool”MintpodsincludedintheStarterKitoverthe
courseofaweek.RobertsgaveawaytheTobaccopod.AfterfinishinghisStarterKit,
RobertsboughtaboxofMangoJUULpodsfromaclassmateandcontinued
purchasingMangopodsfromthatpointforward.
348. WhenRobertssentintheregistrationcardfortheJUULdeviceinhis
StarterKit,JUULbegansendingRobertspromotionalemails,includinganinvitation
tocombatfederaleffortstoregulateENDSflavorsbywritingtheFDAtoreporthow
JUUL’sflavorsplayedanimportantroleinRoberts’journeyasasmoker.Theemail
alsocontainedasurveyinvitingRobertstolistwhichJUULflavorshehadused.
349. RobertssawandreliedonJUULpromotionalmaterials,Instagram
account,website,andemailsheavilypromotingJUUL’sMango.ThoughRoberts
knewtheJUULcontainednicotine,JUUL’spromotionofitsflavorsledhimtobelieve
thatJUULuseposedminimalrisksandwasappropriateforhimtouse.
350. Robertsquicklydevelopedapod-a-daynicotineaddiction,whichcost
about$40aweektomaintain.Inanattempttosavemoney,Robertspurchased
bottlesofnicotinesalte-liquidfromalocalstore,whichheusedtorefill
emptyJUULpods.RelyingonJUUL’slabeling,Robertspurchasedbottlesof5%
nicotinesalte-liquidtorefillhisemptyJUULpods.BecauseJUULpodscontainatleast
5.9%nicotine,thethirdpartye-liquidsRobertspurchasedwerenotpotentenough
tosatisfyhisaddiction,leadingRobertstodiscardthebottleandpurchase
Defendant’spremium-pricedJUULpods.
351. Onceheturned18,Roberts,likemanyotherJUUL-addictedseniorsin
hishighschool,supportedhisaddictionbylegallypurchasingpackagesofJUULpods
atlocalgasstationsandresellingthepodstoyoungerstudentsatamarkup.Though
Robertsdeeplyregretsthisdecisionnow,hejustifieditatthetimeashim“helping
out”youngerclassmatesinthesamewaythatolderclassmateshad“helped”him
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 67 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
68
beforeheturned18.
352. Onsocialmedia,RobertssawasignificantamountofJUULpromotion
fromthirdparties,someofwhichincludeInstagramaccountsby:@Doit4JUUL,
@JUUL_break,@JUULwraps,@Juulzi.co,@DonnyK17,[email protected]
thepostsfromtheseaccountspromotedorincludedJUUL’snameandhashtagsthat
JUULpromoted,including#juul,#juulvapor,and#juulnation.OnSnapChatand
YouTube,RobertsfollowedorsawcontentfromDonnySmokes,includingtheJUUL
Challenge,andother“tricks”thatRobertsandhisfriendsmimicked.Allofthese
JUUL-relatedpromotionscreatedtheimpressionthatJUULwasmorepopularthan
itwas,JUULwasmadeforteenagers,andthatJUULusewasfor“cool”kids.
353. TheseJUUL-promotingaccountspromotednicotineabuse,
downplayedornormalizedaddictionrisks,encouragedJUULuseinschooland
providedguidanceonhowtoconcealaJUUL,createdtheimpressionthatJUULuse
wasmorecommonthanitwas,andthatJUULingwasthe“cool”thingtodo.These
accountsalsosoldJUULproductsdirectlythroughInstagramandpromoted
websitesthatsoldJUULproductswithinadequateageverificationprocedures,ifany
atall.Theseaccountsalsoencouragedviralcontentcreationbyencouraging
viewerstoposttheirownJUUL-relatedcontent,includingselfies,nicotineabuse
“tricks”likeinhalingtenJUULsatonce,memesnormalizingaddictionand
adolescentuseofJUULproducts,andimagerysuggestingthatJUULusemight
improveaperson’sdatingprospects.
354. Robertsdidnotknowthatmuchofthecontenthesawwasbeing
created,distributed,andpromotedbyJUULvendorswhoseaimwastopromote
JUULusetoadolescentsandprofitoffoftheiraddiction.HadRobertsknownthe
truth,hewouldhaverejectedofferstouseaJUULorwouldhaveattemptedtostop
usingaJUULfarsoonerthanhedid.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 68 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
69
355. JUUL’sviralmarketingcampaignensnaredRoberts,whosharedhis
ownJUUL-themed“promposal”inthespringof2018.HadRobertsknownthathis
creationofJUUL-relatedcontentwastheresultofJUUL’seffortstoturnyoungJUUL
usersintounpaidyouthadvertisersforJUUL’sproducts,Robertswouldnothave
postedthecontentorwouldnothaveconsentedtobeingusedtopromoteJUULto
otheradolescents.
356. Inoraroundthesummerof2018,Robertsjoined“JUULTalk.”An
“exclusiveinsightscommunity”developedbyDefendant,JUULTalk’swelcomeemail
warnedthatanyinformationsharedbyJUULTalkwas“confidential(subjecttothe
non-disclosureagreement)andnottobesharedwithothers.”
357. Withindaysofjoining,RobertsreceivedhisfirstJUULTalksurvey
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 69 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
70
invitation,whichwaspurportedlydesignedtohelpJUUL“designactivitiesand
experiencesthatarerelevantandvaluabletoyou.”
358. OnNovember20,2018,afterJUULannouncedthatitwouldremove
flavoredJUULpodsfromgasstations,JUULTalksentRobertsthefirstofthree
separateemailshewouldreceive,urginghimtocompleteasurveydetailinghowthe
removalofMangoandotherflavoredJUULpodsfromgasstationswouldimpacthim.
359. HadRobertsknownthetruthaboutJUULoritsmarketingactivities,
hewouldnothavejoinedJUULTalkorsubmittedanyotherinformationabout
himselftoJUUL.
360. Nowafreshmanincollege,Robertsstillconsumesatleastone
JUULpodaday.HesleepswithhisJUULnexttohimonanightstandandbeginsusing
hisJUULassoonashewakesupeachmorning.Hehasbeenunabletoquitortaper
downtolesspotente-liquidsthantheJUUL.HeestimatesthathisJUULaddiction
hascosthimthousandsofdollarssince2017.
361. Robertsrecentlylearnedthathisyoungerbrother,whoisafreshman
atRoberts’formerhighschool,isnowusingaJUUL,too.
362. HadRobertsknowntherisksofusingaJUULorthatthesudden
popularityofJUULwasnotbecausetheJUULwas“cool”butbecauseJUULwasusing
deceptiveadvertisingtacticstolureteenagerstoitspowerfullyaddictiveproduct,
hewouldnothaveusedaJUUL.
FF. W.T. and A.R.T., both minors, through their parent and Natural Guardian
Tonya Rowan
363. PlaintiffsW.T.andA.R.T,andtheirmotherandNaturalGuardian
TonyaRowan(“Rowan”),areresidentsofRedWing,Minnesota.
364. W.T.usedaJUULforthefirsttimein2016attheageof13.A.R.Tused
aJUULforthefirsttimein2017attheageof16.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 70 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
71
365. BeforeusingaJUUL,neitherW.T.norA.R.T.hadeversmokeda
cigaretteorusedothertobaccoproducts.
366. PriortotheirfirstJUULuse,bothW.T.andA.R.T.hadseenpoint-of-
sale(“POS”)promotionalmaterialsforJUULdevicesandproducts,includingsigns
anddisplays.ThesepromotionalmaterialsfeaturedimagesofJUUL’smulticolored
fruit-anddessert-flavoredpodsandoffersofdiscountsontheJUUL“StarterKit.”
NeitherW.T.norA.R.T.sawanywarningsordisclosuresinthesePOSmaterials
aboutJUUL’snicotinelevelsortheriskofaddictionJUULposed.The
representationsandomissionsinJUUL’sin-storepromotionsmateriallyimpacted
W.T.andA.R.T.’sassessmentof,andeventualdecisionstouse,JUULproducts.
367. BothW.T.andA.R.T.hadtheirfirstJUULexperiencewhenoffereda
pufffromafriend’sJUULdevice.
368. BothW.T.andA.R.T.startedpurchasingtheirownJUULproducts
withinashorttimeaftertheirfirstJUULexperience.
369. AlthoughW.T.andA.R.T.arestillbelowtheminimumlegalagetobuy
tobaccoproducts,theyhavealwaysbeenabletobuyJUULproductsfromtheir
friendsandclassmates.
370. BothW.T.andA.R.T.becameaddictedtonicotinewithinashorttime
aftertheystartedJUULing.
371. Althoughtheyhadneversmokedbefore,bothW.T.andA.R.T.now
smokecigarettestosatisfytheirnicotineaddictionwhentheydonothaveaccessto
JUUL.
372. Rowanreportsthat,withoutnicotine,W.T.andA.R.T.become“crazy
andornery.”
373. W.T.currentlyconsumesoneJUULpodperdayandA.R.T.consumes
oneJUULpodevery2or3days.TheybothstartJUULingwithin5minutesofwaking
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 71 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
72
up.
GG. Amber Royce
374. AmberRoyce("Royce")isaresidentofLebanon,Connecticut.
375. RoycebeganusingJUULin2017afterseeingadvertisementsforJUUL
productsatgasstationsandhearingaboutJUULfromfriendsandfamily.Shefirst
triedJUULhercousin.
376. PriortousingJUUL,Roycewasadailycigarettesmoker.Shehoped
thattheJUULwouldhelpherstopsmokingandbreakheraddictiontonicotine.
377. Initially,RoycebelievedthatJUULdidnotcontainanynicotine.After
shestartedpurchasingJUULproducts,shereadonJUUL'slabelthatitwas“5%
strength,”butshedidnotunderstandthismeantJUULcontainedatleast59mg/mL
nicotine.RoycedidnotknowthatJUULwasengineeredtodelivernicotinetothe
bloodstreammorerapidlyandingreaterquantitiesthanacigarette.
378. RoycebeganpurchasingJUULproductsonlineandatlocalgasstations
andvapeshops.Shestartedconsumingatleast(1)JUULpodperday.
379. Roycebelievessheisnowevenmoreaddictedtonicotinethaninthe
pastwhenshewasonlysmokingcigarettes.SheusesJUULcontinuouslythroughout
thedayandnight,andtheJUULdeviceisconstantlyinherhand.Therehavebeen
occasionswhereRoycehasfallenasleepandlaterwokenupwithherJUULdevice,
stillgrippedinherhand.
380. RoycehastriedtoweanherselfoffJUULbyusinganicotinepatch,but
herattemptshavebeenunsuccessful.
381. IfRoycehadknownhowmuchnicotineJUULpodscontained,she
wouldneverhavestartedusingtheproductandexposedherselftotheriskof
developingamoreseriousnicotineaddiction.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 72 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
73
HH. D.S., a minor, through his Parent and Natural Guardian Amber Selfridge
382. PlaintiffD.S.andhismotherandNaturalGuardianAmberSelfridge
(“Selfridge”)areresidentsofButler,Pennsylvania.WhenD.S.usedaJUULforthe
firsttimein2018,attheageof16,hewasnotasmokerandhadnevertried
cigarettes.
383. PriortousingaJUULforthefirsttime,D.S.hadseennumerousJUUL
advertisementsonline.SomeoftheseJUULadvertisementsdepictedfashionably
dressedyoungpeoplestrikingplayfulposeswithJUULdevicesinhand.Otheronline
JUULadspromotedJUULpodflavors,encouragingD.S.to“startyourweekwithCool
MintJUULpods”orto“indulgeindessertwithoutthespoon”withCrèmeBrulee
JUULpods.NoneoftheadvertisementsD.S.sawdisclosedthenatureoraddiction
risksofJUUL’sproducts,theexistenceoramountofnicotineinJUUL’sproducts,or
thattheJUULwasengineeredtodelivernicotinetothebloodstreammorerapidly
andingreaterquantitiesthanacigarette.
384. PriortousingaJUUL,D.S.hadalsoseenpoint-of-sale(“POS”)
promotionalmaterialsforJUULdevicesandproducts,includingsignsanddisplays.
D.S.didnotseeanywarningsordisclosuresaboutJUUL’snicotinelevelsortherisks
aJUULposedonthosePOSmaterialsandinsteadsawpromotionsforJUUL’sfruit-
anddessert-flavoredpods.TherepresentationsandomissionsinJUUL’sPOS
promotionsmateriallyimpactedS.G.’sassessmentofthefruit-flavoredJUULhe
wouldlaterbeoffered.
385. WhenofferedaJUULbyafriend,D.S.acceptedbecausehewas
interestedintryingthefruitflavors.JUUL’suseoffood-basedflavors,food-based
flavornamesandfood-basedadvertisingimageswasasubstantialcontributing
factorinS.C’sdecisiontouseandcontinueusingaJUUL.JUUL’sfood-based
promotionsmisledD.S.aboutthenatureofJUUL’sproductanddistortedtherisks
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 73 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
74
JUULproductsposed.WereitnotforJUUL'sflavoringsandflavor-basedpromotions,
D.S.wouldnothaveusedaJUULorwouldnothavecontinuedusingaJUUL.
386. D.S.likedthesweetflavorofthefirstJUULproductheusedandhe
continuedtotakepuffsofhisfriends’JUULsuntilhepurchasedhisown.
387. AfterpurchasinghisownJUULdevice,D.S.’sJUULconsumption
increasedsorapidlythathesoonfoundhimselfgoingthrough4JUULpodsaday.
388. Reasoningthathewouldnotbeabletosmoketheequivalentof4
JUULpodsadayincombustibletobaccoproducts,D.S.triedtoswitchfromJUULto
cigarettes.
389. JUUL’smethodsofpromotingitsproductsonsocialmediaplatforms
foreseeablytriggeredtheviralspreadofJUUL-promotionalcontentthatencouraged
teenstotakeupJUULuse,promoteddrug-likebehaviors,distortedandomittedthe
risksofJUULuse,andmisledyouthaboutthenatureandrisksofJUULuse.These
promotionsreachedD.S.andD.S.’ssocialnetwork,includingclassmates,leadingto
anincreaseinuptakeonJUULproductsandwidespreadmisperceptionsaboutthe
natureandrisksofJUULproducts.ButforJUUL’ssocialmediaadvertising,D.S.
wouldnothavebeenexposedtoandwouldnothaveusedaJUUL.
390. D.S.andhisfriendsfollowedmanyofthepopularJUULaccountson
Instagram.AmongthepostsD.S.sawwerethosethatencouraged,amongother
things,consumingmassivequantitiesofJUULvapor,usingmultipleJUULdevicesat
thesametimeandusingJUULinconjunctionwithcombustiblecigarettes.
391. D.S.haspostedsocialmediacontentaboutJUUL,mimickingtheJUUL-
relatedcontenthehasseenonotheraccounts.
392. D.S.stillconsumesmorethan1JUULpodaday,inadditiontoatleast
halfapackofcigarettes.HetakeshisfirstpuffofJUULwithin5minutesofwaking
up.HisfavoriteJUULpodflavorisCucumber..
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 74 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
75
II. Laura Staller
393. Plaintiff Laura Staller lives in Germantown, Wisconsin.
394. Plaintiff began using JUUL in September of 2017 as an alterative to
smoking, and saw marketing that led her to believe it was a better alternative and that it
would be one way to quit smoking altogether. Around that time and before she started she
saw the following in-store display, among others:
395. Plaintiff Staller believed there would be less nicotine in JUUL than in
cigarettes, because she thought the “5% strength” on the label indicated that the amount
of nicotine content of JUUL pods was significantly less than a pack of cigarettes.
396. Before she started, she saw in-store displays and advertisements that
indicated the strength but failed to include any warning, including this display:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 75 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
76
397. Plaintiff also heard ads about JUUL on the radio station 97.3FM and saw
ads on gas stations, none of which warned her of JUUL’s dangerous levels of nicotine or
potential harms it could cause.
398. Plaintiff went on JUUL’s website when she first started looking into it.
The website indicated that it was a better alternative to smoking and would help her quit
smoking.
399. Plaintiff uses one and one half JUULpods a day which is equivalent to
more than a pack and a half of cigarettes a day. When she was using cigarettes, she was
using less than a pack a day. So she is now consuming much more nicotine because of
JUUL.
400. Plaintiff has had unusual fainting spells since using JUUL and has noticed
that her ability to take deep breaths and her endurance has decreased since using JUUL.
She has had to wear a heart monitor for 48 hours. The only thing in her lifestyle that has
changed has been her use of JUUL.
401. Plaintiff’s use of JUUL seems to be affecting her respiratory health worse
than when she was smoking.
402. Plaintiff uses the mango JUULpods, which feel easier to breathe in than a
cigarette. She started with Tobacco flavor and didn’t like it.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 76 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
77
403. Laura has not been able to quit and it has been over one and a half years.
She was hoping to quit in 2018, but she is addicted.
404. Plaintiff was led to believe JUUL would help her quit her nicotine
addiction, instead of becoming more addicted to another product.
405. Laura saw advertising from JUULs online, which never warned of how
addictive it was. Not on the website, or anywhere else.
406. Laura would never have purchased JUUL if she had known the true nature
of nicotine content and delivery.
JJ. Anthony Smith
407. AnthonySmithobtainedhisfirstJUULe-cigaretteandJUULpodsinan
efforttocurtailhisnicotineaddictionandquitsmoking.
408. Inearly2015,Smithwas17andhebeganseeingJUULadvertisedvia
TwitterandInstagram.Inparticular,heremembersseeingAdvertisement65of
AppendixConTwitter.Herecallsthatmanyoftheadshadimagesofyoung
people—youngenoughtobeinhighschool—whooftenlookedlikehisfriends,and
theyappearedtobehavingfun,vapingandenjoyingahip,coolactivity.
409. SmithalsorecallsseeinganadhighlysimilartoAdvertisement66
(youngwomanpromotingswitchtoJUUL)ofAppendixConInstagram.In
particular,herecallsayoung,blondwomanthatremindedhimofagoodfriendof
his,exceptthattheadherecallsseeingdidnotincludeadisclaimeraboutthe
nicotinecontent.ItwasSmith’stypicalhabittoscrollthroughimagesonInstagram
quickly,andherarelypausedtoopenpoststoreadanycontent,thushadanysuch
disclaimerbeenthere,hewouldnothaveseenit.Becauseofthemodel’ssimilarity
tohisgoodfriend,thatadinparticularpiquedhiscuriosityaboutJUUL.Healso
begannoticingJUUL’sadsfortheirflavoredpods,whichalsomadehiminterested.
Ingeneral,theadstoutedJUULproductsasasafe,healthyalternativetosmoking,
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 77 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
78
whichSmithbelievedmeantitwasdeliveringlessnicotine.
410. Shortlyafterviewingtheadvertisementwiththeblondwoman,Smith
visitedaCircleK.HesawalargeadvertisementthereforaJUULstarterpack,which
includedthedeviceandfourdifferentflavoredpods.Theadvertisementwassimilar
toAdvertisement67ofAppendixC(posterusingdiscounttopromoteJUULstarter
kit).However,hedidnotseeanywarningthattheproductcontainednicotine,or
thatonepodcontainedmorenicotinethanapackofcigarettes.Hereasonedthata
starterpackwouldallowhimtotryseveralflavorsforalowerprice,sohedecided
totryit.Thestarterpackwaspurchasedforapproximately$29.
411. Smithbeganusingtheproduct,noticedthathewouldgetaquick
nicotinebuzzthatwasmoreintensethancigarettes,butheattributedthattothe
factthatitwasavaporinsteadofasmoke.RatherthanweaningAnthonySmithoff
ofnicotine,theintensedosageofnicotinedeliveredbytheJUULproductsresultedin
anincreasednicotineaddiction,andanincreasedconsumptionofnicotineandJUUL
products,uppinghisconsumptionofoneJUULpodperday.Thefactthatthemint
flavoroftheJUULpodsispleasanthasalsoplayedaroleinhiscontinueduseofJUUL
products.
412. Attheageof18,AnthonySmithswitchedtouseexclusivelyof
JUULpodsasasourceofnicotine.Untilapproximatelythespringof2018,Anthony
SmithhadconsumedJUULpodsonadailybasisforoverthreeyears,andfounditfar
moreaddictivethantraditionalcigarettes,tothepointwherehespentseveralyears
unabletomakeitthroughadaywithoutJUULing.Attimes,hewouldtrytoquit,but
founditdifficultduetothefactthattheadvertisingwascontinuallybeingdelivered
tohimviasocialmedia.Atonepoint,hedidquit,andthenhesawanadforanew
mangoflavoredpod,seeAppendixC,Advertisement68,whichcausedhimto
purchasemorepodsandbeginusingJUULagain.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 78 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
79
413. IfAnthonySmithhadknownthattheJUULpodscontainedanicotine
saltthatdeliveredamorepotentdoseofnicotinethanatraditionalcigarette,he
wouldnothavepurchasedtheJUULproduct.
KK. Corey Smith
414. CoreySmithis18yearsold,andstartedconsumingJUULpodswhen
hewas17.CoreySmithsawJUULadvertisementspriortohispurchase,especially
onsocialmediasuchInstagram,wherehesawadspostedbyJUUL.Coreyfoundthe
JUULproductsappealingbasedonthoseadvertisements,whichdidnotconveythe
factthatnicotinesaltsdeliveraneffectivedoseofnicotinehigherthanatraditional
cigarette.CoreySmithalsofoundtheUSB-driveshapeoftheJUULappealingbased
onitssleekdesign.CoreySmithwasalsoattractedbythefruit-likeflavorsandthe
CoolMintflavorinparticular.CoreySmithisnowaddictedtoJUULpods,and
consumesapackofJUULpodsperweek.
415. IfCoreySmithhadknownthatJUUL’suseofnicotinesaltsdeliveran
effectivedoseofnicotinehigherthanatraditionalcigarette,hewouldnothave
purchaseJUULproducts.
LL. T.B.T. through his parent and Natural Guardian Marlene Thomseth-Belcher
416. PlaintiffT.B.T.andhisparentandNaturalGuardian
MarleneThomseth-Belcher (“Thomseth-Belcher”)resideinMinneapolis,
Minnesota.
417. PriortousingaJUULforthefirsttimein2017,attheageof15,T.B.T.
hadseenJUULsignsanddisplaysinlocalstorespromotingJUULflavorsandoffering
discountsonJUUL“StarterKits.”HehadalsoseenonlineJUULadvertisements
promotingJUULflavors.NoneofthisJUULmessagingdisclosedthatJUULproducts
containatleast59mg/mLofnicotineanddelivernicotinetothebloodstreammore
effectivelythancigarettes.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 79 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
80
418. InthetimeleadinguptohisfirstJUULexperience,T.B.T.saw
increasingamountsofJUUL-relatedcontentonthesocialmediaplatforms
InstagramandSnapchat.Thiscontent,whichoftenfeaturedyoungpeople
performing“tricks”withexhaledJUULvapor,ledT.B.T.tobelievethatusingJUUL
wasa“cool”activitythatwouldimprovehissocialstatus.
419. WhenoneofT.B.T.’sfriendsofferedhimaJUUL,heaccepted.He
enjoyedthe“buzzed”feelinghereceivedfromtheJUUL’spowerfulnicotinehit.He
doesnotrecallwhichflavorhetriedfirst,butheknowsitwasnottobacco.T.B.T.
wouldnothavetriedJUULifitwereonlyavailableintobaccoflavor.
420. ShortlyafterhestartedusingJUUL,T.B.T.beganexperimentingwith
marijuana.Hecontinuedtousemarijuanauntillate2018.
421. Now17,T.B.T.acknowledgesthatheisaddictedtonicotine.
422. DespitebeingbelowtheminimumlegalagetopurchaseJUUL
products,T.B.T.isabletobuyJUULproductsfromlocalstores.AlthoughThomseth-
Belcherhasasked,T.B.T.refusestodisclosewhichstoressellhimJUULproducts.
423. T.B.T.getsmoneytopayforJUULproductsbysellingitemsforcash.
HealsoresellsJUULproductstofinancehisownhabit.
424. T.B.T.has,fromtimetotime,refilledhisJUULpodswithe-liquidfrom
othermanufacturers.However,mostcommerciale-liquidcontainsfarlessnicotine
thanthee-liquidinJUULpodsandthusfailstosatisfyT.B.T.’snicotineaddiction.
Therefore,T.B.T.continuestouseJUULpodswiththeiroriginalJUUL-manufactured
e-liquid.
425. TheonlinesocialmediacontentthatT.B.T.hasseen,andcontinuesto
see,onlinenormalizesteenJUULuseby,forexample,presentingtheJUULdevice
alongsideearbuds,cellphonesandothercommonitemsthatcomprisea“highschool
starterpack.”
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 80 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
81
426. T.B.T.’sspent5monthsinanoutpatientaddictionprogramthatcost
severalthousanddollars.TheprogramprovedineffectiveandT.B.T.isstilladdicted
tonicotine.
427. T.B.T.currentlyconsumesmorethan1JUULpodperday.Hestarts
JUULingwithin5minutesofwakingup.
428. Thomseth-BelcherhasaskedT.B.T.tomoveoutofthefamilyhomeso
hisJUULandmarijuanausewillnotprovideabadexampleforhisyoungersibling.
MM. Michael Viscomi
429. Plaintiff Michael Viscomi is a citizen of Pennsylvania and resides in
Bethlehem, PA.
430. In 2014, Mr. Viscomi smoked a pack of cigarettes each day, which he
started to reduce to a few cigarettes each day. Prior to March, 2018, he had reduced his
cigarette consumption down to several cigarettes per day through the use of alternative
products, such as nicotine gum, chewing tobacco and non-JUUL vaping products.
431. On March 1, 2018, Mr. Viscomi switched from smoking cigarettes to
consuming JUUL pods in an attempt to quit smoking cigarettes completely and wean
himself off of his nicotine addiction. At that time, Mr. Viscomi believed that one JUUL
pod would supply him with the same quantity of nicotine as one pack of cigarettes.
432. Prior to consuming JUUL pods, Mr. Viscomi was exposed to and did see
JUUL advertising, promotional and marketing materials, particularly in the form of
JUUL Instagram posts featuring young, attractive people using the product. He
specifically followed @SupremePatty on Instagram. He also visited the JUUL website
and thereafter regularly and consistently received JUUL emails. Specifically, he saw the
following image asking him to “Find [His] Favorite Flavor” and others similar ads:
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 81 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
82
433. Some of these social media posts show abuse of JUUL and encourage
youth to smoke JUUL, or multiple JUULs at once, including these post that Mr. Viscomi
saw during the class period:
434. Prior to consuming JUUL pods, Mr. Viscomi was not aware of the actual
amount or potency of nicotine that JUUL products would deliver into his body or that the
product was developed to maximize the effects on him of the nicotine it contained. He
did see JUUL’s representation of “5% strength” on its packaging and thought that meant
5% nicotine content. He also saw JUUL’s statement that a JUULpod is equivalent to a
pack of cigarettes and understood that to mean “equivalent nicotine content.” He also saw
JUUL’s representation that “1 JUULPOD = 1 pack of cigarettes” and “alternative for
adult smokers” and believed those to mean that JUUL is a less addictive alternative to
cigarettes.
435. After March 1, 2018, Mr. Viscomi continued to be exposed to and saw
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 82 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
83
JUUL advertising, promotional and marketing materials in the form of JUUL Instagram
posts and radio advertisements.
436. Since that time, Mr. Viscomi began consuming JUUL consistently and
constantly at a rate of at least one JUUL pod each day, or taken approximately 200 hits
from his JUUL device each day. He has consumed every flavor JUUL offers, including
purchasing and consuming a JUUL starter kit, which contains all of the flavors offered.
437. Based on the JUUL marketing, advertisting and promotional mateirals to
which he was exposed, Mr. Viscomi was not aware that JUUL could deliver more
nicotine per puff than a cigarette, or that the nicotine delivered by the JUUL entered the
bloodstream faster than a cigarette
438. In fact, the JUUL marketing Mr. Viscomi saw contained no warnings,
either on JUUL’s website, in-store displays, or on the packaging itself, including the
following ads which Mr. Viscomi saw during the class period, among many others:
439. Since starting to consume JUUL pods, Mr. Viscomi has become addicted
to the cool mint JUULpods and the nicotine salts they contain, an addiction he considers
worse than his previous addiction to cigarettes. Indeed, JUULing (the commonly used
phrase among users of JUUL products to mean the use of JUUL products) is on his mind
more than smoking cigarettes was. Rather than weaning Mr. Viscomi off of cigarettes
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 83 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
84
and nicotine, the JUUL products delivered a high dose of nicotine that resulted in an
increased nicotine addiction, an increased consumption of nicotine, and an increase in the
number of JUUL products he consumed.
440. Mr. Viscomi purchases his JUUL products at gas stations, Wawa and
Sheetz at an approximate price of $23 per pack of four pods.
441. Mr. Viscomi would not have purchased JUUL products had he known that
the nicotine salts in JUUL pods were highly addictive and more potent and addictive than
the traditional cigarettes from which he was attempting to wean himself.
NN. O.V. through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti
442. O.V. and her mother Tanya Viti (“Viti”) are residents of Dedham,
Massachusetts.
443. O.V. first started using JUUL at the age of twelve, while in sixth grade.
D.C. actively uses Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube where she is exposed to JUUL-
related content from other adolescents and from JUUL-related accounts.
444. On Instagram, O.V. saw a significant amount of JUUL promotional
content from third parties, including the Instagram accounts @Doit4JUUL and
@SupremePatty. On YouTube and SnapChat, O.V. saw numerous JUUL-themed videos
from EonSmoke and Supreme Patty. This content was overtly youth-oriented
and encouraged JUUL use, depicting JUULing as the “cool” thing to do. O.V. did not
know that much of the content she saw was being created, distributed,
and promoted by JUUL vendors or paid influencers whose aim was to promote JUUL
use to adolescents and profit from their addiction.
445. Before O.V. even tried JUUL, she also viewed point-of-sale (“POS”)
promotional materials for JUUL devices and products, including signs and displays.
These promotional materials featured images of JUUL’s multicolored, flavored pods.
O.V. did not see any warnings or disclosures in these POS materials about JUUL’s
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 84 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
85
nicotine levels or the risks JUUL posed. The representations and omissions in JUUL’s in-
store promotions materially impacted O.V.’s assessment of, and eventual decision to use,
JUUL products.
446. After discovering JUUL on social media and in stores, O.V. sought out
friends in neighboring towns that were already using JUUL. When O.V. started using
JUUL, she had no idea the product contained nicotine. When Viti confronted her
daughter about her JUUL use, O.V. told her mother JUULpods were “flavored juice,”
which is what she was led to believe based on the advertisements she had viewed. Even
after Viti informed her daughter that JUUL contained nicotine, O.V. chose to follow her
perception of JUUL, cultivated from an overload of advertisements, versus the advice of
her mother.
447. After trying JUUL with friends, O.V. quickly became addicted to nicotine
and started using JUUL regularly. Once O.V. entered seventh grade, JUUL use had
become rampant in her school. O.V. told her mother that kids in her school would hide
JUUL devices in their shoes and try to use them while in class; it was considered “cool”
to be able to smoke JUUL in class and get away with it. According to O.V., there are very
few students in her school that do not use JUUL.
448. O.V. and her friends regularly posted photographs of themselves with
JUUL on social media. In October 2018, O.V. was suspended from school after her and a
friend posted an image of themselves “JUULing” in the bathroom on social media.
449. O.V. has admitted to her mother that she is addicted to nicotine. Recently,
Viti found a jar of nicotine in O.V.’s bedroom.
450. O.V. has suffered academically due to her JUUL use. In addition to her
suspension from school, O.V. went from being an “A-student" to receiving all “F”s.
451. O.V. has also experienced severe physical, financial, psychological, and
social repercussions from her JUUL use and severe nicotine addiction.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 85 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
86
452. Physically, O.V. now experiences acute headaches and stomachaches and
becomes visibly irritated and fidgety when she cannot consume nicotine.
453. Financially, O.V.’s JUUL use has had a significant impact on her parents.
O.V. has stolen large quantities of money from her parents to purchase JUUL products.
454. VitihasconfiscatednumerousJUULdevicesandJUULpodsfromO.V.
Unfortunately,noneofhereffortshavebeensuccessful.O.V.hastoldherparents
thatshewilljustuseafriend’sJUULdeviceassoonasshegetstoschool.
OO. S.W. through his parent and natural guardian Joe Weibel
455. S.W.andhisfatherandnaturalguardianJoeWeibel(“Weibel”)are
residentsofChadwicks,NewYork.
456. BeforeS.W.eventriedJUUL,healsoviewedpoint-of-sale(“POS”)
promotionalmaterialsforJUULdevicesandproducts,includingsignsanddisplays.
ThesepromotionalmaterialsfeaturedimagesofJUUL’smulticoloredfruit-flavored
pods.S.W.didnotseeanywarningsordisclosuresinthesePOSmaterialsabout
JUUL’snicotinelevelsortherisksJUULposed.Therepresentationsandomissionsin
JUUL’sin-storepromotionsmateriallyimpactedS.W.’sassessmentof,andeventual
decisiontouse,JUULproducts.
457. S.W.didnotunderstandtherisksofnicotinewhenheusedaJUULfor
thefirsttime,ortheeffectsitcouldhaveonhim.JUULuseisrampantinS.W.’stown
andhighschool.S.W.hastoldWeibelthathisbasketballteamevenusesJUULinthe
lockerroom,whichhiscoachescannotdetectbecauseJUULproductsreleaseno
odororvisiblesmoke.
458. OlderstudentsatS.W.’shighschoolsellindividualpodstoyounger
studentsforprofit.S.W.’soldersisterhasevenencouragedS.W.tostartselling
JUULpods.
459. EventhoughWeibelhasforbiddenS.W.fromusingJUULproducts,
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 86 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
87
WeibelbelieveshecontinuestosneakJUUL.Weibel’s19-year-olddaughterisalso
highlyaddictedtoJUUL;WeibelbelieveshisdaughterpurchasesJUULpodsfrom
localgasstationsandsharesthemwithS.W.Weibelbelieveshischildrenspenda
significantamountofmoneyonJUULproductseachweek.
460. WhenS.W.startedusingJUUL,hebelievedthatJUULproductswere
safeandnon-addictive.
461. S.W.wouldnothavestartedusingJUULifheknewitcontained
nicotine.Additionally,S.W.wouldnothaveusedatobaccoormenthol-flavoredJUUL
becauseheassociatesbothofthoseflavorswithcigarettes,whichheknewtoavoid.
462. WeibelisconfidentthathadS.W.orhis19-year-olddaughterknown
therisksthattheJUULposed,theywouldneverhaveusedit.
PP. J.Y., a Minor, through his Parent and Natural Guardian Barbara Yanucci
463. Plaintiff Barbara Yanucci is the mother of J.Y., a minor who is a citizen of
Florida, residing in Port St. Lucie.
464. J.Y. is presently 16 years old and began using JUUL pods at the age of 15
because he thought it was fun.
465. Prior to using a JUUL, J.Y. had also seen point-of-sale (“POS”)
promotional materials for JUUL devices and products, including signs and displays. J.Y.
did not see any warnings or disclosures in these POS materials about the existence or
amount of nicotine in a JUUL or the risks nicotine posed. Instead, he saw promotions for
JUUL’s fruit- and dessert-flavored pods. The representations and omissions in JUUL’s
in-store promotions materially impacted J.Y. assessment of the JUUL he would later try.
Specific representations J.Y. saw are available at
http://www.classlawdc.com/2019/01/25/juul-images-2/.
466. When he first tried a JUUL, J.Y., as a minor, could not appreciate the
dangers posed by the nicotine and other chemicals contained in the JUUL, and was not
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 87 of 88
App’xA(PlfAllegations),1stConsol.Compl.,InreJUULProds.Lit.
88
aware how much nicotine a JUUL contained or that the JUUL had specifically been
developed to maximize the addictive effects of the nicotine it contained and to put
extremely high doses of nicotine into the bloodstream.
467. J.Y. states that many of his friends in high school were consuming JUUL
products at the time he began using JUUL and continue to do so. JUUL products were
and still are popular, ubiquitous and easy to obtain.
468. J.Y., a minor, has himself purchased JUUL products at a Wawa
convenience store.
469. J.Y. now considers himself addicted to JUUL pods and has consumed
JUUL pods up to 12 times per day. His favorite flavor is mint. His craving for nicotine
has increased while using the JUUL pods, and he now uses vaping devices that deliver
even more nicotine than JUUL.
470. J.Y. is not aware of any label on JUUL packaging indicating that the
product contains nicotine or warning of the dangers of the nicotine because he does not
read the packaging.
471. J.Y. initially concealed his use of JUUL from his mother and Natural
Guardian Barbara Yannucci, who, after learning that JUUL products contain nicotine and
appreciating the dangers of nicotine, has done and continues to do everything in her
power to get her son to quit using JUUL products. She has not been successful to date.
Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 82-2 Filed 01/30/19 Page 88 of 88