appendix e wildlife survey report
TRANSCRIPT
Appendix E
Wildlife Survey Report
198305
WILDLIFE MONITORING REPORT FOR 2015-2016 ANNUAL REPORT PERIOD
Prepared for
Uranerz Energy Corporation (an Energy Fuels Company)
By
TRC Environmental Corporation _Laramie, Wyoming TRC Project 198305
October 2016
Uranerz Energy Corporation
• TABLE OF CONTENTS
A.1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... A-1
A.2.0 2016 SURVEY METHODS....................................................................................... A-1 A.2.1 Raptor Nest Survey......................................................................................... A-1 A.2.2 Greater Sage-grouse Lek Surveys................................................................... A-1
A.3.0 2016 RESULTS.......................................................................................................... A-2 A.3.1 Raptor Nest Survey......................................................................................... A-2 A.3.2 Greater Sage-grouse Lek Surveys..................................................................... A-6
LIST OFT ABLES
Table A.l Locations and Activity Status ofRaptor Nests, Nichols Ranch ISR Project, 2016 .......................................................................................... A-3
TableA.2 Location of Greater Sage-grouse Leks and Number of Birds Observed, Nichols Ranch ISR Project, 2016 .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . A-7
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A.1 Locations and Status of Raptor Nests and Greater Sage-grouse Leks, Nichols Ranch ISR Project, 2016 .............................................. Map Pocket
198305 Uranerz Energy Corporation
•
A-1
A.1.0 INTRODUCTION
During the annual report period, Energy Fuels retained TRC Environmental Corporation to
continue the wildlife monitoring program specified in the Mine Plan. This annual report
includes the results of the 2016 raptor nest survey and greater sage-grouse lek surveys for the
Nichols Ranch and Hank Units.
A.2.0 2016 SURVEY METHODS
A.2.1 Raptor Nest Survey
All known raptor nests within the permit area and a 0.5-mi buffer were located and surveyed by
biologists from Wildlife Resources, LLC, of Big Hom, Wyoming from May 5 through June 6,
2016. Suitable habitats (e.g., cliffs, riparian areas) were searched a minimum of three site visits
using binoculars and/or spotting scopes to locate nest structures, whitewash, or any other
indicator of past or present raptor nesting (e.g., defensive or incubating raptors, the presence of
juvenile raptors, repeated observations of raptors in the same general area). These surveys
followed the protocol outlined in Appendix B of the Wyoming DEQ Coal Regulations. When a
nest could not be looked into, the nest was classified as active if at least one adult was observed
defending the nest. If no sign of occupancy was evident, the area below and around the nest was
checked for signs of recent activity (mute, pellets, feathers, prey remains, or young) in an attempt
to verify occupancy. In addition, black-tailed prairie dog towns within the pennit area and a
0.5-mi buffer were searched using binoculars and/or spotting scopes to locate burrowing owl nest
locations. Most areas of the prairie dog towns were also searched by traversing the towns and
examining burrows for whitewash or other sign of activity (i.e., mutes, feathers).
A.2.2 Greater Sage-grouse Lek Surveys
Eleven known greater sage-grouse leks or satellite leks within 2.0 mi of the Nichols Ranch ISR
project area were searched for activity (three site visits) between April 4 and May 5, 2016, in
accordance with the approved wildlife monitoring plan. None of these leks are located within
198305 Uranerz Energy Corporation
A-2
either the Nichols Ranch or Hank Unit boundaries. Biologists drove. to the area and used
binoculars and/or spotting scopes to locate the lek area and to count the peak number of male and
female greater sage-grouse present during each survey. Three lek searches were conducted at
each lek, and surveys were conducted from as close to sunrise as possible to 0.5 hour after
sunnse.
A.3.0 2016 RESULTS
A.3.1 Raptor Nest Survey
Eighty-one nests within the raptor nest survey area were surveyed by biologists from Wildlife
Resources, LLC, of Big Hom, Wyoming, during the spring of 2016. Of the 81 nests, ten nests
were determined to be active. Active nests included three red-tailed hawk nests, two great
homed owl nest, one golden eagle nest, and four long eared owl nests. All the red-tailed hawk
and great homed owl nests, and 3 of the long-eared owl nests were located in or near the Hank
Unit survey area and the golden eagle nest and the fourth long eared owl nest were located near
the Nichols Ranch Unit. Seven nests--two great homed owl nests, two long-eared owl nests and
the golden eagle nest produced young. Only one of the long-eared owl nests active in May failed
by the June productivity site visit. The number of young (i.e., production) of the other two active
raptor nests-a red-tailed hawk nest (Nest 13824) and the long-eared owl nest (Nest A8-16)
could not be determined during the June visit because the biologist could not see into Nest 13824
and Nest A8-16 had an adult long-eared owl on the nest. The locations and status of all 81 nests
are described in Table A.I and illustrated on Exhibit A.I. Four nest structures were newly
recorded in 2016 and all four nests were located in the Hank Unit. The increase in the number of
nests was likely due to increased familiarity of the field biologists with the project area
(specifically the Hank Unit) associated with the rugged conditions and dense vegetation around
that portion of the Pumpkin Buttes. Two of the new nests were active in 2016 and were
occupied by red-tailed hawks. The species associated with the other two new nest was not
determined.
198305 Uranerz Energy Corporation
• \0 WLR/ """"3 00
Species1 Status2 Sub/Hf ~ w Unit BLMID Twn Rng Sec., qq/q Easting Northing Date Production Condition Nest/Ht 0
,_..... Vt Hank 4098 REfA 44 76 36, NE/NE 425170 4844450 5/5/2016 ACTI REfAin GOOD CTU50' Sticks/40'
(!)
nest ?>-1--'
Hank 4529 GRHO 43 75 7, NE/NW 425809 4841286 5/18/2016 ACTI 2 Class II GOOD CTU45' Sticks/30' young
Hank 4533 GRHO 43 75 7, SW/SW 425535 4839860 5/18/2016 ACTI 3 Class II FAIR CTU35' Sticks/15' r 0 young (")
Hank 13010 LOOW 43 75 5, NE/SW 427610 4842276 5/20/2016 ACTI LOOWin FAIR JUU15' Sticks/10' ~ ....... nest
0 ~ [/.l
Hank 13819 43 7, NW/NE 426149 5/18/2016 ACTI REfA 75 4841190 1 class I GOOD CTU30' Sticks/25' § visible p...
Hank 13823 REfA 43 75 8, SW/NW 426924 4840775 5/18/2016 ACTI REfAin GOOD CTU50' Sticks/40' > nest g. .......
Hank A7-16 LOOW 44 75 30, SE/SE 426683 4844810 5/21/2016 ACTI 1 egg GOOD JUN/18' Sticks/8' <:
Hank A8-16 LOOW 44 75 31, NE/NE 426722 4844685 5/21/2016 ACTI LOOWin GOOD JUN/18' Sticks/10' q·
nest r:/"l .......
Hank 3654 GRHO 43 75 7, NE/NW 425810 4841363 5/18/2016 INAC FAIR CLF Sticks/18' ~ Hank 3655 REfA 43 75 7, NW/NE 426126 4841173 5/18/2016 INAC GONE Tree fell Sticks/30'
[/.l
0 Hank 3658 GRHO 43 75 7, NW/NW 425538 4841443 5/18/2016 INAC GONE CTU40' Sticks/35' >-I)
Hank 4101 LOOW 43 76 1, NE/NE 425028 4842796 5/18/2016 INAC FAIR JUU18' Sticks/12' :::0 Hank 4102 PRFA 44 75 32,SW/SW 427040 4843215 5/20/2016 INAC ROG .g
....... Hank 4103 PRFA 44 75 32,SW/SW 427130 4843380 5/20/2016 INAC ROC 0 .... Hank 4106 LOOW 44 75 30, NE/SW 425968 4845500 5/5/2016 INAC FAIR JUU15' Sticks/8' z Hank 4115 UNRA 43 76 1, NW/SE 424626 4842237 5/18/2016 INAC POOR JUU12' Sticks/7' (!)
-[,'.l
Hank 4527 LOOW 43 76 1, NE/SE 425162 4841951 5/18/2016 INAC GONE JUU16' Sticks/12' ....... u[/.l
Hank 4528 GOEA 43 75 7, NW/NW 425405 4841428 5/18/2016 INAC GONE Tree fell Sticks/35' z Hank 4531 GRHO 43 75 7, SE/NW 425852 4840885 5/18/2016 INAC FAIR CTU35' Sticks/25' .......
Hank 4536 GRHO 43 76 13, NE/NE 424825 4839733 5/18/2016 INAC POOR CTU45' Sticks/30' g. Hank 6185 UNRA 43 76 13, NE/NE 424860 4839710 5/18/2016 INAC GONE dup of Sticks 0
~ ,_..... [/.l
4536 :::0 !::) :::s Hank 6517 GRHO 43 75 8, NW/NW 426895 4841340 5/18/2016 INAC GONE Destroyed Dirt/20' § ~
Hank 6518 LOOW 43 75 7, SEINE 426766 4840910 5/18/2016 INAC GONE JUU15' Sticks/10' t::l
(")
Hank 6521 UNRA 43 75 8, NW/SW 427150 4840503 5/18/2016 INAC POOR JUU14' Sticks/10' l:r'
~ ,.......
Hank 6522 UNRA 43 75 8, NW/SW 427191 4840479 5/18/2016 INAC GONE CTU35' Sticks/25' r:/"l ~
Hank 6523 UNRA 43 75 8, NW/SW 427193 4840478 5/18/2016 INAC FAIR JUU18' Sticks/10' :::0
~ ro Hank 6524 UNRA 43 75 8, NW/SW 427203 4840367 5/18/2016 INAC GONE JUU15' Sticks/10' ....
g Hank 6525 BBMA 43 75 8,SW/SW 427216 4840197 5/18/2016 INAC GONE Tree Fell Sticks/12' .3. (!)
Hank 6534 REfA 43 75 8,SW/NW 426984 4840745 5/18/2016 INAC GONE CTU50' Sticks/40' ua -2l Hank 6535 REfA 43 75 8,SW/NW 426940 4840760 5/18/2016 INAC GONE CTD/10' Sticks/10'
c N ~ Hank 12340 BBMA 44 76 25, NE/NE 425109 4846310 5/21/2016 INAC GONE JUN 0 !::)
Hank 12800 UNRA 43 75 7, SE/NE 426712 4840910 5/18/2016 INAC GONE CTU40' Sticks/30' 1--' > ..... 0\ .....
c Hank 12843 UNRA 43 75 8, NW/SW 427204 4840440 5/18/2016 INAC POOR JUU20' Sticks/15' I
:::s w
- ~ 'D WLR/ 00
Species1 status2 Sub/Ht3 ~ UJ Unit BLM ID Twn Rng Sec., qq/q Easting Northing Date Production Condition Nest/Ht 0 ....... Vi
Hank 12844 UNRA 43 75 5, NE/SW 427461 4842035 5/20/2016 INAC FAIR JUU12' Sticks/8' ('1)
Hank 12865 GRHO 44 76 25, NE/NE 425277 4846360 5/21/2016 INAC FAIR CTU30' Sticks/25' ?>-Hank 12893 TUVU 44 75 32, SW/SW 427060 4843210 5/20/2016 INAC GOOD Hole Dirt
.......
Hank 12902 UNRA 43 75 6, NW/NW 425247 4842889 5/18/2016 INAC GONE JUU25' Sticks/20' ,.--.-. (")
Hank 13009 UNRA 43 75 5, NE/SW 427465 4842089 5/20/2016 INAC GONE JUU15' Sticks/12' 0
Hank 13019 PRFA 43 75 5, NW/NW 427354 4843011 5/20/2016 INAC CLF g Hank 13386 UNRA 44 75 30, SE/SE 426871 4845207 5/21/2016 INAC GONE JUN/20' Sticks/12' s·
i::: Hank 13471 UNRA 43 75 8,SW/SW 427209 4839955 5/18/2016 INAC POOR CTU35' Sticks/20' ('1)
Hank 13474 UNRA 43 75 7, NW/NW 425435 4841389 5/18/2016 INAC POOR CTU45' Sticks/35' ~ Hank 13488 UNRA 43 75 6, SEINE 426826 4842568 5/20/2016 INAC FAIR JUN/12' Sticks/8' Hank 13489 UNRA 43 75 8, NW/SW 427012 4840662 5/18/2016 INAC POOR JUN/15' Sticks/10' Hank 13491 UNRA 43 75 7, NE/NW 426029 4841226 5/18/2016 INAC GONE JUN/18' Sticks/10' Hank 13492 UNRA 43 75 8, NW/SW 427004 4840672 5/18/2016 INAC POOR JUN/20' Sticks/15' Hank 13493 UNRA 43 75 8, NW/SW 427008 4840671 5/18/2016 INAC GONE JUN/20' Sticks/15' Hank 13496 BBMA 43 75 8, NW/SW 427185 4840383 6/3/2016 INAC BBMA JUN/25' Sticks/15'
Hank 13584 PRFA 44 75 32, SW/SW 427033 4843274 5/20/2016 INAC CLF Hank 13587 UNRA 44 75 30, NW/SE 426255 4845466 5/5/2016 INAC GONE CTU60' Sticks/45' Hank 13595 UNRA 43 75 8, SE/NW 427380 4841060 5/18/2016 INAC FAIR JUN/30' Sticks/18'
Hank 13853 UNRA 44 75 31, SEINE 426768 4843928 5/5/2016 INAC FAIR JUN/12' Sticks/10' Hank 13857 UNRA 44 75 32, SW/NW 427286 4844298 5/21/2016 INAC FAIR JUN/15' Sticks/12' .
Hank 17-16 UNRA 44 75 32, NE/NE 426666 4844716 5/21/2016 INAC GOOD JUN Sticks
Nichols 13478 LOOW 43 76 16, SE/NW 419493 4839080 5/5/2016 ACTI Bird on nest GOOD CTU50' Sticks/20' Ranch Nichols 5486 RETA 43 76 16, SE/NW 419491 4839078 5/5/2016 INAC POOR CTU55' Sticks/40' Ranch Nichols 5491 LOOW 43 76 16, SW/NW 418730 4839255 5/5/2016 INAC GONE CTU40' Sticks/30' Ranch Nichols 5531 UNRA 43 76 17, NE/NW 417680 4839800 5/5/2016 INAC GONE CTU40' Sticks/30'
Ranch
~ Nichols 5532 RETA 43 76 17, NW/NW 417390 4839590 5/5/2016 INAC GONE CTU35' Sticks/20'
Ranch § Nichols 5533 RETA 43 76 17, NW/NW 417380 4839615 5/5/2016 INAC GONE CTU45' Sticks/30' (\> Ranch t:l Nichols 5534 UNRA 43 76 16, SW/NW 418790 4839206 5/5/2016 INAC GONE CTU25' Sticks/20'
~ Ranch (\> Nichols 5535 UNRA 43 76 16, SW/NW 418720 4839265 5/5/2016 INAC POOR CTU25' Sticks/20'
~ Ranch
g Nichols 5495 GOEA 43 76 21, NE/NW 419454 4837968 4/20/2016 ACTI GOEAin GOOD CTU50' Sticks/45'
Ranch nest
'ti Nichols 4497 UNRA 43 76 17, SE/SE 418438 4838503 4/20/2016 INAC GONE CTU55' Sticks/25' 0 Ranch ""I ~ Nichols 4498 UNRA 43 76 16, SE/SW 419268 4838365 4/20/2016 INAC GONE CTU50' Sticks/30' > ..... .....
Ranch 0 I
;:s ~
• • ......
WLR/ >-3 ID 00
BLMID Species1 status2. Sub/Ht3 §. w Unit Twn Rng Sec., qq/q Easting Northing Date Production Condition NestfHt 0 ......... l.11 Nichols 4499 UNRA 43 76 19, NE/NE 416802 4838238 4/21/2016 INAC POOR CTU45' Sticks/30' (1)
Ranch ?>-Nichols 4500 GOEA 43 76 20, NE/NE 418591 4837803 4/20/2016 INAC GONE CTU50' Sticks/40' -Ranch
,-... (")
Nichols 5487 RETA 43 76 19, NW/NE 416557 4837912 4/21/2016 INAC GONE CTU60' Sticks/50' 0 Ranch a Nichols 5494 GOEA 43 76 20, NE/NE 418662 4837768 4/20/2016 INAC GONE CLF Sticks s·
s::: Ranch (1)
Nichols 5511 GRHO 43 76 20, NE/SE 418271 4837232 4/20/2016 INAC GONE Tree Fell Sticks/35' _£::; Ranch, Nichols 5537 GOEA 43 76 17, SN/SE 418170 4838235 4/20/2016 INAC GONE Ranch Nichols 11945 UNRA 43 76 20, NW/SE 418259 4837251 4/20/2016 INAC POOR CTL Ranch Nichols 11946 BBMA 43 76 20, NE/SE 418676 4837265 4/20/2016 INAC GONE CTD BBMA nest Ranch Nichols 11947 UNRA 43 76 21, NW/NW 418751 4838059 4/20/2016 INAC POOR CTL Ranch Nichols 11948 UNRA 43 76 20, SE/NE 418580 4837806 4/20/2016 INAC GONE CTL Ranch Nichols 11949 UNRA 43 76 20, NE/SE 418100 4838187 4/20/2016 INAC POOR CTL Ranch Nichols 12757 GOEA 43 76 19, SEINE 417064 4837702 4/21/2016 INAC GONE CTU50' Sticks/40' Ranch Nichols 12963 UNRA 43 76 20, NE/SE 418630 4837317 4/20/2016 INAC POOR CTU50' Sticks/20' Ranch Nichols 12965 UNRA 43 76 19, SE/NE 417032 4837780 4/21/2016 INAC GONE CTU40' Sticks/30' Ranch Nichols 12967 UNRA 43 76 16, NW/SN 419028 4838833 5/5/2016 INAC GONE Tree fell Sticks/35'
Ranch
~ Nichols 13495 LOOW 43 76 20, NE/NE 418653 4837762 4/20/2016 INAC FAIR JUN/25' Sticks/15' i;::i Ranch ;:$ ~
t::i ~ ~
~ g ~ c
'""li i;::i > ...... ..... c I
;:$ Vl
Footnotes:
1 SPECIES CODES
BUOW = Burrowing Owl GOEA = Golden Eagle GRHO = Great Homed Owl LOOW = Long-eared Owl PRF A = Prairie Falcon RETA = Red-tailed Hawk TUVU = Turkey Vulture UNRA = Unknown Raptor BBMA = Black-billed Magpie
2 BREEDING STATUS
ACTI = Active INAC = Inactive
3 NESTING SUBSTRATE
CTD = Cottonwood Tree Dead CTL Cottonwood Tree Live CLF Cliff ROC = Rock Cavity JUL = Juniper Tree Live JUN = Juniper Tree
A.3.2 Greater Sage-grouse Lek Surveys
A-6
Eleven leks were surveyed three times between April 4 and May 5, 2016, by biologists from
Wildlife Resources, LLC, of Big Horn, Wyoming. Four of the leks (Hines NW, Windmill,
Windmill Satellite, and Pumpkin Buttes) were determined to be active in 2016. The remaining 7
leks were inactive. The Windmill Satellite lek had a peak male attendance
of 18 birds, compared to a peak of 15 males observed at the lek in 2015. The locations of the
leks are illustrated on Exhibit A. l and additional lek data is presented in Table A.2, respectively.
198305 Uranerz Energy Corporation
• • ......
Lek l.D. ~ I\!!!!. B.!!lt Easting Northing County lli!!!!. ~ Conditions ~ ~ ~ Airlground 1-:l \0 00 §. w Cottonwood 33, SE/NW 43 76 419386 4834409 Campbell 4/5/2016 7:05 AM Partly cloudy, 0-5 NW, 34 0 0 0 Ground o -Ul Creek 1
(1)
> 4/13/2016 6:48 AM Clear, 10-15 SSW, 44 0 0 0 Ground iv
5/5/2016 6:16 AM MosUy clear, calm, 51 0 0 0 Ground
"ti t""1 Cottonwood 33, NE/SW 43 76 419427 4834011 Campbell 4/512016 7:05 AM Partly cloudy, 0-5 NW, 34 0 0 0 Ground
'"1 0 .£. ()
Creek 1 Sat (1) ~ () ....... ~ ...... 0
4/13/2016 6:48 AM Clear, 10-15 SSW, 44 0 0 0 Ground N~
5/5/2016 6:16 AM Mostly clear, calm, 51 0 0 0 Ground OQ ,_. '"1 ?' (1)
~ (1)
Cottonwood 15, SE/SE 43 76 421621 4838450 Campbell 4/5/2016 6:40 AM Partly cloudy, 0-5 NW, 34 0 Ground ....,
I 00
Creek2 p:> oq
4/13/2016 6:19AM Clear, 5-10 SSW, 44 0 Ground (1)
0 5/512016 5:52 AM Mostly clear, calm, 51 0 0 0 Ground '"1
0 ~ 00 (1)
Cottonwood 3,SW/NE 42 76 421329 4832849 Campbell 4/512016 7:11 AM Partly cloudy, 0-5 NW, 34 0 0 0 Ground ~ (1)
Creek 3 :>;"
4/13/2016 6:56 AM Clear, 10-15 SSW, 44 0 0 0 Ground 00
5/512016 6:27 AM Mostly clear, calm, 51 0 Ground § 0.
2 Hines 16, NW/SE 43 75 429600 4838600 Campbell 4/5/2016 7:28AM Cloudy, 5-10 NW, 34 0 Ground g.
4/1312016 6:54AM Clear, 10-20 S, 45 0 0 0 Ground (1) '"1
5/512016 6:15 AM Mostly clear, calm, 51 0 0 0 Ground 0 ~
tti ::;· Hines NW 17, NE/NE 43 75 428443 4839637 Campbell 4/512016 8:19 AM Cloudy, 5-10 NW, 34 5 0 0 Ground 0.
~ 00
4/1312016 6:35 AM Clear, 10-20 S, 45 2 0 0 Ground 0 § cr'
5/5/2016 5:52 AM MosUy clear, calm, 51 0 0 0 Ground 00
~ (1)
~ '.;:! (1)
~ Dry Willow 34, SEINE 44 76 421648 4844290 Campbell 4/412016 7:00 AM Clear, Calm, 36 0 0 0 Ground p..
~ z ~
4/1212016 6:40 AM Clear, 0-5 SE, 44 0 0 0 Ground ....... g.
4/2112016 6:09 AM Clear, calm, 32 0 0 0 Ground 0
g -00
~ Windmill 2, SE/SE 43 76 423323 4841666 Campbell 4/5/2016 9:02 AM Cloudy, 5-10 NW, 34 2 11 0 Ground ~ 0 "I
()
!:) 4/13/2016 6:03 AM Clear, calm, 41 3 Ground :::r' ..... - > -· (fl 0 5/512016 5:3 9 AM Mostly clear, calm, 51 0 0 0 Ground I
;:i ~ .......:i
I
•• • • ......
Lek 1.D. ~ I!m furn. Easting Northing County lli!!!! Ii!!!!! Conditions ~ ~ Unknown Air/ground ,..,
'D 00 §. w WiminillSat 11, NE/NE 43 76 423429 4841417 Campbell 4/5/2016 6:34AM Cloudy, 5-10 NW, 34 12 3 Ground 0 ~ Vt >
411312016 6: 11 AM Clear, clam, 41 18 2 Ground iv 5/5/2016 7:00 AM Mostly clear, calm, 51 15 0 Ground
,,......, 0 0 ~
Wiminill North 35, SE/SE 44 76 423500 4843360 Campbell 4/412016 6:40 AM Clear, Calm, 36 0 0 Ground 1r (])
4112/2016 6:12AM Clear, 0-5 SE, 44 0 0 Ground c 4121/2016 5:44 AM Clear, calm, 32 0 Ground
Windmill NW 2,NE/SW 43 76 422599 4842051 Campbell 4/5/2016 6:20 AM Partly cloudy, 0-5 NW, 34 0 0 Ground
411312016 6:05AM Clear, 5-10 SSE, 44 0 0 0 Ground
5/512016 5:44 AM MosUy clear, calm, 51 0 Ground
P1mpkin Buttes 20, NE/SW 44 75 427450 4846946 Campbell 4/412016 7:18 AM Clear, cam, 35 3 0 Ground
4112/2016 6:11 AM Mostly Clear, 0·10 SW, 44 5 Ground
4121/2016 5:47 AM Clear, calm, 32 5 0 Ground
Gilbertz Ill 21, SE/SW 44 75 429307 4846518 Campbell 4/412016 7:31 AM Clear, cam, 35 0 0 0 Ground
4112/2016 7:02 AM MosUy Clear, 0-10 SW, 44 0 0 0 Ground
4121/2016 6:52 AM Clear, calm,32 0 0 Ground
Gilbertz Ill Sat 21,SW/SW 44 75 428960 4846700 Campbell 4/412016 7:37 AM Clear, calm, 35 0 0 Ground
~ 4112/2016 7:02AM Mostly Clear, 0-10 SW, 44 $::)
0 0 Ground
~ 4121/2016 6:50 AM Clear, calm, 32 0 0 0 Ground ~
t::l ~ Mud Spring 33, NE/NE 44 75 430151 4844662 Campbell 4/412016 7:41 AM Clear, calm, 35 0 0 0 Ground ~
~ Creek
4112/2016 7:08 AM Mostly Clear, 0-10 SW, 44 0 0 0 Ground
g 4121/2016 6:56 AM Clear, cam, 32 0 0 Ground
'ti 0 "I $::) > ..... -· 0 I
~ 00
•
Note: Some nests cannot be seen because of the scale of the map and proximity between nests.
2 -----========:iMiles 0 1.5 3 ----r::::====iKilometers
1:80,000 1 inch = 6,667 feet
USGS 30 x 60' Topographic Series: Kaycee (1978) and Reno Junction (1974). Wyoming
Greater Sage-grouse * Active Greater Sage-grouse Lek
* Inactive Greater Sage-grouse Lek
Raptor
Active Golden Eagle Nest
+ Active Great Horned Owl Nest
* Active Long Eared Owl Nest
Active Red-tailed Hawk Nest
• Inactive Nest
1---, 2 Mile Greater Sage-grouse Lek L---1 Search Area
c:::::::J 0.5 Mile Raptor Nest Search Area
c:J Permit Boundary
1 Uranerz \6 ENERGY CORPORATIO 1701 East "E" Street
P.O. Box 50850 casper, Wyoming USA 82605-0850
ExhibitA.1
Locations and Status of Ra tor Nests and Greater Sage-grouse Leks
G:\Pro·ects\198305\MXDs\Annual Re rt\ Ra tor GSG 2016R rt.mxd
Appendix F
Figures
------~ -
The 12 figures specifically referenced in the table of
contents have been processed into ADAMS.
These figures can be accessed within the ADAMS package or by performing a
search on the Document/Report Number.
~
~
i N I
Nichols Ranch & Hank ~ Nichols Ranch PA # 1
~ 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 .!.
~ ~ Production r ~
~ !l .!.
Groundwater Restoration r 'j
... ~ Wellfield & Site Reclamation ...-~ Nichols Ranch PA #2
Production i ... l Groundwater Restoration r i
~ ;e Wellfield & Site Reclamation r .!;
Hank PA#1 f ~
.._ Production ...-
.... Groundwater Restoration r
.... Wellfield & Site Reclamation r
Hank PA#2 ~
Production r
... Groundwater Restoration ...-
~
Wellfield & Site Reclamation r
Nole: Nichola Rench Unit ill dWided .,,o two production areas: Nichol$ Rench Production Aru 11 Mid Nictlols Ranch Produ'Clion Aree 12. Hlink Un~ is divk:led Into 2 prodl>Cllon aren: Hank ProduGlion Arff 11 111nd H1'"k Production A1et112 . Thia ls• p1ojected ntlmate lor Producl ion, RnlOftllion 9'ld Ree11Mn11Uon. Tl'le .:lu•t .chedule will depend on construction efficiency, actual production resullt and ..:Tuai re-storation of the gfOllndwaler.
'2 Uranerz ENERGY CORPORATION
1701 EAST"E" STREET P.O. BOX 50650 CASPER, WYOMING, USA 82005-0B50 PHONE 307.265.8900 FAX 307.265.8904
NICHOLS RANCH & HANK ISR PROJECTS PERMIT TO MINE #778
FIGURE 6 PROJECTED PRODUCTION, RESTORATION, AND
RECLAMATION SCHEDULE WDEQ-lQO ANNUAL RfPORT
DECEMBER 29, 201S · DECEMBER 28. 2016
By: A NJVL. /Dot•: 12·1S.2016
Oob.m: N/A IReWiion 0at.: 12-1s-201s
Scale: N/ A lowc1: Flgur.-a REV-s
Appendix G.
Performance Bond Estimate
•
<--~ Uranerz '\.C ENERGY CORPORATION 12.20.16
Surety Estimate 2016
Nichols Ranch In-Situ Recovery Project Uranerz Energy Corporation - an Energy Fuels Company
Total Restoration and Reclamation Cost Estimates
No. Cost Item 1 GROUNDWATER RESTORATION COST
2a PLANT EQUIPMENT REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL COST
2b BUILDING DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL COST
3 SOIL REMOVAL & DISPOSAL COST
4 TOTAL WELL ABANDONMENT COST
5 WELLFIELD EQUIPMENT REMOVAL & DISPOSAL COST
6 TOPSOIL REPLACEMENT & REVEGETATION COST
7 MISCELLANEOUS RECLAMATION COST
Subtotal Restoration and Reclamation Cost Estimate
8 Miscellaneous Items
Cost $3,085,754
$113,472
$1,307,665
$78,473
$561,537
$164,246
$90,769
$6,717
$5,408,633
Contractor Profit & Overhead (10%)1 · See Master Costs
Unknown Contigency (15%)2 $811,295 t--~~~~~~~~'--~I
TOTAL CALCULATED IN 2016 DOLLARS3 $6,219,928 t--~~~~~~~~'--~I
1, PerWDEQ/LQD Guideline No. 12, Section ll(B)(12)(b) 2
, Per WDEQ/LQD Guideline No. 12, Section ll(B)(12)(a) and (c-h), Section 11(8)(13) and NRC License Condition 9.5 3
, Costs reflect both WDEQ & NRC requirements. No salvage value assumed.
December 2016 Page G-1
Worksheet 1, No. I -GROUNDWATER RESTORATION
Cost Item Technical Assumptions
Wellfield Area (Ft2)
Wellfield Area (Acres) Affected Ore Zone Area (Ft2)
Avg Completed Thickness (Ft) Factorfor Flare Affected Volume: Porosity Gallons per Cubic Foot Gallon per Pore Volume Number of Wells in Unit(s)
Recovery Wells Injection Wells Monitor Wells
AveraQe Well Spacing (Ft) Average Well Depth (Ft)
I Groundwater Sweep A. Plant & Office
Operatina Assumptions: Flowrate (gpm) PV's Required Total Gallons for Treatment Total Kgals for Treatment
Cost Assumptions: Power
Avg Connected Hp Kwh's/Hp Gallons per Minute Gallons per Hour Cost per Hour Cost per Kgal ($)
Total Cost per Kgal Total Treatment Cost
Utilities Time for Treatment
Minutes for Treatment Hours for Treatment Days for Treatment Average Days per Month Months for Treatment Years for Treatment Utilities Cost($)
TOTAL PLANT & OFFICE COST
B. WELLFIELD Cost Assumptions:
Power Avg Flow/Pump (gpm) Avg Hp/Pump Avg #of Pumps Required Avg Connected Hp Kwh's/Hp Gallons per Minute Gallons per Hour Costs per Hour ($) Costs per Gallon ($) Costs per Kgal ($)
Total Cost per Kgal TOTAL WELLFIELD COST
TOTAL GROUNDWATER SWEEP COST
December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mining Unit i"'roaucuon noaucuon
Area #1 Area #2 (PA#1) (PA#2) Sub Total Notes
1,573,826 222,076 36.13 5.10 PA#1~8 Header Houses, PA#2-1 Header House
1,573,826 222,076 18.6 18.6 1.45 1.45
42,446,087 5,989,397 0.27 0.27 7.48 7.48
85,724, 118 12,096, 187
220 40 Recovery Wells for 8 Header Houses, PA#1 and 1 Header House, PA#2 397 81 Injection Wells for 8 Header Houses and 1 Header House PA#2
68 45 Monitoring Ring, Overlying, Underlying & Production Wells 100 100 550 550
150 150 1.00 1.00
85,724,118 12,096,187 85,724 12,096
20 20 0.83 0.83 150 150
9000 9000 $0.99 $0.99 $0.11 $0.11 $0.19 $0.19
$16,075 $2,268
571,494 80,641 9,525 1,344
397 56 30 30
13.2 1.9 1.10 0.16
$50,773 $7, 164 $66,848 $9,433 $76,281
14.9 14.9 Average flow of PA1for2 years (Bernard) 3.5 3.5 10 10 35 35
0.93 0.93 150 150
9000 9000 $1.97 $1.97
$0.0002 $0.0002 $0.22 $0.22 $0.30 $0.30
$25,378 $3,581 $92,226 $13,014 $105,240
Page G-2
Worksheet 1, No. II GROUNDWATER RESTORATION
Cost Item II REVERSE OSMOSIS (RO)
A. PLANT & OFFICE Operating Assumptions:
Flowrate (gpm) PV's Required Total Gallons for Treatment Total Kgals for Treatment Feed to RO (gpm) Permeate Flow (gpml Brine Flow (gpm) Average RO Recovery
Cost Assumptions: Power(RO)
Avg Connected Hp kWh/Hp Gallons per Minute Gallons per Hour Cost per Hour ($) Cost per Gallon ($) Cost per Kgal ($)
Total Cost per Kgal ($) Total Pumping Cost($)
Power (RO Brine to DOW) Avg Connected Hp kWh/Hp Gallons per Minute Gallons per Hour Cost per Hour ($) Cost per Gallon ($) Cost per Kgal ($)
Total Pumping Cost ($) Power (RO Permeate to Wellfield)
Avg Connected Hp kWh/Hp Gallons per Minute Gallons per Hour Cost per Hour ($) Cost per Gallon ($) Cost per Kgal ($)
Total Pumping Cost($) Utilities
Time for Treatment Minutes for Treatment Hours for Treatment Days for Treatment Average Days per Month Months for Treatment
Utilities Cost ($) TOTAL PLANT & OFFICE COST
B. WELLFIELD Cost Assumptions:
Power (wellfield to ROl Avg Flow/Pump (gpm) Avg Hp/Pump Avg# of Pumps Required Avg Connected Hp Kwh's/Hp Gallons per Minute Gallons per Hour Costs per Hour ($) Costs per Gallon ($) Costs per Kgal ($)
Total Cost per Kgal TOTAL WELLFIELD COST
TOTAL REVERSE OSMOSIS COST
December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mining Unit noauct1on noauct1on
Area #1 Area#2 (PA#1) (PA#2) Sub Total
150 150 6 6
514,344,706 72,577,122 514,345 72,577
750 750 600 600 150 150
80% 80%
180 180 0.83 0.83 750 750
45000 45000 $8.95 $8.95
$0.0002 $0.0002 $0.20 $0.20 $0.89 $0.89
$460,304 $64,952
20 20 0.83 0.83 150 150
9,000 9,000 $0.99 $0.99
$0.0001 $0.0001 $0.11 $0.11
$11,369 $1,604
190 190 0.83 0.83 600 600
36,000 36,000 $9.45 $9.45
$0.0003 $0.0003 $0.26 $0.26
$108,005 $15,240
685,793 96,769 11,430 1,613
476 67 30 30 16 2
$60,125.94 $8,603.50 $639,804 $90,400 $730,203
14.9 14.9 3.5 3.5 10 10 35 35
0.93 0.93 750 750
45000 45000 $1.96 $1.96
$0.00004 $0.00004 $0.04 $0.04 $0.12 $0.12
$61,987 $8,747 $70,734 $701,791 $99,146 $800,937
Notes
Page G-3
Worksheet 1, No Ill -GROUNDWATER RESTORATION
Cost Item 1111 Deep Disposal Well (DDW)
Operating Assumptions: Total Disposal Requirement
Total Gallons Total Kgallons Brine Concentration Factor Total Gallons Months of RO Operation Average Monthly Reqm't (Gallons) Average Flow (gpm)
Total DOW Disposal (gallons) Total DOW Disposal (Kgallons)
Cost Assumptions: Avg Connected Hp Kwh's/Hr:> Gallons per Minute Gallons per Hour Cost per Hour ($) Cost per Gallon ($) Cost per Kgal ($)
Total Cost per Kgallon TOTAL DEEP DISPOSAL WELL COST
December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mininc1 Unit 1-'roauct1on Proauct1on
Area#1 Area#2 (PA#1) (PA#2) Sub Total Notes
188,593,059 26,611,611 Total GWS Gallons+ RO Brine Flow !Total RO Flow X 20%) 188,593 26,612
1 1 188,593,059 26,611,611
28.9 4.1 6,526,843 6,526,843
150 150
188,593,059 26,611,611 188,593 26,612
150 150 0.83 0.83 150 150 Permitted max flow of 150 per well
9000 9000 $7.46 $7.46
$0.0008 $0.0008 $0.83 $0.83
$1.596 $1.596 $301,049 $42,480 $343,529
Page G-4
•
Worksheet 1, Nos. JV & VJ -GROUNDWATER RESTORATION
Cost Item
IV RESTORATION MONITORING Operating Assumptions:
Time of Restoration (months) Frequency of Analysis (months)
Quantity of Monitoring Wells Total Sets of Analysis
Total Sampling & Analysis Cost($)
V STABILIZATION MONITORING Operating Assumptions:
Time of Stabilization (months) Frequency of Analysis (months) Total Sets of Analysis Frequency of Analysis (months) Total Sets of Analysis
Cost Assumptions: Power ($/Month)
Total Power Cost Quantity of Monitoring Ring Wells Sampling & Analysis (each set) Quantity of Production Monitoring Wells Sampling & Analysis (each set)
Total Sampling & Analysis Cost ($) Utilities ($/Month)
Total Utilities Cost($) TOTAL STABILIZATION COST
Va DEEP DISPOSAL WELL MONITORING Operating Assumptions:
Time of Use (months) Frequency of Analysis (months) Total Sets of Analysis
Total Sampling & Analysis Cost($)
VI LABOR Cost Assumptions:
Crew: 1. Supervisor 2. Operators 3. Maintenance 4. Vehicles
Cost per Year Time Required - Years
TOTAL RESTORATION LABOR COST
December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch JSR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mining Unit Pro<1uct1on no<1uct1on
Area#1 Area#2 (PA#1) (PA#2) Labor Cost Factors
29 4 2 2
68 45 14 2
$14,280 $1,350
12 12 2 2 6 6 4 4 3 3
$0 $0 $0 $0 33 24
$10,626 $7,728 13 7
$390 $210 $11,016 $7,938
$0 $0 $0 $0
$11,016 $7,938
41 16 3 3
14 5 $6,461 $2,540
No. Hours/Year Cost
1 2080 $63,794 4 2080 $205,254 2 2080 $89,190 2 1040 $28,577
$386,816 2.41 0.34
$931,419 $131,429
Sub Total Notes
Monitoring Ring, Overlying & Underlying Wells Only
$15,630
Monitoring Ring Wells Only Monitoring Ring Wells Only Production Monitoring Wells Only Production Monitoring Wells Only
No add'i power required to sample
Monitoring Ring Wells Only
Production Monitoring Wells Only
No add' I utilities required to sample
$18,954
Restoration plus Stabilization Quarterly Analysis required by WQD permit
$9,002
$1,062,848 $1,097,432
Page G-5
Worksheet 1, Nos. VII, VIII & Summary-GROUNDWATER RESTORATION
Cost Item VII RESTORATION CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
I Deep Disposal Well(s) II Plug and Abandon DOW
Ill Reverse Osmosis Unit TOTAL RESTORATION CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
VIII RESTORATION OF EXCURSION WELLS I Shallow Sand Well(s)
Total Wells in Excursion Cost of Clean-Up
Total Shallow Sand Cleanup II Ore Zone Wells
Total Wells in Excursion Cost of Clean-Up
Total Ore Zone Cleanup Ill Deep Zone Wells
Total Wells in Excursion Cost of Clean-Up
Total Deep Zone Cleanup TOTAL WELLFIELD COST
TOTAL EXCURSION CLEANUP COST
SUMMARY: I GROUNDWATER SWEEP
II REVERSE OSMOSIS (RO) Ill DEEP DISPOSAL WELL IV RESTORATION MONITORING V STABILIZATION MONITORING
Va DEEP DISPOSAL WELL MONITORING SUBTOTAL
VI LABOR VII RESTORATION CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS VIII RESTORATION OF EXCURSION WELLS
TOTAL GROUNDWATER RESTORATION COST
December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mining Unit Proauct1on Proauct1on
Area#1 Area #2 (PA#1) (PA#2)
2 0 $212,115 0 $517,500 0 $729,615 $0
0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0
0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0
0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0
$105,240 $800,937 $343,529
$15,630 $18,954 $9,002
$1,293,291 $1,062,848
$729,615 $0
$3,085,754
Sub Total Notes
no new disposal wells needed for Nichols #2
Additional 500 gpm RO (purchase price) $729,615
Assume no excursions
$0
Page G-6
Worksheet 2 a PLANT EQUIPMENT REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL
Main Office& Process Maintenance
Cost Item Laboratory Building Building
Volume (Yds3) 40 200 45
Quantity per Truck Load (Yds3) 20 20 20
Number of Truck Loads 2 10 2.25
I Decontamination Cost
Area Decontaminated (Ft2) 105 308 114
Percent Reauiring Decontamination 20% 100% 20%
Total Decontamination Cost $80 $233 $86
II Dismantle and Loadina Cost
Dismantle Volume (Ft2) 105 308 114
Total Dismantle Cost $811 $2.370 $877
lll Oversize Cha es
Percent Re uirin Permits 40% 40% 40%
Total Oversize Cost $331 $1.656 $373
IV Transcortation & Disoosal
A. Landfill
Percent to be Shipped 100% 100% 100%
Distance fMiles1 150 150 150
Transoortation Cost $1,155 $5,775 $1,299
Quantity per Truck Load (Yds'J 20 20 20
Quantitv per Truck Load (Tons) 21.6 21.6 21.6
• Disposal Cost $2,030 $10,152 $2,284
Total Land~ll Cost $3,185 $15,927 $3,584
B. Licensed Site
Percent to be Shipped 0% 0% 0%
Distance (Miles) 1330 1330 1330
Transoort Cost $0 $0 $0
Quantity per Truck Load (Yds'J 20 20 20
Quantitv per Truck Load (Tons) 21.6 21.6 21.6
Unloadina Cost $0 $0 $0
Disoosal Cost 0 0 0
Total Licensed Site Cost $0 $0 $0
Total Transportation/Disposal Cost $3,185 $15,927 $3,584
OTAL COST NICHOLS RANCH MINE $4,407 $20,186 $4,919
• December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch !SR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Nichols Mine Unit
Resin+ Sand External Filter Media Tanks
110 109
20 20
5.5 5.45
207 205
0% 100%
$156 $155
207 205
$1.591 $1.581
0% 100%
$0 $2,256
0% 100%
150 150
$0 $3,147
20 20
21.6 21.6
$0 $5,533
$0 $8680
100% 0%
1330 1330
$22,688 $0
20 20
21.6 21.6
$4269 $0
26,402 0
$49,089 $0
$49,089 $8,680
$50,836 $12,673
Header Houses, Deep Well Manifold Bldgs Sub Total Notes
Accounts for 9 Header Houses - PA#1 - 8 and 190 10 PA#2-1.
20 20 All but the resin/sand media is going to landfill therefore any partial loads will be combined to make a full load: Landfill loads= 30.7, License Facility loads
9.5 0.5 = 5.5
297 42
100% 100%
$225 $32
297 42
$2.290 $322
40% 40%
$1,573 $83
100% 100%
150 150 round trio
$5,486 $289
20 20
21.6 21.6
$9,644 $508
$15,131 $796
0% 0%
1330 1330 round trio
$0 $0
20 20
21.6 21.6 Based on avg 80lbs per cf
$0 $0
0 0
$0 $0
$15,131 $796
$19,219 $1,232 $113,472
Page G-7
Worksheet 2 b -BUILDING DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL
Office &
cost Item Laboratory
STRUCTURE DEMOLITION & DISPOSAL
Demolition Volume (Ft1 90,000
Total Demolition Cost $29,205
Volume of Disoosal Material rcubic vardsl 1100
Weloht of Disnosa[ Material rtons) 264
ner Truck Load rronl 21.6
of Truckloads 122
Distance to Landfill 150
Transportation Cost $29 410
Total Disoosal Cost($) $12,408
TOTAL STRUCTURE DEMO & DISPOSAL $71,023
CONCRETE DECONTAMINATION, DEMO & DISPOSAL
Area (Ft2} of concrete pad 9000
Average Thickness (Ft} (concrete depth) 0.5
Volume (Ft3) of concrete pad 4500
Volume Footings, platforms, etc (Ft3l 579
Total Volume of concrete (ft3l 5079
Weight of Disposal Concrete 150lbs/cublc foot (reinforced concrete) 761,850
Weight of Disposal in Tons 381
Quantity per Truck Load (Ton) 21.6
Number of Truckloads 17.6
Percent Requiring Decontamination 0%
Area Decontaminated (Ff) 0
Decontamination Cost $0
Demolition Cost $3,168
Transportation & Disposal
A. Landfill
Percent to be Shipped 100%
Distance (Miles) 150
Transportation Cost $10,184
Quantity per Truck Load (Yds3) 20
Quantity per Truck Load (Tons) 21.6
Disposal Cost $17,903
Total Landfill Cost $28,088
B. Licensed Site
Percent to be Shipped 0%
Distance (Miles) 1330
Transportation Cost($) $0
Transport Cost $0
Quantity per Truck Load (Yds3) 20
Quantity per Truck Load (Tons) 21.6
Unloading Cost $0
Licensed Site Disposal Cost($) $0
TOTAL TRANSPORT & DISPOSAL COST $31,256
TOTAL BUILDING DEMO & DISPOSAL COST $102,279
December2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Nichols Mine Unit
Header Houses, Main Process Maintenance Manifold & Fuel
Building Building Island Pad
1,188.000 97 200 3.405
$385,506 $31,541 $1.105
14,520 1.188 42
3.485 285 10
21.6 21.6 21.6
161.3 13.2 0.5
150 150 150
$388.208 $31,763 $1,113
$163,786 $13,401 $469
$937,500 $76,705 $2,687
29700 5400 2566
0.5 0.5 0.5
14850 2700 1283
9351 972 0
24201 3672 1283
3,630,150 550,800 192,450
1815 275 96
21.6 21.6 21.6
84.0 12.8 4.5
29% 0% 10%
8,672 0 257
$8,846 $0 $262
$10,454 $1,901 $903
100% 100% 100%
150 150 150
$48,528 $7,363 $2,573
20 20 20
21.6 21.6 21.6
$85,309 $12,944 $4,523
$133,837 $20,307 $7,095
0% 0% 0%
1330 1330 1330
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
20 20 20
21.6 21.6 21.6
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$153,137 $22,208 $8,260
$1,090,637 $10,947
Personnel Deep Disposal Interim Lodging Well Bldgs. Sub Total Notes
780 1,008
$253 $327
10 12
2 3
21.6 21.6
0.1 0.1
150 150 round trio
$255 $329
$108 $139
$616 $795 $1,089,325
1-6 header houses @360 sq ft each, manifold is 246 sq ft., fuel island is
0 504 150sq ft
0.5 1
0 504
0 0
0 504
0 75,600
0 38
21.6 21.6 Partlal loads will be combined to make a full load: Landfill loads= 123.2, License
0.0 1.8 Facility loads =O
0% 100%
0 504
$0 $514
$0 $177
0% 100%
150 150 Round Trip
$0 $1,011
20 20
21.6 21.6
$0 $1,777
$0 $2,787
0% 0%
1330 1330 Round Trip
$0 $0
$0 $0
20 20
21.6 21.6 Based on avo BOlbs oer cf
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $3,479 $218,339
$616 $4,274 $1,307,665
Page G·B
• Worksheet3 SOIL REMOVAL & DISPOSAL
Office& Cost Item Laboratory
SOIL EXCAVATION, TRANSPORT & DISPOSAL
Removal Under Building Footprints
Excavation, Front End Loader $a
Quantity to be Shipped (Ft') a
Weiaht in Tons a
Quantity per Truck Load (Ton) 21.6
Number of Truckloads a.a
Distance (Miles) 133a
Transoortation Cost $a
Disposal Cost C$l $a
Unloading Cost sa
TOTAL SOILS EXC., TRANSPORT & DISPOSAL $0
TOTAL SOIL REMOVAL & DISPOSAL COST $0
December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Nichols Mine Unit
Header Houses,
Main Process Maintenance Manifold & Fuel Building Building Island Pad
$143 $a $12
7,425 a 642
371.25 a 32.a8
21.6 21.6 21.6
17.2 a.a 1.5
1330 133a 133a
$7a,898 $a $6,125
$57,637 $a $4,98a
$13,342 $a $1,153
$70,978 $0 $6,132
$71,121 $0 $6,145
Deep Disposal WellBldgs. Sub Total Notes
$7a.92/hrperWDEQ Guideline12and15a $2 cy/hr (2a16)
Assume removal of 3" of Contaminated Soil under structures where concrete foundations required decontamination, Disposal at a Licensed facility (fl3) (quantity
126 based on area of concrete pad provided on
6.3 worksheet 2b and multiplied by a.25 inches)
21.6
Partial loads will be combined to make a full load: Landfill loads= 0, License Facility loads=
a.3 19.B
1330 Round Trio
$1,203
$978 $63,594
$226 $14,721
$1,204 $78,315
$1,207 $78,473
Page G-9
Worksheet 4 --Well and Delineation Hole Abandonment
Cost Item
Number of Wells Average Depth (ft) Average Diameter (inch) Area of Annulus (ft2)
Materials Bentonite Chips Required (Ft3/Well) Bags of Chips Required/Well Cost/Well Bentonite Chips Gravel Fill Required (Ft3/Well) Cost/Well Gravel Fill Total Materials Cost per Well
Labor Hours Required per Well Total Labor Cost per Well
Equipment Rental Hours Required per Well Total Equipment & Operation Cost per Well
• Total Cost per Well
WELL ABANDONMENT COST
Number of Delineation Drill Holes Average Depth (ft) Sealing Drill Hole (ft) Site Grading/Contouring (per site)
Capping - precaste concrete cap (ea) Cost Per drill hole
Mobilization Delineation Drill Hole Abandonment
TOT AL WELL & DELINEATION ABANDONMENT COST
• December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mining Unit noaucuon J-'roaucuon
Area #1 Area#2 (PA#1) (PA#2) Sub Total
685 166 550 550
5 5 0.1364 0.1364
40.9 40.9 55 55
$292 $292
34 34 $23 $23
$314 $314
2 2 $33 $33 ,
1 1 $43 $43
$390 $390
$267,389 $64,798 $332,187
100 675
$ 3.30 $ 55.00
$ -$ 2,227.50 $ 1,100.00
$229,350
$561,537
Notes
Includes injection, recovery and monitor wells. See Worksheet 1, No.1, Plus 1 Plant water well and 1 domestic well. Added wells for PA#2
300 feet of clay above water
Avg depth less 300 feet filled w/ gravel
Backhoe and operator
Per Chpt 8 Noncoal rules and regulations a concrete cap or dry nonslurry materials may be used and is account for in sealing drill hole
Page G-10
Worksheet 5, No. I --WELLFIELD EQUIPMENT REMOVAL & DISPOSAL
Cost Item
I Wellfield Piping A. Removal
Total Number of Wells Feeder lines from HH to Injection wells 1" HOPE (Ft)
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mining Unit t'roaucuon noaucuon
Area #1 Area #2 (PA#1) (PA#2)
617 121 160,000 32,000
Pregnant solution feeder lines from production wells to HH 1" HOPE (Ft) 86,800 16,000 Total Quantity of 1" HDPE Piping (Ft) 246,800 48,000
Plastic Volume (Ft3) 809.37 157.33
Chipped Volume Assuming 30% Void Space (Ft3) 1,052.18 204.53
Disposal Weight (tons) 42.09 8.18
Quantity per Truck Load (Tons) 21.6 21.6
Total Number of Truck Loads 2 0.4
Total Lenath of Feeder line Trench (Fil 30,850 4,000 Total Cost for Trunkline Removal $80,210 $10,400
Total Cost - Removal $80,210 $10,400
8. Survev & Decontamination
Percent Requirina Decontamination 0 0 Loads for Decontamination 0 0 Cost for Decontamination ($/Load) $1,714 $1,714 Cost for Decontamination $0 $0
C. Transport & Disposal 1.) Landfill
a. Transportation Percent to be Shipped 0% 0% Loads to be Shipped 0 0 Distance (Miles) 150 150 Transportation Cost $0 $0
b. Disposal
Yds3 per Load 20 20 Disposal Cost $0 $0
Total Cost - Landfill $0 $0 2.) Licensed Site
a. Transportation Percent to be Shipped 100% 100% Loads to be Shioped 2 1 Tons to be Shipped 42.09 8.18 Distance (Miles) 1330 1330 Transportation Cost $8,037 $1,562
b. Disposal Disposal Cost $6,534 $1,270 Unloading Cost $92 $47
Total Cost - Licensed Site $14,663 $2,880 Total Cost - Transport & Disposal $14,663 $2,880
Total Cost - WF Piping Removal & Disposal $94,873 $13,280
December 2016
Sub Total Notes
Includes injection and recovery wells. See Worksheet 1, No.1 8 header houses & 1 HH for PA#2 8 header houses & 1 HH for PA#2
Thickness Based on WL Plastics Corp PSI 160 (R1=.05479', R2=.04425')
Based on 20 cy per truckload and 801bs per cf Partial loads will be combined to make a full load: Landfill loads= 0, License Facility loads= 2 Includes Shared Trenches - 8 header houses
$90,610
No survey or decon needed. Total volume to disposal
ERG (2016) $0
Round Trip $0
$0
Round Trip
$108,153
Page G-11
Worksheet 5, No. II WELLFIELD EQUIPMENT REMOVAL & DISPOSAL
Cost Item
II Production Well Pumps A. Pump and Tubing Removal
Number of Production Wells Cost of Removal Number of Pumps per Truck Load Weight of Pumps (lbs) Disposal Weight (Tons) Number of Truck Loads (Pumps)
B. Survey & Decontamination (Pumps)
Percent Requiring Decontamination Loads for Decontamination Cost for Decontamination
C. Tubing Volume Reduction & Loading Length per Well (Ft) Total Quantity (Ft) Disposal Weight (tons) Quantity per Truck Load (Tons) Number of Truck Loads
D. Transport & Disposal 1.) Landfill
a. Transportation Percent to be Shipped (Pumps) Loads to be Shipped Distance (Miles) Transportation Cost
b. Disposal Quantity per Truck Load (Yds3
)
Quantity per Truck Load (Tons) Disposal Cost
Total Cost - Landfill 2.) Licensed Site
a. Transportation Percent to be Shipped (Pumps) Percent to be Shipped (Tubing)
Loads to be Shipped Distance (Miles) Transportation Cost
b. Disposal Disposal Cost Unloading Cost Disposal Cost
Total Cost - Licensed Site Total Cost - Transport & Disposal
Total Cost - Pump Removal & Disposal
• December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mining Unit Proctuct1on l"'roctucuon
Area #1 Area #2 (PA#1) (PA#2)
220 40 $10,019 $1,822
180 180 12540 2280
6.27 1.14 1.22 0.22
0% 0% 0.00 0.00
$0 $0
300 300 66000 12000
11 2 21.6 21.6 0.52 0.09
0% 0% 0.0 0.0 150 150
$0 $0
20 20 21.6 21.6
$0 $0 $0 $0
100% 100% 100% 100%
1.74 0.32 1330 1330
$7,184 $1,306
$270 $49 $1,352 $246 $1-,622 $295 $8,807 $1,601 $8,807 $1,601
$18,826 $3,423
Sub Total Notes
From Worksheet 1 No I.
Assume 57 lbs/pump
Assume 20 T per truck
no survey as all to 11 e2 licensed facility
Round trip
Total loads this page: Landfill loads= 0, License Facility loads= 2.5. Partial loads will be combined to make a full load. Round Trip
$22,249
Page G-12
Worksheet 5, No. Ill WELLFIELD EQUIPMENT REMOVAL & DISPOSAL
Cost Item
Ill Buried Trunkline A. Removal
Length of Trunkline Trench (ft) Total Cost for Trunkline Removal
4" HPDE Trunkline PiPing Length (ft) Chipped Volume per foot of pipe (ft3/ft) Chipped Volume (ft3)
6" HPDE Trunkline Piping Length (ftl Chipped Volume per foot of pipe (ft3/ft) Chipped Volume (ft3)
8" HPDE Trunkline Piping Length (ft) Chipped Volume per foot of pipe {ft3/ft) Chipped Volume (ft3l
10" HPDE Trunkline Piping Length (ft) Chipped Volume per foot of pipe (ft3/ft) Chipped Volume (ft3)
14" HPDE Trunkline Piping Length (ft) Chipped Volume per foot of pipe (ft3/ft) Chipped Volume (ft3)
Total Chipped Volume (ft3)
Disposal Tons
Quantity per Truck Load (Tons)
Total Number of Truck Loads
8. Survey & Decontamination
Percent Requiring Decontamination Loads for Decontamination Cost for Decontamination ($/Load)
Cost for Survey & Decontamination
C. Transportation & Disposal
1.) Landfill a. Transportation
Percent to be Shipped Loads to be Shipped Distance (Miles) Transportation Cost
b. Disposal Yds3 per Load Disposal Cost
Total Cost - Landfill 2.) Licensed Site
a. Transportation Percent to be Shipped
Loads to be Shipped Tons to be Shipped Distance (Miles) Transportation Cost
b. Disposal Disposal Cost Unloading Cost
Total Cost - Licensed Site
• Total Cost Transportation & Disposal
Total Cost - Buried Trunkline Removal & Disposal
December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mining Unit noauct1on noauction
Area #1 Area#2 (PA#1) (PA#2)
8916 844 $23,181.65 $2,193.41
2,200 0 0.385 0.385
847 0
3,400 0 0.083 0.083
284 0
800 1,600 0.141 0.141
113 226
4,600 300 0.220 0.220 1,010 66
3,000 0 0.372 0.372 1,117 0 3,370 291
14 1
21.6 21.6
1 1
0 0 0 0
$1,714 $1,714
$0 $0
0% 0% 0 0
150 150 $0 $0
20 20 $0 $0 $0 $0
100% 100%
1 1 14 1
1330 1330 $2,676 $231
$2,175 $188 $776 $776
$4,851 $420 $4,851 $420
$28,033 $2,613
Sub Total Notes
more than one trunkline occupies a trench
$25,375.06
The various trunklines in this section represent the trunklines going from the CPP to the header houses and back.
8.3151b/ft per WL Plastics
No survey or decon needed. Total volume to low level disposal
ERG (2016)
Round Trip
Total loads this page: Landfill loads= 0, License Facility loads = 4. Partial loads will be combined to make a full load.
Round Trip
$25,375
Page G-13
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
•
Worksheet 5, No. IV WELLFIELD EQUIPMENT REMOVAL & DISPOSAL
Cost Item Mining Unit t'roaucuon t'roaucuon
Area #1 Area #2 (PA#1) (PA#2)
IV Manholes A. Removal
Total Quantity 8 2 Total Cost of Removal ($) $ 870.23 $ 217.56 Disposal Weight (Tons) 4.30 1.08
Quantity per Truck Load (Tons) 21.6 21.6 Total Number of Truck Loads 0.20 0.05
B. Survey & Decontamination Percent Requiring Decontamination 0% 0% Loads for Decontamination 0 0 Cost for Decontamination ($/Load) $1,714 $1,714 Cost for Survey & Decontamination $0 $0
C. Transportation & Disposal 1.) Landfill
a. Transportation Percent to be Shipped 0% 0% Loads to be Shipped 0 0 Distance (Miles) 150 150 Transportation Cost $0 $0
b. Disposal Yds3 per Load 20 20 Disposal Cost $0 $0
Total Cost - Landfill $0 $0 2.) Licensed Site
a. Transportation Percent to be Shipped 100% 100%
Loads to be Shipped 0.20 0.05 Tons to be Shipped 4.30 1.08 Distance (Miles) 1330 1330 Transportation Cost $1,020 $255
b. Disposal Disposal Cost $668 $167 Unloading Cost $155 $39
Total Cost - Licensed Site $1,689 $422 Total Cost Transportation & Disposal $1,689 $422
Total Cost - Removal & Disposal $2,559 $640
TOTAL WELLFIELD EQUIPMENT REMOVAL & DISPOSAL COST $144,291 $19,955
December 2016
Notes
Sub Total
$1,087.79
Based on 20 cy per truckload and 80lbs per cf
No survey or decon needed. Total volume to low level disposal
ERG (2016) $0
Round Trip
$0
Total loads this page: Landfill loads = 0, License Facility loads = 0.42. Partial loads will be combined to make a full load.
Round Trip
$1,088
$164,246
Page G-14
Worksheet 6, No. I
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
TOPSOIL REPLACEMENT & REVEGETATION Plant only
Cost Item Notes
I Process Plant and Office Building A Topsoil Handling & Grading
Affected Area (Acres) 5.2 Average Affected Thickness (Inch) 6
Topsoil Volume (Yds3)
topsoil stockpiled on site for replacement no 0 extra topsoil required
Sub Total - Topsoil $0 from worksheet 3 (Assume removal of 3" of Contaminated subsoil soil under structures where concrete foundation required
Replacement soil (Tons) 371 decontamination) Respread Cost for area $161.20 Sub Total - replacement soil $2,548 includes haul, placement and spread
B. Radiation Survey & Soil Analysis Sub Total - Survey & Analysis $8,878
C. Revegation Grading ($/Acre) $ 72.50 WDEQ-LQD Guideline 12A (Motor grader) 201 E Fertilizer ($/Acre) $202.60 BF Construction (2015) (Tractor/disk)
BF Construction (2015) seeding prep includes Seeding Prep & Seeding ($/Acre) $277.60 scarification (Tractor/disk)
BF Construction (2015) seeding prep includes Mulching & Crimping ($/Acre) $587.60 scarification (Mulcher/crimper used) Sub Total Cost/Acre $1,140.30 Sub Total Revegation
~IOIALPLANT AND OFFICE BUILDING $5,906
TOPSOIL REPLACEMENT & REVEG COST $17,333
December 2016 Page G-15
Worksheet 6, Nos. II & Ill TOPSOIL REPLACEMENT & REVEGETATION
Cost Item
II Wellfields A. Topsoil Handling & Grading
Affected Area (Acres) Average Affected Thickness (Inch)
Topsoil Volume (Yds3) Sub Total - Topsoil
Reolacement soil (Tons) Sub Total - replacement soil
B. Radiation Survey & Soil Analysis Sub Total - Survey & Analysis
C. Spill Cleanup
Affected Area (Acres) Affected Area (Ft2)
Affected Area Thickness <Fil Affected Volume (Ft3)
Quantity per Truckload (Ft3)
Quantity to be Shipped (Loads) Distance (Miles) Transportation Cost Handling Cost Disposal Cost Sub Total - Spill Cleanup
D. Revegation Grading ($/Acre) Fertilizer ($/Acre) Seeding Prep & Seeding ($/Acre) Mulching & Crimping ($/Acre) Sub Total CosVAcre Sub Total Revegation
Sub Total· Wellfields TOTAL WELLFIELDS COST
Ill Roads A. Topsoil Handling & Grading
Affected Area (Acres) Average Affected Thickness (Ins)
Topsoil Volume (Yds3) Sub Total - Topsoil
B. Radiation Survey & Soil Analysis Sub Total - Survey & Analysis
C. Revegation Grading ($/Acre) Fertilizer ($/Ac)
Seeding Prep & Seeding ($/Ac)
Mulching & Crimpina ($/Acl Sub Total CosVAcre Sub Total Revegation
D. Disposal of Road Material to Landfill Excavation, CAT ($/ft of road) Feet of Road Weight in Tons Quantity per Truck Load (Ton) Excavation Cost
Number of Truckloads Distance (Miles) Transportation Cost Disoosal Fee ($/Ton)
Sub Total - Roads TOTAL ROADS COST
December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mininc Unit noauctron
Production Area#2 Area #1 (PA#1) (PA#2) Sub Total
7 0.22 6 6
0 0 $0 $0
38.38 6.30 $246.75 $40.51
$12,518 $381
0.07 0
3049 0 0.25 0.25
762.3 0
540 540
1.4 0 1330 1330
$5,823 $0 $314 $0
$11,046 $0 $17,183 $0
$ 72.50 $ 72.50 $202.60 $202.60 $277.60 $277.60 $587.60 $587.60 $1,140 $1,140 $8,408 $254
$38,355 $635 $38,355 $635 $38,989
4.14 0.43 6 6
0 0 $0 $0
$7,102 $738
$72.50 $72.50 $202.60 $202.60
$277.60 $278
$587.60 $588 $1,140 $1,140 $4,725 $491
$1.73 $1.73 2,500 313
1 0.2 21.6 21.6
$4,317.50 $539.69
0.1 0.01 150 150
$33.42 $4.18 $4,351 $544
$16,178 $1,229 $16,178 $1,229 $17,406
Notes
Mine Plan Topsoil stockpiled onsite no replacement cost needed
from worksheet 3 (Assume removal of 3" of Contaminated subsoil soil under structures where concrete foundation required decontamination)
calculated that 10% of the affected acreage may require cleanup. No spills assumed in PA#2 as not in oroduction.
Partial loads from Worksheet 51V would be applied to a partial load from this worksheet. Round Trip
WDEQ-LQD Guideline 12A (Motor grader)2016 BF Construction (2015) BF Construction (2015) cost includes scarification BF Construction (2015)
2500 feet by 60 feet wide
Topsoil stockpiled onsite no replacement cost needed
WDEQ-LQD Guideline 12A (Motor grader) 2016 BF Construction (2015) (Tractor/disk) BF Construction (2015) seeding prep includes scarification (Tractor/disk) BF Construction (2015) seeding prep includes scarification (Mulcher/crimper used)
removal of constructed road materials WDEQ-LQD Guideline 12A (2016)
Total loads this page: Landfill loads= 0.11, License Facility loads = o. Partial loads will be combined to make a full load. Total Loads worksheets (2a, 2b, 3, 51, 511, 5111, 51V, 6 11&111): Landfill= 154, License Faciility= 35
Page G-16
Worksheet 6, Nos IV & V TOPSOIL REPLACEMENT & REVEGETATION
Cost Item IV Other
A. Topsoil Handling & Grading
Affected Area (Acres) Average Affected Thickness (Inch)
Topsoil Volume (Yds3)
Sub Total - Topsoil Replacement soil (Tons) Sub Total - replacement soil
B. Radiation Survey & Soil Analysis Unit Cost ($/Acre) Sub Total - Survey & Analysis
C. Revegation Grading ($/Acre) $ Fertilizer ($/Ac)
Seeding Prep & Seeding ($/Acre)
Mulching & Crimping ($/Acre) Sub Total Cost/Acre Sub Total Revegation
Sub Total - Other TOTAL OTHER COST
• TOTAL TOPSOIL REPLACEMENT & REVEGETATION COST (Total of 71 through 7V)
December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mining Unit Other Sub Total
5.97 0 6 6
0 0 $0 $0
$0 $0
$1,714 $1,714 $10,232.58 $0
72.50 $72.50 $202.60 $202.60
$277.60 $277.60
$587.60 $587.60 $1,140.30 $1,140.30
$6,808 $0 $17,040 $0 $17,040 $0 $17,040
$88,905 $1,863 $90,769
Notes
11 e2 Byproduct staging area DOW pads, manifold, silo area
Topsoil stockpiled onsite no replacement cost needed
Based on ERG (2016)
WDEQ-LQD Guideline 12a (Motor grader)2016 BF Construction (2015) (Tractor/disk) BF Construction (2015) seeding prep includes scarification (Tractor/disk) BF Construction (2015) seeding prep includes scarification (Mulcher/crimper used)
PageG-17
Worksheet 7, Nos I - VII MISCELLANEOUS RECLAMATION
Cost Item
I Fence Removal & Disposal
Quantity (Ft)
Cost of Removal/Disposal ($)
II Powerline Removal & Disposal
Quantity (Ft)
Cost of Removal/Disposal ($/Ft)
Cost of Removal/Disposal ($)
Ill Transformer Removal & Disposal
Quantity
Cost of Removal/Disposal ($/Each)
Cost of Removal/Disposal ($)
IV Culvert Removal & Disposal Quantity (Ft)
Cost of Removal/Disposal ($)
v Guardrail Removal
Quantity (Ft)
Cost of Removal/Disposal ($/Ft)
Cost of Removal/Disposal ($)
VI Low Water Stream Crossing
Quantity
Cost of Removal/Disposal ($/Each)
Cost of Removal/Disposal ($)
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS COST
December 2016
Surety Estimate Nichols Ranch ISR Project
Uranerz Energy Corporation
Mining Unit Nichols#1 Nichols#2 Sub Total
8,558 2,347
$3,577 $981 $4,558
160,460 136,810
$0 $0
$0 $0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
307 130
$1,517 $642 $2,159
0 0
$0.00 $0.00
$0 0 0
0 0
$0 $0
$0 $0 0
$5,094 $1,623 $6,717
Notes
Power to Wells, header houses. Other power already in place by CBM companies Lines buried in pipe trenches. Excavation costs covered on Sheets 61 and 6111. Assume salvage of wire at no cost.
Tri-County Electric will remove at no cost, WDEQ Guideline No.12, App. H
None
None
Page G-18
Master Costs
Analytical Costs Excursion (UCL) Parameters Guideline No. 8 DDW Monitoring Radiation Survey - Ground
Capital Costs Reverse Osmosis Unit (500 gpm)
Chemical and Material Costs Antiscalant Hydrochloric Acid Bentonite Chips Gravel Cement Cone
Equipment Costs
Utility Costs Electrical Kilowatt to Horsepower Efficiency- Downhole Pumps Efficiency - Surface Pumps Propane - Plant & Office
Quoted Costs Wellfield Pipeline Removal Trunk Line Removal Revegetation Costs-Seed (includes scarification) Revegetation Costs-Mulch Revegetation Costs-Fertilizer Revegetation Costs-Total
Waste Transportatio·n & Disposal Costs C&D Debris Transportation C&D Debris Disposal 11 e.(2) Byproduct Material Transportation 11 e.(2) Byproduct Material Disposal 11 e.(2) Byproduct Material Disposal 11 e.(2) Byproduct Material Unloading 11 e.(2) Byproduct Material Disposal (Type]) 11e.(2) Byproduct Material Disposal (Type II) 11 e.(2) Byproduct Material Disposal - soil Topsoil Haul/Place
Other Plant Repair and Maintenance Wellfield Repair and Maintenance DDW Repair and Maintenance DDW Plug and Abandonment Equipment Decontamination Equipment Dismantling and Loading Equipment Oversize Charge Concrete Decontamination Well Pump and Tubing Removal Handling spill clean up soil
Labor Costs Supervisor Operator Maintenance Laborer
WDEQ/LQD Guideline No. 12 Costs Vehicle Operation Backhoe w/out Operator ($/Hr) Loader (5.25 CY) Grading Operating Costs Fencing Removal Culvert Removal Culvert Removal Building Demolition - Mixture ofTypes Building Demo Disposal (Average) Concrete (Floor) Demolition - 6" Thick with Rebar Concrete (Footing) Demolition - 2' Thick, 3' Wide Drill Hole Abandonment Wet Exploration Holes >25 holes Incidental Costs: Small Site Grading and Seeding (<1 DOD sq. feet) Incidental Costs: Location Fee Incidental Costs: Mobilization Topsoil Respread (Cat 627) Grading (Motor Grader) Excavation (Cat)
Per WDEQ/LQD Guideline 12, Section ll(B)(12)(b)
•us DEPT. Of CONSUMER PRICE INDEX ADJUSTMENT 2013 to 2016
Consumer Price Index Multiplier (2013 to 2016)
December 2016
Appendix Table D-1 Table D-1 Table D-1
AppendixG Appendix H Appendix J AppendixJ AppendixK Appendix K Appendix K Appendix K Appendix L Appendix L Appendix L Appendix L Section 2 Section 2 Section 2
3.50% 1.0350
Rate($) CPI' s 30.00 NA s 322.00 NA s 474.00 NA $ 1,714.00 NA
Rate($) CPI' 500,000 $517,500
Rate($) CPI' s 0.609 NA s 0.01 NA s 5.30 NA s 18.00 NA s 6.76 NA
Rate($) CPI'
Rate($) CPI' 0.06 NA 0.746 NA 80% NA 90% NA
3,838.00 NA
Rate($) CPI' s 2.60 NA $ 2.60 NA s 277.60 NA s 587.60 NA $ 202.60 NA s 1,067.80 NA
Rate($) CPI' $ 0.18 NA s 47.00 NA s 0.14 NA s 135.00 $139.73 s 150.00 $155.25 s 750.00 $ 776.25 $ 180.00 $ 186.30 s 180.00 $186.30 s 350.00 $ 362.25 s 6.43 NA
Rate($) CPI' s 0.07 NA s 0.07 NA s 0.14 NA s 96,416.00 NA s 3.78 NA s 7.70 NA s 414.00 $ 428.49 s 1.02 NA $ 41.40 NA s 202.00 $209.07
Rate($) CPI' s 25.13 NA s 20.70 NA $ 18.87 NA s 16.38 NA
Rate($) CPI' s 12.49 NA s 19.93 NA s 70.92 NA $ 65.91 NA s 0.38 NA s 4.94 NA $ 98.89 NA s 0.295 NA s 9.71 NA s 0.320 NA s 0.76 NA s 3.00 NA s 50.00. NA s 10.00 NA s 1,000.00 NA s 0.79 NA s 65.91 NA s 1.57 NA
Profit&
Overhead' Units Source included analysis IML (2016) included analysis IML (2016) included analysis IML (2016) included acre ERG (2016)
Profit&
Overhead' Units Source included each
Profit&
Overhead1 Units Source included kgal GE Water & Process Technologies (2016) included kg al Operating Experience (2016) included bag Casper Well included cy Casper Well included each Casper Well
Profit&
Overhead' Units Source
Profit&
Overhead1 Units Source included kWhr Powder River Energy (2016) included Kw/HP included percent included percent included month Blakeman Propane (2016)
Profit&
Overhead' Units Source included ft- trench Wind Creek (2014) included ft - trench Wind Creek (2014) included acre BF Construction (2015) included acre BF Construction (2015) included acre BF Construction (2015) included acre BF Construction (2015)
Profit&
Overhead' Units Source included ton-mile Contract (2016) included ton Contract (2016) included ton-mile Contract (2016) included ton Contract (2016) included ton Contract (2016) included load Contract (2016) included ton Contract (2016) included ton Contract (2016) included ton Contract (2016) included cy 71 Soil & Rock (2015)
Profit&
Overhead' Units Source $ 0.08 kgal Operating Experience (2016) $ 0.08 kgal Operating Experience (2016) $ 0.16 kg al Operating Experience (2016) $ 106,058 well UIC 10-392 Permit (evaluated during 5 yr review by WQD)
included ft2 RS Means 2016 Building Construction Costs Data Included ft2 RS Means 2016 Building Construction Costs Data
$ 456.85 load included ft2 RS Means 2016 Building Construction Costs Data
$ 45.54 well Operating Experience (2016) $ 222.20 load
Benefits Units Source $ 30.67 hour Building Construction Prevailing Wages (2116/16) $ 24.67 hour Building Construction Prevailing Wages (2/16/16) $ 21.44 hour Building Construction Prevailing Wages (2116/16) $ 16.38 hour Building Construction Prevailing Wages (2/16/16)
Profit&
Overhead1 Units Source $ 13.74 hour Guideline (5/2016) $ 21.92 Guideline (5/2016) $ 78.01 hour Guideline (5/2016) $ 72.50 acre Guideline (5/2016) $ 0.42 foot Guideline (5/2016) $ 5.43 Guideline (5/2016) $ 108.78 20 ft CMP Guideline (5/2016) $ 0.32 ft3 Guideline (5/2016) $ 10.68 cy Guideline (5/2016) $ 0.35 ft2 Guideline (5/2016) $ 0.84 linear foot Guideline (5/2016) $ 3.30 foot Guideline (5/2016) $ 55.00 site Guideline (5/2016)
hole Guideline (5/2016) $ 1,100.00 project Guideline (5/2016) $ 0.87 cy Guideline 12A $ 72.50 acre Guideline 12A $ 1.73 ft Guideline 12A
G-19
Appendix H
CD of Electronic Data and Information
•
• ' ' _j