application to impose and use passenger facility … is des moines airport authority’s application...

Application to Impose and Use Passenger Facility Charges - #16

Submitted to: The Federal Aviation Administration

By: The Des Moines International Airport

Des Moines Airport Authority, 5800 Fleur Drive, Room # 201, Des Moines, IA 50321; T 515-256-5100; F 515-256-5025; www.dsmairport.com

June 23, 2017 Ms. Sheila Bridges PFC Coordinator FAA Central Region – Airports Division Airports Division Ace 615E 901 Locust Street Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 RE: DSM Passenger Facility Charge Application #16 Dear Ms. Bridges: Enclosed is Des Moines Airport Authority’s Application to Impose and Use Passenger Facility Charges in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 158. Should any additional information be needed in your review of this application, please contact me directly at 515-256-5389 or [email protected]. We appreciate your earlier assistance with the initial review of our application prior to the airline consultation and any assistance you can provide in working through the remainder of the process. Sincerely, Brian C. Mulcahy Director of Finance Enclosure

http://www.dsmairport.com/

mailto:[email protected]

PFC Application #16

Table of Contents

Section

1. FAA Form 5500-1 2. Assurances

3. Capital Improvement Program Budget

4. Attachment B

a. Runway 13/31 Reconstruction b. Runway 05/32 Reconstruction c. Airport Documentation Update d. Terminal Programming – Phase II

5. Airline Consultation

a. Consultation Meeting Notification b. Summary of Meeting c. Airline Response Letters

i. Airline #1 ii. Airline #2

6. Public Notice

OMB Approved 2120-0557 Exp. 8/31/2013

FAA Form 5500-1 (8-10) Supersedes Previous Edition

Federal Aviation Administration U. S. Department of Transportation

PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE (PFC) APPLICATION

1. Application Type (Check all that apply) FAA USE ONLY

a. Impose PFC Charges b. Use PFC Revenue c. Amend PFC No. ____________________

Date Received PFC Number _________________________ ________________________

PART I 2. Public Agency Name, Address, and Contact Person 3. Airport(s) to Use 4. Consultation Dates

Agency Name _Des Moines Airport Authority Address _5800 Fleur Drive, Suite 207 City, State, ZIP Des Moines, IA 50321 Contact Person Brian Mulcahy

Des Moines International (DSM)

a. Date of Written Notice to Air Carriers: July 5, 2017

b. Date of Consultation Meeting with Air Carriers: August 8, 2017

c. Date of Public Notice August 9, 2017

PART II 5. Charges a. Airport to Impose Des Moines International

b. Level c. Total Estimated PFC Revenue by Level

d. Proposed Effective Date: October 1, 2024

e. Estimated Expiration Date: October 1, 2026

$1.00 $2.00 $3.00

Impose Use

$4.00 $4.50

Impose $7,724,227 Use $7,724,227

PART III 6. Attachments (Check all that Apply)

Attached Submitted with Application Number Document a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i.

________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________

Airport Capital Improvement Plan Project Information (Attachment B) Air Carrier Consultation and Public Notice Information Request to Exclude Class(es) of Carriers Alternative Uses/Projects Competition Plan/Update ALP/Airspace/Environmental Notice of Intent Project Information ________________________________

PART IV 7. With respect to this PFC application I hereby certify as follows:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application are true and correct; This application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the public agency; The public agency will comply with the assurances (Appendix A to Part 158) if the application is approved; For those projects for which approval to use PFC revenue is requested, all applicable ALP approvals, airspace determinations, and environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act have been completed. If required, the public agency has submitted a competition plan in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 47106(f); and If required by 49 U.S.C. 40117(d)(4), adequate provision for financing the airside needs, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and gates, has been made by the public agency.

a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative Brian Mulcahy

b. Title Director of Finance

c. Telephone Number 515-256-5389

d. E-mail Address [email protected]

e. Fax Number 515-256-5025

f. Signature of Authorized Representative g. Date Signed

Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This form is the FAA’s primary source for collecting information for the authority to collect PFC revenue for airport development. This information is used to determine the eligibility and justification of airport development projects regarding safety, security, or capacity of the national air transportation system; or which reduce noise or mitigate noise impacts resulting from an airport; or furnish opportunities for enhanced competition between or among air carriers. It is estimated that it will take approximately 5-80 hours to fill out the application depending on the complexity. The use of the form is required to obtain FAA approval of authority to collect PFC revenue (49 U.S.C. 40117(c)). No assurance of confidentiality is necessary or provided. It should be noted that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number associated with this collection of information is 2120-0557. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC, 20591, Attn: Information Collections Clearance Officer, AIO-20.

of 2

Project Funding Source

FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Notes

Federal 11,731,590 - - - -

State - - - - - Local 1,303,510 - - - -

Total 13,035,100 - - - - Federal 928,800 - - - - State - - - - - Local 103,200 - - - - Total 1,032,000 - - - - Federal 108,000 - - - - State - - - - - Local 12,000 - - - - Total 120,000 - - - - Federal 6,100,533 - - - - State - - - - - Local 677,837 - - - - Total 6,778,370 - - - -

Federal 1,163,907 - - - - State - - - - - Local 129,323 - - - - Total 1,293,230 - - - -

Federal 1,821,488 - - - - State - - - - - Local 202,388 - - - - Total 2,023,875 - - - - Federal - 9,459,000 - - - State - - - - - Local - 1,051,000 - - - Total - 10,510,000 - - - Federal - 876,921 - - - State - - - - - Local - 97,436 - - - Total - 974,357 - - - Federal - 8,633,408 - - - State - - - - - Local - 959,268 - - - Total - 9,592,675 - - - Federal - - 17,036,100 - - State - - - - - Local - - 1,892,900 - - Total - - 18,929,000 - - Federal - - 2,079,000 - - State - - - - - Local - - 231,000 - - Total - - 2,310,000 - - Federal - - 720,000 - - State - - - - - Local - - 80,000 - - Total - - 800,000 - - Federal - - 2,610,000 - - State - - - - - Local - - 290,000 - - Total - - 2,900,000 - - Federal - - 393,210 - - State - - - - - Local - - 43,690 - - Total - - 436,900 - - Federal - - - 9,882,000 - State - - - - - Local - - - 1,098,000 - Total - - - 10,980,000 - Federal - - - 520,000 - State - - - - - Local - - - 60,000 - Total - - - 580,000 - Federal - - - 2,363,158 - State - - - - - Local - - - 262,575 - Total - - - 2,625,733 -

Phase III - Runway 5 Reconstruct - West of Intersection including R3/P3 RIM removal.

Includes removal of Twy R3 and P3 (Hotspot) and relocation of Twy P4 apron connector to meet design standards. Added Twy Delta area to assist in shifting of projects and keeping flow of traffic moving.

GA/FBO Phase II - Apron Paving of GA/FBO Apron and parking. 50' outside of the building is responsbility of the Airport.

Interior Service Rd - pavement to utilize for

fueling access

Interior access road for fuel trucks to gain access to Terminal ramp. Single lane w/ pulloff locations.

Phase IV - Design Runway 23 Reconstruct

Will include the design and relocation of Bravo to meet design standards. Show $90k funding for R.A.

Phase V - Reconstruct Runway 23,Bravo - East

of Intersection

Intersection safety area pavement reconstruct of Rwy 5/23 incl. (a)Discuss non standard option. Raise 23 end approximately 2'. This will also assist in Terminal elevation to maintain no elevation change within building. (b)Can aircraft be square to 23 off of Papa?

Design/Reconstruction Taxiway Papa

Includes design and CA/CO.

Building 35 - Demolition/Apron

RemovalRemoval of building/apron for future hangars/apron.

Terminal Apron "A" - Demolition of existing

buildings/apron. Phase II

Demolition of relocated FBO buildings and associated apron in preparation for new apron and Terminal building. Could shift this project to 2021 and occur with Apron A reconstruction.

Bring existing site up to grade, perform install of site utilities and fencing

Terminal Apron "A" - Design Phase I

Reconstructed apron/RON parking located at old East GA apron

Terminal Apron "A" - Reconstruction Phase III

Associated with demo of East GA complex.

Terminal Apron "B" - Design Phase IV

Centralized De Icing Pads and RON parking locations.

Relocation of existing hangar to allow master plan for relocations. Demolition is eligible. Anything above and beyond this responsibility of the Airport

Phase VI - 1,850 ft Runway 13 Rehab with

RSA of Intersection

Intersection safety area pavement reconstruct of Rwy 13/31 only. Compression seals on Twy Delta. Keep compressions joints seals separate. Show Div 1 & 2. Still AIP eligible.

GA/FBO Phase I - site development

Bld 33 - box hangar relocation

Phase I - Engineering Analysis Rwy 5/23, Phase

II - Design Rnwy 5 Reconstruct

Design of Bravo to meet standards is included.

Airfield Pavement Maintenance Program

Update

4 years since last performed. Beneficial for 5/23 programming & analysis.

Bld 34 - box hangar demolition

Demolition of this hangar as required per Terminal master plan. Hangar is at its end of life. Associated apron will be demoed as well.

FAA Fiscal Year 2018Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)

Des Moines International Airport (DSM)Date: 2/8/17

Telephone: 515-256-5160

of 2



FAA Fiscal Year 2018Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)

Des Moines International Airport (DSM)Date: 2/8/17

Telephone: 515-256-5160

Federal - - - - 5,940,000 State - - - - - Local - - - - 660,000 Total - - - - 6,600,000

Terminal AIP Annual Total Costs FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Totals21,854,318$ 18,969,329$ 22,838,310$ 12,765,158$ 5,940,000$ 82,367,114$

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,428,258$ 2,107,704$ 2,537,590$ 1,420,575$ 660,000$ 9,154,126$

24,282,575$ 21,077,032$ 25,375,900$ 14,185,733$ 6,600,000$ 91,521,240$

Runway AIP Annual Total Costs FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Totals12,768,390$ 10,335,921$ 22,445,100$ 10,402,000$ 5,940,000$ 61,891,411$

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,418,710$ 1,148,436$ 2,493,900$ 1,158,000$ 660,000$ 6,879,046$

14,187,100$ 11,484,357$ 24,939,000$ 11,560,000$ 6,600,000$ 68,770,457$



Federal -$ -$ State -$ -$ Local 550,000$ Total 550,000$ -$ -$ -$ Federal -$ -$ -$ -$ State -$ -$ -$ Local -$ -$ 22,500,000$ 22,500,000$ Total -$ -$ -$ 22,500,000$ 22,500,000$

PFC Annual Total Costs FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Totals-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

550,000$ -$ -$ 22,500,000$ 22,500,000$ 45,550,000$ 550,000$ -$ -$ 22,500,000$ 22,500,000$ 45,550,000$

Terminal Apron "B" - Reconstruction Phase IV

Centralized De Icing Pads and RON parking locations.

FederalState

FederalState LocalTotal

Passenger Facility Charge Projects

Terminal Area Environmental

AssessmentPFC Funds

Local

Terminal DesignEntitlement funding only can be used (cargo cannot be

used)

FederalState LocalTotal

Total

Des Moines International Airport

PFC Application 16

Project PFC Request

Runway 13‐31 (PH VI) 1,303,510

Runway 05‐23 (PH I through V) and Apron 3,789,226

Airport Documentation Update 239,722

Terminal Programming 2,391,769

Total 7,724,227$

PFC Application #16 TOTAL

Reconstruction of 13/31 Phase VI $1,303,510.00

Project Reconstruction of 13/31 Phase VI

Total Cost Entitlement Discretionary Local PFC Request

Phase VI ‐ 1850 ft Runway 13 13,035,100 4,411,772 7,319,818 1,303,510 1,303,510

13,035,100 4,411,772 7,319,818 1,303,510 1,303,510

AIP Grant

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: DSM PFC Application #16 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Runway 13/31 Reconstruction Phase VI 2. Project Number 3. Use Airport of Project: Des Moines International (DSM) 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [ X ] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [ ] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ X ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $ 1,303,510 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $ 1,303,510 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: 2018 Entitlement $4,411,772 Discretionary $ 7,319,818 Total $ 11,731,590 Fiscal Year: Entitlement $0 Discretionary $ 0 Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $ 11,731,590

Revised 8/31/2010

Other Funds: State Grants $ Local Funds Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: Total Project Cost: $13,035,100 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: The 2018 portion of this project consists of reconstruction of runway 13/31. If discretionary AIP funding is not available for work to be completed, the construction will be delayed until adequate entitlement money is available to complete the project. If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description:

Reconstruct 1,850 ft Runway 13 end and reconstruct safety area pavement at intersection of Runway 5/23 and 13/31, Taxiway D Compression Seals. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates.

Revised 8/31/2010

[ X ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules.

Revised 8/31/2010

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance the safety of Des Moines International Airport by ensuring the runway environment meets the FAA specifications. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: As detailed in the Functional Design Report for Runway 13/31 completed in 2014, Runway 13/31 has deteriorating pavement, profile that does not meet standards, and drainage and lighting systems that are failing. As part of this project approximately 1,850 ft of the 13 end of the runway will be reconstructed. Included with this project the full depth reconstruction of the safety area of Runway 5/23 within the intersection of Runways 13/31. The blast pad, and portions of Taxiway D6 will be reconstructed to allow for elevation adjustments. Project includes grading, drainage, lighting, markings along with the pavement improvements. Compression sealing of joints on this section of the runway as well as along Taxiway D will be performed as part of this project as well. It is anticipated that the MALSR lights may require elevation adjustment. Also includes cost of construction administration, observation, and material testing services.

Revised 8/31/2010

FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): April 2018 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): November 2018 For FAA Use

Revised 8/31/2010

For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ X ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ X ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ X ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement

Revised 8/31/2010

List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed.

Revised 8/31/2010

__________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

CIP DATA SHEET

FAA USE ONLY PREAPP NUMBER GRANT NUMBER NPIAS CODE WORK CODE FAA PRIORITY FEDERAL $

AIRPORT Des Moines International Airport LOCID DSM LOCAL PRIORITY

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Reconstruct 1,850 ft Runway 13 end and reconstruct safety area pavement at intersection of Runway 5/23 and 13/31, Taxiway D Compression Seals

Identify FFY that you desire to construct (FFY: Oct. 1-Sept. 30)

FY2018

SKETCH:

JUSTIFICATION: As detailed in the Functional Design Report for Runway 13/31 completed in 2014, Runway 13/31 has deteriorating pavement, profile that does not meet standards, and drainage and lighting systems that are failing. As part of this project approximately 1,850 ft of the 13 end of the runway will be reconstructed. Included with this project the full depth reconstruction of the safety area of Runway 5/23 within the intersection of Runways 13/31. The blast pad, and portions of Taxiway D6 will be reconstructed to allow for elevation adjustments. Project includes grading, drainage, lighting, markings along with the pavement improvements. Compression sealing of joints on this section of the runway as well as along Taxiway D will be performed as part of this project as well. It is anticipated that the MALSR lights may require elevation adjustment. Also includes cost of construction administration, observation, and material testing services.

COST ESTIMATE: (Attach detailed cost estimate) Federal (90%) $11,731,590 State $0 Local (10%) $1,303,510 Total $13,035,100 SPONSOR’S VERIFICATION: Date

For each and every project as applicable

2015 - Date of approved ALP with project shown

#310 - Date of environmental determination (ROD, FONSI, CE), or cite CE

paragraph # (307-312) in Order 1050.1E NA - Date of land acquisition or signed purchase agreement

FAA USE ONLY 2014 - Date of pavement maintenance program

FAA Verification: (initial/date) NA - Snow removal equipment inventory & sizing worksheet (for SRE acquisition) NA - Apron sizing worksheet (for apron projects)

- Revenue producing facilities (for fuel farms, hangers, etc.) NA - Date statement submitted for completed airside development NA - Date statement submitted for runway approaches are clear of obstructions

SPONSOR’S SIGNATURE: DATE:

PRINTED NAME: Bryan Belt TITLE: Director of Engineering and Planning

PHONE NUMBER: (515) 256-5160

Intersection RSA Reconstruct

Taxiway D Compression Seals

Runway 13 End Reconstruction

1 P-101 AIRFIELD PAVEMENT REMOVAL, LESS THAN 12" THICKNESS SY $ 6.30 12,679 $ 79,877.70

2 P-101 AIRFIELD PAVEMENT REMOVAL, GREATER THAN 12" THICKNESS SY $ 10.00 33,500 $ 335,000.00

3 DRAINAGE PIPE REMOVAL, SUBDRAIN LF $ 2.40 15,000 $ 36,000.00

4 DRAINAGE PIPE REMOVAL, LESS THAN 24 INCHES LF $ 63.00 1,000 $ 63,000.00

5 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE REMOVAL EA $ 1,250.00 2 $ 2,500.00

6 D-701 30 INCH CLASS III RCP LF $ 210.00 1,000 $ 210,000.00

7 D-705 NON-PERFORATED SUBDRAIN, 6" DIA. LF $ 19.00 2,000 $ 38,000.00

8 D-705 PERFORATED SUBDRAIN, 6" DIA. LF $ 18.00 15,000 $ 270,000.00

9 D-705 SUBDRAIN CLEANOUT EA $ 525.00 20 $ 10,500.00

10 D-705 SUBDRAIN CONNECTION TO EXISTING STRUCTURE OR PIPE EA $ 580.00 6 $ 3,480.00

11 D-751 SW-401 SINGLE INTAKE EA $ 7,400.00 1 $ 7,400.00

12 P-152 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION CY $ 7.50 35,000 $ 262,500.00

13 P-158 CEMENT SUBGRADE TREATMENT SY $ 4.20 43,500 $ 182,700.00

P-157 CEMENT TON $ 160.00 500 $ 80,000.00

14 P-208 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, VAR. THICKNESS, 0 TO 11.5 INCHES SY $ 9.50 10,250 $ 97,375.00

15 P-219 RECYCLED CONCRETE AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 8" SY $ 5.80 43,500 $ 252,300.00

16 P-156STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PREPARATION AND MANAGEMENT LS $ 20,000.00 1 $ 20,000.00

17 P-156 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE EA $ 210.00 2 $ 420.00

18 P-156 WATTLES LF $ 2.90 4,000 $ 11,600.00

19 P-307 DRAINABLE BASE COURSE, 6" SY $ 19.00 33,500 $ 636,500.00

20 P-403 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE TON $ 315.00 1,500 $ 472,500.00

21 P-501 10" PCC SHOULDER PAVEMENT SY $ 47.00 10,250 $ 481,750.00

22 P-501 16" PCC PAVEMENT SY $ 68.00 33,500 $ 2,278,000.00

P-604 COMPRESSION JOINT SEALANT LF $ 3.15 50,000 $ 157,500.00

23 P-620 PAVEMENT MARKINGS - RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY PAINT SF $ 1.90 60,000 $ 114,000.00

24 P-621 SAW CUT GROOVING SY $ 2.10 26,700 $ 56,070.00

25 L-108-1 No. 6 AWG, 5KV, L-824C CABLE, INSTALLED IN CONDUIT LF $ 2.40 9,000 $ 21,600.00

26 L-108-2NO. 6 AWG, BARE SOLID COUNTERPOISE WIRE WITH GROUND RODS AND EXOTHERMIC CONNECTIONS LF $ 2.10 6,000 $ 12,600.00

27 L-110-1 1 WAY 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC IN NEW SHOULDER PAVEMENT LF $ 8.50 3,900 $ 33,150.00

28 L-110-2 1 WAY 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DUCT, CONCRETE ENCASED LF $ 8.50 1,800 $ 15,300.00

29 L-125-1 L-850A RUNWAY CENTERLINE / TDZ LIGHT EA $ 2,100.00 37 $ 77,700.00

30 L-125-3 L-862 RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT EA $ 1,400.00 28 $ 39,200.00

31 L-125-4 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL TAXIWAY LIGHTS EA $ 1,200.00 16 $ 19,200.00

32 L-125-5 L-858 LED SIGN UNIT - 1 MODULE EA $ 5,700.00 2 $ 11,400.00

33 L-125-6 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION LS $ 50,000.00 1 $ 50,000.00

34 ADJUST MALSR STATIONS LS $ 168,000.00 1 $ 168,000.00

35 REPLACE RUNWAY PAVEMENT SENSORS EA $ 17,000.00 1 $ 17,000.00

36 T-901 SEEDING AND FERTILIZING ACRE $ 1,600.00 14 $ 22,320.00

37 T-904 SODDING SY $ 8.00 2,000 $ 16,000.00

38 T-905 TOPSOILING CY $ 6.00 7,750 $ 46,500.00

39 T-908 MULCHING ACRE $ 1,600.00 14 $ 22,320.00

40 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS LS $ 80,000.00 1 $ 80,000.00

41 TRAFFIC CONTROL/SECURITY LS $ 140,000.00 1 $ 140,000.00

42 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY LS $ 60,000.00 1 $ 60,000.00

43 MOBILIZATION AND MISCELLANEOUS LS $ 500,000.00 1 $ 500,000.00

$7,511,263

$600,901

$8,112,164Rounded $8,112,000

RECONSTRUCT 1,850 FT RUNWAY 13 END

DES MOINES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTRUNWAY 13/31 RECONSTRUCTION

Subtotal Runway Construction Costs

October 25, 2016

ITEM NO.ITEM CODE

ITEM UNIT

********* NEED TO ADD INTERSECTION RSA RECONSTRUCT ***********

Engineering, Construction Admin, Legal, Administration (8%)

Total Opinion of Probable Project Costs

UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL

c:\pw_workdir\pw_ie\cmw1\dms89696\FY18_Runway 13 End and RSA Reconstruct.xlsx10/27/2016

FOTH ie8191 BIRCHWOOD CT, SUITE L

JOHNSTON, IOWA 50131

1 P-101 SAWCUTTING LF $ 13.44 55,000 $ 739,200.00



4 TEMPORARY CRANE MAT SY $ 28.00 7,500 $ 210,000.00

5 SUBGRADE SEPARATION LAYER SY $ 3.36 7,500 $ 25,200.00

6 P-209 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 10" SY $ 28.00 7,500 $ 210,000.00

7 P-501 17" PCC PAVEMENT, ACCELERATED STRENGTH SY $ 224.00 7,500 $ 1,680,000.00

8 P-620 RUNWAY PAVEMENT MARKINGS LS $ 11,200.00 1 $ 11,200.00


10 No. 6 AWG, 5KV CABLE LF $ 3.36 6,000 $ 20,160.00

11 L-110-2 1 WAY 2" RGS DUCT LF $ 13.44 2,500 $ 33,600.00


13 L-125-2 L-850C BIDIRECTIONAL IN-PAVEMENT RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT EA $ 2,800.00 2 $ 5,600.00

14 L-125-3 L-862 RUNWAY/TAXIWAY EDGE LIGHT EA $ 1,512.00 14 $ 21,168.00





$3,877,328

$387,733

$4,265,061Rounded $4,265,000

RECONSTRUCT RUNWAY INTERSECTION SAFETY AREA (not bullseye) with PCC (overlay NOT INCLUDED)


January 8, 2015

ITEM NO.ITEM CODE

ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE


QUANTITY TOTAL


Construction Admin, Legal, Administration (10%)

c:\pw_workdir\pw_ie\cmw1\dms89696\FY18_Runway 13 End and RSA Reconstruct.xlsx10/27/2016



PHASE 1 TWY D6 TO RWY 23/5 SAFETY AREATwy D

1 MOBILIZATION LS $ 25,000.00 1 $ 25,000.00

2 TRAFFIC CONTROL / SECURITY LS $ 10,000.00 1 $ 10,000.00

3 E-816, 1/2" - 5/8" CONTRACTION AND CONSTRUCTION JOINTS LF $ 3.75 63,471 $ 238,016.25


5 V-1625, EXPANSION JOINTS LF $ 8.15 1,866 $ 15,207.90

Twy D Shoulder



5 V-1625, EXPANSION JOINTS LF $ 8.15 0 $ -

Arm/De-Arm Pad


4 E-1006, 5/8" - 3/4" CONTRACTION AND CONSTRUCTION JOINTS LF $ 4.00 549 $ 2,196.00

Twy B



5 V-1625, EXPANSION JOINTS LF $ 8.15 316 $ 2,575.40

$566,359

$56,636

$35,000

$658,000

FY2018 COST ESTIMATE

DES MOINES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTTWY DELTA COMPRESSION SEAL

ITEM NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY

October 18th, 2016

Subtotal Phase 1 Construction Costs

Construction Contingency (10%)

Engineering, Construction Admin, Legal, Administration

Phase 1 Opinion of Probable Project Costs

UNIT PRICE TOTAL

c:\pw_workdir\pw_ie\cmw1\dms89696\FY18 Estimate_TwyD Compression Seal.xls11/21/2016




Reconstruction of 05/23 and Terminal Apron $3,789,226.00

Project Reconstruction of 05/23 and Terminal Apron


Phase I & II ‐ Engineering Analysis 1,032,000 ‐ 928,800 103,200 103,200

and Design of RNW 23 Reconstruct

Phase III ‐ Reconstruction of RNW 5 10,510,000 4,411,772 5,047,228 1,051,000 1,051,000

West of Intersection

Phase IV ‐ Design RNW 5 Reconstruct 974,357 ‐ 876,921 97,436 97,436

and Reimburseable Agreement

Phase V ‐ Reconstruct RNW 23 East 18,929,000 4,411,772 12,624,328 1,892,900 1,892,900

of Intersection

Papa Taxiway Design and 2,310,000 ‐ 2,079,000 231,000 231,000

Reconstruction

Terminal Apron Phase I Design 800,000 720,000 80,000 80,000

Terminal Apron Phase II ‐ Demo/Replace 2,900,000 2,610,000 290,000 290,000

Interior Service Road 436,900 393,210 43,690 43,690

37,892,257 8,823,544 25,279,487 3,789,226 3,789,226

AIP Grant

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: DSM PFC Application #16 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Reconstruction of Runway 05/23 and Terminal Apron 2. Project Number 3. Use Airport of Project: Des Moines International (DSM) 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [ X ] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [ ] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ X ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $ 3,789,226 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $ 3,789,226 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: 2018 Entitlement $ Discretionary $ 928,800 Total $ 928,800 Fiscal Year: 2019 Entitlement $4,411,772 Discretionary $ 5,924,149 Total $ 10,335,921

Revised 8/31/2010

Fiscal Year: 2020 Entitlement $4,411,772 Discretionary $ 18,426,538 Total $ 22,838,310 Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $ 34,103,031 Other Funds: State Grants $ Local Funds Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: Total Project Cost: $ 37,892,257 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO

Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: The reconstruction of Runway 05/23 and Terminal Apron relies on entitlement and discretionary AIP funding. If discretionary AIP funding is not available for work to be completed, the construction will be delayed until adequate entitlement money is available to complete the project. If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description:

This project includes reconstruction of a portion of Runway 05/23 and Terminal Apron during 2018, 2019 and 2020. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters:

Revised 8/31/2010

Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ X ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ]

Revised 8/31/2010

Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance the safety of Des Moines International Airport by ensuring the runway environment meets the FAA specifications. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project includes the reconstruction of a portion of Runway 5/23 and Terminal Apron. Project also includes replacement of Taxiway B pavement between Papa and Runway 5/23 in order to remove the direct connection of the terminal apron to the runway. Work consists of removal and replacement of existing pavement, construction of paved shoulders, and installation of edge lighting, guidance signs, grading, drainage, pavement markings and miscellaneous related work items. This section of Runway 5/23 has exceeded its design life and is

Revised 8/31/2010

comprised of deteriorated pavement. The PCI Report completed in 2014 shows a PCI rating between 47 and 70 on the proposed limits of the Taxiway P reconstruction. These issues will be resolved under this project. Project includes the overlay / HMA transition pavement on Taxiway P and P1. It is anticipated that the Runway 23 end will be raised by 4 feet. Therefore, this HMA pavement will act as a transition between Runway 23 end, Taxiway Papa, and the current elevation of the terminal apron. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.

Revised 8/31/2010

Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): April 2018 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): November 2020 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ X ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ X ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level.

Revised 8/31/2010

c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ X ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination.

Revised 8/31/2010

Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

CIP DATA SHEET



PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Engineering Analysis of Entire Runway 5/23, Design of Runway 5/23 Reconstruction – West of Intersection


FY2018

JUSTIFICATION: Portions of Runway 5/23 pavement condition is nearing the threshold where major rehabilitation or reconstruction will be required. Project to identify issues with current runway and develop plan for future rehabilitation/reconstruction projects. Once the analysis is completed, the design of 1,330 LF of Runway 5/23 west of the intersection to Runway 13/31 will be completed. Work consists of removal and replacement of existing pavement, construction of paved shoulders, installation of edge lighting, guidance signs, grading, drainage, pavement markings, etc. This section of Runway 5/23 has exceeded its design life and is comprised of deteriorated pavement. These issues will be resolved under this project. Also, as addressed on the Airport Facility Diagram, Taxiway R3 is referred to as Hot Spot 1. In order to remove the Hot Spot, Taxiway R3 and Taxiway P3 is being removed. The PCI on this pavement ranges between 57 and 67, as addressed in the 2014 PCI Report. Project also includes reconstruction of the Taxiway Delta Intersection to Runway 5/23 along with an asphalt transition area to transition to existing runway profile. Project also includes the reconstruction of a portion of Taxiway P4 in order to eliminate the direct access to Runway 5/23 from the South Tee Hangar Apron. COST ESTIMATE: (Attach detailed cost estimate)

Design: Federal (90%) $613,800 State $0 Local (10%) $68,200 Total $682,000 Eng. Analysis: Federal (90%) $315,000 State $0 Local (10%) $35,000 Total $350,000

SPONSOR’S VERIFICATION: Date






FAA Verification: (initial/date) NA - Snow removal equipment inventory & sizing worksheet (for SRE acquisition) NA - Apron sizing worksheet (for apron projects) - Revenue producing facilities (for fuel farms, hangers, etc.) NA - Date statement submitted for completed airside development NA - Date statement submitted for runway approaches are clear of obstructions

SPONSOR’S SIGNATURE: DATE: PRINTED NAME: Bryan Belt TITLE: Director of Engineering and Planning PHONE NUMBER: (515) 256-5160

Remove Twy R3

Remove Twy R3

Reconstruct Twy D Intersection

Reconstruct Approximately 1,330 LF of Runway 5/23

Remove/Reconstruct Taxiway P4

CIP DATA SHEET



PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Runway 5/23 Reconstruction – West of Intersection, Remove Taxiway R3 & Taxiway P3, Remove/Reconstruct Taxiway P4 and Taxilane to South Cargo Apron


FY2019

SKETCH:

JUSTIFICATION: This project includes the reconstruction of a portion of Runway 5/23 (1,330 LF). Work consists of removal and replacement of existing pavement, construction of paved shoulders, installation of edge lighting, guidance signs, grading, drainage, pavement markings, compression joint sealant, etc. This section of Runway 5/23 has exceeded its design life and is comprised of deteriorated pavement. These issues will be resolved under this project. Also, as addressed on the Airport Facility Diagram, Taxiway R3 is referred to as Hot Spot 1. In order to remove the Hot Spot, Taxiway R3 and Taxiway P3 is being removed. The PCI on this pavement ranges between 57 and 67, as addressed in the 2014 PCI Report. Project also includes reconstruction of the Taxiway Delta Intersection to Runway 5/23 along with an asphalt transition area to transition to existing runway profile. Project also includes the reconstruction of a portion of Taxiway P4 in order to eliminate the direct access to Runway 5/23 from the South Tee Hangar Apron.

COST ESTIMATE: (Attach detailed cost estimate) Federal (90%) $9,459,000 State $0 Local (10%) $1,051,000 Total $10,510,000










Remove Twy R3

Remove Twy P3

Reconstruct Twy D Intersection

Remove/Reconstruct Taxiway P4

1 P-101 AIRFIELD PAVEMENT REMOVAL, LESS THAN 12" THICKNESS SY 6.96 9,300 $ 64,728.00

2 P-101 AIRFIELD PAVEMENT REMOVAL, GREATER THAN 12" THICKNESS SY 10.44 35,890 $ 374,691.60

3 DRAINAGE PIPE REMOVAL, SUBDRAIN LF 2.90 2,900 $ 8,410.00

4 D-705 PERFORATED SUBDRAIN, 6" DIA. LF 13.92 4,000 $ 55,680.00

5 D-705 SUBDRAIN CLEANOUT EA 551.00 20 $ 11,020.00

6 D-705 SUBDRAIN CONNECTION TO EXISTING STRUCTURE OR PIPE EA 580.00 6 $ 3,480.00

7 P-152 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION CY 8.70 6,500 $ 56,550.00

8 P-158 9 INCH SUBGRADE TREATMENT SY 8.70 45,190 $ 393,153.00

9 P-208 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, VAR. THICKNESS, 0 TO 11.5 INCHES SY 5.22 9,300 $ 48,546.00

10 P-219 RECYCLED CONCRETE AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 8" SY 6.96 45,190 $ 314,522.40

11 P-156STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PREPARATION AND MANAGEMENT LS 17,400.00 1 $ 17,400.00

12 P-156 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE EA 58.00 3 $ 174.00

13 P-307 DRAINABLE BASE COURSE, 6" SY 22.04 35,890 $ 791,015.60

14 P-501 10" PCC SHOULDER PAVEMENT SY 46.40 9,900 $ 459,360.00

15 P-501 16" PCC PAVEMENT SY 78.88 34,690 $ 2,736,347.20

16 P-604 COMPRESSION JOINT SEALS LF 3.19 150,000 $ 478,500.00

17 P-620 PAVEMENT MARKINGS - RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY PAINT, TYPE 1 BEADS SF 1.45 2,100 $ 3,045.00


19 P-620 PAVEMENT MARKINGS - BLACK OUTLINES, PAINT SF 1.16 6,900 $ 8,004.00

20 P-621 SAW CUT GROOVING SY 2.61 25,000 $ 65,250.00

21 L-108-1 No. 6 AWG, 5KV, L-824C CABLE, INSTALLED IN CONDUIT LF 2.61 4,500 $ 11,745.00

22 L-108-2NO. 6 AWG, BARE SOLID COUNTERPOISE WIRE WITH GROUND RODS AND EXOTHERMIC CONNECTIONS LF 2.32 4,500 $ 10,440.00

23 L-110-1 1 WAY 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC IN NEW SHOULDER PAVEMENT LF 9.28 300 $ 2,784.00

24 L-110-2 1 WAY 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DUCT, CONCRETE ENCASED LF 9.28 1,500 $ 13,920.00

25 L-125-3 L-862 RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT EA 1,566.00 16 $ 25,056.00

26 L-125-5 L-858 LED SIGN UNIT EA 4,640.00 3 $ 13,920.00

27 L-125-6 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION LS 58,000.00 1 $ 58,000.00

28 T-901 SEEDING AND FERTILIZING ACRE 1,392.00 13 $ 18,096.00

29 T-904 SODDING SY 46.40 1,300 $ 60,320.00

30 T-905 TOPSOILING CY 5.80 10,500 $ 60,900.00

31 T-908 MULCHING ACRE 1,392.00 13 $ 18,096.00

32 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS LS 63,000.00 1 $ 63,000.00

33 TRAFFIC CONTROL/SECURITY LS 290,000.00 1 $ 290,000.00

34 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY LS 58,000.00 1 $ 58,000.00

35 MOBILIZATION AND MISCELLANEOUS LS 464,000.00 1 $ 464,000.00

$7,076,609

$566,000

$7,642,609Rounded $7,640,000

October 25, 2016

FY19 COST ESTIMATE

DES MOINES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT1330 FT RUNWAY 5/23 CONSTRUCTION - WEST OF INTERSECTION

QUANTITY TOTALITEM NO.ITEM CODE


Construction Admin. And Observation, Legal, Administration (8%)



c:\pw_workdir\pw_ie\cmw1\dms89698\FY19_Cost Estimate-Runway.xlsx1/12/2017






4 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT EA 1,508.00 4 $ 6,032.00

5 D-705 PERFORATED SUBDRAIN, 6" DIA. LF 23.20 400 $ 9,280.00






11 T-901 SEEDING AND FERTILIZINGACR

E 1,392.00 4 $ 5,568.00

12 T-904 SODDING SY 8.12 500 $ 4,060.00

13 T-905 TOPSOILING CY 6.38 3,300 $ 21,054.00

14 T-908 MULCHINGACR

E 1,392.00 4 $ 5,568.00


$540,589

$43,000

$583,589Rounded $580,000

October 25, 2016

FY19 COST ESTIMATE

DES MOINES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTTAXIWAY R3 & P3 REMOVAL


ITEM NO.ITEM CODE




QUANTITY TOTAL






3 DRAINAGE PIPE REMOVAL, SUBDRAIN LF 2.90 500 $ 1,450.00




7 24" RCP LF 92.80 700 $ 64,960.00









16 P-501 16" PCC PAVEMENT SY 78.88 8,600 $ 678,368.00

17 P-604 COMPRESSION JOINT SEALANT LF 3.19 10,000 $ 31,900.00






23 L-110-1 1 WAY 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC IN NEW SHOULDER PAVEMENT LF 9.28 1,000 $ 9,280.00

24 L-125-3 L-861T TAXIWAY EDGE LIGHT EA 1,566.00 30 $ 46,980.00

25 L-125-5 L-858 LED SIGN UNIT EA 4,640.00 1 $ 4,640.00



28 T-904 SODDING SY 7.54 600 $ 4,524.00

29 T-905 TOPSOILING CY 5.80 1,500 $ 8,700.00

30 T-908 MULCHING ACRE 1,392.00 2 $ 2,784.00





$2,122,713

$170,000

$2,292,713Rounded $2,290,000


Construction Observation and Admin, Legal, Administration (8%)




FY19 COST ESTIMATE

DES MOINES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTTAXIWAY P4 RECONSTRUCTION

October 25, 2016




CIP DATA SHEET



PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Design of 2,150 ft Reconstruction of Rwy 23 End to Intersection & Twy Bravo Connector , & FAA Reimbursable Agreement


FY2019

JUSTIFICATION: Due to pavement deterioration as shown in the PCI Report, the reconstruction of the east 2,150 ft of Runway 5/23 will be completed. The design of this project will include the removal and replacement of existing pavement, construction of paved shoulders, lighting, signs, grading, markings, etc. Design will also include the relocation of Taxiway Bravo at the Terminal Apron connector. This will eliminate the direct access from the apron to Runway 5/23. Project will also include the FAA Reimbursable Agreement as well an AGIS Survey. COST ESTIMATE: (Attach detailed cost estimate)

Design: Federal (90%) $719,421 State $0 Local (10%) $79,936 Total $799,357 Reimbur. Agr: Federal (90%) $90,000 State $0 Local (10%) $10,000 Total $100,000 AGIS Survey: Federal (90%) $67,500 State $0 Local (10%) $7,500 Total $75,000









Runway 5/23 Reconstruction

CIP DATA SHEET



PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Reconstruct 1,750 ft Runway 5/23 and reconstruct safety area pavement at intersection of Runway 5/23 and 13/31, Relocate Taxiway Bravo connection to Terminal Apron


FY2020

SKETCH:

JUSTIFICATION: This project includes the reconstruction of a portion of Runway 5/23 (1,750 LF). Project also includes replacement of Taxiway B pavement between Papa and Runway 5/23 in order to remove the direct connection of the terminal apron to the runway. Work consists of removal and replacement of existing pavement, construction of paved shoulders, and installation of edge lighting, guidance signs, grading, drainage, pavement markings and miscellaneous related work items. This section of Runway 5/23 has exceeded its design life and is comprised of deteriorated pavement. The PCI Report completed in 2014 shows a PCI rating between 47 and 70 on the proposed limits of the Taxiway P reconstruction. These issues will be resolved under this project. Project includes the overlay / HMA transition pavement on Taxiway P and P1. It is anticipated that the Runway 23 end will be raised by 4 feet. Therefore, this HMA pavement will act as a transition between Runway 23 end, Taxiway Papa, and the current elevation of the terminal apron.

COST ESTIMATE: (Attach detailed cost estimate) Federal (90%) $17,036,100 State $0 Local (10%) $1,892,900 Total $18,929,000 SPONSOR’S VERIFICATION: Date







- Revenue producing facilities (for fuel farms, hangars, etc.) NA - Date statement submitted for completed airside development NA - Date statement submitted for runway approaches are clear of obstructions



PHONE NUMBER: (515) 256-5160

Taxiway R

Taxiway P


Intersection RSA Reconstruct

13/31

HMA Transition Pavement

Reconstruct portion of Taxiway Bravo




4 DRAINAGE PIPE REMOVAL LF 58.76 4,910 $ 288,511.60

5 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE REMOVAL EA 1,695.00 7 $ 11,865.00

6 D-701 36" RCP LF 152.55 1,200 $ 183,060.00




10 D-751 STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EA 5,932.50 3 $ 17,797.50









19 P-501 16" PCC PAVEMENT SY 76.84 16,300 $ 1,252,492.00

20 COMPRESSION JOINT SEALANT LF 3.11 20,000 $ 62,150.00







27 L-110-2 1 WAY 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DUCT, CONCRETE ENCASED 81 9.04 650 $ 5,876.00

28 L-125 L-861T TAXIWAY EDGE LIGHT EA 1,525.50 20 $ 30,510.00

29 L-125 L-852K TAXIWAY CENTERLINE LIGHT EA 2,825.00 15 $ 42,375.00

30 L-125 L-804G IN-PAVEMENT RUNWAY GUARD LIGHTS EA 2,825.00 8 $ 22,600.00

31 L-125 L-858 LED SIGN UNIT EA 4,520.00 3 $ 13,560.00

32 L-125 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION LS 36,500.00 1 $ 36,500.00

34 DEICING TANK CONTROL BUILDING RELOCATION LS 56,500.00 1 $ 56,500.00


34 T-904 SODDING SY 7.35 1,000 $ 7,345.00

35 T-905 TOPSOILING CY 5.65 1,300 $ 7,345.00

36 T-908 MULCHING ACRE 1,695.00 2 $ 3,390.00





$4,371,673

$350,000

$4,721,673Rounded $4,720,000

October 24, 2016

FY19 COST ESTIMATE

DES MOINES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTPORTIONS OF TAXIWAY BRAVO RECONSTRUCTION

Subtotal Taxiway Construction Costs

ITEM NO.ITEM CODE




QUANTITY TOTAL

c:\pw_workdir\pw_ie\cmw1\dms89697\FY19_Cost Estimates.xlsx11/21/2016



20

1 P-101 SAWCUTTING LF $ 13.92 55,000 $ 765,600.00



4 TEMPORARY CRANE MAT SY $ 29.00 7,500 $ 217,500.00

5 SUBGRADE SEPARATION LAYER SY $ 3.48 7,500 $ 26,100.00

6 P-209 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 10" SY $ 29.00 7,500 $ 217,500.00

7 P-501 17" PCC PAVEMENT, ACCELERATED STRENGTH SY $ 232.00 7,500 $ 1,740,000.00

8 P-620 RUNWAY PAVEMENT MARKINGS LS $ 11,600.00 1 $ 11,600.00


10 No. 6 AWG, 5KV CABLE LF $ 3.48 6,000 $ 20,880.00

11 L-110-2 1 WAY 2" RGS DUCT LF $ 13.92 2,500 $ 34,800.00


13 L-125-2 L-850C BIDIRECTIONAL IN-PAVEMENT RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT EA $ 2,900.00 2 $ 5,800.00

14 L-125-3 L-862 RUNWAY/TAXIWAY EDGE LIGHT EA $ 1,566.00 14 $ 21,924.00





$4,044,804

$404,480

$4,449,284Rounded $4,449,000

RECONSTRUCT RUNWAY INTERSECTION SAFETY AREA (not bullseye) with PCC


October 28, 2016

ITEM NO.ITEM CODE



QUANTITY TOTAL


Construction Admin, Legal, Administration (10%)

c:\pw_workdir\pw_ie\amw\dms89697\FY19_Cost Estimates.xlsx11/2/2016






4 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT EA 847.50 8 $ 6,780.00










14 P-156 WATTLES LF 1.70 4,000 $ 6,780.00


16 P-401 HMA TRANSITION PAVEMENT TON 150.00 4,500 $ 675,000.00


17 P-501 16" PCC PAVEMENT SY 76.84 39,000 $ 2,996,760.00

18 P-605 COMPRESSION JOINT SEALANT LF 3.11 50,000 $ 155,375.00




22 P-621 SAW CUT GROOVING SY 2.54 30,000 $ 76,275.00




26 L-110-2 1 WAY 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DUCT, CONCRETE ENCASED LF 9.04 600 $ 5,424.00

27 L-125-2 L-850C BIDIRECTIONAL IN-PAVEMENT RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT EA 2,034.00 2 $ 4,068.00

28 L-125-3 L-862 RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT EA 1,525.50 16 $ 24,408.00

29 L-125-5 L-858 LED SIGN UNIT - 1 MODULE EA 3,390.00 3 $ 10,170.00



33 T-904 SODDING SY 45.20 2,000 $ 90,400.00

34 T-905 TOPSOILING CY 5.65 3,400 $ 19,210.00

35 T-908 MULCHING ACRE 1,356.00 5 $ 6,780.00





$9,040,294

$723,000

$9,763,294Rounded $9,760,000






October 24, 2016

FY20 COST ESTIMATE

DES MOINES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

2150 FT RUNWAY 5/23 CONSTRUCTION - EAST OF INTERSECTION




CIP DATA SHEET



PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Reconstruct 1,000 ft Taxiway Papa Identify FFY that you desire to construct (FFY: Oct. 1-Sept. 30)

FY2020

SKETCH:

JUSTIFICATION: This project includes the reconstruction of a portion of Taxiway Papa (1,000 LF) where the PCI is 53 as of 2014 and the pavement is actively deteriorating. Work consists of removal and replacement of existing pavement, construction of paved shoulders, installation of edge lighting, guidance signs, grading, drainage, pavement markings and miscellaneous related work items

COST ESTIMATE: (Attach detailed cost estimate) Federal (90%) $2,079,000 State $0 Local (10%) $231,000 Total $2,310,000 SPONSOR’S VERIFICATION: Date


2017 (pending) - Date of approved ALP with project shown








PHONE NUMBER: (515) 256-5160

Taxiway B

Runway 5/23

Reconstruct Approximately 1,000 LF of Taxiway Papa

Terminal Apron




4 DRAINAGE PIPE REMOVAL LF 58.76 350 $ 20,566.00

5 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE REMOVAL EA 1,695.00 3 $ 5,085.00

6 D-701 36" RCP LF 152.55 600 $ 91,530.00




10 D-751 STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EA 5,932.50 2 $ 11,865.00









19 P-501 16" PCC PAVEMENT SY 76.84 8,000 $ 614,720.00

20 COMPRESSION JOINT SEALANT LF 3.11 10,000 $ 31,075.00


22 P-620 PAVEMENT MARKINGS - RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY PAINT, TYPE 3 BEADS SF 2.09 700 $ 1,463.35





27 L-110-2 1 WAY 2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DUCT, CONCRETE ENCASED 81 9.04 350 $ 3,164.00

28 L-125 L-861T TAXIWAY EDGE LIGHT EA 1,525.50 10 $ 15,255.00

30 L-125 L-858 LED SIGN UNIT EA 4,520.00 1 $ 4,520.00

31 L-125 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION LS 20,000.00 1 $ 20,000.00


33 T-904 SODDING SY 7.35 500 $ 3,672.50

34 T-905 TOPSOILING CY 5.65 700 $ 3,955.00

35 T-908 MULCHING ACRE 1,695.00 1 $ 1,695.00





$2,009,741

$301,000

$2,310,741Rounded $2,310,000

Design, Construction Admin. And Observation, Legal, Administration (15%)


QUANTITY TOTAL

Subtotal Taxiway Construction Costs

ITEM NO.ITEM CODE


FY19 COST ESTIMATE

DES MOINES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT1,000 FT OF TAXIWAY PAPA RECONSTRUCTION

October 24, 2016




20

CIP DATA SHEET



PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Design of Terminal Apron Reconstruction – Phase 1 Identify FFY that you desire to construct (FFY: Oct. 1-Sept. 30)

FY2020

SKETCH:

JUSTIFICATION: This project includes the demolition of the existing East General Aviation Apron along with associated parking lots and access roads. The proposed apron will be constructed in its place to allow for the construction of the new terminal building in year 2022. This project involves extensive removals of existing utilities and pavement, storm sewer installation, subdrain installation, excavation, subgrade prep, subbase installation, drainable base course, lighting, signage, marking, PCC paving, and others.

COST ESTIMATE: (Attach detailed cost estimate) Federal (90%) $720,000 State $0 Local (10%) $80,000 Total $800,000











PHONE NUMBER: (515) 256-5160

Terminal Apron

Taxiway Papa

Existing Terminal Building

Ultimate Terminal Building

Remove Existing GA Apron / Construct New Terminal

Apron

CIP DATA SHEET



PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Demolition of Existing Terminal Apron – Phase 1 Identify FFY that you desire to construct (FFY: Oct. 1-Sept. 30)

FY2020

SKETCH:

JUSTIFICATION: This project includes the demolition of the existing East General Aviation Apron along with associated parking lots and access roads. Project also includes the demolition of existing Buildings 7, 8, 9, and 10. This project is in preparation of the construction of the proposed apron which will allow for the construction of the new terminal building in year 2022. This project involves extensive removals of existing utilities and pavement along with building demolition.

COST ESTIMATE: (Attach detailed cost estimate) Federal (90%) $2,610,000 State $0 Local (10%) $290,000 Total $2,900,000











PHONE NUMBER: (515) 256-5160

Terminal Apron

Taxiway Papa

Existing Terminal Building

Remove Existing GA Apron and Bldgs 7, 8, 9, 10




4 DRAINAGE PIPE REMOVAL LF 58.76 11,000 $ 646,360.00

5 D-705 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE REMOVAL EA 1,695.00 50 $ 84,750.00

6 BUILDING 7 DEMOLITION LS 200,000.00 1 $ 200,000.00




30 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION LS 56,500.00 1 $ 56,500.00





$2,518,289

$378,000

$2,896,289Rounded $2,900,000

Engineering, Construction Admin. And Observation, Legal, Administration (15%)


QUANTITY TOTAL


ITEM NO.ITEM CODE


FY20 COST ESTIMATE

DES MOINES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTTERMINAL APRON DEMOLITION - PHASE 1

February 1, 2017




CIP DATA SHEET



PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Pave Service Road Identify FFY that you desire to construct (FFY: Oct. 1-Sept. 30)

FY2020

SKETCH:

JUSTIFICATION: This project includes the construction of a paved service road around the southeast end of Runway 13/31. The proposed paved service road will be to allow for transportation of fuel from the future East General Aviation Apron to the Passenger Terminal Apron. Currently fueling services for the Terminal Apron are provided from Signature, a tenant of the East General Aviation Apron. The East General Aviation Apron will be relocated for the construction of the new terminal building in year 2022. This project involves subdrain installation, excavation, subgrade prep, subbase installation, PCC paving, and others.









SPONSOR’S SIGNATURE: DATE: _________________ PRINTED NAME: Bryan Belt TITLE: Director of Engineering and Planning PHONE NUMBER: (515) 256-5160


Airport Documentation Update $239,722.00

Project Airport Documentation Update


Airfield Pavement Maintenance Update 120,000 ‐ 108,000 12,000 12,000

Program Update

Airport Layout Plan Update 227,722 ‐ 227,722 227,722

347,722 ‐ 108,000 239,722 239,722

AIP Grant

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: DSM PFC Application #16 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Airport Documentation Update 2. Project Number 3. Use Airport of Project: Des Moines International (DSM) 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [ X ] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [ ] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ X ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $ 239,722 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $ 239,722 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: 2018 Entitlement Discretionary $ 108,000 Total $ 108,000 Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $108,000 Other Funds: State Grants $

Revised 8/31/2010

Local Funds Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: Total Project Cost: $347,722 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: These projects will complete required documentation for the Airport Authority to maintain, so they will be funded by operations if PFCs are not approved. If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description:

The Airport Documentation Update project includes updating the Pavement Condition Report and the Airport Layout Plan. The Pavement Condition Report will be updated with the work completed since the last update and determine current PCI values for the airfield. The Airport Layout Plan will be updated with the findings from the programming study that is currently being completed. In addition, the update will include analysis of trees on properties surrounding the airport to ensure none are violating the airspace. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities:

Revised 8/31/2010

Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ X ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________

Revised 8/31/2010

__ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: The objective of this project is to update the required documentation with the changes identified during the Terminal Programming project as well as repair and maintenance that has occurred in the last few years. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: The Pavement Condition Report and the Airport Layout Plan are required documents for the Authority to keep current. The plans are necessary for the safe operation of the airfield and airspace. Per Grant Assurance 11, airport sponsors are required to update the airfield pavement maintenance program every 3-5 years. Last update occurred in 2014.

FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s)

Revised 8/31/2010

Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): January 2017 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): October 2018 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)?

Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ X ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ X ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ X ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: Recap of Disagreements

Revised 8/31/2010

Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________

Revised 8/31/2010

Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

CIP DATA SHEET



PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Airfield Pavement Maintenance Program Update Identify FFY that you desire to construct (FFY: Oct. 1-Sept. 30)

FY2018

SKETCH:

JUSTIFICATION: Per Grant Assurance 11, airport sponsors are required to update the airfield pavement maintenance program every 3-5 years. Last update occurred in 2014.









SPONSOR’S SIGNATURE: DATE: _________________ PRINTED NAME: Bryan Belt TITLE: Director of Engineering and Planning PHONE NUMBER: (515) 256-5160


Terminal Programming Phase II $2,391,769.00

Project Terminal Programming Phase II


Terminal Programming Phase II 2,391,769 ‐ ‐ 2,391,769 2,391,769

2,391,769 ‐ ‐ 2,391,769 2,391,769

AIP Grant

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: DSM PFC Application #16 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Terminal Master Plan / Programming Study – Phase II 2. Project Number 3. Use Airport of Project: Des Moines International (DSM) 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [ X ] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [ ] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ X ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $ 2,391,769 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $ 2,391,769 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement Discretionary $ 0 Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $ 0

Revised 8/31/2010

Other Funds: State Grants $ Local Funds Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: Total Project Cost: $2,391,769 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: Phase II of the The Terminal Master Plan / Programming Study is currently being completed by HNTB and Foth Infrastructure under contracts signed in 2016. The Authority will fund from operations if PFCs are not approved. If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description:

The Terminal Master Plan / Programming Study will be completed in order to develop detailed plans for the replacement of DSM’s existing terminal building and resulting space allocations on the airport. The initial phase of this project was completed in 2016 to reconsider the space due to the fact that the Air National Guard leasehold did not revert to Authority control as originally planned. As required by Federal Aviation Administration – Central Region, the Programming study will further define the areas within the Terminal, take the construction estimate to a more precise level, and start the design process. With the requirement to accurately define terminal requirements, schematic design (SD) will start to occur. Schematic design is usually defined by up to 30% of normal design documents. The Programming study documentation will be utilized as the starting point once DSM initiates the design process. The Master Plan data will be used for the Airport Layout Plan update to be completed in 2017 and 2018. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters:

Revised 8/31/2010

Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ X ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________

Revised 8/31/2010

__ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: The Terminal Master Plan / Programming Study Phase II will provide a detailed plan to move forward with a new terminal building. The existing DSM terminal is projected to have significant capacity restrictions by the year 2020 based on the FAA’s current enplanement growth projections. In order to accommodate a new terminal, significant space allocations are needed throughout the east and south quadrants of the airfield. This work will develop the plan to isolate commercial traffic. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues.

Revised 8/31/2010

11. Project Justification: Portions of the current terminal were built prior to 1950 and significant capacity restrictions are expected to result in the coming years. It is necessary to complete this study at this time so that detailed plans can progress, and follow on steps can be conducted timely. The programing study will allow DSM to determine the appropriate terminal sizing to provide for expected capacity increases needed over the next twenty years, as well a move existing infrastructure to accommodate the new terminal building.

FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______

Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): January 2017 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): October 2017 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ X ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ X ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or

Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ X ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination.

Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Des Moines Airport Authority, 5800 Fleur Drive, Room # 201, Des Moines, IA 50321; T 515-256-5100; F 515-256-5025; www.dsmairport.com

July 5, 2017 «FULL_NAME» «TITLE» «COMPANY» «ADDRESS_1» «ADDRESS_2» «CSZ» RE: Notification of Intent to Apply for Concurrent Authority to Impose and Use Passenger Facility Charges (PFC) at the Des Moines International Airport Dear «GREETING»: In accordance with FAR Part 158, Passenger Facility Charges (PFC), Section 158.23, written notification is required to notify all air carriers and foreign air carriers serving this Airport of the intent to apply to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for Concurrent Authority to Impose and Use Passenger Facility Charges at the Des Moines International Airport. The date, time, and location of the consultation during which the public agency will present the project described below to air carriers operating at the Airport is August 8, 2017 at 11:00 AM CDT in Conference Room 211, 2nd floor of the Airport Terminal Building. Airline representatives will have the option of attending in person or participating via conference call. Information required under Section 158.23 (b) and not enclosed herein will be provided during (or before) the consultation. If interested in participating in the conference call, please contact Brian Mulcahy at (515) 256-5389 or [email protected] by August 4th for further instructions. The following additional information is provided to comply with the FAR Part 158 requirements: Application to Impose and Use Amount

1. Reconstruction of 13/31 Phase VI $1,303,510

Phase VI of this project is the final phase of the Runway 13/31 Reconstruction. This project will cover 1,850 feet of runway at a total estimated cost of $13,035,100. The Des Moines Airport Authority requests PFCs to cover the AIP match.

http://www.dsmairport.com/

mailto:[email protected]

Notification of Intent to Apply for Concurrent Authority to Impose and Use Passenger Facility Charges (PFC) at the Des Moines International Airport July 21, 2014

2. Reconstruction of 05/23 and Terminal Apron $3,789,226 The analysis, design and reconstruction of runway 05/23 will be completed during 2018 – 2020. In addition to repair of failing concrete, this project brings the runway into current design standards by raising the elevation of the runway approximately 2 feet. The project will also address Runway Incursion Mitigation Strategy (RIMS) issues by moving the Taxiway Bravo connection to the terminal apron. This project also includes reconstruction a portion of Terminal Apron that that is being raised to match the approach end of runway 23. 3. Airport Documentation Update $239,722 This project includes the Airport Pavement Update and an update of the Airport Layout Plan (ALP). Based on the terminal programming project currently being completed, a revised ALP will be required. 4. Terminal Programming – Phase II $2,391,769 The Des Moines Airport Authority does not currently possess aircraft stairs that may be used in the event that a boarding bridge is unavailable. Within the last year we have experienced loading bridges out of service with no ability to use the parking position via ground boarding. Also, when the expected construction of a new terminal occurs in the future, DSM is likely to have reduced loading bridge capacity at some point throughout construction.

The Airport’s PFC collection level is currently $4.50 per passenger. The charge effective date for the proposed application is estimated to be October 1, 2024, and the estimated charge expiration date is October 1, 2026. The estimated total additional PFC revenue under the new Application is $7,724,227. An exemption has been established under previous RODs and all related amendments for Part 135 Air Taxi/Commercial Operators (ATCO) filing form 1800-31. Again the Des Moines Airport Authority requests that carriers filing form 1800-31 be excluded from the requirement to collect PFCs; the reason for the request being the administrative burden of collecting fees from this class of air carriers would exceed the revenue collected from them during the collection period and because the carriers represent less than 1% of total enplanements at DSM. The most recent update of that list reflects the exempted carriers filing form 1800-31 and their annual enplanements for 2015, as follows:

Air Carrier Enplanements Aero Jet Services (J7EA) 12 Priester Aviation LLC (PRIA) 7 Reliant Air Charter, Inc (QREA) 2 Tulip City Air Service, Inc (EBTA) 6

Notification of Intent to Apply for Concurrent Authority to Impose and Use Passenger Facility Charges (PFC) at the Des Moines International Airport July 21, 2014 Ultimate Jetcharters LLC (DTHA) 198 Total 225 In the event there are any changes to the individual designated by your organization to receive official notice and correspondence regarding PFCs, please notify the current individual of the date and time for the conference call and provide me, in writing, with the name, address, and e-mail as soon as possible. Sincerely, Brian C. Mulcahy Director of Finance cc: Sheila Bridges, FAA – Central Region Herbert Hoover – Accounting Manager (DSM)

application to impose and use passenger facility … is des moines airport authority’s application...

Documents