applying microcalorimetry to characterize the stability ... microcalorimetry to characterize...
TRANSCRIPT
Applying Microcalorimetry to Characterize the Stability Applying Microcalorimetry to Characterize the Stability and Compatibility of Pharmaceutical Systemsand Compatibility of Pharmaceutical Systems
Time/s0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000
HeatFlow/mW
-0.35
-0.30
-0.25
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
-0.35
-0.30
-0.25
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Figure:25/11/2002 Mass (mg):674.8
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation:Procedure: 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 3 hours each (Zone 2)Micro DSC III
Exo Exo
Exo
35C 37.5C 40C 42.5C 45C
ThermalCal International
OutlineOutlineMicrocalorimetry: The Universal Detector
Overview of Microcalorimetry Stability and Compatibility Testing
Overview of Commercially Available Microcalorimeters
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: The Universal DetectorMicrocalorimetry: The Universal DetectorIsothermal Microcalorimetry
Heat Flow Measured as Difference Between Sample and Reference
Isothermal Temperature Usually Maintained by Large Volume Constant Temperature Bath
Typical Detection Limit ~ +/-0.5 uJ/sec
Sample Sizes Range from 1ml to 150ml
Temperature Range ~ 5 to 90 °C
dQ/dt = ∆H *dn/dt
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: The Universal DetectorMicrocalorimetry: The Universal DetectorIsothermal Microcalorimetry
Chemical ProcessesHydrolysis, oxidation, free radical, etc. all have large
heats of reaction.
Ideally, degradation rates of less than 1% per year can be predicted in a matter of days.
Physical and Bio ProcessesCrystallization, polymorph conversions, bacterial
growth.
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: The Universal DetectorMicrocalorimetry: The Universal DetectorIsothermal Microcalorimetry
Closed or Open Systems
Batch BatchMixing Pressure
FluidMixingFluid
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: The Universal DetectorMicrocalorimetry: The Universal DetectorIsothermal Microcalorimetry
Qox = ∆ Hox*nox
Qhyd = ∆ Hhyd*nhyd
etc.
etc.
Qmeasured = Σi∆ Hi*ni
Standard Addition
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: The Universal DetectorMicrocalorimetry: The Universal DetectorScanning Microcalorimetry (HSDSC)
Heat Flow Measured as Difference Between Sample and Reference
Temperature Ramped by Peltier Elements or Fluid Circulation. Heat/Cool. Isothermal.
Typical Detection Limit ~.2-5 uJ/sec
Sample Sizes Range from .3 ml to 1 ml
Slow Scan Rates .001 – 1 °C /min
Temperature Range ~ -45 to 120 °C
d(dQ/dt)/dT = ∆H *d(dn/dt)/dT
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: The Universal DetectorMicrocalorimetry: The Universal DetectorScanning Microcalorimetry (HSDSC)
Chemical ProcessesThermally induced chemical reactions.
Physical and Bio ProcessesGlass transitions, thermally induced crystallization and polymorph conversions, protein denaturation.
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: The Universal DetectorMicrocalorimetry: The Universal DetectorScanning Microcalorimetry (HSDSC)
Closed or Open Systems
BatchMixing
Batch
Wetting
Fluid FluidMixing∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: The Universal DetectorMicrocalorimetry: The Universal DetectorDetection LimitsDetection Limits
•If a significant signal of 1 µW is detectable, and if it is assumed that the reaction enthalpy ∆HR, is 50 kJ/mole for the compound, it is possible to estimate the rate of reaction x :•x = (10-6 J/s / 50x103 J/mole) = 2x10-11 mole/sec,
or 1.2x10-9 mole/min, or 1.7x10-6 mole/day, or 6.3x10-4 mole/year
•It is also possible to use the Arrhenius law for different temperatures : dα/dt = k (1- α)n = k0 exp(-E/RT) (1- α)n
•dα/dt is proportional to the calorimetric signal (dH/dt)•Plotting Log(dH/dt) versus 1/T yields the kinetic parameters of the reaction.
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Stability TestingMicrocalorimetry: Stability TestingReaction in Solution: pH EffectReaction in Solution: pH Effect
Furnace temperature /°C30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
-0.30
-0.25
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
pH 10
Figure:Mass (mg):15.43
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation:Procedure: scan 10C to 95C (Zone 7)
Exo
Exo Exo
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Stability TestingMicrocalorimetry: Stability TestingReaction in Solution: pH EffectReaction in Solution: pH Effect
2.75 2.80 2.85 2.90 2.95 3.00 3.05 3.106.2
6.4
6.6
6.8
7.0
7.2
7.4
7.6
7.8
Linear Regression for ph8_B:Y = A + B * X
Parameter Value Error------------------------------------------------------------A 19.9813 0.44947B -4.41783 0.1539------------------------------------------------------------
R SD N P-------------------------------------------------------------0.98056 0.08826 35 <0.0001------------------------------------------------------------
ln(u
W/g
)
1/T(K)*10002.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
Linear Regression for ph10scan_B:Y = A + B * X
Parameter Value Error------------------------------------------------------------A 26.25509 0.06499B -6.03829 0.0226------------------------------------------------------------
R SD N P-------------------------------------------------------------0.99982 0.00817 28 <0.0001------------------------------------------------------------
Linear Regression for ph10scan_B:Y = A + B * X
Parameter Value Error------------------------------------------------------------A 40.67733 1.19214B -10.71188 0.37892------------------------------------------------------------
R SD N P-------------------------------------------------------------0.99565 0.02975 9 <0.0001------------------------------------------------------------
ln(u
W/g
)
1/T(K)*1000
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Stability TestingMicrocalorimetry: Stability TestingReaction in Solution: Solvent EffectReaction in Solution: Solvent Effect
Hydrolysis of Ester with NaOH at 25C
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200time (sec)
Q/Q
tot
0% DMF4.8% DMF17% DMF
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Stability TestingMicrocalorimetry: Stability TestingAPI Stability in PEG: Effect of BHTAPI Stability in PEG: Effect of BHT
Time/s0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000
0.0 0.0
35C 37.5C 40C 42.5C 45C
Red: API/PEG (no BHT) - Placebo
Blue: API/PEG (with BHT) - Placebo
Figure:29/10/2002 Mass (mg):715.8
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation:Procedure: 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 3 hours each (Zone 2)
ExoExo
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Stability TestingMicrocalorimetry: Stability TestingSolution Stability: Impact of PreservativeSolution Stability: Impact of Preservative
Effect of Preservative on Bacteria Growth
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Time (hours)
Ther
mal A
ctivit
y (uJ
oules
/sec)
Biological Solution
Biological Solution + Propyl Gallate
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Stability TestingMicrocalorimetry: Stability TestingSolid State Stability: RealSolid State Stability: Real--time Monitoring of Polymorph Conversiontime Monitoring of Polymorph Conversion
Time/h2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5
-0.4
-0.2
-0.0
0.2
0.4
HeatFlow/mW
-0.4
-0.2
-0.0
0.2
0.4Blue:Sample= .5g aluminaReference= steel cell
Black:Sample= 472.9 mg form 1Reference= steel cell
Red:Sample= 460.0 mg form I Reference= steel cell
Thermal Activity
60C 70C 80C
89C
Figure: 22/10/2002 Mass (mg):472.9
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation:Procedure:
ExoExo
Blank
Thermal disturbances caused by temperature
ramping
Time/h2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5
HeatFlow/mW
-0.4
-0.2
-0.0
0.2
0.4
-0.4
-0.2
-0.0
0.2
0.4
Blue:Sample= .5g aluminaReference= steel cell
Red:Sample= 352.7mg form II Reference= steel cell
Black:Sample= 410.6 mg Reference= steel cell
80C 60C 70C 89C
Thermal Activity
Figure: 23/10/2002
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation: Procedure:
Exo Exo
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Stability TestingMicrocalorimetry: Stability TestingSolid State Stability: RealSolid State Stability: Real--time Monitoring of Polymorph Conversiontime Monitoring of Polymorph Conversion
Time/h2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5
-0.4
-0.2
-0.0
0.2
0.4
HeatFlow/mW
-0.4
-0.2
-0.0
0.2
0.4Blue:Sample= .5g aluminaReference= steel cell
Black:Sample= 472.9 mg form 1Reference= steel cell
Red:Sample= 460.0 mg form I Reference= steel cell
Thermal Activity
60C 70C 80C
89C
Figure: 22/10/2002 Mass (mg):472.9
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation: Procedure:
ExoExo
Blank
Time/h2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5
Heat Flow - 2 - red3 970011 isotherms at 50,60,70,80,89/mW
-0.4
-0.2
-0.0
0.2
0.4
-0.4
-0.2
-0.0
0.2
0.4Blue:Sample= .5g aluminaReference= steel cellBlack:Sample= 338.5 mg mixedReference= steel cellRed:Sample= 520.2 mg mixed Reference= steel cell
Thermal Activity
Figure: 24/10/2002 Mass (mg):409.4
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation:Procedure:
Exo
338.5mg
520.2mg
Blank
60C 70C80C
89C
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Stability TestingMicrocalorimetry: Stability TestingProtein Stability: Impact of StabilizerProtein Stability: Impact of Stabilizer
Furnace temperature /°C30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
HeatFlow/mW
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8 Peak 1 :66.6557 °CPeak 2 :70.9494 °COnset Point :61.7528 °C Enthalpy /J : 0.0378 (Endothermic effect) (0.0562 + -0.0185)
Peak 1 :67.2049 °C Peak 2 :73.3009 °C Onset Point :62.2572 °C Enthalpy /J : 0.0331 (Endothermic effect) (0.0549 + -0.0217)
1 % BSA
1% BSA + 4% Manitol
Figure:17/06/2002 Mass (mg):0
Crucible: batch Atmosphere:AirExperimentation:1% BSA Procedure: BSA scan 22 to 90 (Zone 2)
Exo
Exo
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Stability TestingMicrocalorimetry: Stability TestingSolid State Stability: Influence of HumiditySolid State Stability: Influence of Humidity
Time/h0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
HeatFlow/mW
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Red: Lot AGreen: Lot BBlue: Lot C1.4 hr
4.7 hr
2.4 hr
Figure:14/01/2003 Mass (mg):599.6
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation:Procedure:
Exo
Exo
Exo
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Compatibility TestingMicrocalorimetry: Compatibility TestingGeneral ConceptGeneral Concept
+Time ---> TA of API q1
+Time ---> TA of Excipient q2
+Time ---> TA of Mix qmix
qmix = x1q1 + x2q2 ?
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Compatibility TestingMicrocalorimetry: Compatibility TestingHSDSCHSDSC
Furnace temperature /°C20 40 60 80 100
HeatFlow/mW
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
114 C
Red: Placebo
Blue: API
Black: Formulation
Figure:01/03/2003 Mass (mg):500.2
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation:Procedure: scan 15C to 119C (Zone 4)
Exo Exo
Exo Exo
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Compatibility TestingMicrocalorimetry: Compatibility TestingHSDSCHSDSC
Furnace temperature /°C30 40 50 60 70 80 90
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
-0.0
0.2
0.4
Formulation
Amorphous
Figure:15/01/2003 Mass (mg):26.2
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation:Procedure: scan 15-119 (Zone 7)
ExoExo
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S
Microcalorimetry: Compatibility TestingMicrocalorimetry: Compatibility TestingIsothermal Thermal ActivityIsothermal Thermal Activity
Time/h0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
HeatFlow/mW
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
-0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
-0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Red: placeboBlue: Salt Form ABlack: Salt Form B
Figure:12/11/2002 Mass (mg):599.4
Crucible: Standard HastelloyAtmosphere:AirExperimentation:Procedure: 50 60 70 3 hours each (Zone 2)
Exo Exo
Exo Exo
∆G = ∆ H - T ∆ S