approaching the internal structure of the nuclei of...
TRANSCRIPT
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 1
Approaching the internal structure
of the nuclei of comets
Anny-Chantal Levasseur-Regourd
J. Lasue, E. Hadamcik
Univ. Paris VI / Aéronomie [email protected]
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 2
Approaching the internal structure
of the nuclei of comets
Outline
1. Motivation
2. Past understanding
3. Present results
4. Future projects
Comet McNaught, January 2007
Tiny hidden nucleus
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 3
1. Motivation
Knowing the internal structure of cometsnuclei mandatory to
- understand their formation and evolution
- prepare future missions
In the absence of direct evidence, internalstructure approached through
- estimations of the density
- determination of the properties of dustparticles ejected from the nuclei
- observations of fragmentation andcatastrophic disruption events
Note
Icy comet nuclei small and very fragile
Rosetta artist view (ESA)
LINEAR 1999 S4 disruption (HST)
Mini comae around fragments
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 4
Densities
1P/Halley (1985-1986)
VeGa (IKI) and Giotto (ESA)
! Low density dark nucleus
- no detectable perturbations
- in agreement with NGF models
(0.2 to 0.8 g cm-3, Rickman et al. 1987)
! Dust particles, from OPE+DID data
- evolving with nucleus distance (time)
- density ! 0.1 g cm-3 and albedo ! 4%
IonsHalley/Giotto (MPI/ESA)
2. Past understanding
Inner comaInner coma
Levasseur-Regourd
et al. 1999
Keller et al. 1986
Log Nucleus distance (km)
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 5
Fragmentation
26P/Grigg-Skjellerup (1992) from Giotto
! Possible detection of a fragment by OPE
! Fragility of cometary nuclei suspected
Remote observations
- Shoemaker-Levy 9 discovery and evolution
(tidal disruption)
- Motion of icy fragments in C/1996 B2 Hyakutake
! Sizes ! 10-100 m, densities 0.1-0.8 g cm-3 (Desvoivres et al. 2000)
- Also C/LINEAR 1999 S4 and 73P/S-W 3 disruptions
IonsS-L 9, HST
LINEAR, HST
Hyakutake, HST
McBride et al. 1997
Yakutake, HST
73P/S-W 3, Spitzer
26P/G-S
Main coma
Secondary
coma
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 6
Ions
Remote light scattering observations and simulations
Observations of polarization of solar light scattered by dust,
with laboratory simulations (reduced gravity)
and numerical simulations (e.g. DDA)
! Irregular particles, with size > !
! Presence of fluffy -possibly fractal- aggregates
(clue to the nucleus structure?)
! At least bimodal population, silicates and more absorbing organics
3. Recent results
Pred(")100
80
60
40
20
0
Pola
rizati
on (
%)
150100500
Phase angle (°)
mixtures 50/50 in mass SiO2(40±20)nm+C
SiO2+C (14±5)nm
SiO2+C
(95±20)nm
SiO2
Data points and
corresponding fits
- red (near 670 nm)
- green (near 523 nm)
Levasseur-Regourd et al. 2007
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 7
Ions
81P/Wild 2 (2004-2006) and Stardust
! Rather rounded nucleus
! Complex morphology with ‘flat’ craters
! Swarm detected at ! 4000 km (Tuzzolino et al. 2004),
possibly related to dust fragmentation
! Estimated density 0.1-0.8 g m-3 (Davidsson & Guttierez, 06)
Return capsule with impacts on Al foils and tracks in aerogel cells
!Direct evidence for low density dust aggregates
Hölz et al. 2006
Brownlee et al. 2004
3. Recent results
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 8
Ions
9P/Tempel 1 (2005) and Deep Impact, Pre-Impact
Worldwide observations ! Aperiodic outbursts (nucleus ‘crumbling’)
High resolution images prior to impact
! Flat layers, scarps, erosion features
! Icy patches, leading to tiny jets at the limb
! Impact craters
Zone d’impact
Farnham et al. 2007
A’Hearn et al. 2005
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 9
Ions
9P/Tempel 1 (2005) and Deep Impact, Post-impact
Realistic impact experiment (m = 370 kg v = 10.2 km s-1)
- crater hidden by dust
- speed of fastest dust particles > 300 m s-1
! Density ! 0.35 ± 0.25 g m-3
(Estimated density ! 0.45 g m-3 (Davidsson et al. 2006)
! Super porous, porosity > ! 80 %
! Organics and water ice in subsurface
Zone d’impact
Sunshine et al. 2007
A’Hearn et al. 2005
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 10
Rosetta mission
Objectives
Rendezvous (Rosetta orbiter)
Landing on nucleus (Philae lander)
! Characterization of its evolution
from aphelion to perihelion
! Detailed study of the nucleus: composition, mineralogy, structure
Target 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
- a = 3.507 UA, e = 0.632, i = 7.12°
- nucleus ! 3 km x 5 km
- active areas ! 7% at perihelion
- density estimated ! 0.1 to 0.37 g cm-3
Successful launch, 2 March 2004
Philae
4. Future projects
Estimated shape of 67P nucleus, assuming a
prograde (up) or retrograde (bottom) rotation
Lamy et al. 2007
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 11
9P/Tempel 1
Mars
Rosetta milestones
2005, Earth swing-by, Tempel 1 impact observations (from .6 AU)
2007, Mars swing-by in February and 2nd Earth swing-by in November
2008, 2867 Steins (! 10 km, E-type) flyby on 5 September 2008
2009, 3rd Earth swing-by in November
2010, 21 Lutetia (! 100 km, M-type) flyby on 10 July 2010
2014, Rendezvous, with Philae landing ! 6 months later
Mars
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 12
CONSERT experiment
CONSERT, Cometary Nucleus Sounding by Radiowave Transmission
with parts on both the orbiter and the lander(Kofman et al. 2007)
Objectives: nucleus tomographic sounding from the determination of
its dielectric properties (materials, voids, discontinuities, porosity)
Instrumentation: radio-waves (90 MHz, 8 MHz band-pass) from the
orbiter, with reception and re-emission by Philae
! Information on celerity V and electric field E
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 13
Mars
Preparation of Rosetta encounter
Dust coma
Optimisation of the mission from observations, numerical simulations
and laboratory simulations
CONSERT
Optimisation of the science return from
- measurements of the properties of ices-dust samples with relevant
porosities, temperatures, concentrations
- numerical simulations with 3D thermal models of the nucleus
Other proposed missions
ESA & Jaxa, Marco Polo, NEO sample return?
ICAPS for accretion exp. on board ISS?
Philae artist view (ESA)
Levasseur-Regourd Alicante, 2007 14
Mars
Please do not forget comet nuclei in
catastrophic disruption studies
- Small
- Fragile
- Mostly hidden
- Often suffering disruptions
- Underdense
- Possibly built of fluffy particles
- Having suffered impacts
More to be hopefully known in 2014
Thank you