april 3, 2006 comparison of archaeological and magnetic methods for identification of subsurface...

33
April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich Michael Rogers Ithaca College

Post on 19-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native

American House Features

Kevin Faehndrich

Michael Rogers

Ithaca College

Page 2: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Pre-historic Housing Structure

Ithaca College

Page 3: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Cesium Magnetometer

Sensors

Control Unit

Battery Belt

Ithaca College

Page 4: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006 Ithaca College

How a Magnetic Survey Works

http://www.physics.brocku.ca/courses/1p93/images/f21005.jpg

Image Credit:

Page 5: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

How a Magnetic Survey Works

Earth’s magnetic field

Magneticfield ofburiedobject

Ithaca College

Page 6: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Interpretation of Magnetic Data

Image credit:www.cliffdwellingsmuseum.com/phous.gif

Ithaca College

Page 7: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Gila Encantada Village Site

Image credit: nature.org/wherewework/fieldguide/projectprofiles/gmh.html

Ithaca College

1460 15805380

5540

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 8: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Area Surveyed

Ithaca College1460 1520 1580

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

5380

5460

5540 L

ocal

-Y G

rid C

oord

inat

e (m

)

Page 9: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Area Surveyed

Ithaca College1460 1520 1580

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

5380

5460

5540 L

ocal

-Y G

rid C

oord

inat

e (m

)

Page 10: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Conducting a Magnetic Survey

GNGN

Loca

l y-c

oord

inat

e (m

)

Local x-coordinate (m)Ithaca College1478 1498

5440

5500

Page 11: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Conducting a Magnetic Survey

1478 1498

5440

5500

Loca

l y-c

oord

inat

e (m

)

Local x-coordinate (m)Ithaca College

GNGN

Page 12: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Conducting a Magnetic Survey

GNGN

Loca

l y-c

oord

inat

e (m

)

Local x-coordinate (m)Ithaca College1478 1498

5440

5500

Page 13: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Interpretation of Magnetic Data

Image credit:www.cliffdwellingsmuseum.com/phous.gif

Ithaca College

1486 1498

5476

5488

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 14: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Interpretation of Magnetic Data

Image credit:www.cliffdwellingsmuseum.com/phous.gif

Ithaca College

1486 1498

5476

5488

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 15: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Interpretation of Magnetic Data

Image credit:www.cliffdwellingsmuseum.com/phous.gif

Ithaca College

1486 1498

5476

5488

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 16: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Interpretation of Magnetic Data

Image credit:www.cliffdwellingsmuseum.com/phous.gif

Ithaca College

1486 1498

5476

5488

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 17: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Magnetic Survey

Ithaca College1460 15805380

5460

5540

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 18: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Archaeological Methods

Ithaca College1460 15805380

5460

5540

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 19: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Comparison of Results

Ithaca College

•8 suspected pithouses found by both methods

•3 suspected pithouses from magnetic methods not found with archaeological methods

•7 suspected pithouses from archaeological methods not found with magnetic methods

1460 15805380

5460

5540

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 20: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Comparison of Results

Ithaca College1460 15805380

5460

5540

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 21: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Future Comparisons

Ithaca College1460 15805380

5460

5540

Local-X Grid Coordinate (m)

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 22: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Corey Cayuga Village Site

Ithaca College

Page 23: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Longhouse

Ithaca Collegehttp://www.mtmorriscsd.org/elementary/inside_longhouse.jpgImage Credit:

Page 24: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Corey Cayuga Village Site

Ithaca College

960 1020 1080 1140

Local X-Grid Coordinate (m)

5000

5040

980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 10005020

5022

5024

5026

5028

5030

20002000.520012001.520022002.520032003.520042004.5 20052005.520066000

6000.5

6001

6001.5

6002

6002.5

6003

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 25: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Corey Cayuga Village Site

Ithaca College

960 1020 1080 1140

Local X-Grid Coordinate (m)

5000

5040

980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 10005020

5022

5024

5026

5028

5030

20002000.520012001.520022002.520032003.520042004.5 20052005.520066000

6000.5

6001

6001.5

6002

6002.5

6003

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 26: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Complications in Data Analysis

1060 1080 11005020

5040

Local x-grid coordinate (m)

Loca

l y-g

rid c

oord

inat

e (m

)

Ithaca College

Page 27: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Complications in Data Analysis

1060 1080 11005020

5040

Local x-grid coordinate (m)

Loca

l y-g

rid c

oord

inat

e (m

)

Ithaca College

Page 28: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Complications in Data Analysis

Excavated Plow Scar

Ithaca College

Page 29: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Corey Cayuga Village Site

Ithaca College

960 1020 1080 1140

Local X-Grid Coordinate (m)

5000

5040

980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 10005020

5022

5024

5026

5028

5030

20002000.520012001.520022002.520032003.520042004.5 20052005.520066000

6000.5

6001

6001.5

6002

6002.5

6003

Loc

al-Y

Grid

Coo

rdin

ate

(m)

Page 30: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Complications in Data Analysis

Local x-grid coordinate (m)

Loca

l y-g

rid c

oord

inat

e (m

)

1020 1040 1060

5000

5020

Ithaca College

Page 31: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Complications in Data Analysis

Ithaca CollegeLocal x-grid coordinate (m)

Loca

l y-g

rid c

oord

inat

e (m

)

1020 1040 1060

5000

5020

Page 32: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Conclusions / Future Work

Ithaca College

Gila Encantada Village Site Corey Cayuga Village Site

Page 33: April 3, 2006 Comparison of Archaeological and Magnetic Methods for Identification of Subsurface Pre-historic Native American House Features Kevin Faehndrich

April 3, 2006

Acknowledgements: -Dr. Barbra Roth -Dr. Jack Rossen -Greg Shear -Kristiyan Georgiev

Funding: -Ithaca College Anthropology Department -Ithaca College Physics Ford Research Fund -Ithaca College Dana Internship -Ithaca College summer Faculty salary - University of Nevada-Las Vegas Archaeological Field School

Ithaca College

Questions?