architectural thesis logbook 2010

COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE

ARCHITECTURAL THESIS LOGBOOK

SCHOOL YEAR 2010-2011

The Pontifical and Royal UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

Espana, Manila

1

Copyright 2010 Jonathan V. Manalad

All Rights Reserved

2

This Thesis Logbook belongs to: Name: _______________________________________ Year and Section ___________ Contact Info ___________________________________ Email Address: ________________________________ Thesis Adviser: ________________________________ Consultation Schedule:

3

Table of Contents

Copyright Page 1 Logbook Owner's Information 2 Table of Contents 3 2010-2011 Architectural Thesis Council 4 Thesis Advisor's Information 5 General Calendar for Design 9 6 Student's Guidelines for Design 9 7 Recognition & Acknowledgment of D9 Policies 10 D9 Consultation Sheets 12 D9 Final Evaluation Sheet 48 Certificate of Design 9 Completion 52 General Calendar for Design 10 54 Student's Guidelines for Design 10 55 Recognition & Acknowledgment of D10 Policies 61 D10 Consultation Sheets 63 D10 Preliminary Endorsement Form 73 Certificate of Design 10 First Endorsement 75 D10 Consultation Sheets 77 D10 Final Endorsement Form 87 Certificate of Design 10 Final Endorsement 89 D10 Final Evaluation Sheet 91 Juror's Grading Sheet 93 Jury's Final Grading Sheet 99

4

2010 – 2011 Architectural Thesis Council Members

and Contributors to the content of the Thesis Logbook

Arch. Jonathan V. Manalad, Chair

Arch. Norma I. Alarcon, Member

Arch. Rogelio D. Caringal, Member

Arch. Jennifer Angeles – Cruz, Member

Arch. Sylvia Clemente, Member

ADD US ON FACEBOOK FOR THE LATEST UPDATES AND DISCUSSIONS:

UST ARKI ONLINE THESIS FORUM

5

Thesis Adviser’s Information Name: _______________________________________ Contact Info (to be supplied by the adviser)________________________ Email Address: ________________________________ Consultation Schedule:

6

GENERAL CALENDAR OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9 SCHOOL YEAR 2010-2011

Week Inclusive Dates Activities

1 June 15-19, 2010 Opening of School Year 2010-2011 Class Orientation, Classroom Policies, Grading System, etc.

2 June 21-26, 2010 Inspection and Signing of Thesis Logbook Students’ Individual Consultation - CHAPTERS 1, 2 & 3 – Introduction, Review of Related Literature, Research Methodology

3 June 28 – July 3, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – CHAPTERS 4 & 5 – Project Profile & Analysis / Site Profile & Analysis JULY 3 – SUBMISSION OF THESIS PROPOSAL TO THE OFFICE OF THE DEAN FOR REVIEW and APPROVAL

4 July 5-10, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – CHAPTER 6 – Data Presentation Distribution of signed Thesis Proposals JULY 8 – 2nd THESIS FORUM: GUIDELINES ON PROPER SITE PLANNING Organizing Committee: AR 5-2 & 5-10 (program) AR 5-3 & 5-11 (speaker)

5 July 12-17, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – CHAPTER 7 – Thesis Focus

6 July 19-24, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – CHAPTER 8 – Space Analysis & Programming JULY 22 – 3rd THESIS FORUM: FORMULATION OF A GOOD DESIGN CONCEPT Organizing Committee: AR 5-4 & 5-12 (program) AR 5-5 & 5-13 (speaker)

7 July 26-31, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – CHAPTER 9 – Conceptual Analysis

8 August 2-7, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – CHAPTER 10 - Conclusion AUGUST 5 – 4th THESIS FORUM: SENSIBLE APPROACHES IN SPACE PROGRAMMING Organizing Committee: AR 5-6 & 5-14 (program) AR 5-7 & 5-15 (speaker)

9 August 9-14, 2010 PRELIMINARY EXAM WEEK PRELIM EXAM OUTPUT: SUBMISSION OF FINAL DRAFT OF THESIS BOOK

10 August 16-21, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

11 August 23-28, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – FLOOR PLANS

12 August 30 – Sept.4, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation - ELEVATIONS

13 Sept. 6-11, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation - SECTIONS

14 Sept. 13-18, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – REFINEMENTS / BUFFER PERIOD

15 Sept. 20-25, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – RESEARCH FOCUS DRAWINGS / ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS

16 Sept. 27 – Oct. 2, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – STUCTURAL DETAILS / CONCEPTS

17 October 4-9, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation – INTERIOR & EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES

18 October 11-16, 2010 FINAL EXAM WEEK FINAL EXAM OUTPUT: PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS OF PROPOSAL and ENHANCEMENTS DONE ON THESIS BOOK

7

STUDENT’S GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ARCHITECTURE

THESIS PROGRAM: DESIGN 9

1.0 BACKGROUND The Architecture Thesis Program is composed of three parts, namely: Research Methods in Architecture (RMA), Design 9 (D9) and Design 10 (D10). At the end of the Design 9 course, the students should be able:

1.1 To undertake a thorough research of an architectural problem (encompassing design, planning, history, building technology, building materials, building systems) which is of their own chosen topic and translate gathered information into a viable design solution.

1.2 To be able to compile and submit research material into an approved thesis book together with schematic conceptual designs suggesting the injection of a new and innovative thought in the approach to the design solution. This compilation should be submitted in a manner befitting work of a final year architecture student.

2.0 DESIGN 9 Design 9 is based on the premise that the student has completed and passed all the requirements of RMA and that the thesis proposal, which is its final output, has been endorsed by the RMA Advisor.

2.1 Scope of Works. The scope of works for Design 9 includes the submission and final approval of a thesis proposal (as approved by the UST Dean of College of Architecture), evaluation and final approval of the unbounded thesis book (excluding the final design drawings and solutions), and satisfactory compliance of all the requirements of the Architectural Thesis Logbook.

2.2 Expected Output. This listing represents the minimum output that shall be included

in the Design 9 thesis proposal and book. The student shall have their thesis proposal and book proofread for grammar, spelling, and syntax prior to final submission of works. Students shall follow the University’s Code of Conduct and Discipline, at all times, and shall refrain from any forms of dishonesty such as plagiarism in thesis writing.

2.2.1 Thesis Proposal. Includes the Letter of Proposal to be signed by the

thesis student, endorsed by the thesis advisor, recommended by the thesis council, and approved by the dean.

2.2.2 Thesis Book

Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature Chapter 3 Research Methodology Chapter 4 Project Profile and Analysis Chapter 5 Site Profile and Analysis Chapter 6 Data Presentation Chapter 7 Research Focus Chapter 8 Space Analysis & Programming Chapter 9 Conceptual Analysis Chapter 10 Conclusion

8

2.2.3 Architectural Thesis Logbook. The logbook shall contain a calendar of all the D9 and D10 activities including documentation forms (attendance to forums and weekly advisor’s consultations) and checklists/guidelines that will aid the student during the entire thesis program. The student is required to bring the logbook at all times; especially, during advisor’s consultations for the proper monitoring of the performance of the student.

2.3 Thesis Proposal and Book Format. All thesis proposals and books shall conform to the prescribed format: Typewritten on A4 size bond paper with margins 1 ½” (left) and 1” (right), justified, 1 ½” space using 12 font size (Times New Roman or Arial), Title Page, Letter of Proposal, Table of Contents/thesis outline, Footnotes/Citations/Bibliography (APA format), and Appendix or Appendices.

2.4 Advisor’s Consultation. A weekly consultation with the design advisor shall be required to enable the advisor to monitor and assess the progress of the student. External consultations with other UST College of Architecture professors and / or other private individuals shall be at the discretion of the student but will not in anyway form part of the advisor’s assessment of the student’s semestral performance.

2.5 Final Thesis Book Evaluation. The advisor shall evaluate the extent of the

student’s compliance to all the requirements of the thesis book outline as to its quality and completeness. If the advisor finds the student’s work satisfactory, the advisor then signs the Certificate of Completion at the end of the D9 course program. The Certificate shall serve as the advisor’s guide when determining the student’s final D9 grade. It shall also serve as guide for the jurors when the determining the completeness of the book during actual thesis deliberations. 3.0 D9 POLICIES

3.1 Advisor’s Grading Criteria 3.1.1 Submission of completed Thesis Book (draft and unbounded) 70% 3.1.2 Adherence to Consultation Duties 25% 3.1.3 Maturity and Attitude 5% 3.2 Absences. The core of the Design 9 course program is based on the

student’s diligent consultation and constant update of his/her progress with the advisor. Hence, failure to regularly consult (following the University Policy on Attendance) with the advisor shall result to a grade of F.A. or Failure due to Absences.

3.3 University Code of Conduct and Discipline (UST Student Handbook

2005-2006). As a matter of UST University policy, the following are excerpts from the guidelines which thesis students should be reminded of.

3.3.1 Courtesy. Courtesy is a sign of maturity. Its observance creates a climate of goodwill and fellowship. Thomasian students must, at all times, be courteous and respectful of others. Any act of disrespect, either in words or in deeds, done toward University authorities, faculty members, employees, fellow students and visitors constitute an un-Christian behavior; likewise the unreasonable refusal to comply with lawful orders of University authorities and/or their agents constitute an un-Christian behavior.

Thomasian students, who impede, obstruct, prevent or defeat the right and

obligation of a teacher or professor to teach his/her subject, or the right to attend his/her classes or any official activity shall be subject to disciplinary action.

9

3.3.2 Honesty. The University, in accordance with its Catholic teachings, puts a high premium on the practice of honesty. Consequently, any act of dishonesty should be avoided.

The following are considered acts of dishonesty: a) Forging, altering and/or misusing of University documents, records,

credentials or effects; b) Printing and disseminating false information to or about the University; c) Cheating in examinations, projects, homeworks, and/or other schoolworks; d) Plagiarizing; and e) Similar situations (letters a to d). 3.3.3 Diligence. A Thomasian student gives honor to his family and to the

University by being diligent in his studies. He/She should have a natural thirst for knowledge and view his/her attendance in the University as an opportunity to learn and improve himself/herself.

Thus, a student must be a) Punctual; b) Present in his/her classes and participate in school-sanctioned activities; c) Prepared for his lessons, homeworks, and examinations. 3.3.4 Good Grooming. 3.3.5 Decency and Modesty in Action. A Thomasian student must, at all times,

act with proper decorum and etiquette.

10

Recognition & Acknowledgment of Architectural Design 9 Policies

I, __________________________________________ hereby acknowledge that I

have carefully read and understood all the provisions of the Architectural Design 9

Guidelines as detailed in the Architectural Thesis Logbook.

I further acknowledge that I am now tasked to proceed with my research works in

accordance with the existing guidelines and policies of the College. I am likewise

required to submit the said research work on the time and date designated by the Thesis

Adviser this Semester.

It is understood that my compliance to all of the provisions specified herein shall

be the basis of my adviser’s assessment of my performance in accordance to all existing

grading and evaluation policies of the College and of the University.

Signed: Date:

____________________________ __________________________

PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE

(Name, Middle Name, Surname)

11





I further acknowledge that I am now tasked to proceed with my research works in

accordance with the existing guidelines and policies of the College. I am likewise

required to submit the said research work on the time and date designated by the Thesis

Adviser this Semester.




Signed: Date:

____________________________ __________________________



NOTE TO THE STUDENT: PLEASE DETACH THIS DUPLICATE COPY FROM FILE AND SUBMIT TO YOUR ADVISER ON OR BEFORE THE END OF JUNE, 2010. NOTE TO THE ADVISER: PLEASE COLLECT AND COMPILE IN A SHORT BROWN ENVELOPE.AND SUBMIT TO THE THESIS COUNCIL CHAIR ON OR BEFORE JULY 3, 2010.

CUT HERE

12

D9 Consultation Sheet [THESIS FORM 2010-001] WEEK 1 To the student: Please fill up the necessary information and present this to your Thesis Adviser each time you come for your consultation. Thank you. Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Date of Consultation ____________________________ Time: ____________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________________________________________ What is the purpose of your consultation with your adviser today? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To the Adviser: Please fill up the necessary information below to serve as a guide for the student to proceed to the next step as a result of his/her consultation with you today. Thank you. What is your comment on the student’s output today? Has he/she accomplished what was instructed to him/her during the last consultation? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What should the student accomplish for his/her next consultation? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ When is the next consultation schedule of the student (date & time)? ________________________________________________________________________ Signed: Date: ____________________________ __________________________ ADVISER’S PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE

13

D9 Consultation Sheet [THESIS FORM 2010-001] WEEK 1 To the student: Please fill up the necessary information and present this to your Thesis Adviser each time you come for your consultation. Thank you. Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Date of Consultation ____________________________ Time: ____________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________________________________________ What is the purpose of your consultation with your adviser today? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To the Adviser: Please fill up the necessary information below to serve as a guide for the student to proceed to the next step as a result of his/her consultation with you today. Thank you. What is your comment on the student’s output today? Has he/she accomplished what was instructed to him/her during the last consultation? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What should the student accomplish for his/her next consultation? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ When is the next consultation schedule of the student (date & time)? ________________________________________________________________________ Signed: Date: ____________________________ __________________________ ADVISER’S PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE NOTE TO THE STUDENT: PLEASE DETACH THIS DUPLICATE COPY FROM FILE AND SUBMIT TO YOUR ADVISER AT THE END OF THE CONSULTATION. NOTE TO THE ADVISER: PLEASE COLLECT AND COMPILE IN A SHORT BROWN ENVELOPE TO BE USED AS FUTURE REFERENCE WHEN EVALUATING THE STUDENT’S PERFORMANCE.

CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

14


15


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

16


17


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

18


19


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

20


21


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

22


23


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

24


25


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

26


27


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

28


29


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

30


31


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

32


33


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

34


35


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

36


37


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

38


39


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

40


41


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

42


43


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

44


45


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

46


47


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

48

DESIGN 9 FINAL EVALUATION SHEET [THESIS FORM 2010-002] Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________________________________________ To the Adviser: Please fill up the necessary information below to serve as a thorough assessment of the student’s performance this semester. Thank you. EVALUATION CRITERIA: A. Is the work complete? Please check the box if the student has the following chapters in his/her final output. This will constitute 35% of the student’s grade:

Chapter 1 Introduction (3.5 points) Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature (3.5 points) Chapter 3 Research Methodology (3.5 points) Chapter 4 Project Profile and Analysis (3.5 points) Chapter 5 Site Profile and Analysis (3.5 points) Chapter 6 Data Presentation (3.5 points) Chapter 7 Research Focus (3.5 points) Chapter 8 Space Analysis & Programming (3.5 points) Chapter 9 Conceptual Analysis (3.5 points) Chapter 10 Conclusion (3.5 points)

SUB TOTAL FOR ITEM A: _____ % (out of 35%) B. Is the work of good quality? Please evaluate the overall output of the student using the following evaluation matrix. This will constitute 35% of the student’s grade:

GRADING CRITERIA POOR NEEDS IMPROVEMENT GOOD VERY

GOOD EXCELLENT

Quality & Comprehensiveness of Content 50%

12.3 13.1 14.9 16.6 17.5

Grammar 10% 2.5 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.5

Citation of Sources in APA STYLE 20% 4.9 5.3 6.0 6.7 7.0

Adherence to Standard Presentation 20% 4.9 5.3 6.0 6.7 7.0

OUTPUT GRADE: (out of 35%)

49

DESIGN 9 FINAL EVALUATION SHEET [THESIS FORM 2010-002] Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________________________________________ To the Adviser: Please fill up the necessary information below to serve as a thorough assessment of the student’s performance this semester. Thank you. EVALUATION CRITERIA: A. Is the work complete? Please check the box if the student has the following chapters in his/her final output. This will constitute 35% of the student’s grade:

Chapter 1 Introduction (3.5 points) Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature (3.5 points) Chapter 3 Research Methodology (3.5 points) Chapter 4 Project Profile and Analysis (3.5 points) Chapter 5 Site Profile and Analysis (3.5 points) Chapter 6 Data Presentation (3.5 points) Chapter 7 Research Focus (3.5 points) Chapter 8 Space Analysis & Programming (3.5 points) Chapter 9 Conceptual Analysis (3.5 points) Chapter 10 Conclusion (3.5 points)



GOOD EXCELLENT

Quality & Comprehensiveness of Content 50%

12.3 13.1 14.9 16.6 17.5

Grammar 10% 2.5 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.5

Citation of Sources in APA STYLE 20% 4.9 5.3 6.0 6.7 7.0

Adherence to Standard Presentation 20% 4.9 5.3 6.0 6.7 7.0


NOTE TO THE STUDENT: PLEASE DETACH THIS DUPLICATE COPY FROM FILE AND SUBMIT TO YOUR ADVISER NOTE TO THE ADVISER: PLEASE COLLECT AND COMPILE IN A SHORT BROWN ENVELOPE TO BE USED AS FUTURE REFERENCE WHEN EVALUATING THE STUDENT’S PERFORMANCE.

CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

50

C. Has the student adhered to his/her consultation duties? Please evaluate the overall output of the student using the following evaluation matrix. This will constitute 25% of the student’s grade:


GOOD EXCELLENT

Comes to a consultation prepared (50%) 8.75 9.38 10.63 11.88 12.50

Provides personal design / research insights (30%) 5.25 5.63 6.38 7.13 7.50

Attends consultation regularly (20%) 3.50 3.75 4.25 4.75 5.00


D. Does the student display maturity and the right deportment during this semester? Please evaluate the overall output of the student using the following evaluation matrix. This will constitute 5% of the student’s grade:


GOOD EXCELLENT

Level of Maturity and Deportment (100%) 3.5 3.8 4.3 4.8 5.0

Do you have other comments on the student? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: A. COMPLETENESS OF WORK (35%) ______________________ B. QUALITY OF WORK (35%) ______________________ C. CONSULTATION DUTIES (20%) ______________________ D. MATURITY & ATTITUDE (5%) ______________________ FINAL GRADE: ______________________ Signed: Date: ____________________________ __________________________ PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE

51

C. Has the student adhered to his/her consultation duties? Please evaluate the overall output of the student using the following evaluation matrix. This will constitute 25% of the student’s grade:


GOOD EXCELLENT







GOOD EXCELLENT


Do you have other comments on the student? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: A. COMPLETENESS OF WORK (35%) ______________________ B. QUALITY OF WORK (35%) ______________________ C. CONSULTATION DUTIES ______________________ D. MATURITY & ATTITUDE ______________________ FINAL GRADE: ______________________ Signed: Date: ____________________________ __________________________ PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

52


Certificate of Completion

This Certificate is hereby given to _________________________________ whose thesis

proposal entitled _____________________________________________ has been

carefully evaluated and endorsed by the undersigned Thesis Adviser and has

subsequently been reviewed and approved by the Office of the Dean.

This further certifies that the student has successfully completed all the requirements of

the Architectural Design 9 course and is now eligible to proceed to Architectural Design

10 course.

This Certificate of Completion is issued on __________________.

______________________________________ Thesis Adviser


Espana, Manila

53

Congratulations! You have hurdled the first of 2 parts of Architectural Thesis. You are now expected to enhance your work as instructed by adviser. You are also expected to proceed in finishing the schematic drawings necessary for the 2nd part of this academic exercise.

54

GENERAL CALENDAR OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 10 SCHOOL YEAR 2010-2011

Week Inclusive Dates Activities

1 November 10-13, 2010 Start of Second Semester Class Orientation, Classroom Policies, Grading System, etc.

2 November 15-20, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation

3 November 22-27, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation

4 Nov. 29 – Dec. 4, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation

5 December 6-11, 2010 FIRST ENDORSEMENT WEEK

6 December 13-18, 2010 Students’ Individual Consultation

7 January 3-8, 2011 Students’ Individual Consultation

8 January 10-15, 2011 Students’ Individual Consultation

9 January 17-22, 2011 PRELIMINARY EXAM WEEK

10 January 24-29, 2011 JANUARY 27 am – STUDENTS’ THESIS FORUM : MEET THE JURY pm - FACULTY THESIS FORUM : DELIBS REFRESHER

JANUARY 28 – FINAL ENDORSEMENT DAY – Thesis adviser shall determine the 3-hour grace period per class but within 8am – 5pm only JANUARY 29 am – DRAWING OF LOTS by the THESIS ADVISERS pm – POSTING OF DELIBERATION SCHEDULE

11 January 31- Feb. 5, 2011 THESIS DELIBERATION WEEK

12 February 7-12, 2011 Student’s Completion (if applicable)

13 February 14-19, 2011 EXHIBIT OF OUTSTANDING THESES

14 February 21-26, 2011 BUFFER PERIOD

15 February 28- Mar. 5, 2011 FINAL EXAM WEEK FOR GRADUATING STUDENTS

55

STUDENT’S GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ARCHITECTURE

THESIS PROGRAM: DESIGN 10

1.0 BACKGROUND The Architecture Thesis Program is composed of three parts, namely: Research Methods in Architecture (RMA), Design 9 (D9) and Design 10 D10). At the end of the program, the students should be able to:

1.1 Propose a relevant, feasible, and creative architectural design solution to an existing physical problem.

1.2 Apply the Architectural Design Process in the development of their design solution. 1.3 Justify and defend their solution to the best of their ability.

2.0 DESIGN 10 Design 10 is based on the premise that the student has completed and passed all the requirements of Design 9 and that the thesis book, which is its final output, has been endorsed by the Design 9 Advisor. 2.1 Scope of Works. The scope of works for Design 10 includes the evaluation and final approval of final schematic plans, preparation of final presentation drawings, and defense of design solution before the jury panel.

2.2 Expected Output. The listing represents the minimum outputs that have to be produced in Design 10 prior to the deliberation of the Thesis Jury Panel. It should be seen as a checklist for all items required for deliberation.

Final Schematic Design Concept Board/s Site development plan/s and/or Scale Model (any convenient scale) Floor plans (minimum scale is 1:200 meters) Elevations (minimum scale is 1:200 meters) 4 Elevations for a single structure of 2 elevations per building for multiple structures Note: all elevations have to rendered with shade and shadows shown Sections (minimum scale is 1:200 meters) 2 Sections for a single structure or 1 section per structure for multiple structures. Exterior perspective/s showing all structures (aerial/bird’s eye view for building complexes) Architectural interior perspective/s of a major space in the project Architectural bay section (minimum scale is 1:50 meters) and Design Focus details Structural Concept Board

2.3 Drawing Requirements (subject to adjustments by the Thesis Council).

Multi-media presentation shall be allowed during the deliberation. The minimum board size for the presentation shall be 30x40 inches (75x100 cm.) All drawings, except perspectives, may be mounted on illustration boards

56

Presentation of scale models is optional. If student chooses to do a scale model, then illustration (drawing) of site development plan/s is no longer necessary provided that the proposed site development is indicated and shown in the model

2.4 Endorsements (subject to adjustments by the Thesis Council).

First Endorsement - The student must seek from his/her Thesis Advisor a FIRST ENDORSEMENT to proceed with the Design 10 Program between the fourth (4th) and fifthe (5th) week of the semester (end of November / first week of December {if 2nd semester}). This First Endorsement shall be based on the submitted schematic site development plans, floor plans, elevations and sections of the project.

Second / Final Endorsement – The week prior to the start of the Thesis Deliberations, the student must seek a Second Endorsement from his/her Thesis Advisor. The basis of this Second Endorsement shall be the completion of ninety percent 90% of all final drawings. Ninety percent (90%) completed is strictly defined as: 100% completed Site Development Plan (and/or scale model) including renderings, labels and other graphics/details 1000% completed Floor Plans, including rendering furniture/equipment/fixture layout, and labels. 100% completed elevations including rendering and shade and shadows 50% of all sections (at least) 50% of concept board/s (at least) Plotted perspectives on board/s Penciled on board/s of architectural bay section and structural concept The Thesis Advisor then signs and dates these boards and fills out the student’s Design 10 Final Endorsement Evaluation Sheet and Certification (Document ATG 10b) signifying approval and endorsement for Deliberations.

2.5 Drawing of Lots The students who have been given the Second / Final Endorsement, shall be included in the list of qualified students for the Drawing of Lots to determine the date and time of his/her deliberation. In order to ensure a strict order of this proceeding, the student shall be represented by his/her Thesis Advisor during the drawing of lots in the presence of the other Thesis Advisors. Immediately after the proceedings, the Thesis Coordinator shall post the final schedule of deliberations in a bulletin board of the College so the student is informed right away of his/her schedule of defense. In the event that the student, for any reason whatsoever is late for this drawing of lots or falls to appear on their scheduled date, they shall not be allowed to deliberate and will be awarded a WP as their final grade for the semester. If the student is sick or for any valid family &/or medical reasons, and thus cannot attend his/her thesis deliberation, he/she must send, through representative, all completed Thesis Works (boards, book and other supporting documents) to the assigned Day Chairman on the scheduled

57

day of deliberation during the second drawing of lots. Failure to do so will result in a WP as the Final Grade for Design 10.

2.6 Deliberation Guidelines

2.6.1 Deliberation Attire. The student should be in proper business attire during the Thesis Deliberation. Proper business attire is defined as dress shirts and ties, business suits, or Barong Tagalog for male students and dresses or business suits for female students. Casual attire, sandals and athletic shoes shall not be allowed.

2.6.2 Deliberation Day Requirements. The student should present to the Jury Panel the following: Duly filled out grading sheet: three (3) copies of Thesis Grading Sheet – Juror (Document ATG 9b) and one (1) copy of Thesis Grading Sheet – Final Grade (Document ATG 9a). Three bounded copies of the Executive Summary for each of the Jury Panelists. The Executive Summary should contain the following: Thesis Title Background of the Project Project Goals and Objectives Project Scope of Work Summary of Site Description Design Concepts, Philosophy, Objectives, Considerations Design Solutions (Final Design) A hard-bound copy of the Thesis Book. The Thesis Book that is the output in Design 9 should be used as the basis for design development in Design 10. The Jury Panel, during the Deliberations, can refer to and review the Thesis Book for pertinent information and completeness as well as for checking proper applications to the design solution. Conflicting information and solutions between the Thesis Book and the Final Design of the project as reflected on the Final Thesis Boards may lead the student to fail the Deliberation. Recording of Proceedings. The student is not allowed to record the proceedings by using audio or video equipment.

2.6.3 Deliberation Schedule Each student is given one hour to one and a quarter hours to deliberate and defend their project. This given time shall be broken down as follows: 25 to 30 minutes deliberation and presentation 25 to 30 minutes question and answer 10 to 15 minutes Jury Deliberation of Final Grade

2.6.4 Deliberation Policies All deliberations shall be open to the public. Relatives and guests may be invited to attend.

58

If the student wishes to use the Conference Room or any of the Audio-Visual Rooms of the College, they must make reservations to the appropriate offices way in advance. They must also inform the Deliberation Day Chairman of such arrangements during the second drawing of lots. The Jury may ask any question that it deems relevant to the Thesis Project. The student is responsible for the correctness of their answers within the scope of their project. The student must maintain their composure during the Deliberation even when confronted with difficult questions or when challenged by the members of the jury on particulars and details of their project. The students shall not be questioned on the financial feasibility of the project. However, the student may be asked questions on the socio-economic and environmental impact that the project may have on the immediate community/vicinity. The student should not have an antagonistic attitude before, during and after the Deliberation. The Jury may review the Thesis Book for supporting information that will give relevance and credence to the design solution. The Jury may check and review the Thesis Book for completion and adherence to the minimum guidelines set in Design 9. It is the student’s responsibility to ensure that all multi-media presentations, computers, projectors, television sets, VCRs and videotapes are on proper working order for the Deliberation. In the event that the equipment is faulty, the Jury may decide to skip that portion of the presentation and base Deliberation on the physical review of the final boards. During the Grade Deliberation of the Jury, the thesis candidate, all guests, and other students must leave the room to allow the Jury to determine the Final Grade in private. The Thesis Advisor, like other faculty and guests, may be present in all parts of the Deliberation primarily as an observer. He/She may also clarify items on the student’s work when asked by the Jury Panel. He/she is however prohibited to answer for the student, comment on Jury’s questions, or influence the outcome of the Deliberation process. Other faculty members may be present during the deliberation but will not have any official role in the proceedings. They will not be allowed to comment or to question the student or the jury members during the Deliberation process.

2.6.5 Jury Grade. The Jury Grade of the Thesis Project shall be based on the Average Grade of all three Jury Panelists. The following weighted mean shall be basis for the grading system: CATEGORY RATIO Design Concept 10% of 80% of the Juror Grade Site Development Plan 20% of 80% of the Juror Grade Floor Plans 30% of 80% of the Juror Grade Elevations, Sections, Perspectives 30% of 80% of the Juror Grade Structural Concept Architectural Bay Section & Design Focus 10% of 80% of the Juror Grade

59

NOTE : This 80% includes student’s decorum and his/her ability and competence to answer the Jury’s questions and inquiries. Presentation including : 20% of the Juror Grade Perspectives Renderings Scale Models (if any) Manner of Presentation

2.6.5 Grade Scale. Each Jury Panelist shall award individual numerical grades on all portions/categories of the project. The Grade Scale is from 50 to 100 with 70 as the passing mark.

2.6.6 Advisor Grade. The Thesis Advisor, who has worked with the student for two semesters, will be allocated a twenty-five percent (25%) apportionment in the computation of the Final Grade. This grade that constitutes one-quarter of the Final Grade and its corresponding breakdown will be documented by the Advisor on the Thesis Grading Sheet-Advisor (Document ATG 9c). The Advisor shall individually enclose his/her Thesis Grading Sheet – Advisor (Document ATG 9c) in a signed and sealed envelope and submit this to the Office of the Assistant Dean immediately after the Second Endorsement (one week prior to Deliberation).

2.6.7 Final Grade. The Jury Grade shall constitute three-quarters (75%) of the final grade while the advisor grade shall take up the remaining one-quarter (25%). This Final Grade of the Thesis Deliberation is automatically equivalent to the grade the student will receive for Design 10. The Thesis Advisor cannot in any case give passing grade in Design 10 to a student who fails in the Thesis Deliberation.

2.5.8 Post-Deliberation Guidelines. The student shall acknowledge the results of the Deliberation by affixing their signature on the designated box in the Thesis Grading Sheet – Final Grade (Document ATG 9a). The Jury Chairman shall then issue to the student the original copy of the Grading Sheet.

The student will collect all his/her Thesis Documents and Drawing Boards if he/she passes the Deliberation. The student however, will surrender all his/her Thesis Documents and Drawing Baords to the Architecture Dean’s Office ( to be received by the Office of the Dean) if he/she fails the Deliberation. If there are minor modifications and revisions recommended and specified by the Jury Panel, the Jury Chairman shall furnish the student with the duplicate (carbon) copy of the thesis grading sheet – Final Grade (Document ATG 9a). The Jury’s recommended revisions and changes should be clearly indicated in this Grading Sheet. The student should accomplish the specified revisions and modifications within three (3) days from the deliberation date. It is responsibility of the student to look for and meet with the Jury Chairman and at least one Jury Member for proper checking and endorsement of the completed works. Presentation and submission of these revised works shall be conducted within the confines of the College of Architecture of the University of Santo Tomas. The Jury Chairman and the Jury Member shall affix their respective signatures in the designated box in the duplicate copy of the grading sheet to indicate approval and endorsement of the revised

60

works. The student then present this duly signed grading sheet to the Thesis Coordinator to officially record his/her grade in the Thesis Deliberation. Upon presentation of the duly signed duplicate copy of the grading sheet, the Thesis Coordinator then issues to the student the original copy of the aforementioned document and officially records the student’s final grade. The Office of the Dean shall be furnish a copy of the complete Thesis Book of a student who receives a grade of 1.50 or above.

2.5.9 Appeals for Reconsideration and Requests for Redeliberations. The student may appeal their final grade or may request for a redeliberation only if: There is a valid medical reason or family/personal emergency for the student to miss their scheduled deliberation and this is evidenced by a doctor’s or a hospital’s certification. There is strong evidence of inappropriate behavior of the Thesis Jury Panel. This evaluation of the Jury’s behavior should be based on the guidelines for Jury members (see Roles and Responsibilities of Jury Panelists [Document ATG 5]).

2.5.10 Questions and Inquiries. The student can consult with the members of the Thesis Committee for any questions and inquiries regarding Design 9 &10. The student should maintain constant coordination and regular consultation with his/her Thesis Advisor.

61





I further acknowledge that I am now tasked to proceed with my architectural

design works in accordance with the existing guidelines and policies of the College. I am

likewise required to submit the said research work on the time and date designated by the

Thesis Adviser this Semester.




Signed: Date:

____________________________ __________________________



62





I further acknowledge that I am now tasked to proceed with my architectural

design works in accordance with the existing guidelines and policies of the College. I am

likewise required to submit the said research work on the time and date designated by the

Thesis Adviser this Semester.




Signed: Date:

____________________________ __________________________



NOTE TO THE STUDENT: PLEASE DETACH THIS DUPLICATE COPY FROM FILE AND SUBMIT TO YOUR ADVISER ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 13, 2010. NOTE TO THE ADVISER: PLEASE COLLECT AND COMPILE IN A SHORT BROWN ENVELOPE.AND SUBMIT TO THE THESIS COUNCIL CHAIR ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 15, 2010.

CUT HERE

63


64


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

65


66


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

67


68


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

69


70


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

71


72


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

73

D10 PRELIMINARY ENDORSEMENT [THESIS FORM 2010-004] Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________________________________________ NOTE: THE STUDENT MUST BE ABLE TO PRESENT HIS/HER OUTPUTS AS DESCRIBED IN ANY OF THE SHADED BOX TO BE ABLE TO MERIT A FINAL ENDORSEMENT.

REQUIRED OUTPUT 0% - 29%

(NO OUTPUT)

30% - 49% (BARELY

DONE)

50% - 74% (HALFWAY

COMPLETED)

75% - 89% (PARTIALLY

COMPLETED)

90% - 100% (COMPLETED)

50% completed Site Development Plan (and/or scale model) including renderings, labels and other graphics/details

No boards presented; or

boards without SDP

image

Boards with very little

pencil markings of SDP only

Complete SDP but w/o renderings, labels & other

graphics /details

Complete SDP but only has a few

renderings, labels & other graphics

/details

Complete SDP with renderings, labels and other graphics/details

50% completed Floor Plans, including rendering furniture/equipment/fixture layout, and labels.


boards without floor plan images


pencil markings of floor plans

only

Complete floor plans but w/o


/details

Complete floor plans but only

have a few renderings, labels & other graphics

/details

Complete floor plans with

renderings, labels and other

graphics/details

50% completed elevations including rendering and shade and shadows


boards without

elevation images


pencil markings of

elevations only

Complete elevations but w/o renderings, labels & other graphics

/details

Complete elevations but only


/details

Complete elevations with


graphics/details

30% of all sections (minumum)


boards without section images


pencil markings of sections only

Complete sections but w/o


/details

Complete sections but only have a few renderings, labels & other

graphics /details

Complete sections with renderings, labels and other graphics/details

30% of concept board/s (minumum)


boards without

conceptual images


pencil markings of conceptual

contents only

Complete conceptual board contents but w/o renderings, labels & other graphics

/details

Complete conceptual board contents but have a few renderings,

labels & other graphics /details

Complete conceptual board

contents with renderings, labels

and other graphics/details

Plotted perspectives on board/s


boards without

interior and exterior images


pencil markings of interior and

exterior perspectives

Plotted interior and exterior

perspectives but w/o renderings, labels & other

graphics /details


perspectives but have a few


/details

Fully-rendered interior and exterior

perspectives

Penciled on board/s of architectural bay section (ABS) and structural concept (SC)


boards without ABS & SC images


pencil markings of ABS & SC

images

Complete ABS & SC drawings but w/o renderings, labels & other

graphics /details

Complete ABS & SC drawings but


/details

Complete ABS & SC drawings with renderings, labels & other graphics

/details

Hard-bound Thesis Book Complete thesis book; Not

bound yet. Complete, hard-bound thesis book.

FINAL EVALUATION: DID NOT MEET ENDORSEMENT CRITERIA SATISFACTORILY MET THE ENDORSEMENT CRITERIA

Signed: Date: ____________________________ __________________________ ADVISER’S PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE

74

D10 PRELIMINARY ENDORSEMENT [THESIS FORM 2010-004] Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________________________________________ NOTE: THE STUDENT MUST BE ABLE TO PRESENT HIS/HER OUTPUTS AS DESCRIBED IN ANY OF THE SHADED BOX TO BE ABLE TO MERIT A FINAL ENDORSEMENT.


(NO OUTPUT)

30% - 49% (BARELY

DONE)

50% - 74% (HALFWAY

COMPLETED)


COMPLETED)




boards without SDP

image




graphics /details



/details







only

Complete floor plans but w/o


/details

Complete floor plans but only


/details

Complete floor plans with


graphics/details



boards without

elevation images


pencil markings of

elevations only

Complete elevations but w/o renderings, labels & other graphics

/details

Complete elevations but only


/details

Complete elevations with


graphics/details






Complete sections but w/o


/details

Complete sections but only have a few renderings, labels & other

graphics /details




boards without

conceptual images



contents only

Complete conceptual board contents but w/o renderings, labels & other graphics

/details

Complete conceptual board contents but have a few renderings,


Complete conceptual board

contents with renderings, labels

and other graphics/details



boards without






perspectives but w/o renderings, labels & other

graphics /details


perspectives but have a few


/details


perspectives






images

Complete ABS & SC drawings but w/o renderings, labels & other

graphics /details



/details

Complete ABS & SC drawings with renderings, labels & other graphics

/details

Hard-bound Thesis Book Complete thesis book; Not

bound yet. Complete, hard-bound thesis book.



NOTE TO THE STUDENT: PLEASE DETACH THIS DUPLICATE COPY FROM FILE AND SUBMIT TO YOUR ADVISER

NOTE TO THE ADVISER: PLEASE COLLECT AND COMPILE IN A SHORT BROWN ENVELOPE TO BE USED AS FUTURE REFERENCE WHEN EVALUATING THE STUDENT’S PERFORMANCE.

CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

75


Certificate of First Endorsement



carefully evaluated by the undersigned Thesis Adviser.

This further certifies that the student has successfully completed all the preliminary

requirements of the Architectural Design 10 course and is now eligible to proceed to the

final Phase of the Architectural Design 10 course.


______________________________________ Thesis Adviser


Espana, Manila

76


Certificate of First Endorsement




This further certifies that the student has successfully completed all the preliminary

requirements of the Architectural Design 10 course and is now eligible to proceed to the

final Phase of the Architectural Design 10 course.


______________________________________ Thesis Adviser


Espana, Manila


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

77


78


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

79


80


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

81


82


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

83


84


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

85


86


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

87

D10 FINAL ENDORSEMENT [THESIS FORM 2010-005] Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________________________________________ NOTE: THE STUDENT MUST BE ABLE TO PRESENT HIS/HER OUTPUTS AS DESCRIBED IN ANY OF THE SHADED BOX TO BE ABLE TO MERIT A FINAL ENDORSEMENT.


(NO OUTPUT)

30% - 49% (BARELY

DONE)

50% - 74% (HALFWAY

COMPLETED)


COMPLETED)




boards without SDP

image




graphics /details



/details







only

Complete floor plans but w/o renderings,


Complete floor plans but only have a few renderings, labels &

other graphics /details

Complete floor plans with renderings, labels and other graphics/details



boards without

elevation images


pencil markings of

elevations only

Complete elevations but w/o renderings,


Complete elevations but only have a few renderings, labels &


Complete elevations with renderings, labels and other graphics/details






Complete sections but w/o renderings,


Complete sections but only have a few renderings, labels &





boards without

conceptual images



contents only

Complete conceptual board contents but

w/o renderings, labels & other

graphics /details


have a few renderings, labels &


Complete conceptual board contents with

renderings, labels and other graphics/details



boards without





Plotted interior and exterior perspectives but w/o renderings,


Plotted interior and exterior perspectives

but have a few renderings, labels &



perspectives






images

Complete ABS & SC drawings but w/o renderings, labels &





Complete ABS & SC drawings with

renderings, labels & other graphics /details

Hard-bound Thesis Book Complete thesis book;

Not bound yet. Complete, hard-bound thesis book.



88

D10 FINAL ENDORSEMENT [THESIS FORM 2010-005] Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________________________________________ NOTE: THE STUDENT MUST BE ABLE TO PRESENT HIS/HER OUTPUTS AS DESCRIBED IN ANY OF THE SHADED BOX TO BE ABLE TO MERIT A FINAL ENDORSEMENT.


(NO OUTPUT)

30% - 49% (BARELY

DONE)

50% - 74% (HALFWAY

COMPLETED)


COMPLETED)




boards without SDP

image




graphics /details



/details







only

Complete floor plans but w/o renderings,


Complete floor plans but only have a few renderings, labels &


Complete floor plans with renderings, labels and other graphics/details



boards without

elevation images


pencil markings of

elevations only

Complete elevations but w/o renderings,


Complete elevations but only have a few renderings, labels &


Complete elevations with renderings, labels and other graphics/details






Complete sections but w/o renderings,


Complete sections but only have a few renderings, labels &





boards without

conceptual images



contents only


w/o renderings, labels & other

graphics /details




Complete conceptual board contents with

renderings, labels and other graphics/details



boards without





Plotted interior and exterior perspectives but w/o renderings,


Plotted interior and exterior perspectives

but have a few renderings, labels &



perspectives






images

Complete ABS & SC drawings but w/o renderings, labels &





Complete ABS & SC drawings with

renderings, labels & other graphics /details

Hard-bound Thesis Book Complete thesis book;

Not bound yet. Complete, hard-bound thesis book.



NOTE TO THE ADVISER: PLEASE COLLECT AND COMPILE IN A SHORT BROWN ENVELOPE TO BE USED FOR THE DRAWING OF LOTS.

CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

89


Certificate of Final Endorsement




This further certifies that the student has successfully completed at least ninety percent

(90%) of the Architectural Design 10 course requirements and is now eligible to defend

his/her thesis on the designated date and time to be determined during the drawing of lots

for all candidates that merited this Final Endorsement.


______________________________________ Thesis Adviser


Espana, Manila

90


Certificate of Final Endorsement




This further certifies that the student has successfully completed at least ninety percent

(90%) of the Architectural Design 10 course requirements and is now eligible to defend

his/her thesis on the designated date and time to be determined during the drawing of lots

for all candidates that merited this Final Endorsement.


______________________________________ Thesis Adviser


Espana, Manila


CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

91

DESIGN 10 FINAL EVALUATION SHEET [THESIS FORM 2010-006] Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________________________________________ To the Adviser: Please fill up the necessary information below to serve as a thorough assessment of the student’s performance this semester. THIS WILL CONSTITUTE 25 % OF YOUR STUDENT’S GRADE IN THE DELIBERATION. Thank you. EVALUATION CRITERIA: A. Is the work complete? Please check the box if the student has the following chapters in his/her final output. This will constitute 35% of the student’s grade:

Concept Board (3.5 points) Site Development Plant (3.5 points) All Floor Plans (3.5 points) All Elevations (3.5 points) All Sections (3.5 points) Architectural Bay Section (3.5 points) Structural Concept (3.5 points) Architectural Design Focus Drawings (3.5 points) Interior Perspective (3.5 points) Exterior Perspective (3.5 points)



GOOD EXCELLENT

Contribution to solving the Thesis Goals & Objectives 60%

14.7 15.8 17.9 20.0 21.0

Presentation of new ideas (design innovation) 20 %

4.9 5.3 6.0 6.7 7.0

Accuracy of drawings (drafting skills) / Presentation 20%

4.9 5.3 6.0 6.7 7.0


NOTE TO THE STUDENT: PLEASE DETACH THIS BLANK SHEET FROM FILE AND SUBMIT TO YOUR ADVISER NOTE TO THE ADVISER: EVALUATE YOUR STUDENT ACCORDINGLY AND FOLD IN THIRDS LENGTHWISE AND SEAL IN A LETTER ENVELOPE FOR ENDORSEMENT TO THE THESIS COMMITTEE CHAIR TOGETHER WITH THE DUPLICATE COPY OF THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT FORM [2010-005]

CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

92

Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ C. Has the student adhered to his/her consultation duties? Please evaluate the overall output of the student using the following evaluation matrix. This will constitute 25% of the student’s grade:


GOOD EXCELLENT







GOOD EXCELLENT


Do you have other comments on the student? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: A. COMPLETENESS OF WORK (35%) ______________________ B. QUALITY OF WORK (35%) ______________________ C. CONSULTATION DUTIES ______________________ D. MATURITY & ATTITUDE ______________________ FINAL GRADE: ______________________ Signed: Date: ____________________________ __________________________ PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE

NOTE TO THE STUDENT: PLEASE DETACH THIS BLANK SHEET FROM FILE AND SUBMIT TO YOUR ADVISER NOTE TO THE ADVISER: EVALUATE YOUR STUDENT ACCORDINGLY AND FOLD IN THIRDS LENGTHWISE AND SEAL IN A LETTER ENVELOPE FOR ENDORSEMENT TO THE THESIS COMMITTEE CHAIR TOGETHER WITH THE DUPLICATE COPY OF THE FINAL ENDORSEMENT FORM [2010-005]

CUT HERE

ADVISER’S COPY

93

THESIS DELIBERATION JUROR’S GRADING SHEET [THESIS FORM 2010-007] Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________ Adviser _________________________ To the Juror: Please evaluate the candidate accordingly by manually inputting the score for each item. Thank you.

A. DESIGN CONCEPT FAIL POOR CAN STILL

BE IMPROVED

GOOD VERY GOOD EXCELLENT

Contribution to solving the Thesis Goals & Objectives 60% 2.7 to 3.5 3.6 to 4.1 4.2 to 4.7 4.8 to 5.3 5.4 to 5.9 6.0


0.9 to 1.1 1.2 to 1.3 1.4 to 1.5 1.6 to 1.7 1.8 to 1.9 2.0

Accuracy of drawings (drafting skills) / Presentation 20% 0.9 to 1.1 1.2 to 1.3 1.4 to 1.5 1.6 to 1.7 1.8 to 1.9 2.0 OUTPUT GRADE: (out of 10%)

B. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FAIL POOR

CAN STILL BE

IMPROVED GOOD VERY

GOOD EXCELLENT



1.8 to 2.3 2.4 to 2.7 2.8 to 3.1 3.2 to 3.5 3.6 to 3.9 4.0


C. FLOOR PLANS FAIL POOR CAN STILL

BE IMPROVED




2.7 to 3.5 3.6 to 4.1 4.2 to 4.7 4.8 to 5.3 5.4 to 5.9 6.0


CUT HERE

JUROR 1’s COPY

94

Name ___________________ Year and Section ___________________

D. ELEVATIONS / SECTIONS /

PERSPECTIVES FAIL POOR

CAN STILL BE

IMPROVED GOOD VERY

GOOD EXCELLENT



2.7 to 3.5 3.6 to 4.1 4.2 to 4.7 4.8 to 5.3 5.4 to 5.9 6.0


E. STRUCTURAL

DETAILS/ ARCH'L. BAY SECT'N / DESIGN FOCUS

FAIL POOR CAN STILL

BE IMPROVED




0.9 to 1.1 1.2 to 1.3 1.4 to 1.5 1.6 to 1.7 1.8 to 1.9 2.0


Do you have other comments on the student? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ FINAL GRADE: (out of 100%) (A+B+C+D+E) =

Signed: Date: __________________________________ __________________________ JUROR’S PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE

CUT HERE

JUROR 1’s COPY

95



BE IMPROVED




0.9 to 1.1 1.2 to 1.3 1.4 to 1.5 1.6 to 1.7 1.8 to 1.9 2.0



CAN STILL BE

IMPROVED GOOD VERY

GOOD EXCELLENT



1.8 to 2.3 2.4 to 2.7 2.8 to 3.1 3.2 to 3.5 3.6 to 3.9 4.0



BE IMPROVED




2.7 to 3.5 3.6 to 4.1 4.2 to 4.7 4.8 to 5.3 5.4 to 5.9 6.0


CUT HERE

JUROR 2’s COPY

96




CAN STILL BE

IMPROVED GOOD VERY

GOOD EXCELLENT



2.7 to 3.5 3.6 to 4.1 4.2 to 4.7 4.8 to 5.3 5.4 to 5.9 6.0


E. STRUCTURAL


FAIL POOR CAN STILL

BE IMPROVED




0.9 to 1.1 1.2 to 1.3 1.4 to 1.5 1.6 to 1.7 1.8 to 1.9 2.0




CUT HERE

JUROR 2’s COPY

97



BE IMPROVED




0.9 to 1.1 1.2 to 1.3 1.4 to 1.5 1.6 to 1.7 1.8 to 1.9 2.0



CAN STILL BE

IMPROVED GOOD VERY

GOOD EXCELLENT



1.8 to 2.3 2.4 to 2.7 2.8 to 3.1 3.2 to 3.5 3.6 to 3.9 4.0



BE IMPROVED




2.7 to 3.5 3.6 to 4.1 4.2 to 4.7 4.8 to 5.3 5.4 to 5.9 6.0


CUT HERE

JUROR 3’s COPY

98




CAN STILL BE

IMPROVED GOOD VERY

GOOD EXCELLENT



2.7 to 3.5 3.6 to 4.1 4.2 to 4.7 4.8 to 5.3 5.4 to 5.9 6.0


E. STRUCTURAL


FAIL POOR CAN STILL

BE IMPROVED




0.9 to 1.1 1.2 to 1.3 1.4 to 1.5 1.6 to 1.7 1.8 to 1.9 2.0




CUT HERE

JUROR 3’s COPY

99

JURY’S FINAL GRADING SHEET [THESIS FORM 2010-007] Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________ Adviser _________________________ To the Jury Chair: Please manually input the score for each item. Thank you.

JUROR 1 GRADE: 75% JURY GRADE::

JUROR 2 GRADE: 25% ADVISOR'S GRADE:

JUROR 3 GRADE: STUDENT'S FINAL GRADE:

JURY AVERAGE GRADE: EQUIVALENT TO:

Point to Grade Conversion :

FINAL GRADE REMARKS THESIS GRADE Non-Appearance WP WP

50.00-69.99 Failed 5.00 70.00-73.33 Passed 3.00 73.34-76.66 Fair 2.75 76.67-79.99 Fair 2.50 80.00-83.33 Good 2.25 83.34-86.66 Good 2.00 86.67-89.99 Good 1.75 90.00-93.33 Very Good 1.50 93.34-96.66 Very Good 1.25 96.67-100.00 Excellent 1.00

Summary : Student’s Signature : Revisions-Due Date: Thesis Jury Panel Revisions Checked Chairman:

Member:

Member:

CUT HERE

JURY’s COPY

100

JURY’S FINAL GRADING SHEET [THESIS FORM 2010-007] Name ________________________________ Year and Section ___________________ Title of Thesis Proposal ____________________________________________________ Proposed Site ____________________________ Adviser _________________________ To the Jury Chair: Please manually input the score for each item. Thank you.

JUROR 1 GRADE: 75% JURY GRADE::

JUROR 2 GRADE: 25% ADVISOR'S GRADE:

JUROR 3 GRADE: STUDENT'S FINAL GRADE:

JURY AVERAGE GRADE: EQUIVALENT TO:

Point to Grade Conversion :

FINAL GRADE REMARKS THESIS GRADE Non-Appearance WP WP

50.00-69.99 Failed 5.00 70.00-73.33 Passed 3.00 73.34-76.66 Fair 2.75 76.67-79.99 Fair 2.50 80.00-83.33 Good 2.25 83.34-86.66 Good 2.00 86.67-89.99 Good 1.75 90.00-93.33 Very Good 1.50 93.34-96.66 Very Good 1.25 96.67-100.00 Excellent 1.00

Summary : Student’s Signature : Revisions-Due Date: Thesis Jury Panel Revisions Checked Chairman:

Member:

Member:

CUT HERE

STUDENT’s COPY

101

Congratulations! You have hurdled the second of 2 parts of Architectural Thesis. You made it! Time to have your well deserved rest. See you in your Graduation! HAS THIS LOGBOOK BEEN HELPFUL TO YOU? We would like to hear from you. Please email your feedback at [email protected]. Thank you for your cooperation.

architectural thesis logbook 2010

Documents

students guidelines

consultation schedule

architecture thesis

th thesis forum

nd thesis forum

rd thesis forum

thesis advisers information

submission of thesis