are there sufficient indications for switching to new ... presen… · antithrombotic...
TRANSCRIPT
Are there sufficientindications for switching tonew anticoagulant agents
Are there sufficientindications for switching tonew anticoagulant agents
Meyer Michel Samama et Gregoris GerotziafasGroupe Hémostase-Thrombose
Hôtel-Dieu, Hôpital Tenon, Paris & Biomnis Ivry/seine, France
X XaX Xa IX IXaIX IXa
First traces of thrombinFirst traces of thrombin
Activation of platelets, FV FVa, FVIII FVIIIaActivation of platelets, FV FVa, FVIII FVIIIa
Amplification of thrombin formationAmplification of thrombin formation
Tissue FactorVII VIIa
Tissue FactorVII VIIa
Atherosclerotic plaque Atherosclerotic plaque Blood borne TF*Blood borne TF*
Vascular lesionVascular lesion
* Activated monocytes-macrophages
r-TFPI r-NAPc2
VIIai
Anti IXa Anti Xa
Anti-IIa
Mechanism of blood coagulationMechanism of blood coagulation
Antithrombotic anticoagulants
Single target drugsSingle target drugsProven antithrombotic
activity
Selective Anti-Xa or Anti-IIa activity(free and bound activities)
New agents - Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, Edoxaban- Dabigatran…
New agents - Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, Edoxaban- Dabigatran…
Fondaparinux, Idrabiotaparinux
Hirudin and Bivalirudin
Otamixaban
ParenteralParenteral
OralOral
Multi target drugsMulti target drugs
Anti-Xa + Anti-IIaHeparins and LMWH
> 20 y.o.(ultra low MWH)
Vitamin K Antagonists
F II, VII, IX, X, PC, PS> 40 y.o.
Proven antithrombotic activity
Binding site of AT
LMWHsUFH PentasaccharideFONDAPARINUX
Idrabiotaparinux
Heparins (UFH, LMWH)Fondaparinux and Idrabiotaparinux
*
* Ultra Low Molecular Weight Heparin (semuloparin)
Oral Anticoagulants
Limitations of VKA Slow onset and offset
Iatrogenicity
Need of laboratory monitoring
No predictable response
Narrow therapeutic window
Prolonged half-life
Level of anticoagulation frequently outside the therapeutic range
Novel anticoagulants Fast onset and offset
Greater antithrombotic activity at similar rate of bleeding
No routine coagulation monitoring Predictable pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics
Broad therapeutic window
Short half-life
Minimal influence of comedications and food
Main objective
Obtained by chemical synthesis (different from animal derived substances)
No heparin induced thrombocytopenia
No need for routine anticoagulant monitoring
Minimal or no influence of comedications and diet
Cost of treatment ?
A new Era with novel anticoagulants
To overcome some of the limitations of VKA and heparins
Potential drawbacks of new oralanticoagulants
Lack of specific antidote for most drugs
Rebound hypercoagulation ?
Less active than VKA in the prevention of acute MI(Dabigatran RELY Study)
Problem of compliance and reduced medicalfollow-up patients education and physician information
No indications in pregnancy and breast feeding mothers,in pediatrics and in patients with mechanical cardiac valves…
RE-VOLUTION™
Clinical Trial Programme with Dabigatranin major orthopedic surgery (8000 patients)
No significant differences weredetected between Dabigatran etexilateand Enoxaparin in any of theendpoints analysed.
Meta-analysis of all 3 trials foundno significant differences betweentreatments in any of theendpoints analysed.
Dabigatran in Total Hip or KneeArthroplasty
Trial
N patients
Duration of prophylaxis (days)
Doses
First dose Dabigatran
Comparator Enoxaparin (mg)
R.R total VTE and all cause mortality
RE-MODELKnee
2101
6 -10
220 x 1150 x 1
Half-dose 1 - 4 hafter surgery
40 mg x 1
0.97 (0.82-1.13)
RE-MOBILIZEKnee
2615
12 -15
220 x 1150 x 1
Half-dose 6 - 12 hafter surgery
30 mg x 2
1.23 (1.03-1.47)
RE-NOVATEHip
3494
28 -35
220 x 1150 x 1
Half-dose 1 - 4 hafter surgery
40 mg x 1
0.90 (0.63-1.29)
Pooled analysis design
Rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban
Enoxaparin
Enoxaparin
Enoxaparin
RECORD 1
RECORD 2
RECORD 3
Hip
Hip
Knee
Follow-up
Follow-up
Follow-up
Follow-upPlacebo
Follow-up
Follow-up
Day 1
1e efficacyoutcomeDay 12*(10 - 14)
2e efficacy outcome(end of study medication)
Day 35(31 - 39)
Follow-upDay 65
(61 - 65)
Day 12*(10 - 14)
Follow-upDay 42#
(42 - 47)* 2-week time point; # 5-week time point
Conclusion : Symptomatic VTE + all-cause mortality at 2 weeks- RIVA. 0.4% versus ENOXA. 0.8% (p=0.005)
RECORD 4Design
SURGERY
SURGERY
R
Rivaroxaban 10 mg OD
6 - 8 hours after wound closureor adequate haemostasis
Enoxaparin 30 mg BID
12 - 24 hours after woundclosure or adequate haemostasis
Day 1
Follow-up
Follow-up
Mandatorybilateral
venography
Day 42+ 5
Day 13 ± 2
Last dose, daybefore venography
Double-blind
All p-values based on absolute weighted risk differences
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Inci
denc
e (%
)
Enoxaparin 30 mg x 2/dRivaroxaban 10 mg /d
6.9%
10.1%
2.0%1.2% 1.2%
0.7%0.3% 0.7%
RRR 31%
Rivaroxaban in Total Knee Replacementin US (RECORD 4)
Symptomatic VTEp=0.191
Major VTEp=0.124
Major bleedingp=0.110
Total VTEp=0.012
Progress in anticoagulant therapyProgress in anticoagulant therapy
Main advantages of new oral anticoagulantsin major orthopedic surgery
Rivaroxaban
- More efficacious than Lovenox
- Similar bleeding rate ?
- Single dosage 10 mg once a day
Dabigatran
- As efficacious as Lovenox
- Similar bleeding rate
- Two differents dosages 150 or 220 mg once a day
Remark- More convenient for prolonged treatment
Long term treatment with new oralanticoagulant drugs
Long term treatment with new oralanticoagulant drugs
Non valvular atrial fibrillation
Treatment of acute VTE
Secondary prevention in patients with VTE
Acute coronary syndrome (treatment during and post)
OrthopedicsSurgery
ProphylaxisDVT
Treatment / Secondary
PreventionDVT
Other Potential
Indications ACS ?
Re-Novate Re-ModelRe-Mobilize
Re-Novate Re-ModelRe-Mobilize
Re-CoverRe-MedyRe-CoverRe-Medy
8000 Patients8000 Patients 5000 Patients5000 Patients
DabigatranDabigatranPhase 3 Program
Stroke Prevention
in AF
Re-LyRe-Ly
15 000 Patients15 000 Patients
150 mg X 2
1.11
0.12
0.72
110 mg X 2
1.53
0.10
0.74
INR 2-3
1.69
0.38
0.53
Stroke
Intracranial hemorrhage
Myocardial Infarction
Dabigatran etexilate Warfarin
RE-LY Study in atrial fibrillationRE-LY Study in atrial fibrillation
(Outcome % per year)
AVERROES trial stopped earlyAVERROES trial stopped early
Apixaban(n=2809)
1.6
4.1
3.4
Outcomes
Stroke or systemic embolic event
Stroke, embolic event, MI, orvascular death
Total death
AVERROES : Primary and secondary end point
Aspirin(n=2791)
3.6
6.2
4.4
Relative risk(95% CI)
0.46 (0.33-0.64)
0.66 (0.53-0.83)
0.79 (0.62-1.02)
AVERROES : Bleeding events
Apixaban(n=2809)
1.4
3.0
Outcomes
Major bleeding
Clinical relevant non major bleeding
Aspirin(n=2791)
1.2
2.6
Relative risk(95% CI)
1.14 (0.74-1.75)
1.18 (0.88-1.58)
Results of Phase IIIclinical trials in
acute DVT and in secondaryprevention of VTE
with Dabigatran Etexilateand Rivaroxaban
Results of Phase IIIclinical trials in
acute DVT and in secondaryprevention of VTE
with Dabigatran Etexilateand Rivaroxaban
RE-COVERTM Trial DesignObjectiveconfirmationof VTEER30 daysfollow up Initial parenteraltherapy Single-dummyperiod Double-dummy period72 h6 monthsEnd of treatmentUntil INR ≥2.0 attwo consecutivemeasurements(8-11 days)WarfarinWarfarin(INR 2.0–3.0)Dabigatran etexilate placebo bidWarfarin placeboDabigatran etexilate 150 mg bidWarfarinplaceboE= enrolmentR= randomization
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010; 6:339-349
EINSTEIN EXTENSIONSecondary prevention DVT / PESecondary prevention DVT / PE
After initial treatment during 6 to 12 months (mean 8 months) Rivaroxaban 20 mg once a day (mean 190 days) versus Placebo Randomised double-blind superiority study
After initial treatment during 6 to 12 months (mean 8 months) Rivaroxaban 20 mg once a day (mean 190 days) versus Placebo Randomised double-blind superiority study
Rivaroxaban(n=602)
8 (1.3%)
0.3%
0
Rivaroxaban(n=602)
8 (1.3%)
0.3%
0
Placebo(n=594)
42 (7.1%)
0.2%
0.2%
Placebo(n=594)
42 (7.1%)
0.2%
0.2%
• DVT
• PE non fatal
• PE fatal
• DVT
• PE non fatal
• PE fatal
Linear rate of recurrences during the 6 months study
(NNTT 15 Pts)
Linear rate of recurrences during the 6 months study
(NNTT 15 Pts)
Rivaroxaban(n=602)
4 (0,7%)
3
32
5,4%
Rivaroxaban(n=602)
4 (0,7%)
3
32
5,4%
Placebo(n=595)
0 (p=0,10)
0
7
1,2
Placebo(n=595)
0 (p=0,10)
0
7
1,2
• Major bleeding
• Gastro intestinale bleeding
• Clinically significant bleeding
• Urogenital bleeding
• Major bleeding
• Gastro intestinale bleeding
• Clinically significant bleeding
• Urogenital bleeding
Liver enzymes > 3 fold normal(Transient increase)Liver enzymes > 3 fold normal(Transient increase)
66 11
EINSTEIN EXTENSIONSecondary prevention DVT / PESecondary prevention DVT / PE
ASC Stockholm, H. Buller 31/08/2010
ASC Stockholm, H. Buller 31/08/2010
ASC Stockholm, H. Buller 31/08/2010
ASC Stockholm, H. Buller 31/08/2010
ConclusionsConclusions In patients who had acute symptomatic proximal DVT,
without symptomatic PE, rivaroxaban showed :
Non-inferiority to LMWH/VKA for efficacy :HR=0.68 (0.44 - 1.04); p<0.0001 for non-inferiority
Similar findings for principal safety outcome :HR=0.97 (0.76 - 1.22); p=0.77
Consistent efficacy and safety results irrespectiveof age, body weight, gender, creatinine clearanceand cancer
No evidence for liver toxicity
ConclusionsConclusions
Oral rivaroxaban, 15 mg twice-daily for 3 weeks
followed by 20 mg once-daily, could provide
clinicians and patients with a simple, single-drug
approach for the acute and continued treatment
of DVT that potentially improves the benefit-risk
profile of anticoagulation.
Progress in anticoagulant therapyProgress in anticoagulant therapy
Laboratory monitoring
Standardized coagulation assays are available forsome clinical settings
Documented response of usual tests for rivaroxabanand dabigatran
Specific anti-Xa and anti-IIa testsand global tests : PT, aPTT, Ecarin clotting time
Progress in anticoagulant therapyProgress in anticoagulant therapy
Laboratory monitoring
Routine coagulation monitoring was not usedin clinical trials New therapeutic approach andimproved patients quality of life
However as bleeding is an inherent risk associatedwith all anticoagulants, one could raise the question :
Could the bleeding events observed in clinical trialshav been rduced if occasional monitoring has beenused ?
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION
New anticoagulants ready tochallenge WARFARIN / LMWHsNew anticoagulants ready to
challenge WARFARIN / LMWHs
Indications
Major orthopedic surgery (THR, TKR)
Treatment of acute VTE
Secondary prevention of VTE
Prophylaxis in medical patients
Atrial fibrillation
Acute coronary syndrome
Dabigatran, rivaroxabanVersus standard treatment More convenient and ≥ effectiveness and safety
Positive results : simple single drug approach for rivaroxaban…
Positive results
Ongoing studies
Dabigatran > warfarin Apixaban > aspirin
Increased bleeding, new ongoing studies